Prevalence and Risk Factors of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italian Infants and Young Children

OBJECTIVES

Reports of prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) in infants/toddlers are widely variable. Reasons for this variability are not yet fully understood. The objective of this study is to estimate the prevalence of FGIDs according to Rome IV criteria and to evaluate associated factors, in Italian infants and toddlers.

METHODS

Subjects aged 0-48 months were enrolled by general pediatricians from 3 Italian regions. Parents or legal guardians were administered questionnaires including information about the child, the family, and GI symptoms according to Rome IV criteria.

RESULTS

Five hundred eight infants aged 0-12 months [mean age 4.4 ± 3.4 months; females (F) 40.9%], and 268 children aged 13-48 months (mean age 30.8 ± 10.7 months; F 44.4%) were included. In infants, prevalence of FGIDs was 21.1%, and the most prevalent FGID was infant colic (9.3%). In toddlers, prevalence of FGIDs was 19.6%, with functional constipation being the most frequent disorder (16.1%). In infants, multivariable analysis found that being older, being the only child, and living in a rural environment were associated with a lower rate of FGIDs. Prevalence was, in contrast, higher in infants fed with formula.

CONCLUSIONS

One out of 5 Italian infants and young children is affected by at least 1 FGID. The most frequent FGID in infants is infant colic, while in toddlers this is functional constipation. In infants, prevalence of FGIDs is lower if the subject has no siblings, and in children living in a rural environment, while formula feeding represents a risk factor for FGIDs occurrence.

Effectiveness of interventions aiming to reduce inappropriate drug prescribing: an overview of interventions

Objective

Inappropriate prescribing of drugs is associated with unnecessary harms for patients and healthcare costs. Interventions to reduce these prescriptions are widely studied, yet the effectiveness of different types of interventions remains unclear. Therefore, we provide an overview regarding the effectiveness of intervention types that aim to reduce inappropriate drug prescriptions, unrestricted by target drugs, population or setting.

Methods

For this overview, systematic reviews (SRs) were used as the source for original studies. EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched from inception to August 2018. All SRs aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce inappropriate prescribing of drugs were eligible for inclusion. The SRs and their original studies were screened for eligibility. Interventions of the original studies were categorized by type of intervention. The percentage of interventions showing a significant reduction of inappropriate prescribing were reported per intervention category.

Key findings

Thirty-two SRs were included, which provided 319 unique interventions. Overall, 61.4% of these interventions showed a significant reduction in inappropriate prescribing of drugs. Strategies that were most frequently effective in reducing inappropriate prescribing were multifaceted interventions (73.2%), followed by interventions containing additional diagnostic tests (antibiotics) (70.4%), computer interventions (69.2%), audit and feedback (66.7%), patient-mediated interventions (62.5%) and multidisciplinary (team) approach (57.1%). The least frequently effective intervention was an education for healthcare professionals (50.0%).

Conclusion

The majority of the interventions were effective in reducing inappropriate prescribing of drugs. Multifaceted interventions most frequently showed a significant reduction of inappropriate prescribing. Education for healthcare professionals is the most frequently included intervention in this overview, yet this category is least frequently effective.

Prevalence of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in European Infants and Toddlers

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) in young children in a cross-sectional, multicenter study in Belgium, Italy, and The Netherlands.

STUDY DESIGN

Children were enrolled if they were age 0-48 months, attending a general pediatrician (Belgium, Italy) or a well-baby clinic (The Netherlands) for routine follow-up. Separate questionnaires were developed for infants age 0-12 months and for toddlers age 13-48 months. Questionnaires evaluated the clinical history, symptoms, sociodemographic information on the family, and exposure to stressful life events. FGIDs were defined according to Rome IV criteria.

RESULTS

In total 2751 children were included: 1698 infants age 0-12 months and 1053 children age 13-48 months. The prevalence of any FGID in infants age 0-12 months and 13-48 months was 24.7% and 11.3%, respectively. The most common disorders were infant regurgitation (13.8%) in infants and functional constipation (9.6%) in toddlers. Multivariable regression analyses demonstrated that younger age (P = .030) and formula feeding (P = .045) were associated with the prevalence of any FGID among infants. Country (Italy) (P = .033) and parents subjected to domestic violence (P = .035) were associated with the prevalence of any FGID in toddlers age 13-48 months.

CONCLUSIONS

FGIDs are common in a community sample of Western European infants and toddlers. Regurgitation is most prevalent in infants and functional constipation is most common in toddlers. Younger age, formula feeding, and domestic violence to parents are associated with the prevalence of FGIDs.

Variations in Definitions and Outcome Measures in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is defined as GER disease (GERD) when it leads to troublesome symptoms and/or complications. We hypothesized that definitions and outcome measures in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pediatric GERD would be heterogeneous.

OBJECTIVES

Systematically assess definitions and outcome measures in RCTs in this population.

DATA SOURCES

Data were obtained through Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and Pubmed databases.

STUDY SELECTION

We selected English-written therapeutic RCTs concerning GERD in children 0 to 18 years old.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were tabulated and presented descriptively. Each individual parameter or set of parameters with unique criteria for interpretation was considered a single definition for GER(D). Quality was assessed by using the Delphi score.

RESULTS

A total of 2410 unique articles were found; 46 articles were included. Twenty-six (57%) studies defined GER by using 25 different definitions and investigated 25 different interventions. GERD was defined in 21 (46%) studies, all using a unique definition and investigating a total of 23 interventions. Respectively 87 and 61 different primary outcome measures were reported by the studies in GER and GERD. Eight (17%) studies did not report on side effects. Of the remaining 38 (83%) studies that did report on side effects, 18 (47%) included this as predefined outcome measure of which 4 (22%) as a primary outcome measure. Sixteen studies (35%) were of good methodological quality.

LIMITATIONS

Only English-written studies were included.

CONCLUSIONS

Inconsistency and heterogeneity exist in definitions and outcome measures used in RCTs on pediatric GER and GERD; therefore, we recommend the development of a core outcome set.

Developing a core outcome set for infant colic for primary, secondary and tertiary care settings: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Infant colic (IC) is defined as recurrent and prolonged crying without an obvious cause or evidence of failure to thrive or illness. It is a common problem with a prevalence of 5%-25%. The unknown aetiology results in a wide variety in interventions and use of heterogeneous outcome measures across therapeutic trials. Our aim was to develop a core outcome set (COS) for IC to facilitate and improve evidence synthesis.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective study design; primary, secondary and tertiary care.

METHODS

The COS was developed using a modified Delphi technique. First, healthcare professionals (HCPs) and parents of infants with IC were asked to list up to five outcomes they considered relevant in the treatment of IC. Outcomes mentioned by >10% of participants were forwarded to a shortlist. In the second round, outcomes on this shortlist were rated and prioritised. The final COS was defined in a face-to-face expert meeting of paediatricians.

RESULTS

F of invited stakeholders (133 HCPs and 55 parents of infants with IC) completed both Delphi rounds. Duration of crying, family stress, sleeping time of infant, quality of life (of family), discomfort of infant and hospital admission/duration were rated as most important outcomes in IC, framing the final COS.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of this COS should serve as a minimum of outcomes to be measured and reported. This will benefit evidence synthesis, by enhancing homogeneity of outcomes, and enable evaluation of success in therapeutic trials on IC. Researchers are strongly encouraged to use this COS when setting up a clinical trial in primary, secondary and/or tertiary care or performing a systematic review on IC.