1
|
McCann P, Kruoch Z, Lopez S, Malli S, Qureshi R, Li T. Interventions for Dry Eye: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. JAMA Ophthalmol 2024; 142:58-74. [PMID: 38127364 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.5751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Importance Dry eye is a common ocular disease that can have substantial morbidity. Systematic reviews provide evidence for dry eye interventions and can be useful for patients, clinicians, and clinical guideline developers. Overviews of reviews use explicit and systematic methods to synthesize findings from multiple systematic reviews, but currently, there are no overviews of systematic reviews investigating interventions for dry eye. Objective To summarize the results of reliable systematic reviews of dry eye interventions and to highlight the evidence gaps identified. Evidence Review We searched the Cochrane Eyes and Vision US satellite database and included reliable systematic reviews evaluating dry eye interventions published from 2016 to 2022. We reported the proportion of systematic reviews that were reliable with reasons for unreliability. Critical and important outcomes from reliable systematic reviews were extracted and verified. Critical outcomes included dry eye-related patient-reported outcome measures. Results were synthesized from reliable systematic reviews to provide summaries of evidence for each intervention. Evidence for each intervention was defined as conclusive or inconclusive depending on whether high-certainty evidence across systematic reviews was available according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria and whether findings reached statistical or clinical significance. Recommendations were made for further research. Findings Within the Cochrane Eyes and Vision US satellite database, 138 potentially relevant systematic reviews were identified, 71 were considered eligible, and 26 (37%) were assessed as reliable. Among reliable systematic reviews, no conclusive evidence was identified for any dry eye intervention. Inconclusive evidence suggested that environmental modifications, dietary modifications, artificial tears and lubricants, punctal occlusion, intense pulsed light therapy, vectored thermal pulsation therapy (Lipiflow), topical corticosteroids, topical cyclosporine A, topical secretagogues, and autologous serum may be effective. Only unreliable systematic reviews evaluated lifitegrast, oral antibiotics, and moisture chamber devices. Conclusions and Relevance This overview of systematic reviews found some evidence that dry eye interventions may be effective, but no conclusive evidence was available. The conduct and reporting of most systematic reviews for dry eye interventions warrant improvement, and reliable systematic reviews are needed to evaluate lifitegrast, oral antibiotics, and moisture chamber devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul McCann
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Zanna Kruoch
- College of Optometry, Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, Provo, Utah
| | - Sarah Lopez
- Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Shreya Malli
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Riaz Qureshi
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Denver
| | - Tianjing Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Denver
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McCullock SP, Scrivano RM. The effectiveness of mental illness stigma-reduction interventions: A systematic meta-review of meta-analyses. Clin Psychol Rev 2023; 100:102242. [PMID: 36563518 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The high prevalence of stigma toward mental illnesses contributes to the worsened health and quality of life for people with mental illnesses. Different stigmas (e.g., public, self) lead to social discrimination, social isolation, and reduce the likelihood that people with mental illnesses receive adequate treatment for their conditions. In response to this, numerous social interventions have been developed to help combat the spread of stigma. Subsequently, researchers have conducted meta-analyses to determine the effectiveness of different interventions for reducing stigma toward mental illness. To date, no efforts have been made to synthesize these meta-analyses to identify gaps in the stigma-reduction literature, assess the quality of extant literature, and to identify trends in programming efforts. The present study conducted a systematic meta-review of 19 meta-analyses, drawing from the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework, to address these gaps. Results showed that the included meta-analyses were of relatively poor quality and that interventions primarily addressed either public or self-stigma, while overlooking other stigmas. Further, meta-analyses primarily assessed the effects of contact-promotion or educational intervention strategies. There was little evidence to suggest that interventions were effective longitudinally. Implications for future research and intervention development are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth P McCullock
- Division on Addiction, Cambridge Health Alliance, Malden, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Rachel M Scrivano
- College of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khatib MN, Gaidhane A, Upadhyay S, Telrandhe S, Saxena D, Simkhada PP, Sawleshwarkar S, Quazi SZ. Interventions for promoting and optimizing breastfeeding practices: An overview of systematic review. Front Public Health 2023; 11:984876. [PMID: 36761137 PMCID: PMC9904444 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.984876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Optimal breastfeeding (BF) practices are essential for child survival and proper growth and development. The purpose of this overview is to evaluate the effectiveness of different interventions for promoting and optimizing breastfeeding. Methods We included systematic reviews (SRs) [including trials from Low-Income (LICs) and Low Middle-Income countries (LMICs)] that have evaluated the effect of various interventions for promoting and optimizing breastfeeding and excluded non-systematic reviews, and SRs based on observational studies. We searched various electronic databases. We followed the standard methodology as suggested by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Two sets of reviewers undertook screening followed by data extraction and assessment of the methodological quality of included SRs. Result We identified and screened 1,002 Cochrane SRs and included six SRs in this overview. Included SRs reported only two of the primary outcomes, early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) and/or exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). None of the included SR reported continued BF up to 2 years of age. The results were evaluated using two major comparisons groups: BF intervention against routine care and one type of BF intervention vs. other types of BF intervention. Overall results from included SRs showed that there were improvements in the rates of EIBF and EBF among women who received BF intervention such as BF education sessions and support compared to those women who received only standard care. However, BF intervention via mobile devices showed no improvements. In Target Client Communication (TCC) via mobile devices intervention group, no significant improvements were reported in BF practices, and also the reported evidence was of very low certainty. Conclusion Community Based Intervention Packages (CBIP) delivered to pregnant and reproductive-age women during their Antenatal care (ANC) and/or Postnatal care (PNC) periods by Ancillary Nurse-Midwives reported the highest improvement in EIBF compared to women who received standard care. However, insufficient evidence was reported to suggest that BF intervention showed improvements in EBF in both the comparison groups. This overview highlighted the gaps in primary research regarding the uncertainty about the settings such as LICs or LMICs, lack of evidence from LMICs, and also identified gaps in the availability of reliable up-to-date SRs on the effects of several BF interventions to promote and optimize practices. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020174998, PROSPERO [CRD42020174998].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib
- Global Evidence Synthesis Initiative, Division of Evidence Synthesis, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India
| | - Abhay Gaidhane
- Centre of One Health, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shilpa Upadhyay
- Department of Research and Development, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shital Telrandhe
- Department of Research and Development, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deepak Saxena
- i Health Consortium, Department of Epidemiology, Indian Institute of Public Health, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
| | - Padam Prasad Simkhada
- Global Consortium of Public Health Research, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom
| | - Shailendra Sawleshwarkar
- Postgraduate Coursework Programs, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases (Sydney ID), University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Syed Zahiruddin Quazi
- South Asia Infant Feeding Research Network (SAIFRN), Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chapman E, Pantoja T, Kuchenmüller T, Sharma T, Terry RF. Assessing the impact of knowledge communication and dissemination strategies targeted at health policy-makers and managers: an overview of systematic reviews. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:140. [PMID: 34865640 PMCID: PMC8645346 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00780-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of research evidence as an input for health decision-making is a need for most health systems. There are a number of approaches for promoting evidence use at different levels of the health system, but knowledge of their effectiveness is still scarce. The objective of this overview was to evaluate the effectiveness of knowledge communication and dissemination interventions, strategies or approaches targeting policy-makers and health managers. Methods This overview of systematic reviews used systematic review methods and was conducted according to a predefined and published protocol. A comprehensive electronic search of 13 databases and a manual search in four websites were conducted. Both published and unpublished reviews in English, Spanish or Portuguese were included. A narrative synthesis was undertaken, and effectiveness statements were developed, informed by the evidence identified. Results We included 27 systematic reviews. Three studies included only a communication strategy, while eight only included dissemination strategies, and the remaining 16 included both. None of the selected reviews provided “sufficient evidence” for any of the strategies, while four provided some evidence for three communication and four dissemination strategies. Regarding communication strategies, the use of tailored and targeted messages seemed to successfully lead to changes in the decision-making practices of the target audience. Regarding dissemination strategies, interventions that aimed at improving only the reach of evidence did not have an impact on its use in decisions, while interventions aimed at enhancing users’ ability to use and apply evidence had a positive effect on decision-making processes. Multifaceted dissemination strategies also demonstrated the potential for changing knowledge about evidence but not its implementation in decision-making. Conclusions There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions targeting health managers and policy-makers, as well as the mechanisms required for achieving impact. More studies are needed that are informed by theoretical frameworks or specific tools and using robust methods, standardized outcome measures and clear descriptions of the interventions. We found that passive communication increased access to evidence but had no effect on uptake. Some evidence indicated that the use of targeted messages, knowledge-brokering and user training was effective in promoting evidence use by managers and policy-makers. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00780-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tomas Pantoja
- Family Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Tanja Kuchenmüller
- Evidence to Policy and Impact, Research for Health - Science Division - World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Robert F Terry
- Manager Research Policy, The Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kroon D, Steutel NF, Vermeulen H, Tabbers MM, Benninga MA, Langendam MW, van Dulmen SA. Effectiveness of interventions aiming to reduce inappropriate drug prescribing: an overview of interventions. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/jphsr/rmab038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Inappropriate prescribing of drugs is associated with unnecessary harms for patients and healthcare costs. Interventions to reduce these prescriptions are widely studied, yet the effectiveness of different types of interventions remains unclear. Therefore, we provide an overview regarding the effectiveness of intervention types that aim to reduce inappropriate drug prescriptions, unrestricted by target drugs, population or setting.
Methods
For this overview, systematic reviews (SRs) were used as the source for original studies. EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched from inception to August 2018. All SRs aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce inappropriate prescribing of drugs were eligible for inclusion. The SRs and their original studies were screened for eligibility. Interventions of the original studies were categorized by type of intervention. The percentage of interventions showing a significant reduction of inappropriate prescribing were reported per intervention category.
Key findings
Thirty-two SRs were included, which provided 319 unique interventions. Overall, 61.4% of these interventions showed a significant reduction in inappropriate prescribing of drugs. Strategies that were most frequently effective in reducing inappropriate prescribing were multifaceted interventions (73.2%), followed by interventions containing additional diagnostic tests (antibiotics) (70.4%), computer interventions (69.2%), audit and feedback (66.7%), patient-mediated interventions (62.5%) and multidisciplinary (team) approach (57.1%). The least frequently effective intervention was an education for healthcare professionals (50.0%).
Conclusion
The majority of the interventions were effective in reducing inappropriate prescribing of drugs. Multifaceted interventions most frequently showed a significant reduction of inappropriate prescribing. Education for healthcare professionals is the most frequently included intervention in this overview, yet this category is least frequently effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniëlle Kroon
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nina F Steutel
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health institute, The Netherlands
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester Vermeulen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health and Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Merit M Tabbers
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A Benninga
- Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda W Langendam
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health institute, The Netherlands
| | - Simone A van Dulmen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Machado MO, Kang NYC, Tai F, Sambhi RDS, Berk M, Carvalho AF, Chada LP, Merola JF, Piguet V, Alavi A. Measuring fatigue: a meta-review. Int J Dermatol 2020; 60:1053-1069. [PMID: 33301180 DOI: 10.1111/ijd.15341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
There is a lack of validated tools to measure fatigue in patients with inflammatory skin, neuropsychiatric, and medical disorders. The use of nonvalidated tools may compromise the quality of data. The purpose of this meta-review was to evaluate existing fatigue scales commonly used to assess fatigue in other inflammatory conditions and to identify if there are scales that have been validated in dermatologic conditions. The PubMed/MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases were systematically searched from inception through March 10, 2020, in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Validated tools were identified and assessed according to their main measurement properties. The literature search identified 403 references, and eight studies were eligible and assessed in this review. The unidimensional fatigue scales included were the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F), Brief Fatigue Inventory, Fatigue Severity Scale, Numerical Rating Scale - Fatigue, and Visual Analog Scale - Fatigue. The multidimensional fatigue scales found were the Checklist Individual Strength, Chalder Fatigue Scale, Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory Scale, and Piper Fatigue Scale. To measure fatigue, a brief scale with the ability to detect change is needed as there is a growing interest in evaluating this dimension of treatment response. In addition, a good content validity is also needed. From this systematic review, none of the selected scales have had content validation, even though the FACIT was validated in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Validation studies in specific disorders are urgently warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrela O Machado
- Division of Dermatology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Felicia Tai
- BMSc Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Raman D S Sambhi
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Berk
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Deakin University, IMPACT - the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Andre F Carvalho
- Deakin University, IMPACT - the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lourdes P Chada
- International Dermatology Outcome Measures, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph F Merola
- Department of Dermatology and Department of Medicine, Divison of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vincent Piguet
- Division of Dermatology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Afsaneh Alavi
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Siegrist J, Wege N. Adverse Psychosocial Work Environments and Depression-A Narrative Review of Selected Theoretical Models. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11:66. [PMID: 32174849 PMCID: PMC7056901 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Far-reaching progress of treatment and prevention of depressive disorders is still limited, mainly due to the multifactorial determinants of these disorders and the restricted knowledge of their aetiology. Stressful socio-environmental conditions represent one of the multifactorial determinants, and in view of the centrality of work and employment for human well-being, research on health-adverse psychosocial work environments turned out to be a promising line of scientific inquiry. During the past three decades, respective research focused mainly on three theoretical models of adverse psychosocial work and their measurement in prospective epidemiologic studies, termed "demand-control," "effort-reward imbalance," and "organizational injustice." This report provides a review of current evidence on their associations with depression, based on several systematic reviews and updated by most recent publications. Moreover, it discusses the conceptual and methodological strengths and weaknesses of these associations. In summary, the results of more than 40 cohort studies from a variety of Western modern societies confirm that stressful work in terms of these models is associated with a moderately increased risk of subsequent onset of depression. While this knowledge is considered robust enough to instruct efforts of primary and secondary prevention, several methodological challenges still need to be resolved by future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Siegrist
- Centre for Health and Society, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Natalia Wege
- Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Martinez-Lacoba R, Pardo-Garcia I, Amo-Saus E, Escribano-Sotos F. Mediterranean diet and health outcomes: a systematic meta-review. Eur J Public Health 2019; 28:955-961. [PMID: 29992229 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Mediterranean diet (MeDi) is considered a healthy dietary pattern, and greater adherence to this diet may improve health status. It also may reduce the social and economic costs of diet-related illnesses. This meta-review aims to summarize, synthesize and organize the effects of MeDi pattern on different health outcomes. Methods This meta-review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. Two researchers screened all the records to eliminate any duplicate, and they selected the articles to be fully reviewed. A third researcher was consulted to resolve discrepancies and so reach a consensus agreement. Results Thirty-three articles were included, nine were systematic reviews and twenty-four were meta-analyses. Most of the diseases analysed are catalogued as non-communicable diseases (NCD), and the impact of these in populations may have major financial consequences for healthcare spending and national income. The results showed that the MeDi may improve health status, and it also may reduce total lifetime costs. Conclusion MeDi has been shown to be a healthy dietary pattern that may reduce risk related to NCD. The effect is larger if the pattern is combined with physical activity, and tobacco and excessive alcohol consumption are avoided. Promoting the MeDi as a healthy dietary pattern presents challenges which need the collaboration of all levels of society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Martinez-Lacoba
- School of Economics and Business Administration, Castilla-La Mancha University (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.,Sociosanitary Research Centre, Castilla-La Mancha University (UCLM), Albacete, Spain
| | - Isabel Pardo-Garcia
- School of Economics and Business Administration, Castilla-La Mancha University (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.,Sociosanitary Research Centre, Castilla-La Mancha University (UCLM), Albacete, Spain
| | - Elisa Amo-Saus
- School of Economics and Business Administration, Castilla-La Mancha University (UCLM), Albacete, Spain
| | - Francisco Escribano-Sotos
- School of Economics and Business Administration, Castilla-La Mancha University (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.,Sociosanitary Research Centre, Castilla-La Mancha University (UCLM), Albacete, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lunny C, Brennan SE, McDonald S, McKenzie JE. Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2-risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence. Syst Rev 2018; 7:159. [PMID: 30314530 PMCID: PMC6186052 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0784-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overviews of systematic reviews (SRs) attempt to systematically retrieve and summarise the results of multiple systematic reviews. This is the second of two papers from a study aiming to develop a comprehensive evidence map of the methods used in overviews. Our objectives were to (a) develop a framework of methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews (stage I)-the Methods for Overviews of Reviews (MOoR) framework-and (b) to create an evidence map by mapping studies that have evaluated overview methods to the framework (stage II). In the first paper, we reported findings for the four initial steps of an overview (specification of purpose, objectives and scope; eligibility criteria; search methods; data extraction). In this paper, we report the remaining steps: assessing risk of bias; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessing certainty of the evidence arising from the overview. METHODS In stage I, we identified cross-sectional studies, guidance documents and commentaries that described methods proposed for, or used in, overviews. Based on these studies, we developed a framework of possible methods for overviews, categorised by the steps in conducting an overview. Multiple iterations of the framework were discussed and refined by all authors. In stage II, we identified studies evaluating methods and mapped these evaluations to the framework. RESULTS Forty-two stage I studies described methods relevant to one or more of the latter steps of an overview. Six studies evaluating methods were included in stage II. These mapped to steps involving (i) the assessment of risk of bias (RoB) in SRs (two SRs and three primary studies, all reporting evaluation of RoB tools) and (ii) the synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings (one primary study evaluating methods for measuring overlap). CONCLUSION Many methods have been described for use in the latter steps in conducting an overview; however, evaluation and guidance for applying these methods is sparse. The exception is RoB assessment, for which a multitude of tools exist-several with sufficient evaluation and guidance to recommend their use. Evaluation of other methods is required to provide a comprehensive evidence map.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Lunny
- Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sue E. Brennan
- Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Steve McDonald
- Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joanne E. McKenzie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Duan-Porter W, Martinson BC, Greer N, Taylor BC, Ullman K, McKenzie L, Rosebush C, MacDonald R, Falde S, Wilt TJ. Evidence Review-Social Determinants of Health for Veterans. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33:1785-1795. [PMID: 30030735 PMCID: PMC6153229 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4566-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is committed to providing high-quality care and addressing health disparities for vulnerable Veterans. To meet these goals, VA policymakers need guidance on how to address social determinants in operations planning and day-to-day clinical care for Veterans. METHOD MEDLINE (OVID), CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Sociological Abstracts were searched from inception to January 2017. Additional articles were suggested by peer reviewers and/or found through search of work associated with US and VA cohorts. Eligible articles compared Veterans vs non-Veterans, and/or Veterans engaged with those not engaged in VA healthcare. Our evidence maps summarized study characteristics, social determinant(s) addressed, and whether health behaviors, health services utilization, and/or health outcomes were examined. Qualitative syntheses and quality assessment were performed for articles on rurality, trauma exposure, and sexual orientation. RESULTS We screened 7242 citations and found 131 eligible articles-99 compared Veterans vs non-Veterans, and 40 included engaged vs non-engaged Veterans. Most articles were cross-sectional and addressed socioeconomic factors (e.g., education and income). Fewer articles addressed rurality (N = 20), trauma exposure (N = 17), or sexual orientation (N = 2); none examined gender identity. We found no differences in rural residence between Veterans and non-Veterans, nor between engaged and non-engaged Veterans (moderate strength evidence). There was insufficient evidence for role of rurality in health behaviors, health services utilization, or health outcomes. Trauma exposures, including from events preceding military service, were more prevalent for Veterans vs non-Veterans and for engaged vs non-engaged Veterans (low-strength evidence); exposures were associated with smoking (low-strength evidence). DISCUSSION Little published literature exists on some emerging social determinants. We found no differences in rural residence between our groups of interest, but trauma exposure was higher in Veterans (vs non-Veterans) and engaged (vs non-engaged). We recommend consistent measures for social determinants, clear conceptual frameworks, and analytic strategies that account for the complex relationships between social determinants and health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Duan-Porter
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Brian C Martinson
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
- HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Nancy Greer
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Brent C Taylor
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kristen Ullman
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Lauren McKenzie
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Christina Rosebush
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Roderick MacDonald
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Samuel Falde
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Timothy J Wilt
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moretti A, Gimigliano F, Arienti C, Pollet J, Kiekens C, Negrini S. The Cochrane Rehabilitation eBook: a knowledge translation tool to transfer evidence to different rehabilitation audiences. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2018; 54:808-810. [PMID: 30220116 DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.18.05406-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Systematic reviews are a powerful method for summarizing and synthesizing evidence and create a methodological opportunity for preparing data integration tables to enable review-level synthesis of the evidence. One of the main tasks of Cochrane Rehabilitation is to make it possible to improve the application of evidence-based clinical practice by all rehabilitation professionals, and to facilitate policy-makers in decision-making according to the best evidence. In this context arises the need to diffuse the high-quality information of Cochrane Systematic Reviews (CSR), through synthetic and easy-to-use messages for the different rehabilitation audiences. Cochrane Rehabilitation has recently launched the production of an eBook including all the evidence coming from the CSR tagged by its Review Committee as of rehabilitation interest with the final aim to enhance the application of evidence in clinical practice, medical education, health system policies, and in the community. This will be a powerful tool for the dissemination of evidence-based practice, education and knowledge, as well as to support political decisions for both effective organization and resource allocation in rehabilitation field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antimo Moretti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Gimigliano
- Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Joel Pollet
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy -
| | - Carlotte Kiekens
- KU Leuven, PRM, Leuven, Belgium
- University Hospitals Leuven, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stefano Negrini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lunny C, Brennan SE, McDonald S, McKenzie JE. Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1-purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction. Syst Rev 2017; 6:231. [PMID: 29162130 PMCID: PMC5698938 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0617-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2016] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overviews of systematic reviews attempt to systematically retrieve and summarise the results of multiple systematic reviews. Methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews are in their infancy. To date, there has been no evidence map of the methods used in overviews, thus making it difficult to determine the gaps and priorities for methods research. Our objectives were to develop and populate a comprehensive framework of methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews (stage I) and to create an evidence map by mapping studies that have evaluated overview methods to the framework (stage II). METHODS We searched methods collections (e.g. Cochrane Methodology Register, Meth4ReSyn library, AHRQ Effective Health Care Program) to identify eligible studies for both stages of this research. In stage I, cross-sectional studies, guidance documents and commentaries that described methods proposed for, or used in, overviews were used to develop and populate the framework of methods. Drafts and multiple iterations of the framework were discussed and refined by all authors. In stage II, we identified and described studies evaluating overview methods and mapped these evaluations to the framework. RESULTS In this paper, we present results for the four initial steps of conducting an overview: (a) specification of the purpose, objectives and scope, (b) specification of the eligibility criteria, (c) search methods and (d) data extraction. Twenty-nine studies mentioned or described methods relevant to one or more of these steps. In the developed framework, identified methods and approaches were grouped according to the steps an overview author would need to undertake. Fifteen studies evaluated identified methods, all of which mapped to the search methods step. These studies either reported the development and evaluation of a new search filter to retrieve systematic reviews or compared the performance of multiple filters. CONCLUSION Gaps in the evaluation of methods were found for the majority of steps in the framework. More empirical studies are needed to evaluate the methods outlined and provide a comprehensive evidence map. The framework is useful for planning these evaluations and for planning methods required to deal with challenges that arise when conducting an overview.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Lunny
- Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sue E Brennan
- Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Steve McDonald
- Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joanne E McKenzie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Harvey SB, Modini M, Joyce S, Milligan-Saville JS, Tan L, Mykletun A, Bryant RA, Christensen H, Mitchell PB. Can work make you mentally ill? A systematic meta-review of work-related risk factors for common mental health problems. Occup Environ Med 2017; 74:301-310. [DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 312] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2016] [Revised: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
14
|
Bashi N, Karunanithi M, Fatehi F, Ding H, Walters D. Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e18. [PMID: 28108430 PMCID: PMC5291866 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2016] [Revised: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Many systematic reviews exist on the use of remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions to improve clinical outcomes and psychological well-being of patients with heart failure. However, research is broadly distributed from simple telephone-based to complex technology-based interventions. The scope and focus of such evidence also vary widely, creating challenges for clinicians who seek information on the effect of RPM interventions. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of RPM interventions on the health outcomes of patients with heart failure by synthesizing review-level evidence. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2015. We screened reviews based on relevance to RPM interventions using criteria developed for this overview. Independent authors screened, selected, and extracted information from systematic reviews. AMSTAR (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) was used to assess the methodological quality of individual reviews. We used standardized language to summarize results across reviews and to provide final statements about intervention effectiveness. Results A total of 19 systematic reviews met our inclusion criteria. Reviews consisted of RPM with diverse interventions such as telemonitoring, home telehealth, mobile phone–based monitoring, and videoconferencing. All-cause mortality and heart failure mortality were the most frequently reported outcomes, but others such as quality of life, rehospitalization, emergency department visits, and length of stay were also reported. Self-care and knowledge were less commonly identified. Conclusions Telemonitoring and home telehealth appear generally effective in reducing heart failure rehospitalization and mortality. Other interventions, including the use of mobile phone–based monitoring and videoconferencing, require further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazli Bashi
- Australian eHealth Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Farhad Fatehi
- Australian eHealth Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic Of Iran
| | - Hang Ding
- Australian eHealth Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Darren Walters
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Department of Cardiology, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Medley N, Vogel JP, Care A, Alfirevic Z. Interventions during pregnancy to prevent spontaneous preterm birth: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Hippokratia 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Medley
- The University of Liverpool; Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health; First Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust Crown Street Liverpool UK L8 7SS
| | - Joshua P Vogel
- World Health Organization; UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research; Avenue Appia 20 Geneva Switzerland CH-1211
| | - Angharad Care
- The University of Liverpool; Department of Women's and Children's Health; First Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust Crown Street Liverpool UK L8 7SS
| | - Zarko Alfirevic
- The University of Liverpool; Department of Women's and Children's Health; First Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust Crown Street Liverpool UK L8 7SS
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ballard M, Montgomery P. Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four-item checklist. Res Synth Methods 2017; 8:92-108. [PMID: 28074553 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Revised: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the conditions under which employing an overview of systematic reviews is likely to lead to a high risk of bias. STUDY DESIGN To synthesise existing guidance concerning overview practice, a scoping review was conducted. Four electronic databases were searched with a pre-specified strategy (PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015027592) ending October 2015. Included studies needed to describe or develop overview methodology. Data were narratively synthesised to delineate areas highlighted as outstanding challenges or where methodological recommendations conflict. RESULTS Twenty-four papers met the inclusion criteria. There is emerging debate regarding overlapping systematic reviews; systematic review scope; quality of included research; updating; and synthesizing and reporting results. While three functions for overviews have been proposed-identify gaps, explore heterogeneity, summarize evidence-overviews cannot perform the first; are unlikely to achieve the second and third simultaneously; and can only perform the third under specific circumstances. Namely, when identified systematic reviews meet the following four conditions: (1) include primary trials that do not substantially overlap, (2) match overview scope, (3) are of high methodological quality, and (4) are up-to-date. CONCLUSION Considering the intended function of proposed overviews with the corresponding methodological conditions may improve the quality of this burgeoning publication type. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Ballard
- Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Montgomery
- Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Duan-Porter W, Goldstein KM, McDuffie JR, Hughes JM, Clowse MEB, Klap RS, Masilamani V, Allen LaPointe NM, Nagi A, Gierisch JM, Williams JW. Reporting of Sex Effects by Systematic Reviews on Interventions for Depression, Diabetes, and Chronic Pain. Ann Intern Med 2016; 165:184-93. [PMID: 27111355 PMCID: PMC6611166 DOI: 10.7326/m15-2877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Systematic reviews (SRs) have the potential to contribute uniquely to the evaluation of sex and gender differences (termed "sex effects"). This article describes the reporting of sex effects by SRs on interventions for depression, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic pain conditions (chronic low back pain, knee osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia). It includes SRs published since 1 October 2009 that evaluate medications, behavioral interventions, exercise, quality improvement, and some condition-specific treatments. The reporting of sex effects by primary randomized, controlled trials is also examined. Of 313 eligible SRs (86 for depression, 159 for type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 68 for chronic pain), few (n = 29) reported sex effects. Most SRs reporting sex effects used metaregression, whereas 9 SRs used subgroup analysis or individual-patient data meta-analysis. The proportion of SRs reporting the sex distribution of primary studies varied from a low of 31% (n = 8) for low back pain to a high of 68% (n = 23) for fibromyalgia. Primary randomized, controlled trials also infrequently reported sex effects, and most lacked an adequate sample size to examine them. Therefore, all SRs should report the proportion of women enrolled in primary studies and evaluate sex effects using appropriate methods whenever power is adequate.
Collapse
|
18
|
Modini M, Joyce S, Mykletun A, Christensen H, Bryant RA, Mitchell PB, Harvey SB. The mental health benefits of employment: Results of a systematic meta-review. Australas Psychiatry 2016; 24:331-6. [PMID: 26773063 DOI: 10.1177/1039856215618523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 181] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The literature on mental health in the workplace largely focuses on the negative impacts of work and how work may contribute to the development of mental disorders. The potential mental health benefits of employment have received less attention. METHOD A systematic search of reviews or meta-analyses that consider the benefits of work in regards to mental health was undertaken using academic databases. All relevant reviews were subjected to a quality appraisal. RESULTS Eleven reviews were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria, with four deemed to be of at least moderate quality. The available evidence supports the proposition that work can be beneficial for an employee's well-being, particularly if good-quality supervision is present and there are favourable workplace conditions. The benefits of work are most apparent when compared with the well-documented detrimental mental health effects of unemployment. CONCLUSIONS The potential positive effects of good work and the role work can play in facilitating recovery from an illness and enhancing mental well-being need to be highlighted and promoted more widely. Future research should aim to further investigate what constitutes a 'good' workplace or a 'good' job in terms of mental health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Modini
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sadhbh Joyce
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Arnstein Mykletun
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway; Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway, and; The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø; Norway, and; School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Richard A Bryant
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Philip B Mitchell
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, and; Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Samuel B Harvey
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, and; Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, and; St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ryan R, Hill S. Making rational choices about how best to support consumers' use of medicines: a perspective review. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2016; 7:159-64. [PMID: 27493719 DOI: 10.1177/2042098616651198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Inappropriate medicine use and polypharmacy create significant challenges for consumers and the health systems they live in, worldwide. In this review, we describe the evidence underpinning interventions directed primarily at healthcare consumers, including information provision, pharmacist-delivered interventions and practical supports, such as reminders to improve outcomes related to medicines. We identify a relatively small number of strategies that seem effective or promising: self-monitoring and self-management programmes, simplified dosing regimens and pharmacist-delivered interventions such as medication review. These interventions could be applied in practice to address some of the problems associated with inappropriate use of medicines, multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The evidence also indicates that success with many strategies is not consistent, suggesting that understanding the individual's context and their preferences will also be important for improving medicines' use. In addition, some strategies in current use are ineffective. Taken together, we argue that the evidence should inform deliberate, rational decisions between strategies to support consumers in using medicines safely and effectively. Future medicine-use research should likewise build rationally and constructively on what is known about promising interventions, avoiding duplication of past research, and working to help consumers negotiate the many challenges presented by polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Ryan
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia
| | - Sophie Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Goode AP, Coeytaux RR, McDuffie J, Duan-Porter W, Sharma P, Mennella H, Nagi A, Williams JW. An evidence map of yoga for low back pain. Complement Ther Med 2016; 25:170-7. [PMID: 27062965 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2015] [Revised: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Yoga is being increasingly studied as a treatment strategy for a variety of different clinical conditions, including low back pain (LBP). We set out to conduct an evidence map of yoga for the treatment, prevention and recurrence of acute or chronic low back pain (cLBP). METHODS We searched Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCT), systematic reviews or planned studies on the treatment or prevention of acute back pain or cLBP. Two independent reviewers screened papers for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies. RESULTS Three eligible systematic reviews were identified that included 10 RCTs (n=956) that evaluated yoga for non-specific cLBP. We did not identify additional RCTs beyond those included in the systematic reviews. Our search of ClinicalTrials.gov identified one small (n=10) unpublished trial and one large (n=320) planned clinical trial. The most recent good quality systematic review indicated significant effects for short- and long-term pain reduction (n=6 trials; standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.48; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.31; I(2)=0% and n=5; SMD -0.33; 95% CI, -0.59 to -0.07; I(2)=48%, respectively). Long-term effects for back specific disability were also identified (n=5; SMD -0.35; 95% CI, -0.55 to -0.15; I(2)=20%). No studies were identified evaluating yoga for prevention or treatment of acute LBP. CONCLUSION Evidence suggests benefit of yoga in midlife adults with non-specific cLBP for short- and long-term pain and back-specific disability, but the effects of yoga for health-related quality of life, well- being and acute LBP are uncertain. Without additional studies, further systematic reviews are unlikely to be informative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam P Goode
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 2200 West Main Street, Durham, NC 27705, United States; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 2400 Pratt Street, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
| | - Remy R Coeytaux
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 2400 Pratt Street, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
| | - Jennifer McDuffie
- Durham Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care and Evidence Synthesis Program, Durham VA Medical Center, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, United States; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 411 West Chapel Hill Street, Suite 500, Durham, NC 27701, United States.
| | - Wei Duan-Porter
- Durham Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care and Evidence Synthesis Program, Durham VA Medical Center, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, United States; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 411 West Chapel Hill Street, Suite 500, Durham, NC 27701, United States.
| | - Poonam Sharma
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 411 West Chapel Hill Street, Suite 500, Durham, NC 27701, United States.
| | - Hillary Mennella
- Duke University School of Nursing, 307 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
| | - Avishek Nagi
- Durham Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care and Evidence Synthesis Program, Durham VA Medical Center, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
| | - John W Williams
- Durham Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care and Evidence Synthesis Program, Durham VA Medical Center, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, United States; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 411 West Chapel Hill Street, Suite 500, Durham, NC 27701, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Joyce S, Modini M, Christensen H, Mykletun A, Bryant R, Mitchell PB, Harvey SB. Workplace interventions for common mental disorders: a systematic meta-review. Psychol Med 2016; 46:683-697. [PMID: 26620157 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291715002408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 258] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Depression and anxiety disorders are the leading cause of sickness absence and long-term work incapacity in most developed countries. The present study aimed to carry out a systematic meta-review examining the effectiveness of workplace mental health interventions, defined as any intervention that a workplace may either initiate or facilitate that aims to prevent, treat or rehabilitate a worker with a diagnosis of depression, anxiety or both. Relevant reviews were identified via a detailed systematic search of academic and grey literature databases. All articles were subjected to a rigorous quality appraisal using the AMSTAR assessment. Of the 5179 articles identified, 140 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 20 were deemed to be of moderate or high quality. Together, these reviews analysed 481 primary research studies. Moderate evidence was identified for two primary prevention interventions; enhancing employee control and promoting physical activity. Stronger evidence was found for CBT-based stress management although less evidence was found for other secondary prevention interventions, such as counselling. Strong evidence was also found against the routine use of debriefing following trauma. Tertiary interventions with a specific focus on work, such as exposure therapy and CBT-based and problem-focused return-to-work programmes, had a strong evidence base for improving symptomology and a moderate evidence base for improving occupational outcomes. Overall, these findings demonstrate there are empirically supported interventions that workplaces can utilize to aid in the prevention of common mental illness as well as facilitating the recovery of employees diagnosed with depression and/or anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Joyce
- School of Psychiatry,University of New South Wales,Sydney,NSW,Australia
| | - M Modini
- School of Psychiatry,University of New South Wales,Sydney,NSW,Australia
| | | | - A Mykletun
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health,University of Bergen,Norway
| | - R Bryant
- School of Psychology,University of New South Wales,Sydney,NSW,Australia
| | - P B Mitchell
- School of Psychiatry,University of New South Wales,Sydney,NSW,Australia
| | - S B Harvey
- School of Psychiatry,University of New South Wales,Sydney,NSW,Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
[Practical experience with overviews of reviews--valuable decision aid or academic exercise?]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2015; 109:300-8. [PMID: 26354130 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2015] [Revised: 06/12/2015] [Accepted: 06/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The "overview of reviews" has evolved as a method to aggregate information from systematic reviews. Based on research projects conducted by two Austrian institutions, this article aims to point out methods and perceived strengths and limitations of overviews of reviews and to discuss their application and constraints for different healthcare settings. The six analysed projects differed in their objectives as well as in the corresponding methodology. We identified the following strengths of the overviews of reviews performed: the overview of the evidence base on an issue, the rapid detection of the results of numerous reviews, the demonstration of evidence gaps and potential savings in time and resources. At the same time, the methodology could lead to a loss of information, limited relevance and to uncertainties regarding the robustness of the overall results. However, the heterogeneity of the methods used shows that the development of methods for overviews of reviews is still ongoing. Whether overviews of reviews provide valuable decision support depends on the research question and realistic expectations towards the method.
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study describes evidence of yoga's effectiveness for depressive disorders, general anxiety disorder (GAD), panic disorder (PD), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults. We also address adverse events associated with yoga. METHODS We searched multiple electronic databases for systematic reviews (SRs) published between 2008 and July 2014, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) not identified in eligible SRs, and ongoing RCTs registered with ClincalTrials.gov. RESULTS We identified 1 SR on depression, 1 for adverse events, and 3 addressing multiple conditions. The high-quality depression SR included 12 RCTs (n = 619) that showed improved short-term depressive symptoms (standardized mean difference, -0.69, 95% confidence interval, -0.99 to -0.39), but there was substantial variability (I2 = 86%) and a high risk of bias for 9 studies. Three SRs addressing multiple conditions identified 4 nonrandomized studies (n = 174) for GAD/PD and 1 RCT (n = 8) and 2 nonrandomized studies (n = 22) for PTSD. We separately found 1 RCT (n = 13) for GAD and 2 RCTs (n = 102) for PTSD. Collectively, these studies were inconclusive for the effectiveness of yoga in treating GAD/PD and PTSD. The high-quality SR for adverse events included 37 primary reports (n = 76) in which inversion postures were most often implicated. We found 5 ongoing trials (3 for PTSD). CONCLUSIONS Yoga may improve short-term depressive symptoms, but evidence for GAD, PD, and PTSD remain inconclusive.
Collapse
|
24
|
Ryan RE, Weir M, Leslie B, Worswick J, Lowe DB, Hill SJ. Evidence on Optimal Prescribing and Medicines Use for Decision Makers: Scope and Application of the
Rx for Change
Database. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2055-2335.2011.tb00107.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca E Ryan
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, Australian Institute for Primary Care and AgeingLa Trobe University
| | | | - Bill Leslie
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
| | | | | | - Sophie J Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, Australian Institute for Primary Care and AgeingLa Trobe University Bundoora Victoria
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peer education and peer support in prisons. BMC Public Health 2015; 15:290. [PMID: 25880001 PMCID: PMC4404270 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1584-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Accepted: 02/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prisoners experience significantly worse health than the general population. This review examines the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peer interventions in prison settings. METHODS A mixed methods systematic review of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness studies, including qualitative and quantitative synthesis was conducted. In addition to grey literature identified and searches of websites, nineteen electronic databases were searched from 1985 to 2012. Study selection criteria were: POPULATION Prisoners resident in adult prisons and children resident in Young Offender Institutions (YOIs). INTERVENTION Peer-based interventions. COMPARATORS Review questions 3 and 4 compared peer and professionally led approaches. OUTCOMES Prisoner health or determinants of health; organisational/process outcomes; views of prison populations. STUDY DESIGNS Quantitative, qualitative and mixed method evaluations. RESULTS Fifty-seven studies were included in the effectiveness review and one study in the cost-effectiveness review; most were of poor methodological quality. Evidence suggested that peer education interventions are effective at reducing risky behaviours, and that peer support services are acceptable within the prison environment and have a positive effect on recipients, practically or emotionally. Consistent evidence from many, predominantly qualitative, studies, suggested that being a peer deliverer was associated with positive effects. There was little evidence on cost-effectiveness of peer-based interventions. CONCLUSIONS There is consistent evidence from a large number of studies that being a peer worker is associated with positive health; peer support services are also an acceptable source of help within the prison environment and can have a positive effect on recipients. Research into cost-effectiveness is sparse. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO ref: CRD42012002349.
Collapse
|
26
|
South J, Bagnall AM, Hulme C, Woodall J, Longo R, Dixey R, Kinsella K, Raine G, Vinall-Collier K, Wright J. A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peer-based interventions to maintain and improve offender health in prison settings. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2014. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr02350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundOffender health is deemed a priority issue by the Department of Health. Peer support is an established feature of prison life in England and Wales; however, more needs to be known about the effectiveness of peer-based interventions to maintain and improve health in prison settings.ObjectivesThe study aimed to synthesise the evidence on peer-based interventions in prison settings by carrying out a systematic review and holding an expert symposium. Review questions were (1) what are the effects of peer-based interventions on prisoner health and the determinants of prisoner health?, (2) what are the positive and negative impacts on health services within prison settings of delivering peer-based interventions?, (3) how do the effects of peer-based approaches compare with those of professionally led approaches? and (4) what are the costs and cost-effectiveness of peer-based interventions in prison settings?Data sourcesFor the systematic review, 20 electronic databases including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and EMBASE were searched from 1985. Grey literature and relevant websites were also searched. To supplement the review findings 58 delegates, representing a variety of organisations, attended an expert symposium, which provided contextual information.Review methodsTwo reviewers independently selected studies using the following inclusion criteria: population – prisoners resident in prisons and young offender institutions; intervention – peer-based interventions; comparators: review questions 3 and 4 compared peer-led and professionally led approaches; outcomes – prisoner health or determinants of health, organisational/process outcomes or views of prison populations; study design: quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods evaluations. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed validity using piloted electronic forms and validity assessment criteria based on published checklists. Results from quantitative studies were combined using narrative summary and meta-analysis when appropriate; results from qualitative studies were combined using thematic synthesis.ResultsA total of 15,320 potentially relevant papers were identified of which 57 studies were included in the effectiveness review and one study was included in the cost-effectiveness review; most were of poor methodological quality. A typology of peer-based interventions was developed. Evidence suggested that peer education interventions are effective at reducing risky behaviours and that peer support services provide an acceptable source of help within the prison environment and have a positive effect on recipients; the strongest evidence came from the Listener scheme. Consistent evidence from many predominantly qualitative studies suggested that being a peer deliverer was associated with positive effects across all intervention types. There was limited evidence about recruitment of peer deliverers. Recurring themes were the importance of prison managerial and staff support for schemes to operate successfully, and risk management. There was little evidence on the cost-effectiveness of peer-based interventions. An economic model, developed from the results of the effectiveness review, although based on data of variable quality and a number of assumptions, showed the cost-effectiveness of peer-led over professionally led education in prison for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.LimitationsThe 58 included studies were, on the whole, of poor methodological quality.ConclusionsThere is consistent evidence from a large number of studies that being a peer worker is associated with positive health. Peer support services can also provide an acceptable source of help within the prison environment and can have a positive effect on recipients. This was confirmed by expert evidence. Research into cost-effectiveness is sparse but a limited HIV-specific economic model, although based on a number of assumptions and evidence of variable quality, showed that peer interventions were cost-effective compared with professionally led interventions. Well-designed intervention studies are needed to provide robust evidence including assessing outcomes for the target population, economic analysis of cost-effectiveness and impacts on prison health services. More research is needed to examine issues of reach, utilisation and acceptability from the perspective of recipients and those who choose not to receive peer support.Study registrationThis study was registered as PROSPERO CRD42012002349.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane South
- Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK
| | - Anne-Marie Bagnall
- Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire Hulme
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - James Woodall
- Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK
| | - Roberta Longo
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rachael Dixey
- Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK
| | - Karina Kinsella
- Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK
| | - Gary Raine
- Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK
| | - Karen Vinall-Collier
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Judy Wright
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ryan RE, Hill SJ. Improving the experiences and health of people with multimorbidity: exploratory research with policymakers and information providers on comorbid arthritis. Aust J Prim Health 2014; 20:188-96. [PMID: 23510866 DOI: 10.1071/py12083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2012] [Accepted: 02/14/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Multimorbidity has emerged as a complex health issue with the burden falling predominantly on patients, families and the primary health care sector. Evidence-informed communication and participation, activities informed by evidence and people's views and experiences, has the potential to improve health outcomes for people with multimorbidity. In recognition of their role in shaping future actions, we conducted focus groups with policymakers and information providers. The aim of this article is to report on the range and impacts of communication problems in multimorbidity, and identify points of intervention. To facilitate and focus dialogue, comorbid arthritis was selected as the case example. Two focus groups were held: one with policymakers and the other with health information providers. Participants were asked to discuss communication problems and possibilities relevant to multimorbidity, using examples from comorbid arthritis where relevant. Participants highlighted three main areas on which to focus future efforts to improve the health outcomes and experiences of people with multimorbidity: (1) make explicit the problems of multimorbidity and communication; (2) recognise that both multimorbidity and communication issues are compounding factors; and (3) consider actions at policy, service, community and individual levels. Examining multimorbidity through the lens of communication issues identified the significant burden across different domains of the health system. The focus on communication may facilitate a cross-disease perspective to emerge and assist with policy development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca E Ryan
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, Australian Institute for Primary Care and Ageing, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Vic. 3086, Australia
| | - Sophie J Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, Australian Institute for Primary Care and Ageing, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Vic. 3086, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ryan R, Santesso N, Lowe D, Hill S, Grimshaw J, Prictor M, Kaufman C, Cowie G, Taylor M. Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2022:CD007768. [PMID: 24777444 PMCID: PMC6491214 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007768.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many systematic reviews exist on interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers, but research is distributed across diseases, populations and settings. The scope and focus of such reviews also vary widely, creating challenges for decision-makers seeking to inform decisions by using the evidence on consumers' medicines use.This is an update of a 2011 overview of systematic reviews, which synthesises the evidence, irrespective of disease, medicine type, population or setting, on the effectiveness of interventions to improve consumers' medicines use. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions which target healthcare consumers to promote safe and effective medicines use, by synthesising review-level evidence. METHODS SEARCH METHODS We included systematic reviews published on the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. We identified relevant reviews by handsearching databases from their start dates to March 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA We screened and ranked reviews based on relevance to consumers' medicines use, using criteria developed for this overview. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standardised forms to extract data, and assessed reviews for methodological quality using the AMSTAR tool. We used standardised language to summarise results within and across reviews; and gave bottom-line statements about intervention effectiveness. Two review authors screened and selected reviews, and extracted and analysed data. We used a taxonomy of interventions to categorise reviews and guide syntheses. MAIN RESULTS We included 75 systematic reviews of varied methodological quality. Reviews assessed interventions with diverse aims including support for behaviour change, risk minimisation and skills acquisition. No reviews aimed to promote systems-level consumer participation in medicines-related activities. Medicines adherence was the most frequently-reported outcome, but others such as knowledge, clinical and service-use outcomes were also reported. Adverse events were less commonly identified, while those associated with the interventions themselves, or costs, were rarely reported.Looking across reviews, for most outcomes, medicines self-monitoring and self-management programmes appear generally effective to improve medicines use, adherence, adverse events and clinical outcomes; and to reduce mortality in people self-managing antithrombotic therapy. However, some participants were unable to complete these interventions, suggesting they may not be suitable for everyone.Other promising interventions to improve adherence and other key medicines-use outcomes, which require further investigation to be more certain of their effects, include:· simplified dosing regimens: with positive effects on adherence;· interventions involving pharmacists in medicines management, such as medicines reviews (with positive effects on adherence and use, medicines problems and clinical outcomes) and pharmaceutical care services (consultation between pharmacist and patient to resolve medicines problems, develop a care plan and provide follow-up; with positive effects on adherence and knowledge).Several other strategies showed some positive effects, particularly relating to adherence, and other outcomes, but their effects were less consistent overall and so need further study. These included:· delayed antibiotic prescriptions: effective to decrease antibiotic use but with mixed effects on clinical outcomes, adverse effects and satisfaction;· practical strategies like reminders, cues and/or organisers, reminder packaging and material incentives: with positive, although somewhat mixed effects on adherence;· education delivered with self-management skills training, counselling, support, training or enhanced follow-up; information and counselling delivered together; or education/information as part of pharmacist-delivered packages of care: with positive effects on adherence, medicines use, clinical outcomes and knowledge, but with mixed effects in some studies;· financial incentives: with positive, but mixed, effects on adherence.Several strategies also showed promise in promoting immunisation uptake, but require further study to be more certain of their effects. These included organisational interventions; reminders and recall; financial incentives; home visits; free vaccination; lay health worker interventions; and facilitators working with physicians to promote immunisation uptake. Education and/or information strategies also showed some positive but even less consistent effects on immunisation uptake, and need further assessment of effectiveness and investigation of heterogeneity.There are many different potential pathways through which consumers' use of medicines could be targeted to improve outcomes, and simple interventions may be as effective as complex strategies. However, no single intervention assessed was effective to improve all medicines-use outcomes across all diseases, medicines, populations or settings.Even where interventions showed promise, the assembled evidence often only provided part of the picture: for example, simplified dosing regimens seem effective for improving adherence, but there is not yet sufficient information to identify an optimal regimen.In some instances interventions appear ineffective: for example, the evidence suggests that directly observed therapy may be generally ineffective for improving treatment completion, adherence or clinical outcomes.In other cases, interventions may have variable effects across outcomes. As an example, strategies providing information or education as single interventions appear ineffective to improve medicines adherence or clinical outcomes, but may be effective to improve knowledge; an important outcome for promoting consumers' informed medicines choices.Despite a doubling in the number of reviews included in this updated overview, uncertainty still exists about the effectiveness of many interventions, and the evidence on what works remains sparse for several populations, including children and young people, carers, and people with multimorbidity. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This overview presents evidence from 75 reviews that have synthesised trials and other studies evaluating the effects of interventions to improve consumers' medicines use.Systematically assembling the evidence across reviews allows identification of effective or promising interventions to improve consumers' medicines use, as well as those for which the evidence indicates ineffectiveness or uncertainty.Decision makers faced with implementing interventions to improve consumers' medicines use can use this overview to inform decisions about which interventions may be most promising to improve particular outcomes. The intervention taxonomy may also assist people to consider the strategies available in relation to specific purposes, for example, gaining skills or being involved in decision making. Researchers and funders can use this overview to identify where more research is needed and assess its priority. The limitations of the available literature due to the lack of evidence for important outcomes and important populations, such as people with multimorbidity, should also be considered in practice and policy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Ryan
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Public Health and Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia, 3086
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
A synthesis of the evidence for managing stress at work: a review of the reviews reporting on anxiety, depression, and absenteeism. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2012; 2012:515874. [PMID: 22496705 PMCID: PMC3306941 DOI: 10.1155/2012/515874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2011] [Revised: 08/03/2011] [Accepted: 08/05/2011] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background. Psychosocial stressors in the workplace are a cause of anxiety and depressive illnesses, suicide and family disruption. Methods. The present review synthesizes the evidence from existing systematic reviews published between 1990 and July 2011. We assessed the effectiveness of individual, organisational and mixed interventions on two outcomes: mental health and absenteeism. Results. In total, 23 systematic reviews included 499 primary studies; there were 11 meta-analyses and 12 narrative reviews. Meta-analytic studies found a greater effect size of individual interventions on individual outcomes. Organisational interventions showed mixed evidence of benefit. Organisational programmes for physical activity showed a reduction in absenteeism. The findings from the meta-analytic reviews were consistent with the findings from the narrative reviews. Specifically, cognitive-behavioural programmes produced larger effects at the individual level compared with other interventions. Some interventions appeared to lead to deterioration in mental health and absenteeism outcomes.Gaps in the literature include studies of organisational outcomes like absenteeism, the influence of specific occupations and size of organisations, and studies of the comparative effectiveness of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention. Conclusions. Individual interventions (like CBT) improve individuals' mental health. Physical activity as an organisational intervention reduces absenteeism. Research needs to target gaps in the evidence.
Collapse
|
30
|
Lewin S, Hill S, Abdullahi LH, de Castro Freire SB, Bosch-Capblanch X, Glenton C, Hussey GD, Jones CM, Kaufman J, Lin V, Mahomed H, Rhoda L, Robinson P, Waggie Z, Willis N, Wiysonge CS. 'Communicate to vaccinate' (COMMVAC). building evidence for improving communication about childhood vaccinations in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a programme of research. Implement Sci 2011; 6:125. [PMID: 22132930 PMCID: PMC3259054 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2011] [Accepted: 12/02/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective provider-parent communication can improve childhood vaccination uptake and strengthen immunisation services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Building capacity to improve communication strategies has been neglected. Rigorous research exists but is not readily found or applicable to LMICs, making it difficult for policy makers to use it to inform vaccination policies and practice.The aim of this project is to build research knowledge and capacity to use evidence-based strategies for improving communication about childhood vaccinations with parents and communities in LMICs. METHODS AND DESIGN This project is a mixed methods study with six sub-studies. In sub-study one, we will develop a systematic map of provider-parent communication interventions for childhood vaccinations by screening and extracting data from relevant literature. This map will inform sub-study two, in which we will develop a taxonomy of interventions to improve provider-parent communication around childhood vaccination. In sub-study three, the taxonomy will be populated with trial citations to create an evidence map, which will also identify how evidence is linked to communication barriers regarding vaccination. In the project's fourth sub-study, we will present the interventions map, taxonomy, and evidence map to international stakeholders to identify high-priority topics for systematic reviews of interventions to improve parent-provider communication for childhood vaccination. We will produce systematic reviews of the effects of high-priority interventions in the fifth sub-study. In the sixth and final sub-study of the project, evidence from the systematic reviews will be translated into accessible formats and messages for dissemination to LMICs. DISCUSSION This project combines evidence mapping, conceptual and taxonomy development, priority setting, systematic reviews, and knowledge transfer. It will build and share concepts, terms, evidence, and resources to aid the development of communication strategies for effective vaccination programmes in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Lewin
- Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Olavs plass N-0130 Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lowe D, Ryan R, Santesso N, Hill S. Development of a taxonomy of interventions to organise the evidence on consumers' medicines use. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2011; 85:e101-e107. [PMID: 21036505 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2010] [Revised: 08/17/2010] [Accepted: 09/25/2010] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Safe, effective (quality) medicines use remains problematic worldwide, yet consumers' medicines use research is not well organised. This creates difficulties for decision makers in identifying evidence or research gaps and in understanding how or why interventions work. Developing a conceptual framework for this evidence helps to organise the evidence for application and raise awareness of the range of possible interventions. METHODS To scope the aims of interventions to improve consumers' medicines use we searched for and iteratively analysed policy documents, systematic reviews, and an existing consumer-oriented communication intervention taxonomy. RESULTS We identified eight recurrent themes associated with the purpose of the interventions: to inform and educate; to support behaviour change; to teach skills; to facilitate communication and/or decision making; to support; to minimise risk and harms; to involve consumers at the system level; and to improve health care quality. CONCLUSION The taxonomy accommodates the complexity and diversity of interventions in this field, by focussing on the purposes of interventions, rather than the intervention type. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Currently used to organise the evidence on consumers' medicines use, the taxonomy provides a conceptual and practical map of the evidence which will aid decision making and future research investment in the area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianne Lowe
- Cochrane Consumers & Communication Review Group, Australian Institute for Primary Care and Ageing, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ryan R, Santesso N, Hill S, Lowe D, Kaufman C, Grimshaw J. Consumer-oriented interventions for evidence-based prescribing and medicines use: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011:CD007768. [PMID: 21563160 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007768.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous systematic reviews exist on interventions to improve consumers' medicines use, but this research is distributed across diseases, populations and settings. The scope and focus of reviews on consumers' medicines use also varies widely. Such differences create challenges for decision makers seeking review-level evidence to inform decisions about medicines use. OBJECTIVES To synthesise the evidence from systematic reviews on the effects of interventions which target healthcare consumers to promote evidence-based prescribing for, and medicines use, by consumers. We sought evidence on the effects on health and other outcomes for healthcare consumers, professionals and services. METHODS We included systematic reviews published on the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. We identified relevant reviews by handsearching both databases from start date to Issue 3 2008. We screened and ranked reviews based on relevance to consumers' medicines use, using criteria developed for this overview. Standardised forms were used to extract data, and reviews were assessed for methodological quality using the AMSTAR instrument. We used standardised language to summarise results within and across reviews; and a further synthesis step was used to give bottom-line statements about intervention effectiveness. Two review authors selected reviews, extracted and analysed data. We used a taxonomy of interventions to categorise reviews. MAIN RESULTS We included 37 reviews (18 Cochrane, 19 non-Cochrane), of varied methodological quality.Reviews assessed interventions with diverse aims including support for behaviour change, risk minimisation, skills acquisition and information provision. No reviews aimed to promote systems-level consumer participation in medicines-related activities. Medicines adherence was the most commonly reported outcome, but others such as clinical (health and wellbeing), service use and knowledge outcomes were also reported. Reviews rarely reported adverse events or harms, and the evidence was sparse for several populations, including children and young people, carers, and people with multimorbidity.Promising interventions to improve adherence and other key medicines use outcomes (eg adverse events, knowledge) included self-monitoring and self-management, simplified dosing and interventions directly involving pharmacists. Other strategies showed promise in relation to adherence but their effects were less consistent. These included reminders; education combined with self-management skills training, counselling or support; financial incentives; and lay health worker interventions.No interventions were effective to improve all medicines use outcomes across all diseases, populations or settings. For some interventions, such as information or education provided alone, the evidence suggests ineffectiveness; for many others there is insufficient evidence to determine effects on medicines use outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Systematically assembling the evidence across reviews allows identification of effective or promising interventions to improve consumers' medicines use, as well as those for which the evidence indicates ineffectiveness or uncertainty.Decision makers faced with implementing interventions to improve consumers' medicines use can use this overview to inform these decisions and also to consider the range of interventions available; while researchers and funders can use this overview to determine where research is needed. However, the limitations of the literature relating to the lack of evidence for important outcomes and specific populations, such as people with multimorbidity, should also be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Ryan
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, Australian Institute for Primary Care & Ageing, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia, 3086
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nowak P. Synthesis of qualitative linguistic research--a pilot review integrating and generalizing findings on doctor-patient interaction. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2011; 82:429-441. [PMID: 21295936 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2010] [Revised: 01/21/2011] [Accepted: 01/21/2011] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is a broad range qualitative linguistic research (sequential analysis) on doctor-patient interaction that had only a marginal impact on clinical research and practice. At least in parts this is due to the lack of qualitative research synthesis in the field. Available research summaries are not systematic in their methodology. This paper proposes a synthesis methodology for qualitative, sequential analytic research on doctor-patient interaction. METHODS The presented methodology is not new but specifies standard methodology of qualitative research synthesis for sequential analytic research. RESULTS This pilot review synthesizes twelve studies on German-speaking doctor-patient interactions, identifies 45 verbal actions of doctors and structures them in a systematics of eight interaction components. Three interaction components ("Listening", "Asking for information", and "Giving information") seem to be central and cover two thirds of the identified action types. CONCLUSIONS This pilot review demonstrates that sequential analytic research can be synthesized in a consistent and meaningful way, thus providing a more comprehensive and unbiased integration of research. Future synthesis of qualitative research in the area of health communication research is very much needed. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Qualitative research synthesis can support the development of quantitative research and of educational materials in medical training and patient training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Nowak
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Health Promotion Research, Rooseveltplatz 2, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|