1
|
Ali Q, Zheng H, Rao MJ, Ali M, Hussain A, Saleem MH, Nehela Y, Sohail MA, Ahmed AM, Kubar KA, Ali S, Usman K, Manghwar H, Zhou L. Advances, limitations, and prospects of biosensing technology for detecting phytopathogenic bacteria. CHEMOSPHERE 2022; 296:133773. [PMID: 35114264 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Revised: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Phytopathogenic bacteria cause severe economic losses in agricultural production worldwide. The spread rates, severity, and emerging plant bacterial diseases have become serious threat to the sustainability of food sources and the fruit industry. Detection and diagnosis of plant diseases are imperative in order to manage plant diseases in field conditions, greenhouses, and food storage conditions as well as to maximize agricultural productivity and sustainability. To date, various techniques including, serological, observation-based, and molecular methods have been employed for plant disease detection. These methods are sensitive and specific for genetic identification of bacteria. However, these methods are specific for genetic identification of bacteria. Currently, the innovative biosensor-based disease detection technique is an attractive and promising alternative. A biosensor system involves biological recognition and transducer active receptors based on sensors used in plant-bacteria diagnosis. This system has been broadly used for the rapid diagnosis of plant bacterial pathogens. In the present review, we have discussed the conventional methods of bacterial-disease detection, however, the present review mainly focuses on the applications of different biosensor-based techniques along with point-of-care (POC), robotics, and cell phone-based systems. In addition, we have also discussed the challenges and limitations of these techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qurban Ali
- State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Institute of Agro-product Safety and Nutrition, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China; Department of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Monitoring and Management of Crop Diseases and Pest Insects, Ministry of Education, Nanjing, 210095, China.
| | - Hongxia Zheng
- State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Institute of Agro-product Safety and Nutrition, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Muhammad Junaid Rao
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, 100 Daxue Rd., 8, Nanning, Guangxi, 530004, PR China
| | - Mohsin Ali
- College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Amjad Hussain
- College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Muhammad Hamzah Saleem
- College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Yasser Nehela
- Department of Plant Pathology, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Rd, Lake Alfred, FL, 33850, USA; Department of Agricultural Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Muhammad Aamir Sohail
- College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Agha Mushtaque Ahmed
- Department of Entomology, Faculty of Crop Protection, Sindh Agriculture University Tando Jam, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Kashif Ali Kubar
- Faculty of Agriculture, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water and Marine Sciences, Uthal, 90150, Balochistan, Pakistan
| | - Shafaqat Ali
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Government College University Allama Iqbal Road, 38000, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Kamal Usman
- Agricultural Research Station, Office of VP for Research & Graduate Studies, Qatar University, 2713, Doha, Qatar
| | - Hakim Manghwar
- Lushan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiujiang, Jiangxi, 332900, China.
| | - Lei Zhou
- State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Institute of Agro-product Safety and Nutrition, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arredondo Valdés R, Delgado Ortiz JC, Beltrán Beache M, Anguiano Cabello J, Cerna Chávez E, Rodríguez Pagaza Y, Ochoa Fuentes YM. A review of techniques for detecting Huanglongbing (greening) in citrus. Can J Microbiol 2016; 62:803-811. [PMID: 27590666 DOI: 10.1139/cjm-2016-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Huanglongbing (HLB) is the most destructive disease of citrus worldwide. Monitoring of health and detection of diseases in trees is critical for sustainable agriculture. HLB symptoms are virtually the same wherever the disease occurs. The disease is caused by Candidatus Liberibacter spp., vectored by the psyllids Diaphorina citri Kuwayama and Trioza erytreae. Electron microscopy was the first technique used for HLB detection. Nowadays, scientists are working on the development of new techniques for a rapid HLB detection, as there is no sensor commercially accessible for real-time assessment of health conditions in trees. Currently, the most widely used mechanism for monitoring HLB is exploration, which is an expensive, labor-intensive, and time-consuming process. Molecular techniques such as polymerase chain reaction are used for the identification of HLB disease, which requires detailed sampling and processing procedures. Furthermore, investigations are ongoing in spectroscopic and imaging techniques, profiling of plant volatile organic compounds, and isothermal amplification. This study recognizes the need for developing a rapid, cost-effective, and reliable health-monitoring sensor that would facilitate advancements in HLB disease detection. This paper compares the benefits and limitations of these potential methods for HLB detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Arredondo Valdés
- a Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Department of Agricultural Parasitology, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, C.P. 25315, Mexico
| | - Juan C Delgado Ortiz
- a Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Department of Agricultural Parasitology, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, C.P. 25315, Mexico
| | - Mariana Beltrán Beache
- a Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Department of Agricultural Parasitology, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, C.P. 25315, Mexico
| | - Julia Anguiano Cabello
- a Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Department of Agricultural Parasitology, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, C.P. 25315, Mexico
| | - Ernesto Cerna Chávez
- a Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Department of Agricultural Parasitology, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, C.P. 25315, Mexico
| | - Yolanda Rodríguez Pagaza
- b Catedrática CONACYT-Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Department of Agricultural Parasitology, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, C.P. 25315, Mexico
| | - Yisa M Ochoa Fuentes
- a Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Department of Agricultural Parasitology, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, C.P. 25315, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thompson SM, Johnson CP, Lu AY, Frampton RA, Sullivan KL, Fiers MWEJ, Crowhurst RN, Pitman AR, Scott IAW, Wen A, Gudmestad NC, Smith GR. Genomes of 'Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum' Haplotype A from New Zealand and the United States Suggest Significant Genome Plasticity in the Species. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2015; 105:863-871. [PMID: 25822188 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-12-14-0363-fi] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
'Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum' contains two solanaceous crop-infecting haplotypes, A and B. Two haplotype A draft genomes were assembled and compared with ZC1 (haplotype B), revealing inversion and relocation genomic rearrangements, numerous single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and differences in phage-related regions. Differences in prophage location and sequence were seen both within and between haplotype comparisons. OrthoMCL and BLAST analyses identified 46 putative coding sequences present in haplotype A that were not present in haplotype B. Thirty-eight of these loci were not found in sequences from other Liberibacter spp. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays designed to amplify sequences from 15 of these loci were screened against a panel of 'Ca. L. solanacearum'-positive samples to investigate genetic diversity. Seven of the assays demonstrated within-haplotype diversity; five failed to amplify loci in at least one haplotype A sample while three assays produced amplicons from some haplotype B samples. Eight of the loci assays showed consistent A-B differentiation. Differences in genome arrangements, prophage, and qPCR results suggesting locus diversity within the haplotypes provide more evidence for genetic complexity in this emerging bacterial species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Thompson
- First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand; first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia; second, tenth, and eleventh authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108; and seventh author: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert 1025, New Zealand
| | - Chris P Johnson
- First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand; first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia; second, tenth, and eleventh authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108; and seventh author: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert 1025, New Zealand
| | - Ashley Y Lu
- First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand; first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia; second, tenth, and eleventh authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108; and seventh author: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert 1025, New Zealand
| | - Rebekah A Frampton
- First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand; first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia; second, tenth, and eleventh authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108; and seventh author: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert 1025, New Zealand
| | - Kerry L Sullivan
- First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand; first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia; second, tenth, and eleventh authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108; and seventh author: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert 1025, New Zealand
| | - Mark W E J Fiers
- First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand; first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia; second, tenth, and eleventh authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108; and seventh author: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert 1025, New Zealand
| | - Ross N Crowhurst
- First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand; first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia; second, tenth, and eleventh authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108; and seventh author: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert 1025, New Zealand
| | - Andrew R Pitman
- First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand; first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia; second, tenth, and eleventh authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108; and seventh author: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert 1025, New Zealand
| | - Ian A W Scott
- First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand; first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia; second, tenth, and eleventh authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108; and seventh author: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert 1025, New Zealand
| | - Aimin Wen
- First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand; first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia; second, tenth, and eleventh authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108; and seventh author: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert 1025, New Zealand
| | - Neil C Gudmestad
- First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand; first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia; second, tenth, and eleventh authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108; and seventh author: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert 1025, New Zealand
| | - Grant R Smith
- First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand; first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and twelfth authors: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia; second, tenth, and eleventh authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108; and seventh author: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert 1025, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|