1
|
Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening According to Health Professional Counseling and Age in the United States. Prostate Cancer 2022; 2022:8646314. [PMID: 35036010 PMCID: PMC8758274 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8646314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In 2018, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended that PSA screening for prostate cancer involve men aged 55–69, based on a personal decision following consultation with a health professional. PSA screening in men aged 70 or older should only occur if symptoms exist. This study identifies the association between having a PSA test in the past two years and whether or not there was consultation with a health professional about the benefits and/or harms of PSA screening. Methods Analyses were based on data involving men aged 40 years or older, who responded to PSA related questions in the 2018 BRFSS survey. Results Approximately 32.0% (14.6% for ages 40–54, 41.7% for ages 55–69, and 49.8% for ages 70 years and older) of respondents had a PSA test in the past two years. Approximately 81.7% of these men had talked with a health professional about the benefits and/or harms of PSA screening, with 42.4% having discussed the benefits and harms, 54.6% having discussed the benefits only, and 3.0% having discussed the harms only. The odds of a PSA test in the past two years in men having talked with a health professional about the benefits and harms of the test versus no talk are 10.1 (95% CI 9.3–10.8), in men who talked with a health professional about the benefits only versus no talk are 10.8 (95% CI 10.0–11.6), and in men who talked with a health professional about the harms only versus no talk are 3.9 (95% CI 2.9–5.1). Conclusion PSA screening is most common in men aged 70 or older, which is counter to the US Preventive Task Force recommendation. Most men having a PSA test have talked with a health professional about the test, but the talks tended to focus on just the benefits of screening and not both potential benefits and harms.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bernal-Soriano MC, Parker LA, López-Garrigós M, Hernández-Aguado I, Gómez-Pérez L, Caballero-Romeu JP, Pastor-Valero M, García N, Alfayate-Guerra R, Lumbreras B. Do the Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Tests That Are Ordered in Clinical Practice Adhere to the Pertinent Guidelines? J Clin Med 2021; 10:2650. [PMID: 34208627 PMCID: PMC8234229 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10122650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Scientific societies have provided guidelines to reduce PSA-specific harms. We studied the potential non-compliance of PSA testing with current guidelines in general practice. A cross-sectional study of a random sample of 1291 patients with a PSA test was performed between January and April 2018 in primary health care. Patients with a previous prostate cancer diagnosis or those who were being followed-up for previous high PSA values were excluded. Two independent researchers classified whether each test was potentially non-compliant with recommendations. We estimated frequencies of potentially non-compliant PSA determinations and calculated prevalence ratios (PR) to assess their relationship with possible explanatory variables. A total of 66% (95% CI: 62-69%) of PSA requests in asymptomatic patients were potentially non-compliant with the current guideline. This was associated with having a previous diagnosis of neoplasm (PR adjusted by age and life expectancy: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.02-1.37) as well as being a current consumer of tobacco, alcohol, or other drugs (PR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67-0.97). Real world data shows that patients are still frequently exposed to overdiagnosis risk with a PSA potentially non-compliant with recommendations. Patients diagnosed with another neoplasm or non-consumers of toxic substances were more exposed, probably due to increased contact with doctors or health-seeking behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Carmen Bernal-Soriano
- Department of Public Health, University Miguel Hernández de Elche, 03550 Alicante, Spain; (L.A.P.); (I.H.-A.); (M.P.-V.); (B.L.)
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Lucy Anne Parker
- Department of Public Health, University Miguel Hernández de Elche, 03550 Alicante, Spain; (L.A.P.); (I.H.-A.); (M.P.-V.); (B.L.)
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Maite López-Garrigós
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain;
- Clinical Laboratory Department, University Hospital of San Juan de Alicante, Sant Joan d’Alacant, 03550 Alicante, Spain
| | - Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado
- Department of Public Health, University Miguel Hernández de Elche, 03550 Alicante, Spain; (L.A.P.); (I.H.-A.); (M.P.-V.); (B.L.)
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Luis Gómez-Pérez
- Urology Department, University Hospital of San Juan de Alicante, 03550 Alicante, Spain;
- Pathology and Surgery Department, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, 03550 Alicante, Spain
| | - Juan-Pablo Caballero-Romeu
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Alicante, 03010 Alicante, Spain; (J.-P.C.-R.); (N.G.)
- Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03010 Alicante, Spain
| | - María Pastor-Valero
- Department of Public Health, University Miguel Hernández de Elche, 03550 Alicante, Spain; (L.A.P.); (I.H.-A.); (M.P.-V.); (B.L.)
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Nuria García
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Alicante, 03010 Alicante, Spain; (J.-P.C.-R.); (N.G.)
| | - Rocío Alfayate-Guerra
- Clinical Laboratory Department, University General Hospital of Alicante, 03010 Alicante, Spain;
| | - Blanca Lumbreras
- Department of Public Health, University Miguel Hernández de Elche, 03550 Alicante, Spain; (L.A.P.); (I.H.-A.); (M.P.-V.); (B.L.)
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nair-Shalliker V, Bang A, Weber M, Goldsbury DE, Caruana M, Emery J, Banks E, Canfell K, O'Connell DL, Smith DP. Factors associated with prostate specific antigen testing in Australians: Analysis of the New South Wales 45 and Up Study. Sci Rep 2018. [PMID: 29523809 PMCID: PMC5844910 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22589-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Australia has one of the highest incidence rates of prostate cancer (PC) worldwide, due in part to widespread prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing. We aimed to identify factors associated with PSA testing in Australian men without a diagnosis of prostate cancer or prior prostate disease. Participants were men joining the 45 and Up Study in 2006–2009, aged ≥45 years at recruitment. Self-completed questionnaires were linked to cancer registrations, hospitalisations, health services data and deaths. Men with a history of PC, radical prostatectomy or a “monitoring” PSA test for prostate disease were excluded. We identified Medicare reimbursed PSA tests during 2012–2014. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) for the association between having PSA tests and factors of interest. Of the 62,765 eligible men, 51.8% had at least one screening PSA test during 2012–2014. Factors strongly associated with having a PSA test included having 27+ general practitioner consultations (versus 3–9 consultations; OR = 2.00; 95%CI = 1.90–2.11), benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment (versus none; OR = 1.59(95%CI = 1.49–1.70), aged 60–69 years (versus 50–59 years; OR = 1.54; 95%CI = 1.48–1.60). These results emphasise the important role of primary care in decision making about PSA testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Visalini Nair-Shalliker
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Albert Bang
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marianne Weber
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David E Goldsbury
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Caruana
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne. Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emily Banks
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Karen Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dianne L O'Connell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - David P Smith
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Menzies Health Institute, Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pre-diagnostic statin use, lymph node status and mortality in women with stages I-III breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2017; 117:588-596. [PMID: 28720842 PMCID: PMC5558692 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Revised: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Recent meta-analyses suggest that pre-diagnostic statin use is associated with reduced breast cancer-specific mortality. Studies have shown that high breast tumour expression of the statin target (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase) is associated with lymph-node negative cancer. Therefore, we examined the association between pre-diagnostic statin use and; lymph node status, breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. Methods: Women with stages I–III breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Registry of Ireland (N=6314). Pre-diagnostic statin users were identified from linked prescription claims data (N=2082). Relative risks were estimated for associations between pre-diagnostic statin use and lymph node status. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for associations between pre-diagnostic statin use and breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. Results: Pre-diagnostic statin use was not associated with lymph node negative status at diagnosis. In multivariate analyses, pre-diagnostic statin use was associated with reduced all-cause (HR 0.78 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69, 0.89) and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.81 95% CI 0.68, 0.96). This reduction in cancer-specific mortality was greatest in statin-users with oestrogen (ER) receptor-positive tumours (HR 0.69 95% CI 0.55, 0.85). Conclusion: Patients with pre-diagnostic statin exposure had a significant reduction in breast cancer-specific mortality, which was even more pronounced in women with ER+ tumours.
Collapse
|
5
|
Drummond FJ, O'Leary E, Gavin A, Kinnear H, Sharp L. Mode of prostate cancer detection is associated with the psychological wellbeing of survivors: results from the PiCTure study. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24:2297-2307. [PMID: 26594035 PMCID: PMC4805717 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-3033-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2015] [Accepted: 11/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many men with prostate cancer are asymptomatic, diagnosed following prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing. We investigate whether mode of detection, i.e. 'PSA detected' or 'clinically detected', was associated with psychological wellbeing among prostate cancer survivors. METHODS A cross-sectional postal questionnaire was administered in 2012 to 6559 prostate cancer (ICD10 C61) survivors up to 18 years post-diagnosis, identified through population-based cancer registries in Ireland. Psychological wellbeing was assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21. Logistic regression was used to investigate associations between mode of detection and depression, anxiety and stress, adjusting for socio-demographic and clinical confounders. RESULTS The response rate was 54 % (3348/6262). Fifty-nine percent of survivors were diagnosed with asymptomatic PSA-tested disease. Prevalence of depression (13.8 vs 20.7 %; p < 0.001), anxiety (13.6 vs 20.9 %; p < 0.001) and stress (8.7 vs 13.8 %; p < 0.001) were significantly lower among survivors diagnosed with PSA-detected, than clinically detected disease. After adjusting for clinical and socio-demographic factors, survivors with clinically detected disease had significantly higher risk of depression (odds ratio (OR) = 1.46 95 % CI 1.18, 1.80; p = 0.001), anxiety (OR = 1.36 95 % CI 1.09, 1.68; p = 0.006) and stress (OR = 1.43 95 % CI 1.11, 1.85; p = 0.006) than survivors with PSA-detected disease. CONCLUSIONS These findings contribute to the ongoing debate on benefits and risks of PSA testing and may be considered by policy makers formulating population-based prostate cancer screening policies. The relatively high prevalence of negative psychological states among survivors means that a 'risk-adapted approach' should be implemented to screen survivors most at risk of psychological morbidity for psychological health, and mode of detection could be considered as a risk stratum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances J Drummond
- National Cancer Registry Ireland, Building 6800, Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Cork, Ireland.
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
| | - Eamonn O'Leary
- National Cancer Registry Ireland, Building 6800, Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Cork, Ireland
| | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, Ireland
| | - Heather Kinnear
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, Ireland
| | - Linda Sharp
- National Cancer Registry Ireland, Building 6800, Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Cork, Ireland
- University of Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
| |
Collapse
|