1
|
Sinai D, Lassri D, Spira C, Lipsitz JD. Telephone interpersonal counseling treatment for frequent attenders to primary care: Development and piloting. Psychother Res 2024; 34:555-569. [PMID: 37079921 DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2023.2200982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frequent attenders in primary care (FAs) consume a disproportionate amount of healthcare resources and often have depression, anxiety, chronic health issues, and interpersonal problems. Despite extensive medical care, they remain dissatisfied with the care and report no improvement in quality of life. OBJECTIVE To pilot a Telephone-based Interpersonal Counseling intervention for Frequent Attenders (TIPC-FA) and assess its feasibility and efficacy in reducing symptoms and healthcare utilization. METHOD Top 10% of primary care visitors were randomly assigned to TIPC-FA, Telephone Supportive Contact (Support), or Treatment as Usual (TAU). TIPC-FA and Support groups received six telephone sessions over twelve weeks, while the TAU group was interviewed twice. Multilevel regression tested for changes over time, considering patient and counselor variance. RESULTS TIPC-FA and Support groups demonstrated reduced depressive symptoms, and the TIPC-FA group showed decreased somatization and anxiety. The TIPC-FA group demonstrated a trend towards less healthcare utilization than the TAU group. CONCLUSION This pilot study suggests that IPC via telephone outreach is a feasible approach to treating FAs, achieving a reduction in symptoms not seen in other groups. Promising reduction in healthcare utilization in the TIPC-FA group warrants further exploration in larger-scale trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Sinai
- Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev., Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Dana Lassri
- The Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL (University College London), London, UK
| | | | - Joshua D Lipsitz
- Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev., Beer-Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caselli I, Ielmini M, Bellini A, Zizolfi D, Callegari C. Efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) in depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2023; 325:169-176. [PMID: 36623570 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Depression is one of the leading diseases globally. It can severely interfere with daily and occupational functioning of people affected. Both pharmacological interventions and psychotherapy are used for adult depression. The aim of the review is to evaluate the efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) by comparing STPP with different types of interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review with meta-analysis on the efficacy of STPP in depressive disorders was performed. RESULTS Meta-analysis findings confirm the superiority of STPP versus no interventions. The average effect size of depressive symptoms severity at the end of the treatment is -0.91 (95% CI: -1.49 - -0.33) in favor of STPP, while for clinical improvement of depressive symptoms is -0.78 (95% CI: -1.56 - 0.01). Results confirm a clear superiority of STPP to usual treatments unstructured. A mild superiority of efficacy of STPP on support psychotherapy emerged. Comparison of the efficacy of STPP vs cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy (CBT) shows little superior in case of STPP. No substantial differences in efficacy in case of STPP than control interventions emerged. Antidepressant therapy is resulted to be slightly more effective to STPP. DISCUSSION While all the other results confirm current literature, this review shows no superiority of combined treatment than STPP only. LIMITATIONS The review has some limitations such as the lack of moderation analysis and the high heterogenicity of the type of the studies. CONCLUSIONS The results confirm the efficacy of STPP in depressive disorders and endorse the guidelines of National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivano Caselli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Psychiatry, University of Insubria, Varese, VA, Italy
| | - Marta Ielmini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Psychiatry, University of Insubria, Varese, VA, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bellini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pavia, Pavia, PA, Italy
| | - Daniele Zizolfi
- Viarnetto psychiatric clinic, Pregassona-Lugano, TI, Switzerland
| | - Camilla Callegari
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Psychiatry, University of Insubria, Varese, VA, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Buckman JEJ, Saunders R, Stott J, Arundell LL, O'Driscoll C, Davies MR, Eley TC, Hollon SD, Kendrick T, Ambler G, Cohen ZD, Watkins E, Gilbody S, Wiles N, Kessler D, Richards D, Brabyn S, Littlewood E, DeRubeis RJ, Lewis G, Pilling S. Role of age, gender and marital status in prognosis for adults with depression: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2021; 30:e42. [PMID: 34085616 PMCID: PMC7610920 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796021000342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To determine whether age, gender and marital status are associated with prognosis for adults with depression who sought treatment in primary care. METHODS Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to 1st December 2020 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults seeking treatment for depression from their general practitioners, that used the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule so that there was uniformity in the measurement of clinical prognostic factors, and that reported on age, gender and marital status. Individual participant data were gathered from all nine eligible RCTs (N = 4864). Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to ascertain the independent association between: (i) age, (ii) gender and (iii) marital status, and depressive symptoms at 3-4, 6-8, and 9-12 months post-baseline and remission at 3-4 months. Risk of bias was evaluated using QUIPS and quality was assessed using GRADE. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019129512. Pre-registered protocol https://osf.io/e5zup/. RESULTS There was no evidence of an association between age and prognosis before or after adjusting for depressive 'disorder characteristics' that are associated with prognosis (symptom severity, durations of depression and anxiety, comorbid panic disorderand a history of antidepressant treatment). Difference in mean depressive symptom score at 3-4 months post-baseline per-5-year increase in age = 0(95% CI: -0.02 to 0.02). There was no evidence for a difference in prognoses for men and women at 3-4 months or 9-12 months post-baseline, but men had worse prognoses at 6-8 months (percentage difference in depressive symptoms for men compared to women: 15.08% (95% CI: 4.82 to 26.35)). However, this was largely driven by a single study that contributed data at 6-8 months and not the other time points. Further, there was little evidence for an association after adjusting for depressive 'disorder characteristics' and employment status (12.23% (-1.69 to 28.12)). Participants that were either single (percentage difference in depressive symptoms for single participants: 9.25% (95% CI: 2.78 to 16.13) or no longer married (8.02% (95% CI: 1.31 to 15.18)) had worse prognoses than those that were married, even after adjusting for depressive 'disorder characteristics' and all available confounders. CONCLUSION Clinicians and researchers will continue to routinely record age and gender, but despite their importance for incidence and prevalence of depression, they appear to offer little information regarding prognosis. Patients that are single or no longer married may be expected to have slightly worse prognoses than those that are married. Ensuring this is recorded routinely alongside depressive 'disorder characteristics' in clinic may be important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. E. J. Buckman
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
- iCope – Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, LondonNW1 0PE, UK
| | - R. Saunders
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - J. Stott
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - L.-L. Arundell
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - C. O'Driscoll
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - M. R. Davies
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, LondonSE5 8AF, UK
| | - T. C. Eley
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, LondonSE5 8AF, UK
| | - S. D. Hollon
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN37240, USA
| | - T. Kendrick
- Faculty of Medicine, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, SouthamptonSO16 5ST, UK
| | - G. Ambler
- Statistical Science, University College London, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Z. D. Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - E. Watkins
- Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, ExeterEX4 4QG, UK
| | - S. Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, YorkYO10 5DD, UK
| | - N. Wiles
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, BristolBS8 2BN, UK
| | - D. Kessler
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - D. Richards
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine and Health, ExeterEX1 2LU, UK
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien 28, 5063Bergen, Norway
| | - S. Brabyn
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, YorkYO10 5DD, UK
| | - E. Littlewood
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, YorkYO10 5DD, UK
| | - R. J. DeRubeis
- Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, 425 S. University Avenue, PhiladelphiaPA, 19104-60185, USA
| | - G. Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, LondonW1T 7NF, UK
| | - S. Pilling
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
- Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, 4 St Pancras Way, LondonNW1 0PE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) is an affect- and relationally focused, time-limited treatment supported by research spanning >4 decades. IPT focuses on stressful interpersonal experiences of loss, life changes, disputes, and social isolation. It emphasizes the role of relationships in recovery. This scoping review describes, within a historical perspective, IPT's evolution as an evidence-supported treatment of psychiatric disorders. METHODS English-language publications (n = 1119) identified via EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases (1974-2017), augmented with manual reference searches, were coded for clinical focus, population demographics, format, setting, publication type, and research type. Quantitative and qualitative analyses identified IPT publications' characteristics and trends over four epochs of psychotherapy research. RESULTS IPT literature primarily focused on depression (n = 772 articles; 69%), eating disorders (n = 135; 12%), anxiety disorders (n = 68; 6%), and bipolar disorder (n = 44; 4%), with rising publication rates and numbers of well-conducted randomized, controlled trials over time, justifying inclusion in consensus treatment guidelines. Research trends shifted from efficacy trials to effectiveness studies and population-based dissemination initiatives. Process research examined correlates of improvement and efficacy moderators. Innovations included global initiatives, prevention trials, and digital, web-based training and treatment. CONCLUSION Sparked by clinical innovations and scientific advances, IPT has evolved as an effective treatment of psychiatric disorders across the lifespan for diverse patients, including underserved clinical populations. Future research to elucidate mechanisms of change, improve access, and adapt to changing frameworks of psychopathology and treatment planning is needed. IPT addresses the universal centrality of relationships to mental health, which is as relevant today as it was over 40 years ago.
Collapse
|
5
|
Parhiala P, Ranta K, Gergov V, Kontunen J, Law R, La Greca AM, Torppa M, Marttunen M. Interpersonal Counseling in the Treatment of Adolescent Depression: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness and Feasibility Study in School Health and Welfare Services. SCHOOL MENTAL HEALTH 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s12310-019-09346-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
AbstractIn order to offer early and accessible treatment for adolescents with depression, brief and effective treatments in adolescents’ everyday surroundings are needed. This randomized controlled trial studied the preliminary effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of interpersonal counseling (IPC) and brief psychosocial support (BPS) in school health and welfare services. The study was conducted in the 28 lower secondary schools of a large city in Southern Finland, randomized to provide either IPC or BPS. Help-seeking 12–16-year-old adolescents with mild-to-moderate depression, with and without comorbid anxiety, were included in the study. Fifty-five adolescents received either 6 weekly sessions of IPC or BPS and two follow-up sessions. Outcome measures included self- and clinician-rated measures of depression, global functioning, and psychological distress/well-being. To assess feasibility and acceptability of the treatments, adolescents’ and counselors’ treatment compliance and satisfaction with treatment were assessed. Both treatments were effective in reducing depressive disorders and improving adolescents’ overall functioning and well-being. At post-treatment, in both groups, over 50% of adolescents achieved recovery based on self-report and over 70% based on observer report. Effect sizes for change were medium or large in both groups at post-treatment and increased at 6-month follow-up. A trend indicating greater baseline symptom severity among adolescents treated in the IPC-providing schools was observed. Adolescents and counselors in both groups were satisfied with the treatment, and 89% of the adolescents completed the treatments and follow-ups. This trial suggests that both IPC and BPS are feasible, acceptable, and effective treatments for mild-to-moderate depression in the school setting. In addition, IPC seems effective even if comorbid anxiety exists. Our study shows that brief, structured interventions, such as IPC and BPS, are beneficial in treating mild-to-moderate depression in school settings and can be administered by professionals working at school.Trial registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03001245.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kontunen J, Weiste E, Liukkonen T, Timonen M, Aaltonen J. Predicting response to interpersonal counselling (IPC) from case formulation: a systematic comparison between recovered and unchanged depressive cases. COUNSELLING PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/09515070.2019.1588101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jarmo Kontunen
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Elina Weiste
- Department of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Timo Liukkonen
- Centre for Life Course Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Markku Timonen
- Centre for Life Course Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Jukka Aaltonen
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lu DY, Zhu PP, Wu HY, Xu B, Lu TR. RETRACTED: Human Suicide, Modern Diagnosis Assistance and Magic Bullet Discovery. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem 2019; 19:15-23. [PMID: 30644350 DOI: 10.2174/1871524919666190115130655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Revised: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The article entitled “Human Suicide, Modern Diagnosis Assistance and Magic Bullet Discovery”, by Da-Yong Lu, Peng- Peng Zhu, Hong-Ying Wu, Nagendra Sastry Yarla, Bin Xu, Jian Ding, Ajit Varki and Ting-Ren Lu, has been retracted on the request of the co-authors, Dr. Ajit Varki, Dr. Nagendra Sastry Yarla and Dr. Jian Ding available at: Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem 2019; 19(1): 15-23. http://www.eurekaselect.com/169003/article. The Corresponding Author Dr. Da-Yong Lu has included the names of the co-authors, Dr. Ajit Varki, Dr. Nagendra Sastry Yarla and Dr. Jian Ding without their consent and the manuscript has been published in the journal, Central Nervous System Agents in Medicinal Chemistry (CNSAMC). Kindly see Bentham Science Policy on Article retraction at the link given below: (https://benthamscience.com/journals/central-nervous-system-agents-in-medicinal-chemistry/author-guidelines/) Submission of a manuscript to the respective journals implies that all authors have read and agreed to the content of the Copyright Letter or the Terms and Conditions. As such, this article represents a severe abuse of the scientific publishing system. Bentham Science Publishers takes a very strong view on this matter and apologizes to the readers of the journal for any inconvenience this may cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Da-Yong Lu
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, P.R. China
| | | | - Hong-Ying Wu
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, P.R. China
| | - Bin Xu
- Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Shi, P.R. China
| | - Ting-Ren Lu
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Task shifting approaches (rational redistribution of tasks among health workforce teams) to train lay professionals to assist with integrating mental health treatment in primary care has been recommended to close the mental health treatment gap for depression in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to examine the a new model for depression care in a low-resource environment compared to enhanced treatment at usual (E-TAU). METHODS We trained non-specialist community health workers (local lay employees of the public health system) to provide Interpersonal Counseling (IPC) to treat depressive symptoms in the Brazilian, São Paulo city, family health strategy (FHS). We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 86 patients with a current major depressive disorder or dysthymia (based on DSM-IV) recruited from an FHS clinic. Participants were randomized to IPC intervention (n = 43) or E-TAU (n = 43). Participants allocated to IPC received 3-4 sessions provided by community health workers; research psychologists followed the E-TAU participants to facilitate their referral to specialized mental health care within the public system. Reduction of depressive symptoms was assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale (HDRS-17) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); minor psychiatric symptomatology (including depression, anxiety and somatoform symptoms) were measured using the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ); and functioning was measured by the Clinical Global Impression Scale over a 2-month period. RESULTS Intention-to-treat analysis showed significant improvement on symptoms for both groups over 2 months, without significant differences between them. Per-protocol analysis showed significant better HDRS-17 outcomes for the IPC group. CONCLUSIONS Training non-specialist community health workers in low- and middle-income countries to provide IPC could be a successful strategy in reducing the burden of depression and also potentially a low-cost and effective alternative to specialist-led services that might not be possible in low income settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Brazilian Clinical Trials, number RBR-5qhmb5 (trial url: http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-5qhmb5/) , retrospectively registered after May 1, 2013.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kontunen J, Timonen M, Muotka J, Liukkonen T. Is interpersonal counselling (IPC) sufficient treatment for depression in primary care patients? A pilot study comparing IPC and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT). J Affect Disord 2016; 189:89-93. [PMID: 26432031 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2015] [Revised: 08/26/2015] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychotherapeutic treatment is underused in primary care, where even short-term psychotherapy can be perceived as too lengthy and labour-intensive. We tested here for the first time the preliminary efficacy of seven sessions of interpersonal counselling (IPC) by comparison with sixteen sessions of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) in regular clinical settings. METHODS Patients seeking treatment for the first time who met the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD, mild/moderate) were randomized to either IPC (n=20) or IPT (n=20). The efficacy of the treatments was assessed using the 34-item Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-OM) scale and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scale. RESULTS 90% of the patients completed all the treatment sessions. IPC delivered by psychiatric nurses in primary care proved equally as effective as IPT delivered by psychotherapists/psychologists in secondary care. The pre-treatment to 12-month follow-up within-group effect sizes were large: 1.52 (CORE-OM) and 1.41 (BDI) in the IPC group and 1.58 (CORE-OM) and 1.40 (BDI) in the IPT group. At the 12-month follow-up 59% of the patients in the IPC group and 63% in the IPT group were classified as recovered on the CORE-OM scale, with corresponding remission rates of 61% for both groups on the BDI scale. LIMITATIONS The small sample size limited the power to detect differences between the groups and the naturalistic settings may have confounded the results. CONCLUSIONS This clinical trial suggests that IPC is an appropriate and even sufficient first-phase intervention for handling previously untreated mild to moderate depression in primary health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarmo Kontunen
- Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
| | - Markku Timonen
- Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oulu, Finland
| | - Joona Muotka
- Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Timo Liukkonen
- Department of Psychiatry, Savonlinna Central Hospital, and Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Matsumoto Y, Fabbri C, Pellegrini S, Porcelli S, Politi P, Bellino S, Iofrida C, Mariotti V, Melissari E, Menchetti M, Martinelli V, Cappucciati M, Bozzatello P, Brignolo E, Brambilla P, Balestrieri M, Serretti A. Serotonin transporter gene: a new polymorphism may affect response to antidepressant treatments in major depressive disorder. Mol Diagn Ther 2015; 18:567-77. [PMID: 24958631 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-014-0110-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Several gene variants have been related to major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment outcomes; however, few studies have investigated a possible different effect on pharmacotherapy and brief psychotherapy response. METHODS A total of 137 MDD patients were randomized to either interpersonal counseling (IPC; n = 40) or antidepressant pharmacological treatment (n = 97). Outcomes were remission, response, and symptom improvement at week 8. Five genetic variants were investigated (5HTR2A rs6314, BDNF rs6265, SLC6A4 rs8076005, CREB1 rs2253206, and TPH2 rs11179023) as possible modulators of outcomes. RESULTS The LC6A4 rs8076005 AA genotype and A allele were associated with response rate in the antidepressant group (p = 0.015 and 0.005, respectively) and in the whole sample (p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively). In the IPC group a non-significant trend in the same direction was observed. The TPH2 rs11179023 A allele showed a marginal association with symptom improvement in the IPC group only. Other gene variants did not impact on outcomes in any treatment group. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that rs8076005 in the SLC6A4 gene may be a modulator of antidepressant response, especially when pharmacological treatment is used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiko Matsumoto
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Carlo Pepoli 5, 40123, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Weissman MM, Hankerson SH, Scorza P, Olfson M, Verdeli H, Shea S, Lantigua R, Wainberg M. Interpersonal Counseling (IPC) for Depression in Primary Care. Am J Psychother 2014; 68:359-83. [PMID: 26453343 DOI: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2014.68.4.359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Interpersonal Counseling (IPC) comes directly from interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), an evidenced-based psychotherapy developed by Klerman and Weissman. It [IPC?] is a briefer, more structured version for use primarily in non-mental health settings, such as primary care clinics when treating patients with symptoms of depression. National health-care reform, which will bring previously uninsured persons into care and provide mechanisms to support mental health training of primary care providers, will increase interest in briefer psychotherapy. This paper describes the rationale, development, evidence for efficacy, and basic structure of IPC and also presents an illustrated clinical vignette. The evidence suggests that IPC is efficacious in reducing symptoms of depression; that it can be used by mental health personnel of different levels of training, and that the number of sessions is flexible depending on the context and resources. More clinical trials are needed, especially ones comparing IPC to other types of care used in the delivery of mental health services in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrna M Weissman
- Division of Epidemiology at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Menchetti M, Rucci P, Bortolotti B, Bombi A, Scocco P, Kraemer HC, Berardi D. Moderators of remission with interpersonal counselling or drug treatment in primary care patients with depression: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2014; 204:144-50. [PMID: 24311553 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.122663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite depressive disorders being very common there has been little research to guide primary care physicians on the choice of treatment for patients with mild to moderate depression. AIMS To evaluate the efficacy of interpersonal counselling compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), in primary care attenders with major depression and to identify moderators of treatment outcome. METHOD A randomised controlled trial in nine centres (DEPICS, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number: ACTRN12608000479303). The primary outcome was remission of the depressive episode (defined as a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score ≤7 at 2 months). Daily functioning was assessed using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale. Logistic regression models were used to identify moderators of treatment outcome. RESULTS The percentage of patients who achieved remission at 2 months was significantly higher in the interpersonal counselling group compared with the SSRI group (58.7% v. 45.1%, P = 0.021). Five moderators of treatment outcome were found: depression severity, functional impairment, anxiety comorbidity, previous depressive episodes and smoking habit. CONCLUSIONS We identified some patient characteristics predicting a differential outcome with pharmacological and psychological interventions. Should our results be confirmed in future studies, these characteristics will help clinicians to define criteria for first-line treatment of depression targeted to patients' characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Menchetti
- Marco Menchetti, MD, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Paola Rucci, PhD, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Biancamaria Bortolotti, MD, PhD, Annarosa Bombi, MD, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Paolo Scocco, MD, Mental Health Department, Local Social and Health Unit, Padova, Italy; Helena Chmura Kraemer, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA; Domenico Berardi, MD, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lipsitz JD, Markowitz JC. Mechanisms of change in interpersonal therapy (IPT). Clin Psychol Rev 2013; 33:1134-47. [PMID: 24100081 PMCID: PMC4109031 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2012] [Revised: 09/03/2013] [Accepted: 09/17/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Although interpersonal therapy (IPT) has demonstrated efficacy for mood and other disorders, little is known about how IPT works. We present interpersonal change mechanisms that we hypothesize account for symptom change in IPT. Integrating relational theory and insights based on research findings regarding stress, social support, and illness, IPT highlights contextual factors thought to precipitate and maintain psychiatric disorders. It frames therapy around a central interpersonal problem in the patient's life, a current crisis or relational predicament that is disrupting social support and increasing interpersonal stress. By mobilizing and working collaboratively with the patient to resolve this problem, IPT seeks to activate several interpersonal change mechanisms. These include: 1) enhancing social support, 2) decreasing interpersonal stress, 3) facilitating emotional processing, and 4) improving interpersonal skills. We hope that articulating these mechanisms will help therapists to formulate cases and better maintain focus within an IPT framework. Here we propose interpersonal mechanisms that might explain how IPT's interpersonal focus leads to symptom change. Future work needs to specify and test candidate mediators in clinical trials. We anticipate that pursuing this more systematic strategy will lead to important refinements and improvements in IPT and enhance its application in a range of clinical populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Lipsitz
- Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Marcus Family Campus, Beer-Sheva, Israel; Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Serretti A, Fabbri C, Pellegrini S, Porcelli S, Politi P, Bellino S, Menchetti M, Mariotti V, Demi C, Martinelli V, Cappucciati M, Bozzatello P, Brignolo E, Brambilla P, Pae CU, Balestrieri M, De Ronchi D. No effect of serotoninergic gene variants on response to interpersonal counseling and antidepressants in major depression. Psychiatry Investig 2013; 10:180-9. [PMID: 23798967 PMCID: PMC3687053 DOI: 10.4306/pi.2013.10.2.180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2012] [Revised: 10/22/2012] [Accepted: 11/06/2012] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gene variants within the serotonin pathway have been associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment outcomes, however a possible different modulation on pharmacological or psychological treatments has never been investigated. METHODS One hundred sixty MDD patients were partially randomized to either inter-personal counseling (IPC) or antidepressants. The primary outcome was remission at week 8. Five serotonergic polymorphisms were investigated (COMT rs4680, HTR1A rs6295, HTR2A rs2224721, HTR2A rs7997012 and SLC6A4 rs421417). RESULTS IPC (n=43) and antidepressant (n=117) treated patients did not show any difference in remission rates at week 8 (corrected for baseline severity, age and center). None of the studied gene variants impacted on response and remission rates at week 8 neither in the IPC nor in the antidepressant group. An analysis of the whole sample showed a trend of association between rs7997012 AA genotype and a better treatment outcome. CONCLUSION Our study confirms that IPC is an effective psychological intervention comparable to antidepressants in mild-moderate MDD. Polymorphisms related to the serotonin system did not exert a major effect on clinical outcomes in none of the treatment groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Serretti
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Chiara Fabbri
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvia Pellegrini
- Department of Experimental Pathology, Medical Biotechnology, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefano Porcelli
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Politi
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Marco Menchetti
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Veronica Mariotti
- Department of Experimental Pathology, Medical Biotechnology, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Cristina Demi
- Department of Experimental Pathology, Medical Biotechnology, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Valentina Martinelli
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Cappucciati
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | - Paolo Brambilla
- Inter-University Centre for Behavioural Neurosciences (ICBN), University of Verona, Verona and DPMSC, Section of Psychiatry, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Chi-Un Pae
- Department of Psychiatry, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matteo Balestrieri
- Inter-University Centre for Behavioural Neurosciences (ICBN), University of Verona, Verona and DPMSC, Section of Psychiatry, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Diana De Ronchi
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Carta M, Petretto D, Adamo S, Bhat K, Lecca M, Mura G, Carta V, Angermeyer M, Moro M. Counseling in primary care improves depression and quality of life. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 2012; 8:152-7. [PMID: 23173011 PMCID: PMC3502887 DOI: 10.2174/1745017901208010152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2012] [Revised: 05/14/2012] [Accepted: 03/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: To measure the effectiveness on Quality of Life of adjunctive cognitive behavioral counseling in the setting of General Practitioners (GPs) along with the treatment as usual (TAU;) for the treatment of depression. Methods: Six month-controlled trial of patients who were referred to randomly assigned GPs (four for experimental group of patients and ten for the control) was done. Experimental sample had 34 patients with DSM-IV diagnosis of Depression (Depressed Episode, Dysthymia, or Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood) receiving the TAU supplemented with counseling. Control group had 30 patients with diagnosis of Depression receiving only the TAU. Results: The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score improved in both groups. Patients in the experimental group showed greater improvement compared to the control group at T2. The World Health Organization Quality OF Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL) score also improved in the experimental group but not in the control group. The improvement in the experimental group was statistically significant in terms of both BDI and WHOQOL scores. Conclusions: Adding counseling to TAU in general medical practice settings is more effective in controlling the symptoms of depression and improving the quality of life as measured over a period of six months, than TAU alone. These results while encouraging, also calls for a larger study involving a largersample size and a longer period of time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mg Carta
- Centro di Psichiatria di Consultazione e Psicosomatica, University of Cagliari and AOU Cagliari, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bower P, Knowles S, Coventry PA, Rowland N. Counselling for mental health and psychosocial problems in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 2011:CD001025. [PMID: 21901675 PMCID: PMC7050339 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001025.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of mental health and psychosocial problems in primary care is high. Counselling is a potential treatment for these patients, but there is a lack of consensus over the effectiveness of this treatment in primary care. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of counselling for patients with mental health and psychosocial problems in primary care. SEARCH STRATEGY To update the review, the following electronic databases were searched: the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis (CCDAN) trials registers (to December 2010), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (to May 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of counselling for mental health and psychosocial problems in primary care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Data were extracted using a standardised data extraction sheet by two reviewers. Trials were rated for quality by two reviewers using Cochrane risk of bias criteria, to assess the extent to which their design and conduct were likely to have prevented systematic error. Continuous measures of outcome were combined using standardised mean differences. An overall effect size was calculated for each outcome with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Continuous data from different measuring instruments were transformed into a standard effect size by dividing mean values by standard deviations. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to test the robustness of the results. Economic analyses were summarised in narrative form. There was no assessment of adverse events. MAIN RESULTS Nine trials were included in the review, involving 1384 randomised participants. Studies varied in risk of bias, although two studies were identified as being at high risk of selection bias because of problems with concealment of allocation. All studies were from primary care in the United Kingdom and thus comparability was high. The analysis found significantly greater clinical effectiveness in the counselling group compared with usual care in terms of mental health outcomes in the short-term (standardised mean difference -0.28, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.13, n = 772, 6 trials) but not in the long-term (standardised mean difference -0.09, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.10, n = 475, 4 trials), nor on measures of social function (standardised mean difference -0.09, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.11, n = 386, 3 trials). Levels of satisfaction with counselling were high. There was some evidence that the overall costs of counselling and usual care were similar. There were limited comparisons between counselling and other psychological therapies, medication, or other psychosocial interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Counselling is associated with significantly greater clinical effectiveness in short-term mental health outcomes compared to usual care, but provides no additional advantages in the long-term. Participants were satisfied with counselling. Although some types of health care utilisation may be reduced, counselling does not seem to reduce overall healthcare costs. The generalisability of these findings to settings outside the United Kingdom is unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Bower
- University of ManchesterHealth Sciences Research Group, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreWilliamson BuildingOxford RoadManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | - Sarah Knowles
- University of ManchesterHealth Sciences Research Group, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreWilliamson BuildingOxford RoadManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | - Peter A Coventry
- University of ManchesterHealth Sciences Research Group, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreWilliamson BuildingOxford RoadManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | - Nancy Rowland
- British Association for Counselling and PsychotherapyBACP House15 St.John's Business ParkLutterworthUKLE17 4HB
| | | |
Collapse
|