1
|
Twea P, Watkins D, Norheim OF, Munthali B, Young S, Chiwaula L, Manthalu G, Nkhoma D, Hangoma P. The economic costs of orthopaedic services: a health system cost analysis of tertiary hospitals in a low-income country. Health Econ Rev 2024; 14:13. [PMID: 38367132 PMCID: PMC10874068 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00485-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic injuries are rising globally, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries, constituting 88% of the burden of surgically treatable conditions. While contributing to the highest burden, LMICs also have the least availability of resources to address this growing burden effectively. Studies on the cost-of-service provision in these settings have concentrated on the most common traumatic injuries, leaving an evidence gap on other traumatic injuries. This study aimed to address the gap in understanding the cost of orthopaedic services in low-income settings by conducting a comprehensive costing analysis in two tertiary-level hospitals in Malawi. METHODS We used a mixed costing methodology, utilising both Top-Down and Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing approaches. Data on resource utilisation, personnel costs, medicines, supplies, capital costs, laboratory costs, radiology service costs, and overhead costs were collected for one year, from July 2021 to June 2022. We conducted a retrospective review of all the available patient files for the period under review. Assumptions on the intensity of service use were based on utilisation patterns observed in patient records. All costs were expressed in 2021 United States Dollars. RESULTS We conducted a review of 2,372 patient files, 72% of which were male. The median length of stay for all patients was 9.5 days (8-11). The mean weighted cost of treatment across the entire pathway varied, ranging from $195 ($136-$235) for Supracondylar Fractures to $711 ($389-$931) for Proximal Ulna Fractures. The main cost components were personnel (30%) and medicines and supplies (23%). Within diagnosis-specific costs, the length of stay was the most significant cost driver, contributing to the substantial disparity in treatment costs between the two hospitals. CONCLUSION This study underscores the critical role of orthopaedic care in LMICs and the need for context-specific cost data. It highlights the variation in cost drivers and resource utilisation patterns between hospitals, emphasising the importance of tailored healthcare planning and resource allocation approaches. Understanding the costs of surgical interventions in LMICs can inform policy decisions and improve access to essential orthopaedic services, potentially reducing the disease burden associated with trauma-related injuries. We recommend that future studies focus on evaluating the cost-effectiveness of orthopaedic interventions, particularly those that have not been analysed within the existing literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pakwanja Twea
- University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
- Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
| | | | | | - Boston Munthali
- Lilongwe Institute of Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Sven Young
- Lilongwe Institute of Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | | | | | | | - Peter Hangoma
- University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Chr. Michelson Institute (CMI), Bergen, Norway
- University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sharma L, Heung S, Twea P, Yoon I, Nyondo J, Laviwa D, Kasinje K, Connolly E, Nkhoma D, Chindamba M, Tebeje MT, Brady E, Gunda A, Chirwa E, Manthalu G. Donor coordination to support universal health coverage in Malawi. Health Policy Plan 2024; 39:i118-i124. [PMID: 38253443 PMCID: PMC10803193 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czad102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Development assistance is a major source of financing for health in least developed countries. However, persistent aid fragmentation has led to inefficiencies and health inequities and constrained progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Malawi is a case study for this global challenge, with 55% of total health expenditure funded by donors and fragmentation across 166 financing sources and 265 implementing partners. This often leads to poor coordination and misalignment between government priorities and donor projects. To address these challenges, the Malawi Ministry of Health (MoH) has developed and implemented an architecture of aid coordination tools and processes. Using a case study approach, we documented the iterative development, implementation and institutionalization of these tools, which was led by the MoH with technical assistance from the Clinton Health Access Initiative. We reviewed the grey literature, including relevant policy documents, planning tools and databases of government/partner funding commitments, and drew upon the authors' experiences in designing, implementing and scaling up these tools. Overall, the iterative use and revision of these tools by the Government of Malawi across the national and subnational levels, including integration with the government's public financial management system, was critical to successful uptake. The tools are used to inform government and partner resource allocation decisions, assess financing and gaps for national and district plans and inform donor grant applications. As Malawi has launched the Health Sector Strategic Plan 2023-2030, these tools are being adapted for the 'One Plan, One Budget and One Report' approach. However, while the tools are an incremental mechanism to strengthen aid alignment, success has been constrained by the larger context of power imbalances and misaligned incentives between the donor community and the Government of Malawi. Reform of the aid architecture is therefore critical to ensure that these tools achieve maximum impact in Malawi's journey towards UHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Sharma
- Health Systems Strengthening, Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Lilongwe, Private Bag 341, Malawi
| | - Stephanie Heung
- Sustainable Health Financing and Health Workforce, Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Lilongwe, Private Bag 341, Malawi
| | - Pakwanja Twea
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Ian Yoon
- Former Health Systems Strengthening, Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Lilongwe, Private Bag 341, Malawi
| | - Jean Nyondo
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Dalitso Laviwa
- Sustainable Health Financing, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Blantyre, Private Bag 341, Malawi
| | - Kenasi Kasinje
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Emilia Connolly
- Partnerships, Policy and Advocacy, Partners In Health, Neno, Malawi
| | - Dominic Nkhoma
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Madalitso Chindamba
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Mihereteab Teshome Tebeje
- Health Systems Strengthening, Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Lilongwe, Private Bag 341, Malawi
| | - Eoghan Brady
- Health Financing, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts 02127, United States
| | - Andrews Gunda
- Country Director, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Lilongwe Private Bag 341, Malawi
| | - Emily Chirwa
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Gerald Manthalu
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ahmed S, Cao Y, Wang Z, Coates MM, Twea P, Ma M, Chiwanda Banda J, Wroe E, Bai L, Watkins DA, Su Y. Service readiness for the management of non-communicable diseases in publicly financed facilities in Malawi: findings from the 2019 Harmonised Health Facility Assessment census survey. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e072511. [PMID: 38176873 PMCID: PMC10773330 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are rising in low-income and middle-income countries, including Malawi. To inform policy-makers and planners on the preparedness of the Malawian healthcare system to respond to NCDs, we estimated NCD service readiness in publicly financed healthcare facilities in Malawi. METHODS We analysed data from 564 facilities surveyed in the 2019 Harmonised Health Facility Assessment, including 512 primary healthcare (PHC) and 52 secondary and tertiary care (STC) facilities. To characterise service readiness, applying the law of minimum, we estimated the percentage of facilities with functional equipment and unexpired medicines required to provide NCD services. Further, we estimated permanently unavailable items to identify service readiness bottlenecks. RESULTS Fewer than 40% of PHC facilities were ready to deliver services for each of the 14 NCDs analysed. Insulin and beclomethasone inhalers had the lowest stock levels at PHC facilities (6% and 8%, respectively). Only 17% of rural and community hospitals (RCHs) have liver and kidney diagnostics. STC facilities had varying service readiness, ranging from 27% for managing acute diabetes complications to 94% for chronic type 2 diabetes management. Only 38% of STC facilities were ready to manage chronic heart failure. Oral pain medicines were widely available at all levels of health facilities; however, only 22% of RCHs and 29% of STCs had injectable morphine or pethidine. Beclomethasone was never available at 74% of PHC and 29% of STC facilities. CONCLUSION Publicly financed facilities in Malawi are generally unprepared to provide NCD services, especially at the PHC level. Targeted investments in PHC can substantially improve service readiness for chronic NCD conditions in local communities and enable STC to respond to acute NCD complications and more complex NCD cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sali Ahmed
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Yanjia Cao
- Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Zicheng Wang
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew M Coates
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Pakwanja Twea
- Bergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Mingyang Ma
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jonathan Chiwanda Banda
- Curative and Medical Rehabilitation Services, Ministry of Health, lilongwe, Malawi
- Department of Community and Environmental Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Emily Wroe
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lan Bai
- Department of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - David A Watkins
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Yanfang Su
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Connolly E, Mohan S, Twea P, Msuku T, Kees A, Sharma L, Heung S, Nkhoma D, Manthalu G. Revision of Malawi's Health Benefits Package: A Critical Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation. Value Health Reg Issues 2024; 39:84-94. [PMID: 38041898 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health benefits packages (HBPs), which define specific health services that can be offered for free or at a reduced cost to fit within public revenues, have been recommended for over 30 years to maximize population health in resource-limited settings. However, there remain gaps in defining and operationalizing HBPs. We propose a combination of design and prioritization methods along with practical strategies to improve the implementation of future iterations of the HBP in Malawi. METHODS For HBP development for Malawi's Third Health Sector Strategic Plan, we combined cost-effectiveness analysis with a quantitative, consultative multicriteria decision analysis. Throughout the process of development, we documented challenges and opportunities to improve HBP design and application. RESULTS The primary and secondary HBP included 115 interventions. However, the definition of an HBP is just one step toward focusing limited resources, with functional operationalization as the most critical component. Full implementation of previous HBPs has been limited by challenges in aid coordination with the misalignment of nonfungible vertical donor funding for the HBP without accounting for the complexity and interconnectedness of the health system. Opportunities for improved application include creation of a complementary minimum health service package to guide overall resource inputs through an integrative approach. CONCLUSIONS We believe that expanded participatory HBP methods that consider value, equity, and social considerations, along with a shift to providing integrated health service packages at all levels of care, will improve the efficiency of using scarce resources along the journey to universal health coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Connolly
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi; Partners In Health/Abwenzi Pa Za Umoyo, Neno, Malawi; Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH, USA.
| | - Sakshi Mohan
- Center for Health Economics, University of York, York, England, UK
| | - Pakwanja Twea
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Thulasoni Msuku
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Andreas Kees
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Lalit Sharma
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | | | - Dominic Nkhoma
- Health Economics Policy Unit, Kamuzu University for Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Gerald Manthalu
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mfutso-Bengo J, Nkungula N, Mnjowe E, Ng'ambi W, Jeremiah F, Kasende- Chinguwo F, Meckson Bickton F, Nkhoma D, Chinkhumba J, Mboma S, Ngwira L, Juma M, Kazanga-Chiumia I, Twea P, Manthalu G. Proposing the "Value- and Evidence-Based decision making and Practice" (VEDMAP) framework for Priority-Setting and knowledge translation in low and Middle-Income Countries: A novel framework for Decision-Making in Low-and middle income countries like Malawi. Health Policy Open 2023; 4:100094. [PMID: 37383887 PMCID: PMC10297823 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The existence and availability of evidence on its own does not guarantee that the evidence will be demanded and used by decision and policy makers. Decision and policy-makers, especially in low-income settings, often confront ethical dilemmas about determining the best available evidence and its utilization. This dilemma can be in the form of conflict of evidence, scientific and ethical equipoise and competing evidence or interests. Consequently, decisions are made based on convenience, personal preference, donor requirements, and political and social considerations which can result in wastage of resources and inefficiency. To mitigate these challenges, the use of "Value- and Evidence-Based Decision Making and Practice" (VEDMAP) framework is proposed. This framework was developed by Joseph Mfutso-Bengo in 2017 through a desk review. It was pretested through a scoping study under the Thanzi la Onse (TLO) Project which assessed the feasibility and acceptability of using the VEDMAP as a priority setting tool for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Malawi. The study used mixed methods whereby it conducted a desk review to map out and benchmark normative values of different countries in Africa and HTA; focus group discussion and key informant interviews to map out the actual (practised) values in Malawi. The results of this review confirmed that the use of VEDMAP framework was feasible and acceptable and can bring efficiency, traceability, transparency and integrity in decision- policy making process and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Mfutso-Bengo
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Centre of Bioethics in Eastern and Southern Africa, Blantyre, Malawi
- Centre of Excellence in Ethics and Governance, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Nthanda Nkungula
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Centre of Bioethics in Eastern and Southern Africa, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Emmanuel Mnjowe
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Wingston Ng'ambi
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Faless Jeremiah
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Florence Kasende- Chinguwo
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Fanuel Meckson Bickton
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
- UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dominic Nkhoma
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Jobiba Chinkhumba
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Sebastian Mboma
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Lucky Ngwira
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Mercy Juma
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Isabel Kazanga-Chiumia
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Pakwanja Twea
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Malawi
| | - Gerald Manthalu
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Colbourn T, Janoušková E, Li Lin I, Collins J, Connolly E, Graham M, Jewel B, Kachale F, Mangal T, Manthalu G, Mfutso‐Bengo J, Mnjowe E, Mohan S, Molaro M, Ng'ambi W, Nkhoma D, Revill P, She B, Manning Smith R, Twea P, Tamuri A, Phillips A, Hallett TB. Modeling Contraception and Pregnancy in Malawi: A Thanzi La Onse Mathematical Modeling Study. Stud Fam Plann 2023; 54:585-607. [PMID: 38129327 PMCID: PMC10941698 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Malawi has high unmet need for contraception with a costed national plan to increase contraception use. Estimating how such investments might impact future population size in Malawi can help policymakers understand effects and value of policies to increase contraception uptake. We developed a new model of contraception and pregnancy using individual-level data capturing complexities of contraception initiation, switching, discontinuation, and failure by contraception method, accounting for differences by individual characteristics. We modeled contraception scale-up via a population campaign to increase initiation of contraception (Pop) and a postpartum family planning intervention (PPFP). We calibrated the model without new interventions to the UN World Population Prospects 2019 medium variant projection of births for Malawi. Without interventions Malawi's population passes 60 million in 2084; with Pop and PPFP interventions. it peaks below 35 million by 2100. We compare contraception coverage and costs, by method, with and without interventions, from 2023 to 2050. We estimate investments in contraception scale-up correspond to only 0.9 percent of total health expenditure per capita though could result in dramatic reductions of current pressures of very rapid population growth on health services, schools, land, and society, helping Malawi achieve national and global health and development goals.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mfutso-Bengo J, Jeremiah F, Kasende-Chinguwo F, Ng'ambi W, Nkungula N, Kazanga-Chiumia I, Juma M, Chawani M, Chinkhumba J, Twea P, Chirwa E, Langwe K, Manthalu G, Ngwira LG, Nkhoma D, Colbourn T, Revill P, Sculpher M. A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:353. [PMID: 37041590 PMCID: PMC10088659 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Malawi. METHODS This study employed a document review and qualitative research methods, to understand the status of HTA in Malawi. This was complemented by a review of the status and nature of HTA institutionalization in selected countries.Qualitative research employed a Focus Group Discussion (FGD ) with 7 participants, and Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with12 informants selected based on their knowledge and expertise in policy processes related to HTA in Malawi.Data extracted from the literature was organized in Microsoft Excel, categorized according to thematic areas and analyzed using a literature review framework. Qualitative data from KIIs and the FGD was analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS Some HTA processes exist and are executed through three structures namely: Ministry of Health Senior Management Team, Technical Working Groups, and Pharmacy and Medicines Regulatory Authority (PMRA) with varyingdegrees of effectiveness.The main limitations of current HTA mechanisms include limited evidence use, lack of a standardized framework for technology adoption, donor pressure, lack of resources for the HTA process and technology acquisition, laws and practices that undermine cost-effectiveness considerations. KII and FGD results showed overwhelming demand for strengthening HTA in Malawi, with a stronger preference for strengthening coordination and capacity of existing entities and structures. CONCLUSION The study has shown that HTA institutionalization is acceptable and feasible in Malawi. However, the current committee based processes are suboptimal to improve efficiency due to lack of a structured framework. A structured HTA framework has the potential to improve processes in pharmaceuticals and medical technologies decision-making.In the short to medium term, HTA capacity building should focus on generating demand and increasing capacity in cost-effectiveness assessments. Country-specific assessments should precede HTA institutionalization as well as recommendations for new technology adoptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Mfutso-Bengo
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi.
- Centre of Bioethics in Eastern and Southern Africa, Blantyre, Malawi.
| | - Faless Jeremiah
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Florence Kasende-Chinguwo
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Wingston Ng'ambi
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Centre of Excellence in Ethics and Governance, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Nthanda Nkungula
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Isabel Kazanga-Chiumia
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Mercy Juma
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Marlen Chawani
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Jobiba Chinkhumba
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Pakwanja Twea
- Ministry of Health, Malawi Government, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Emily Chirwa
- Ministry of Health, Malawi Government, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Kate Langwe
- Ministry of Health, Malawi Government, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | | | - Lucky Gift Ngwira
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Dominic Nkhoma
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Tim Colbourn
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Revill
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Sculpher
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ramponi F, Twea P, Chilima B, Nkhoma D, Kazanga Chiumia I, Manthalu G, Mfutso-Bengo J, Revill P, Drummond M, Sculpher M. Assessing the potential of HTA to inform resource allocation decisions in low-income settings: The case of Malawi. Front Public Health 2022; 10:1010702. [PMID: 36388387 PMCID: PMC9650047 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1010702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Health technology assessment (HTA) offers a set of analytical tools to support health systems' decisions about resource allocation. Although there is increasing interest in these tools across the world, including in some middle-income countries, they remain rarely used in low-income countries (LICs). In general, the focus of HTA is narrow, mostly limited to assessments of efficacy and cost-effectiveness. However, the principles of HTA can be used to support a broader series of decisions regarding new health technologies. We examine the potential for this broad use of HTA in LICs, with a focus on Malawi. We develop a framework to classify the main decisions on health technologies within health systems. The framework covers decisions on identifying and prioritizing technologies for detailed assessment, deciding whether to adopt an intervention, assessing alternative investments for implementation and scale-up, and undertaking further research activities. We consider the relevance of the framework to policymakers in Malawi and we use two health technologies as examples to investigate the main barriers and enablers to the use of HTA methods. Although the scarcity of local data, expertise, and other resources could risk limiting the operationalisation of HTA in LICs, we argue that even in highly resource constrained health systems, such as in Malawi, the use of HTA to support a broad range of decisions is feasible and desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ramponi
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom
- ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pakwanja Twea
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Benson Chilima
- Public Health Institute, Ministry of Health Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Dominic Nkhoma
- Health Economics and Policy Unit (HEPU), College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi
| | - Isabel Kazanga Chiumia
- Health Economics and Policy Unit (HEPU), College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi
| | - Gerald Manthalu
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Joseph Mfutso-Bengo
- Health Economics and Policy Unit (HEPU), College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi
| | - Paul Revill
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Drummond
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Sculpher
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yoon I, Twea P, Heung S, Mohan S, Mandalia N, Razzaq S, Berman L, Brady E, Gunda A, Manthalu G. Health Sector Resource Mapping in Malawi: Sharing the Collection and Use of Budget Data for Evidence-Based Decision Making. Glob Health Sci Pract 2021; 9:793-803. [PMID: 34933976 PMCID: PMC8691869 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-21-00232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
By tracking budgets for health through its annual resource mapping exercise, the Government of Malawi generated evidence for planning and budgeting, quantifying resource needs, mobilizing funds to fill financial gaps, and coordinating investments across stakeholders with different priorities toward common goals. The exercise was adapted to conduct COVID-19 resource mapping to inform planning and coordination of the national pandemic response. Background: In 2011, the Ministry of Health in Malawi developed and institutionalized a resource-tracking process, known as resource mapping (RM), to collect information on planned funding flows across the health sector to support resource allocation and mobilization decisions. We analyze the RM process and tools and describe key uses of the data for health financing decision making to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). Methods: We applied a case study approach, written as a collaboration between policy makers who have led the RM process in Malawi and the implementation team who have developed tools, collected data, and reported results over the period. It draws on our experiences in conducting RM in Malawi to document the RM process and data, key uses of data, implementation challenges, and lessons learned. We conducted a gray literature review to understand rounds of RM in which we did not participate. Finally, we conducted a search of published literature to situate our work in the international health resource-tracking literature. Results: The RM exercise in Malawi is iteratively designed around the needs of the end users and policy priorities of the government, which in turn drives institutionalization of the exercise. We describe 4 ways in which RM data has been used, including national and district planning and budgeting; prioritization and coordination of existing funds by estimating resource availability; mobilization of new resources by conducting financial gap analysis against costed national strategic plans; and generation of evidence to support the national response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Discussion: To achieve UHC goals in Malawi, RM has equipped the government and development partners with critical data used for resource mobilization and coordination decisions. Lessons learned from RM in Malawi may be applicable to other countries starting or refining their own health resource-tracking exercise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Yoon
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Malawi.
| | | | | | - Sakshi Mohan
- Ministry of Health, Government of Malawi, Malawi
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
McGuire F, Revill P, Twea P, Mohan S, Manthalu G, Smith PC. Allocating resources to support universal health coverage: development of a geographical funding formula in Malawi. BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5:e002763. [PMID: 32938613 PMCID: PMC7493092 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Universal health coverage (UHC) requires that local health sector institutions-such as local authorities-are properly funded to fulfil their service delivery commitments. In this study, we examine how formula funding can align sub-national resource allocations with national priorities. This is illustrated by outlining alternative options for using mathematical formula to guide the allocation of national drug and service delivery budgets to district councils in Malawi in 2018/2019. METHODS We use demographic, epidemiological and health sector budget data with information on implementation constraints to construct three variant allocation formulae. The first gives an equal per capita allocation to each district, and is included as a baseline to compare alternatives. The second allocates funds to districts using estimates of the resources required to provide Malawi's essential health package of priority cost-effective interventions to the full population in need of each intervention. The third adjusts these estimates to reflect a practicable level of attainable coverage for each intervention, based on the current configurations of health services and demand for interventions. FINDINGS Compared with current district allocations, not underpinned by an explicit formula, the formulae presented in this study suggest sizeable shifts in the allocations received by many districts. In some cases, the magnitude of these shifts exceed 50% reductions or doubling of district budgets. The large shifts illustrate inequities in the current system of budget allocation and the potential improvements possible. CONCLUSION The use of mathematical formulae can guide the efficient and equitable allocation of healthcare funds to local health authorities. The formulae developed were facilitated by the existence of an explicit package of priority interventions. The approach can be replicated in wide range of countries seeking to achieve UHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finn McGuire
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
- Department of Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Revill
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Pakwanja Twea
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Sakshi Mohan
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Gerald Manthalu
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Peter C Smith
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
- Imperial College Business School, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Twea P, Manthalu G, Mohan S. Allocating resources to support universal health coverage: policy processes and implementation in Malawi. BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5:e002766. [PMID: 32843526 PMCID: PMC7449351 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Optimising the use of limited health resources in low-income and middle-income countries towards the maximisation of health outcomes requires efficient distribution of resources across health services and geographical areas. While technical research exists on how efficiencies can be achieved in resource allocation, there is limited guidance on the policy processes required to convert these technical inputs into practicable solutions. In this article, we discuss Malawi's experience in 2019 of revising its resource allocation formula (RAF) for the geographical distribution of the government health sector budget to the decentralised units in-charge of delivering primary and secondary healthcare. The policy process to revise the RAF in Malawi was initiated by district assemblies seeking a more equitable distribution of government resources, with the Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP) leading the technical and deliberative work. This article discusses all the steps undertaken by MOHP, Malawi to date as well as the steps necessary looking forward to legally establish the newly developed RAF and to start implementing it. We highlight the practical and political considerations in ensuring the acceptability and implementation feasibility of a revised RAF. It is hoped that this discussion will serve as guidance to other countries undergoing a revision of their resource allocation frameworks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pakwanja Twea
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Gerald Manthalu
- Department of Planning and Policy Development, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Sakshi Mohan
- Center for Health Economics (CHE), University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|