Long-term effects of intravenous iloprost in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension deteriorating on non-parenteral therapy

Incidence of Bloodstream Infection in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension under Intravenous Epoprostenol or Iloprost—A Multicentre, Retrospective Study

Intravenous synthetic prostacyclin analogs (iPCAs), such as epoprostenol, treprostinil and iloprost have been widely used for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite having good outcomes, continuous infusion of iPCAs has been associated with some adverse effects. Bloodstream infection (BSI) is one of the most severe complications, although poorly recognized, especially under iloprost administration, which few studies have addressed. This study aimed to compare the BSI incidence rates between intravenous iloprost and epoprostenol administration. Patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) functional class III or IV receiving intravenous iloprost or epoprostenol through Hickman catheter, between 2004 and 2019, were retrospectively selected from two PH treatment centers. From a total of 36 patients (13 for iloprost and 23 for epoprostenol), 75% (n = 27) fulfilled the PAH criteria, mainly belonging to the idiopathic group. Overall BSI rate was 1.5/1000 days of treatment (3.38 and 0.09/1000 days for iloprost and epoprostenol, respectively). Patients receiving iloprost were at a higher risk of developing BSI than those receiving epoprostenol (HR: 12.5; 95% CI: 1.569–99.092). A higher mortality rate from BSI was also identified in the iloprost group (p = 0.04). Twenty-seven patients developed BSI, with 92% of them requiring hospitalization. A total of 29 agents were found, 10 Gram-positive (mainly Staphylococcus aureus; n = 5) and 19 Gram-negative (mainly Pseudomonas aeruginosa; n = 6) bacteria. Iloprost administration was linked to a significantly higher incidence of BSI, worse prognosis, and more BSI-related deaths than epoprostenol. BSI due to Gram-negative, commensal, low-virulence bacteria was also higher in the iloprost group. In short, physicians should be aware when prescribing iPCA to guarantee their patients’ safety and best medical care.

How to Solve the Conundrum of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia during Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a major issue in cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). HIT represents a severe adverse drug reaction after heparin administration. It consists of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia paradoxically leading to thrombotic events. Detection of antibodies against platelets factor 4/heparin (anti-PF4/H) and aggregation of platelets in the presence of heparin in functional in vitro tests confirm the diagnosis. Patients suffering from HIT and requiring cardiac surgery are at high risk of lethal complications and present specific challenges. Four distinct phases are described in the usual HIT timeline, and the anticoagulation strategy chosen for CPB depends on the phase in which the patient is categorized. In this sense, we developed an institutional protocol covering each phase. It consisted of the use of a non-heparin anticoagulant such as bivalirudin, or the association of unfractionated heparin (UFH) with a potent antiplatelet drug such as tirofiban or cangrelor. Temporary reduction of anti-PF4 with intravenous immunoglobulins (IvIg) has recently been described as a complementary strategy. In this article, we briefly described the pathophysiology of HIT and focused on the various strategies that can be applied to safely manage CPB in these patients.

Strategies for optimizing intravenous prostacyclin-analog therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous prostacyclin-analogs (PCA, e.g. epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost) have become an essential part in the therapy of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), mainly pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). They show considerable differences in pharmacology. A combination therapy including intravenous drugs is regarded as the 'gold standard' in most of PAH patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses and summarizes the studies and concepts on which this therapy is based. To date, intravenous prostacyclin-analogs are mainly administered when standard therapy fails to improve patients to low-risk status. However, preliminary data from uncontrolled studies suggest that an 'upfront triple' therapy including intravenous or subcutaneous prostacyclin-analogs could be preferable in selected patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Various IV PCA have been evaluated in the treatment of patients with PAH. Today, combination therapy is the 'gold standard' for the majority of patients. Intravenous PCA is recommended from functional class III onwards. Timing of its initiation is still a point of discussion. An escalation of therapy to IV or SC PCA is always necessary if a low-risk status cannot be achieved with other targeted therapies. Preliminary data suggest that selected patients could benefit from an 'upfront triple' therapy. Controlled studies on which such recommendation could be based are lacking.

Intravenous prostacyclin-analogue therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension - A review of the past, present and future

Therapy with intravenous prostacyclin analogues in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has been established for decades and is an integral component of the current guidelines for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Initially, these drugs were infused by external pump systems via tunnelled right atrial catheters with the need for cooling and frequent exchange of drug reservoirs. Associated complications included, among others, catheter-related infections. More recently, fully implantable pump systems have been developed with drug reservoirs that are filled transcutaneously, allowing intervals between refills of several weeks. This technique results in a low rate of infections. Epoprostenol, iloprost and treprostinil have all been used intravenously in PAH, but titration, dosing and dose escalation in long-term therapy are not standardized. Intravenous prostacyclin analogues are still under-used, despite available data suggesting that early and broad application of these therapies as part of risk-oriented, guideline-directed combination therapy for patients with PAH may lead to a survival benefit. This review provides a detailed overview of the drugs, infusion systems and dosing strategies used for intravenous therapy in patients with PAH.

Central line replacement following infection does not improve reinfection rates in pediatric pulmonary hypertension patients receiving intravenous prostanoid therapy

Treatment of pediatric pulmonary hypertension (PH) with IV prostanoids has greatly improved outcomes but requires a central line, posing inherent infection risk. This study examines the types of infections, infection rates, and importantly the effect of line management strategies on reinfection in children receiving IV prostanoids for PH. This study is a retrospective review of all pediatric PH patients receiving intravenous epoprostenol (EPO) or treprostinil (TRE) at one academic tertiary care center between 2000 and 2014. No patients declined participation in the study or were otherwise excluded. Infectious complications were characterized by organism(s), infection rates, time to next infection, and line management decisions (salvage vs. replace). Of the 40 patients followed, 13 sustained 38 infections involving 49 pathogens, with a predominance of gram-positive (GP) organisms (n = 35). The pooled infection rate was 1.06 per 1000 prostanoid days with no difference between EPO and TRE. No significant difference in reinfection rate was observed when comparing line salvage to replacement, regardless of organism type. Both overall and organism-type comparisons suggest longer time between line infections following line salvage compared with line replacement (732 vs. 410 days overall; 793 vs. 363 days for GP; 611 vs. 581 days for gram-negative [GN]; P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Central line replacement following blood stream infections in pediatric PH patients does not improve subsequent infection rates or time to next infection, and may lead to unnecessary risks associated with line replacement, including potential loss of vascular access. A revised approach to central line infections in pediatric PH is proposed.

[Clinical and hemodynamic characteristics and possibilities for therapy in patients with severe (functional class IV) pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with diffuse connective tissue diseases]

AIM

To study the clinical and hemodynamic characteristics of a group of patients with Functional Class (FC) IV pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) developing in the presence of diffuse connective tissue diseases (DCTD) and to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous iloprost.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study enrolled 59 patients with PAN-DCTD, including 7 who had FC IV and 8 who developed this condition during a follow-up. The diagnosis of PAH was based on pulmonary artery catheterization findings. FC IV was diagnosed using the conventional New York Heart Association classification. All the patients received PAH-specific therapy (bosentan, sildenafil); the patients with FC IV had combined therapy; 4 patients were treated with intravenous iloprost calculated with reference to 0.5-2.5 ng/kg/min for 15 days. In addition to the patients with FC IV, 3 patients with unstable FC Ill were given iloprost. Besides targeted therapy, all the patients received standard treatment, including diuretics, and ionotropic therapy.

RESULTS

Evaluation of hemodynamics in patients with different FCs revealed the most important differences in right atrial pressure, cardiac output, cardiac index, and pulmonary vascular resistance. A linear relationship was seen between the level of this indicator and FC, the closest correlation being for hemodynamic parameters characterizing right ventricular systolic function. There were no changes in mean pulmonary artery pressure; only the patients with FC IV were found to have its slight elevation (from 52 ± 15 to 55 ± 11 mm Hg). Pulmonary artery wedge pressure remained unchanged regardless of FC. Intravenous iloprost was noted to have an obvious positive effect on both clinical and hemodynamic parameters. Catheterization verified improvement in 6 out of the 7 patients; no hemodynamic changes were found in 1 patient during 15-day therapy.

CONCLUSION

The patients with FC IV PAH-DCTD have clinical and hemodynamic features responsible for a fatal prognosis. The results of using intravenous iloprost in patients with decompensated PAH associated with scleroderma systematica convince to use its PAH-specific tablets in cases of verified clinical deterioration when taking its dosage form.

The mechanistic basis of prostacyclin and its stable analogues in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Role of membrane versus nuclear receptors

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease of distal pulmonary arteries in which patients suffer from elevated pulmonary arterial pressure, extensive vascular remodelling and right ventricular failure. To date prostacyclin (PGI2) therapy remains the most efficacious treatment for PAH and is the only approved monotherapy to have a positive impact on long-term survival. A key thing to note is that improvement exceeds that predicted from vasodilator testing strongly suggesting that additional mechanisms contribute to the therapeutic benefit of prostacyclins in PAH. Given these agents have potent antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory and endothelial regenerating properties suggests therapeutic benefit might result from a slowing, stabilization or even some reversal of vascular remodelling in vivo. This review discusses evidence that the pharmacology of each prostacyclin (IP) receptor agonist so far developed is distinct, with non-IP receptor targets clearly contributing to the therapeutic and side effect profile of PGI2 (EP3), iloprost (EP1), treprostinil (EP2, DP1) along with a family of nuclear receptors known as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), to which PGI2 and some analogues directly bind. These targets are functionally expressed to varying degrees in arteries, veins, platelets, fibroblasts and inflammatory cells and are likely to be involved in the biological actions of prostacylins. Recently, a highly selective IP agonist, selexipag has been developed for PAH. This agent should prove useful in distinguishing IP from other prostanoid receptors or PPAR binding effects in human tissue. It remains to be determined whether selectivity for the IP receptor gives rise to a superior or inferior clinical benefit in PAH.

An update on medical therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Over the past 20 years, great progress has been made in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Available therapies target one of three principal pathways: the endothelin (ET), nitric oxide (NO) or the prostacyclin (PGI2) pathway. Evidence shows that current drugs, used either as monotherapy or in different combinations, can improve exercise capacity, clinical symptoms, hemodynamics and even survival in PAH. Unfortunately, the disease remains incurable and the prognosis of the disease is still poor. However, existing and novel potent antiproliferative therapies are being explored, and new agents targeting different and/or additional pathways are likely to become available to clinicians in the near future. Promising candidates include tyrosine kinase antagonists (e.g. imatinib); soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators (riociguat); an oral analog of prostacyclin (selexipag); and a tissue targeting endothelin receptor antagonist (macitentan). Phase II or III trials have either been completed or are underway to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these various therapies.

Current and advancing treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension in childhood

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe and progressive intrinsic disease of the precapillary lung vasculature. Since the introduction of PAH-targeted drugs, survival of PAH patients seems to have improved. Randomized controlled trials have led to evidence-based guidelines to direct treatment in adults. However, since disease characteristics differ between adults and children, it is hazardous to simply extrapolate these guidelines to children. Moreover, pediatric data on treatment strategies and how to assess treatment response remain virtually absent. Optimal treatment strategies are highly needed to guide therapy and improve survival in children with PAH. This review provides an overview of currently available treatments for PAH and the limited efficacy and safety data in children (with the exclusion of perinatal pulmonary vascular diseases, as persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn). We also discuss potential treatment goals and how the available data can be translated into treatment strategies in pediatric PAH.