1
|
Fendler A, de Vries EGE, GeurtsvanKessel CH, Haanen JB, Wörmann B, Turajlic S, von Lilienfeld-Toal M. COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer: immunogenicity, efficacy and safety. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:385-401. [PMID: 35277694 PMCID: PMC8916486 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00610-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Patients with cancer have a higher risk of severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and associated mortality than the general population. Owing to this increased risk, patients with cancer have been prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination globally, for both primary and booster vaccinations. However, given that these patients were not included in the pivotal clinical trials, considerable uncertainty remains regarding vaccine efficacy, and the extent of humoral and cellular immune responses in these patients, as well as the risks of vaccine-related adverse events. In this Review, we summarize the current knowledge generated in studies conducted since COVID-19 vaccines first became available. We also highlight critical points that might affect vaccine efficacy in patients with cancer in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Fendler
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - John B Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bernhard Wörmann
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Department of Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Samra Turajlic
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
- Research Group Infections in Haematology/Oncology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute, Jena, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suleiman N, Shamsudin SH, Mohd Rus R, Draman S. Cross-sectional Retrospective Study on Paracetamol Post Infants' Vaccination in Malaysia. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES 2020; 12:S696-S702. [PMID: 33828363 PMCID: PMC8021052 DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_255_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Practice of dispensing paracetamol (PCM) in post infants' vaccination remains debatable in Malaysia as the administration of PCM postvaccination in infants was found to cause the vaccine to be less effective, thus requiring appropriate regulation measures. OBJECTIVE This research aimed to investigate the prevalence of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with/without PCM to be prescribed post infants' vaccination in Malaysia (possible associated factors: age, types and stages of vaccination, concomitant vaccines and drugs, and/vitamins). MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from 2011 to 2017. The AEFI was extracted from Quests 2, 3, and 3+ System of National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency (NPRA). The population of vaccinated infants was obtained from the Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia official website. The AEFI data were further categorized into (i) AEFI with possibility for PCM to be prescribed, and (ii) AEFI with no possibility for PCM to be prescribed. The data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2013, Portland, USA simple and multiple logistic regression tests, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software programme, version 22.0 (IBM), New York, USA. RESULT Various AEFI cases (359 infants) were reported. DTaP/Hib/IPV and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) showed higher prevalence of AEFI with/without PCM to be prescribed post infants' vaccination cases per 100,000 population (2.07 and 2.21, respectively) than other types of vaccinations. DTaP/Hib/IPV (2 months) vaccination showed the highest value (3.00) among other age groups. Backward elimination presented DTaP/Hib/IPV (3-4 months) (95%CI; 0.231, 0.899%; P = 0.023) was the possible associated factor. Hepatitis B (1-5 months), DTaP/Hib/IPV (3-4 months), DTaP/Hib/IPV (5-12 months), concomitant vaccines as well as concomitant drugs and/ vitamins were the identified potential cofounders. CONCLUSION Prescribing and dispensing of PCM post infants' vaccination may be confined to DTaP/Hib/IPV (2-4 months) and 12 months MMR groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nurain Suleiman
- Pharmaceutical Services Division, Johor State Health Department, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kulliyyah of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Kuantan, Malaysia
| | - Siti Hadijah Shamsudin
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kulliyyah of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Kuantan, Malaysia
| | - Razman Mohd Rus
- Department of Community Medicine, Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Kuantan, Malaysia
| | - Shamsul Draman
- Department of Family Medicine, Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Kuantan, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bednarek A, Klepacz R. A Review of Recommendations for Routine Immunization Services During COVID-19 Pandemic That are Relevant for Nursing Personnel Involved in the Implementation of Immunoprophylaxis. J Multidiscip Healthc 2020; 13:1099-1105. [PMID: 33116556 PMCID: PMC7548331 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s271182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunization programmes are of key importance for maintaining good health and protecting life. Disruption to routine immunization may increase the incidence of diseases that can be prevented by vaccinations. The aim of this review is to present the current recommendations on immunization services during the COVID-19 pandemic that are relevant for the nursing practice. It contains an overview of recommended guidelines published in March and April 2020, and of scientific publications on immunizations for children and adults, taking into account recommendations related to the new epidemiological risk caused by SARS-CoV-2 infections. The ongoing global pandemic of COVID-19 calls for changes in the organization of health care and puts an additional burden on all resources forming the healthcare system. The COVID-19 pandemic poses a particular challenge to public health, as active immunoprophylaxis should make it possible to control other infectious diseases. Protection against the spread of SARS-CoV-2 may hamper routine immunization services, which must be administered with particular regard to epidemiological safety. Nurses have always had an important role to play in the implementation and promotion of vaccinations and in emphasizing their importance for public health. Therefore, it is crucial that they have up-to-date information on vaccinological interventions that reduce the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Bednarek
- Chair and Department of Paediatric Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
| | - Robert Klepacz
- Department of Clinical Pathomorphology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Suleiman N, Shamsuddin SH, Mohd Rus R, Drahman S, Taib MNAM. The Relevancy of paracetamol and Breastfeeding Post Infant Vaccination: A Systematic Review. PHARMACY 2018; 6:E27. [PMID: 29597245 PMCID: PMC6025262 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy6020027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 03/18/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Paracetamol may be used as an antipyretic agent for the treatment of fever, as well as an analgesic in the treatment of mild to moderate pain post-vaccination in infants. The use of paracetamol during fever may be or may not be recommended since it may alter the natural human body immune response, although it may reduce pain. Objectives: The aims of this study are to describe the effectiveness of breastfeeding in reducing pain and paracetamol in reducing fever and pain post infant vaccination. Methods: Data sources and study selection was conducted by electronic searching of six databases. Manual reference checks of all articles on paracetamol and breastfeeding post infant vaccination published in the English language between 1978 and 2017. Two levels of screening were used on 9614 citations, which include screening of abstracts and titles followed by full text screening. The data synthesis were tabulated into study characteristics, quality, and effects. Results: Systematic review of breastfeeding included three studies from 9614 database searches found significant benefit from breastfeeding in pain scores and the duration of crying, as well as behavioural changes. None of the studies stated the detriment of breastfeeding before, during, and after immunization. Systematic review of paracetamol effectiveness included four studies from 1177 database searches found significant benefit from prophylaxis paracetamol in fever, one study found significant benefit from prophylaxis paracetamol in fussiness, and one study's results were found to be not significant. Two studies on evaluating the safety of prophylactic paracetamol in 2009 found that antibody responses to several antigens were significantly reduced, and the other study in 1988 found that antibody titres to DTP bacteria of placebo and PCM did not differ significantly. Conclusions: The relevancy of giving paracetamol post all types of vaccination may be questionable. Breastfeeding before, during, and after immunization are recommended for pain reduction and are proven effective. Further research is required in deciding if paracetamol is to be of rational use following infant immunization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nurain Suleiman
- Johor Pharmaceutical Services Division, Ministry of Health of Malaysia, Kulliyyah of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan 25710, Pahang, Malaysia.
| | - Siti Hadijah Shamsuddin
- Kulliyyah of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan 25710, Pahang, Malaysia.
| | - Razman Mohd Rus
- Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan 25710, Pahang, Malaysia.
| | - Shamsul Drahman
- Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan 25710, Pahang, Malaysia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Walter EB, Hornik CP, Grohskopf L, McGee CE, Todd CA, Museru OI, Harrington L, Broder KR. The effect of antipyretics on immune response and fever following receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine in young children. Vaccine 2017; 35:6664-6671. [PMID: 29056422 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2017] [Revised: 10/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antipyretics reduce fever following childhood vaccinations; after inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) they might ameliorate fever and thereby decrease febrile seizure risk, but also possibly blunt the immune response. We assessed the effect of antipyretics on immune responses and fever following IIV in children ages 6 through 47 months. METHODS Over the course of three seasons, one hundred forty-two children, receiving either a single or the first of 2 recommended doses of IIV, were randomized to receive either oral acetaminophen suspension (n = 59) or placebo (n = 59) (double-blinded) or ibuprofen (n = 24) (open-label) immediately following IIV and every 4-8 h thereafter for 24 h. Blood samples were obtained at enrollment and 4 weeks following the last recommended IIV dose. Responses to IIV were assessed by hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI). Seroprotection was defined as an HAI titer ≥1:40 and seroconversion as a titer ≥1:40 if baseline titer <1:10 or four-fold rise if baseline titer ≥1:10. Participants were monitored for fever and other solicited symptoms on the day of and day following IIV. RESULTS Significant differences in seroconversion and post-vaccination seroprotection were not observed between children included in the different antipyretic groups and the placebo group for the vaccine antigens included in IIV over the course of the studies. Frequencies of solicited symptoms, including fever, were similar between treatment groups and the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS Significant blunting of the immune response was not observed when antipyretics were administered to young children receiving IIV. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to definitively establish the effect of antipyretics on IIV immunogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel B Walter
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Christoph P Hornik
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lisa Grohskopf
- Epidemiology and Prevention Branch, Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Charles E McGee
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christopher A Todd
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Oidda I Museru
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lynn Harrington
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Karen R Broder
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eden LM, Lind MG, Luthy KE, Macintosh JL. Best Practice for Prevention of Vaccination Common Problems With Antipyretic/Analgesic Medications. J Nurse Pract 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2017.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
7
|
Obando-Pacheco P, Rivero-Calle I, Gómez-Rial J, Rodríguez-Tenreiro Sánchez C, Martinón-Torres F. New perspectives for hexavalent vaccines. Vaccine 2017; 36:5485-5494. [PMID: 28676382 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2017] [Revised: 05/13/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
With the increase in the number of routine vaccinations the development of pentavalent and hexavalent combination vaccines fitting the routine vaccination schedules became a necessity. In this respect, Europe has taken the lead in comparison with other world regions, and routine vaccination with pentavalent and hexavalent combinations including DTPa, Hib, HepB and IPV has been on European vaccination programs for >15years. Since the marketing authorization of Hexavac® and Infanrix Hexa® in 2000, immunization schedules in most European countries have included hexavalent vaccines. In the last years, two new hexavalent vaccines have been licensed and commercialized worldwide. This paper presents a review of the pharmaceutical profiles of the three hexavalent vaccines currently available. In addition, we aim to review safety, co-administration, tolerability and other practical concerns of their use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Obando-Pacheco
- Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain; GENVIP Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
| | - Irene Rivero-Calle
- Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain; GENVIP Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
| | - José Gómez-Rial
- Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain; GENVIP Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
| | - Carmen Rodríguez-Tenreiro Sánchez
- Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain; GENVIP Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
| | - Federico Martinón-Torres
- Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain; GENVIP Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wysocki J, Center KJ, Brzostek J, Majda-Stanislawska E, Szymanski H, Szenborn L, Czajka H, Hasiec B, Dziduch J, Jackowska T, Witor A, Kopińska E, Konior R, Giardina PC, Sundaraiyer V, Patterson S, Gruber WC, Scott DA, Gurtman A. A randomized study of fever prophylaxis and the immunogenicity of routine pediatric vaccinations. Vaccine 2017; 35:1926-1935. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.02.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2016] [Revised: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
9
|
Falup-Pecurariu O, Man SC, Neamtu ML, Chicin G, Baciu G, Pitic C, Cara AC, Neculau AE, Burlea M, Brinza IL, Schnell CN, Sas V, Lupu VV, François N, Swinnen K, Borys D. Effects of prophylactic ibuprofen and paracetamol administration on the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugated vaccine (PHiD-CV) co-administered with DTPa-combined vaccines in children: An open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017; 13:649-660. [PMID: 27541270 PMCID: PMC5360152 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1223001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2016] [Revised: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Prophylactic paracetamol administration impacts vaccine immune response; this study ( www.clinicaltrials.gov : NCT01235949) is the first to assess PHiD-CV immunogenicity following prophylactic ibuprofen administration. In this phase IV, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study in Romania (November 2010-December 2012), healthy infants were randomized 3:3:3:1:1:1 to prophylactically receive immediate, delayed or no ibuprofen (IIBU, DIBU, NIBU) or paracetamol (IPARA, DPARA, NPARA) after each of 3 primary doses (PHiD-CV at age 3/4/5 months co-administered with DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib at 3/5 and DTPa-IPV/Hib at 4 months) or booster dose (PHiD-CV and DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib; 12-15 months). Non-inferiority of immune response one month post-primary vaccination in terms of percentage of infants with anti-pneumococcal antibody concentrations ≥0.2 µg/mL (primary objective) was demonstrated if the upper limit (UL) of the 98.25% confidence interval of difference between groups (NIBU vs IIBU, NIBU vs DIBU) was <10% for ≥7/10 serotypes. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity/safety were evaluated, including confirmatory analysis of difference in fever incidences post-primary vaccination in IBU or DIBU group compared to NIBU. Of 850 infants randomized, 812 were included in the total vaccinated cohort. Non-inferiority was demonstrated for both comparisons (UL was <10% for 9/10 vaccine serotypes; exceptions: 6B [NIBU], 23F [IIBU]). However, fever incidence post-primary vaccination in the IIBU and DIBU groups did not indicate a statistically significant reduction. Prophylactic administration (immediate or delayed) of paracetamol decreased fever incidence but seemed to reduce immune response to PHiD-CV, except when given only at booster. Twenty-seven serious adverse events were reported for 15 children; all resolved and were not vaccination-related.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oana Falup-Pecurariu
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Clinic Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania
| | - Sorin C. Man
- Mother and Child Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu,” Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Mihai L. Neamtu
- Pediatric Clinic, Pediatric Clinic Hospital Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania
- Medical Department, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania
| | - Gratiana Chicin
- Preventive Medicine Department, Prophylaxis Center, Timisoara, Romania
| | - Ginel Baciu
- Department of Pediatrics, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Galati, Romania
- Saint Andrew Children Hospital Galati, Galati, Romania
| | - Carmen Pitic
- General Practitioner, Private Practice, Galati, Romania
| | | | - Andrea E. Neculau
- Fundamental and Prophylactic Sciences Department, Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania
| | - Marin Burlea
- Department of Pediatrics, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
| | | | - Cristina N. Schnell
- Third Pediatric Clinic, Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Valentina Sas
- Third Pediatric Clinic, Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Valeriu V. Lupu
- Department of Pediatrics, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chiappini E, Venturini E, Remaschi G, Principi N, Longhi R, Tovo PA, Becherucci P, Bonsignori F, Esposito S, Festini F, Galli L, Lucchesi B, Mugelli A, Marseglia GL, de Martino M. 2016 Update of the Italian Pediatric Society Guidelines for Management of Fever in Children. J Pediatr 2017; 180:177-183.e1. [PMID: 27810155 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2016] [Revised: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review new scientific evidence to update the Italian guidelines for managing fever in children as drafted by the panel of the Italian Pediatric Society. STUDY DESIGN Relevant publications in English and Italian were identified through search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from May 2012 to November 2015. RESULTS Previous recommendations are substantially reaffirmed. Antipyretics should be administered with the purpose to control the child's discomfort. Antipyretics should be administered orally; rectal administration is discouraged except in the setting of vomiting. Combined use of paracetamol and ibuprofen is discouraged, considering risk and benefit. Antipyretics are not recommended preemptively to reduce the incidence of fever and local reactions in children undergoing vaccination, or in attempt to prevent febrile convulsions in children. Ibuprofen and paracetamol are not contraindicated in children who are febrile with asthma, with the exception of known cases of paracetamol- or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced asthma. CONCLUSIONS Recent medical literature leads to reaffirmation of previous recommendations for use of antipyretics in children who are febrile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Chiappini
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| | - Elisabetta Venturini
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Remaschi
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Nicola Principi
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Longhi
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Pier-Angelo Tovo
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Becherucci
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Bonsignori
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Susanna Esposito
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Filippo Festini
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Luisa Galli
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Bice Lucchesi
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mugelli
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Gian Luigi Marseglia
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Maurizio de Martino
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | -
- Department of Science Health, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Affiliation(s)
- Juanita K Hodax
- Department of Pediatrics, Hasbro Children's Hospital and Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Michael P Koster
- Department of Pediatrics, Hasbro Children's Hospital and Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Das RR, Panigrahi I, Naik SS. The effect of prophylactic antipyretic administration on post-vaccination adverse reactions and antibody response in children: a systematic review. PLoS One 2014; 9:e106629. [PMID: 25180516 PMCID: PMC4152293 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 08/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prophylactic antipyretic administration decreases the post-vaccination adverse reactions. Recent study finds that they may also decrease the antibody responses to several vaccine antigens. This systematic review aimed to assess the evidence for a relationship between prophylactic antipyretic administration, post-vaccination adverse events, and antibody response in children. Methods A systematic search of major databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE was carried out till March 2014. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic antipyretic treatment versus placebo post-vaccination in children ≤6 years of age were included. Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed the studies for methodological quality, and extracted data [PROSPERO registration: CRD42014009717]. Results Of 2579 citations retrieved, a total of 13 RCTs including 5077 children were included in the review. Prophylactic antipyretic administration significantly reduced the febrile reactions (≥38.0°C) after primary and booster vaccinations. Though there were statistically significant differences in the antibody responses between the two groups, the prophylactic PCM group had what would be considered protective levels of antibodies to all of the antigens given after the primary and booster vaccinations. No significant difference in the nasopharyngeal carriage rates (short-term and long-term) of H. influenzae or S. pneumoniae serotypes was found between the prophylactic and no prophylactic PCM group. There was a significant reduction in the local and systemic symptoms after primary, but not booster vaccinations. Conclusions Though prophylactic antipyretic administration leads to relief of the local and systemic symptoms after primary vaccinations, there is a reduction in antibody responses to some vaccine antigens without any effect on the nasopharyngeal carriage rates of S. pneumoniae & H. influenza serotypes. Future trials and surveillance programs should also aim at assessing the effectiveness of programs where prophylactic administration of PCM is given. The timing of administration of antipyretics should be discussed with the parents after explaining the benefits & risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashmi Ranjan Das
- Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Inusha Panigrahi
- Department of Pediatrics, Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sushree Samiksha Naik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Afolabi MO, Adetifa JU, Imoukhuede EB, Viebig NK, Kampmann B, Bojang K. Early phase clinical trials with human immunodeficiency virus-1 and malaria vectored vaccines in The Gambia: frontline challenges in study design and implementation. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2014; 90:908-14. [PMID: 24615122 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) and malaria are among the most important infectious diseases in developing countries. Existing control strategies are unlikely to curtail these diseases in the absence of efficacious vaccines. Testing of HIV and malaria vaccines candidates start with early phase trials that are increasingly being conducted in developing countries where the burden of the diseases is high. Unique challenges, which affect planning and implementation of vaccine trials according to internationally accepted standards have thus been identified. In this review, we highlight specific challenges encountered during two early phase trials of novel HIV-1 and malaria vectored vaccine candidates conducted in The Gambia and how some of these issues were pragmatically addressed. We hope our experience will be useful for key study personnel involved in day-to-day running of similar clinical trials. It may also guide future design and implementation of vaccine trials in resource-constrained settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammed O Afolabi
- Vaccinology Theme, Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia; The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; European Vaccine Initiative, Germany; Disease Control and Elimination Theme, Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|