The Use of Iloprost in the Treatment of Bone Marrow Edema Syndrome of the Proximal Femur: A Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of intravenous iloprost therapy on pain, function, edema changes, and follow-up surgery in bone marrow edema syndrome of the proximal femur. Methods: A systematic literature search up to May 2022 was performed to find relevant papers that made a statement about the outcome of intravenous iloprost therapy alone. Factors such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), edema reduction, and follow-up interventions were considered. These were compared using Forest plots. Results: In 11 studies, 190 proximal femora with bone marrow edema syndrome that received intravenous iloprost therapy without further therapeutic intravenous or surgical intervention such as core decompression were studied. There was a significant mean improvement in VAS by 3.3 cm (2.07−4.5 cm) (p < 0.001) and HHS by 24.36 points (18.23−30.49) (p < 0.001) 3−6 months after receiving iloprost therapy. Only in 9.3% of cases (1.1−24.3%) did no clinical or radiological improvement occur. Conclusions: It could be shown that the existing publications support intravenous therapy with iloprost in patients with bone marrow edema syndrome and result in good clinical outcomes.

Strategies for optimizing intravenous prostacyclin-analog therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous prostacyclin-analogs (PCA, e.g. epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost) have become an essential part in the therapy of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), mainly pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). They show considerable differences in pharmacology. A combination therapy including intravenous drugs is regarded as the 'gold standard' in most of PAH patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses and summarizes the studies and concepts on which this therapy is based. To date, intravenous prostacyclin-analogs are mainly administered when standard therapy fails to improve patients to low-risk status. However, preliminary data from uncontrolled studies suggest that an 'upfront triple' therapy including intravenous or subcutaneous prostacyclin-analogs could be preferable in selected patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Various IV PCA have been evaluated in the treatment of patients with PAH. Today, combination therapy is the 'gold standard' for the majority of patients. Intravenous PCA is recommended from functional class III onwards. Timing of its initiation is still a point of discussion. An escalation of therapy to IV or SC PCA is always necessary if a low-risk status cannot be achieved with other targeted therapies. Preliminary data suggest that selected patients could benefit from an 'upfront triple' therapy. Controlled studies on which such recommendation could be based are lacking.