Focused cardiac ultrasound: a training course for pediatric intensivists and emergency physicians

Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Multi-Disciplinary Improvement Opportunities in Acute Systolic Heart Failure Management in a Pediatric Emergency Center

Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has the ability to rapidly assess function and identify systolic heart failure (HF), an often-missed diagnosis. POCUS has the potential to expedite medical intervention, improving overall outcomes. There have been limited studies describing pediatric emergency center (EC) utilization of cardiac POCUS and its impact on outcomes in pediatric patients. Authors performed a retrospective chart review at a tertiary children's hospital to identify all patients admitted from the EC to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) with acute systolic HF between January 2017 and August 2019. Outcome measures included EC length of stay (LOS), CICU LOS, and time until first IV HF medicine was administered. A total of 21 patients and 24 encounters meeting criteria were identified. Cardiac POCUS agreed with standard echocardiography in 8 of 9 cases. Patients who had a cardiac POCUS in the EC seemed more likely to receive their first dose of intravenous heart failure medication while in the Emergency Center (70% vs 43%). There was a trend toward significance, but it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1). EC and CICU LOS were not significantly different between POCUS and non-POCUS groups. Cardiac POCUS has the potential to have a valuable role in the early diagnosis of acute systolic HF in children. However, early diagnosis by POCUS did not translate into shorter EC or CICU LOS. This pilot data serves as a baseline for efforts to promote earlier clinical recognition of acute HF and more efficient collaboration between clinical services.

Neonatal performed echocardiography course: Can we face it?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate students' qualification after a six-month basic course of Neonatal Performed Echocardiography (NPEcho), adjusted by the motivational profile.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort of 16 neonatologists/neonatal fellows who underwent the basic NPEcho course in 2019 (18 h face-to-face theoretical classes; 36 h hands-on training) and 12 in 2020 (18 h online theoretical classes; 36 h hands-on training). Students' qualification was defined as ≥70% in post-test, video test, and practical evaluation in neonates. Academic Motivation Scale was applied.

RESULTS

Scores in 2019 vs. 2020 were: pre-test -32% vs. 40% (p = 0.029), final theoretical score -78% vs. 69% (p = 0.007), and practical evaluation -88% vs. 65% (p = 0.003), resulting in 68.8% in 2019 vs. 33.3% in 2020 qualified students. Students' motivational profile were similar in 2019 and 2020.

CONCLUSION

The NPEcho was successful in qualifying students with face-to-face theoretical classes, but the online format was inadequate to achieve the learning goals.

Stroke Volume Measurements by Echocardiography and Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor in Children: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output monitoring is a cornerstone of hemodynamic assessment. Noninvasive technologies are increasingly used in children. This study compared SV measurements obtained by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound techniques (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor [USCOM]), transthoracic echocardiography jugular (TTE-J), and parasternal (TTE-P) views performed by pediatric intensivists (OP-As) with limited training in cardiac sonography (20 previous examinations) and pediatric cardiologists (OP-Bs) with limited training in USCOM (30 previous examinations) in spontaneously ventilating children.

METHODS

A single-center study was conducted in 37 children. Each operator obtained 3 sets of USCOM SV measurements within a period of 3 to 5 minutes, followed with TTE measurements from both apical and jugular views. The investigators were blinded to each other's results to prevent visual and auditory bias.

RESULTS

Both USCOM and TTE methods were applicable in 89% of patients. The intraobserver variability of USCOM, TTE-J, and TTE-P were less than 10% in both investigators. The SV measurements by OP-As using USCOM, TTE-J, and TTE-P were 46.15 (25.48) mL, 39.45 (20.65) mL, and 33.42 (16.69) mL, respectively. The SV measurements by OP-Bs using USCOM, TTE-J, and TTE-P were 43.99 (25.24) mL, 38.91 (19.98) mL, and 37.58 (19.81) mL, respectively.The percentage error in SV with USCOM relative to TTE-J was 36% in OP-As and 37% in OP-Bs. The percentage error in SV with TTE-P was 33% relative to TTE-J in OP-As and 21% in OP-Bs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that the methods are not interchangeable because SV values by USCOM are higher in comparison with the SV values obtained by TTE. Both methods have low level of intraobserver variability. The SV measurements obtained by TTE-P were significantly lower compared with the TTE-J for the operator with limited training in echocardiography. The TTE-P requires longer practice compared with the TTE-J; therefore, we recommend to prefer TTE-J to TTE-P for inexperienced operators.

Implementation and Assessment of a Hybrid Training Course on Point-of-Care Pediatric Ultrasound in Vietnam During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background As point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has gained popularity, some educational guidelines have been developed. However, in Vietnam, no training course in pediatric POCUS has yet been developed. This was challenging, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objectives This study aimed to implement a three-month hybrid training course for pediatric POCUS training in Vietnam using both online and face-to-face hands-on sessions and to assess participants' self-efficacy level and change in their attitudes towards pediatric POCUS. Methods A hybrid training course in pediatric POCUS was implemented at a children's hospital in Vietnam. This study developed a standardized training course, including online learning, live lectures, hands-on sessions, and skill assessment based on the POCUS consensus educational guidelines. Physicians interested in pediatric POCUS were recruited for participation. They completed a self-evaluation survey before and after the course using a Likert score to assess their background, self-efficacy in performing POCUS, overall satisfaction with the course, and change in their attitudes towards POCUS three months after the course. Results A total of 19 physicians participated in the course. The mean post-training self-efficacy score was significantly higher than the pre-course assessment score: 73.1 (standard deviation (SD): 7.2) vs. 48.9 (SD: 12.5) (p <0.05). The efficacy level was retained three months after the course. Furthermore, overall satisfaction with the course was high at 9.5 (SD: 0.6). After the course, almost all participants strongly agreed to increase the use of POCUS in their clinical practice. Conclusion A hybrid training course in pediatric POCUS was successfully implemented in Vietnam and found the participants' self-efficacy level to be significantly higher after the course and the effect to be retained after the course. The training course could positively affect the participants' attitudes towards POCUS, encouraging them to use POCUS more frequently in their clinical practice.

Cardiac POCUS in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW

The cardiac point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is among the most impactful examinations in the evaluation of an ill child. This paper will review the English-language literature on cardiac POCUS in the pediatric emergency department (PED), the adult emergency literature with relevance to pediatric emergency, and other pediatric cardiac studies outside pediatric emergency with relevance to PED detection of potentially emergent pediatric cardiac pathology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pediatric emergency physicians can reliably detect decreased left-sided systolic function and pericardial effusion using POCUS. Case reports show that pediatric emergency physicians have detected right-sided outflow tract obstruction, aortic root dilatation, and congenital cardiac disease using POCUS. Training for pediatric cardiac POCUS competency is feasible, and cardiac POCUS does not increase the burden on cardiology resources to the PED.

SUMMARY

While cardiac pathology in children is relatively rare, pediatric cardiac POCUS can incorporate a broad curriculum beyond systolic function and the presence of pericardial fluid. Further research should assess pediatric emergency physician performance in the identification of a broader range of cardiac pathology.

Focused cardiac ultrasound in pregnancy

Cardiac disease in pregnancy is an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. In many high-income countries, acquired cardiac disease is now the largest cause of maternal mortality. Given its prevalence in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), rheumatic heart disease is the most common cause of cardiac disease in pregnancy worldwide and is associated with poor maternal outcome. The diagnosis of cardiac disease in pregnancy is often delayed resulting in excess maternal morbidity and mortality. Maternal mortality review committees have suggested that prompt recognition and treatment of heart disease in pregnancy may improve maternal outcome. Given the similarities between symptoms of normal pregnancy and those of cardiac disease, the clinical diagnosis of heart disease in pregnancy is challenging with echocardiography being the primary diagnostic modality. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) at the point of care provides supplemental data to the history and physical examination and has been demonstrated to permit early diagnosis and improvement in the management of cardiac disease in emergency medicine, intensive care, and anesthesia. It has also been demonstrated to be useful in surveillance for rheumatic heart disease in LMICs. The use of FOCUS may allow earlier and more accurate diagnosis of cardiac disease in pregnancy with the potential to decrease morbidity and mortality in both developed and developing countries.

Development and Validation of a Point-of-Care-Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment Tool: The POCUS IQ Scale

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to develop a standardized scoring tool to measure point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) image quality and to determine validity evidence for its use to assess lung ultrasound image quality.

METHODS

The POCUS Image Quality (POCUS IQ) scale was developed by POCUS-trained physicians to assess sonographers' image acquisition skills by evaluating image quality for any POCUS application. The scale was piloted using lung images of healthy standardized patients acquired by three expert sonographers compared to three novices before and after training. All images (experts, novices pre-training, novices post-training) were scored on the POCUS IQ scale by three blinded POCUS-trained physicians. Reliability was assessed with fully-crossed generalizability and decision studies. Validity was assessed using Messick's framework.

RESULTS

Content validity was supported by the tool's development process of literature review, expert consensus, and pilot testing. Response process was supported by reviewer training and the blinded scoring process. Relation to other variables was supported by scores relating to sonographer experience: median expert score = 10.5/14 (IQR: 4), median novice pre-training score = 6/14 (IQR: 2.25), and novices' improvement after training (median post-training score = 12/14, IQR: 3.25). Internal structure was supported by internal consistency data (coefficient alpha = 0.84, omega coefficient = 0.91) and the generalizability study showing the main contributor to score variability was the sonographer (51%). The G-coefficient was 0.89, suggesting very good internal structure, however, Gwet's AC₂  was 0.5, indicating moderate interrater reliability. The D study projected a minimum of 1 reviewer and 2 patients are needed for good psychometric reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

The POCUS scale has good preliminary validity evidence as an assessment tool for lung POCUS image acquisition skills. Further studies are needed to demonstrate its utility for other POCUS applications and as a feedback tool for POCUS learners.

Diagnostic Utility of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Supplementary Information

Criteria, Processes, and Determination of Competence in Basic Critical Care Echocardiography Training: A Delphi Process Consensus Statement by the Learning Ultrasound in Critical Care (LUCC) Initiative

BACKGROUND

With the paucity of high-quality studies on longitudinal basic critical care echocardiography (BCCE) training, expert opinion guidelines have guided BCCE competence educational standards and processes. However, existing guidelines lack precise detail due to methodological flaws during guideline development.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

To formulate methodologically robust guidelines on BCCE training using evidence and expert opinion, detailing specific criteria for every step, we conducted a modified Delphi process using the principles of the validated AGREE-II tool. Based on systematic reviews, the following domains were chosen: components of a longitudinal BCCE curriculum; pass-grade criteria for image-acquisition and image-interpretation; and formative/summative assessment and final competence processes.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Between April 2020 and May 2021, a total of 21 BCCE experts participated in four rounds. Rounds 1 and 2 used five web-based questionnaires, including branching-logic software for directed questions to individual panelists. In round 3 (videoconference), the panel finalized the recommendations by vote. During the journal peer-review process, Round 4 was conducted as Web-based questionnaires. Following each round, the agreement threshold for each item was determined as ≥ 80% for item inclusion and ≤ 30% for item exclusion.

RESULTS

Following rounds 1 and 2, agreement was reached on 62 of 114 items. To the 49 unresolved items, 12 additional items were added in round 3, with 56 reaching agreement and five items remaining unresolved. There was agreement that longitudinal BCCE training must include introductory training, mentored formative training, summative assessment for competence, and final cognitive assessment. Items requiring multiple rounds included two-dimensional views, Doppler, cardiac output, M-mode measurement, minimum scan numbers, and pass-grade criteria. Regarding objective criteria for image-acquisition and image-interpretation quality, the panel agreed on maintaining the same criteria for formative and summative assessment, to categorize BCCE findings as major vs minor and a standardized approach to errors, criteria for readiness for summative assessment, and supervisory options.

INTERPRETATION

In conclusion, this expert consensus statement presents comprehensive evidence-based recommendations on longitudinal BCCE training. However, these recommendations require prospective validation.

Carotid Doppler Ultrasonography for Hemodynamic Assessment in Critically Ill Children

An accurate assessment of cardiovascular performance is essential to predict and evaluate hemodynamic response to interventions. The objective of this prospective study was to assess whether point-of-care ultrasonography of the common carotid artery (CCA) can estimate the stroke volume (SV) and cardiac index (Ci) of critically ill children. Participants underwent Doppler ultrasonography of the left CCA and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Variables measured by TTE were SV and Ci. Carotid blood flow (CBF) was calculated based on both systolic velocity-time integral (CBF_(s)) and total velocity-time integral (CBF_(t)). Carotid corrected flow time(CFT)was also determined. A total of 50 children were enrolled. The median age and weight of participants were 36.0 months and 14.2 kg, respectively. Both CBF_(s) and CBF_(t) correlated very strongly with SV (ρ = 0.98 and 0.97, respectively) and Ci (ρ = 0.96 and 0.92, respectively). Agreement analysis showed low biases and clinically acceptable percentage errors between variables measured by TTE (SV and Ci) and those estimated by Doppler ultrasonography. Linear regression analysis revealed that the Ci of mechanically ventilated children can be estimated by the following equation: [Formula: see text]. CFT did not significantly correlate with SV or Ci (ρ = 0.27 and 0.05, respectively). Doppler ultrasonography of the left CCA is able to estimate the SV and Ci of critically ill children. Therefore, the CDU may be considered as an alternative for estimating Ci in critically ill children when TTE is not feasible or available.

Use of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Pediatric Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES

We sought to describe the test characteristics of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians after structured cardiac POCUS training.

METHODS

We evaluated the use of clinically indicated cardiac POCUS by PEM physicians in a single tertiary care pediatric emergency department after implementation of a focused cardiac POCUS training curriculum. The test characteristics of the sonologist interpretation were compared with expert POCUS review, by PEM physicians who have completed PEM POCUS fellowship training, for the assessment of both pericardial effusion and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

RESULTS

A total of 1241 cardiac POCUS examinations were performed between July 2015 and December 2017, of which 456 were clinically indicated and underwent expert POCUS review and comprised the study sample. These examinations were performed by 33 different PEM attending sonologists. Chest pain (52%), dyspnea (20%), and tachycardia (18%) were the most common indications for cardiac POCUS. Prevalence of pericardial effusion and global systolic dysfunction based on expert POCUS review were 11% (48/443) and 4% (16/435), respectively. Real-time cardiac POCUS interpretation had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 99.5%, respectively, for both pericardial effusion and left ventricular systolic dysfunction when compared with expert POCUS review.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac POCUS is both sensitive and specific for identifying pericardial effusion and left ventricular systolic dysfunction when performed by PEM attendings with focused training.

The evolution of cardiac point of care ultrasound for the neonatologist

Cardiac point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly being utilized in neonatal intensive care units to provide information in real time to aid clinical decision making. While training programs and scope of practice have been well defined for other specialties, such as adult critical care and emergency medicine, there is a lack of structure for neonatal cardiac POCUS. A more comprehensive and advanced hemodynamic evaluation by a neonatologist has previously published its own clinical guidelines and specific rigorous training programs have been established to achieve competency in neonatal hemodynamics. However, it is becoming increasingly evident that access and training for basic cardiac assessment by ultrasound enhances bedside clinical care for specific indications. Recently, expert consensus POCUS guidelines for use in neonatal and pediatric intensive care endorsed by the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) have been published to guide the clinicians in using POCUS for specific indications, though the line between cardiac POCUS and advanced hemodynamic evaluation remains somewhat fluid.Conclusion: This article is focused on neonatal cardiac POCUS and its evolution, value, and limitations in the modern neonatal clinical practice. Cardiac POCUS can provide physiological and hemodynamic information in making clinical decisions while dealing with neonatal emergencies. However, it should be applied only for the specific indications and should be performed by a clinician trained in cardiac POCUS. There is an urgent need of developing cardiac POCUS curriculum and certification to support a widespread and safe use in neonates. What is Known: • International training guidelines and curriculum have been published for neonatologist-performed echocardiography (NPE) or targeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE). • International evidence-based guidelines for use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in neonates and children have been recently published. What is New: • Cardiac POCUS is increasingly being incorporated in neonatal practice for emergency situations. However, one must be aware of its specific indications and limitations, especially for the neonatal clinical practice. • Cardiac POCUS and NPE/TNE are continuum of cardiac imaging with different indications and training requirements.

Implementation and assessment of a pediatric point-of-care ultrasound training course in Japan: a pilot study

Purpose

The popularity of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has led to the creation of educational guidelines for its use. In Japan, however, a comprehensive training course for POCUS use in pediatric emergency medicine has yet to be developed. The present study aimed to implement a pilot course for pediatric POCUS training in Japan and to compare participants’ self-efficacy level before and after the course.

Methods

A half-day training course in pediatric POCUS was implemented at a meeting of the Japan Society of Point-of-Care Ultrasound. A standardized training course, including pre-learning materials, live lectures, and hands-on sessions, was developed based on the US consensus educational guidelines. Physicians interested in pediatric POCUS were recruited for participation and completed a self-evaluation survey before and after the course to access their background, self-efficacy in performing selected ultrasound procedures before and after the course, and their overall satisfaction with the course.

Results

In total, 31 physicians participated. Of these, 25 completed the survey. Ten participants were in post-graduate year (PGY) 1–2, 13 were in PGY 3–5, and eight were in PGY 6 or higher. The post-training self-efficacy score was significantly higher than the pre-course assessment score (86.0 [standard deviation (SD): 19.2] vs. 35.6 [SD 17.6], p =  < 0.05, mean difference: 49.6 [95% confidence interval 39.6–61.2]). Furthermore, overall satisfaction with the course was high at 8.6 (SD 1.8).

Conclusion

The present study implemented a pilot training course in pediatric POCUS and found the participants’ self-efficacy level to be significantly higher after the course.

The Utility of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Objectives: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in adult critical care environments has become the standard of care in many hospitals. A robust literature shows its benefits for both diagnosis and delivery of care. The utility of POCUS in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), however, is understudied. This study describes in a series of PICU patients the clinical indications, protocols, findings and impact of pediatric POCUS on clinical management. Design: Retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive POCUS scans performed by a PICU physician. Patients: Pediatric critical care patients who required POCUS scans over a 15-month period. Setting: The pediatric and cardiac ICUs at a tertiary pediatric care center. Interventions: Performance of a POCUS scan by a pediatric critical care attending with advanced training in ultrasonography. Measurement and Main Results: A total of 200 POCUS scans comprised of one or more protocols (lung and pleura, cardiac, abdominal, or vascular diagnostic protocols) were performed on 155 patients over a 15-month period. The protocols used for each scan reflected the clinical question to be answered. These 200 scans included 133 thoracic protocols, 110 cardiac protocols, 77 abdominal protocols, and 4 vascular protocols. In this series, 42% of scans identified pathology that required a change in therapy, 26% confirmed pathology consistent with the ongoing plans for new therapy, and 32% identified pathology that did not result in initiation of a new therapy. Conclusions: POCUS performed by a trained pediatric intensivist provided useful clinical information to guide patient management.

A trend skill that makes pediatric intensivists stand out: Critical care echocardiography

Recently, the use of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) by pediatricians especially in emergency and intensive care departments has become increasingly popular. Critical care echocardiography (CCE) quickly and accurately identifies cardiac function, allowing intensivists to manage critically ill pediatric patients by manipulating vasoactive-inotrope-fluid treatment based on the echocardiographic results. Training courses for POCUS are increasingly available and more intensivists are learning how to use CCE. In this review, we focus on the importance and utility of CCE in pediatric intensive units and how it assists in the management of hemodynamically unstable pediatric patients. We highlight the common measurements carried out by intensive care specialists and emphasize the role of the CCE methods in PICUs.

Ultrasound in paediatric anaesthesia - A comprehensive review

The use of ultrasound is becoming more widespread in anaesthesia. In this review, we discuss the use of ultrasound in various aspects of paediatric anaesthesia and how it can be used to assist diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and the evidence available. We explore the use of ultrasound as an adjunct for regional anaesthesia, vascular access, airway management, bedside cardiac, pulmonary and abdominal imaging and intracranial pressure monitoring.

Evaluation of a Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Protocol in a Pediatric Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) protocol in a pediatric emergency department (PED).

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional, observational, quality improvement project in a PED of an urban tertiary care children's hospital. A FoCUS protocol was collaboratively developed by pediatric cardiology and pediatric emergency medicine. This included a reference document with definitions, indications, image acquisition guidelines, and interpretation expectations. We measured physician-sonographer performance against pediatric cardiologist interpretation of stored cine clips as our reference standard. Focused cardiac ultrasound interpretation was dichotomized for the presence or absence of pericardial effusion, depressed left ventricular function, and chamber size abnormalities. Run charts were used to compare the number FoCUS performed each month and the quality of captured cine clips with those from the previous year.

RESULTS

Ninety-two FoCUSs were performed by 34 different physician-sonographers from January to December 2016. The prevalence of FoCUS abnormalities was 18.5%. For pericardial effusion, sensitivity was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48%-100%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI, 94%-100%). For depressed function, sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 54%-100%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI, 94%-100%). For chamber size abnormalities, sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 54%-100%) and specificity was 95% (95% CI, 89%-99%). The median number of monthly FoCUS increased from 1 (preprotocol) to 5 (postprotocol), and the median rate of adequate studies increased from 0% to 55%.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the collaborative development and successful implementation of a PED FoCUS protocol. Physician-sonographer interpretation of FoCUS yielded acceptable results. Improvements in FoCUS utilization and cine clip adequacy were observed.

Assessing the effectiveness of pediatric emergency medicine education in emergency medicine residency training: A national survey

Background:

Evaluating the effectiveness of pediatric emergency medicine training is essential to ensure that emergency physicians and emergency medicine residents have sufficient knowledge, skill, and confidence in optimizing care for acute pediatric visits. Although the field of pediatric emergency medicine has experienced phenomenal growth in past decades, it still faces challenges in how to best implement the curriculums in emergency medicine residency training programs.

Objectives:

Exploring emergency physicians’ and emergency residents’ perspectives on pediatric emergency medicine training in emergency residency training programs in Taiwan through a nationwide survey.

Methods:

The survey was distributed to 1281 emergency physicians and emergency medicine residents in 43 teaching hospitals. The survey inquired about demographic data, hospital type, rank of proctored trainers and assessors, and the setting of pediatric emergency medicine training. Participants’ confidence in managing acute pediatric visits and their satisfaction and reflections of their pediatric emergency medicine training were explored.

Results:

In all, 258 responses were received from 117 residents and 141 emergency physicians. Seventy-seven percent reported working in medical centers. Clinical supervision was primarily performed by pediatric attending physicians and emergency physicians. Fifty-eight percent of participants felt satisfied with their pediatric emergency medicine training. However, only 52.3% felt confident managing acute pediatric visits, which was attributed to inadequate exposure to pediatric patients. Residents noted lack of confidence in managing newborns, infants, and clinical procedures. Therefore, simulation training and point-of-care ultrasound learning were considered advantageous.

Conclusion:

The pediatric emergency medicine training in emergency medicine residency programs is diverse in intensive care training, supervisors, and assessors. Surveys demonstrate that learning experience in pediatric wards and emergency department rotations is associated with overall satisfaction with pediatric emergency medicine training; inadequate exposure to pediatric patients contributed to learners having less confidence. Emergency medicine residency program reform might focus on adequate hands-on pediatric patient care.

International evidence-based guidelines on Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC)

BACKGROUND

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is nowadays an essential tool in critical care. Its role seems more important in neonates and children where other monitoring techniques may be unavailable. POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) aimed to provide evidence-based clinical guidelines for the use of POCUS in critically ill neonates and children.

METHODS

Creation of an international Euro-American panel of paediatric and neonatal intensivists expert in POCUS and systematic review of relevant literature. A literature search was performed, and the level of evidence was assessed according to a GRADE method. Recommendations were developed through discussions managed following a Quaker-based consensus technique and evaluating appropriateness using a modified blind RAND/UCLA voting method. AGREE statement was followed to prepare this document.

RESULTS

Panellists agreed on 39 out of 41 recommendations for the use of cardiac, lung, vascular, cerebral and abdominal POCUS in critically ill neonates and children. Recommendations were mostly (28 out of 39) based on moderate quality of evidence (B and C).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based guidelines for the use of POCUS in critically ill neonates and children are now available. They will be useful to optimise the use of POCUS, training programs and further research, which are urgently needed given the weak quality of evidence available.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound echocardiography diagnosis of an atrial myxoma in a child presenting with stroke

We describe a case of paediatric stroke secondary to atrial myxoma, diagnosed in the Emergency Department by Point-of-Care echocardiography. A previously fit and healthy teenage male presented to our paediatric emergency department following a collapse with loss of consciousness. He had suffered a stroke, and had facial paralysis and hemiplegia. His cardiac examination revealed a 3/6 ejection systolic murmur. Whilst his CT was being reported, he had a Point-of-Care echocardiogram in the resuscitation room which showed a very large mass arising from the left atrium and occupying >50% of the chamber. A piece of the myxoma had detached and caused the stroke. The patient was rapidly transferred to a cardiac intensive care unit and underwent emergency surgery the same day. His tumour was successfully completely resected, and he has only a mild residual hemiplegia. Cardiac myxoma should be considered in any child who presents with unexplained acute stroke and a cardiac murmur. Point-of-Care Ultrasound echocardiography in the Paediatric Emergency Department can be used to make a life-saving diagnosis, enabling early surgical management and preventing lifelong complications in children.

Cardiac and lung point-of-care ultrasound in pediatric anesthesia and critical care medicine: Uses, pitfalls, and future directions to optimize pediatric care

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has found many relevant applications in pediatric anesthesia and critical care medicine. Specifically, the cardiac and pulmonary POCUS examinations provide a wealth of information from physical examination assistance to diagnostic evaluation and assessment of treatment response. However, as with any adjunct, potentially dangerous pitfalls exist when POCUS is performed, interpreted, and applied by the novice sonographer. Using case illustrations, we highlight the clinical application of POCUS in addition to potential dangers. Additionally, suggestions for learning POCUS, assessing competency and credentialing are reviewed.

Interpretation errors in focused cardiac ultrasound by novice pediatric emergency medicine fellow sonologists

Background

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) is a core competency for pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows. The objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate test characteristics of PEM-fellow-performed FOCUS for pericardial effusion and diminished cardiac function and (2) to assess image interpretation independent of image acquisition.

Methods

PEM fellows performed and interpreted FOCUS on patients who also received cardiology service echocardiograms, the reference standard. Subsequently, eight different PEM fellows remotely interpreted a subset of the PEM-acquired and cardiology-acquired echocardiograms.

Results

Eight PEM fellows performed 54 FOCUS exams, of which two had pericardial effusion and four had diminished function. PEM fellow FOCUS had a sensitivity of 50.0% (95% CI 9.19–90.8) and specificity of 100.0% (95% CI 91.1–100.0) for detecting diminished function, and sensitivity of 50.0% (95% CI 2.67–97.33) and specificity of 98.1% (95% CI 88.42–99.9) for detecting pericardial effusions. When PEM fellows remotely interpreted 15 echocardiograms, the sensitivity was 81.3% (95% CI 70.7–88.8) and specificity 75% (95% CI 67.0–81.0) for detecting diminished function, and sensitivity of 76.3% (95% CI 65.0–85.0) and specificity 94.4% (95% CI 89.0–97.0) for detecting pericardial effusion. There were no differences in sensitivity and specificity of PEM fellows’ interpretation of FOCUS studies compared to their interpretation of cardiology echocardiograms. Interrater reliability for interpretation of remote images (kappa) was 0.66 (95% CI 0.59–0.73) for effusion and 0.31 (95% CI 0.24–0.38) for function among the fellows.

Conclusion

Novice PEM fellow sonologists (a physician who performs and interprets ultrasound) in the majority of instances were able to acquire and remotely interpret FOCUS images with limited training. However, they made real-time interpretation errors and likely need further training to incorporate real-time image acquisition and interpretation into their practice.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13089-018-0113-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

New directions in point-of-care ultrasound at the crossroads of paediatric emergency and critical care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnostic capability, efficiency and versatility of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) have enabled its use in paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) and paediatric critical care (PICU). This review highlights the current applications of POCUS for the critically ill child across PEM and PICU to identify areas of progress and standardized practice and to elucidate areas for future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

POCUS technology continues to evolve and advance bedside clinical care for critically ill children, with ongoing research extending its use for an array of clinical scenarios, including respiratory distress, trauma and dehydration. Rapidly evolving and upcoming applications include diagnosis of pneumonia and acute chest syndrome, identification of intra-abdominal injury via contrast-enhancement, guidance of resuscitation, monitoring of increased intracranial pressure and procedural guidance.

SUMMARY

POCUS is an effective and burgeoning method for both rapid diagnostics and guidance for interventions and procedures. It has clinical application for a variety of conditions that span PEM and PICU settings. Formal POCUS training is needed to standardize and expand use of this valuable technology by PICU and PEM providers alike.

Image-Guided Resuscitation With Limited Transthoracic Echocardiogram in Pediatric Trauma Patients

INTRODUCTION

Limited transthoracic echocardiogram (LTTE) has been shown to be a useful tool in guiding resuscitation in adult trauma patients. Our hypothesis is that image-guided resuscitation in pediatric trauma patients with LTTE is feasible.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on highest level pediatric trauma alerts (age 18 years or younger) at our level I trauma center during a 6-month period. Patients were divided into 2 groups as follows: those who had LTTE performed (LTTE group) and those who did not have LTTE performed (non-LTTE group).

RESULTS

A total of 31 charts were reviewed; 4 patients were excluded because they died on arrival to the emergency department. Fourteen patients had LTTE performed (LTTE group); 13 patients did not have LTTE performed (non-LTTE group). There was no difference in mechanism of injury, age, injury severity score, weight, or intensive care unit admission between the groups. The LTTE group received significantly less intravenous fluid than the non-LTTE group (1.2 vs 2.3 L, P = 0.0013).Within the LTTE group, 8 patients had "full" inferior vena cava (IVC) and 6 patients had "empty" IVC. There was no difference in injury severity score between these subgroups (P = 0.1018). Less fluid was given in the group labeled with full IVC [1.1 L (0.8-1.2)] than the group with empty IVC [2.4 L (1.7-2.6)], P = 0.0005. Four of the 6 patients with "empty" IVC had a confirmed source of bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited transthoracic echocardiogram can limit the amount of unnecessary crystalloid resuscitation given to pediatric trauma patients who are not hypovolemic.

POCUS in perioperative medicine: a North American perspective

Ultrasound (US) performed at the point of care has found fertile ground in perioperative medicine. In the hands of anesthesiologists, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has become established as a powerful diagnostic and monitoring tool in the perioperative care of cardiac and non-cardiac patients. A number of point-of-care US (POCUS) applications are relevant to perioperative care, including airway, cardiac, lung and gastric US. Although guidelines exist to define the scope of practice for basic and advanced TEE, there remains a lack of such guidelines for perioperative point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), despite a number of recent calls for action in the academic anesthesia community. POCUS training has been integrated into anesthesia residency curricula in Canada and the United States of America (USA). However, a nation-wide curriculum is still lacking. Many limitations to the development of perioperative POCUS curricula exist, including the need to define the scope of practice and design integrated longitudinal learning approaches. The main anesthesiologist societies in both the USA and Canada are promoting the development of guidelines and have introduced POCUS courses into their national conferences. Although bedside US imaging has been integrated into the curricula of many medical schools in North America, the need for specific national guidelines for the training and practice of POCUS in the perioperative setting by anesthesiologists is crucial to the further development of POCUS in perioperative medicine.

Clinical impact and efficacy of bedside echocardiography on patient management in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs): A prospective study

Objective:

To determine the indication and necessity of echocardiographic assessment and therapeutic interventions in critically ill children.

Methods:

A total of 140 children, including 75 mechanically ventilated (MV) and 65 spontaneously breathing (SB) children, who were admitted consecutively from March to August 2013 were evaluated prospectively. Data regarding the indication for echocardiography and therapeutic approaches used were documented. For evaluating disease severity, the Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score III (PRISM) was ascertained. The correlation between PRISM score and the requirement of echocardiographic evaluations were analyzed.

Results:

Patients ages were between 45 days to 18 years. The male-to-female ratio was 1.33. In 35.4% patients who underwent echocardiographic evaluation, no definitive alteration occurred in treatment approach, whereas in the remaining 64.6% patients, decisive or supplemental information was gathered. Echocardiography was indicated in 88% MV children and 46.2% SB children. Echocardiographic evaluation was necessary in MV children and there was a positive correlation between the PRISM score and the requirement of echocardiographic assessment (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

Echocardiographic evaluation is an invaluable tool especially in MV children and the requirement of echocardiographic assessment increases according to clinical severity. Basic training for intensivists in this procedure is crucial and needs to be improved and supported in critically ill.

Echocardiography for patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a primer for intensive care physicians

Echocardiography is an invaluable tool in the management of patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and subsequent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support and weaning. At the very beginning, echocardiography can identify the etiology of cardiac arrest, such as massive pulmonary embolism and cardiac tamponade. Eliminating these culprits saves life and may avoid the initiation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. If the underlying causes are not identified or intrinsic to the heart (e.g., such as those caused by cardiomyopathy and myocarditis), conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) will continue to maintain cardiac output. The quality of CCPR can be monitored, and if cardiac output cannot be maintained, early institution of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation may be reasonable. Cannulation is sometimes challenging for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients. Fortunately, with the help of ultrasonography procedures including localization of vessels, selecting a cannula of appropriate size and confirmation of catheter tip may become easy under sophisticated hand. Monitoring of cardiac function and complications during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support can be done with echocardiography. However, the cardiac parameters should be interpreted with understanding of hemodynamic configuration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Thrombus and blood stasis can be identified with ultrasound, which may prompt mechanical and pharmacological interventions. The final step is extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning. A number of studies investigated the accuracy of some echocardiographic parameters in predicting success rate and demonstrated promising results. Parameters and threshold for successful weaning include aortic VTI ≥ 10 cm, LVEF > 20-25%, and lateral mitral annulus peak systolic velocity >6 cm/s. However, the effectiveness of echocardiography in ECPR patients cannot be determined in observational studies and requires randomized controlled trials in the future. The contents in this review are well known to echocardiography specialists; thus, it should be used as an educational material for emergency or intensive care physicians. There is a trend that focused echocardiography is performed by intensivists and emergency physicians.

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Hemodynamics in Neonates and Children

Hemodynamic instability and inadequate cardiac performance are common in critically ill children. The clinical assessment of hemodynamic status is reliant upon physical examination supported by the clinical signs such as heart rate, blood pressure, capillary refill time, and measurement of the urine output and serum lactate. Unfortunately, all of these parameters are surrogate markers of cardiovascular well-being and they provide limited direct information regarding the adequacy of blood flow and tissue perfusion. A bedside point-of-care echocardiography can provide real-time hemodynamic information by assessing cardiac function, loading conditions (preload and afterload) and cardiac output. The echocardiography has the ability to provide longitudinal functional assessment in real time, which makes it an ideal tool for monitoring hemodynamic assessment in neonates and children. It is indispensable in the management of patients with shock, pulmonary hypertension, and patent ductus arteriosus. The echocardiography is the gold standard diagnostic tool to assess hemodynamic stability in patients with pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, and cardiac abnormalities such as congenital heart defects or valvar disorders. The information from echocardiography can be used to provide targeted treatment in intensive care settings such as need of fluid resuscitation versus inotropic support, choosing appropriate inotrope or vasopressor, and in providing specific interventions such as selective pulmonary vasodilators in pulmonary hypertension. The physiological information gathered from echocardiography may help in making timely, accurate, and appropriate diagnosis and providing specific treatment in sick patients. There is no surprise that use of bedside point-of-care echocardiography is rapidly gaining interest among neonatologists and intensivists, and it is now being used in clinical decision making for patients with hemodynamic instability. Like any other investigation, it has certain limitations and the most important limitation is its intermittent nature. Sometimes acquiring high quality images for precise functional assessment in a ventilated child can be challenging. Therefore, it should be used in conjunction with the existing tools (physical examination and clinical parameters) for hemodynamic assessment while making clinical decisions.

Pediatric emergency medicine point-of-care ultrasound: summary of the evidence

The utility of point-of-care ultrasound is well supported by the medical literature. Consequently, pediatric emergency medicine providers have embraced this technology in everyday practice. Recently, the American Academy of Pediatrics published a policy statement endorsing the use of point-of-care ultrasound by pediatric emergency medicine providers.  To date, there is no standard guideline for the practice of point-of-care ultrasound for this specialty. This document serves as an initial step in the detailed "how to" and description of individual point-of-care ultrasound examinations.  Pediatric emergency medicine providers should refer to this paper as reference for published research, objectives for learners, and standardized reporting guidelines.

Hemodynamic Bedside Ultrasound Image Quality and Interpretation After Implementation of a Training Curriculum for Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Providers

OBJECTIVE

Bedside ultrasound for hemodynamic evaluation in critically ill children is increasingly recognized as an important skill for pediatric critical care medicine providers. Our institution implemented a training curriculum leading to institutional credentialing for pediatric critical care providers in nonprocedural bedside ultrasound core applications. We hypothesized that hemodynamic studies performed or supervised by credentialed providers (credentialed providers group) have better image quality and greater accuracy in interpretation than studies performed by non-credentialed providers without supervision (non-credentialed providers group).

DESIGN

Retrospective descriptive study.

SETTING

Single-center tertiary non-cardiac 55-bed PICU in a children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients from October 2013 to January 2015, with hemodynamic bedside ultrasound performed and interpreted by pediatric critical care providers exposed to bedside ultrasound training.

INTERVENTIONS

A cardiologist blinded to performer scored hemodynamic bedside ultrasound image quality for five core cardiac views (excellent = 3, good = 2, fair = 1, unacceptable = 0; median = quality score) and interpretation within 5 hemodynamic domains (agreement = 3, minor disagreement = 2, major disagreement = 1; median = interpretation score), as well as a global assessment of interpretation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-one studies (45 in the credentialed providers group and 36 in the non-credentialed providers group) were evaluated. There was no statistically significant difference in quality score between groups (median: 1.4 [interquartile range: 0.8-1.8] vs median: 1.2 [interquartile range: 0.75-1.6]; p = 0.14]. Studies in the credentialed providers group had higher interpretation score than those in the non-credentialed providers group (median: 3 [interquartile range: 2.5-3) vs median: 2.67 [interquartile range: 2.25-3]; p = 0.04). Major disagreement between critical care provider and cardiology review occurred in 25 of 283 hemodynamic domains assessed (8.8%), with no statistically significant difference between credentialed providers and non-credentialed providers groups (6.1% vs 11.9%; p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

Hemodynamic bedside ultrasound performed or supervised by credentialed pediatric critical care providers had more accurate interpretation than studies performed by unsupervised non-credentialed providers. A rigorous pediatric critical care medicine bedside ultrasound credentialing program can train intensivists to attain adequate images and interpret those images appropriately.

Social media to supplement point-of-care ultrasound courses: the "sandwich e-learning" approach. A randomized trial

Background

Point-of-care ultrasound (POC-US) is gaining importance in almost all specialties. E-learning has been used to teach theoretical knowledge and pattern recognition. As social media are universally available, they can be utilized for educational purposes. We wanted to evaluate the utility of the sandwich e-learning approach defined as a pre-course e-learning and a post-course learning activity using Facebook after a one-day point-of-care ultrasound (POC-US) course and its effect on the retention of knowledge.

Methods

A total of 62 medial students were recruited for this study and randomly assigned to one of four groups. All groups received an identical hands-on training and performed several tests during the study period. The hands-on training was performed in groups of five students per instructor with the students scanning each other. Group 1 had access to pre-course e-learning, but not to post-course e-learning. Instead of a pre-course e-learning, group 2 listened to presentations at the day of the course (classroom teaching) and had access to the post-course learning activity using Facebook. Group 3 had access to both pre- and post-course e-learning (sandwich e-learning) activities, while group 4 listened classroom presentations only (classroom teaching only). Therefore only groups 2 and 3 had access to post-course learning via Facebook by joining a secured group. Posts containing ultrasound pictures and videos were published to this group. The students were asked to “like” the posts to monitor attendance. Knowledge retention was assessed 6 weeks after the course.

Results

After 6 weeks, group 3 achieved comparable results when compared to group 2 (82.2 % + −8.2 vs. 84.3 + −8.02) (p = 0.3). Students who participated in the post-course activity were more satisfied with the overall course than students without post-course learning (5.5 vs. 5.3 on a range from 1 to 6).

Conclusions

In this study, the sandwich e-learning approach led to equal rates of knowledge retention compared to classroom lectures and post-course learning. Students appreciate new media for learning experiences and are more satisfied with their learning activity. The sandwich e-learning can be used to maximize hands-on training during courses.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13089-016-0037-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Preoperative Patient With a Systolic Murmur

Context:

Patients with undifferentiated systolic murmurs present commonly during the perioperative period. Traditional bedside assessment and auscultation has not changed significantly in almost 200 years and relies on interpreting indirect acoustic events as a means of evaluating underlying cardiac pathology. This is notoriously inaccurate, even in expert cardiology hands, since many different valvular and cardiac diseases present with a similar auditory signal.

Evidence Acquisition:

The data on systolic murmurs, physical examination, perioperative valvular disease in the setting of non-cardiac surgery is reviewed.

Results:

Significant valvular heart disease increases perioperative risk in major non-cardiac surgery and increases long term patient morbidity and mortality. We propose a more modern approach to physical examination that incorporates the use of focused echocardiography to allow direct visualization of cardiac structure and function. This improves the diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment, allows rational planning of surgery and anaesthesia technique, risk stratification, postoperative monitoring and appropriate referral to physicians and cardiologists.

Conclusions:

With a thorough preoperative assessment incorporating focused echocardiography, anaesthetists are in the unique position to enhance their role as perioperative physicians and influence short and long term outcomes of their patients.

The Role of Focused Echocardiography in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Critical Appraisal

Echocardiography is a key tool for hemodynamic assessment in Intensive Care Units (ICU). Focused echocardiography performed by nonspecialist physicians has a limited scope, and the most relevant parameters assessed by focused echocardiography in Pediatric ICU are left ventricular systolic function, fluid responsiveness, cardiac tamponade and pulmonary hypertension. Proper ability building of pediatric emergency care physicians and intensivists to perform focused echocardiography is feasible and provides improved care of severely ill children and thus should be encouraged.

Short training in focused cardiac ultrasound in an Internal Medicine department: what realistic skill targets could be achieved?

The importance of focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) in Internal Medicine care has been recognized by the American Society of Echocardiography. The aim of this study was to test what realistic skill targets could be achieved in FCU, with a relatively short training (theoretical and practical) of 9 h offered to Internal Medicine certification board attending students, and if the addition of further 9 h of training could significantly improve the level of competence. Kappa statistic was used to calculate the inter-observer agreement (trainees/tutor). The agreement between the trainees (who completed the entire training) and the tutor was, respectively, "substantial" (k = 0.71) for the identification of pericardial effusion, "moderate" (k = 0.56-0.54) for the identification of marked right ventricular and left ventricular enlargement, "substantial" (k = 0.77) for the assessment of global cardiac systolic function by visual inspection and "fair" (k = 0.35) for the assessment of size and respiratory change in the diameter of the inferior cave vein (IVC). 18 h training in FCU provided proficiency in obtaining adequate images from the parasternal window without providing the ability to correctly master the apical and subcostal windows. As concerns the interpretative skills, only pericardial effusion and visual estimation of global systolic function could be correctly identified, while ventricular enlargement and IVC prove to be more difficult to evaluate. This study supports incorporating FCU into Internal Medicine fellowship training programs, and should facilitate the design of other similar training courses.