1
|
Bucek Psenkova M, Hlavinkova L, Visnansky M, Grega D, Ondrusova M. The Checklist for Standard Methodological Requirements and Reporting of Economic Evaluation of Medicines in Slovakia. Value Health Reg Issues 2024; 39:14-19. [PMID: 37967490 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We have developed a scientifically well-grounded, methodological, and reporting checklist for economic evaluation (EE) of medicines in the Slovak health technology assessment process, which serves as a supplement to the Slovak pharmacoeconomic guidelines. METHODS The checklist was developed using an iterative process in which items were generated and gradually added to the baseline checklist based on shortcomings identified in an analysis of Slovak EEs, using relevant published checklists, and Slovak, as well as international, methodological guidance that was identified in the systematic literature review. The selection of checklist recommendations, their clarity, and relevance to the Slovak setting were validated in the online survey. RESULTS From the sample of 151 price and reimbursement submissions published between January 2018 and July 2021, almost half of them (n = 73) received at least 1 request from the Ministry of Healthcare to justify or modify the methodology used in the EE; and in 18 proceedings, a negative opinion was issued because of shortcomings identified in the EE. The 25-items preliminary checklist, resulting from an iterative working process, has been validated in an online survey conducted among members of ISPOR Chapter Slovakia. After incorporating relevant comments, the final proposal for the Slovak checklist consists of 55 recommendations. CONCLUSIONS The research represented the first attempt to create a Slovak EE checklist, which serves as a part of ISPOR Slovakia pharmacoeconomic guidelines. Implementation of the checklist allows checking whether EE meets legislative and methodological requirements and thus helps in improving the appropriateness and standardization of EEs in Slovakia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Martin Visnansky
- University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Kosice, Slovakia
| | - Dominik Grega
- Pharm-In, Ltd., Bratislava, Slovakia; Department of Applied Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Masaryk university, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martina Ondrusova
- Pharm-In, Ltd., Bratislava, Slovakia; Department of Preventive and Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mfutso-Bengo J, Jeremiah F, Kasende-Chinguwo F, Ng'ambi W, Nkungula N, Kazanga-Chiumia I, Juma M, Chawani M, Chinkhumba J, Twea P, Chirwa E, Langwe K, Manthalu G, Ngwira LG, Nkhoma D, Colbourn T, Revill P, Sculpher M. A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:353. [PMID: 37041590 PMCID: PMC10088659 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Malawi. METHODS This study employed a document review and qualitative research methods, to understand the status of HTA in Malawi. This was complemented by a review of the status and nature of HTA institutionalization in selected countries.Qualitative research employed a Focus Group Discussion (FGD ) with 7 participants, and Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with12 informants selected based on their knowledge and expertise in policy processes related to HTA in Malawi.Data extracted from the literature was organized in Microsoft Excel, categorized according to thematic areas and analyzed using a literature review framework. Qualitative data from KIIs and the FGD was analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS Some HTA processes exist and are executed through three structures namely: Ministry of Health Senior Management Team, Technical Working Groups, and Pharmacy and Medicines Regulatory Authority (PMRA) with varyingdegrees of effectiveness.The main limitations of current HTA mechanisms include limited evidence use, lack of a standardized framework for technology adoption, donor pressure, lack of resources for the HTA process and technology acquisition, laws and practices that undermine cost-effectiveness considerations. KII and FGD results showed overwhelming demand for strengthening HTA in Malawi, with a stronger preference for strengthening coordination and capacity of existing entities and structures. CONCLUSION The study has shown that HTA institutionalization is acceptable and feasible in Malawi. However, the current committee based processes are suboptimal to improve efficiency due to lack of a structured framework. A structured HTA framework has the potential to improve processes in pharmaceuticals and medical technologies decision-making.In the short to medium term, HTA capacity building should focus on generating demand and increasing capacity in cost-effectiveness assessments. Country-specific assessments should precede HTA institutionalization as well as recommendations for new technology adoptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Mfutso-Bengo
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi.
- Centre of Bioethics in Eastern and Southern Africa, Blantyre, Malawi.
| | - Faless Jeremiah
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Florence Kasende-Chinguwo
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Wingston Ng'ambi
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Centre of Excellence in Ethics and Governance, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Nthanda Nkungula
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Isabel Kazanga-Chiumia
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Mercy Juma
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Marlen Chawani
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Jobiba Chinkhumba
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Pakwanja Twea
- Ministry of Health, Malawi Government, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Emily Chirwa
- Ministry of Health, Malawi Government, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Kate Langwe
- Ministry of Health, Malawi Government, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | | | - Lucky Gift Ngwira
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Dominic Nkhoma
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Tim Colbourn
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Revill
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Sculpher
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Association of exogenous factors with the access to innovative pharmaceutical products in Hungary. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0281280. [PMID: 36745671 PMCID: PMC9901764 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Access to innovative pharmaceuticals is thought to be associated with several exogenous factors related to the local legal or financial framework of pharmaceutical reimbursement. Our aim was to describe the association between the outcome of the reimbursement procedure on innovative pharmaceutical submissions in Hungary and several potential explanatory variables related to the legal or financial framework of reimbursement procedures, such as the submission implying a need for a legal act to conclude on a positive decision; having a risk-sharing agreement (RSA) in place at the time of submission; the aim of the submission and expenditure on individual funding requests. METHODS Publicly available administrative announcements of the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund Manager were used to construct the analysis dataset including all concluded procedures between 1 January 2018 and 7 June 2021, complemented with information on the overall aim of the submission (new compound or new indication). Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios while adjusting for potential confounding. RESULTS Needing a legislative change as a proxy of involving high-level decision makers to reimburse had a lower (OR = 0.05, CI95%:0.02-0.11), whereas having an RSA had a statistically significant higher chance of a positive decision (OR = 3.49, CI95%:1.56-7.82). In contrast, neither the overall purpose of the submission (OR = 1.32, CI95%:0.65-2.69), nor the average biennial expenditure on individual funding requests exceeding 200 million HUFs (OR = 1.04, CI95%:0.92-1.19) had a statistically significant association with the decision. CONCLUSIONS This study quantitatively demonstrated that the need for legal acts to conclude on a positive decision decreases, whereas having an RSA for the particular product increases the likelihood of a positive reimbursement decision in Hungary. The role of other factors remain unclear. Our findings suggest that the legal requirements and RSAs play key roles in the reimbursement of innovative pharmaceuticals and can be viewed as potential areas of policy interventions in expanding access to these products, although the feasibility of such interventions need strong commitment from decision-makers, as well as implying increased autonomy to the entities involved in reimbursement procedures. Further research is needed to assess the impact of endogenous and exogenous factors in a coherent framework.
Collapse
|
4
|
Health Technology Assessment in Turkey: Current Status and Perspectives on Future Implementation. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2022.100701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
|
5
|
Merész G, Dóczy V, Hölgyesi Á, Németh G. A critical assessment framework to identify, quantify and interpret the sources of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analyses. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:822. [PMID: 35752772 PMCID: PMC9233343 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08214-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Using a standardized approach to describe the sources of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analyses might bring added value to the local critical assessment procedure of reimbursement submissions in Hungary. The aim of this research is to present a procedural framework to identify, quantify and interpret sources of uncertainty, using the reimbursement dossier of darolutamide as an illustrative example. Methods In the procedural framework designed for the critical assessment of cost-effectiveness analyses, the quantifiability of an identified source of uncertainty is assessed through the input parameters of the originally submitted model, which is followed by the interpretation of its impact on estimates of costs and outcomes compared to the base case cost-effectiveness conclusion. Results Based on our experiences with the recent reimbursement dossier of darolutamide, the significant and quantifiable sources of uncertainty were the time horizon of the economic analysis; the restriction of the efficacy analysis population; long-term relative effectiveness of darolutamide; price discount on subsequent therapies. We identified resource use patterns for comparator and subsequent therapies as a quantifiable, yet non-significant source of uncertainty. The EQ-5D value set used to estimate utility values was identified as a non-quantifiable and potentially not significant source of uncertainty. Conclusions The procedural framework, demonstrated with an example, was sufficiently flexible and coherent to document and structure the sources of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analyses. The full-scale use of this framework is desirable during the decision-making process for reimbursement in Hungary. The further formalization of identifying sources of uncertainty is a possible subject of methodological development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gergő Merész
- National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Szabolcs street 33, Budapest, 1135, Hungary. .,Semmelweis University, Üllői street 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
| | - Veronika Dóczy
- National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Szabolcs street 33, Budapest, 1135, Hungary
| | - Áron Hölgyesi
- National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Szabolcs street 33, Budapest, 1135, Hungary.,Semmelweis University, Üllői street 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary
| | - Gergely Németh
- National Insititute of Health Insurance Management, Váci street 73/A, Budapest, 1139, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vončina L, Strbad T, Fürst J, Dimitrova M, Kamusheva M, Vila M, Mardare I, Hristova K, Harsanyi A, Atanasijević D, Banović I, Bobinac A. Pricing and Reimbursement of Patent-Protected Medicines: Challenges and Lessons from South-Eastern Europe. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2021; 19:915-927. [PMID: 34553334 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00678-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficiency and transparency of pricing and reimbursement (P&R) rules and procedures as well as their implementation in South-eastern Europe (SEE) lag substantially behind Western European practice. Nevertheless, P&R systems in SEE are rarely critically assessed, warranting a detailed and wider-encompassing exploration. OBJECTIVE Our study provides a comparative assessment of P&R processes for patent-protected medicines in ten SEE countries-EU member states: Croatia, Slovenia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria; and non-EU countries: Albania, Montenegro, Serbia, North Maceodina, Bosnia and Herzegovina. P&R systems are compared and evaluated through a research framework that focuses on: (1) public financing of patent-protected medicines, (2) definition of benefit packages, (3) requirements for the submission of reimbursement dossiers, (4) assessment and appraisal processes, (5) reimbursement decision making, (6) processes that occur post reimbursement, and (7) pricing. The study aims to contribute to the discussion on improving the efficiency and quality of P&R of patent-protected medicines in the region. METHODS We conducted a non-systematic literature review of published literature, as well as policy briefs and reports on healthcare systems in the SEE region along with legal documents framing the P&R procedures in local languages. The information gathered from these various sources was then discussed and clarified through structured telephone interviews with relevant national experts from each SEE country, mainly current and former senior officials and/or executives of the funding and assessment/ appraisal bodies (total of 20 interviews conducted in late 2019). RESULTS Capacity building through sharing knowledge and information on successful reforms across borders is an opportunity for SEE countries to further develop their P&R policies and increase (equitable) access to patent-protected medicines (especially expensive medicines), increasing affordability and containing costs. Simple yet robust and systematic decision-making frameworks that rely on international health technology assessment (HTA) procedures and are based on the pursuit of transparency seem to be the most cost-effective approach to strengthening P&R systems in SEE. CONCLUSIONS Further reforms aiming to develop transparent and robust national decision-making frameworks (including oversight) and build institutional HTA-related and decision-making capacity are awaited in most of SEE countries, especially the non-EU members. In non-EU SEE countries, these efforts could increase access to patent-protected medicines, which is-at the moment-very limited. The EU-member SEE countries operate more developed P&R systems but could further benefit from developing their procedures, oversight and value-for-money assessment toolbox and capacity, hence further improving the transparency and efficiency of procedures that regulate access to patent-protected medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luka Vončina
- Faculty of Health Studies, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Tea Strbad
- Croatian Health Insurance Fund, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Jurij Fürst
- Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maria Dimitrova
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Maria Kamusheva
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Megi Vila
- F. Hoffmann, La Roche, Tirana, Albania
| | - Ileana Mardare
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | | | - Igor Banović
- Faculty of Economics and Business, Center for Health economics and Pharmacoeconomics (CHEP), University of Rijeka, Ivana Filipovića 4, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Ana Bobinac
- Faculty of Economics and Business, Center for Health economics and Pharmacoeconomics (CHEP), University of Rijeka, Ivana Filipovića 4, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jakab I, Németh B, Elezbawy B, Karadayı MA, Tozan H, Aydın S, Shen J, Kaló Z. Potential Criteria for Frameworks to Support the Evaluation of Innovative Medicines in Upper Middle-Income Countries-A Systematic Literature Review on Value Frameworks and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:1203. [PMID: 32922287 PMCID: PMC7456841 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), a formal decision support framework, has been growing in popularity recently in the field of health care. MCDA can support pricing and reimbursement decisions on the macro level, which is of great importance especially in countries with more limited resources. Objectives The aim of this systematic review was to facilitate the development of future MCDA frameworks, by proposing a set of criteria focusing on the purchasing decisions of single-source innovative pharmaceuticals in upper middle-income countries. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted on the decision criteria included in value frameworks (VFs) or MCDA tools. Scopus, Medline, databases of universities, websites of Health Technology Assessment Agencies, and other relevant organizations were included in the search. Double title-abstract screening and double full-text review were conducted, and all extracted data were double-checked. A team of researchers performed the merging and selection process of the extracted criteria. Results A total of 1,878 articles entered the title and abstract screening. From these, 341 were eligible to the full-text review, and 36 were included in the final data extraction phase. From these articles 394 criteria were extracted in total. After deduplication and clustering, 26 different criteria were identified. After the merging and selection process, a set of 16 general criteria was proposed. Conclusion Based on the results of the systematic literature review, a pool of 16 criteria was selected. This can serve as a starting point for constructing MCDA frameworks in upper middle-income countries after careful adaptation to the local context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivett Jakab
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | | | - Hakan Tozan
- İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Jie Shen
- Novartis International AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.,Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beletsi A, Koutrafouri V, Karampli E, Pavi E. Comparing Use of Health Technology Assessment in Pharmaceutical Policy among Earlier and More Recent Adopters in the European Union. Value Health Reg Issues 2018; 16:81-91. [PMID: 30316029 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2018] [Revised: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine and compare the use of health technology assessment (HTA) for the reimbursement of new medicines in selected European Union member states with decades of experience in the use of HTA and in countries that have used it regularly since 2000. METHODS The selected countries were categorized into "earlier" adopters (group A: England, Germany, France, and Sweden) and more "recent" adopters (group B: Poland, Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania). A systematic review of published literature was performed. The analysis and comparison of HTA procedures were done by using an analytical framework. RESULTS In all countries, the assessment criteria used include effectiveness, safety, relative effectiveness, and economic data. In group A countries, the main objectives are improving quality of care, ensuring equal access, and efficient use of resources. Group B countries have established HTA organizations with official guidelines but often seek the decisions of other developed countries. They place considerable emphasis on the budget impact of new therapies, and HTA is also used as a cost estimation tool for state budgets. CONCLUSIONS HTA organizations have been developed dynamically not only in high-income countries but also in countries with limited resources. The experience and evolution of both can be used by countries that are in the dawn of creating an HTA organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Beletsi
- Department of Health Economics, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece; Servier Hellas Pharmaceuticals EPE, Athens, Greece.
| | - Vassiliki Koutrafouri
- Department of Health Economics, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece; National Organization for Medicines, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleftheria Karampli
- Department of Health Economics, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece
| | - Elpida Pavi
- Department of Health Economics, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
When health technology assessment is confidential and experts have no power: the case of Hungary. HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW 2018; 14:162-181. [PMID: 29576025 DOI: 10.1017/s1744133118000051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Health technology assessment (HTA) is not simply a mechanistic technical exercise as it takes place within a specific institutional context. Yet, we know little about how this context influences the operation of HTA and its ability to influence policy and practice. We seek to demonstrate the importance of considering institutional context, using a case study of Hungary, a country that has pioneered HTA in Central and Eastern Europe. We conducted 26 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with public- and private-sector stakeholders. We found that while the HTA Department, the Hungarian HTA organisation, fulfilled its formal role envisaged in the legislation, its potential for supporting evidence-based decision-making was not fully realised given the low levels of transparency and stakeholder engagement. Further, the Department's practical influence throughout the reimbursement process was perceived as being constrained by the payer and policy-makers, as well as its own limited organisational capacity. There was also scepticism as to whether the current operational form of the HTA process delivered 'good value for money'. Nevertheless, it still had a positive impact on the development of a broader institutional HTA infrastructure in Hungary. Our findings highlight the importance of considering institutional context in analysing the HTA function within health systems.
Collapse
|
10
|
Transparency in practice: Evidence from ‘verification analyses’ issued by the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment in 2012–2015. HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW 2018; 14:182-204. [DOI: 10.1017/s1744133117000342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractTransparency is recognised to be a key underpinning of the work of health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, yet it has only recently become a subject of systematic inquiry. We contribute to this research field by considering the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AHTAPol). We situate the AHTAPol in a broader context by comparing it with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England. To this end, we analyse all 332 assessment reports, called verification analyses, that the AHTAPol issued from 2012 to 2015, and a stratified sample of 22 Evidence Review Group reports published by NICE in the same period. Overall, by increasingly presenting its key conclusions in assessment reports, the AHTAPol has reached the transparency standards set out by NICE in transparency of HTA outputs. The AHTAPol is more transparent than NICE in certain aspects of the HTA process, such as providing rationales for redacting assessment reports and providing summaries of expert opinions. Nevertheless, it is less transparent in other areas of the HTA process, such as including information on expert conflicts of interest. Our findings have important implications for understanding HTA in Poland and more broadly. We use them to formulate recommendations for policymakers.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bucek Psenkova M, Visnansky M, Mackovicova S, Tomek D. Drug Policy in Slovakia. Value Health Reg Issues 2017; 13:44-49. [PMID: 29073987 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2017.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Revised: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 07/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Slovak law sets clear rules and timelines in the process of approving the price and reimbursement of drugs. During the last decade, the Ministry of Health adopted several cost-containment measures in the price and reimbursement policy. The most effective measures were the implementation of the external referencing of drug prices in 2008 and the reimbursement law in 2011. The new act introduced several regulations such as making stricter rules for the referencing of prices, setting cost per quality-adjusted life-year threshold, and defining new rules for the setting of reimbursements. On one side, implementation of these measures helped to achieve visible cost savings, but, on the other side, cost-containment policies have had some unintended consequences. In recent years, Slovakia has been facing a decreased availability of drugs because of parallel exports. As a result of the government's effort, Slovakia is the only country in the European Union that implemented a legal ban on the re-export of medicines. During the decade before 2011, many innovative drugs were included in the reimbursement system. Because of stricter legal conditions introduced in 2011, there has been a gradual shift in reimbursing innovative drugs from the standard reimbursement system to reimbursement by way of exceptions of health insurance companies. Recently, there has been an ongoing discussion on possible changes to the reimbursement law.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin Visnansky
- University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Kosice, Slovakia
| | | | - Dominik Tomek
- Faculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Drug Policy in Hungary. Value Health Reg Issues 2017; 13:16-22. [PMID: 29073982 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2017.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Revised: 06/02/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
We present a brief overview of the health care system in Hungary, focusing particularly on the pricing and reimbursement procedures of medicines. The National Institute of Health Insurance Fund Management is responsible for the administration of the health insurance system and public reimbursement of health technologies. There are two major types of reimbursement techniques in the outpatient care: the normative reimbursement is applied to all physicians and may be used for all indications listed in the Summary of Product Characteristics, and the indication-linked reimbursement is applied only to specialists who are authorized to prescribe the drug. Pharmaceuticals used in the inpatient care are fully reimbursed and are financed through diagnosis-related groups. Several cost-containment measures such as external price referencing and internal price referencing with blind bidding are applied. Proposing managed entry agreements is a mandatory condition for reimbursing innovative pharmaceuticals. Compared with other countries in the region, the implementation of health technology assessment has a relatively long history in Hungary. The health technology assessment body critically evaluates reimbursement submissions of pharmaceuticals, simple medical devices, and complex medical devices such as hospital technologies.
Collapse
|
13
|
OVERVIEW ON THE CURRENT IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM IN HUNGARY. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2017; 33:333-338. [PMID: 28434433 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462317000071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our objectives were to assess the current implementation of health technology assessment (HTA) in Hungary and to identify country-specific patterns of challenges and potential improvements. METHODS We applied a structure that can be used to create HTA implementation roadmaps to evaluate various issues regarding HTA implementation. A comprehensive description of the Hungarian HTA system is presented according to relevant literature and experiences of the authors. RESULTS By investigating eight components of HTA implementation, we identified the most important strengths and weaknesses of the Hungarian system. More specifically, we were mainly focusing on the emergence of HTA capacity, the establishment and current role of Department of HTA, the complex process of decision making, the quality elements developed in the near past, and the activity of Hungarian experts at international collaborations. CONCLUSIONS We concluded that there is a sophisticated methodological and educational basis for HTA in Hungary. A permanent focus on capacity building and changes to the reimbursement procedure can further improve transparency and the scientific basis of decision making in the country.
Collapse
|
14
|
Bochenek T, Kocot E, Rodzinka M, Godman B, Maciejewska K, Kamal S, Pilc A. The transparency of published health technology assessment-based recommendations on pharmaceutical reimbursement in Poland. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2016; 17:385-400. [DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1262767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Bochenek
- Department of Drug Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Ewa Kocot
- Health Economics and Social Security Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Marcin Rodzinka
- Health Promotion Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Brian Godman
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Strathclyde University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Katarzyna Maciejewska
- Health Promotion Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Susan Kamal
- Community Pharmacy Department, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Andrzej Pilc
- Department of Neurobiology, Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kaló Z, Gheorghe A, Huic M, Csanádi M, Kristensen FB. HTA Implementation Roadmap in Central and Eastern European Countries. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2016; 25 Suppl 1:179-92. [PMID: 26763688 PMCID: PMC5066682 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2015] [Revised: 08/20/2015] [Accepted: 09/24/2015] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
The opportunity cost of inappropriate health policy decisions is greater in Central and Eastern European (CEE) compared with Western European (WE) countries because of poorer population health and more limited healthcare resources. Application of health technology assessment (HTA) prior to healthcare financing decisions can improve the allocative efficiency of scarce resources. However, few CEE countries have a clear roadmap for HTA implementation. Examples from high-income countries may not be directly relevant, as CEE countries cannot allocate so much financial and human resources for substantiating policy decisions with evidence. Our objective was to describe the main HTA implementation scenarios in CEE countries and summarize the most important questions related to capacity building, financing HTA research, process and organizational structure for HTA, standardization of HTA methodology, use of local data, scope of mandatory HTA, decision criteria, and international collaboration in HTA. Although HTA implementation strategies from the region can be relevant examples for other CEE countries with similar cultural environment and economic status, HTA roadmaps are not still fully transferable without taking into account country-specific aspects, such as country size, gross domestic product per capita, major social values, public health priorities, and fragmentation of healthcare financing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltán Kaló
- Department of Health Policy and Health Economics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Adrian Gheorghe
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Mirjana Huic
- Department for Development, Research and HTA, Agency for Quality and Accreditation in Health Care and Social Welfare, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Finn Boerlum Kristensen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Danish Health and Medicines Authority, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Narrative review. OBJECTIVE To review the common tenets, strengths, and weaknesses of decision modeling for health economic assessment and to review the use of decision modeling in the spine literature to date. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA For the majority of spinal interventions, well-designed prospective, randomized, pragmatic cost-effectiveness studies that address the specific decision-in-need are lacking. Decision analytic modeling allows for the estimation of cost-effectiveness based on data available to date. Given the rising demands for proven value in spine care, the use of decision analytic modeling is rapidly increasing by clinicians and policy makers. METHODS This narrative review discusses the general components of decision analytic models, how decision analytic models are populated and the trade-offs entailed, makes recommendations for how users of spine intervention decision models might go about appraising the models, and presents an overview of published spine economic models. RESULTS A proper, integrated, clinical, and economic critical appraisal is necessary in the evaluation of the strength of evidence provided by a modeling evaluation. As is the case with clinical research, all options for collecting health economic or value data are not without their limitations and flaws. There is substantial heterogeneity across the 20 spine intervention health economic modeling studies summarized with respect to study design, models used, reporting, and general quality. There is sparse evidence for populating spine intervention models. Results mostly showed that interventions were cost-effective based on $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year threshold. Spine care providers, as partners with their health economic colleagues, have unique clinical expertise and perspectives that are critical to interpret the strengths and weaknesses of health economic models. CONCLUSION Health economic models must be critically appraised for both clinical validity and economic quality before altering health care policy, payment strategies, or patient care decisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Collapse
|
17
|
Boncz I, Kaló Z, Mohamed Ibrahim MIB, Greenberg D. Further Steps in the Development of Pharmacoeconomics, Outcomes Research, and Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern Europe, Western Asia, and Africa. Value Health Reg Issues 2013; 2:169-170. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2013.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
18
|
Kaló Z, Bodrogi J, Boncz I, Dózsa C, Jóna G, Kövi R, Pásztélyi Z, Sinkovits B. Capacity Building for HTA Implementation in Middle-Income Countries: The Case of Hungary. Value Health Reg Issues 2013; 2:264-266. [PMID: 29702875 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2013.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Middle-income countries often have no clear roadmap for implementation of health technology assessment (HTA) in policy decisions. Examples from high-income countries may not be relevant, as lower income countries cannot allocate so much financial and human resources for substantiating policy decisions with evidence. Therefore, HTA implementation roadmaps from other smaller-size, lower-income countries can be more relevant examples for countries with similar cultural environment and economic status. METHODS We reviewed the capacity building process for HTA implementation in Hungary with special focus on the role of ISPOR Hungary Chapter. RESULTS HTA implementation in Hungary started with capacity building at universities with the support of the World Bank in the mid 90's, followed by the publication of methodological guidelines for conducting health economic evaluations in 2002. The Hungarian Health Economics Association (META) - established in 2003 - has been recognized as a driving force of HTA implementation. META became the official regional ISPOR Chapter of Hungary in 2007. In 2004 the National Health Insurance Fund Administration made the cost-effectiveness and budget impact criteria compulsory prior to granting reimbursement to new pharmaceuticals. An Office of Health Technology Assessment was established for the critical appraisal of economic evaluations submitted by pharmaceutical manufacturers. In 2010 multicriteria decision analysis was introduced for new hospital technologies. CONCLUSION The economic crisis may create an opportunity to further strengthen the evidence base of health care decision-making in Hungary. In the forthcoming period ISPOR Hungary Chapter may play an even more crucial role in improving the standards of HTA implementation and facilitating international collaboration with other CEE countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltán Kaló
- Health Economics Research Centre, Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Budapest, Hungary; Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.
| | | | - Imre Boncz
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Faculty of Economics, Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment Research Centre, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csaba Dózsa
- Health Care Faculty, University of Miskolc, Miskolc, Hungary
| | - Gabriella Jóna
- National Institute for Quality- and Organizational Development in Healthcare and Medicines, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Rita Kövi
- National Institute for Quality- and Organizational Development in Healthcare and Medicines, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|