Hypertensive crisis caused by electrocauterization of the adrenal gland during hepatectomy

Transient severe haemodynamic disturbance during radical nephrectomy: a probable catecholamine surge

Catecholamine surge and haemodynamic derangements are normally expected during the surgery for pheochromocytoma and benign functioning adrenal tumours. This male patient in his 50s underwent radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. The patient had no comorbidities. Three hours into the surgery, during electrocauterisation of the upper pole of the kidney, the patient's blood pressure unexpectedly spiked to 180/110 mm Hg, which was immediately followed by a decrease in heart rate to 35-38 beats/min. The surgeons were instructed to briefly halt the surgical manipulation. The blood pressure returned to the pre-surge level within 30-45 s. The surgery was completed without further complications, and the patient had an uneventful recovery. The episode is suggestive of the probability that the electrocauterisation of the upper pole of the kidney led to the accidental cauterisation of the adrenal gland, resulting in a transient catecholamine surge, increase in blood pressure and reflex bradycardia suggesting norepinephrine release. Treating bradycardia with atropine in such situations can exacerbate the effects of catecholamines and lead to dangerous tachyarrhythmias. The case report highlights the importance of vigilant monitoring during electrocauterisation of the upper pole of the kidney, invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in detecting and recording such occurrences and cautiously selecting a treatment plan.

Rates of Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma Screening in At-Risk Populations

CONTEXT

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL) are rare causes of secondary hypertension, but when unrecognized, they can lead to serious complications. Data regarding PPGL screening are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the rates and patterns of PPGL screening among eligible patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of adults with hypertension seen in outpatient clinics of a large academic center between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020. We included patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, hypertension at age < 35 years, and/or adrenal mass(es).

RESULTS

Of 203 535 patients with hypertension identified, 71 088 (35%) met ≥ 1 inclusion criteria, and 2013 (2.83%) were screened for PPGL. Patients screened were younger (56.2 ± 17.4 vs 64.0 ± 17.1 years), more often women (54.1% vs 44.2%), and never-smokers (54.6% vs 47.5%, P < 0.001 for all). The rate of screening was highest in patients with hypertension and adrenal mass(es) (51.7%, vs 3.9% in patients with early-onset hypertension, and 2.4% in those with treatment-resistant hypertension). Multivariable logistic regression showed higher odds ratio (OR) of PPGL screening in women (OR [95% CI]: 1.48 [1.34-1.63]); Black vs White patients (1.35 [1.19-1.53]); patients with adrenal mass(es) (55.1 [44.53-68.15]), stroke (1.34 [1.16-1.54]), dyslipidemia (1.41 [1.26-1.58]), chronic kidney disease (1.40 [1.26-1.56]), and obstructive sleep apnea (1.96 [1.76-2.19]).

CONCLUSION

PPGL screening is pursued in roughly half of patients with adrenal nodules and hypertension, but rarely in patients with treatment-resistant or early-onset hypertension. Similar to screening for other forms of secondary hypertension, PPGL screening occurs more often after serious complications develop.

Mechanism of hypertensive crisis during energy device ablation of the adrenal gland: An experimental animal study

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the mechanism of hypertensive crisis during energy device ablation of the adrenal gland.

METHODS

Electrocoagulation on the adrenal glands of six pigs was carried out with the same energy device (VIO300D) using four methods: (i) monopolar coagulation; (ii) monopolar soft coagulation using IO-advanced ball-type electrodes; (iii) bipolar soft coagulation by pinching; and (iv) bipolar soft coagulation by non-pinching (surface contact) using Bipolar forceps Premium. After electrocoagulation for 5 s, blood pressure and pulse changes were monitored, and adrenal hormones were measured from a central vein. The adrenal glands were removed, and the degree of tissue damage was scored histologically.

RESULTS

Hypertensive crisis occurred with electrocoagulation of the adrenal gland by the monopolar coagulation, monopolar soft coagulation and bipolar soft coagulation pinching methods. Blood pressure did not change with the bipolar soft coagulation non-pinching method. Pathologically, tissue damage to the adrenal medulla was associated with elevated blood pressure and adrenaline and noradrenaline release.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertensive crisis caused by energy device ablation to the adrenal gland is caused by the release of catecholamines due to heat damage to the adrenal medulla rather than the type of energy device. Proper use of an energy device that does not cause thermal degeneration of the medulla is required to prevent hypertensive crisis.

Hypertensive crisis during spinal anesthesia due to undiagnosed pheochromocytoma

Undiagnosed pheochromocytoma poses significant intraoperative challenges to the anesthesiologist. These tumors generally cause profound hypotension after spinal anesthesia. We present an unusual case of a hypertensive crisis occurring in a patient under spinal anesthesia. Due to intraoperative hemodynamic instability, the case was converted to general anesthesia with a volatile anesthetic. Postoperative workup was consistent with a pheochromocytoma. Pheochromocytomas are rare, but given their significant intraoperative morbidity and mortality, they should be considered in the differential diagnosis of unexpected intraoperative hemodynamic changes.