1
|
The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Education for Preventing and Treating Non-Specific Low Back Pain in the Hispanic Cultural Setting: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19020825. [PMID: 35055646 PMCID: PMC8776076 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
A systematic review was conducted to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of education programs to prevent and treat low back pain (LBP) in the Hispanic cultural setting. Electronic and manual searches identified 1148 unique references. Nine randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included in this review. Methodological quality assessment and data extraction followed the recommendations from the Cochrane Back Pain Review Group. Education programs which were assessed focused on active management (3 studies), postural hygiene (7), exercise (4) and pain neurophysiology (1). Comparators were no intervention, usual care, exercise, other types of education, and different combinations of these procedures. Five RCTs had a low risk of bias. Results show that: (a) education programs in the school setting can transmit potentially useful knowledge for LBP prevention and (b) education programs for patients with LBP improve the outcomes of usual care, especially in terms of disability. Education on pain neurophysiology improves the results of education on exercise, and education on active management is more effective than “sham” education and education on postural hygiene. Future studies should assess the comparative or summatory effects of education on exercise, education on pain neurophysiology and education on active management, as well as explore their efficiency.
Collapse
|
2
|
Zahari Z, Ishak A, Justine M. The effectiveness of patient education in improving pain, disability and quality of life among older people with low back pain: A systematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2020; 33:245-254. [PMID: 31356191 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-181305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to gain an overview of patient education and the effects of patient education for older people with low back pain (LBP). METHODS The search strategies were performed via EBSCO MEDLINE, EBSCO CINAHL, Science Direct, PubMed, and PEDro databases from 2006 to 2016. The keywords "patient education", "low back pain", "elderly", "older adults", "older persons" and "older people" were used during the literature search. Boolean operators were used to expand or limit the searching scope and manual exclusion was performed to choose articles eligible for this study. RESULTS A total of 2799 articles were retrieved but only five articles were related with patient education for older people with LBP. Findings suggest that patient education for older people may differ in terms of its contents such as health education, self-management, video education, and postural education. The high methodological quality of the studies revealed that patient education showed improvement in terms of pain, disability and quality of life among older people with LBP. CONCLUSIONS Patient education improved pain and had positive effects on disability and quality of life among older people with LBP. However, due to the limited number of RCTs more studies are needed to provide evidence for its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zarina Zahari
- Centre for Physiotherapy Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Azizah Ishak
- Physiotherapy Services, Kluang Utama Specialist Hospital, Kluang Johor, Malaysia
| | - Maria Justine
- Centre for Physiotherapy Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Takashima H, Yoshimoto M, Ogon I, Terashima Y, Imamura R, Akatsuka Y, Iesato N, Oshigiri T, Morita T, Takebayashi T, Emori M, Teramoto A, Yamashita T. Lumbar disc degeneration assessment using T2* relaxation time with ultra-short TE. Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 73:11-14. [PMID: 32673744 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Takashima
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, South-1, West-16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8543, Japan; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Japan.
| | - Mitsunori Yoshimoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Izaya Ogon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Terashima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Rui Imamura
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, South-1, West-16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8543, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Akatsuka
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, South-1, West-16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8543, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Iesato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Oshigiri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Tomonori Morita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Japan
| | | | - Makoto Emori
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Atsushi Teramoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Yamashita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khodakarami N. Treatment of Patients with Low Back Pain: A Comparison of Physical Therapy and Chiropractic Manipulation. Healthcare (Basel) 2020; 8:healthcare8010044. [PMID: 32102417 PMCID: PMC7151187 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8010044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a pandemic and costly musculoskeletal condition in the United States (U.S.). Patients with LBP may endure surgery, injections, and expensive visits to emergency departments. Some suggest that using physical therapy (PT) or chiropractic in the earlier stage of LBP reduces the utilization of expensive health services and lowers the treatment costs. Given that there are costs and benefits with each of these treatments, the remaining question is in a short period of time which of these treatments is optimal. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of chiropractic versus PT in the U.S. A decision tree analytic model was used for estimating the economic outcomes. The findings showed that the total average cost in the chiropractic group was $48.56 lower than the PT group. The findings also showed that the daily adjusted life years (DALY) in the chiropractic group was 0.0043 higher than the PT group. Chiropractic care was shown to be a cost-effective alternative compared with PT for adults with at least three weeks of LBP over six months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Khodakarami
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Takashima H, Takebayashi T, Ogon I, Yoshimoto M, Morita T, Imamura R, Nakanishi M, Nagahama H, Terashima Y, Yamashita T. Analysis of intra and extramyocellular lipids in the multifidus muscle in patients with chronic low back pain using MR spectroscopy. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170536. [PMID: 29227152 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyse the intra- (IMCL) and extramyocellular lipids (EMCL) concentration in the multifidus muscle (Mm) using MR spectroscopy (MRS) in patients with low back pain (LBP), and to evaluate the correlation between those lipid concentrations and age, obesity, atrophy of the Mm and LBP intensity. METHODS 60 LBP patients underwent routine diagnostic MRI of the lumbar spine before undergoing imaging for the study. Body mass index, as an indicator of obesity and visual analogue scale, as an indicator of LBP were also measured. Proton MRS was acquired with a single-voxel point-resolved spectroscopy sequence. Furthermore, the MRS volume of interest for measuring the IMCL and EMCL concentration at L4/5 for the right Mm was determined, and we measured the cross-sectional area of Mm as an indicator of muscle atrophy. RESULTS Age showed correlation with EMCL concentration (r = 0.314, p = 0.008). The body mass index showed correlation with EMCL concentration (r = 0.358, p = 0.005). The cross-sectional area of Mm showed correlation with EMCL concentration (r = -0.543, p < 0.001). Moreover, the LBP visual analogue scale showed correlation with IMCL concentration (r = 0.367, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION There were correlations between age, obesity, muscle atrophy, and EMCL concentration in Mm. IMCL concentration in Mm showed a correlation with LBP intensity. This may suggest that IMCL concentration could become an effective objective indicator of chronic LBP intensity. Advances in knowledge: We investigated the characteristics of fat content in Mm with LBP patients. This study was demonstrated the association of the IMCL and EMCL concentration in Mm with various patient parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Takashima
- 1 Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine , Sapporo, Hokkaido , Japan.,2 Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital , Sapporo, Hokkaido , Japan
| | - Tsuneo Takebayashi
- 3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Maruyama Orthopaedic Hospital , Sapporo, Hokkaido , Japan
| | - Izaya Ogon
- 1 Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine , Sapporo, Hokkaido , Japan
| | - Mitsunori Yoshimoto
- 1 Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine , Sapporo, Hokkaido , Japan
| | - Tomonori Morita
- 1 Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine , Sapporo, Hokkaido , Japan
| | - Rui Imamura
- 2 Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital , Sapporo, Hokkaido , Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakanishi
- 2 Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital , Sapporo, Hokkaido , Japan
| | - Hiroshi Nagahama
- 2 Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital , Sapporo, Hokkaido , Japan
| | - Yoshinori Terashima
- 1 Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine , Sapporo, Hokkaido , Japan
| | - Toshihiko Yamashita
- 1 Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine , Sapporo, Hokkaido , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hernon MJ, Hall AM, O'Mahony JF, Normand C, Hurley DA. Systematic Review of Costs and Effects of Self-Management Interventions for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Spotlight on Analytic Perspective and Outcomes Assessment. Phys Ther 2017; 97:998-1019. [PMID: 29029553 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzx073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence for the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) lacks consensus, which may be due to variability in the costing methods employed. PURPOSE The purposes of the study were to identify how costs and effects have been assessed in economic analysis of self-management interventions for CMP and to identify the effect of the chosen analytical perspective on cost-effectiveness conclusions. DATA SOURCES Five databases were searched for all study designs using relevant terms. STUDY SELECTION Two independent researchers reviewed all titles for predefined inclusion criteria: adults (≥18 years of age) with CMP, interventions with a primary aim of promoting self-management, and conducted a cost analysis. DATA EXTRACTION Descriptive data including population, self-management intervention, analytical perspective, and costs and effects measured were collected by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS Fifty-seven studies were identified: 65% (n = 37) chose the societal perspective, of which 89% (n = 33) captured health care utilization, 92% (n = 34) reported labor productivity, 65% (n = 24) included intervention delivery, and 59% (n = 22) captured patient/family costs. Types of costs varied in all studies. Eight studies conducted analyses from both health service and societal perspectives; cost-effectiveness estimates varied with perspective chosen, but in no case was the difference sufficient to change overall policy recommendations. LIMITATIONS Chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions where self-management is recommended, but not as a primary treatment, were excluded. Gray literature was excluded. CONCLUSION Substantial heterogeneity in the cost components captured in the assessment of self-management for CMP was found; this was independent of the analytic perspective used. Greater efforts to ensure complete and consistent costings are required if reliable cost-effectiveness evidence of self-management interventions is to be generated and to inform the most appropriate perspective for economic analyses in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian J Hernon
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Sports Science, A101 Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Amanda M Hall
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland
| | - James F O'Mahony
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Charles Normand
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deirdre A Hurley
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Sports Science, University College Dublin
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
AlAujan S, AlMazrou S, Knaggs RD, Elliott RA. Describing the characteristics, treatment pathways, outcomes, and costs of people with persistent noncancer pain managed by community pain clinics and generating an indicative estimate of cost-effectiveness: feasibility study protocol. J Multidiscip Healthc 2016; 9:237-45. [PMID: 27274268 PMCID: PMC4876937 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s97904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Low back pain (LBP) and fibromyalgia (FM), also known as chronic widespread pain (CWP), are highly prevalent chronic painful conditions that have substantial impact on patients, health care systems, and society. Diagnosis is complex and management strategies are associated with various levels of evidence for effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Multidisciplinary pain services have been shown to be effective in some settings and therefore are recommended by clinical practice guidelines as a rational treatment option to manage these patients. Knowing that these services are resource intensive, evidence is needed to demonstrate their cost-effectiveness. This study aims to describe the management of patients with LBP and FM in two community pain clinics to derive an indicative estimate of cost-effectiveness compared with standard practice. Methods This is a prospective observational multicenter study, using patient-level data. The data from this study will be combined with modelling of the long-term economic impact of community pain clinics in treating people with LBP and FM. Newly referred patients with LBP and FM who provide written consent will be included. We will collect data on functional disability, pain intensity, quality of life, and health resource utilization. Follow-up data at the 3- and 6-month points will be collected by patient-completed questionnaires and health care contact diaries. Health care resource use from diaries will be compared with patient electronic records to assess the agreement between these recording methods. Patient cohort characteristics, treatment pathways, resource use, and outcomes derived from this study will be integrated in a decision analysis model to assess the cost-effectiveness of community pain clinics compared with standard care. This feasibility study will address key methodological issues such as sample estimates and retention rate to inform the design of a future randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiekha AlAujan
- Division for Social Research in Medicines and Health, The School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Saja AlMazrou
- Division for Social Research in Medicines and Health, The School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Roger D Knaggs
- Division for Social Research in Medicines and Health, The School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Pharmacy Department and Pain Management Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rachel A Elliott
- Division for Social Research in Medicines and Health, The School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Comparison of a Stratified Group Intervention (STarT Back) With Usual Group Care in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016; 41:645-52. [PMID: 26630423 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A nonrandomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore the effectiveness of group-based stratified care in primary care. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Stratified care based on psychosocial screening (STarT Back) has demonstrated greater clinical and cost-effectiveness in patients with low back pain. However, low back pain interventions are often delivered in groups and evaluating this system of care in a group setting is important. METHODS Patients were recruited from 60 general practices and linked physiotherapy services. A new group stratified intervention was compared with a historical nonstratified control group. Patients stratified as low, medium and high risk were offered risk-matched group care. Consenting participants completed self-report measures of functional disability (primary outcome measure), pain, psychological distress, and beliefs. The historical control received a generic group intervention. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS In total, 251 patients in the new stratified intervention and 332 in the historical control were included in the primary analysis at 12 weeks. The mean age of patients was 43 ± 10.98 years. Overall adjusted mean changes in the RMDQ scores were higher in the stratified intervention than in the control arm at 12-week follow-up (P = 0.028). Exploring the risk groups, individually the high-risk stratified group, demonstrated better outcome over the controls (P = 0.031). The medium-risk stratified intervention demonstrated equally good outcomes (P = 0.125), and low-risk stratified patients, despite less intervention, did as well as the historical controls (P = 0.993). CONCLUSION Stratified care delivered in a group setting demonstrated superior outcomes in the high-risk patients, and equally good outcomes for the medium and low-risk groups. This model, embedded in primary care, provides an early and effective model of chronic disease management and adds another dimension to the utility of the STarT Back system of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2.
Collapse
|
9
|
Interventions available over the counter and advice for acute low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2013; 15:2-15. [PMID: 24373568 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2013] [Revised: 09/20/2013] [Accepted: 09/20/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED This systematic review evaluated evidence from randomized controlled trials investigating interventions available over the counter and advice that could be provided to people with acute low back pain. Searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, AMED, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO for eligible randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome measure was pain. Eligible controls included placebo, no treatment, or usual care. Two reviewers extracted data and rated study quality. A random effects model was used to pool trial effects with the overall strength of evidence described using the GRADE criteria. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (2,847 participants) evaluating advice, bed rest, simple analgesics (paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), heat application, and a topical rubefacient were included. There was low-quality evidence that bed rest is ineffective and very-low-quality evidence that advice is ineffective in the short, intermediate, and long terms. There was very-low-quality evidence that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ibuprofen and diclofenac "when required" dosing) provide an immediate analgesic effect (mean differences -10.9 [95% confidence interval = -17.6 to -4.2] and -11.3 [95% confidence interval = -17.8 to -4.9], respectively). There is very-low-quality evidence that heat wrap and a capsicum-based rubefacient provide an immediate analgesic effect (mean differences -13.5 [95% confidence interval = -21.3 to -5.7] and 17.5, P < .001, respectively), but there was no information on longer-term outcomes. PERSPECTIVE There is limited evidence that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, heat wrap, and rubefacients provide immediate pain relief for acute back pain and that bed rest and advice are both ineffective. Future research is needed to provide evidence to support rational use of over-the-counter remedies and advice for people with acute low back pain.
Collapse
|
10
|
Fischer MA, Nanz D, Shimakawa A, Schirmer T, Guggenberger R, Chhabra A, Carrino JA, Andreisek G. Quantification of Muscle Fat in Patients with Low Back Pain: Comparison of Multi-Echo MR Imaging with Single-Voxel MR Spectroscopy. Radiology 2013; 266:555-63. [PMID: 23143025 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Fischer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|