1
|
Foglia E, Asperti F, Antonacci G, Jani YH, Garagiola E, Bellavia D, Ferrario L. Automated Drugs Dispensing Systems in Hospitals: a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Study Across Six European Countries. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 16:679-696. [PMID: 39319287 PMCID: PMC11421443 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s468417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Automated Drug Dispensing (ADD) systems are considered to be strategic hospital assets used to reduce errors and enhance economic and organizational sustainability. With regards to efficacy and safety, the literature evidence demonstrates the incremental benefits of centralised or decentralised systems compared to manual dispensing. Analyses about organisational and economic sustainability are still lacking and the present study aims to perform a Health Technology Assessment (HTA), producing multidimensional evidence on the use of ADD systems within hospitals. Methods In 2023, a comprehensive HTA draws insights from healthcare professionals across six European nations: Italy, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Belgium. This appraisal juxtaposed four drug dispensing scenarios: manual methods, centralized ADD systems, decentralized ADD systems, and integrated solutions employing cutting-edge technologies in both central pharmacies and wards. The study deployed an Activity-Based Costing approach that was combined with a cost-effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis to evaluate economic impacts. Qualitative questionnaires were implemented to assess ethical, legal, organizational, safety, and efficacy aspects. Results From a multidimensional perspective, healthcare professionals acknowledged ADD manifold advantages of ADD systems. From an organizational perspective and within a 12-month timeframe, transitioning to automation may face initial challenges that are attributed to potential resistance from professionals and significant investments. However, 36 months past its adoption, automation's superiority over manual methods was recognized. Economically, savings burgeoned from +17.9% in UK to +26.6% in Belgian hospitals that adopted integrated systems in comparison to traditional manual approaches. Conclusion Compared to traditional methods, implementing ADD systems could improve the logistic management of drug in the hospital setting, thereby enhancing safety and efficacy, streamlining the healthcare professionals' workflow, and bolstering financial stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuela Foglia
- LIUC - University Cattaneo, Healthcare Datascience LAB, Castellanza, Varese, 21053, Italy
| | - Federica Asperti
- LIUC - University Cattaneo, Healthcare Datascience LAB, Castellanza, Varese, 21053, Italy
| | - Grazia Antonacci
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Northwest London, London, UK
- Business School, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Innovation (CHEPI), Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Yogini H Jani
- Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Elisabetta Garagiola
- LIUC - University Cattaneo, Healthcare Datascience LAB, Castellanza, Varese, 21053, Italy
| | - Daniele Bellavia
- LIUC - University Cattaneo, Healthcare Datascience LAB, Castellanza, Varese, 21053, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Ferrario
- LIUC - University Cattaneo, Healthcare Datascience LAB, Castellanza, Varese, 21053, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carrera A, Manetti S, Lettieri E. Rewiring care delivery through Digital Therapeutics (DTx): a machine learning-enhanced assessment and development (M-LEAD) framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:237. [PMID: 38395905 PMCID: PMC10885456 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10702-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital transformation has sparked profound change in the healthcare sector through the development of innovative digital technologies. Digital Therapeutics offer an innovative approach to disease management and treatment. Care delivery is increasingly patient-centered, data-driven, and based on real-time information. These technological innovations can lead to better patient outcomes and support for healthcare professionals, also considering resource scarcity. As these digital technologies continue to evolve, the healthcare field must be ready to integrate them into processes to take advantage of their benefits. This study aims to develop a framework for the development and assessment of Digital Therapeutics. METHODS The study was conducted relying on a mixed methodology. 338 studies about Digital Therapeutics resulting from a systematic literature review were analyzed using descriptive statistics through RStudio. Machine learning algorithms were applied to analyze variables and find patterns in the data. The results of these analytical analyses were summarized in a framework qualitatively tested and validated through expert opinion elicitation. RESULTS The research provides M-LEAD, a Machine Learning-Enhanced Assessment and Development framework that recommends best practices for developing and assessing Digital Therapeutics. The framework takes as input Digital Therapeutics characteristics, regulatory aspects, study purpose, and assessment domains. The framework produces as outputs recommendations to design the Digital Therapeutics study characteristics. CONCLUSIONS The framework constitutes the first step toward standardized guidelines for the development and assessment of Digital Therapeutics. The results may support manufacturers and inform decision-makers of the relevant results of the Digital Therapeutics assessment.
Collapse
|
3
|
Collins M, Mazzei M, Baker R, Morton A, Frith L, Syrett K, Leak P, Donaldson C. Developing a combined framework for priority setting in integrated health and social care systems. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:879. [PMID: 37605123 PMCID: PMC10440867 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09866-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an international move towards greater integration of health and social care to cope with the increasing demand on services.. In Scotland, legislation was passed in 2014 to integrate adult health and social care services resulting in the formation of 31 Health and Social Care Partnerships (HSCPs). Greater integration does not eliminate resource scarcity and the requirement to make (resource) allocation decisions to meet the needs of local populations. There are different perspectives on how to facilitate and improve priority setting in health and social care organisations with limited resources, but structured processes at the local level are still not widely implemented. This paper reports on work with new HSCPs in Scotland to develop a combined multi-disciplinary priority setting and resource allocation framework. METHODS To develop the combined framework, a scoping review of the literature was conducted to determine the key principles and approaches to priority setting from economics, decision-analysis, ethics and law, and attempts to combine such approaches. Co-production of the combined framework involved a multi-disciplinary workshop including local, and national-level stakeholders and academics to discuss and gather their views. RESULTS The key findings from the literature review and the stakeholder workshop were taken to produce a final combined framework for priority setting and resource allocation. This is underpinned by principles from economics (opportunity cost), decision science (good decisions), ethics (justice) and law (fair procedures). It outlines key stages in the priority setting process, including: framing the question, looking at current use of resources, defining options and criteria, evaluating options and criteria, and reviewing each stage. Each of these has further sub-stages and includes a focus on how the combined framework interacts with the consultation and involvement of patients, public and the wider staff. CONCLUSIONS The integration agenda for health and social care is an opportunity to develop and implement a combined framework for setting priorities and allocating resources fairly to meet the needs of the population. A key aim of both integration and the combined framework is to facilitate the shifting of resources from acute services to the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa Collins
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Micaela Mazzei
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rachel Baker
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alec Morton
- Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lucy Frith
- Centre for Social Ethics & Policy, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Keith Syrett
- University of Bristol Law School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Paul Leak
- Directorate of Health and Social Care, Scottish Government, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Cam Donaldson
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kapiriri L, Essue BM, Velez CM, Julia A, Elysee N, Bernardo A, Marion D, Susan G, Ieystn W. Was priority setting included in the Canadian COVID-19 pandemic planning and preparedness? A comparative analysis of COVID-19 pandemic plans from Eight provinces and Three territories. Health Policy 2023; 133:104817. [PMID: 37150048 PMCID: PMC10074731 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Variation in priorities during pandemic planning among the federal, provincial and territorial jurisdictions are thought to have impacted Canada's ability to effectively control the spread of the COVID-19 virus, and protect the most vulnerable. The potential influence of diverse and divergent political, cultural, and behavioural factors, regarding inclusion of priority setting (PS) in pandemic preparedness planning across the country is not well understood. This study aimed to examine how the Canadian federal, provincial and territorial COVID-19 pandemic preparedness planning documents integrated PS. Methods A documentary analysis of the federal, eight provincial, three territorial COVID-19 preparedness and response plans. We assessed the degree to which the documented PS processes fulfilled established quality requirements of effective PS using the Kapiriri & Martin framework. Results While the federal plan included most of the parameters of effective PS, the provinces and territories reflected few. The lack of obligation for the provinces and territories to emulate the federal plan is one of the possible reasons for the varying inclusion of these parameters. The parameters included did not vary systematically with the jurisdiction's context. Conclusion Provinces could consider using the framework of the federal plan and the WHO guidelines to guide future pandemic planning. Regular evaluation of the instituted PS would provide a mechanism through which lessons can be harnessed and improvement strategies developed. Future studies should describe and evaluate what PS mechanisms were implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Kapiriri
- Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Beverley M Essue
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Claudia M Velez
- Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, KTH-226, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Cra 51d #62-29, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
| | - Abelson Julia
- Health Policy Program, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, L8S 4M4, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nouvet Elysee
- School of Health Studies, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Aguilera Bernardo
- Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastian, Providencia, Santiago
| | - Danis Marion
- Section on Ethics and Health Policy, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Goold Susan
- Internal Medicine and Health Management and Policy, Center for Bioethics and social sciences in medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Bldg. 14, G016, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800, USA
| | - Williams Ieystn
- School of Social Policy, HSMC, Park House, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2RT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vettoretto N, Foglia E, Gerardi C, Lettieri E, Nocco U, Botteri E, Bracale U, Caracino V, Carrano FM, Cassinotti E, Giovenzana M, Giuliani B, Iossa A, Milone M, Montori G, Peltrini R, Piatto G, Podda M, Sartori A, Allocati E, Ferrario L, Asperti F, Songia L, Garattini S, Agresta F. High-energy devices in different surgical settings: lessons learnt from a full health technology assessment report developed by SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica). Surg Endosc 2023; 37:2548-2565. [PMID: 36333498 PMCID: PMC9638482 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09734-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present paper aims at evaluating the potential benefits of high-energy devices (HEDs) in the Italian surgical practice, defining the comparative efficacy and safety profiles, as well as the potential economic and organizational advantages for hospitals and patients, with respect to standard monopolar or bipolar devices. METHODS A Health Technology Assessment was conducted in 2021 assuming the hospital perspective, comparing HEDs and standard monopolar/bipolar devices, within eleven surgical settings: appendectomy, hepatic resections, colorectal resections, cholecystectomy, splenectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, thyroidectomy, esophago-gastrectomy, breast surgery, adrenalectomy, and pancreatectomy. The nine EUnetHTA Core Model dimensions were deployed considering a multi-methods approach. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used: (1) a systematic literature review for the definition of the comparative efficacy and safety data; (2) administration of qualitative questionnaires, completed by 23 healthcare professionals (according to 7-item Likert scale, ranging from - 3 to + 3); and (3) health-economics tools, useful for the economic evaluation of the clinical pathway and budget impact analysis, and for the definition of the organizational and accessibility advantages, in terms of time or procedures' savings. RESULTS The literature declared a decrease in operating time and length of stay in using HEDs in most surgical settings. While HEDs would lead to a marginal investment for the conduction of 178,619 surgeries on annual basis, their routinely implementation would generate significant organizational savings. A decrease equal to - 5.25/-9.02% of operating room time and to - 5.03/-30.73% of length of stay emerged. An advantage in accessibility to surgery could be hypothesized in a 9% of increase, due to the gaining in operatory slots. Professionals' perceptions crystallized and confirmed literature evidence, declaring a better safety and effectiveness profile. An improvement in both patients and caregivers' quality-of-life emerged. CONCLUSIONS The results have demonstrated the strategic relevance related to HEDs introduction, their economic sustainability, and feasibility, as well as the potentialities in process improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nereo Vettoretto
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia P.O. Montichiari, Ospedale di Montichiari, Chirurgia, V.le Ciotti 154, 25018, Montichiari, BS, Italy.
| | - Emanuela Foglia
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Chiara Gerardi
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Lettieri
- Dipartimento di Ingegneria Gestionale, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Nocco
- S.C. Ingegneria Clinica, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda and Associazione Italiana Ingegneri Clinici, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Botteri
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia P.O. Montichiari, Ospedale di Montichiari, Chirurgia, V.le Ciotti 154, 25018, Montichiari, BS, Italy
| | - Umberto Bracale
- U.O.C. Chirurgie Generale e Oncologica Mini Invasiva, A.O.U. Policlinico Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Valerio Caracino
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, AUSL Pescara, Pescara, Italy
| | | | - Elisa Cassinotti
- Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Giovenzana
- Unit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale San Paolo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Beatrice Giuliani
- Unit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale San Paolo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Iossa
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza Polo Pontino, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Giulia Montori
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale di Vittorio Veneto, Treviso, Italy
| | - Roberto Peltrini
- U.O.C. Chirurgie Generale e Oncologica Mini Invasiva, A.O.U. Policlinico Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giacomo Piatto
- UOC Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, Ospedale di Montebelluna (TV), AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alberto Sartori
- UOC Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, Ospedale di Montebelluna (TV), AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Eleonora Allocati
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Ferrario
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Federica Asperti
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Letizia Songia
- S.C. Ingegneria Clinica, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda and Associazione Italiana Ingegneri Clinici, Milan, Italy
- SC Ingengeria Clinica, ASST di Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Silvio Garattini
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC, Castellanza, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Atwal S, Schmider J, Buchberger B, Boshnakova A, Cook R, White A, El Bcheraoui C. Prioritisation processes for programme implementation and evaluation in public health: A scoping review. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1106163. [PMID: 37050947 PMCID: PMC10083497 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1106163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundProgramme evaluation is an essential and systematic activity for improving public health programmes through useful, feasible, ethical, and accurate methods. Finite budgets require prioritisation of which programmes can be funded, first, for implementation, and second, evaluation. While criteria for programme funding have been discussed in the literature, a similar discussion around criteria for which programmes are to be evaluated is limited. We reviewed the criteria and frameworks used for prioritisation in public health more broadly, and those used in the prioritisation of programmes for evaluation. We also report on stakeholder involvement in prioritisation processes, and evidence on the use and utility of the frameworks or sets of criteria identified. Our review aims to inform discussion around which criteria and domains are best suited for the prioritisation of public health programmes for evaluation.MethodsWe reviewed the peer-reviewed literature through OVID MEDLINE (PubMed) on 11 March 2022. We also searched the grey literature through Google and across key websites including World Health Organization (WHO), US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), and the International Association of National Public Health Institutes (IANPHI) (14 March 2022). Articles were limited to those published between 2002 and March 2022, in English, French or German.ResultsWe extracted over 300 unique criteria from 40 studies included in the analysis. These criteria were categorised into 16 high-level conceptual domains to allow synthesis of the findings. The domains most frequently considered in the studies were “burden of disease” (33 studies), “social considerations” (30 studies) and “health impacts of the intervention” (28 studies). We only identified one paper which proposed criteria for use in the prioritisation of public health programmes for evaluation. Few prioritisation frameworks had evidence of use outside of the setting in which they were developed, and there was limited assessment of their utility. The existing evidence suggested that prioritisation frameworks can be used successfully in budget allocation, and have been reported to make prioritisation more robust, systematic, transparent, and collaborative.ConclusionOur findings reflect the complexity of prioritisation in public health. Development of a framework for the prioritisation of programmes to be evaluated would fill an evidence gap, as would formal assessment of its utility. The process itself should be formal and transparent, with the aim of engaging a diverse group of stakeholders including patient/public representatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaileen Atwal
- Economist Impact, Health Policy and Insights, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Schmider
- Economist Impact, Health Policy and Insights, London, United Kingdom
| | - Barbara Buchberger
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anelia Boshnakova
- Economist Impact, Health Policy and Insights, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Cook
- Economist Impact, Health Policy and Insights, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alicia White
- Economist Impact, Health Policy and Insights, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charbel El Bcheraoui
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
- *Correspondence: Charbel El Bcheraoui,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nicolazzo D, Rusin E, Varese A, Galassi M. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Traditional Dressing: An Italian Health Technology Assessment Evaluation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:ijerph20032400. [PMID: 36767767 PMCID: PMC9915998 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
This evaluation shows the main advantages related to the introduction of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in Italian clinical practice for the management of incisions in vascular surgery in patients suffering from peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and at risk of postoperative complications, compared to treatment with traditional dressings. A health technology assessment (HTA) activity was conducted assuming the hospital perspective, within a 12-month time horizon. The nine EUnetHTA Core Model dimensions were deeply explored, using scientific evidence on the topic, real-life data, and healthcare professionals' perceptions. The evaluation shows that the use of NPWT has had a positive impact in terms of higher clinical effectiveness and safety profile. The process mapping highlights how NPWT allows a reduction of 2.5 hospitalization days compared with standard dressing, with the consequent benefits considering economic, organizational, and social aspects. A significant economic saving per patient emerged, with an overall optimization of the patient's clinical pathway, impacting positively on the hospital's capacity. The budget impact analysis shows that the higher number of patients treated with NPWT, the higher the economic advantages. Furthermore, assuming the patient's perspective, it would generate an overall reduction in social costs of 28%. In conclusion, the results of this study provide helpful evidence-based information to policymakers through examinations of the relative values of intervention, thus supporting the overall hospital and institutional decision-making process to define appropriate areas of investments, leading to the achievement of not only higher clinical outcomes, but also important social, economic, and organizational advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alessandra Varese
- A.O.U Città dalla Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Margherita Galassi
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ferrario L, Asperti F, Aprile G, Giuliani J. HTA and Gastric Cancer: Evaluating Alternatives in Third- and Fourth-Line Patients. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:2107. [PMID: 36767474 PMCID: PMC9915553 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) represents an economic and societal burden worldwide. The present study has two aims. Firstly, it evaluates the benefits and the added value of the introduction of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in the Italian clinical practice, defining the comparative efficacy and safety profiles with respect to the other available treatment options (represented by the best supportive care (BSC) and FOLFIRI (5-FU, irinotecan, and leucovorin) regimens). Secondly, it assesses the potential economic and organizational advantages for hospitals and patients, focusing on third- and fourth-line treatments. For the achievement of the above objective, a health technology assessment study was conducted in 2021, assuming the NHS perspective within a 3-month time horizon. The literature reported a better efficacy of FTD/TPI with respect to both BSC and FOLFIRI regimens. From an economic perspective, despite the additional economic resources that would be required, the investment could positively impact the overall survival rate for the patients treated with the FTD/TPI strategy. However, the innovative molecule would lead to a decrease in hospital accesses devoted to chemotherapy infusion, ranging from a minimum of 34% to a maximum of 44%, strictly dependent on FTD/TPI penetration rate, with a consequent opportunity to take on a greater number of oncological patients requiring drug administration for the treatment of any other cancer diseases. According to experts' opinions, lower perceptions of FTD/TPI emerged concerning equity aspects, whereas it would improve both individuals' and caregivers' quality of life. In conclusion, the results have demonstrated the strategic relevance related to the introduction of FTD/TPI regarding the coverage of an important unmet medical need of patients with metastatic gastric cancer who were refractory to at least two prior therapies, with important advantages for patients and hospitals, thus optimizing the clinical pathway of such frail patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucrezia Ferrario
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC Business School, HD LAB—Healthcare Datascience, LAB LIUC University Carlo Cattaneo, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Federica Asperti
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC Business School, HD LAB—Healthcare Datascience, LAB LIUC University Carlo Cattaneo, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Aprile
- Department of Oncology, ULSS 8 Berica Hospital, 36100 Vicenza, Italy
| | - Jacopo Giuliani
- Department of Oncology, ULSS 9 Scaligera, Mater Salutis Hospital, 37045 Legnago, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zucconi G, Marchello AM, Demarco C, Fortina E, Milano L. Health Technology Assessment for the Prevention of Peri-Operative Hypothermia: Evaluation of the Correct Use of Forced-Air Warming Systems in an Italian Hospital. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 20:133. [PMID: 36612455 PMCID: PMC9819292 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
This study investigates the implications of using a system for the maintenance of normothermia in the treatment of patients undergoing surgery, determining whether the FAW (Forced-Air Warming) systems are more effective and efficient than the non-application of appropriate protocols (No Technology). We conducted Health Technology Assessment (HTA) analysis, using both real-world data and the data derived from literature, assuming the point of view of a medium-large hospital. The literature demonstrated that Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia (IPH) determines adverse events, such as surgical site infection (FAW: 3% vs. No Technology: 12%), cardiac events (FAW: 3.5% vs. No Technology: 7.6%) or the need for blood transfusions (FAW: 6.2% vs. No Technology: 7.4%). The correct use of FAW allows a medium saving of 16% per patient to be achieved, compared to the non-use of devices. The Cost Effectiveness Value (CEV) is lower in the hypothesis of FAW: it enables a higher efficacy level with a contextual optimization of patients' path costs. The social cost is reduced by around 30% and the overall hospital days are reduced by between 15% and 26%. The qualitative analyses confirmed the results. In conclusion, the evidence-based information underlines the advantages of the proper use of FAW systems in the prevention of accidental peri-operative hypothermia for patients undergoing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ljdia Milano
- Hospital Consulting Spa, 50012 Bagno a Ripoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferrario L, Garagiola E, Gerardi C, Bellavia G, Colombo S, Ticca C, Rossetti C, Ciboldi M, Meroni M, Vanzulli A, Rampoldi A, Bignardi T, Arrigoni F, Porazzi E, Foglia E. Innovative and conventional "conservative" technologies for the treatment of uterine fibroids in Italy: a multidimensional assessment. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2022; 12:21. [PMID: 35303183 PMCID: PMC8932203 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-022-00367-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the potential benefits of the Magnetic Resonance-guided high intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) introduction in the clinical practice, for the treatment of uterine fibroids, in comparison with the standard "conservative" procedures, devoted to women who wish to preserve their uterus or enhance fertility: myomectomy and uterine artery embolization (UAE). METHODS A Health Technology Assessment was conducted, assuming the payer's perspective (Italian National Healthcare Service). The nine EUnetHTA Core Model dimensions were deeply investigated, by means of i) a literature review; ii) the implementation of health economics tools (useful for uterine fibroids patients' clinical pathway economic evaluation, and budget impact analysis), to define MRgFUS economic and organizational sustainability, and iii) administration of specific questionnaires filled by uterine fibroids' experts, to gather their perceptions on the three possible conservative approaches (MRgFUS, UAE and myomectomy). RESULTS Literature revealed that MRgFUS would generate several benefits, from a safety and an efficacy profile, with significant improvement in symptoms relief. Advantages emerged concerning the patients' perspective, thus leading to a decrease both in the length of hospital stay (p-value< 0.001), and in patients' productivity loss (p-value = 0.024). From an economic point of view, the Italian NHS would present an economic saving of - 6.42%. A positive organizational and equity impact emerged regarding the capability to treat a larger number of women, thus performing, on average, 131.852 additional DRGs. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that MRgFUS could be considered an advantageous technological alternative to adopt within the target population affected by uterine fibroids, demonstrating its economic and organisational feasibility and sustainability, with consequent social benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Ferrario
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC- Università Cattaneo, Corso Matteotti, 22, 21053, Catellanza, VA, Italy.
| | - E Garagiola
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC- Università Cattaneo, Corso Matteotti, 22, 21053, Catellanza, VA, Italy
| | - C Gerardi
- IRCCS- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy
| | - G Bellavia
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - S Colombo
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - C Ticca
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - C Rossetti
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - M Ciboldi
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - M Meroni
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - A Vanzulli
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - A Rampoldi
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - T Bignardi
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - E Porazzi
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC- Università Cattaneo, Corso Matteotti, 22, 21053, Catellanza, VA, Italy
| | - E Foglia
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC- Università Cattaneo, Corso Matteotti, 22, 21053, Catellanza, VA, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ferrario L, Schettini F, Avogaro A, Bellia C, Bertuzzi F, Bonetti G, Ceriello A, Ciaccio M, Corsi Romanelli M, Dozio E, Falqui L, Girelli A, Nicolucci A, Perseghin G, Plebani M, Valentini U, Zaninotto M, Castaldi S, Foglia E. Glycated Albumin for Glycemic Control in T2DM Population: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 13:453-464. [PMID: 34079308 PMCID: PMC8166313 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s304868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the glycated albumin (GA) introduction implications, as an add-on strategy to traditional glycemic control (Hb1Ac and fasting plasma glucose – FPG) instruments, considering insulin-naïve individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), treated with oral therapies. Methods A Health Technology Assessment was conducted in Italy, as a multi-dimensional approach useful to validate any innovative technology. The HTA dimensions, derived from the EUnetHTA Core Model, were deployed by means of literature evidence, health economics tools and qualitative questionnaires, filled-in by 15 professionals. Results Literature stated that the GA introduction could lead to a higher number of individuals achieving therapeutic success after 3 months of therapy (97.0% vs 71.6% without GA). From an economic point of view, considering a projection of 1,955,447 T2DM insulin-naïve individuals, potentially treated with oral therapy, GA introduction would imply fewer individuals requiring a therapy switch (−89.44%), with a 1.06% in costs reduction, on annual basis, thus being also the preferable solution from a cost-effectiveness perspective (cost-effectiveness value: 237.74 vs 325.53). According to experts opinions, lower perceptions on GA emerged with regard to equity aspects (0.13 vs 0.72, p-value>0.05), whereas it would improve both individuals (2.17 vs 1.33, p-value=0.000) and caregivers quality of life (1.50 vs 0.83, p-value=0.000). Even if in the short term, GA required additional investments in training courses (−0.80 vs 0.10, p-value = 0.036), in the long run, GA could become the preferable technology (0.30 vs 0.01, p-value=0.018) from an organisational perspective. Conclusion Adding GA to traditional glycaemic control instruments could improve the clinical pathway of individuals with T2DM, leading to economic and organisational advantages for both hospitals and National Healthcare Systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucrezia Ferrario
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Schettini
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Angelo Avogaro
- Department of Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Chiara Bellia
- Section of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Medicine, Department of Biopathology and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Federico Bertuzzi
- Diabetology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Ceriello
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases, Multimedica Research Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marcello Ciaccio
- Section of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Medicine, Department of Biopathology and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Corsi Romanelli
- Service of Laboratory Medicine 1-Clinical Pathology, Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Dozio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Falqui
- Department of Medicine, Diabetes and Endocrinology, Multimedica Research Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Angela Girelli
- Diabetes Care Unit, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonio Nicolucci
- Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy
| | - Gianluca Perseghin
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Rehabilitation, Unit of Metabolic Medicine, Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Mario Plebani
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Martina Zaninotto
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Silvana Castaldi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Research Institute of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Emanuela Foglia
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC, Castellanza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vettoretto N, Foglia E, Ferrario L, Gerardi C, Molteni B, Nocco U, Lettieri E, Molfino S, Baiocchi GL, Elmore U, Rosati R, Currò G, Cassinotti E, Boni L, Cirocchi R, Marano A, Petz WL, Arezzo A, Bonino MA, Davini F, Biondi A, Anania G, Agresta F, Silecchia G. Could fluorescence-guided surgery be an efficient and sustainable option? A SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery) health technology assessment summary. Surg Endosc 2021; 34:3270-3284. [PMID: 32274626 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07542-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indocyanine green fluorescence vision is an upcoming technology in surgery. It can be used in three ways: angiographic and biliary tree visualization and lymphatic spreading studies. The present paper shows the most outstanding results from an health technology assessment study design, conducted on fluorescence-guided compared with standard vision surgery. METHODS A health technology assessment approach was implemented to investigate the economic, social, ethical, and organizational implications related to the adoption of the innovative fluorescence-guided view, with a focus on minimally invasive approach. With the support of a multidisciplinary team, qualitative and quantitative data were collected, by means of literature evidence, validated questionnaires and self-reported interviews, considering the dimensions resulting from the EUnetHTA Core Model. RESULTS From a systematic search of literature, we retrieved the following studies: 6 on hepatic, 1 on pancreatic, 4 on biliary, 2 on bariatric, 4 on endocrine, 2 on thoracic, 11 on colorectal, 7 on urology, 11 on gynecology, 2 on gastric surgery. Fluorescence guide has shown advantages on the length of hospitalization particularly in colorectal surgery, with a reduction of the rate of leakages and re-do anastomoses, in spite of a slight increase in operating time, and is confirmed to be a safe, efficacious, and sustainable vision technology. Clinical applications are still presenting a low evidence in the literature. CONCLUSION The present paper, under the patronage of Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery, based on an HTA approach, sustains the use of fluorescence-guided vision in minimally invasive surgery, in the fields of general, gynecologic, urologic, and thoracic surgery, as an efficient and economically sustainable technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Vettoretto
- Chirurgia Montichiari, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Degli Spedali Civili, V.le Ciotti 154, Montichiari, 25018, Brescia, Italy.
| | - E Foglia
- LIUC - Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - L Ferrario
- LIUC - Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - C Gerardi
- Centro di Politiche Regolatorie, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri" IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - B Molteni
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - U Nocco
- Ingegneria Clinica, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale dei Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy
| | - E Lettieri
- School of Management, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico, Milano, Italy
| | - S Molfino
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - G L Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - U Elmore
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - R Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - G Currò
- Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - E Cassinotti
- Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione IRCCS - Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico - University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - L Boni
- Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione IRCCS - Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico - University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - R Cirocchi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - A Marano
- Chirurgia Generale ed Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - W L Petz
- Chirurgia, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - M A Bonino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - F Davini
- Centro multidisciplinare Chirurgia Robotica, Chirurgia Toracica mini-invasiva e Robotica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Biondi
- Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Anania
- Chirurgia Generale, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - F Agresta
- Chirurgia Generale, Azienda ULSS 5 "Polesana", Hospital of Adria, Adria, RO, Italy
| | - G Silecchia
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Seixas BV, Regier DA, Bryan S, Mitton C. Describing practices of priority setting and resource allocation in publicly funded health care systems of high-income countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:90. [PMID: 33499854 PMCID: PMC7839200 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06078-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare spending has grown over the last decades in all developed countries. Making hard choices for investments in a rational, evidence-informed, systematic, transparent and legitimate manner constitutes an important objective. Yet, most scientific work in this area has focused on developing/improving prescriptive approaches for decision making and presenting case studies. The present work aimed to describe existing practices of priority setting and resource allocation (PSRA) within the context of publicly funded health care systems of high-income countries and inform areas for further improvement and research. METHODS An online qualitative survey, developed from a theoretical framework, was administered with decision-makers and academics from 18 countries. 450 individuals were invited and 58 participated (13% of response rate). RESULTS We found evidence that resource allocation is still largely carried out based on historical patterns and through ad hoc decisions, despite the widely held understanding that decisions should be based on multiple explicit criteria. Health technology assessment (HTA) was the tool most commonly indicated by respondents as a formal priority setting strategy. Several approaches were reported to have been used, with special emphasis on Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA), but limited evidence exists on their evaluation and routine use. Disinvestment frameworks are still very rare. There is increasing convergence on the use of multiple types of evidence to judge the value of investment options. CONCLUSIONS Efforts to establish formal and explicit processes and rationales for decision-making in priority setting and resource allocation have been still rare outside the HTA realm. Our work indicates the need of development/improvement of decision-making frameworks in PSRA that: 1) have well-defined steps; 2) are based on multiple criteria; 3) are capable of assessing the opportunity costs involved; 4) focus on achieving higher value and not just on adoption; 5) engage involved stakeholders and the general public; 6) make good use and appraisal of all evidence available; and 6) emphasize transparency, legitimacy, and fairness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brayan V Seixas
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), USA.
| | - Dean A Regier
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer and the Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (ARCC), Vancouver, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada
| | - Stirling Bryan
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Craig Mitton
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Seixas BV, Dionne F, Mitton C. Practices of decision making in priority setting and resource allocation: a scoping review and narrative synthesis of existing frameworks. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2021; 11:2. [PMID: 33411161 PMCID: PMC7789400 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-020-00300-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to growing expenditures, health systems have been pushed to improve decision-making practices on resource allocation. This study aimed to identify which practices of priority setting and resource allocation (PSRA) have been used in healthcare systems of high-income countries. METHODS A scoping literature review (2007-2019) was conducted to map empirical PSRA activities. A two-stage screening process was utilized to identify existing approaches and cluster similar frameworks. That was complemented with a gray literature and horizontal scanning. A narrative synthesis was carried out to make sense of the existing literature and current state of PSRA practices in healthcare. RESULTS One thousand five hundred eighty five references were found in the peer-reviewed literature and 25 papers were selected for full-review. We identified three major types of decision-making framework in PSRA: 1) Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA); 2) Health Technology Assessment (HTA); and 3) Multiple-criteria value assessment. Our narrative synthesis indicates these formal frameworks of priority setting and resource allocation have been mostly implemented in episodic exercises with poor follow-up and evaluation. There seems to be growing interest for explicit robust rationales and ample stakeholder involvement, but that has not been the norm in the process of allocating resources within healthcare systems of high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS No single dominate framework for PSRA appeared as the preferred approach across jurisdictions, but common elements exist both in terms of process and structure. Decision-makers worldwide can draw on our work in designing and implementing PSRA processes in their contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brayan V. Seixas
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, USA
| | | | - Craig Mitton
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Seixas BV, Mitton C. Using a Formal Strategy of Priority Setting to Mitigate Austerity Effects Through Gains in Value: The Role of Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) in the Brazilian Public Healthcare System. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2021; 19:9-15. [PMID: 32468409 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00591-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The fiscal regime implemented in Brazil with the constitutional amendment 95 (EC-95) of December 2016 froze primary expenditures for 20 years, including healthcare spending. Previous studies have estimated strong negative effects of this policy on the health of Brazilians. Although there has been a constant pressure to repeal EC-95, this policy is unlikely to be changed in the near future. Thus, there is also a need to take actions within its own terms in order to mitigate its harmful consequences on population health. Shedding light on the existing evidence about the impact of austerity on health, the present work discusses how decision-makers can use a formal framework of decision making in priority setting and resource allocation to tackle the amplified budgetary strain. Drawing on principles of Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA), efficiency can be improved by shifting spending from low-value to higher-value areas, avoiding the "across-the-board cut" caused by non-differential consideration of expenditures in a context of mismatched growth of demand and supply of healthcare. By evaluating opportunity costs of investment and disinvestment proposals on the basis of multiple criteria and marginal analysis, the Brazilian public healthcare system could obtain gains in value, achieving better performance and attenuating the relative decline in spending on health brought by an austerity scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brayan V Seixas
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- UCLA Center for Health Policy Research (CHPR), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Craig Mitton
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
HTA and HIV: The Case of Dual NRTI Backbones in the Italian Setting. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17239010. [PMID: 33287274 PMCID: PMC7729444 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17239010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to analyze the potential advantages of emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (FTC/TAF) introduction, creating evidence-based information to orient strategies to reduce costs, thus preserving effectiveness and appropriateness. An Health Technology Assessment (HTA) was implemented in the years 2017–2018 comparing the dual backbones available in the Italian market: FTC/TAF, FTC/TDF (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine) and ABC/3TC (abacavir/lamivudine). From an efficacy point of view, FTC/TAF ensured a higher percentage of virologic control and a better safety impact than FTC/TDF (improving the renal and bone safety profile, as well as the lipid picture). From an economic point of view, the results revealed a 4% cost saving for the Italian National Healthcare Service NHS with FTC/TAF introduction compared with the baseline scenario. Qualitative perceptions’ results showed that FTC/TAF would decrease the burden of adverse events management, increasing the accessibility of patients to healthcare providers (FTC/TAF: 0.95, FTC/TDF: 0.10, ABC/3TC: 0.28; p-value: 0.016) and social costs (FTC/TDF: −0.23, FTC/TAF: 1.04, ABC/3TC: 0.23; p-value < 0.001), improving patient quality of life (FTC/TDF: 0.31, FTC/TAF: 1.85, ABC/3TC: 0.38; p-value < 0.001). Healthcare services may consider the evidence provided by the present study as an opportunity to include HIV patients in a more adequate antiretroviral treatment arm, guaranteeing a personalized clinical pathway, thus becoming more efficient and effective over time.
Collapse
|
17
|
Embrett M, Randall GE, Lavis JN, Dion ML. Conceptualising characteristics of resources withdrawal from medical services: a systematic qualitative synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:123. [PMID: 33115486 PMCID: PMC7592573 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00630-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Terms used to describe government-led resource withdrawal from ineffective and unsafe medical services, including 'rationing' and 'disinvestment', have tended to be used interchangeably, despite having distinct characteristics. This lack of descriptive precision for arguably distinct terms contributes to the obscurity that hinders effective communication and the achievement of evidence-based decision-making. The objectives of this study are to (1) identify the various terms used to describe resource withdrawal and (2) propose definitions for the key or foundational terms, which includes a clear description of the unique characteristics of each. METHODS This is a systematic qualitative synthesis of characteristics and terms found through a search of the academic and grey literature. This approach involved identifying commonly used resource withdrawal terms, extracting data about resource withdrawal characteristics associated with each term and conducting a comparative analysis by categorising elements as antecedents, attributes or outcomes. RESULTS Findings from an analysis of 106 documents demonstrated that terms used to describe resource withdrawal are inconsistently defined and applied. The characteristics associated with these terms, mainly antecedents and attributes, are used interchangeably by many authors but are differentiated by others. Our analysis resulted in the development of a framework that organises these characteristics to demonstrate the unique attributes associated with each term. To enhance precision, these terms were classified as either policy options or patient health outcomes and refined definitions for rationing and disinvestment were developed. Rationing was defined as resource withdrawal that denies, on average, patient health benefits. Disinvestment was defined as resource withdrawal that results in, on average, improved or no change in health benefits. CONCLUSION Agreement on the definition of various resource withdrawal terms and their key characteristics is required for transparent government decision-making regarding medical service withdrawal. This systematic qualitative synthesis presents the proposed definitions of resource withdrawal terms that will promote consistency, benefit public policy dialogue and enhance the policy-making process for health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Embrett
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing, Dalhouise University, 5869 University Avenue, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada. .,St. Francis Xavier University, 4130 University Avenue, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, B2G2W5, Canada.
| | - Glen E Randall
- Health Policy and Management, DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S4M4, Canada.,McMaster University, DSB-229, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4M4, Canada
| | - John N Lavis
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S4L6, Canada.,McMaster Health Forum, MML-417, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S4L6, Canada
| | - Michelle L Dion
- Department of Political Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S4L6, Canada.,Kenneth Taylor Hall (KTH) 533, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S4L6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
FERRARIO LUCREZIA, FOGLIA EMANUELA, GARAGIOLA ELISABETTA, PACELLI VALERIA, CENDERELLO GIOVANNI, DI BIAGIO ANTONIO, RIZZARDINI GIULIANO, ERRICO MARGHERITA, IARDINO ROSARIA, CROCE DAVIDE. The impact of PrEP: results from a multicenter Health Technology Assessment into the Italian setting. JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 2020; 61:E451-E463. [PMID: 33150233 PMCID: PMC7595079 DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2020.61.3.1352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of oral tenofovir/emtricitabine (FTC/TDF) for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among high-risk people without Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), is emerging as an innovative strategy to decrease HIV epidemic. The study aims at evaluating the implications related to PrEP introduction, from a multidimensional point of view, as required by Health Technology Assessment (HTA) approach, with a particular attention on sustainability and social factors, influencing PrEP implementation. METHODS An analysis was conducted involving 35 Italian Infectious Disease Departments. The introduction of PrEP (applied both as "add-on" and "substitute" prevention strategy) into the clinical practice was compared with a baseline scenario, consisting of condoms among men who have sex with men, and serodiscordant couples, and the use of Needle Syringe Programme among injection drugs users The above scenarios were analysed by means of a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) approach. The 9 EUnetHTA Core Model domains were assessed through comparative information, retrieved from literature evidence, and collection of qualitative and quantitative information, derived from real-world evidence, in particular from 35 Infectious Disease Departments and potential PrEP' users involved. A final multi-criteria decision analysis approach (MCDA) was implemented to simulate the appraisal phase and providing evidence-based information with regard to the preferable technology. RESULTS Despite the improvement in patients' quality of life, PrEP would generate the development of other sexually transmitted and blood-borne diseases, with a consequent decrease of patients' safety in case of PrEP applied as a "substitute" prevention strategy. In addition, PrEP would generate an increase in staff workflow, with investment in medical supplies and training courses. PrEP would lead to significant economic investments both for the NHS (+40%), and for citizens (+2,377%) if used as an add-on strategy, assuming FTC/TDF patent cost. With the off-patent drug, the NHS would benefit from an advantage (37%), and a shrink of the patients' expenditure emerged (+682%). More economic resources are required if PrEP is applied as a substitute strategy, considering both the patent (NHS: 212%; citizens: 3,423%) and the off-patent drug (NHS: 73%; citizens: 1,077%). Conclusions. The most cost-containing strategy would be the use of PrEP, as an add-on strategy, with a consequent improvement in patients' safety, even if drug-related adverse events would be considered. The implementation of the off-patent drug would decrease the economic burden of the innovative prevention strategy. Hence, the organizational aspects related to its adoption would be deeply investigated, with the potential opportunity to create specific ambulatories devoted to PrEP users' especially for medium and big size hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LUCREZIA FERRARIO
- MEcon, Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC-Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, Italy
| | - EMANUELA FOGLIA
- MEcon, Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC-Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, Italy
| | - ELISABETTA GARAGIOLA
- MEcon, Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC-Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, Italy
| | - VALERIA PACELLI
- MEcon, Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC-Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, Italy
| | - GIOVANNI CENDERELLO
- Galliera Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Genova, Italy - ASL-1 Imperiese Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Sanremo, Italy
| | - ANTONIO DI BIAGIO
- Policlinico San Martino Hospital, Unit of Infectious Diseases, Genova, Italy
| | - GIULIANO RIZZARDINI
- Fatebenefratelli Sacco Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Milan, Italy - School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | | | - DAVIDE CROCE
- MEng, Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC-Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, Italy - School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vanni F, Foglia E, Pennestrì F, Ferrario L, Banfi G. Introducing enhanced recovery after surgery in a high-volume orthopaedic hospital: a health technology assessment. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:773. [PMID: 32829712 PMCID: PMC7444253 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05634-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of patients undergoing joint arthroplasty is increasing worldwide. An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway for hip and knee arthroplasty was introduced in an Italian high-volume research hospital in March 2018. METHODS The aim of this mixed methods observational study is to perform a health technology assessment (HTA) of the ERAS pathway, considering 938 procedures performed after its implementation, by means of a hospital-based approach derived from the EUnetHTA (European Network for Health Technology Assessment) Core Model. The assessment process is based on dimensions of general relevance, safety, efficacy, effectiveness, economic and financial impact, equity, legal aspects, social and ethical impact, and organizational impact. A narrative review of the literature helped to identify general relevance, safety and efficacy factors, and a set of relevant sub-dimensions submitted to the evaluation of the professionals who use the technology through a 7-item Likert Scale. The economic and financial impact of the ERAS pathway on the hospital budget was supported by quantitative data collected from internal or national registries, employing economic modelling strategies to identify the amount of resources required to implement it. RESULTS The relevance of technology under assessment is recognized worldwide. A number of studies show accelerated pathways to dominate conventional approaches on pain reduction, functional recovery, prevention of complications, improvements in tolerability and quality of life, including fragile or vulnerable patients. Qualitative surveys on clinical and functional outcomes confirm most of these benefits. The ERAS pathway is associated with a reduced length of stay in comparison with the Italian hospitalization average for the same procedures, despite the poor spread of the pathway within the country may generate postcode inequalities. The economic analyses show how the resources invested in training activities are largely depreciated by benefits once the technology is permanently introduced, which may generate hospital cost savings of up to 2054,123.44 € per year. CONCLUSIONS Galeazzi Hospital's ERAS pathway for hip and knee arthroplasty results preferable to traditional approaches following most of the HTA dimensions, and offers room for further improvement. The more comparable practices are shared, the before this potential improvement can be identified and addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Vanni
- IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Foglia
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC Business School, LIUC - Università Cattaneo, Corso Matteotti 22, 21053, Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Federico Pennestrì
- IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
| | - Lucrezia Ferrario
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC Business School, LIUC - Università Cattaneo, Corso Matteotti 22, 21053, Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Banfi
- IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Moes F, Houwaart E, Delnoij D, Horstman K. Collective constructions of 'waste': epistemic practices for disinvestment in the context of Dutch social health insurance. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:633. [PMID: 31488152 PMCID: PMC6727536 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4434-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Faced with growing budget pressure, policymakers worldwide recognize the necessity of strategic disinvestment from ineffective, inefficient or harmful medical practices. However, disinvestment programs face substantial social, political and cultural challenges: mistrust, struggles for clinical autonomy or stakeholders’ reluctance to engage in what can be perceived as ‘rationing’. Academic literature says little about effective strategies to address these challenges. This paper provides insights on this matter. We analyzed the epistemic work of a group of policymakers at the National Health Care Institute on what was initially a disinvestment initiative within the context of the Dutch basic benefits package: the ‘Appropriate Care’ program. The Institute developed a strategy using national administrative data to identify and tackle low-value care covered from public funds as well as potential underuse, and achieve savings through improved organization of efficiency and quality in health care delivery. How did the Institute deal with the socio-political sensitivities associated with disinvestment by means of their epistemic work? Method We conducted ethnographic research into the National Health Care Institute’s epistemic practices. Research entailed document analysis, non-participant observation, in-depth conversations, and interviews with key-informants. Results The Institute dealt with the socio-political sensitivities associated with disinvestment by democratizing the epistemic practices to identify low-value care, by warranting data analysis by clinical experts, by creating an epistemic safe space for health care professionals who were the object of research into low-value care, and by de-emphasizing the economization measure. Ultimately, this epistemic work facilitated a collaborative construction of problems relating to low-value care practices and their solutions. Conclusions This case shows that – apart from the right data and adequate expertise – disinvestment requires clinical leadership and political will on the part of stakeholders. Our analysis of the Institute’s Appropriate Care program shows how the epistemic effort to identify low-value care became a co-construction between policymakers, care providers, patients and insurers of problems of ‘waste’ in Dutch social health insurance. This collective epistemic work gave cognitive, moral and political standing to the idea of ‘waste’ in public health expenditure. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4434-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floortje Moes
- Research School CAPHRI, Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Eddy Houwaart
- Research School CAPHRI, Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Diana Delnoij
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,National Health Care Institute, P.O. Box 320, 1110 AH, Diemen, the Netherlands
| | - Klasien Horstman
- Research School CAPHRI, Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Seixas BV, Dionne F, Conte T, Mitton C. Assessing value in health care: using an interpretive classification system to understand existing practices based on a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:560. [PMID: 31409369 PMCID: PMC6693163 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4405-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementing adequate strategies to assess the value of health services plays a central role in the effort to deal with the financial pressures faced by health care systems worldwide. This study aimed to understand which approaches to value assessment have been used in developed countries. METHODS We conducted a rapid review and a gray literature search to identify value assessment frameworks. A two-stage screening process was utilized to identify existing approaches and cluster similar frameworks. In addition, we developed an interpretive classification system to make sense of existing approaches. RESULTS One thousand one hundred seventy-six references were identified and 38 papers were selected for full-review. Among these 38 articles, 22 distinct approaches to assess value of health care interventions were identified and classified according to four points: 1) use of single or multiple considerations to base value estimates; 2) use of disease-specific or generic criteria; 3) reliance on process-based or outcomes-based consideration; and 4) type of input and evidence considered. CONCLUSIONS The contextual nature of value assessment in health care becomes evident with the diversity of existing approaches. Despite the predominance of cases relying on the Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio as the measure of value, this approach has not been sufficient to meet the needs of decision-makers. The use of multiple criteria has become more and more important, as well as the consideration of patient-reported measures. Considerations of costs are not always explicit and consistent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brayan V Seixas
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, USA.
| | | | - Tania Conte
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Craig Mitton
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cutti AG, Lettieri E, Verni G. Health Technology Assessment as Theoretical Framework to Assess Lower-Limb Prosthetics—Issues and Opportunities from an International Perspective. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1097/jpo.0000000000000235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
23
|
Criteria-Based Resource Allocation: A Tool to Improve Public Health Impact. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2018; 22:E14-20. [PMID: 26247802 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000000319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Resource allocation in local public health (LPH) has been reported as a significant challenge for practitioners and a Public Health Services and Systems Research priority. Ensuring available resources have maximum impact on community health and maintaining public confidence in the resource allocation process are key challenges. A popular strategy in health care settings to address these challenges is Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA). This case study used PBMA in an LPH setting to examine its appropriateness and utility. DESIGN The criteria-based resource allocation process PBMA was implemented to guide the development of annual organizational budget in an attempt to maximize the impact of agency resources. Senior leaders and managers were surveyed postimplementation regarding process facilitators, challenges, and successes. SETTING Canada's largest autonomous LPH agency. RESULTS PBMA was used to shift 3.4% of the agency budget from lower-impact areas (through 34 specific disinvestments) to higher-impact areas (26 specific reinvestments). Senior leaders and managers validated the process as a useful approach for improving the public health impact of agency resources. However, they also reported the process may have decreased frontline staff confidence in senior leadership. CONCLUSIONS In this case study, PBMA was used successfully to reallocate a sizable portion of an LPH agency's budget toward higher-impact activities. PBMA warrants further study as a tool to support optimal resource allocation in LPH settings.
Collapse
|
24
|
Raftery J, Hanney S, Greenhalgh T, Glover M, Blatch-Jones A. Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment programme. Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-254. [PMID: 27767013 DOI: 10.3310/hta20760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This report reviews approaches and tools for measuring the impact of research programmes, building on, and extending, a 2007 review. OBJECTIVES (1) To identify the range of theoretical models and empirical approaches for measuring the impact of health research programmes; (2) to develop a taxonomy of models and approaches; (3) to summarise the evidence on the application and use of these models; and (4) to evaluate the different options for the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme. DATA SOURCES We searched databases including Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and The Cochrane Library from January 2005 to August 2014. REVIEW METHODS This narrative systematic literature review comprised an update, extension and analysis/discussion. We systematically searched eight databases, supplemented by personal knowledge, in August 2014 through to March 2015. RESULTS The literature on impact assessment has much expanded. The Payback Framework, with adaptations, remains the most widely used approach. It draws on different philosophical traditions, enhancing an underlying logic model with an interpretative case study element and attention to context. Besides the logic model, other ideal type approaches included constructionist, realist, critical and performative. Most models in practice drew pragmatically on elements of several ideal types. Monetisation of impact, an increasingly popular approach, shows a high return from research but relies heavily on assumptions about the extent to which health gains depend on research. Despite usually requiring systematic reviews before funding trials, the HTA programme does not routinely examine the impact of those trials on subsequent systematic reviews. The York/Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation toolkits provide ways of assessing such impact, but need to be evaluated. The literature, as reviewed here, provides very few instances of a randomised trial playing a major role in stopping the use of a new technology. The few trials funded by the HTA programme that may have played such a role were outliers. DISCUSSION The findings of this review support the continued use of the Payback Framework by the HTA programme. Changes in the structure of the NHS, the development of NHS England and changes in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's remit pose new challenges for identifying and meeting current and future research needs. Future assessments of the impact of the HTA programme will have to take account of wider changes, especially as the Research Excellence Framework (REF), which assesses the quality of universities' research, seems likely to continue to rely on case studies to measure impact. The HTA programme should consider how the format and selection of case studies might be improved to aid more systematic assessment. The selection of case studies, such as in the REF, but also more generally, tends to be biased towards high-impact rather than low-impact stories. Experience for other industries indicate that much can be learnt from the latter. The adoption of researchfish® (researchfish Ltd, Cambridge, UK) by most major UK research funders has implications for future assessments of impact. Although the routine capture of indexed research publications has merit, the degree to which researchfish will succeed in collecting other, non-indexed outputs and activities remains to be established. LIMITATIONS There were limitations in how far we could address challenges that faced us as we extended the focus beyond that of the 2007 review, and well beyond a narrow focus just on the HTA programme. CONCLUSIONS Research funders can benefit from continuing to monitor and evaluate the impacts of the studies they fund. They should also review the contribution of case studies and expand work on linking trials to meta-analyses and to guidelines. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research HTA programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Raftery
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Steve Hanney
- Health Economics Research Group (HERG), Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Trish Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew Glover
- Health Economics Research Group (HERG), Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Amanda Blatch-Jones
- Wessex Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Involving citizens in disinvestment decisions: what do health professionals think? Findings from a multi-method study in the English NHS. HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW 2017; 13:162-188. [DOI: 10.1017/s1744133117000330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractPublic involvement in disinvestment decision making in health care is widely advocated, and in some cases legally mandated. However, attempts to involve the public in other areas of health policy have been accused of tokenism and manipulation. This paper presents research into the views of local health care leaders in the English National Health Service (NHS) with regards to the involvement of citizens and local communities in disinvestment decision making. The research includes a Q study and follow-up interviews with a sample of health care clinicians and managers in senior roles in the English NHS. It finds that whilst initial responses suggest high levels of support for public involvement, further probing of attitudes and experiences shows higher levels of ambivalence and risk aversion and a far more cautious overall stance. This study has implications for the future of disinvestment activities and public involvement in health care systems faced with increased resource constraint. Recommendations are made for future research and practice.
Collapse
|
26
|
STATUS OF DISINVESTMENT INITIATIVES IN LATIN AMERICA: RESULTS FROM A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND A QUESTIONNAIRE. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2017; 33:674-680. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462317000812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Disinvestment of existing healthcare technologies that deliver low or no health benefit for their cost can be used as a tool to improve access to effective technologies, while ensuring the long-term sustainability of healthcare systems. The objective of this research was to identify disinvestment initiatives in Latin American countries (LAC).Methods: First, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted. In February 2015, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and LILACS were searched for relevant journal articles, including terms related to “disinvestment,” “reallocation,” “obsolete technologies,” and “Latin America.” Additionally, a manual search of documents from Latin American health technology assessment agencies was performed. Second, an online questionnaire was sent to experts in LAC to assess whether unpublished real-life disinvestment initiatives exist. Questionnaire results were collected in September 2015.Results: From the SLR, 350 records were selected for screening following de-duplication and eleven articles fulfilled inclusion criteria. Only two of these reported information on initiatives potentially identifiable as disinvestment-investment activities in Brazil and Peru. Nine respondents completed the questionnaire, and four reported that disinvestment initiatives had been conducted in their respective organizations in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. This lack of agreement between the SLR and the questionnaire responses shows that disinvestment initiatives are ongoing, despite being under reported.Conclusions: Many challenges need to be overcome for a disinvestment initiative to be successful, and sharing particular experiences with the international community would increase the chances of positive outcomes. The present study highlights the need for publication of such experiences in LAC.
Collapse
|
27
|
Harris C, Green S, Ramsey W, Allen K, King R. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 9: conceptualising disinvestment in the local healthcare setting. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:633. [PMID: 28886735 PMCID: PMC5591535 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2507-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is the ninth in a series of papers reporting a program of Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) in a local healthcare setting. The disinvestment literature has broadened considerably over the past decade; however there is a significant gap regarding systematic, integrated, organisation-wide approaches. This debate paper presents a discussion of the conceptual aspects of disinvestment from the local perspective. DISCUSSION Four themes are discussed: Terminology and concepts, Motivation and purpose, Relationships with other healthcare improvement paradigms, and Challenges to disinvestment. There are multiple definitions for disinvestment, multiple concepts underpin the definitions and multiple alternative terms convey these concepts; some definitions overlap and some are mutually exclusive; and there are systematic discrepancies in use between the research and practice settings. Many authors suggest that the term 'disinvestment' should be avoided due to perceived negative connotations and propose that the concept be considered alongside investment in the context of all resource allocation decisions and approached from the perspective of optimising health care. This may provide motivation for change, reduce disincentives and avoid some of the ethical dilemmas inherent in other disinvestment approaches. The impetus and rationale for disinvestment activities are likely to affect all aspects of the process from identification and prioritisation through to implementation and evaluation but have not been widely discussed. A need for mechanisms, frameworks, methods and tools for disinvestment is reported. However there are several health improvement paradigms with mature frameworks and validated methods and tools that are widely-used and well-accepted in local health services that already undertake disinvestment-type activities and could be expanded and built upon. The nature of disinvestment brings some particular challenges for policy-makers, managers, health professionals and researchers. There is little evidence of successful implementation of 'disinvestment' projects in the local setting, however initiatives to remove or replace technologies and practices have been successfully achieved through evidence-based practice, quality and safety activities, and health service improvement programs. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that the construct of 'disinvestment' may be problematic at the local level. A new definition and two potential approaches to disinvestment are proposed to stimulate further research and discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Harris
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Clinical Effectiveness, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sally Green
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Wayne Ramsey
- Medical Services and Quality, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kelly Allen
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Clinical Effectiveness, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Richard King
- Medicine Program, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
How have systematic priority setting approaches influenced policy making? A synthesis of the current literature. Health Policy 2017; 121:937-946. [PMID: 28734682 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2016] [Revised: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a growing body of literature on systematic approaches to healthcare priority setting from various countries and different levels of decision making. This paper synthesizes the current literature in order to assess the extent to which program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA), burden of disease & cost-effectiveness analysis (BOD/CEA), multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), and accountability for reasonableness (A4R), are reported to have been institutionalized and influenced policy making and practice. METHODS We searched for English language publications on health care priority setting approaches (2000-2017). Our sources of literature included PubMed and Ovid databases (including Embase, Global Health, Medline, PsycINFO, EconLit). FINDINGS Of the four approaches PBMA and A4R were commonly applied in high income countries while BOD/CEA was exclusively applied in low income countries. PBMA and BOD/CEA were most commonly reported to have influenced policy making. The explanations for limited adoption of an approach were related to its complexity, poor policy maker understanding and resource requirements. CONCLUSIONS While systematic approaches have the potential to improve healthcare priority setting; most have not been adopted in routine policy making. The identified barriers call for sustained knowledge exchange between researchers and policy-makers and development of practical guidelines to ensure that these frameworks are more accessible, applicable and sustainable in informing policy making.
Collapse
|
29
|
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY DISINVESTMENT WORLDWIDE: OVERVIEW OF PROGRAMS AND POSSIBLE DETERMINANTS. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2017; 33:239-250. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462317000514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Objectives:In the past decade, there has been a growing interest in health technology disinvestment. A disinvestment process should involve all relevant stakeholders to identify and deliver the most effective, safe, and cost-effective healthcare interventions. The aim of the present study was to describe the state of the art of health technology disinvestment around the world and to identify parameters that could be associated with the implementation of disinvestment programs.Methods:A systematic review of the literature was performed from database inception to November 2014, together with the collection of original data on socio-economic indicators from forty countries.Results:Overall, 1,456 records (1,199 from electronic databases and 257 from other sources) were initially retrieved. After analyzing 172 full text articles, 38 papers describing fifteen disinvestment programs/experiences in eight countries were included. The majority (12/15) of disinvestment programs began after 2006. As expected, these programs were more common in developed countries, 63 percent of which had a Beveridge model healthcare system. The univariate analysis showed that countries with disinvestment programs had a significantly higher level of Human Development Index, Gross Domestic Product per capita, public expenditure on health and social services, life expectancy at birth and a lower level of infant mortality rate, and of perceived corruption. The existence of HTA agencies in the country was a strong predictor (p= .034) for the development of disinvestment programs.Conclusions:The most significant variables in the univariate analysis were connected by a common factor, potentially related to the overall development stage of the country.
Collapse
|
30
|
Williams I, Harlock J, Robert G, Mannion R, Brearley S, Hall K. Decommissioning health care: identifying best practice through primary and secondary research – a prospective mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2017. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr05220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundDecommissioning – defined as the planned process of removing, reducing or replacing health-care services – is an important component of current reforms in the NHS. However, the evidence base on which to guide policy and practice in this area is weak.AimThis study aims to formulate theoretically grounded, evidence-informed guidance to support best practice in effective decommissioning of NHS services.DesignThe overall approach is a sequential, multimethod research design. The study involves (1) a literature synthesis summarising what is known about decommissioning, an international expert Delphi study, 12 interviews with national/regional bodies and seven narrative vignettes from NHS leaders; (2) a survey of Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England (n = 56/211, 27%); (3) longitudinal, prospective case studies of four purposively sampled decommissioning projects comprising 59 semistructured interviews, 18 non-participant observations and documentary analysis; and (4) research with citizens, patient/service user representatives, carers, third-sector organisations and local community groups, including three focus groups (30 participants) and a second Delphi study (26 participants). The study took place over the period 2013–16.SettingThe English NHS.ResultsThere is a lack of robust evidence to guide decommissioning, but among experts there is a high level of consensus for the following good-practice principles: establish a strong leadership team, engage clinical leaders from an early stage and establish a clear rationale for change. The most common type of CCG decommissioning activity was ‘relocation or replacement of a service from an acute to a community setting’ (28% of all activities) and the majority of responding CCGs (77%) were planning to decommission services. Case studies demonstrate the need to (1) draw on evidence, reviews and policies to frame the problem; (2) build alliances in order to legitimise decommissioning as a solution; (3) seek wider acceptance, including among patients and community groups, of decommissioning; and (4) devise implementation plans that recognise the additional challenges of removal and replacement. Citizens, patient/service user representatives, carers, third-sector organisations and local community groups were more likely to believe that decommissioning is driven by financial and political concerns than by considerations of service quality and efficiency, and to distrust and/or resent decision-makers. Overall, the study suggests that failure rates in decommissioning are likely to be higher than in other forms of service change, suggesting the need for tailored design and implementation approaches.LimitationsThere were few opportunities for patient and public engagement in early phases of the research; however, this was mitigated by the addition of work package 4. We were unable to track outcomes of decommissioning activities within the time scales of the project and the survey response rate was lower than anticipated.ConclusionsDecommissioning is shaped by change management and implementation, evidence and information, and relationships and politics. We propose an expanded understanding, encompassing organisational and political factors, of how avoidance of loss affects the delivery of decommissioning programmes. Future work should explore the relationships between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes in decommissioning, develop the understanding of how loss affects decisions and explore the long-term impact of decommissioning and its impact on patient care and outcomes.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iestyn Williams
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jenny Harlock
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Glenn Robert
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Russell Mannion
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sally Brearley
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Kelly Hall
- Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HOSPITALS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM AN EMPIRICAL EXPERIMENT. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2017; 33:288-296. [PMID: 28578752 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462317000356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hospital Based Health Technology Assessment (HBHTA) practices, to inform decision making at the hospital level, emerged as urgent priority for policy makers, hospital managers, and professionals. The present study crystallized the results achieved by the testing of an original framework for HBHTA, developed within Lombardy Region: the IMPlementation of A Quick hospital-based HTA (IMPAQHTA). The study tested: (i) the HBHTA framework efficiency, (ii) feasibility, (iii) the tool utility and completeness, considering dimensions and sub-dimensions. METHODS The IMPAQHTA framework deployed the Regional HTA program, activated in 2008 in Lombardy, at the hospital level. The relevance and feasibility of the framework were tested over a 3-year period through a large-scale empirical experiment, involving seventy-four healthcare professionals organized in different HBHTA teams for assessing thirty-two different technologies within twenty-two different hospitals. Semi-structured interviews and self-reported questionnaires were used to collect data regarding the relevance and feasibility of the IMPAQHTA framework. RESULTS The proposed HBHTA framework proved to be suitable for application at the hospital level, in the Italian context, permitting a quick assessment (11 working days) and providing hospital decision makers with relevant and quantitative information. Performances in terms of feasibility, utility, completeness, and easiness proved to be satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS The IMPAQHTA was considered to be a complete and feasible HBHTA framework, as well as being replicable to different technologies within any hospital settings, thus demonstrating the capability of a hospital to develop a complete HTA, if supported by adequate and well defined tools and quantitative metrics.
Collapse
|
32
|
Harris C, Allen K, King R, Ramsey W, Kelly C, Thiagarajan M. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 2: identifying opportunities for disinvestment in a local healthcare setting. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:328. [PMID: 28476159 PMCID: PMC5420107 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2211-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2016] [Accepted: 03/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This is the second in a series of papers reporting a program of Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) in a local healthcare setting. Rising healthcare costs, continuing advances in health technologies and recognition of ineffective practices and systematic waste are driving disinvestment of health technologies and clinical practices that offer little or no benefit in order to maximise outcomes from existing resources. However there is little information to guide regional health services or individual facilities in how they might approach disinvestment locally. This paper outlines the investigation of potential settings and methods for decision-making about disinvestment in the context of an Australian health service. Methods Methods include a literature review on the concepts and terminology relating to disinvestment, a survey of national and international researchers, and interviews and workshops with local informants. A conceptual framework was drafted and refined with stakeholder feedback. Results There is a lack of common terminology regarding definitions and concepts related to disinvestment and no guidance for an organisation-wide systematic approach to disinvestment in a local healthcare service. A summary of issues from the literature and respondents highlight the lack of theoretical knowledge and practical experience and provide a guide to the information required to develop future models or methods for disinvestment in the local context. A conceptual framework was developed. Three mechanisms that provide opportunities to introduce disinvestment decisions into health service systems and processes were identified. Presented in order of complexity, time to achieve outcomes and resources required they include 1) Explicit consideration of potential disinvestment in routine decision-making, 2) Proactive decision-making about disinvestment driven by available evidence from published research and local data, and 3) Specific exercises in priority setting and system redesign. Conclusion This framework identifies potential opportunities to initiate disinvestment activities in a systematic integrated approach that can be applied across a whole organisation using transparent, evidence-based methods. Incorporating considerations for disinvestment into existing decision-making systems and processes might be achieved quickly with minimal cost; however establishment of new systems requires research into appropriate methods and provision of appropriate skills and resources to deliver them. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2211-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Harris
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia. .,Centre for Clinical Effectiveness, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Kelly Allen
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Effectiveness, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard King
- Medicine Program, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wayne Ramsey
- Medical Services and Quality, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cate Kelly
- Medical Services, Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Malar Thiagarajan
- Ageing and Aged Care Branch, Department of Health and Human Services, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Greaves Z, McCafferty S. Health and wellbeing boards: public health decision making bodies or political pawns? Public Health 2016; 143:78-84. [PMID: 28159030 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Revised: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health and Wellbeing boards in England are uniquely constituted; embedded in the local authorities with membership drawn from a range of stakeholders and partner organizations. This raises the question of how decision making functions of the boards reflects wider public health decision making, if criteria are applied to decision making, and what prioritization processes, if any, are used. METHODS Qualitative research methods were employed and five local boards were approached, interview dyads were conducted with the boards Chair and Director of Public Health across four of these (n = 4). Three questions were addressed: how are decisions made? What are the criteria applied to decision making? And how are criteria then prioritized? A thematic approach was used to analyse data identifying codes and extracting key themes. RESULTS Equity, effectiveness and consistency with strategies of board and partners were most consistently identified by participants as criteria influencing decisions. Prioritization was described as an engaged and collaborative process, but criteria were not explicitly referenced in the decision making of the boards which instead made unstructured prioritization of population sub-groups or interventions agreed by consensus. CONCLUSIONS Criteria identified are broadly consistent with those used in wider public health practice but additionally incorporated criteria which recognizes the political siting of the boards. The study explored the variety in different board's approaches to prioritization and identified a lack of clarity and rigour in the identification and use of criteria in prioritization processes. Decision making may benefit from the explicit inclusion of criteria in the prioritization process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Greaves
- Newcastle University, Institute of Health & Society, UK.
| | - S McCafferty
- Newcastle University, Institute of Health & Society, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Seo HJ, Park JJ, Lee SH. A systematic review on current status of health technology reassessment: insights for South Korea. Health Res Policy Syst 2016; 14:82. [PMID: 27835964 PMCID: PMC5106773 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-016-0152-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2016] [Accepted: 10/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To systematically investigate the current status and methodology of health technology reassessment (HTR) in various countries to draw insights for the healthcare system in South Korea. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted on the articles published between January 2000 and February 2015 on Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PubMed. The titles and abstracts of retrieved records were screened and selected by two independent reviewers. Data related to HTR were extracted using a pre-standardised form. The review was conducted using narrative synthesis to understand and summarise the HTR process and policies. RESULTS Forty five studies, conducted in seven countries, including the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Spain, Sweden, Denmark, and the United States of America, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Informed by the literature review, and complemented by informant interviews, we focused on HTR activities in four jurisdictions: the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Spain. There were similarities in the HTR processes, namely the use of existing health technology assessment agencies, reassessment candidate technology identification and priority setting, stakeholder involvement, support for reimbursement coverage, and implementation strategies. Considering the findings of the systematic review in the context of the domestic healthcare environment in Korea, an appropriate HTR model was developed. This model included four stages, those of identification, prioritisation, reassessment and decision. CONCLUSIONS Disinvestment and reinvestment through the HTR was used to increase the efficiency and quality of care to help patients receive optimal treatment. Based on the lessons learnt from other countries' experiences, Korea should make efforts to establish an HTR process that optimises the National Healthcare Insurance system through revision of the existing Medical Service Act.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun-Ju Seo
- Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.,National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Jeong Park
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seon Heui Lee
- Department of Nursing Science, College of Nursing, Gachon University, 191 Hambakmoero, Yeonsu-gu, 406-799, Incheon, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cumming JM. Priority Setting Meets Multiple Streams: A Match to Be Further Examined? Comment on "Introducing New Priority Setting and Resource Allocation Processes in a Canadian Healthcare Organization: A Case Study Analysis Informed by Multiple Streams Theory. Int J Health Policy Manag 2016; 5:497-499. [PMID: 27694663 DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
With demand for health services continuing to grow as populations age and new technologies emerge to meet health needs, healthcare policy-makers are under constant pressure to set priorities, ie, to make choices about the health services that can and cannot be funded within available resources. In a recent paper, Smith et al apply an influential policy studies framework - Kingdon's multiple streams approach (MSA) - to explore the factors that explain why one health service delivery organization adopted a formal priority setting framework (in the form of programme budgeting and marginal analysis [PBMA]) to assist it in making priority setting decisions. MSA is a theory of agenda-setting, ie, how it is that different issues do or do not reach a decision-making point. In this paper, I reflect on the use of the MSA framework to explore priority setting processes and how the framework might be applied to similar cases in future.
Collapse
|
36
|
Parrella A, Braunack-Mayer A, Collins J, Clarke M, Tooher R, Ratcliffe J, Marshall H. Prioritizing government funding of adolescent vaccinations: recommendations from young people on a citizens' jury. Vaccine 2016; 34:3592-7. [PMID: 27195757 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2016] [Revised: 05/04/2016] [Accepted: 05/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adolescents' views, and preferences are often over-looked when public health policies that affect them are designed and implemented. The purpose of this study was to describe young people's views and preferences for determining government funding priorities for adolescent immunization programs. METHODS In 2015 we conducted a youth jury in metropolitan Adelaide, South Australia to deliberate on the question "What criteria should we use to decide which vaccines for young people in Australia should receive public funding?" Fifteen youth aged 15-19 years participated in the jury. Jury members were recruited from the general community through a market research company using a stratified sampling technique. RESULTS The jury's key priorities for determining publically funded vaccines were: Disease severity - whether the vaccine preventable disease (VPD) was life threatening and impacted on quality of life. Transmissibility - VPDs with high/fast transmission and high prevalence. Demonstration of cost-effectiveness, taking into account purchase price, program administration, economic and societal gain. The jury's recommendations for vaccine funding policy were strongly underpinned by the belief that it was critical to ensure that funding was targeted to not only population groups who would be medically at risk from vaccine preventable diseases, but also to socially and economically disadvantaged population groups. A novel recommendation proposed by the jury was that there should be a process for establishing criteria to remove vaccines from publically funded programs as a complement to the process for adding new vaccines. CONCLUSIONS Young people have valuable contributions to make in priority setting for health programs and their views should be incorporated into the framing of health policies that directly affect them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Parrella
- Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
| | - Annette Braunack-Mayer
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
| | - Joanne Collins
- Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
| | - Michelle Clarke
- Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
| | - Rebecca Tooher
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Flinders Health Economics Group, Flinders University, A Block, Repatriation General Hospital, 202-16 Daws Road, Daw Park, Adelaide, South Australia 5041, Australia.
| | - Helen Marshall
- Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
DISINVESTING FROM INEFFECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES: LESSONS LEARNED FROM CURRENT PROGRAMS. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2015; 31:355-62. [PMID: 26694654 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462315000641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many of the currently used health technologies have never been systematically assessed or are misused, overused or superseded. Therefore, they may be ineffective. Active identification of ineffectiveness in health care is gaining importance to facilitate best care for patients and optimal use of limited resources. The present research analyzed processes and experiences of programs for identifying ineffective health technologies. The goal of this study was to elucidate factors that facilitate implementation. METHODS Based on an overview article, a systematic literature search and unsystematic hand-search were conducted. Further information was gained from international experts. RESULTS Seven programs were identified that include identification, prioritization and assessment of ineffective health technologies and dissemination of recommendations. The programs are quite similar regarding their goals, target groups and criteria for identification and prioritization. Outputs, mainly HTA reports or lists, are mostly disseminated by means of the internet. Top-down and bottom-up programs both have benefits in terms of implementation of recommendations, either as binding guidelines and decisions or as nonbinding information for physicians and other stakeholders. Crucial facilitators of implementation are political will, transparent processes and broad stakeholder involvement focusing on physicians. CONCLUSIONS All programs can improve the quality of health care and enable cost reduction in supportive surrounding conditions. Physicians and patients must be continuously involved in the process of evaluating health technologies. Additionally, decision makers must support programs and translate recommendations into concrete actions.
Collapse
|
38
|
DAMONTI A, FERRARIO L, MORELLI P, MUSSI M, PATREGNANI C, GARAGIOLA E, FOGLIA E, PAGANI R, CARMINATI R, PORAZZI E. A Health Technology Assessment: laparoscopy versus colpoceliotomy. JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 2015; 56:E155-61. [PMID: 26900330 PMCID: PMC4753816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this paper is the comparison between two different technologies used for the removal of a uterine myoma, a frequent benign tumor: the standard technology currently used, laparoscopy, and an innovative one, colpoceliotomy. It was considered relevant to evaluate the real and the potential effects of the two technologies implementation and, in addition, the consequences that the introduction or exclusion of the innovative technology would have for both the National Health System (NHS) and the entire community. METHODS The comparison between these two different technologies, the standard and the innovative one, was conducted using a Health Technology Assessment (HTA). In particular, in order to analyse their differences, a multi-dimensional approach was considered: effectiveness, costs and budget impact analysis data were collected, applying different instruments, such as the Activity Based Costing methodology (ABC), the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) and the Budget Impact Analysis (BIA). Organisational, equity and social impact were also evaluated. RESULTS The results showed that the introduction of colpoceliotomy would provide significant economic savings to the Regional and National Health Service; in particular, a saving of € 453.27 for each surgical procedure. DISCUSSION The introduction of the innovative technology, colpoceliotomy, could be considered a valuable tool; one offering many advantages related to less invasiveness and a shorter surgical procedure than the standard technology currently used (laparoscopy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. DAMONTI
- Carlo Cattaneo University, LIUC, Centre for Research on Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, CREMS, Castellanza, Italy
| | - L. FERRARIO
- Carlo Cattaneo University, LIUC, Centre for Research on Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, CREMS, Castellanza, Italy;,Correspondence: Lucrezia Ferrario, corso Matteotti 22, 21053 Castellanza (VA), Italy - Tel. +39 0331 572504 - Fax +39 0331 572513 - E-mail:
| | | | - M. MUSSI
- Carlo Cattaneo University, LIUC, Centre for Research on Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, CREMS, Castellanza, Italy
| | - C. PATREGNANI
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Civil Legnano Hospital, Italy
| | - E. GARAGIOLA
- Carlo Cattaneo University, LIUC, Centre for Research on Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, CREMS, Castellanza, Italy
| | - E. FOGLIA
- Carlo Cattaneo University, LIUC, Centre for Research on Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, CREMS, Castellanza, Italy
| | - R. PAGANI
- Carlo Cattaneo University, LIUC, Centre for Research on Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, CREMS, Castellanza, Italy
| | - R. CARMINATI
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Civil Legnano Hospital, Italy
| | - E. PORAZZI
- Carlo Cattaneo University, LIUC, Centre for Research on Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, CREMS, Castellanza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Costa-Font J, Forns JR, Sato A. Participatory health system priority setting: Evidence from a budget experiment. Soc Sci Med 2015; 146:182-90. [PMID: 26517295 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2015] [Revised: 10/06/2015] [Accepted: 10/18/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Budget experiments can provide additional guidance to health system reform requiring the identification of a subset of programs and services that accrue the highest social value to 'communities'. Such experiments simulate a realistic budget resource allocation assessment among competitive programs, and position citizens as decision makers responsible for making 'collective sacrifices'. This paper explores the use of a participatory budget experiment (with 88 participants clustered in social groups) to model public health care reform, drawing from a set of realistic scenarios for potential health care users. We measure preferences by employing a contingent ranking alongside a budget allocation exercise (termed 'willingness to assign') before and after program cost information is revealed. Evidence suggests that the budget experiment method tested is cognitively feasible and incentive compatible. The main downside is the existence of ex-ante "cost estimation" bias. Additionally, we find that participants appeared to underestimate the net social gain of redistributive programs. Relative social value estimates can serve as a guide to aid priority setting at a health system level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Costa-Font
- London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Azusa Sato
- London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Smith N, Mitton C, Dowling L, Hiltz MA, Campbell M, Gujar SA. Introducing New Priority Setting and Resource Allocation Processes in a Canadian Healthcare Organization: A Case Study Analysis Informed by Multiple Streams Theory. Int J Health Policy Manag 2015; 5:23-31. [PMID: 26673646 DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this article, we analyze one case instance of how proposals for change to the priority setting and resource allocation (PSRA) processes at a Canadian healthcare institution reached the decision agenda of the organization's senior leadership. We adopt key concepts from an established policy studies framework - Kingdon's multiple streams theory - to inform our analysis. METHODS Twenty-six individual interviews were conducted at the IWK Health Centre in Halifax, NS, Canada. Participants were asked to reflect upon the reasons leading up to the implementation of a formal priority setting process - Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) - in the 2012/2013 fiscal year. Responses were analyzed qualitatively using Kingdon's model as a template. RESULTS The introduction of PBMA can be understood as the opening of a policy window. A problem stream - defined as lack of broad engagement and information sharing across service lines in past practice - converged with a known policy solution, PBMA, which addressed the identified problems and was perceived as easy to use and with an evidence-base from past applications across Canada and elsewhere. Conditions in the political realm allowed for this intervention to proceed, but also constrained its potential outcomes. CONCLUSION Understanding in a theoretically-informed way how change occurs in healthcare management practices can provide useful lessons to researchers and decision-makers whose aim is to help health systems achieve the most effective use of available financial resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neale Smith
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Craig Mitton
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Mary-Ann Hiltz
- Strategy and Organizational Performance, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Matthew Campbell
- Strategy and Organizational Performance, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Shashi Ashok Gujar
- Strategy and Organizational Performance, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cromwell I, Peacock SJ, Mitton C. 'Real-world' health care priority setting using explicit decision criteria: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15:164. [PMID: 25927636 PMCID: PMC4433097 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0814-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2014] [Accepted: 03/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health care decision making requires making resource allocation decisions among programs, services, and technologies that all compete for a finite resource pool. Methods of priority setting that use explicitly defined criteria can aid health care decision makers in arriving at funding decisions in a transparent and systematic way. The purpose of this paper is to review the published literature and examine the use of criteria-based methods in ‘real-world’ health care allocation decisions. Methods A systematic review of the published literature was conducted to find examples of ‘real-world’ priority setting exercises that used explicit criteria to guide decision-making. Results We found thirty-three examples in the peer-reviewed and grey literature, using a variety of methods and criteria. Program effectiveness, equity, affordability, cost-effectiveness, and the number of beneficiaries emerged as the most frequently-used decision criteria. The relative importance of criteria in the ‘real-world’ trials differed from the frequency in preference elicitation exercises. Neither the decision-making method used, nor the relative economic strength of the country in which the exercise took place, appeared to have a strong effect on the type of criteria chosen. Conclusions Health care decisions are made based on criteria related both to the health need of the population and the organizational context of the decision. Following issues related to effectiveness and affordability, ethical issues such as equity and accessibility are commonly identified as important criteria in health care resource allocation decisions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0814-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Cromwell
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada. .,Department of Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Stuart J Peacock
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada. .,Department of Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada. .,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Craig Mitton
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. .,Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hollingworth W, Rooshenas L, Busby J, Hine CE, Badrinath P, Whiting PF, Moore THM, Owen-Smith A, Sterne JAC, Jones HE, Beynon C, Donovan JL. Using clinical practice variations as a method for commissioners and clinicians to identify and prioritise opportunities for disinvestment in health care: a cross-sectional study, systematic reviews and qualitative study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2015. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr03130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundNHS expenditure has stagnated since the economic crisis of 2007, resulting in financial pressures. One response is for policy-makers to regulate use of existing health-care technologies and disinvest from inefficiently used health technologies. A key challenge to disinvestment is to identify existing health technologies with uncertain cost-effectiveness.ObjectivesWe aimed to explore if geographical variation in procedure rates is a marker of clinical uncertainty and might be used by local commissioners to identify procedures that are potential candidates for disinvestment. We also explore obstacles and solutions to local commissioners achieving disinvestment, and patient and clinician perspectives on regulating access to procedures.MethodsWe used Hospital Episode Statistics to measure geographical variation in procedure rates from 2007/8 to 2011/12. Expected procedure numbers for each primary care trust (PCT) were calculated adjusting for proxies of need. Random effects Poisson regression quantified the residual inter-PCT procedure rate variability. We benchmarked local procedure rates in two PCTs against national rates. We conducted rapid systematic reviews of two high-use procedures selected by the PCTs [carpal tunnel release (CTR) and laser capsulotomy], searching bibliographical databases to identify systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted non-participant overt observations of commissioning meetings and semistructured interviews with stakeholders about disinvestment in general and with clinicians and patients about one disinvestment case study. Transcripts were analysed thematically using constant comparison methods derived from grounded theory.ResultsThere was large inter-PCT variability in procedure rates for many common NHS procedures. Variation in procedure rates was highest where the diffusion or discontinuance was rapidly evolving and where substitute procedures were available, suggesting that variation is a proxy for clinical uncertainty about appropriate use. In both PCTs we identified procedures where high local use might represent an opportunity for disinvestment. However, there were barriers to achieving disinvestment in both procedure case studies. RCTs comparing CTR with conservative care indicated that surgery was clinically effective and cost-effective on average but provided limited evidence on patient subgroups to inform commissioning criteria and achieve savings. We found no RCTs of laser capsulotomy. The apparently high rate of capsulotomy was probably due to the coding inaccuracy; some savings might be achieved by greater use of outpatient procedures. Commissioning meetings were dominated by new funding requests. Benchmarking did not appear to be routinely carried out because of capacity issues and concerns about data reliability. Perceived barriers to disinvestment included lack of collaboration, central support and tools for disinvestment. Clinicians felt threshold criteria had little impact on their practice and that prior approval systems would not be cost-effective. Most patients were unaware of rationing.ConclusionsPolicy-makers could use geographical variation as a starting point to identify procedures where health technology reassessment or RCTs might be needed to inform policy. Commissioners can use benchmarking to identify procedures with high local use, possibly indicating overtreatment. However, coding inconsistency and limited evidence are major barriers to achieving disinvestment through benchmarking. Increased central support for commissioners to tackle disinvestment is needed, including tools, accurate data and relevant evidence. Early engagement with patients and clinicians is essential for successful local disinvestment.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - John Busby
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | - Theresa HM Moore
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Amanda Owen-Smith
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jonathan AC Sterne
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Hayley E Jones
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jenny L Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Paulden M, Stafinski T, Menon D, McCabe C. Value-based reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs: a scoping review and decision framework. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2015; 33:255-69. [PMID: 25412735 PMCID: PMC4342524 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0235-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate of development of new orphan drugs continues to grow. As a result, reimbursing orphan drugs on an exceptional basis is increasingly difficult to sustain from a health system perspective. An understanding of the value that societies attach to providing orphan drugs at the expense of other health technologies is now recognised as an important input to policy debates. OBJECTIVES The aim of this work was to scope the social value arguments that have been advanced relating to the reimbursement of orphan drugs, and to locate these within a coherent decision-making framework to aid reimbursement decisions in the presence of limited healthcare resources. METHODS A scoping review of the peer reviewed and grey literature was undertaken, consisting of seven phases: (1) identifying the research question; (2) searching for relevant studies; (3) selecting studies; (4) charting, extracting and tabulating data; (5) analyzing data; (6) consulting relevant experts; and (7) presenting results. The points within decision processes where the identified value arguments would be incorporated were then located. This mapping was used to construct a framework characterising the distinct role of each value in informing decision making. RESULTS The scoping review identified 19 candidate decision factors, most of which can be characterised as either value-bearing or 'opportunity cost'-determining, and also a number of value propositions and pertinent sources of preference information. We were able to synthesize these into a coherent decision-making framework. CONCLUSION Our framework may be used to structure policy discussions and to aid transparency about the values underlying reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs. These values ought to be consistently applied to all technologies and populations affected by the decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Paulden
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, 736 University Terrace, 8303 112 St, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2T4, Canada,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wilson MG, Ellen ME, Lavis JN, Grimshaw JM, Moat KA, Shemer J, Sullivan T, Garner S, Goeree R, Grilli R, Peffer J, Samra K. Processes, contexts, and rationale for disinvestment: a protocol for a critical interpretive synthesis. Syst Rev 2014; 3:143. [PMID: 25495034 PMCID: PMC4273322 DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2014] [Accepted: 11/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practical solutions are needed to support the appropriate use of available health system resources as countries are continually pressured to 'do more with less' in health care. Increasingly, health systems and organizations are exploring the reassessment of possibly obsolete, inefficient, or ineffective health system resources and potentially redirecting funds to those that are more effective and efficient. Such processes are often referred to as 'disinvestment'. Our objective is to gain further understanding about: 1) whether how and under what conditions health systems decide to pursue disinvestment; 2) how health systems have chosen to undertake disinvestment; and 3) how health systems have implemented their disinvestment approach. METHODS/DESIGN We will use a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) approach, to develop a theoretical framework based on insights drawn from a range of relevant sources. We will conduct systematic searches of databases as well as purposive searches to identify literature to fill conceptual gaps that may emerge during our inductive process of synthesis and analysis. Two independent reviewers will assess search results for relevance and conceptually map included references. We will include all empirical and non-empirical articles that focus on disinvestment at a system level. We will then extract key findings from a purposive sample of articles using frameworks related to government agendas, policy development and implementation, and health system contextual factors and then synthesize and integrate the findings to develop a framework about our core areas of interest. Lastly, we will convene a stakeholder dialogue with Canadian and international policymakers and other stakeholders to solicit targeted feedback about the framework (e.g., by identifying any gaps in the literature that we may want to revisit before finalizing it) and deliberating about barriers for developing and implementing approaches to disinvestment, strategies to address these barriers and about next steps that could be taken by different constituencies. DISCUSSION Disinvestment is an emerging field and there is a need for evidence to inform the prioritization, development, and implementation of strategies in different contexts. Our CIS and the framework developed through it will support the actions of those involved in the prioritization, development, and implementation of disinvestment initiatives. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42014013204.
Collapse
|
45
|
Kreindler SA. What if implementation is not the problem? Exploring the missing links between knowledge and action. Int J Health Plann Manage 2014; 31:208-26. [PMID: 25424863 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2014] [Revised: 09/28/2014] [Accepted: 10/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Given all the available knowledge about effective implementation, why do many organizations continue to have-or appear to have-an implementation problem? Analysis of a 7-year corpus of reports by a Canadian health region's "embedded" research and evaluation unit sought to discover the source of the region's intractable difficulty implementing improvement. Findings suggested that the problem was neither a lack of knowledge (decision-makers displayed sophisticated understanding of fundamental issues) nor an inability to take action (there existed sufficient capacity to implement change). However, managers' high-level knowledge was not made actionable, and micro-level decision-making often produced piecemeal actions inadequately informed by existing knowledge. The problem arose at the stage of "operationalization"-the identification of concrete, executable actions fully informed by knowledge of complex, system-level issues. Yet this crucial phase is a focus of neither the implementation nor knowledge translation (KT) literatures. The organizational decision-making literature reveals how decision-makers initiate operationalization (i.e., by setting the direction for a discovery approach) but not how they can ensure its successful completion. The focus of KT research and practice should expand to explicating and improving decision-making, lest KT become an exercise of infusing content into a broken process. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara A Kreindler
- Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, Winnipeg, Canada.,University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Changing priority setting practice: the role of implementation in practice change. Health Policy 2014; 117:266-74. [PMID: 24815208 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2013] [Revised: 03/02/2014] [Accepted: 04/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) is a priority setting approach that assists decision makers in choosing among resource demands. This paper describes and evaluates the process of implementing PBMA in a Canadian regional health authority, and draws out key lessons learned from this experience. METHODS Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured participant interviews (twelve post year-1; nine post year-2), meeting attendance, and document review. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a constant comparison technique. Other data were analyzed to evaluate PBMA implementation. RESULTS Desire for more clarity and for PBMA adaptations emerged as overarching themes. Participants desired greater clarity of their roles and how PBMA should be used to achieve PBMA's potential benefits. They argued that each PBMA stage should be useful independent of the others so that implementation could be adapted. To help improve clarity and ensure that resources were available to support PBMA, participants requested an organizational readiness and capacity assessment. CONCLUSION We suggest tactics by which PBMA may be more closely aligned with real-world priority setting practice. Our results also contribute to the literature on PBMA use in various healthcare settings. Highlighting implementation issues and potential responses to these should be of interest to decision makers implementing PBMA and other evidence-informed practices.
Collapse
|
47
|
Health sector priority setting at meso-level in lower and middle income countries: lessons learned, available options and suggested steps. Soc Sci Med 2013; 102:190-200. [PMID: 24565157 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2012] [Revised: 11/25/2013] [Accepted: 11/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Setting priority for health programming and budget allocation is an important issue, but there is little consensus on related processes. It is particularly relevant in low resource settings and at province- and district- or "meso-level", where contextual influences may be greater, information scarce and capacity lower. Although recent changes in disease epidemiology and health financing suggest even greater need to allocate resources effectively, the literature is relatively silent on evidence-based priority-setting in low and middle income countries (LMICs). We conducted a comprehensive review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature on health resource priority-setting in LMICs, focussing on meso-level and the evidence-based priority-setting processes (PSPs) piloted or suggested there. Our objective was to assess PSPs according to whether they have influenced resource allocation and impacted the outcome indicators prioritised. An exhaustive search of the peer-reviewed and grey literature published in the last decade yielded 57 background articles and 75 reports related to priority-setting at meso-level in LMICs. Although proponents of certain PSPs still advocate their use, other experts instead suggest broader elements to guide priority-setting. We conclude that currently no process can be confidently recommended for such settings. We also assessed the common reasons for failure at all levels of priority-setting and concluded further that local authorities should additionally consider contextual and systems limitations likely to prevent a satisfactory process and outcomes, particularly at meso-level. Recent literature proposes a list of related attributes and warning signs, and facilitated our preparation of a simple decision-tree or roadmap to help determine whether or not health systems issues should be improved in parallel to support for needed priority-setting; what elements of the PSP need improving; monitoring, and evaluation. Health priority-setting at meso-level in LMICs can involve common processes, but will often require additional attention to local health systems.
Collapse
|
48
|
Dionne F, Mitton C, MacDonald T, Miller C, Brennan M. The challenge of obtaining information necessary for multi-criteria decision analysis implementation: the case of physiotherapy services in Canada. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2013; 11:11. [PMID: 23688138 PMCID: PMC3699379 DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-11-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2012] [Accepted: 05/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As fiscal constraints dominate health policy discussions across Canada and globally, priority-setting exercises are becoming more common to guide the difficult choices that must be made. In this context, it becomes highly desirable to have accurate estimates of the value of specific health care interventions.Economic evaluation is a well-accepted method to estimate the value of health care interventions. However, economic evaluation has significant limitations, which have lead to an increase in the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). One key concern with MCDA is the availability of the information necessary for implementation. In the Fall 2011, the Canadian Physiotherapy Association embarked on a project aimed at providing a valuation of physiotherapy services that is both evidence-based and relevant to resource allocation decisions. The framework selected for this project was MCDA. We report on how we addressed the challenge of obtaining some of the information necessary for MCDA implementation. METHODS MCDA criteria were selected and areas of physiotherapy practices were identified. The building up of the necessary information base was a three step process. First, there was a literature review for each practice area, on each criterion. The next step was to conduct interviews with experts in each of the practice areas to critique the results of the literature review and to fill in gaps where there was no or insufficient literature. Finally, the results of the individual interviews were validated by a national committee to ensure consistency across all practice areas and that a national level perspective is applied. RESULTS Despite a lack of research evidence on many of the considerations relevant to the estimation of the value of physiotherapy services (the criteria), sufficient information was obtained to facilitate MCDA implementation at the local level. CONCLUSIONS The results of this research project serve two purposes: 1) a method to obtain information necessary to implement MCDA is described, and 2) the results in terms of information on the benefits provided by each of the twelve areas of physiotherapy practice can be used by decision-makers as a starting point in the implementation of MCDA at the local level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francois Dionne
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 7th Floor, 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Craig Mitton
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 7th Floor, 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | | | - Carol Miller
- Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Using health technology assessment to support optimal use of technologies in current practice: the challenge of "disinvestment". Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012; 28:203-10. [PMID: 22792877 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462312000372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health systems face rising patient expectations and economic pressures; decision makers seek to enhance efficiency to improve access to appropriate care. There is international interest in the role of HTA to support decisions to optimize use of established technologies, particularly in "disinvesting" from low-benefit uses. METHODS This study summarizes main points from an HTAi Policy Forum meeting on this topic, drawing on presentations, discussions among attendees, and an advance background paper. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Optimization involves assessment or re-assessment of a technology, a decision on optimal use, and decision implementation. This may occur within a routine process to improve safety and quality and create "headroom" for new technologies, or ad hoc in response to financial constraints. The term "disinvestment" is not always helpful in describing these processes. HTA contributes to optimization, but there is scope to increase its role in many systems. Stakeholders may have strong views on access to technology, and stakeholder involvement is essential. Optimization faces challenges including loss aversion and entitlement, stakeholder inertia and entrenchment, heterogeneity in patient outcomes, and the need to demonstrate convincingly absence of benefit. While basic HTA principles remain applicable, methodological developments are needed better to support optimization. These include mechanisms for candidate technology identification and prioritization, enhanced collection and analysis of routine data, and clinician engagement. To maximize value to decision makers, HTA should consider implementation strategies and barriers. Improving optimization processes calls for a coordinated approach, and actions are identified for system leaders, HTA and other health organizations, and industry.
Collapse
|
50
|
Smith N, Mitton C, Davidson A, Gibson J, Peacock S, Bryan S, Donaldson C. Design and implementation of a survey of senior Canadian healthcare decision-makers: Organization-wide resource allocation processes. Health (London) 2012. [DOI: 10.4236/health.2012.411154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|