1
|
Takeno K, Ingersoll CD, Glaviano NR, Khuder S, Norte GE. Upper extremity neuromuscular function can distinguish between individuals with and without glenohumeral labral repair. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2024; 79:102935. [PMID: 39357216 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether common measures of neuromuscular function could distinguish injury status indicated by group membership (glenohumeral labral repair, uninjured controls). 16 individuals with glenohumeral labral repair (24.1 ± 5.0 years, 36.7 ± 33.3 months after surgery) and 14 uninjured controls (23.8 ± 2.7 years) volunteered. We measured mass-normalized shoulder abduction and wrist flexion maximal voluntary isometric contraction torque (Nm/kg), motoneuron pool excitability of the flexor carpi radialis (Hoffmann reflex), corticospinal excitability of the upper trapezius, middle deltoid, and flexor carpi radialis (active motor threshold [%]) bilaterally. Receiver operator characteristic curve analyses were performed to determine if each outcome could distinguish injury status along with their outcome thresholds. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the accuracy of classification for each outcome. Our results suggest shoulder abduction torque symmetry (≤95.5 %) and corticospinal excitability for the upper trapezius (≥41.0 %) demonstrated excellent diagnostic utility. Shoulder abduction torque (≤0.71 Nm/kg) and motoneuron pool excitability (≤0.23) demonstrated acceptable diagnostic utility. Shoulder abduction torque symmetry alone was the strongest indicator, and classified injury status with 90.0 % accuracy (p < 0.01). Overall, symmetric shoulder abduction strength most accurately distinguished individuals' injury status, suggesting the utility of bilateral assessment in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsumi Takeno
- Department of Kinesiology, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, GA, USA.
| | - Christopher D Ingersoll
- Department of Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Neal R Glaviano
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Sadik Khuder
- School of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Grant E Norte
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laramée A, Léonard G, Morin M, Roch M, Gaudreault N. Neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study. Arch Physiother 2021; 11:23. [PMID: 34663474 PMCID: PMC8524890 DOI: 10.1186/s40945-021-00118-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dry needling (DN) is increasingly used for treating myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) and has shown significant effects on pain and function. This study aimed to assess feasibility of conducting a randomized sham-controlled trial and to collect preliminary data on the effects of infraspinatus DN on corticospinal excitability and mechanical pain sensitivity. METHOD This randomized feasibility study included adults with chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain and a infraspinatus MTrP. Participants were randomized to receive real DN or sham DN in the infraspinatus MTrP. Feasibility outcomes included data pertaining to recruitment, retention of participants, completeness and safety of assessment procedures. Neurophysiological and psychophysical outcomes included corticospinal excitability and mechanical pain sensitivity measured by active motor threshold (aMT) and pressure pain threshold (PPT), respectively. They were assessed at baseline, immediately after and 24 h post-intervention. RESULTS Twenty-one participants were recruited over a 6-month period. Nineteen participants completed the treatment and follow-up assessment. Motor evoked potential responses were discernible in all but 1 participant. Only 1 minor adverse event related to transcranial magnetic stimulation (mild headache) affected the measurements. No DN adverse effects were recorded in both groups. An overall completeness rate of 81% was reached, with 70% completeness in the DN group and 91% in the sham group. Data analysis revealed that real DN increased corticospinal excitability (reduced aMT) 24 h post-intervention (Mdn = - 5.96% MSO, IQR = 5.17, p = 0.04) and that sham DN triggered similar responses immediately after the intervention (Mdn = - 1.93% MSO, IQR = 1.11, p = 0.03). Increased mechanical pain sensitivity (reduced PPT) was significant only in the sham group, both immediately (Mdn = - 0.44 kg/cm2, IQR = 0.49, p = 0.01) and 24 h post-intervention (Mdn = - 0.52 kg/cm2, IQR = 1.02, p = 0.02). Changes in corticospinal excitability was positively correlated with changes in mechanical pain sensitivity in the DN group, both immediately (r = 0.77, p = 0.02) and 24 h post-intervention (r = 0.75, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION The present study demonstrates the feasibility of quantifying the neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of DN, and provides recommendations and guidelines for future studies. Moreover, it provides preliminary evidence that DN may increase corticospinal excitability of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain and that the relationship of neurophysiological and psychophysical effects is promising to better understand its mechanisms of action. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04316793 ; retrospectively registered November 3, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Laramée
- University of Sherbrooke, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Guillaume Léonard
- University of Sherbrooke, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement (CdRV), 1036 Rue Belvédère S, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Mélanie Morin
- University of Sherbrooke, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Mélanie Roch
- University of Sherbrooke, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Nathaly Gaudreault
- University of Sherbrooke, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kesar TM, Stinear JW, Wolf SL. The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2018; 36:333-348. [PMID: 29758954 DOI: 10.3233/rnn-170801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Neuroplasticity is a fundamental yet relatively unexplored process that can impact rehabilitation of lower extremity (LE) movements. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has gained widespread application as a non-invasive brain stimulation technique for evaluating neuroplasticity of the corticospinal pathway. However, a majority of TMS studies have been performed on hand muscles, with a paucity of TMS investigations focused on LE muscles. This perspective review paper proposes that there are unique methodological challenges associated with using TMS to evaluate corticospinal excitability of lower limb muscles. The challenges include: (1) the deeper location of the LE motor homunculus; (2) difficulty with targeting individual LE muscles during TMS; and (3) differences in corticospinal circuity controlling upper and lower limb muscles. We encourage future investigations that modify traditional methodological approaches to help address these challenges. Systematic TMS investigations are needed to determine the extent of overlap in corticomotor maps for different LE muscles. A simple, yet informative methodological solution involves simultaneous recordings from multiple LE muscles, which will provide the added benefit of observing how other relevant muscles co-vary in their responses during targeted TMS assessment directed toward a specific muscle. Furthermore, conventionally used TMS methods (e.g., determination of hot spot location and motor threshold) may need to be modified for TMS studies involving LE muscles. Additional investigations are necessary to determine the influence of testing posture as well as activation state of adjacent and distant LE muscles on TMS-elicited responses. An understanding of these challenges and solutions specific to LE TMS will improve the ability of neurorehabilitation clinicians to interpret TMS literature, and forge novel future directions for neuroscience research focused on elucidating neuroplasticity processes underlying locomotion and gait training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trisha M Kesar
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - James W Stinear
- Exercise Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Steven L Wolf
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Center for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Atlanta Veterans Affair Medical Center, Decatur, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anodal Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation to Enhance Rehabilitation in Individuals With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Triple-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018; 48:541-551. [PMID: 29747540 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation (a-tDCS) has been shown to enhance the effects of sensorimotor training in neurological populations. Sensorimotor training leads to reduced pain and increased function in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy. The addition of a-tDCS during a rehabilitation program centered on sensorimotor training may improve treatment outcomes in individuals with rotator cuff tendinopathy. Objective To compare 2 groups of individuals with rotator cuff tendinopathy, one receiving a rehabilitation program centered on sensorimotor training with a-tDCS and the other receiving the same rehabilitation program with sham a-tDCS. Methods In this triple-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 40 adults with rotator cuff tendinopathy participated in a 6-week rehabilitation program (8 treatments with home exercises and including sensorimotor training, patient education, and strengthening). They were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups to receive either real a-tDCS (stimulation, 1.5 mA for 30 minutes) or sham a-tDCS during the first 5 treatments. Symptoms and functional limitations (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index) of all participants were evaluated at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 weeks. Acromiohumeral distances (ultrasonographic measurement at 0°, 45°, and 60° of arm elevation) were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks. Two-way or 3-way repeated-measures analyses of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results Both groups showed statistically significant improvement in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index scores at 3, 6, and 12 weeks, and in acromiohumeral distance at 45° and 60° at 6 weeks (P<.05). No significant group-by-time interaction was observed for all outcomes (P>.43). Conclusion Results do not demonstrate any improved treatment outcomes from the addition of a-tDCS during a rehabilitation program for individuals with rotator cuff tendinopathy. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 1b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(7):541-551. Epub 10 May 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7871.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ward S, Bryant AL, Pietrosimone B, Bennell KL, Clark R, Pearce AJ. Cortical motor representation of the rectus femoris does not differ between the left and right hemisphere. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2016; 28:46-52. [PMID: 26999234 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Revised: 02/16/2016] [Accepted: 03/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) involves non-invasive magnetic stimulation of the brain, and can be used to explore the corticomotor excitability and motor representations of skeletal muscles. However there is a lack of motor mapping studies in the lower limb and few conducted in healthy cohorts. The cortical motor representations of muscles can vary between individuals in terms of center position and area despite having a general localized region within the motor cortex. It is important to characterize the normal range for these variables in healthy cohorts to be able to evaluate changes in clinical populations. TMS was used in this cross-sectional study to assess the active motor threshold (AMT) and cortical representation area for rectus femoris in 15 healthy individuals (11M/4F 27.3±5.9years). No differences were found between hemispheres (Left vs. Right P=0.130) for AMT. In terms of y-axis center position no differences were found between hemispheres (Left vs. Right P=0.539), or for the x-axis center position (Left vs. Right P=0.076). Similarly, no differences in calculated area of the motor representation were found (Left vs. Right P=0.699) indicating symmetry between hemispheres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Ward
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Adam L Bryant
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Brian Pietrosimone
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Kim L Bennell
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ross Clark
- School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, VIC, Australia
| | - Alan J Pearce
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bachasson D, Singh A, Shah S, Lane JG, Ward SR. The role of the peripheral and central nervous systems in rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24:1322-35. [PMID: 26189809 PMCID: PMC4508670 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2014] [Revised: 03/19/2015] [Accepted: 04/04/2015] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Rotator cuff (RC) disease is an extremely common condition associated with shoulder pain, reduced functional capacities, and impaired quality of life. It primarily involves alterations in tendon health and mechanical properties that can ultimately lead to tendon failure. RC tendon tears induce progressive muscle changes that have a negative impact on surgical reparability of the RC tendons and clinical outcomes. At the same time, a significant base of clinical data suggests a relatively weak relationship between RC integrity and clinical presentation, emphasizing the multifactorial aspects of RC disease. This review aims to summarize the potential contribution of peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal neural factors that may (1) exacerbate structural and functional muscle changes induced by tendon tear, (2) compromise the reversal of these changes during surgery and rehabilitation, (3) contribute to pain generation and persistence of pain, (4) impair shoulder function through reduced proprioception, kinematics, and muscle recruitment, and (5) help explain interindividual differences and response to treatment. Given the current clinical and scientific interest in peripheral nerve injury in the context of RC disease and surgery, we carefully reviewed this body of literature with a particular emphasis on suprascapular neuropathy that has generated a large number of studies in the past decade. Within this process, we highlight the gaps in current knowledge and suggest research avenues for scientists and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Bachasson
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Anshuman Singh
- Department of Orthopaedics, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sameer Shah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Samuel R. Ward
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bradnam L, Shanahan EM, Hendy K, Reed A, Skipworth T, Visser A, Lennon S. Afferent inhibition and cortical silent periods in shoulder primary motor cortex and effect of a suprascapular nerve block in people experiencing chronic shoulder pain. Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 127:769-778. [PMID: 25900020 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2014] [Revised: 03/16/2015] [Accepted: 03/23/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterise short afferent inhibition (SAI) and the cortical silent period (CSP) in the primary motor cortex representations of the infraspinatus muscle in healthy adults and people experiencing chronic shoulder pain, to determine the impact of a suprascapular nerve block (SSNB). METHODS Neurophysiological measures were obtained in 18 controls and 8 patients with chronic shoulder pain, pre and post SSNB and 1 week later. Pain intensity was assessed by a visual analogue scale. RESULTS SAI was apparent in controls (all P<0.03) and a CSP was observed which reduced in the presence of SAI (all P<0.0001). Compared to controls, shoulder pain patients demonstrated higher active motor threshold (P=0.046), less SAI (P=0.044), a longer CSP (P=0.048) and less modulation of the CSP by SAI (P=0.045). Higher motor thresholds were related to higher pain scores (P=0.009). The SSNB immediately restored SAI (P=0.013), with a positive relationship between increased SAI and reduced pain (P=0.031). The SSNB further reduced modulation of CSP by SAI at 1 week post injection (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS SAI and the CSP were present and demonstrated robust interaction in controls, which was aberrant in patients. The SSNB transiently restored SAI but had no effect on the CSP; however CSP modulation by SAI was further attenuated 1 week post injection. SIGNIFICANCE The current findings improve understanding of the neurophysiology of the shoulder motor cortex and its modulation by chronic pain. The effect of SSNB in shoulder pain patients should be interpreted with caution until proven in a larger population. Interventions that target intracortical inhibition might increase efficacy in people with chronic shoulder pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynley Bradnam
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia; Applied Brain Research Laboratory, Centre for Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia.
| | - E Michael Shanahan
- Department of Rheumatology, Repatriation General Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kirsty Hendy
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
| | - Amalia Reed
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tegan Skipworth
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anri Visser
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sheila Lennon
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alterations in central motor representation increase over time in individuals with rotator cuff tendinopathy. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 126:365-71. [PMID: 25043198 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2014] [Revised: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 05/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether rotator cuff tendinopathy leads to changes in central motor representation of a rotator cuff muscle, and to assess whether such changes are related to pain intensity, pain duration, and physical disability. METHODS Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, motor representation of infraspinatus muscle was assessed bilaterally in patients with unilateral rotator cuff tendinopathy. RESULTS Active motor threshold is significantly larger for the affected shoulder comparatively to the unaffected shoulder (n=39, p=0.01), indicating decreased corticospinal excitability on the affected side compared to unaffected side. Further, results suggest that this asymmetry in corticospinal excitability is associated with duration of pain (n=39; r=0.45; p=0.005), but not with pain intensity (n=39; r<0.03; p>0.43). In contrast with findings in other populations with musculoskeletal pain, no significant inter-hemispheric asymmetry was observed in map location (n=16; p-values ⩾ 0.91), or in the amplitude of motor responses obtained at various stimulation intensities (n=16; p=0.83). CONCLUSION Chronicity of pain, but not its intensity, appears to be a factor related to lower excitability of infraspinatus representation. SIGNIFICANCE These results support the view that while cortical reorganization correlates with magnitude of pain in neuropathic pain syndromes, it could be more related to chronicity in the case of musculoskeletal disorders.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hendy KA, Visser A, Hordacre B, Bradnam LV. Afferent Inhibition of Infraspinatus Primary Motor Cortex by Stimulation of the Suprascapular Nerve. Brain Stimul 2014; 7:338-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2013] [Accepted: 12/30/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|