General practitioner's clinical practices, difficulties and educational needs to manage Alzheimer's disease in France: analysis of national telephone-inquiry data

Truth, hope and the disclosure of a dementia diagnosis: A scoping review of the ethical considerations from the perspective of the person, carer and clinician

This paper explores contemporary approaches to balancing truth with the provision of hope during the disclosure of a dementia diagnosis. We discuss the ethical significance of these practices as they relate to each member of the triad - the person, the carer and the clinician - at the point of diagnosis and beyond. The process of disclosing a diagnosis of dementia is complex. It encompasses breaking bad news while balancing hope, with truth about a progressive life-limiting condition. The process of receiving the diagnosis likewise challenges the person who may be unprepared for the diagnosis, while carers seek information and supports. The impact of receiving a diagnosis of dementia can be life-changing and harmful at the personal level - for both the person and carer. This risk of harm becomes a critical consideration for clinicians when deciding on the level of truth: what information should be relayed and to whom? That risk is also balanced against the ethical issue of patient autonomy, which includes the right to know (or not) and make informed decisions about therapeutic interventions. While the consensus is that the autonomy of the person living with dementia must be upheld, controversy exists regarding the extent to which this should occur. For instance, at diagnosis, it is common for clinicians to use euphemisms rather than the word dementia to maintain hope, even though people and carers prefer to know the diagnosis. This practice of therapeutic lying is a pervasive ethical issue in dementia care, made more acceptable by its roots in diagnosis disclosure.

Primary Care Physicians' Perceived Barriers to Optimal Dementia Care: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Primary care physicians (PCPs) have a key role in providing care for people with dementia and their carers, however, a range of barriers prevent them from delivering optimal care. We reviewed studies on PCPs' perceptions of barriers to providing optimal dementia care, including their methodological quality, whether they focused on barriers related to diagnosis and/or management, and the patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers identified.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Studies were included if they were quantitative studies published since 2006 which reported on PCPs' perceptions of the barriers to providing dementia care. The methodological quality of identified studies was assessed using an adapted version of accepted rating criteria for quantitative studies. Data were extracted from studies which were rated as "moderate" or "strong" quality.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were identified, 16 of which were rated as "moderate" or "strong" methodological quality. Patient-related barriers included a reluctance to acknowledge cognitive decline and patient nonadherence to management plans. Provider-related barriers included a lack of training and confidence. System-related barriers included a lack of time during consultations and lack of support services.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

This review highlights a range of barriers to dementia diagnosis and management from studies rated as being methodologically adequate. Future studies should also utilize theory-driven approaches to exploring a comprehensive range of barriers to optimal dementia care across the care trajectory.

Comparing perspectives of family caregivers and healthcare professionals regarding caregiver burden in dementia care: results of a mixed methods study in a rural setting

Background

Persons with dementia (PwD) need support to remain in their own homes as long as possible. Family caregivers, homecare nurses and general practitioners (GPs) play an important role in providing this support, particularly in rural settings. Assessing caregiver burden is important to prevent adverse health effects among this population. This study analysed perceived burden and needs of family caregivers of PwD in rural areas from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and family caregivers.

Methods

This was a sequential explanatory mixed methods study that used both questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Questionnaires measuring caregiver burden, quality of life and nursing needs were distributed to the caregivers; health professionals received questionnaires with adjusted items for each group. Additionally, in-depth qualitative interviews were carried out with eight family caregivers.

Results

The cross-sectional survey population included GPs (n = 50), homecare nurses (n = 140) and family caregivers (n = 113). Healthcare professionals similarly assessed the psychosocial burden and stress caused by behavioural disturbances as most relevant. Psychological stress, social burden and disruptive behaviour (in that order) were regarded as the most important factors from the caregivers’ perspective. It was found that 31% of caregivers reported permanent or frequent caregiver overload. Eight themes related to caregiver burden emerged from the subsequent interviews with caregivers.

Conclusions

Professional support at home on an hourly basis was found to be highly relevant to prevent social isolation and compensate for lack of leisure among caregivers of PwD. Improvement of interprofessional dementia-related education is needed to ensure high-quality primary care.

Effect of a dementia education intervention on the confidence and attitudes of general practitioners in Australia: a pretest post-test study

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the impact of a Dementia Education Workshop on the confidence and attitudes of general practitioner (GP) registrars (GPR) and GP supervisors (GPS) in relation to the early diagnosis and management of dementia.

DESIGN

Pretest post-test research design.

SETTING

Continuing medical education in Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

332 GPR and 114 GPS.

INTERVENTIONS

Registrars participated in a 3-hour face-to-face workshop while supervisors participated in a 2-hour-modified version designed to assist with the education and supervision of registrars.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The General Practitioners Confidence and Attitude Scale for Dementia was used to assess overall confidence, attitude to care and engagement. A t-test for paired samples was used to identify differences from preworkshop (T1) to postworkshop (T2) for each GP group. A t-test for independent samples was undertaken to ascertain differences between each workshop group. A Cohen's d was calculated to measure the effect size of any difference between T1 and T2 scores.

RESULTS

Significant increases in scores were recorded for Confidence in Clinical Abilities, Attitude to Care and Engagement between pretest and post-test periods. GPR exhibited the greatest increase in scores for Confidence in Clinical Abilities and Engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted educational interventions can improve attitude, increase confidence and reduce negative attitudes towards engagement of participating GPs.

Dementia in Hungary: General practitioners' routines and perspectives regarding early recognition

Background: Undetected dementia in primary care is a global problem. Since general practitioners (GPs) act as the first step in the identification process, examining their routines could help us to enhance the currently low recognition rates.

Objectives: The study aimed to explore, for the first time in Hungary, the dementia identification practices and views of GPs.

Methods: In the context of an extensive, national survey (February-November 2014) 8% of all practicing GPs in Hungary (n = 402) filled in a self-administered questionnaire. The questions (single, multiple-choice, Likert-type) analysed in the present study explored GPs’ methods and views regarding dementia identification and their ideas about the optimal circumstances of case-finding.

Results: The vast majority of responding GPs (97%) agreed that the early recognition of dementia would enhance both the patients’ and their relatives’ well-being. When examining the possibility of dementia, most GPs (91%) relied on asking the patients general questions and only a quarter of them (24%) used formal tests, even though they were mostly satisfied with both the Clock Drawing Test (69%) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (65%). Longer consultation time was chosen as the most important facet of improvement needed for better identification of dementia in primary care (81%). Half of the GPs (49%) estimated dementia recognition rate to be lower than 30% in their practice.

Conclusions: Hungarian GPs were aware of the benefits of early recognition, but the shortage of consultation time in primary care was found to be a major constraint on efficient case-finding.

The knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners to the assessment and management of pain in people with dementia

BACKGROUND

Pain in people with dementia is underdiagnosed and undertreated. General practitioners (GPs) play a pivotal role in dementia care but their perspectives on pain in people with dementia remains under-researched. The aim of this study was to explore GPs' knowledge and attitudes towards pain assessment and management in people with dementia.

METHODS

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. A questionnaire was adapted from a previous study and piloted with 5 GPs. The questionnaire was posted to a census sample of all GPs in Cork city and county in the southern region of Ireland. The questionnaire collected demographic information, responses to a series of Likert-type statements assessing GPs' knowledge and attitudes, and provided an opportunity for the GP to give qualitative feedback on their experiences of managing pain in dementia. SPSS v25 was used for statistical analysis. Qualitative responses were thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Of the 320 questionnaires posted, 157 completed questionnaires were returned (response rate of 49%). The sample was representative of GPs nationally in terms of years in GP practice and practice location. Over two-thirds (108/157) of respondents had a nursing home commitment. Only 10% of respondents (16/157) were aware of any dementia-specific pain assessment tools. The larger the nursing home commitment of the GP the more likely they were to be familiar with these tools (p = 0.048). The majority of respondents (113/157) believed people with dementia could not self-report pain. Respondents were uncertain about the safety of using opioid medications to treat pain in people with dementia with only 51.6% agreeing that they were safe. The qualitative comments highlighted the importance the GPs placed on surrogate reports of pain, GPs' uncertainty regarding the value of formal pain assessment tools and the challenges caused by under-resourcing in general practice.

CONCLUSION

This study has highlighted aspects of pain assessment and management in dementia that GPs find challenging. Guidance on pain assessment and management in people with dementia do not appear to be translating into clinical practice. The findings will inform educational interventions being developed by our research team as part of the implementation of the Irish national dementia strategy. The knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners to the assessment and management of pain in people with dementia.

Description of general practitioners' practices when suspecting cognitive impairment. Recourse to care in dementia (Recaredem) study

OBJECTIVE

General practitioners (GPs) play a major role in the assessment of dementia but it is still unrecognized in primary care and its management is heterogeneous. Our objective is to describe the usual practices, and their determinants, of French GPs in this field.

METHODS

GPs' characteristics and practices when facing cognitive decline were collected through a telephone interview and a postal questionnaire. A descriptive analysis of all study variables was conducted. The study of quantitative explanatory variables was done by testing the equality of means and the choice of qualitative variables was based on the chi-square independence test or Fischer test.

RESULTS

Hundred two GPs completed the study. GPs were in majority men, working in urban areas. Mean age was 54.4 years old. GPs' feeling of confidence and self-perception of follow-up of national recommendations is linked with their practices. Performing a clinical interview to assess cognitive impairment is linked with good communication skills. GPs feel less confident to give information about resources for dementia. The main reason alleged for underdiagnosis is the limited effectiveness of drug therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underlines the importance of GPs' feeling of confidence when managing cognitively impaired patients with dementia, and the need of increasing training in the field of dementia, which could improve the awareness of GPs about diagnosis and available resources.

General practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: A mixed-methods systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To synthesise the existing published literature on general practitioners (GP)'s knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) with a view to informing future interventions.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and synthesis of quantitative and qualitative studies that explored GPs' experiences of managing BPSD (PROSPERO protocol registration CRD42017054916). Seven electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2017. Each stage of the review process involved at least 2 authors working independently. The meta-ethnographic approach was used to synthesise the findings of the included studies while preserving the context of the primary data. The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) was used to assess the confidence in our individual review findings.

RESULTS

Of the 1638 articles identified, 76 full texts were reviewed and 11 were included. Three main concepts specific to GPs' experiences of managing BPSD emerged: unmet primary care resource needs, justification of antipsychotic prescribing, and the pivotal role of families. A "line of argument" was drawn, which described how in the context of resource limitations a therapeutic void was created. This resulted in GPs being over reliant on antipsychotics and family caregivers. These factors appeared to culminate in a reactive response to BPSD whereby behaviours and symptoms could escalate until a crisis point was reached.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review offers new insights into GPs' perspectives on the management of BPSD and will help to inform the design and development of interventions to support GPs managing BPSD.

Communicating a diagnosis of dementia: A systematic mixed studies review of attitudes and practices of health practitioners

The aim of this study is to systematically review practitioners’ practices and attitudes in regards to communicating a diagnosis of dementia. A systematic search was conducted of Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed for English language original empirical papers. A sequential explanatory mixed studies analysis approach was used. Twenty-five quantitative descriptive, two intervention, six mixed methods descriptive and 21 qualitative studies were included. Pooled analysis showed that 34% of GPs and 48% of specialists usually/routinely tell the person with dementia their diagnosis, and 89% of GPs and 97% specialists usually/routinely tell the family the diagnosis. Euphemistic terms such as ‘memory problems’ are more often used to describe dementia than medical terms. Practitioners’ decision to diagnose and communicate the diagnosis of dementia are influenced by (a) their own beliefs regarding dementia and treatment efficacy and their confidence in diagnosis and communication; (b) patient circumstances including level of awareness, level of severity and family support; (c) the health and social care system including access to specialist and diagnostic services, reimbursement for diagnosis/management and availability of services and (d) cultural norms in relation to dementia including stigma, labels, and common clinical practice. The diagnosis and communication of diagnosis of dementia are intertwined processes and should be concurrently addressed in interventions. Multicomponent approaches to address these practices could include guideline development, practitioner education, anti-stigma public health campaigns, offering post-diagnosis treatments and support and sufficient reimbursement for practitioners for time spent managing dementia.

Diabetes Care and Dementia Among Older Adults: A Nationwide 3-Year Longitudinal Study

OBJECTIVES

To compare diabetes monitoring and the incidence of acute diabetic complications between patients with and without incident Alzheimer's Disease and Related Syndromes (ADRS).

DESIGN

Longitudinal observational study from 2010 to 2014.

SETTING

Data from the French national health system database.

PARTICIPANTS

The France-Démence cohort: individuals aged 65 years or older suffering from incident ADRS, based on long-term disease registry, hospitalization for dementia, or antidementia drug delivery. They were matched (1:1) to a pair free of ADRS on age, sex, residence area, and insurance scheme. This study included France-Démence population with known diabetes for at least 2 years.

MEASUREMENTS

Data related to diabetes control and complications: biological monitoring such as glycated hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c, ≥1/y, ≥2/y), lipid profile, microalbuminuria; eye examination; hospitalization for diabetes-related complications such as coma with ketoacidosis; and hospitalization for hypoglycemia were studied between the year prior to ADRS identification (Y_-1) and the 2 following years (Y₀; Y₁). Incidences between the 2 groups (ADRS/non-ADRS) were compared using age-standardized incidence ratios (SIR).

RESULTS

The studied population included 87,816 individuals. HbA1c determination was less frequent in ADRS group, no matter the study period and the minimal annual threshold used. Respectively, 82.6% and 88.5% of ADRS and non-ADRS group had at least 1 HbA_1c testing during Y_-1 [SIR = 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-0.95], 73.4% and 89.0% during Y₀ (SIR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.82-0.84), and 75.4% and 89.3% during Y₁ (SIR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.83‒0.86). Subjects with ADRS were also consistently more hospitalized than non-ADRS peers. The gap was maximal in the year following the diagnosis, as observed for hospitalizations for any cause related to diabetes (SIR Y_-1: 2.04, Y₀: 3.14, Y₁: 1.67), diabetes mellitus with coma (SIR Y_-1: 3.84, Y₀: 9.30, Y₁: 3.06), and hypoglycemia (SIR Y_-1: 4.20, Y₀: 5.25, Y₁: 2.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Incident ADRS is associated with a less frequent diabetes monitoring and an increased risk of diabetes complications compared with older people without ADRS. Our study questions healthcare quality offered to participants with ADRS in comorbidity control. Further investigations are required to explain the mechanisms underlying our results and to propose actions to improve care of patients with ADRS.

"We're certainly not in our comfort zone": a qualitative study of GPs' dementia-care educational needs

Background

Rising dementia prevalence rates rise combined with the policy objective of enabling people with dementia to remain living at home, means that there will be a growing demand for dementia care in the community setting. However, GPs are challenged by dementia care and have identified it as an area in which further training is needed. Previous studies of GPs dementia care educational needs have explored the views of GPs alone, without taking the perspectives of people with dementia and family carers into account. The aim of the study was to explore GPs’ dementia care educational needs, as viewed from multiple perspectives, in order to inform the design and delivery of an educational programme for GPs.

Methods

A qualitative study of GPs, people with dementia and family carers in a community setting was undertaken. Face-to-face interviews were performed with GPs, people with dementia and with family carers. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.

Results

Thirty-one people were interviewed, consisting of fourteen GPs, twelve family carers and five people with dementia. GPs expressed a wish for further education, preferentially through small group workshops. Five distinct educational needs emerged from the interviews, namely, diagnosis, disclosure, signposting of local services, counselling and the management of behavioural and psychological symptoms (BPSD). While GPs focused on diagnosis, disclosure and BPSD in particular, people with dementia and family carers emphasised the need for GPs to engage in counselling and signposting of local services.

Conclusions

The triangulation of data from multiple relevant sources revealed a broader range of GPs’ educational needs, incorporating both medical and social aspects of dementia care. The findings of this study will inform the content and delivery of a dementia educational programme for GPs that is practice-relevant, by ensuring that the curriculum meets the needs of GPs, patients and their families.