Compliance to fingolimod and other disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis patients, a retrospective cohort study

Adherence, Persistence, Switching and Costs of Injectable and Oral Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis. Real Life Analysis Over 6 Years of Treatment

Background: Adherence and persistence to treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is a predictor of the efficacy of treatment. Aims: The objectives of the study were the analysis of adherence, persistence, switches, and costs of the drugs used in MS. Methods: This is a retrospective non-interventional pharmacological observational study of 610 patients diagnosed with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) under therapy between January 2007 and September 2022. Results: Adherence values were greater than 0.75 for all the drugs in considered for the study. The mean persistence value was 2.5 years on the analysis performed on the first-line treatment. Conclusion: In a therapy in which adherence is predominant, but not exclusive to therapy efficacy, persistence to the drug is synonymous with drug efficacy.

Barriers and strategies to medication adherence amongst people with multiple sclerosis and cognitive problems

BACKGROUND

Adherence to disease-modifying treatment (DMT) amongst people with multiple sclerosis (MS) varies greatly. Although research often identifies 'forgetting' as a reason for poor adherence, few studies have considered how cognitive problems impact adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate prevalence of and barriers to adherence, including for people with MS-related cognitive problems, and to identify adherence-related strategies.

METHODS

Recruited via the UK MS Register and MS Society groups, participants completed a Medication Adherence Questionnaire and the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire. A subset were interviewed.

RESULTS

Of 257 participants, 94 % reported being adherent, although 59 % missed ≥1 dose, and 25 % reported cognitive problems. Adherence was lower amongst those with cognitive problems, who experienced more barriers: memory problems; negative feelings about taking medication; and not wanting medication to interfere with activities. Such barriers, along with mood, cognition, and method of DMT administration, explained 17 % of variance in adherence, with intravenous treatment a significant predictor. Cognitive problems explained a unique proportion of variance; however, was non-significant when anxiety was factored in. Interviews highlighted how anxiety about side-effects and injections, and difficulties accepting the diagnosis, hindered use of reminders.

CONCLUSION

Interventions for cognition and mood problems, minimising treatment burden and supporting adjustment to diagnosis, may improve adherence.

Assessment of clinician adherence to Fingolimod instructions and its effect on patient safety

OBJECTIVES

To assess clinicians' adherence to fingolimod's effective use according to the prescribed recommendations to reduce safety risk, identify the consequences, and highlight areas for improvement to policy makers for the benefit of both patient and care-giver.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary hospital targeting multiple sclerosis patients on fingolimod from January 2017 to December 2021. The physicians' adherence to the manufacturer's instructions was assessed and categorized into good, moderate, and poor based on adherence to fingolimod instructions and monitoring measures. Four monitoring measures were assessed: bradycardia observation, ophthalmic examination, liver enzymes, and infections. In addition, the impact of adherence on patient safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients were included. Seventy-twopatients (51.4%) had physician with poor adherence (followed only one instruction or none). Sixty-five patients (46.4%) had 2-3 manufacture recommendations where physician's adherence was moderate. Three patients (2.10%) had all manufacturer's recommendations. In terms of fingolimod complications, 18 patients found to have bradycardia after the first does, macular oedema and infections was reported in 4 patients, and the elevation in hepatic enzymes was reported in 6 patients. Poor physician's adherence has resulted in treatment incompleteness and highest fingolimod discontinuation or switching to other treatment options.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to fingolimod instructions was poor among physicians which resulted in highest drug switching or discontinuing rate.

Factors Associated With Disease-Modifying Therapy Adherence and Persistence in Multiple Sclerosis: A Scoping Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving disease-modifying therapies (DMT) show published adherence rates of 27.0% to 93.8% and published persistence rates of 49.7% to 96.5%. Improvements in DMT adherence and persistence are key to optimizing MS care, and enhanced understanding could improve MS disease management and identify research gaps. This scoping literature review aims to examine the nature and findings of the literature evaluating factors associated with DMT adherence and persistence in patients with MS.

METHODS

Eligible articles included in the literature review were quantitative clinical studies written in English, included adherence or persistence as primary outcomes, and accounted for covariates/confounders. The articles were assessed to identify factors associated with adherence/persistence and analyzed according to DMT type (self-injectable, oral, infusion).

RESULTS

Fifty-eight studies (103,450 patients) were included. Study distribution by DMT type was self-injectable only (n = 41), oral only (n = 2), infusion only (n = 1), and more than 1 type (n = 14). Older age and previous DMT use were associated with increased adherence and/or persistence. Increased alcohol consumption, DMT adverse events, higher education, and higher body mass index were negatively associated with adherence and/or persistence. Greater number and severity of relapses was associated with increased adherence but decreased persistence.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies examined factors associated with adherence and persistence to self-injectable DMTs. These factors should be evaluated further for oral and infusion DMTs. Insights into the modifiable factors associated with adherence and persistence could guide treatment decisions and help improve adherence and clinical outcomes.

Comparative adherence trajectories of oral disease-modifying agents in multiple sclerosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study compared the adherence trajectories of fingolimod (FIN), teriflunomide (TER), and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) users with multiple sclerosis (MS) as there is limited evidence regarding the comparative adherence patterns of different oral disease-modifying agents (DMAs).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study DATA SOURCE: 2015-2019 IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims Database.

PATIENTS

Adults (≥18 years) with MS (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9/10-Clinical Modification [CM]:340/G35) diagnosis and ≥1 DMA prescription.

INTERVENTION

Incident FIN-, TER-, or DMF use based on the index DMA with 1 year of washout period.

MEASUREMENTS

The DMA adherence trajectories based on the proportion of days covered (PDC) were examined using the Group-Based Trajectory Modeling (GBTM) one year after the treatment initiation. Generalized boosting models (GBM)-based inverse probability treatment weights (IPTW) were incorporated in multinomial logistic regression to assess the comparative adherence trajectories across oral DMAs with FIN group as a reference category.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 1913 patients with MS who were initiated with FIN (24.2%, n = 462), TER (24.0%, n = 458), and DMF (51.9%, n = 993) during 2016-2018. The adherence rate (PDC ≥ 0.8) among FIN, TER, and DMF users was found to be 70.8% (n = 327), 59.6% (n = 273), and 61.0% (n = 606), respectively. The GBTM grouped patients into three adherence trajectories: Complete Adherers-59.1%, Slow Decliners-22.6%, and Rapid Discontinuers-18.3%. The multinomial logistic regression model involving GBM-based IPTW revealed that DMF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.57-3.42) and TER (aOR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.62-3.88) users had higher odds to be rapid discontinuers relative to FIN users. In addition, TER users were more likely (aOR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.06-2.13) to be slow decliners compared with FIN users.

CONCLUSION

Teriflunomide and DMF were associated with poorer adherence trajectories than FIN. More research is needed to evaluate the clinical implications of these adherence trajectories of oral DMAs to optimize the management of MS.

Overcoming barriers to patient adherence: the case for developing innovative drug delivery systems

Poor medication adherence is a pervasive issue with considerable health and socioeconomic consequences. Although the underlying reasons are generally understood, traditional intervention strategies rooted in patient-centric education and empowerment have proved to be prohibitively complex and/or ineffective. Formulating a pharmaceutical in a drug delivery system (DDS) is a promising alternative that can directly mitigate many common impediments to adherence, including frequent dosing, adverse effects and a delayed onset of action. Existing DDSs have already positively influenced patient acceptability and improved rates of adherence across various disease and intervention types. The next generation of systems have the potential to instate an even more radical paradigm shift by, for example, permitting oral delivery of biomacromolecules, allowing for autonomous dose regulation and enabling several doses to be mimicked with a single administration. Their success, however, is contingent on their ability to address the problems that have made DDSs unsuccessful in the past.

Teriflunomide treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis: A Portuguese real-life experience

Teriflunomide is an oral disease-modifying therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. A decline in physical and cognitive functions, which negatively impacts their quality of life (QoL), is observed in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. The aim of this study was to characterise adult Portuguese relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with teriflunomide in routine clinical practice concerning their quality of life, comorbidities, treatment effectiveness, satisfaction, compliance and safety. TeriLIVE-QoL was a multicentre, non-interventional, prospective cohort study that collected demographic and clinical characteristics, patient-reported outcomes and adverse events from patients treated with teriflunomide of 14 mg over 2 years. Notably, around 18 months of this period occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the 99 participants, 25% were treatment-naïve. Annualised relapse rate and the score for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale decreased after 1 (p = 0.01) and 2 years of treatment (p < 0.001), respectively. Convenience (p = 0.001), effectiveness (p = 0.002) and global satisfaction scores (p < 0.001) presented high values (up to 95.6) and continued to improve along the study. Treatment persistence was 77%, and compliance reached 82% 2 years after initiation. Three patients experienced serious adverse events. TeriLIVE-QoL provides real-world evidence of clinical effectiveness, high treatment satisfaction, consistent safety and improved psychiatric outcomes, associated with elevated treatment persistence and compliance in patients treated with teriflunomide.iance reached 82% 2 years after initiation. Three patients experienced serious adverse events.

Post marketing new adverse effects of oral therapies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of safety information about the post-marketing adverse effects of several disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) used to control multiple sclerosis (MS). Investigating the post-marketing side effects is required to manifest the safety of the appropriate therapy. Therefore, the present systematic review aimed to identify disease-modifying drugs used to control multiple sclerosis attacks and progress.

METHODS

The Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for studies published until November 2020 based on the research strategy terms. Inclusion criteria involved all full texts exploring disease-modifying drugs used to control multiple sclerosis based on case reports and case series studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist was used to assess the quality of case report studies.

RESULTS

In total, 25 articles that met the criteria for inclusion were retrieved in the present systematic review. The most side effects were observed with fingolimod and teriflunomide, respectively, while dimethyl fumarate had minor side effects.

CONCLUSION

The oral therapies have some significant post-marketing adverse effects that have been diagnosed in numerous case reports. Some of them are serious and must be noticed by neurologists. Accordingly, in this review, we assessed the post-marketing adverse effects of oral therapies for multiple sclerosis.

Persistence, Adherence, and Switching to Higher-Cost Therapy in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Retrospective Real-World Study

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) is often hindered by poor persistence and adherence, impacted by patient-perceived efficacy concerns, adverse effects, inconvenience, and forgetfulness. This study measured persistence, adherence, and time to switching to higher-cost therapy among patients with MS initiating teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, or diroximel fumarate treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study used Symphony Health US claims data from patients with MS newly initiated on one of four oral DMTs between January and June 2020. Persistence was defined as the duration a patient continued their medication. Adherence was measured using medication possession ratio (MPR); patients with MPR ≥ 80% were considered adherent. Switching was measured by comparing proportions of patients switching and mean time to switch to one of three higher-cost therapies (ocrelizumab, natalizumab, or cladribine). Kaplan-Meier curves assessed persistence. Chi-square tests determined proportions of patients on therapy after 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 6934 patients newly initiated on oral DMTs met study inclusion criteria (teriflunomide, n = 1968; dimethyl fumarate, n = 3409; diroximel fumarate, n = 616; fingolimod, n = 941). Patients newly initiated on teriflunomide and fingolimod had significantly higher persistence rates after 12 months (60% and 66%, respectively vs 44% dimethyl fumarate and 49% diroximel fumarate; p < 0.0001), and the highest proportion of adherent patients at 6 months (71% and 76%, vs 60% dimethyl fumarate and 58% diroximel fumarate) and 12 months (55% and 59%, vs 40% dimethyl fumarate and 44% diroximel fumarate). Mean time to switching to higher-cost therapies ranged from 247 days (diroximel fumarate to natalizumab) to 342 days (teriflunomide to ocrelizumab), with the highest rate of switching in patients on dimethyl fumarate (7%).

CONCLUSION

Patients newly initiated on teriflunomide and fingolimod had better real-world persistence and adherence at 6 and 12 months, and longer time to switch to higher-cost therapies, than patients on dimethyl fumarate or diroximel fumarate.

Relationship between cognition and treatment adherence to disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: a prospective, cross-sectional study

Less than half of patients with chronic diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), adhere to their prescribed medications. Treatment selection is essential for patient adherence. The aim of this study was to explore the potential factors influencing nonadherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in MS. This prospective, cross-sectional study was performed at the Multiple Sclerosis Center between 2018 and 2021. In total, 85 patients were eligible for final analysis. Forty-one patient (48.2%) with MS were non-adherent to DMT. Male sex, oral administration of drugs, and longer treatment duration were associated with nonadherence. The mean Expanded Disability Status Scale score did not differ between the adherent and non-adherent patients (p > 0.05). Patients with a higher score on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, who were receiving self-injection therapy, had shorter treatment duration, and higher disability, were more likely to be adherent to DMT than those without. To minimize nonadherence in patients with MS, the patient's information processing speed should be considered before DMT initiation, and appropriate treatment options should be discussed.

A Targeted Literature Search and Phenomenological Review of Perspectives of People with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthcare Professionals of the Immunology of Disease-Modifying Therapies

Introduction

The mechanisms of action of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) are complex and involve an interplay of immune system components. People with MS (PwMS) may lack a clear understanding of the immunological pathways involved in MS and its treatment; effective communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS is needed to facilitate shared decision-making when discussing the disease and selecting DMTs and is particularly important in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era.

Methods

In this patient-authored two-part review, we performed a targeted literature search to assess the need for better communication between HCPs and PwMS regarding treatment selection, and also conducted a qualitative survey of four patient and care-partner authors to obtain insights regarding their understanding of and preferences for the treatment and management of MS.

Results

Following a search of the Embase and MEDLINE databases using Ovid in June 2020, an analysis of 40 journal articles and conference abstracts relating to patient empowerment and decision-making in DMT selection for MS showed a preference for safety and efficacy of treatments, followed by autonomy and convenience of administration. A need for better communication between HCPs and PwMS during treatment selection to improve patient satisfaction was also identified. The open survey responses from the patient authors revealed a need for greater involvement in decision-making processes and desire for improved communication and information tools.

Conclusions

This targeted literature search and phenomenological review confirms PwMS preferences for empowered decision-making in disease management and treatment selection, to optimize independence, safety, and efficacy. It also identifies an unmet need for improved communication and information tools that convey MS information in a relatable manner. Furthermore, this review seeks to address this unmet need by providing plain language figures and descriptions of MS immune mechanisms that can be used to facilitate discussions between HCPs and PwMS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-022-00349-5.

In multiple sclerosis (MS), there are different cells in the immune system that contribute to the disease. The main cells in the immune system are T and B cells. People with MS (PwMS) might not be familiar with details about the immune system, and healthcare professionals might not always communicate details about how treatments work clearly to PwMS when choosing treatments with them. It is important for PwMS to have all the information they need to help make decisions about treatments. This information needs to be given in a way they can understand. This is especially important during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In this paper, we first looked at what research has already been published about what is most important to PwMS when making treatment decisions. The existing research says that safety and effectiveness are the most important things and that PwMS prefer treatments that they can take themselves. PwMS also need better communication and information from doctors to make decisions and to help explain how MS treatments work in the body. Next, we gave a survey to the patients who are authors of this paper to ask about what is important to them when making treatment decisions. Their answers were very similar to the existing research. Overall, PwMS need better communication from healthcare professionals about the immune system. This paper also includes plain language descriptions and figures to help healthcare professionals explain and discuss the importance of the immune system in MS with PwMS.

Adherence to Therapy in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis-Review

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, autoimmune, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). MS is an incurable disease. The goal of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) is to slow the progression of the disease, prevent relapses and increase the patient’s overall quality of life. According to the World Health Organisation definition, adherence means the extent to which a person’s medication-taking behaviour corresponds with the agreed upon treatment recommendations from a healthcare provider. Accurate adherence is necessary for efficient treatment. Non-adherence is related to unsuccessful treatments, the risk of relapses and increased healthcare costs. The aim of this study is to present the main factors relating to non-adherence in MS patients.

Real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns and costs in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients treated with glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate or teriflunomide in Germany

Aim: To evaluate adherence, healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs for glatiramer acetate (GA; injectable), dimethyl fumarate (oral) and teriflunomide (oral) in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Patients & methods: Retrospective analyses of a claims database. Results: Teriflunomide patients were older with more co-morbidities and fewer relapses versus GA and dimethyl fumarate. GA patients were mostly disease-modifying therapies (DMTs)-treatment naive. Treatment adherence was 61-70%. All DMTs reduced HRU versus pre-index. Costs were comparable across cohorts. High adherence reduced hospitalizations and several costs versus low adherers. Conclusion: Adherence rates were high and comparable with all DMTs. Similar (and high) reductions in HRU and costs occurred with all DMTs. High adherence improved economic outcomes versus low adherence. Thus, investing in adherence improvement is beneficial to improve outcomes in relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Objective medication adherence and persistence in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence is critical for the realization of pharmacotherapy benefits and reduced healthcare expenditure. Studies have shown up to 60% of people with Multiple sclerosis (MS) experience suboptimal medication adherence, which is associated with poorer health outcomes and subsequent discontinuation. The current systematic review reported on objectively measured adherence and discontinuation rates for self-administered oral and injectable disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). OBJECTIVES: To identify whether, in people with MS, the introduction of oral DMTs has improved medication adherence when compared with injectable DMTs. The secondary aim was to report synthesized objectively measured medication adherence and persistence rates for both oral and injectable DMTs in MS across varying study durations. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted through PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO. Inclusion criteria were limited to English, peer-reviewed, objective, self-administered DMT articles, published between July 1993 to December 2019. Publications reporting combined intravenous and self-administered DMT data, or that did not account for DMT switching in discontinuation rates, were excluded. Data were synthesized into observation lengths ranging from less than 8 months to greater than 36 months. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were undertaken on both oral and injectable 12-month adherence and discontinuation data. RESULTS: In total, 61 articles were included; 46 articles examined adherence and 26 examined discontinuation. Twelve-month adherence ranged between 53.0% to 89.2% for oral (N = 7) and 47.0% to 77.4% for injectable DMTs (N = 7). Results from the meta-analysis and meta-regression show significantly higher pooled mean medication possession ratio (MPR) adherence for oral DMTs (91.0%) when compared to injectable DMTs (77.0%) over 12 months (β = -0.146; 95% CI: -0.263 to -0.029). Results indicate major asymmetry across studies (LFK index: -5.18), proposing the presence of significant publication bias. Mean discontinuation over 12 months was between 10.5% to 33.3% for oral (N = 7) and 15.2% to 50.8% for injectable DMTs (N = 10), with meta-analysis results indicating the presence of significant heterogeneity (I2 Injectable: 99.5%; I2 Oral: 93.1%) between studies included in each subgroup. However, no appreciable difference in mean discontinuation rates across groups (Injectable: 27%; 95% Cl: 19.0%-34.0%; Oral: 24%; 95% CI: 17.0%-31.0%) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Medication adherence for oral DMTs suggests a significant improvement compared to adherence for injectable DMTs. No significant difference in discontinuation rates between oral and injectable DMTs was found. Oral DMT adherence and persistence studies are limited, given their relatively recent introduction. Suboptimal medication adherence and discontinuation issues remain present for both oral and injectable DMTs. Future studies would benefit from improved consistency in methodology, such as comparable adherence and persistence definitions. DISCLOSURES: The authors did not receive any funding for this study. Mardan and Hussain have nothing to disclose. Grech reports grants from Merck Pharmaceutical, outside the submitted work. Allan reports grants received from Merck Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Allan holds advisory board and consulting positions with Merck and advisory board positions for Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis, for which Monash Institute of Neurological Diseases receives consulting fees.

Electronic pill bottles to monitor and promote medication adherence for people with multiple sclerosis: A randomized, virtual clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

We perform a randomized trial to test the impact of electronic pill bottles with audiovisual reminders on oral disease modifying therapy (DMT) adherence in people with MS (PwMS).

METHODS

Adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) taking an oral DMT were randomized 1:1 for 90 days to remote smartphone app- and pill bottle-based (a) adherence monitoring, or (b) adherence monitoring with audiovisual medication reminders. Optimal adherence was defined as the proportion of doses taken ±3 h of the scheduled time. Numbers of missed pills and pills taken early, on time, late, and extra were recorded. A multivariable regression model tested possible associations between optimal adherence and age, MS duration, cognitive functioning, and number of daily prescription pills.

RESULTS

85 participants (66 female; mean age 44.9 years) took dimethyl/diroximel fumarate (n = 49), fingolimod (n = 26), or teriflunomide (n = 10). Optimal adherence was on average higher in the monitoring with reminders arm (71.4%) than the monitoring only arm (61.6%; p = 0.033). In a multivariable model, optimal adherence was less likely in younger participants (p < 0.001) and those taking more daily prescription pills (p < 0.001). In the monitoring only arm, 4.0% of doses were taken early, 61.6% on time, 5.6% late, 4.4% in excess, and 24.4% were missed. In the reminders arm, these proportions were 3.4%, 71.4%, 3.7%, 8.7%, and 12.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We map real-world oral DMT adherence patterns using mHealth technology. PwMS who received medication reminders had higher optimal adherence. Nonadherence was more nuanced than simply missing pills. Developing strategies to improve adherence remains important in longitudinal MS care.

Association between multiple sclerosis disease severity and adherence to disease-modifying therapies

BACKGROUND: For multiple sclerosis (MS) patients taking disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), adherence to treatment is a key component of achieving beneficial outcomes, such as delayed disease progression and the reduction and prevention of symptoms and relapses. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a claims-based measure of MS disease severity on DMT adherence in a one-year study period. METHODS: Patients were identified from Humana Medicare Advantage claims data from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015. Patients over the age of 18 with at least 12 months of continuous enrollment and > 1 outpatient MS visit with DMT use prior to the index date were included. Patients who switched DMT type (oral, platform, IV) during the study period were excluded. Medication possession ratios (MPR) for DMTs were calculated from pharmacy and medical claims over 12 months of claims data, and a previously developed claims algorithm was used to determine MS disease severity. Patients with MPRs of 0.8 or higher were considered adherent to DMT treatment. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of MS disease severity, gender, DMT type, and age category with DMT adherence. RESULTS: The study population of 3,347 patients had an average MPR of 84.7 (75% were classified as adherent). Multivariable logistic analysis demonstrated that compared to the 18-45 age group, the 46-64 and 65+ age groups were 1.33 (OR: 1.33 [95% CI 1.08-1.64]) and 1.55 (OR: 1.55, [95% CI 1.18-2.05]) times more likely to be adherent. Patients with a high level of MS disease severity were 53% (OR: 0.47, [95% CI 0.36-0.62]) less likely to be adherent compared to those with low MS disease severity. No significant difference was identified for gender or DMT type (oral, platform, or IV). CONCLUSIONS: Increased age and lower MS disease severity were associated with better DMT adherence. MS disease severity should be considered when assessing risk for low DMT adherence. DISCLOSURES: No funding supported this project. The authors have nothing to disclose. Preliminary results were previously presented virtually at AMCP Annual 2020 in April 2020.

Peginterferon beta-1a was associated with high adherence and satisfaction in patients with multiple sclerosis in a German real-world study

Background:

Peginterferon beta-1a was developed for treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) to provide an interferon with increased exposure to facilitate adherence by reducing frequency of application. This non-interventional observational study investigated the adherence to peginterferon beta-1a in real-world clinical practice settings.

Methods:

This prospective study was conducted from 1/2015 to 1/2018 at 77 German MS sites. Adult patients with RRMS (previously treated or treatment-naïve) receiving peginterferon beta-1a (125 µg SC every 2 weeks) were eligible for participation. Data were documented every 3 months over 2 years (nine visits). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with overall adherence defined as ⩽10% of injections not administered throughout the 24-month observation period. Secondary endpoints included persistence, patient satisfaction, efficacy (relapse activity, disability progression), and tolerability. Patients were invited to participate in an individualised patient support programme.

Results:

Out of 250 enrolled patients, 190 (aged 18–74 years, 75.3% female) were included in the efficacy analysis. Of those, 74 patients completed the study; 33.2% were treatment-naïve. The proportion of patients with an overall adherence of >90% was 75.7% (95% CI 67.9–81.6). The annualised relapse rate was 0.17. Compared with previous therapies, the scores for treatment satisfaction and convenience were markedly higher with peginterferon beta-1a. Overall, 87.4% participated in the patient support programme, and 47.8% of patients reported adverse events.

Conclusions:

Adherence to the bi-weekly treatment with peginterferon beta-1a was very high. Although adherence could have been positively influenced by the well-accepted patient support programme, the extent could not be unequivocally evaluated. Clinical disease activity remained low. Peginterferon beta-1a was well tolerated, and there were no new relevant safety findings.

Persistence and adherence to ocrelizumab compared with other disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis in U.S. commercial claims data

BACKGROUND: Ocrelizumab (OCR) is the only disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for both relapsing and primary progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). OCR is given by intravenous (IV) infusion twice a year, which may improve adherence to the dosing schedule relative to other MS DMTs that require more frequent administration. Real-world evidence on the persistence and adherence of patients with MS to OCR compared with other DMTs is limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine the persistence and adherence to OCR compared with other DMTs for MS in the United States. METHODS: This analysis was conducted in the PharMetrics Plus commercial claims database and included patients with MS who initiated a new DMT between April 2017 and September 2018. Patients were required to have health plan enrollment for ≥ 1 year before and after DMT initiation (a subgroup analysis was performed for those with ≥ 18 months' continuous enrollment after DMT initiation). Persistence was defined as not switching to another DMT and having no gap in coverage of the initiated DMT for ≥ 60 days during the postinitiation period. The proportion of days covered (PDC) was calculated as the total days covered by the DMT during the postinitiation period divided by the length of the time period (12 or 18 months); PDC ≥ 0.8 was considered adherent. Multivariable Poisson regression models compared discontinuation (nonpersistence) and nonadherence between OCR users and users of other DMTs grouped by administration route. RESULTS: A total of 4,587 patients (OCR, 1,319; injectable, 1,051; oral, 1,876; other IV, 341) were included. The OCR group had the lowest proportion of patients discontinuing at 12 months (8% vs. 28%, 32%, and 43% for other IV, oral, and injectable, respectively) and the highest mean PDC (93% vs. 76%, 74%, and 69%, respectively). Compared with patients initiating OCR, adjusted relative risks (RR) of 12-month discontinuation were 3.3 (95% CI = 2.3-4.6), 3.8 (95% CI = 3.0-4.9), and 5.5 (95% CI = 4.1-7.5) for patients initiating other IV, oral, and injectable DMTs, respectively. Similarly, patients initiating other IV, oral, and injectable DMTs had RRs of 4.9 (95% CI = 3.6-6.8), 5.1 (95% CI = 3.9-6.6), and 6.8 (95% CI = 5.0-9.3) for 12-month nonadherence compared with OCR. A subgroup of 2,913 patients with 18 months of continuous enrollment had similar trends, with 17% in the OCR group discontinuing compared with 40%, 41%, and 55% in the other IV, oral, and injectable groups, respectively. Trends over 18 months were consistent with the 12-month analysis in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiating OCR had superior persistence and adherence at 12 and 18 months of follow-up compared with patients initiating other MS DMTs. Long-term persistence and adherence should be monitored as OCR experience accrues in a real-world setting. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Genentech (South San Francisco, CA), a member of the Roche Group. Engmann, Sheinson, Bawa, and Ng are employees of Genentech and shareholders of F. Hoffman-La Roche (Basel, Switzerland).

Quality of life among injectable and oral disease-modifying therapy users in the Pacific Northwest Multiple Sclerosis Registry

Background

Nine oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) in the United States. Few studies have examined self-reported quality of life (QoL) and functional status outcomes among patients who switch to oral medications from injectable MS therapies. This study compares self-reported QoL and disability status between participants switching from injectable to oral DMTs, to those who stay on injectable DMTs continuously for the same time period.

Methods

Longitudinal data were assessed from relapsing MS participants in the Pacific Northwest MS Registry completing a minimum of two surveys between 2012 and 2018 with a maximum of 36 months between surveys. Stayers were defined as those who remained on injectable DMTs continuously from Time 1 to Time 2; switchers were those who switched from injectable to either fingolimod, teriflunomide or dimethyl fumarate during the same time interval. Outcomes of interest were physical and psychological QoL, measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), and disability, measured by the Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS). To analyze the effect of switching to oral DMT on outcomes at Time 2, a one-to-two propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match switchers to stayers. Outcomes at Time 2 were analyzed using paired t-test for QoL scores, and Stuart Maxwell test for PDDS as a categorical variable.

Results

Among 2385 participants who returned consecutive yearly surveys, 413 met the inclusion criteria for stayers and 66 for switchers. After one-to-two PSM, 124 stayers were matched to 62 switchers. Paired t-test showed no differences between switchers and stayers for physical (mean difference: − 0.41; [95% confidence interval CI: − 3.3-2.4]; p = 0.78) or psychological (mean difference: − 0.23; [95% CI, − 1.6- 1.1]; p = 0.74) QoL. Additionally, no differences were seen between switchers and stayers in self-reported disability status.

Conclusions

MS registry participants who switched to an oral DMT from injectable showed no significant differences in QoL or self-reported disability status compared to those remaining on injectable DMT continuously in the same time period.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-020-02016-4.

Comparative Adherence Trajectories of Oral Fingolimod and Injectable Disease Modifying Agents in Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Oral fingolimod is convenient to use than injectable disease modifying agents (DMAs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the existing literature regarding the comparative adherence trajectories between oral fingolimod and injectable DMAs is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the adherence trajectories between oral DMA, fingolimod, and injectable DMAs in patients with MS.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted using adults (≥18 years) with MS (ICD-9-CM: 340 and a DMA prescription) from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database between 2010 and 2012. Patients were grouped into oral fingolimod or injectable DMA users based on the index DMA among patients with MS. The annual DMA adherence trajectories, based on the proportion of days covered (PDC), were examined using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) during the one-year follow-up period after treatment initiation. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression using stabilized inverse probability treatment weights (IPTW) was performed to assess the association between the DMA route of administration (Oral vs Injectable) and the adherence trajectory groups. The balance of covariates between oral and injectable DMAs before and after IPTW was checked against a standardized difference threshold of 0.25.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 1,700 MS patients who were initiated with oral (15.8%) or injectable (84.2%) DMAs between 2010 and 2012. The adherence rates (PDC≥0.8) in oral fingolimod and injectable DMA users were found to be 64.7% and 50.8%, respectively. The GBTM grouped individuals in the study cohort into three adherence trajectories - rapid discontinuers (23.5%), complete adherers (49.9%), and slow decliners (26.6%). The multinomial logistic regression model with stabilized IPTW revealed that oral fingolimod users had higher odds to be a complete adherer (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.85-4.16) or a slow discontinuer (AOR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.70-4.05) than injectable DMA users.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral DMA fingolimod was associated with better adherence than injectable DMAs across group-based trajectories. Further research is warranted to evaluate the adherence trajectories with newer oral DMAs introduced in the last decade for MS.

Real-world adherence to, and persistence with, once- and twice-daily oral disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, including higher rates of relapse and disease progression, and higher medical resource use. A systematic review and quantification of adherence and persistence with oral DMDs would help clarify the extent of nonadherence and nonpersistence in patients with MS to help prescribers make informed treatment plans and optimize patient care. The objectives were to: 1) conduct a systematic literature review to assess the availability and variability of oral DMD adherence and/or persistence rates across 'real-world' data sources; and 2) conduct meta-analyses of the rates of adherence and persistence for once- and twice-daily oral DMDs in patients with MS using real-world data.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies published between January 2010 and April 2018 in the PubMed database was performed. Only studies assessing once- and twice-daily oral DMDs were available for inclusion in the analysis. Study quality was evaluated using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, a tool for assessing quality of observational studies. The random effects model evaluated pooled summary estimates of nonadherence.

RESULTS

From 510 abstracts, 31 studies comprising 16,398 patients with MS treated with daily oral DMDs were included. Overall 1-year mean medication possession ratio (MPR; n = 4 studies) was 83.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.5-92.1%) and proportion of days covered (PDC; n = 4 studies) was 76.5% (95% CI 72.0-81.1%). Pooled 1-year MPR ≥80% adherence (n = 6) was 78.5% (95% CI 63.5-88.5%) and PDC ≥80% (n = 5 studies) was 71.8% (95% CI 59.1-81.9%). Pooled 1-year discontinuation (n = 20) was 25.4% (95% CI 21.6-29.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one in five patients with MS do not adhere to, and one in four discontinue, daily oral DMDs before 1 year. Opportunities to improve adherence and ultimately patient outcomes, such as patient education, medication support/reminders, simplified dosing regimens, and reducing administration or monitoring requirements, remain. Implementation of efforts to improve adherence are essential to improving care of patients with MS.

Impact of Switching to Fingolimod Versus Injectable Disease-Modifying Therapy Cycling on Risk of Multiple Sclerosis-Related Relapses: A Retrospective Analysis

Background

Clinical and real-world studies have shown significant reductions in multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses with fingolimod versus injectable disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Multiple sclerosis relapse rate and incidence were compared in patients switching from an injectable DMT to fingolimod and those cycling from one injectable DMT to another or remaining on their original injectable DMT.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed using Commercial and Medicare Supplemental claims data (July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2016) of adults with MS receiving ≥1 injectable DMT. Relapses were identified from MS-related hospitalization, outpatient emergency department or office visit, and corticosteroid administration. Annualized relapse rate ratio was estimated.

Results

Of 16,352 patients, 1110 were switchers to fingolimod, 908 were injectable DMT cyclers, and 14,334 were nonswitchers. At baseline, rate and incidence of MS relapses were higher in switchers and injectable DMT cyclers versus nonswitchers (P < .001); mean ± SD relapse rates declined from 0.4 ± 0.7, 0.4 ± 0.7, and 0.2 ± 0.5 at baseline to 0.2 ± 0.5, 0.3 ± 0.6, and 0.1 ± 0.4 after follow-up in switchers, injectable DMT cyclers, and nonswitchers, respectively. Relapse incidence declined in each cohort. The highest reductions in relapse rate and incidence were in switchers to fingolimod, where relapse risk was significantly reduced versus injectable DMT cyclers (22%, P = .0433) and nonswitchers (47%, P < .001).

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that patients switching from an injectable DMT to fingolimod have the highest reductions in annualized rate and incidence of MS relapses and significantly reduced risk of relapse versus injectable DMT cyclers and nonswitchers.

Spanish real-world experience with fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: MS NEXT study

Purpose

The objective of this study was to characterize the demographic and clinical profile of RRMS patients receiving fingolimod in Spain, and to evaluate drug effectiveness and safety in clinical practice.

Methods

This observational, retrospective, multicentre, nationwide study was performed at 56 Spanish hospitals and involved 804 RRMS patients who received oral fingolimod (0.5 mg) since November 2011, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

Results

The mean annualized relapse rate (ARR) in the year before fingolimod was 1.08 and the median EDSS was 3; patients were exposed to fingolimod for 2.2 years as average; regarding magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, more than half of the patients had >20 lesions at baseline. Patients were previously treated with first-line injectable DMTs (60.3%), or natalizumab (31.3%), and 8.3% were naïve patients. Overall, the ARR significantly decreased to 0.28, 0.22 and 0.17 (74.1%, 79.7% and 83.5% of relative reduction, respectively) after 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment, P<0.001. The ARR of patients who switched from natalizumab to fingolimod was stable over the study. Most of the patients (88.7%) were free from confirmed disability and MRI activity (67.3%) after 24 months. The persistence after 12 months on fingolimod was 93.9%.

Conclusions

The subgroups of patients analysed showed differential baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. The analysis of patients who received fingolimod in routine clinical practice confirmed adequate efficacy and safety, even for long-term treatment. The present data also confirmed the positive benefit/risk balance with fingolimod in real-world clinical practice setting.

Time to treatment failure following initiation of fingolimod versus teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims study

Objective: Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) aim to delay progression and reduce relapses. Evidence is limited on the comparative effectiveness of the oral DMTs fingolimod and teriflunomide. This study evaluated time to treatment failure among patients with MS who initiated fingolimod versus teriflunomide in real-world settings.Methods: The retrospective cohort included 18-64 year old patients diagnosed with MS who initiated fingolimod or teriflunomide during 12 September 2012 to 30 September 2015 within MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Claims. Patients were followed from treatment initiation (index date) until first treatment failure or censoring. Treatment failure was defined as the first occurrence of MS relapse (identified using a validated algorithm) or treatment discontinuation (≥60 day supply gap). Treatment failure was examined through Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression adjusting for 1 year baseline factors (age, gender, plan type, region, index year, prior DMT use, baseline relapses, Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] and MS symptoms).Results: On average, patients treated with fingolimod (n = 2704) were younger (43.6 versus 49.8 years) with lower CCI (0.4 versus 0.7) and more relapses at baseline (0.46 versus 0.42) than those treated with teriflunomide (n = 1859). Median time to treatment failure was 19.5 months with fingolimod versus 9.6 months with teriflunomide (p < .001). After controlling key demographic and clinical characteristics through multivariable regression, fingolimod was associated with 38.9% lower hazards of treatment failure versus teriflunomide (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.611; 95% CI: 0.559-0.669; p < .001).Conclusions: In a large cohort of US adults with MS, controlling for key baseline characteristics, fingolimod was associated with significantly longer time to treatment failure and lower risk of treatment failure compared with teriflunomide.

Promoting transitions of care, safety, and medication adherence for patients taking fingolimod in community pharmacies

PURPOSE

The development and dissemination of a specialty pharmacy service to optimize fingolimod therapy management are described.

SUMMARY

Fingolimod was the first oral therapy developed to counter relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Pharmacovigilance measures and individualized support are strongly recommended due to associated safety concerns. The Fingolimod Patient Support Program (F-PSP) was developed and disseminated within a community pharmacy network. The F-PSP aims to ensure responsible use of fingolimod and patient empowerment by promoting medication adherence and patient safety through a person-centered and integrated care approach. It complements basic pharmacy services through 2 interventions: medication adherence support and pharmacovigilance tailored to fingolimod. The adherence intervention combines motivational interviewing with longitudinal electronic medication adherence monitoring. The pharmacovigilance component consists of informing patients of fingolimod recommendations, reminding patients of recommended medical tests, and tracking and monitoring symptoms, especially those of potential serious adverse fingolimod reactions. A secure Web platform guides the pharmacist in conducting interviews and enables collection of patient-reported outcome data. A transition care pharmacist proposes program participation to all patients initiated on fingolimod, performs enrollment, and coordinates transfers to patient-designated community pharmacies for ongoing care.

CONCLUSION

The F-PSP enables support of individual patients, and also provides real-world data, helping to bridge the gap between practice and research. The F-PSP is intended to be a generic model of a specialty pharmacy service that is transferable to any other healthcare context, specialty drug or disease.

Multiple modality approach to assess adherence to medications across time in Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Medication adherence is especially challenging in a chronic condition such as Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS). Medication adherence among persons with MS (PwMS) is usually assessed via a single measure, mostly electronic pharmacy records.

OBJECTIVES

Assess medication adherence in multiple modes across time among PwMS; examine consistency across time and associations between measures.

METHODS

PwMS (N = 194) were surveyed prospectively at three time points (baseline, 6 and 12 months later) and their health records and medication claims were retrospectively obtained. Adherence score was based on medication possession ratio (MPR) and two patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Electronic monitoring devices assessing medication adherence were also initiated.

RESULTS

MPR of each nonadherent PwMS, once compared to medical records containing prescription changes, was found as underestimating adherence. MPR was between the two PROs in identifying nonadherence and associations between the measures and across time was moderate (Kappa ranged 0.37-0.42). The use of electronic monitoring devices was not adopted by patients. A score indicated adherence as 66% and 64.9% at Time1 and Time 2, respectively, with 21.1% of PwMS nonadherent at both time points. Adherence did not vary significantly by DMT type.

CONCLUSIONS

Being a dynamic behavior, medication adherence should be repeatedly monitored by using multiple modalities and focused on in clinician-patient encounters, especially in chronic diseases such as MS, which requires long-term treatments. Applying PROs in monitoring medication adherence would facilitate implementation of Participatory Medicine and patient-centered strategies in MS care.

[The pegylated form of interferon beta in the treatment of multiple sclerosis]

Interferons-beta (IFN-β) along with glatiramer acetate is one of the most commonly used disease modifying treatment (DMT) of multiple sclerosis (MS) associated with effectiveness and acceptable safety profile. At the same time, therapy with IFN-β has a number of limitations associated with a high frequency of injections and production of neutralizing antibodies. The development of the pegylated form of IFN-β (PEG-IFN-β) is aimed at resolving these issues. This article reviewed the mechanism of action, efficacy, safety and tolerability of PEG-IFN-β in the treatment of MS.

Economic burden of multiple sclerosis on Kuwait health care system

BACKGROUND

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease with heavy economic and social burdens resulting in significant disability.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to (1) measure the cost of health resources utilization by MS patients and (2) to examine the difference in utilization and its attributed costs amongst patients who may have a different course of MS and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study using Kuwait National MS registry was conducted to estimate the costs of utilization of resources from 2011 to 2015.

RESULTS

Between the period 2011-2015, 1344 MS patients were included in the registry. The average annual cost per MS patient has increased from $10,271 in 2011 to $17,296 in 2015. Utilization of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) was the main driver of costs reaching 89.9% in 2015. Throughout the five-year period, the occurrence of relapses decreased from 21.8% to 12.2% (p <0.0001). During this same period, ambulatory relapse treatment increased by 5.8% while hospitalizations decreased by 2.6%. Patients with a moderate EDSS score (3.5-6) had the highest average cost (p<0.0001) compared to mild and severe EDSS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple sclerosis has been a significant economic burden on the Kuwait healthcare system. DMTs are the main driver of cost.

Real-world durability of relapse rate reduction in patients with multiple sclerosis receiving fingolimod for up to 3 years: a retrospective US claims database analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess real-world durability of reduction in relapse rates among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving fingolimod therapy over a longer-term period of follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with MS who initiated fingolimod were identified from a US claims database (January 1, 2009 to September 30, 2016) and followed for 3 years post-initiation. Annualized relapse rates (ARRs) were calculated during the 1-year pre-initiation period, and during each year over the 3-year follow-up period. Time from fingolimod initiation to discontinuation (≥60-day treatment gap) was also summarized.

RESULTS

Among 1599 fingolimod initiators, 1158 (72%) had continuous fingolimod use up to the start of year 2 and 937 (59%) had continuous fingolimod use up to the start of year 3. The mean baseline ARR during the 1-year pre-initiation period for all initiators was 0.51. After fingolimod initiation, mean ARRs were consistently lower in each year of follow-up: 0.25 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.28) in year 1 for all fingolimod initiators, 0.22 (0.18, 0.25) in year 2 for patients with continuous fingolimod use up to the start of year 2, and 0.23 (0.19, 0.27) in year 3 for patients with continuous fingolimod use up to the start of year 3. Median time on treatment was 33 months for all patients initiating fingolimod.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MS who received continuous fingolimod therapy experienced a sustained reduction in relapse rates (>50% vs. baseline) during each year of a 3-year follow-up period.

A retrospective claims analysis: Compliance and discontinuation rates among Canadian patients with multiple sclerosis treated with disease-modifying therapies

BACKGROUND

Compliance to disease modifying therapy (DMT) is associated with a reduced risk of relapse, lower healthcare resource utilization, and improved health-related quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Our objective was to assess the compliance and discontinuation rates of fingolimod relative to other oral, injectable, and infusible DMTs available on the market at the time of the study in Canada in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS).

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted a retrospective claims analysis. Patients with RRMS with ≥ 1 prescription for each DMT were included. Compliance (medication possession ratio of ≥ 80%) and discontinuation (gap > 30 days from the end of the index prescription) were calculated at the 6-, 12- and 24-month time points. Compliance with fingolimod at the 6-, 12- and 24-month time points was 75%, 75% and 70%, respectively; compared with DMF [70% (P < 0.001), 68% (P < 0.001), and 56% (P < 0.001), respectively], and BRACE [53% (P < 0.001), 47% (P < 0.001), and 35% (P < 0.001), respectively]. Compliance with fingolimod was comparable to teriflunomide at each time point, but was higher compared to natalizumab [70% versus 57% (P < 0.001)] at the 24-month time point. At the 6-, 12- and 24-month time points, patients on fingolimod had the lowest discontinuation rate (26%, 24%, and 29%, respectively) compared to BRACE [49% (P < 0.001), 44% (P < 0.001), and 57% (P < 0.001)], respectively], and natalizumab [33% (P < 0.001), 29% (P < 0.001), and 45% (P < 0.001), respectively], and was similar to teriflunomide (26%, 25%, and 31%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The compliance rate in fingolimod treated patients at the 24 month time point was higher than that observed in natalizumab treated patients. The discontinuation rate was lower with fingolimod compared to other DMTs at all time points but was similar to teriflunomide.

Clinical evaluation of dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: efficacy, safety, patient experience and adherence

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an oral disease-modifying therapy approved for management of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Results from phase 3 clinical trials (DEFINE, CONFIRM) and follow-up study (ENDORSE) have provided good evidence for its efficacy and safety profile. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessment revealed stabilization or boost in health-related quality of life and work productivity of patients treated with DMF compared to placebo reflecting a higher patient satisfaction to therapy. Being an oral agent with relatively favorable risk versus benefit profile DMF is commonly prescribed first-line agent. However, literature suggests that intolerance to side effects, especially gastrointestinal adverse effects and flushing is one of the major causes to compromised therapeutic compliance. An increase in the real-world incidence of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and liver abnormality cases is also concerning. Several prevention and mitigation strategies like patient counseling, dose up-titration, pretreatment with aspirin, use of symptomatic therapy and frequent blood monitoring have demonstrated to be effective in tackling these adverse effects and promoting adherence to DMF. In this article, we review the efficacy, safety, PROs and patient adhere data, along with various measures to manage adverse events and promote compliance.

Associations Between Treatment Satisfaction, Medication Beliefs, and Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Background

Adherence to disease-modifying therapy (DMT) remains problematic for many patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). An improved understanding of factors affecting DMT adherence may inform effective interventions. This study examined associations between treatment satisfaction, medication beliefs, and DMT adherence.

Methods

A survey was mailed in 2016 to 600 adult patients with relapsing-remitting MS taking an injectable or oral DMT. Patients were sampled from the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry. The survey measured self-reported DMT adherence (doses taken divided by doses prescribed during previous 2-week period-adherence ≥0.80), DMT satisfaction using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II, medication beliefs using the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire, and demographic and clinical covariates. Relationships between variables were examined using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Final analyses included 489 usable surveys. Mean ± SD participant age was 60.5 ± 8.3 years. Most respondents were white (93.8%), female (86.6%), taking an injectable DMT (66.9%), and adherent to DMT (92.8%). Significant predictors of DMT adherence were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.086; 95% CI, 1.020-1.158; P = .011), type of DMT (oral vs. injectable; OR, 23.350; 95% CI, 2.254-241.892; P = .008), and DMT experience (naive vs. experienced; OR, 2.831; 95% CI, 1.018-7.878; P = .046).

Conclusions

In patients with MS sampled from a patient registry, treatment satisfaction and medication beliefs were not significantly associated with DMT adherence. Based on significant predictors, younger patients, patients taking injectable DMTs, and patients with previous experience with another DMT(s) are at higher risk for nonadherence. Future research is warranted to assess relationships between variables in more diverse MS populations.

First-line disease-modifying drugs in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an Italian real-life multicenter study on persistence

OBJECTIVE

The introduction of oral disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) in addition to the available, injectable, ones for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) could be expected to improve medication persistence due to a greater acceptability of the route of administration. The aim of the study was to compare the proportion of patients discontinuing injectable DMDs (interferon beta 1a/1b, pegylated interferon, glatiramer acetate) with those discontinuing oral DMDs (dimethylfumarate and teriflunomide) during an observation period of at least 12 months. Secondary aims were to compare the time to discontinuation and the reasons for discontinuation between the two groups and to explore the demographic and clinical factors associated with DMD discontinuation.

METHODS

In this prospective, multi-center, real-life observational study, patients commencing any first-line DMD between 1 January 2015 and 31 July 2016 were enrolled and followed up for at least 12 months or until the drug was discontinued.

RESULTS

Of the 520 included patients, 262 (49.6%) started an injectable and 258 (50.4%) an oral DMD. There was no difference in the proportion of patients on oral (n = 62, 24%) or on injectable (n = 60, 23%) DMDs discontinuing treatment, the most frequent reason being adverse events/side-effects. Higher baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores and younger age increased the odds of treatment withdrawal. Time to treatment discontinuation was not different between the two groups and was not influenced by the initiated DMD (oral versus injectable), even after adjustment for baseline differences.

CONCLUSION

The route of administration alone (i.e. oral versus injectable) was not a significant predictor of persistence with first-line DMDs in RRMS.

Phase IV study of retention on fingolimod versus injectable multiple sclerosis therapies: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

In relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), suboptimal adherence to injectable disease-modifying therapies (iDMTs; interferon β-1a/b, glatiramer acetate) is common, reducing their effectiveness. Patient retention on oral fingolimod and iDMTs was evaluated in PREFERMS, a randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, open-label, 48-week study.

METHODS

Patients were included if they had RRMS, were aged 18-65 years and had Expanded Disability Status Scale score up to 6, enrolled at 117 US study sites, were treatment naïve or had received only one iDMT class. Patients were randomized 1:1 (fingolimod 0.5 mg/day; preselected iDMT) by interactive voice-and-web-response system without blinding, followed up quarterly, and allowed one study-approved treatment switch after 12 weeks, or earlier for efficacy or safety reasons. The primary outcome was patient retention on randomized treatment over 48 weeks. Secondary endpoints included patient-reported outcomes, brain volume loss (BVL), and cognitive function.

RESULTS

Analysis of 433/436 patients receiving fingolimod and 428/439 receiving iDMTs showed that patient retention rate was significantly higher with fingolimod than with iDMTs [352 (81.3%) versus 125 (29.2%); 95% confidence interval 46.4-57.8%; p < 0.0001]. The most common treatment switch was from iDMT to fingolimod for injection-related reasons. Patient satisfaction was greater and BVL less with fingolimod than with iDMTs, with no difference in cognitive function. Adverse events were consistent with established tolerability profiles for each treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In RRMS, fingolimod was associated with better treatment retention, patient satisfaction and BVL outcomes than iDMTs. Patients may persist with iDMTs, but many may switch treatment if permitted. Treatment satisfaction fosters adherence, a prerequisite for optimal outcomes.

Real-World Adherence and Persistence to Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Over 1 Year

BACKGROUND

Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are indicated to reduce relapse rates and slow disease progression for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients when taken as prescribed. Nonadherence or non-persistence in the real-world setting can lead to greater risk for negative clinical outcomes. Although previous research has demonstrated greater adherence and persistence to oral DMTs compared with injectable DMTs, comparisons among oral DMTs are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To compare adherence, persistence, and time to discontinuation among MS patients newly prescribed the oral DMTs fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, or teriflunomide.

METHODS

This retrospective study used MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental claims databases. MS patients with ≥ 1 claim for specified DMTs from April 1, 2013, to June 30, 2013, were identified. The index drug was defined as the first oral DMT within this period. To capture patients newly initiating index DMTs, patients could not have a claim for their index drugs in the previous 12 months. Baseline characteristics were described for patients in each treatment cohort. Adherence, as measured by medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC); persistence (30-day gap allowed); and time to discontinuation over a 12-month follow-up period were compared across treatment cohorts. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to examine adherence, and Cox regression models estimated risk of discontinuation.

RESULTS

1,498 patients newly initiated oral DMTs and met study inclusion criteria: fingolimod (n = 185), dimethyl fumarate (n = 1,160), and teriflunomide (n = 143). Patients were similar across most baseline characteristics, including region, relapse history, and health care resource utilization. Statistically significant differences were observed across the treatment cohorts for age, gender, previous injectable/infused DMT use, and comorbidities. Adherence and time to discontinuation were adjusted for age, gender, region, previous oral and injectable/infused DMT use, relapse history, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Relative to fingolimod patients, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide patients were significantly less likely to have an MPR ≥ 80% (OR = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.09-0.36; P < 0.001 and OR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.08-0.42; P < 0.001, respectively). Similarly, relative to fingolimod patients, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide patients were significantly less likely to have PDC ≥ 80% (OR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.33-0.67; P < 0.001 and OR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.23-0.59; P < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, the HR for discontinuation was about 2 times greater for dimethyl fumarate (HR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.44-2.59; P < 0.001) and teriflunomide patients (HR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.57-3.28; P < 0.001) compared with fingolimod.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting, patients taking fingolimod had better adherence and persistence compared with patients taking other oral DMTs over 12 months. Coupled with clinical factors, medication adherence and persistence should be important considerations when determining coverage decisions for MS patients.

DISCLOSURES

This research was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Johnson, Lin, Ko, and Herrera are employed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals and own Novartis stock. Huanxue Zhou is employed by KMK Consulting, which provides consulting services to Novartis. Study concept and design were contributed by Johnson, Lin, Ko, and Herrera. Zhou collected the data, and data interpretation was performed by Johnson, Lin, Ko, and Herrera. All authors were involved in manuscript revision. The abstract for this study was presented at the AMCP Nexus 2015; October 26-29, 2015; Orlando, Florida.

Real-world persistence with fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review reports of fingolimod persistence in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) across data sources and practice settings, and to develop a consensus estimate of the 1-year real-world persistence rate.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and abstracts from selected conferences [2013-2015]) to identify observational studies reporting 1-year fingolimod persistence among adult patients with RRMS (sample size ≥50). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate a synthesized 1-year persistence rate and to assess heterogeneity across studies.

RESULTS

Of 527 publications identified, 25 real-world studies reporting 1-year fingolimod persistence rates were included. The studies included patients from different data sources (e.g., administrative claims, electronic medical records, or registries), used different definitions of persistence (e.g., based on prescriptions refills, patient report, or prescription orders), and spanned multiple geographic regions. Reported 1-year persistence rates ranged from 72%-100%, and exhibited statistical evidence of heterogeneity (I² = 93% of the variability due to heterogeneity across studies). The consensus estimate of the 1-year persistence rate was 82% (95% confidence interval: 79%-85%).

CONCLUSIONS

Across heterogeneous study designs and patient populations found in real-world studies, the consensus 1-year fingolimod persistence rate exceeded 80%, consistent with persistence rates identified in the recently-completed trial, PREFERMS.

Adherence, persistence, and discontinuation among Hispanic and African American patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod or glatiramer acetate

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have examined compliance to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) in minority populations. This study compared adherence, discontinuation, and persistence for fingolimod (FTY) and glatiramer acetate (GA) initiators among Hispanic and African American patients with MS.

METHODS

This retrospective claims data study examined Hispanic and African American adults with MS who initiated FTY or GA between September 1, 2010 and June 30, 2014. Outcomes (adherence, discontinuation, and persistence) were analyzed descriptively and with multivariable models, comparing FTY and GA cohorts within racial/ethnic groups. Adherence was assessed using medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC).

RESULTS

There were 171 patients in the Hispanic group (62 FTY, 109 GA) and 210 in the African American group (71 FTY, 139 GA). A larger proportion of GA initiators than FTY initiators were treatment-naïve; other baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts. Hispanic FTY initiators had greater mean MPR, PDC, and persistence and less discontinuation than GA initiators. African American FTY initiators had greater mean PDC than GA initiators; other outcomes favored FTY but were not statistically significant. Multivariable analysis results were consistent with the unadjusted results, but differences between treatment cohorts were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic and African American patients with MS who initiated FTY had higher adherence than those who initiated GA, similar to the general MS population. These findings suggest that adherence should be considered in DMT selection, and racial/ethnic variations in MS disease course may not be primarily attributable to differences in DMT compliance.

Treatment satisfaction across injectable, infusion, and oral disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The recent approval of oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) has provided patients with a new route of therapy administration. Little research has compared patients' experiences with and perceptions of injectable, infusion and oral MS therapies.

METHODS

Three hundred fifty-seven treated MS patients enrolled in the CLIMB study completed the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM). The TSQM provides information regarding perceived effectiveness, side effects, convenience and overall satisfaction. The patients were treated with either interferon beta-1a intramuscular (IFNβ-1a IM) (n = 40), interferon beta-1a subcutaneous (IFNβ-1a SC) (n = 45), glatiramer acetate (GA) (n = 118), natalizumab (NTZ) (n = 44), fingolimod (n = 66), or dimethyl fumarate (BG-12) (n = 44). Multivariable linear regression models were used to compare treatment satisfaction across all DMTs and between patients treated with injectable (n = 203), infusion (n = 44), and oral (n = 110) DMTs. All models were adjusted for sex, age, EDSS, and time on treatment.

RESULTS

Patients taking oral DMTs reported significantly higher convenience scores compared to patients taking either injectable or infusion DMTs. The adjusted difference in the mean overall convenience score was 26.87 (95% CI: 21.4, 32.34) for the comparison of orals and injectables and 17.53 (95% CI: 11.15, 23.9) for the comparison of orals and infusion. In addition, the proportion of patients reporting a side effect was significantly lower for orals compared to injectables (adjusted OR= 0.35; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.68) and infusion compared to injectables (adjusted OR= 0.14; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Patients reported treatment with the oral medications as more convenient than the injectable and infusion DMTs.

Two studies in one: A propensity-score-matched comparison of fingolimod versus interferons and glatiramer acetate using real-world data from the independent German studies, PANGAEA and PEARL

BACKGROUND

This study compared outcomes following fingolimod or BRACE treatments (beta-interferons/glatiramer acetate) in patients with active MS (≥ 1 relapse in the previous year) following previous BRACE treatment.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Patients with active MS who previously received BRACE were identified from German prospective, observational studies, PANGAEA and PEARL. A novel methodology was developed to compare outcomes between propensity-score-matched cohorts (3:1 ratio) from the independent single-arm studies. Patients in PANGAEA (n = 1287) experienced 48% fewer relapses per year than those in PEARL (n = 429; annualized relapse rate ratio: 0.52; p < 0.001). The risk of 3-month or 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) was reduced in PANGAEA versus PEARL (3-month: 37% reduction; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; p < 0.001; 6-month: 47% reduction; HR, 0.53; p < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients in PANGAEA (n = 1234) than PEARL (n = 401) were free from relapses and 3-month (65.7% vs 38.7%; p < 0.001) or 6-month (68.2% vs 39.2%; p < 0.001) CDP. The probability of confirmed disability improvement was higher in PANGAEA (n = 1163) than PEARL (n = 372; 3-month: 175% increase; HR, 2.75; p < 0.001; 6-month: 126% increase; HR, 2.26; p < 0.001). Patients in PANGAEA (n = 149) were less likely than those in PEARL (n = 307) to have taken sick leave (proportion with 0 days off work: 62.4% vs 44.6%; p = 0.0005). For change in disease severity from baseline (assessed by clinicians using the Clinical Global Impressions scale; PANGAEA, n = 1207; PEARL, n = 427), a larger proportion of patients had subjective improvement and a smaller proportion had worsening status in PANGAEA than PEARL (improvement: 28.2% vs 15.2%; worsening: 16.4% vs 30.4%; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Fingolimod appears to be more effective than BRACE in improving clinical and physician-/patient-reported outcomes in individuals with active MS.

Adherence to disease-modifying therapies and its impact on relapse, health resource utilization, and costs among patients with multiple sclerosis

Purpose

To evaluate adherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) initiating oral and injectable DMTs, and to estimate the impact of adherence on relapse, health resource utilization, and medical costs.

Patients and methods

Commercially insured MS patients (aged 18–65 years, two or more MS diagnoses, one or more DMT claims) with continuous eligibility 12 months before and after the first DMT claim date (index date) and no DMT claim during the pre-index period were identified from a large commerical claims database for the period from January 1, 2008, to September 30, 2015. Adherence to the index DMT was measured by the 12-month post-index proportion of days covered (PDC) and compared between oral and injectable DMT initiators. After adjustment for sex, age at index DMT, and comorbidities, regression models examined the relationship between adherence and relapse risk, MS-related health resource utilization, and non-drug medical costs (2015 US$).

Results

The study covered 12,431 patients and nine DMTs. Adherence to the index DMT did not differ significantly between oral (n=1,018) and injectable (n=11,413) DMTs when assessed by mean PDC (0.7257±0.2934 vs 0.7259±0.2869, respectively; P=0.0787), or percentages achieving PDC ≥0.8 (61.4% vs 58.6%, respectively; P=0.0806). Compared to non-adherence, adherence to DMT significantly reduced the likelihood of relapse in the post-index 12 months by 42%, hospitalization by 52%, and emergency visits by 38% (all, P<0.0001). Adherent patients would be expected to have on average 0.7 fewer outpatient visits annually versus non-adherent patients (P<0.0001). Based on the differences in predicted mean costs, adherence (vs non-adherence) would decrease the total annual medical care costs by $5,816 per patient, including hospitalization costs by $1,953, emergency visits by $171, and outpatient visits by $2,802.

Conclusion

Adherence remains suboptimal but comparable between oral and injectable DMTs. Potential health and economic benefits underscore the importance of improving adherence in MS.

Assessment of treatment patterns associated with injectable disease-modifying therapy among relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients

Background

Availability of oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) may affect injectable DMT (iDMT) treatment patterns.

Objective

The objective of this paper is to evaluate iDMT persistency, reasons for persistency lapses, and outcomes among newly diagnosed RRMS patients.

Methods

Medical records of 300 RRMS patients initiated on iDMT between 2008 and 2013 were abstracted from 18 US-based neurology clinics. Eligible patients had ≥3 visits: pre-iDMT initiation, iDMT initiation (index), and ≥1 visit within 24 months post-index. MS-related symptoms, relapses, iDMT treatment patterns (i.e. persistency, discontinuation, switching, and restart), and reasons for non-persistency were tracked for 24 months.

Results

At 24 months, iDMT persistency was 61.0%; 28.0% of patients switched to another DMT, 8.0% discontinued, and 3.0% stopped and restarted the same iDMT. The most commonly identified reasons for non-persistency were perceived lack of efficacy (22.2%), adverse events (18.8%), and fear of needles/self-injecting (9.4%). At 24 months, 38.0% of patients had experienced a relapse and 11.0% had changes in MRI lesion counts. Patients without MS-related symptoms at index reported increases in the incidence of these symptoms at 24 months.

Conclusions

Non-persistency with iDMT remains an issue in the oral DMT age. Many patients still experienced relapses and disease progression, and should consider switching to more effective therapies.

Impact of fampridine on quality of life: clinical benefit in real-world practice

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of fampridine in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in real clinical practice and to analyse adherence to treatment and general satisfaction of patients in terms of quality of life (QOL).

Methods

Patients who started treatment with fampridine from May 2014 to October 2014 were included. Primary and secondary outcomes were Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) and MS Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12) respectively, measured at baseline and 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months. Adherence was measured by the Morisky-Green questionnaire, patient satisfaction with a visual analogue scale (VAS) and QOL with improvement in mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort or anxiety/depression.

Results

30 patients (46.7% women) of mean age 39 years, mean MS duration 13.7 years, mean Expanded Disability Status Scale score 5.8, 57% with relapsing-remitting MS were included. 22 patients (73%) continued to take treatment throughout the study period. Two weeks after treatment initiation all measures improved significantly from baseline (T25FW: -7.5 s, p<0.05; MSWS-12: -36.7, p<0.05). At 6 months, walking speed and self-perceived walking ability were significantly improved (T25FW: -3.8 s, p<0.05; MSWS-12: -30.0, p<0.05). Adverse events were reported by 30% of patients. Seizures were registered in one patient. 70% of patients were adherent with treatment. Median (IQR) general satisfaction VAS score was 8 (7-9). Patients reported an improvement in mobility (70%), anxiety/depression (33.3%), self-care (23.3%), daily activities (23.3%) and pain/discomfort (3.3%).

Conclusions

Fampridine is effective and safe in patients with MS in real clinical practice up to 6 months. Adherence to treatment was suboptimal but patients' general satisfaction was high and fampridine improved several items of QOL.

Adherence to fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: an investigator-initiated, prospective, observational, single-center cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Adherence to multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment is essential to optimize the likelihood of full treatment effect. This prospective, observational, single-center cohort study investigated adherence to fingolimod over the 2 years following treatment initiation. Two facets of adherence - implementation and persistence - were examined and compared between new and experienced users of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Implementation rates were based on the proportion of days covered and calculated as percentages per half-yearly visits and over 2 years, captured through refill data, pill count, and self-report. Nonadherence was defined as taking less than 85.8% of prescribed pills. Implementation rates were classified as nonadherent (<85.8%), suboptimally adherent (≥85.8% but <96.2%), and optimally adherent (≥96.2%), including perfectly adherent (100%). Persistence, ie, time until discontinuation, was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Reasons for discontinuation were recorded.

RESULTS

The cohort included 98 patients with relapsing MS, all of whom received a dedicated education session about their medication. Of these 80% were women, 31.6% had fingolimod as first DMT, and 68.4% had switched from other DMTs. The mean implementation rate over 2 years was 98.6% (IQR_1-3 98.51%-98.7%) and did not change significantly over time; 89% of measurements were in the optimally adherent category, 45.6% in the perfectly adherent category. There was one single occurrence of nonadherence. New users of DMTs were 1.29 times more likely to be adherent than experienced users (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.11-1.51; P<0.001), but not more persistent. Nineteen of 98 patients discontinued fingolimod.

CONCLUSION

The very high implementation rates displayed in this sample of MS patients suggest that facilitation by health care professionals in preserving adherence behavior may be sufficient for the majority of patients. Targeted interventions should focus on patients who are nonadherent or who stop treatment without intention to reinitiate.