1
|
Ahluwalia M, Ali MA, Joshi RS, Park ES, Taha B, McCutcheon I, Chiang V, Hong A, Sinclair G, Bartek J, Chen CC. An integrated disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scale for melanoma: contributions of KPS, CITV, number of metastases, and BRAF mutation status. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdaa152. [PMID: 33506199 PMCID: PMC7810198 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains a mainstay therapy in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases (BM). While prognostic scales have been developed for melanoma patients who underwent SRS treatment for BM, the pertinence of these scales in the context of molecularly targeted therapies remains unclear. Methods Through a multi-institutional collaboration, we collated the survival patterns of 331 melanoma BM patients with known BRAF mutation status treated with SRS. We established a prognostic scale that was validated in an independent cohort of 174 patients. All patients with BRAF mutations in this series were treated with BRAF inhibitors. Prognostic utility was assessed using Net Reclassification Index (NRI > 0) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) metrics. Results In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, BRAF mutation status, KPS, number of metastases, and cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV) independently contributed to survival prognostication for melanoma patients with SRS-treated BM (P < .05 for all variables). These variables were incorporated into a prognostic scale using the disease-specific graded prognostic assessment (ds-GPA) framework. This integrated melanoma ds-GPA scale was validated in 2 independent cohorts collated through a multi-institutional collaboration. In terms of order of prognostic importance, BRAF mutation status exerted the greatest influence on survival, while KPS, the number of metastases, and CITV exhibited comparable, lesser impacts. Conclusions Optimal survival prognostication for SRS-treated patients with melanoma BM requires an integrated assessment of patient characteristics (KPS), tumor characteristics (CITV and number of metastases), and the mutational profile of the melanoma (BRAF mutation status).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manmeet Ahluwalia
- Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Mir A Ali
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rushikesh S Joshi
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Eun Suk Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Birra Taha
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ian McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Angela Hong
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, NSW, Australia
| | - Georges Sinclair
- Department of Oncology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.,Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kancharla P, Ivanov A, Chan S, Ashamalla H, Huang RY, Yanagihara TK. The effect of brain metastasis location on clinical outcomes: A review of the literature. Neurooncol Adv 2019; 1:vdz017. [PMID: 32642653 PMCID: PMC7212918 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdz017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
It is common clinical practice to consider the location of a brain metastasis when making decisions regarding local therapies and, in some scenarios, estimating clinical outcomes, such as local disease control and patient survival. However, the location of a brain metastasis is not included in any validated prognostic nomogram and it is unclear if this is due to a lack of a relationship or a lack of support from published data. We performed a comprehensive review of the literature focusing on studies that have investigated a relationship between brain metastasis location and clinical outcomes, including patient survival. The vast majority of reports anatomically categorized brain metastases as supratentorial or infratentorial whereas some reports also considered other subdivisions of the brain, including different lobes or with particular areas defined as eloquent cortex. Results were variable across studies, with some finding a relationship between metastasis location and survival, but the majority finding either no relationship or a weak correlation that was not significant in the context of multivariable analysis. Here, we highlight the key findings and limitations of many studies, including how neurosurgical resection might influence the relative importance of metastasis location and in what ways future analyses may improve anatomical categorization and resection status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pragnan Kancharla
- Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Alexander Ivanov
- Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York.,Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Susie Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Hani Ashamalla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ted K Yanagihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rades D, Blanck O, Khoa MT, VAN Thai P, Hung NQ, Dziggel L, Schild SE. Validation of a Survival Score for Patients Receiving Radiosurgery or Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for 1 to 3 Brain Metastases. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 32:381-384. [PMID: 29475924 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2017] [Revised: 12/10/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM We developed a scoring system to predict 1-year survival after radiosurgery for 1-3 brain metastases. This study aimed to validate this system. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-six new patients were included in this validation study. Like in the original scoring-system, three factors (age, performance status, extra-cranial metastases) were used. For each factor, 1-year survival rates in % were divided by 10, and the three scoring-points were added for each patient. RESULTS Patient's scores were 10, 11, 13, 14, 16 or 17 points with 1-year survival rates ranging between 31% and 80%. Two groups, 10-14 and 16-17 points were formed. In the 14-16 points group, 1-year survival was 47% (versus 33% in the preceding study, p=0.060). In the 16-17 points group, 1-year survival rates were 75% versus 77% (p=0.79). CONCLUSION In the more favorable group, the scoring-system was very reproducible. In the less favorable group, the difference was larger, but also not signficant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany .,Faculty of Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Saphir Radiosurgery Center Northern Germany, Güstrow, Germany
| | - Mai Trong Khoa
- Faculty of Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.,Nuclear Medicine and Oncology Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Pham VAN Thai
- Nuclear Medicine and Oncology Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Quang Hung
- Nuclear Medicine and Oncology Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Liesa Dziggel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bilger A, Frenzel F, Oehlke O, Wiehle R, Milanovic D, Prokic V, Nieder C, Grosu AL. Local control and overall survival after frameless radiosurgery: A single center experience. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2017; 7:55-61. [PMID: 29594230 PMCID: PMC5862646 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2017.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Revised: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly advocated for 1-3 small brain metastases. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical results in patients with brain metastases treated with LINAC-based SRS using a thermoplastic mask (non-invasive fixation system) and Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT). Material and Methods In this single-institution study 48 patients with 77 brain metastases were treated between February 2012 and January 2014. The prescribed dose was 20 Gy or 18 Gy as a single fraction. SRS was performed with a True Beam STX Novalis Radiosurgery LINAC (Varian Medical Systems). The verification of positioning was done using the BrainLAB ExacTrac ® X-ray 6D system and cone-beam CT. Results In 69 of 77 treated brain metastases (90%) the follow-up was documented on MR imaging performed every 3 months. Mean follow-up time was 10.86 months. Estimated 1-year local control was 83%, using the Kaplan-Meier method. In 7/69 brain metastases (10%) local failure (LF) was diagnosed. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.73 months, largely due to distant brain relapse. A GTV of ≤2.0 cm3 was significantly associated with a better PFS than a GTV >2.0 cm3. Extracranial stable disease and GTV ≤2.5 cm³ were significant predictors of OS.We observed 2 cases of radiation necrosis diagnosed by histology after surgical resection. No other cases of severe side effects (CTACE ≥ 3) were observed. Conclusion LINAC-based frameless SRS with the BrainLAB Mask using the BrainLAB ExacTrac ® X-ray 6D system for patient positioning is well tolerated, safe and leads to favorable crude local control of 90%. In our experience, local control after frameless (ringless) SRS is as good as ring-based SRS reported in literature. Without invasive head fixation, radiotherapy is more comfortable for patients.
Collapse
Key Words
- Brain metastases
- CBCT, cone-beam CT
- CT, computed tomography
- CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0
- DC, distant intracranial tumor control
- DRR, digitally reconstructed radiographs
- GTV, Gross Tumor Volume
- IGRT, Image-Guided Radiotherapy
- LC, Local Control
- LINAC
- LINAC, Linear Accelerator
- OS, Overall Survival
- PFS, progression-free survival
- PTV, planning target volume
- RPA, recursive partitioning analysis
- Radiosurgery
- SRS, Stereotactic radiosurgery
- WBRT, Whole Brain Radiotherapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelika Bilger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str.3, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Florian Frenzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str.3, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Oehlke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str.3, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Wiehle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str.3, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dusan Milanovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str.3, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Vesna Prokic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str.3, Freiburg, Germany.,University of Applied Sciences Koblenz, Joseph-Rovan-Allee 2, 53424 Remagen, Germany
| | - Carsten Nieder
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, 8092 Bodø, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str.3, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McGranahan T, Nagpal S. A Neuro-oncologist's Perspective on Management of Brain Metastases in Patients with EGFR Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2017; 18:22. [PMID: 28391420 PMCID: PMC5385200 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-017-0466-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastasis (BrM) has been revolutionized by identification of molecular subsets that have targetable oncogenes. Historically, survival for NSCLC with symptomatic BrM was weeks to months. Now, many patients are surviving years with limited data to guide treatment decisions. Tumors with activating mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRact+) have a higher incidence of BrM, but a longer overall survival. The high response rate of both systemic and BrM EGFRact+ NSCLC to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has led to the rapid incorporation of new therapies but is outpacing evidence-based decisions for BrM in NSCLC. While whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) was the foundation of management of BrM, extended survival raises concerns for the subacute and late effects radiotherapy. We favor the use of TKIs and delaying the use of WBRT when able. At inevitable disease progression, we consider alternative dosing schedules to increase CNS penetration (such as pulse dosing of erlotinib) or advance to next generation TKI if available. We utilize local control options of surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for symptomatic accessible lesions based on size and edema. At progression despite available TKIs, we use pemetrexed-based platinum doublet chemotherapy or immunotherapy if the tumor has high expression of PDL-1. We reserve the use of WBRT for patients with more than 10 BrM and progression despite TKI and conventional chemotherapy, if performance status is appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tresa McGranahan
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| | - Seema Nagpal
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cohen-Inbar O, Sheehan JP. The role of stereotactic radiosurgery and whole brain radiation therapy as primary treatment in the treatment of patients with brain oligometastases - A systematic review. JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT 2016; 4:79-88. [PMID: 29296432 PMCID: PMC5658879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The management of patients presenting with a limited number of brain metastases (BM) (oligo-metastases, defined as less than 3 BM) has evolved from Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) alone to more aggressive strategies adding surgical resection and Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) to the armamentarium. In choosing treatment modalities, the relative importance of the patient's age and clinical parameters, the number or volume of BM and the potential treatment related adverse-effects has been a matter of much debate. For patients with oligometastatic BM, local therapy using SRS in addition to WBRT was shown to improve time to neurologic deterioration, relapse rate and Overall Survival (OS). In patients who receive local therapy (SRS or surgery), adjuvant WBRT was shown to improve regional (brain) relapse rate. In the contemporary era, the beneficial effect of WBRT on lengthening the time of neurologic independence or OS when compared to no further treatment is unclear. One Meta-analysis pooling of information from several reports concluded that for younger patients (<50 years), SRS alone favored survival and that the initial omission of WBRT did not impact distant brain relapse rates. Other recent reports demonstrated on the contrary an OS benefit, more pronounced in good prognosis patients (diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment 2.4-4.0) treated with SRS+WBRT compared to those who received SRS alone. As of today, there remains a role for both SRS and WBRT in the management of patients with oligo-metastatic BM but consensus about when to employ one or both is lacking. The exact patient selection criteria to benefit from either or both are still a matter of active research and heated debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Or Cohen-Inbar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
| | - Jason P. Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
| |
Collapse
|