1
|
Catalano G, Alaimo L, Chatzipanagiotou OP, Ruzzenente A, Aucejo F, Marques HP, Bhimani N, Hugh T, Maithel SK, Kitago M, Endo I, Pawlik TM. Advantage of Log Odds of Metastatic Lymph Nodes After Curative-Intent Resection of Gallbladder Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:1742-1751. [PMID: 39542966 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16492-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is among the most important predictors of poor prognosis after surgery for gallbladder cancer (GBC). Traditionally, staging has been based on the raw count of LNM, with a high risk of understaging patients who undergo inadequate lymph node dissection (LND). The log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) may represent an alternative staging approach to stratify patients more accurately after resection of GBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this cross-sectional study, patients who underwent curative-intent surgery with LND for GBC were identified from an international database. Two predictive models were built and compared, each integrating a different lymph nodes status indicator [i.e., American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and LODDS]. RESULTS Among 199 patients, the median number of lymph nodes examined was 5 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.0, 8.0]; most patients had T1 (n = 26, 13.1%) or T2 (n = 97, 48.7%) disease, and a subset had LNM (n = 87, 44.0%). Multivariable Cox analysis demonstrated LODDS was an independent predictor of overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-2.3; p < 0.001]. The LODDS model demonstrated better performance compared with a traditional model that utilized the AJCC N category [concordance (C) index: 0.814 versus 0.763; p < 0.001]. Patients classified as high- versus low-risk based on LODDS had much worse overall survival (OS) (4.9% versus 83.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). The LODDS model performance remained high even among patients with inadequate LND (< 6 LN) (C index: 0.87). An online calculator was developed ( https://catalano-giovanni.shinyapps.io/LoddsGBC/ ). CONCLUSIONS A novel prognostic model based on LODDS may overcome the inherent limitations of the current AJCC staging system, reducing understaging among patients with fewer than six total lymph nodes evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Catalano
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Alaimo
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Odysseas P Chatzipanagiotou
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Federico Aucejo
- Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Hugo P Marques
- Department of Surgery, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nazim Bhimani
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tom Hugh
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Minoru Kitago
- Department of Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rawal N, Hariprasad G, Bandyopadhyay S, Dash NR, Kumar S, Das P, Dey S, Khan MA, Ranjan A, Chopra A, Saluja S, Hussain S, Rath GK, Kaur T, Tanwar P. Molecular biomarkers involved in the progression of gallbladder inflammatory lesions to invasive cancer: A proteomic approach. BIOMOLECULES & BIOMEDICINE 2024; 25:115-143. [PMID: 39284282 PMCID: PMC11647257 DOI: 10.17305/bb.2024.10704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
The progression of gallbladder inflammatory lesions to invasive cancer remains poorly understood, necessitating research on biomarkers involved in this transition. This study aims to identify and validate proteins associated with this progression, offering insights into potential diagnostic biomarkers for gallbladder cancer (GBC). Label-free liquid chromatography-assisted tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) proteomics was performed on samples from ten cases each of GBC and inflammatory lesions, with technical duplicates. Validation was conducted through the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using 80 samples (40 GBC and 40 inflammatory lesions). Bioinformatics tools analyzed protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and pathways. Statistical correlations with clinicopathological variables were assessed. Prognostic evaluation utilized Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analyses. mRNA expressions were studied using real-time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Out of 5714 proteins analyzed, 621 were differentially expressed. Three upregulated (the S100 calcium-binding protein P [S100P], polymeric immunoglobulin receptor [PIGR], and complement C1q-binding protein [C1QBP]) and two downregulated (transgelin [TAGLN] and calponin 1 [CNN1]) proteins showed significant expression. Pathway analysis implicated involvement of proteoglycans in cancer and glycosaminoglycan metabolism. Significant correlations were observed between protein concentrations and clinicopathological variables. Prognostic factors, such as tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and preoperative bilirubin levels were associated with overall survival (OS). Protein-based assays demonstrated higher resolution compared to mRNA analysis, suggesting their utility in GBC risk stratification. S100P, PIGR, C1QBP, TAGLN, and CNN1 emerge as potential protein-based biomarkers involved in the progression from gallbladder inflammatory lesions to invasive cancer. These findings hold promise for improved diagnostic and prognostic strategies in GBC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neetu Rawal
- Laboratory Oncology Unit, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Gururao Hariprasad
- Department of Biophysics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay
- Proteomics Laboratory, Centralized Core Research Facility, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Nihar Ranjan Dash
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sunil Kumar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Prasenjit Das
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sharmistha Dey
- Department of Biophysics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Maroof Ahmad Khan
- Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Amar Ranjan
- Laboratory Oncology Unit, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Anita Chopra
- Laboratory Oncology Unit, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sundeep Saluja
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Showket Hussain
- Division of Molecular Oncology, National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
| | - GK Rath
- Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Tanvir Kaur
- Division of Non-Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Pranay Tanwar
- Laboratory Oncology Unit, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Palepu J, Endo I, Chaudhari VA, Murthy GVS, Chaudhuri S, Adam R, Smith M, de Reuver PR, Lendoire J, Shrikhande SV, De Aretxabala X, Sirohi B, Kokudo N, Kwon W, Pal S, Bouzid C, Dixon E, Shah SR, Maroni R, Nervi B, Mengoa C, Patil S, Ebata T, Maithel SK, Lang H, Primrose J, Hirano S, Guevara OA, Ohtsuka M, Valle JW, Sharma A, Nagarajan G, Núñez Ju JJ, Arroyo GF, Torrez SL, Erdmann JI, Butte JM, Furuse J, Lee SE, Gomes AP, Park SJ, Jang JY, Oddi R, Barreto SG, Kijima H, Ciacio O, Gowda NS, Jarnagin W. 'IHPBA-APHPBA clinical practice guidelines': international Delphi consensus recommendations for gallbladder cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:1311-1326. [PMID: 39191539 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.07.411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Revised: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Delphi consensus study was carried out under the auspices of the International and Asia-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Associations (IHPBA-APHPBA) to develop practice guidelines for management of gallbladder cancer (GBC) globally. METHOD GBC experts from 17 countries, spanning 6 continents, participated in a hybrid four-round Delphi consensus development process. The methodology involved email, online consultations, and in-person discussions. Sixty eight clinical questions (CQs) covering various domains related to GBC, were administered to the experts. A consensus recommendation was accepted only when endorsed by more than 75% of the participating experts. RESULTS Out of the sixty experts invited initially to participate in the consensus process 45 (75%) responded to the invitation. The consensus was achieved in 92.6% (63/68) of the CQs. Consensus covers epidemiological aspects of GBC, early, incidental and advanced GBC management, definitions for radical GBC resections, the extent of liver resection, lymph node dissection, and definitions of borderline resectable and locally advanced GBC. CONCLUSIONS This is the first international Delphi consensus on GBC. These recommendations provide uniform terminology and practical clinical guidelines on the current management of GBC. Unresolved contentious issues like borderline resectable/locally advanced GBC need to be addressed by future clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jagannath Palepu
- Continental Cancer Centre, Continental Hospitals, Hyderabad, India; Dept. of Surgical Oncology Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre and SL Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, India.
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Vikram Anil Chaudhari
- GI and HPB Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - G V S Murthy
- PRASHO Foundation, Hyderabad, India; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Rene Adam
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Cancer and Transplantation, AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse / Univ Paris-Saclay, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France
| | - Martin Smith
- Surgery, University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Javier Lendoire
- HPB & Liver Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- GI and HPB Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Bhawna Sirohi
- Medical Oncology, Vedanta Medical Research foundation (Balco Medical Centre), Raipur, India
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sujoy Pal
- Deptt of GI Surgery and Liver transplantation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Chafik Bouzid
- HPB and Digestive Oncology Surgery, Dept. of Surgical Oncology, DBK anti cancer center, Mouloud Mammeri University, Tizi Ouzou, Algeria
| | - Elijah Dixon
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Rodrigo Maroni
- Head of Program of Surgery, Hospital Papa Francisco, Salta, Argentina
| | - Bruno Nervi
- Chief Department, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Claudio Mengoa
- Surgery, Instituto Regional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Arequipa, Peru
| | | | - Tomoki Ebata
- Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - Hauke Lang
- Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - John Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Oscar A Guevara
- Surgery, Universidad Nacional de Colombia / Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Juan W Valle
- Chief Medical Officer, Research Department, Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation, Herriman, UT, USA
| | - Atul Sharma
- Medical Oncology, Max Institute Of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | - Ganesh Nagarajan
- Surgical oncology ( GI and HPB), Nanavati Max hospital mumbai, Mumbai, India
| | - Juan Jose Núñez Ju
- HPB General Surgery Service, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara, Lima, Peru
| | | | | | | | - Jean M Butte
- Surgery, Instituto Oncologico FALP, Santiago, Chile
| | - Junji Furuse
- Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Seung Eun Lee
- Department of surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - António Pedro Gomes
- Surgery Department, Hospital Vila Franca de Xira, Vila Franca de Xira, Portugal
| | - Sang-Jae Park
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, South Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ricardo Oddi
- Center for Clinical Medical Education and Research (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Savio George Barreto
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Austraila
| | - Hiroshi Kijima
- Department of Pathology and Bioscience, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
| | - Oriana Ciacio
- Centre Hépato-Biliaire, AP-HP - Hôpital Paul Brousse / Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Nagesh S Gowda
- Institute of Gastroenterology and Organ Transplantation, Bengaluru, India
| | - William Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guo Z, Zhang Z, Liu L, Zhao Y, Liu Z, Zhang C, Qi H, Feng J, Yao P, Yuan H. Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Distant Metastasis of T1 and T2 Gallbladder Cancer Based on SEER Database. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:927. [PMID: 39329669 PMCID: PMC11428592 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11090927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: This study seeks to employ a machine learning (ML) algorithm to forecast the risk of distant metastasis (DM) in patients with T1 and T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC); (2) Methods: Data of patients diagnosed with T1 and T2 GBC was obtained from SEER, encompassing the period from 2004 to 2015, were utilized to apply seven ML algorithms. These algorithms were appraised by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and other metrics; (3) Results: This study involved 4371 patients in total. Out of these patients, 764 (17.4%) cases progressed to develop DM. Utilizing a logistic regression (LR) model to identify independent risk factors for DM of gallbladder cancer (GBC). A nomogram has been developed to forecast DM in early T-stage gallbladder cancer patients. Through the evaluation of different models using relevant indicators, it was discovered that Random Forest (RF) exhibited the most outstanding predictive performance; (4) Conclusions: RF has demonstrated high accuracy in predicting DM in gallbladder cancer patients, assisting clinical physicians in enhancing the accuracy of diagnosis. This can be particularly valuable for improving patient outcomes and optimizing treatment strategies. We employ the RF algorithm to construct the corresponding web calculator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhentian Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, State Grid Corporation of China, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100073, China; (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.Z.); (Z.L.); (C.Z.); (H.Q.)
- Key Laboratory of Geriatrics (Hepatobiliary Diseases) of China General Technology Group, Beijing 100073, China; (J.F.); (P.Y.)
| | - Zongming Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, State Grid Corporation of China, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100073, China; (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.Z.); (Z.L.); (C.Z.); (H.Q.)
- Key Laboratory of Geriatrics (Hepatobiliary Diseases) of China General Technology Group, Beijing 100073, China; (J.F.); (P.Y.)
| | - Limin Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, State Grid Corporation of China, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100073, China; (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.Z.); (Z.L.); (C.Z.); (H.Q.)
- Key Laboratory of Geriatrics (Hepatobiliary Diseases) of China General Technology Group, Beijing 100073, China; (J.F.); (P.Y.)
| | - Yue Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, State Grid Corporation of China, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100073, China; (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.Z.); (Z.L.); (C.Z.); (H.Q.)
- Key Laboratory of Geriatrics (Hepatobiliary Diseases) of China General Technology Group, Beijing 100073, China; (J.F.); (P.Y.)
| | - Zhuo Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, State Grid Corporation of China, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100073, China; (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.Z.); (Z.L.); (C.Z.); (H.Q.)
- Key Laboratory of Geriatrics (Hepatobiliary Diseases) of China General Technology Group, Beijing 100073, China; (J.F.); (P.Y.)
| | - Chong Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, State Grid Corporation of China, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100073, China; (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.Z.); (Z.L.); (C.Z.); (H.Q.)
- Key Laboratory of Geriatrics (Hepatobiliary Diseases) of China General Technology Group, Beijing 100073, China; (J.F.); (P.Y.)
| | - Hui Qi
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, State Grid Corporation of China, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100073, China; (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.Z.); (Z.L.); (C.Z.); (H.Q.)
- Key Laboratory of Geriatrics (Hepatobiliary Diseases) of China General Technology Group, Beijing 100073, China; (J.F.); (P.Y.)
| | - Jinqiu Feng
- Key Laboratory of Geriatrics (Hepatobiliary Diseases) of China General Technology Group, Beijing 100073, China; (J.F.); (P.Y.)
| | - Peijie Yao
- Key Laboratory of Geriatrics (Hepatobiliary Diseases) of China General Technology Group, Beijing 100073, China; (J.F.); (P.Y.)
| | - Haiming Yuan
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, State Grid Corporation of China, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100073, China; (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.Z.); (Z.L.); (C.Z.); (H.Q.)
- Key Laboratory of Geriatrics (Hepatobiliary Diseases) of China General Technology Group, Beijing 100073, China; (J.F.); (P.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khomiak A, Ghaffar SA, Rodriguez Franco S, Ziogas IA, Cumbler E, Gleisner A, Del Chiaro M, Schulick RD, Mungo B. The impact of lymph node ratio on survival in gallbladder cancer: a national cancer database analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2024:S1365-182X(24)02320-7. [PMID: 39353847 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 06/19/2024] [Revised: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study aimed to investigate the impact of lymph node ratio (LNR) on survival in patients with resectable gallbladder adenocarcinoma. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2020. We included patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma who had undergone resection of the primary site as well as adequate lymphadenectomy. Exclusions comprised patients with distant metastasis and missing key data. LNR was calculated as a proportion of positive lymph nodes (LNs) to examined LNs. RESULTS Patients were stratified into LNR groups: LNR0 - 343 patients (55%); 168 (26.9%) patients with LNR < 30%; and 113 (18.1%) with LNR ≥ 30%. The mean age was 67.3 ± 10.7 years, with 71.6% being female and 75.8% identifying as white. The mean overall survival (OS) was 52.8 months for the LNR0 group, 36.3 months for LNR < 30%, and 27 months for LNR ≥ 30% (p < 0.001). The difference in survival was significant when adjusted for adjuvant chemotherapy status and surgical margins using Cox regression - HR 3.2 (2.4-4.5 95% CI) for LNR < 30% and HR 4.9 (3.5-6.8 95% CI) for LNR ≥ 30%. CONCLUSION The study suggests that LNR is a valuable prognostic factor for resectable gallbladder cancer patients and could potentially guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrii Khomiak
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sumaya A Ghaffar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Salvador Rodriguez Franco
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ioannis A Ziogas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ethan Cumbler
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ana Gleisner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Benedetto Mungo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gupta S, Verma A, Chaturvedi A, Prakash P, Kumar V, Misra S, Akhtar N, Rajan S, Agarwal P, Smith L, Schissel M, Are C. Comparison of Prognostic Performance of 8th and 7th Edition of AJCC Staging System for Patients With Gallbladder Cancer Undergoing Curative Intent Surgery. J Surg Oncol 2024. [PMID: 39257217 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared the predictive performance of the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging systems in stratifying disease-related survival outcomes in patients with GBC undergoing curative intent surgery. METHODS Patients that underwent curative intent surgery for GBC at our institution (2014 and 2021) were included in the study. Various clinico-pathological data were extracted to perform Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 240 patients were included in the study. Both, TNM-7, and TNM-8 staging systems can stratify patients into stages with statistically significant differences in disease-free and overall survival. Survival rates drop with stage progression. Using TNM-8, 8/240 (3.33%) patients were upstaged from Stage IIIB (TNM-7) to IVB (TNM-8) and 12/240 (5%) were down-staged from Stage IVB(TNM-7) to IIIB(TNM-8). Survival curves of the re-classified patients matched those of the corresponding TNM-8 stage. Additionally, there was statistically significant difference in their survival (p < 0.001) compared to their corresponding TNM-7 stage. There was no statistically significant difference in survival rates between stages IIA, IIB (TNM-8), and stage II (TNM-7). However, stage IIA had a slightly better survival than stage IIB. CONCLUSION Though both TNM-7 and TNM-8 are useful for stratifying patients with GBC, TNM-8 has a better prognostic performance than TNM-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Gupta
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India
| | - Abhishek Verma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India
| | - Arun Chaturvedi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India
| | - Puneet Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India
| | - Vijay Kumar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India
| | - Sanjeev Misra
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India
- Vice-Chancellor, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Medical University, Lucknow, India
| | - Naseem Akhtar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India
| | - Shiv Rajan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India
| | - Preeti Agarwal
- Department of Pathology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India
| | - Lynette Smith
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Makayla Schissel
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Chandrakanth Are
- Department of Surgery, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jain V, Sakhuja P, Agarwal AK, Sirdeshmukh R, Siraj F, Gautam P. Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastrointestinal Carcinomas: A View from a Proteomics Perspective. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:4455-4475. [PMID: 39195316 PMCID: PMC11352871 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31080333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is one of the major prognostic factors in human gastrointestinal carcinomas (GICs). The lymph node-positive patients have poorer survival than node-negative patients. LNM is directly associated with the recurrence and poor survival of patients with GICs. The early detection of LNM in patients and designing effective therapies to suppress LNM may significantly impact the survival of these patients. The rapid progress made in proteomic technologies could be successfully applied to identify molecular targets for cancers at high-throughput levels. LC-MS/MS analysis enables the identification of proteins involved in LN metastasis, which can be utilized for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. This review summarizes the studies on LN metastasis in GICs using proteomic approaches to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaishali Jain
- Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Pathology, New Delhi 110029, India
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal 576104, India
| | - Puja Sakhuja
- Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi 110002, India
| | - Anil Kumar Agarwal
- Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi 110002, India
| | - Ravi Sirdeshmukh
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal 576104, India
- Institute of Bioinformatics, International Tech Park, Bangalore 560066, India
| | - Fouzia Siraj
- Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Pathology, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Poonam Gautam
- Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Pathology, New Delhi 110029, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bai S, Yang P, Qiu J, Wang J, Liu L, Wang C, Wang H, Wen Z, Zhang B. Nomograms to predict long-term survival for patients with gallbladder carcinoma after resection. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2024; 7:e1991. [PMID: 38441306 PMCID: PMC10913079 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection remains the primary treatment option for gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). However, there is a pressing demand for prognostic tools that can refine patients' treatment choices and tailor personalized therapies accordingly. AIMS The nomograms were constructed using the data of a training cohort (n = 378) of GBC patients at Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH) between 2008 and 2018. The model's performance was validated in GBC patients (n = 108) at Guangzhou Centre from 2007 to 2018. METHODS AND RESULTS The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in the training cohort was 24.4%. Multivariate analyses were performed using preoperative and postoperative data to identify independent predictors of OS. These predictors were then incorporated into preoperative and postoperative nomograms, respectively. The C-index of the preoperative nomogram was 0.661 (95% CI, 0.627 to 0.694) for OS prediction and correctly delineated four subgroups (5-year OS rates: 48.1%, 19.0%, 15.6%, and 8.1%, p < 0.001). The C-index of the postoperative nomogram was 0.778 (95%CI, 0.756 -0.800). Furthermore, this nomogram was superior to the 8th TNM system in both C-index and the net benefit on decision curve analysis. The results were externally validated. CONCLUSION The two nomograms showed an optimally prognostic prediction in GBC patients after curative-intent resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilei Bai
- Department of Hepatic Surgery IIThe Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Pinghua Yang
- Department of Biliary Surgery IVThe Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Jiliang Qiu
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgerySun Yat‐Sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouChina
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineSun Yat‐Sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery IIThe Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Liu Liu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery IIThe Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Chunyan Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery IIThe Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Huifeng Wang
- Department of Hepatic SurgeryThe Fifth Clinical Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine
| | - Zhijian Wen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Vascular SurgeryThe Chenggong Hospital, Xiamen UniversityXiamenChina
| | - Baohua Zhang
- Department of Biliary Surgery IVThe Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical UniversityShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang J, Liu F, Ma W, Hu H, Li F. Metastatic lymph node ratio as an important prognostic factor in advanced gallbladder carcinoma with at least 6 lymph nodes retrieved. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:382. [PMID: 37770780 PMCID: PMC10539180 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03119-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The metastatic lymph node (LN) ratio (LNR) has shown to be an important prognostic factor in various gastrointestinal malignancies. Nevertheless, the prognostic significance of LNR in gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) remains to be determined. METHODS From January 2007 to January 2018, 144 advanced GBC patients (T2-4 stages) who underwent curative surgery with at least 6 LNs retrieved were enrolled. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to identify the optimal cut-off value for LNR. The clinicopathological features stratified by LNR level were analyzed. Meanwhile, univariate and multivariate Cox regression proportional hazard models were performed to identify risk factors for overall survival (OS). RESULTS The optimal cut-off point for LNR was 0.28 according to the ROC curve. LNR>0.28 was associated with higher rate of D2 LN dissection (P=0.004) and higher tumor stages (P<0.001). Extent of liver resection, extrahepatic bile duct resection, tumor stage, LNR, margin status, tumor differentiation, and perineural invasion were associated with OS in univariate analysis (all P<0.05). GBC patients with LNR≤0.28 had a significantly longer median OS compared to those with LNR>0.28 (27.5 vs 18 months, P=0.004). Multivariate analysis indicated that tumor stage (T2 vs T3/T4; hazard ratio (HR) 1.596; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.195-2.132), LNR (≤0.28 vs >0.28; HR 0.666; 95% CI 0.463-0.958), margin status (R0 vs R1; HR 1.828; 95% CI 1.148-2.910), and tumor differentiation (poorly vs well/moderately; HR 0.670; 95% CI 0.589-0.892) were independent prognostic factors for GBC (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS LNR is correlated to advanced GBC prognosis and is a potential prognostic factor for advanced GBC with at least 6 LNs retrieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junke Wang
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Wenjie Ma
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Haijie Hu
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Fuyu Li
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Toyoda J, Sahara K, Takahashi T, Miyake K, Yabushita Y, Sawada Y, Homma Y, Matsuyama R, Endo I, Pawlik TM. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Survival Analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:2654. [PMID: 37048737 PMCID: PMC10095506 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Although surgery is the mainstay of curative-intent treatment for extrahepatic biliary tract cancer (EBTC), recurrence following surgery can be high and prognosis poor. The impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) relative to upfront surgery (US) among patients with EBTC remains unclear. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases was utilized to identify patients who underwent surgery from 2006 to 2017 for EBTC, including gallbladder cancer (GBC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). Trends in NAT utilization were investigated, and the impact of NAT on prognosis was compared with US using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. Results: Among 6582 EBTC patients (GBC, n = 4467, ECC, n = 2215), 1.6% received NAT; the utilization of NAT for EBTC increased over time (Ptrend = 0.03). Among patients with lymph node metastasis, the lymph node ratio was lower among patients with NAT (0.18 vs. 0.40, p < 0.01). After PSM, there was no difference in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among patients treated with NAT versus US (5-year OS: 24.0% vs. 24.6%, p = 0.14, 5-year CSS: 38.0% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.21). A subgroup analysis revealed that NAT was associated with improved OS and CSS among patients with stages III-IVA of the disease (OS: HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.46-0.92, p = 0.02, CSS: HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.41-0.92, p = 0.01). Conclusions: While NAT did not provide an overall benefit to patients undergoing surgery for EBTC, individuals with advanced-stage disease had improved OS and CSS with NAT. An individualized approach to NAT use among patients with EBTC may provide a survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junya Toyoda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Kota Sahara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Tomoaki Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Kentaro Miyake
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Yabushita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Yu Sawada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Yuki Homma
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Ryusei Matsuyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gholami S, Colby S, Horowitz DP, Guthrie KA, Ben-Josef E, El-Khoueiry AB, Blanke CD, Philip PA, Kachnic LA, Ahmad SA, Rocha FG. Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Lymph Node-Positive Biliary Tract Cancers: Secondary Analysis of a Single-Arm Clinical Trial (SWOG 0809). Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1354-1363. [PMID: 36622529 PMCID: PMC10695673 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12863-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND SWOG 0809 is the only prospective study of adjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation focusing on margin status in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) and gallbladder cancer (GBCA); however, the effects of adjuvant therapy by nodal status have never been reported in this population. METHODS Patients with resected EHCC and GBCA, stage pT2-4, node-positive (N+) or margin-positive (R1) who completed four cycles of chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy were included. Cox regression was used to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence, and distant metastasis by nodal status. DFS rates were compared with historical data via a one-sample t-test. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients [EHCC, n = 46 (66%); GBCA, n = 23 (33%)] were evaluated, with a median age of 61.7 years and an R0 rate of 66.7% and R1 rate of 33.3%. EHCC versus GBCA was more likely to be N+ (73.9% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.03). Nodal status did not significantly impact OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-4.54, p = 0.11) or DFS (HR 1.63, 95% CI 0.77-3.44, p = 0.20). Two-year OS was 70.6% for node-negative (N0) disease and 60.9% for N+ disease, while 2-year DFS was 62.5% for N0 tumors and 49.8% for N+ tumors. N+ versus N0 tumors showed higher rates of distant failure (42.2% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.04). The 2-year DFS rate in N+ tumors was significantly higher than in historical controls (49.8% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant therapy is associated with favorable outcome independent of nodal status and may impact local control in N+ patients. These data could serve as a benchmark for future adjuvant trials, including molecular-targeted agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepideh Gholami
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
| | - Sarah Colby
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David P Horowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Katherine A Guthrie
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anthony B El-Khoueiry
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office, Oregon Health Sciences University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Philip A Philip
- Department of Oncology and Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Flavio G Rocha
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Silva DAGDA, Veloso OLL, Valadares MSP, Costa RSDA, Silveira MG, Carvalho FCDE, Sousa MG. Incidental gallbladder cancer: what is the prevalence and how do we perform cholecystectomy for presumably benign biliary disease? Rev Col Bras Cir 2023; 49:e20223417. [PMID: 36629721 PMCID: PMC10578791 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223417-en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to determine the prevalence of incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) in cholecystectomies performed in a tertiary public hospital and to describe technical and epidemiological aspects of performing cholecystectomies for presumably benign disease. METHOD descriptive, retrospective observational study, based on analysis of medical records of patients undergoing cholecystectomy with preoperative hypothesis of benign disease between January 2018 and January 2022. RESULTS prevalence of gallbladder adenocarcinoma in our sample was 0.16%, similar to data in the literature. Technical aspects during cholecystectomy were also described with a frequency similar to that found in the literature. CONCLUSION despite a rare disease, IGBC is relevant in the routine of the General Surgeon. Its diagnosis, staging and treatment directly affect the prognosis. Technical aspects during cholecystectomy are not always remembered by surgeons and can interfere with the prognosis and subsequent treatment of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Arley Gomes DA Silva
- - Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Departamento de Cirurgia - João Pessoa - PB - Brasil
- - Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP, Disciplina de Cirurgia Torácica - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li Y, Song Y, Zhang Y, Liu S. Progress in gallbladder cancer with lymph node metastasis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:966835. [PMID: 36072797 PMCID: PMC9441950 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.966835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a malignant tumor that originates from the mucosal lining of the gallbladder. It is distinctly regional and is common in certain geographic regions of developing countries. GBC has a high degree of insidiousness as well as a high propensity for metastatic spread, resulting in the majority of patients being diagnosed at an advanced stage. Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is fairly common in GBC patients and is an independent risk factor for a poor prognosis. This article is focused on the lymph node pathways and metastatic directions of GBC. Furthermore, it summarizes the different lymph node groupings, disease stages and treatments. In the future, it is of great significance to develop individualized treatment and predict the outcomes of GBC patients with different lymph node conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Yinghui Song
- Central Laboratory of Hunan Provincial People's Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Yujing Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Sulai Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
- Central Laboratory of Hunan Provincial People's Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
- *Correspondence: Sulai Liu,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tharmalingam S, Flemming J, Richardson H, Hurlbut D, Cleary S, Nanji S. Surgical practice patterns and outcomes in T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer: a population-based study. Can J Surg 2022; 65:E16-E24. [PMID: 35017185 PMCID: PMC8759294 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.019719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The extent of resection required in advanced gallbladder cancer is controversial. We aimed to describe the management and outcomes in patients with resected stage T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer. Methods: In this population-based study, all T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer cases from Jan. 1, 2002, to Mar. 31, 2012, were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry; pathology reports were linked and abstracted. The type of resection was classified as extended (cholecystectomy + liver resection, with or without bile duct resection) or simple (cholecystectomy only). We used Kaplan–Meier survival analysis to model time to death and evaluated factors associated with overall survival using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: A total of 370 patients were included, 232 with T2 disease and 138 with T3 disease. The proportions who underwent extended resection were 24.1% (56/232) and 37.0% (51/138), respectively. The unadjusted 5-year overall survival rates for simple and extended resection were 39.7% and 49.5%, respectively, for T2 disease (p = 0.03), and 13.5% and 22.8%, respectively, for T3 disease (p = 0.05). In adjusted analysis, extended resection significantly improved overall survival among patients with T2 disease (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.97), whereas higher grade of differentiation, presence of lymphovascular invasion and positive lymph nodes led to worse survival. Extended resection was not associated with improved survival in the T3 group; however, in subgroup analysis stratified by lymph node status, a trend toward improved overall survival with extended resection was seen in node-negative patients (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03–1.06). Conclusion: Extended resection improved overall survival in T2 disease regardless of nodal status but appeared most beneficial in node-negative T3 disease. The finding that extended resection was offered only to a small proportion of eligible patients highlights the need for improved knowledge translation at national surgical meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senthuran Tharmalingam
- From the Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Tharmalingam, Nanji); the Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Flemming); the Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Flemming, Richardson); the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Hurlbut); and the Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. (Cleary).
| | - Jennifer Flemming
- From the Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Tharmalingam, Nanji); the Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Flemming); the Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Flemming, Richardson); the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Hurlbut); and the Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. (Cleary)
| | - Harriet Richardson
- From the Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Tharmalingam, Nanji); the Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Flemming); the Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Flemming, Richardson); the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Hurlbut); and the Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. (Cleary)
| | - David Hurlbut
- From the Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Tharmalingam, Nanji); the Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Flemming); the Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Flemming, Richardson); the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Hurlbut); and the Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. (Cleary)
| | - Sean Cleary
- From the Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Tharmalingam, Nanji); the Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Flemming); the Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Flemming, Richardson); the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Hurlbut); and the Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. (Cleary)
| | - Sulaiman Nanji
- From the Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Tharmalingam, Nanji); the Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Flemming); the Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Flemming, Richardson); the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Hurlbut); and the Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. (Cleary)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
SILVA DIEGOARLEYGOMESDA, VELOSO OLGALANUSALEITE, VALADARES MATHEUSSOUTOPERAZZO, COSTA RODRIGOSOARESDA, SILVEIRA MARIANAGALINDO, CARVALHO FERNANDACOSTADE, SOUSA MARCELOGONÇALVES. Câncer incidental de vesícula biliar: qual a prevalência e como operamos a colecistectomia por doença presumidamente benigna? Rev Col Bras Cir 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
RESUMO Objetivos: determinar a prevalência de câncer incidental de vesícula biliar (CIVB) em colecistectomias realizadas em um hospital público terciário e descrever aspectos técnicos e epidemiológicos na realização de colecistectomias por doença presumidamente benigna. Método: estudo observacional descritivo, retrospectivo, a partir da análise de prontuários de pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia com hipótese pré-operatória de doença benigna entre janeiro de 2018 e janeiro de 2022. Resultados: a prevalência de adenocarcinoma de vesícula biliar na amostra avaliada foi de 0,16%, semelhante aos dados da literatura mundial. Os aspectos técnicos durante a realização da colecistectomia também foram descritos com frequência semelhante ao encontrado na literatura. Conclusão: o CIVB é uma doença rara mas de importância relevante na rotina do Cirurgião Geral. Seu diagnóstico, estadiamento e tratamento implicam diretamente no prognóstico. Aspectos técnicos durante a realização da colecistectomia nem sempre são lembrados pelos cirurgiões e podem interferir no prognóstico e tratamento subsequente do paciente.
Collapse
|
16
|
Residual disease in lymph nodes has no influence on survival in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer - institution experience with literature review. Radiol Oncol 2021; 56:208-215. [PMID: 34957726 PMCID: PMC9122290 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A better appreciation of the course and factors that influence incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is needed to develop treatment strategies aimed to improve outcomes. The purpose of the study was to determine the influence of residual disease in the liver and lymph nodes on overall survival in re-resected patients with iGBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients undergoing radical re-resection for iGBC from January 2012 to December 2018 were retrospectively identified. Patients with a 5-year follow-up and submitted to complete resection with stage I, II and III disease were analysed. The influence of residual disease (RD) in liver and lymph nodes on survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier curves. In addition, the rest of the group was assessed based on type of primary/secondary procedure, number of harvested lymph nodes and RD in liver and/or lymph nodes. RESULTS In this retrospective study 48 out of 58 (83%) patients underwent re-resection. Among the group with a 5-year follow-up (re-operation between 2012-2014), 22 patients out of 28 (79%) were re-resected. Survival analysis showed that patients with no RD in the liver and lymph nodes had statistically significant better 5-year survival than those with RD. Comparing 5-year survival rate in patients with RD in the liver or lymph nodes against no RD group, patients with RD in the liver had statistically significantly worse 5-year survival, while lymph node metastases did not show any statistically significant different in 5-year survival. Besides, a statistically significant better prognosis was found in stage II disease compared to stage III, as expected. CONCLUSIONS The most important predictors of a 5-year survival in our study were RD in liver and stage of the disease. Lymph node metastases did not have any impact on the overall 5-year survival rate.
Collapse
|
17
|
Liu X, Liang X, Ruan L, Yan S. A Clinical-Radiomics Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Gallbladder Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:633852. [PMID: 34631512 PMCID: PMC8493033 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.633852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of the current study was to develop and validate a nomogram based on CT radiomics features and clinical variables for predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in gallbladder cancer (GBC). Methods A total of 353 GBC patients from two hospitals were enrolled in this study. A Radscore was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic model based on the radiomics features extracted from the portal venous-phase computed tomography (CT). Four prediction models were constructed based on the training cohort and were validated using internal and external validation cohorts. The most effective model was then selected to build a nomogram. Results The clinical-radiomics nomogram, which comprised Radscore and three clinical variables, showed the best diagnostic efficiency in the training cohort (AUC = 0.851), internal validation cohort (AUC = 0.819), and external validation cohort (AUC = 0.824). Calibration curves showed good discrimination ability of the nomogram using the validation cohorts. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the nomogram had a high clinical utility. Conclusion The findings showed that the clinical-radiomics nomogram based on radiomics features and clinical parameters is a promising tool for preoperative prediction of LN status in patients with GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingyu Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyuan Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lingxiang Ruan
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Sheng Yan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chen C, Rui Z, Yuhan W, Yongjie Z, Yinghe Q, Ning Y, Tianqiang S, Jianying L, Jiangtao L, Xianhai M, Shengping L, Shubin S, Zhiqiang C, Zhaohui T, Zhimin G. Optimal Lymph Node Staging System in Evaluating Prognosis of Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8142-8151. [PMID: 34532819 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10749-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymph node (LN) involvement is a critical prognostic factor in patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Controversy exists regarding optimal categorization of nodal metastasis status, including anatomical location of positive nodes (AJCC 7th N staging), number of metastatic lymph nodes (NMLN), log odds of metastatic LNs (LODDS), and lymph node ratio (LNR). METHODS Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for GBC from six Chinese tertiary hospitals between 2008 and 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. The relative discriminative abilities of the different LN staging systems were assessed by different models including the tree-augmented naïve Bayesian (TAN) model, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and binary logistic regression model. RESULTS A total of 226 patients were involved in this cohort. Based on the TAN model and composite importance measures, the most important factor affecting the prognosis in the different LN staging systems was NMLN. Among the four TAN models which were built with 4 metastatic LN markers and baseline variables, the accuracy of the NMLN-based prognostic model was 88.15%, higher than 7th N staging (86.44%), LNR (87.34%), and LODDS (85.19%). The Cox model based on NMLN (C-index: 0.763, AIC: 1371.62) had a higher fitness than the others (7th N staging C-index: 0.756, AIC: 1375.51; LNR C-index: 0.759, AIC: 1378.82; LODDS C-index 0.748, AIC: 1390.99). The AUCs of different staging binary logistic regression models were NMLN (0.872), LNR (0.872), 7th N staging (0.869) and LODDS (0.856), respectively. CONCLUSIONS NMLN was the optimal LN staging system in evaluating prognosis of GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhang Rui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Wu Yuhan
- Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhang Yongjie
- Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiu Yinghe
- Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Ning
- Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Song Tianqiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Lou Jianying
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Li Jiangtao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Mao Xianhai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Li Shengping
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Si Shubin
- Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Cai Zhiqiang
- Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Tang Zhaohui
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Geng Zhimin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Srivastava V, Verma K, Puneet. Surgical Management of Gallbladder Carcinoma. Indian J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-019-02050-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
20
|
Prognostic Significance of Tumor Location in T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10153317. [PMID: 34362101 PMCID: PMC8348431 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10153317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition, subdivided T2 GBC into T2a and T2b. However, there still exist a lack of evidence on the prognostic significance of tumor location. The aim of the present study was to examine the existing evidence to determine the prognostic significance of tumor location of T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC) and to evaluate the optimal surgical extent according to tumor location. (2) Methods: We searched for relevant literature published in the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase before September 2020 using search terms related to gallbladder, cancer, and stage. Data were weighted and pooled using random-effects modeling. (3) Results: Seven studies were deemed eligible for inclusion, representing a cohort of 1789 cases of resected T2 GBC. The overall survival for T2b tumor was significantly worse than that for T2a tumor (HR, 2.141; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.140 to 4.023; I2 = 71.4%; Pchi2 = 0.007). The rate of lymph node metastasis was lower in the T2a group (26.6%) than in the T2b group (36.6%) (OR, 2.164; 95% CI, 1.309 to 3.575). There was no evidence of a survival difference between the patients who underwent extended cholecystectomy and simple cholecystectomy in T2a GBC (OR, 0.802; 95% CI, 0.618 to 1.042) and T2b GBC (OR, 0.820; 95% CI, 0.620 to 1.083). (4) Conclusions: Hepatic side tumor was a significant poor prognostic factor in T2 GBC. Extended cholecystectomy and simple cholecystectomy showed comparable survival outcomes in T2 GBC, and additional large-scale prospective studies are warranted to establish evidence-based treatment guidelines for T2 GBC.
Collapse
|
21
|
Applicability of sentinel lymph node oriented treatment strategy for gallbladder cancer. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0247079. [PMID: 33577620 PMCID: PMC7880492 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Utility of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in some malignancies has been reported, however, research on that of gallbladder cancer (GBC) is rare. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the concept of SLN is applicable to T2/3 GBC. METHODS A total of 80 patients who underwent resection for gallbladder cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients with GBC were stratified into two groups based on the location of tumor, peritoneal-side (T2p or 3p) and hepatic-side (T2h or 3h) groups. We evaluated the relationship between cystic duct node (CDN) and downstream lymph node (LN) status. CDN was defined as a SLN in this study. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were classified into T2, including T2p (n = 18) and T2h (n = 20), and 42 patients into T3, including T3p (n = 22) andT3h (n = 20). The incidence of LN metastasis was significantly higher in hepatic-side than peritoneal-side in both T2 and T3 (P = 0.036 and 0.009, respectively). In T2, 14 T2p had negative CDN and downstream LN, however, three T2h had negative CDN and positive downstream LNs (defined as a skipped LN metastasis) (P = 0.043). In T3, patients with skipped LN metastasis were significantly higher in T3h (n = 11) than those in T3p (n = 2) (P<0.001). There was no recurrence of the local lymph node. Disease-free survival in the T2p and T3p were significantly better than those in the T2h and T3h (P = 0.005 and 0.025, respectively). CONCLUSION The concept of SLN can be applicable to T2p GBC, where the downstream LNs dissection can be omitted.
Collapse
|
22
|
Validation of the 8th Edition American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) Gallbladder Cancer Staging System: Prognostic Discrimination and Identification of Key Predictive Factors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13030547. [PMID: 33535552 PMCID: PMC7867111 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The scope of our study was to compare the predictive ability of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th and 8th edition in gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) patients, investigate the effect of AJCC 8th nodal status on the survival, and identify risk factors associated with the survival after N reclassification using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) in the period 2005-2015. The cohort consisted of 7743 patients diagnosed with GBC; 202 patients met the criteria for reclassification and were denoted as stage ≥III by AJCC 7th and 8th edition criteria. Overall survival concordance indices were similar for patients when classified by AJCC 8th (OS c-index: 0.665) versus AJCC 7th edition (OS c-index: 0.663). Relative mortality was higher within strata of T1, T2, and T3 patients with N2 compared with N1 stage (T1 HR: 2.258, p < 0.001; T2 HR: 1.607, p < 0.001; Τ3 HR: 1.306, p < 0.001). The risk of death was higher in T1-T3 patients with Nx compared with N1 stage (T1 HR: 1.281, p = 0.043, T2 HR: 2.221, p < 0.001, T3 HR: 2.194, p < 0.001). In patients with AJCC 8th edition stage ≥IIIB GBC and an available grade, univariate analysis showed that higher stage, Charlson-Deyo score ≥ 2, higher tumor grade, and unknown nodal status were associated with an increased risk of death, while year of diagnosis after 2013, academic center, chemotherapy. and radiation therapy were associated with decreased risk of death. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy were associated with decreased risk of death in patients with T3-T4 and T2-T4 GBC, respectively. In conclusion, the updated AJCC 8th GBC staging system was comparable to the 7th edition, with the recently implemented changes in N classification assessment failing to improve the prognostic performance of the staging system. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the T2 stage subclassification as well as to clarify the association, if any is actually present, between advanced N staging and increased risk of death in patients of the same T stage.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kingham TP, Aveson VG, Wei AC, Castellanos JA, Allen PJ, Nussbaum DP, Hu Y, D'Angelica MI. Surgical management of biliary malignancy. Curr Probl Surg 2021; 58:100854. [PMID: 33531120 PMCID: PMC8022290 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Victoria G Aveson
- New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornel Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Alice C Wei
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Peter J Allen
- Duke Cancer Center, Chief, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Yinin Hu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael I D'Angelica
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Professor of Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY..
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Naveed S, Qari H, Thau CM, Burasakarn P, Mir AW, Panday BB. Lymph Node Ratio is an Important Prognostic Factor in Curatively Resected Gallbladder Carcinoma, Especially in Node-positive Patients: An Experience from Endemic Region in a Developing Country. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2021; 11:1-5. [PMID: 34316456 PMCID: PMC8286361 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Metastasis to lymph nodes is a bad prognostic factor in patients with gallbladder carcinoma who undergo radical cholecystectomy. During the past decade, studies have brought focus on lymph node ratio (LNR) as an additional valuable prognostic factor in these cases.Our research studied the factors that predicted the recurrence of disease and survival of patients with gallbladder carcinoma who were treated with surgical resection, concentrating especially on the lymph nodal status as a prognostic factor and LNR in node-positive T1-T3 cases. Methods In our hospital, Mahavir Cancer Institute and Research Centre, we reviewed retrospective data, from 2009 to 2014, of 60 patients who had undergone radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder carcinoma. We staged the patients as per the AJCC eight edition. Predictive factors that affect disease-free survival (DFS), like age, gender, postoperative complications, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PVI), lymph node dissection, differentiation, T stage, N stage, number of lymph nodes involved, and LNR, were examined statistically. Results Lymph nodal involvement was found to be a principal predictive factor in cases in whom radical cholecystectomy was done. The number of lymph nodes dissected determined the prognosis in N0 cases. LNR was a strong prognostic factor for DFS in cases of curatively resected gallbladder cancer. Conclusion LNR is a strong predictive factor in radically resected gallbladder carcinoma cases. How to cite this article Naveed S, Qari H, Thau CM, et al. Lymph Node Ratio is an Important Prognostic Factor in Curatively Resected Gallbladder Carcinoma, Especially in Node-positive Patients: An Experience from Endemic Region in a Developing Country. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2021;11(1):1-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shah Naveed
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Upper GI and HPB Oncosurgery, SKIMS, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
| | - Hasina Qari
- Department of Health and Family Welfare, Jammu and Kashmir, India
| | - Cao M Thau
- HPB Division, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Womens Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pipit Burasakarn
- Department of Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Abdul W Mir
- Department of Surgical Oncology, SKIMS, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
| | - Brij Bhushan Panday
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mahavir Cancer Sansthan, Patna, Bihar, India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lopes Vendrami C, Magnetta MJ, Mittal PK, Moreno CC, Miller FH. Gallbladder Carcinoma and Its Differential Diagnosis at MRI: What Radiologists Should Know. Radiographics 2020; 41:78-95. [PMID: 33306452 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021200087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Gallbladder carcinoma is the most common cancer of the biliary system. It is challenging to diagnose because patients are often asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms that mimic common benign diseases. Surgical excision is the only curative therapy and is best accomplished at early non-locally advanced stages. Unfortunately, gallbladder cancer often manifests at late locally advanced stages, precluding cure. Early tumors are often incidentally detected at imaging or at cholecystectomy performed for another indication. Typical imaging features of localized disease include asymmetric gallbladder wall thickening, polyps larger than 1.0 cm, and a solid mass replacing the gallbladder lumen. Advanced tumors are often infiltrative and can be confusing at CT and MRI owing to their large size. Determination of the origin of the lesion is paramount to narrow the differential diagnosis but is often challenging. It is important to identify gallbladder cancer and distinguish it from other benign and malignant hepatobiliary processes. Since surgical resection is the only curative treatment option, radiologist understanding and interpretation of pathways of nodal and infiltrative tumor spread can direct surgery or preclude patients who may not benefit from surgery. While both CT and MRI are effective, MRI provides superior soft-tissue characterization of the gallbladder and biliary tree and is a useful imaging tool for diagnosis, staging, and evaluation of treatment response. ©RSNA, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camila Lopes Vendrami
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611 (C.L.V., M.J.M., F.H.M.); Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.C.M.)
| | - Michael J Magnetta
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611 (C.L.V., M.J.M., F.H.M.); Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.C.M.)
| | - Pardeep K Mittal
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611 (C.L.V., M.J.M., F.H.M.); Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.C.M.)
| | - Courtney C Moreno
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611 (C.L.V., M.J.M., F.H.M.); Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.C.M.)
| | - Frank H Miller
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611 (C.L.V., M.J.M., F.H.M.); Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.C.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Akhtar J, Priya R, Jain V, Sakhuja P, Agarwal AK, Goyal S, Polisetty RV, Sirdeshmukh R, Kar S, Gautam P. Immunoproteomics approach revealed elevated autoantibody levels against ANXA1 in early stage gallbladder carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:1175. [PMID: 33261560 PMCID: PMC7709428 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07676-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Early diagnosis is important for the timely treatment of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) patients and may lead to increased survival outcomes. Here, we have applied serological proteome analysis (SERPA), an immunoproteomics approach, for the detection of ‘tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) that elicit humoral response’ in early stage GBC patients. Methods Total protein from pooled tumor tissue of GBC patients (n = 7) was resolved by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) followed by immunoblotting using pooled blood plasma from healthy volunteers (n = 11) or gallstone disease (GSD) cases (n = 11) or early stage GBC (Stage I and II) (n = 5) or GBC stage IIIA (n = 9). 2-D gel and immunoblot images were acquired and analyzed using PDQuest software to identify immunoreactive spots in GBC cases in comparison to controls. Proteins from immunoreactive spots were identified by liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometric analysis (LC-MS/MS). Autoantibody levels for two of the functionally relevant proteins were investigated in individual plasma samples (52 cases and 89 controls) by dot blot assay using recombinant proteins. Results Image analysis using PDQuest software identified 25 protein spots with significantly high or specific immunoreactivity in GBC cases. Mass spectrometric analysis of 8 corresponding protein spots showing intense immunoreactivity (based on densitometric analysis) in early stage GBC or GBC stage IIIA cases led to the identification of 27 proteins. Some of the identified proteins include ANXA1, HSPD1, CA1, CA2, ALDOA and CTSD. Among the two proteins, namely ANXA1 and HSPD1 verified using a cohort of samples, significantly elevated autoantibody levels against ANXA1 were observed in early stage GBC cases in comparison to healthy volunteers or GSD cases (unpaired t-test, p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for ANXA1 showed an Area under the Curve (AUC) of 0.69, with 41.7% sensitivity against a specificity of 89.9% for early stage GBC. IHC analysis for ANXA1 protein showed ‘high’ expression levels in 72% of GBC cases whereas all the controls showed ‘low’ expression levels. Conclusions The study suggests that the ANXA1 autoantibody levels against ANXA1 may be potentially employed for early stage detection of GBC patients. Other proteins could also be explored and verified in a large cohort of clinical samples. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-020-07676-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javed Akhtar
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, ICMR- National Institute of Pathology, Safdarjung Hospital Campus, New Delhi, 110029, India.,Jamia Hamdard- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, 110062, India
| | - Ratna Priya
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, ICMR- National Institute of Pathology, Safdarjung Hospital Campus, New Delhi, 110029, India.,Jamia Hamdard- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, 110062, India
| | - Vaishali Jain
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, ICMR- National Institute of Pathology, Safdarjung Hospital Campus, New Delhi, 110029, India.,Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE) , 576104, Manipal, India
| | - Puja Sakhuja
- Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, 110002, India
| | - Anil Kumar Agarwal
- Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, 110002, India
| | - Surbhi Goyal
- Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, 110002, India
| | - Ravindra Varma Polisetty
- Department of Biochemistry, Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110021, India
| | - Ravi Sirdeshmukh
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE) , 576104, Manipal, India.,Institute of Bioinformatics, International Tech Park, Bangalore, 560066, India
| | - Sudeshna Kar
- Jamia Hamdard- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, 110062, India
| | - Poonam Gautam
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, ICMR- National Institute of Pathology, Safdarjung Hospital Campus, New Delhi, 110029, India.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Coimbra FJF, Torres OJM, Alikhanov R, Agarwal A, Pessaux P, Fernandes EDSM, Quireze-Junior C, Araujo RLC, Godoy AL, Waechter FL, Resende APD, Boff MF, Coelho GR, Rezende MBD, Linhares MM, Belotto M, Moraes-Junior JMA, Amaral PCG, Pinto RD, Genzini T, Lima AS, Ribeiro HSC, Ramos EJ, Anghinoni M, Pereira LL, Enne M, Sampaio A, Montagnini AL, Diniz A, Jesus VHFD, Sirohi B, Shrikhande SV, Peixoto RDA, Kalil AN, Jarufe N, Smith M, Herman P. BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS ON INCIDENTAL GALLBLADDER CARCINOMA. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 33:e1496. [PMID: 32667526 PMCID: PMC7357549 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background: Incidental gallbladder cancer is defined as a cancer discovered by
histological examination after cholecystectomy. It is a potentially curable
disease. However, some questions related to their management remain
controversial and a defined strategy is associated with better prognosis.
Aim: To develop the first evidence-based consensus for management of patients with
incidental gallbladder cancer in Brazil. Methods: Sixteen questions were selected, and 36 Brazilian and International members
were included to the answer them. The statements were based on current
evident literature. The final report was sent to the members of the panel
for agreement assessment. Results: Intraoperative evaluation of the specimen, use of retrieval bags and routine
histopathology is recommended. Complete preoperative evaluation is necessary
and the reoperation should be performed once final staging is available.
Evaluation of the cystic duct margin and routine 16b1 lymph node biopsy is
recommended. Chemotherapy should be considered and chemoradiation therapy if
microscopically positive surgical margins. Port site should be resected
exceptionally. Staging laparoscopy before reoperation is recommended, but
minimally invasive radical approach only in specialized minimally invasive
hepatopancreatobiliary centers. The extent of liver resection is acceptable
if R0 resection is achieved. Standard lymph node dissection is required for
T2 tumors and above, but common bile duct resection is not recommended
routinely. Conclusions: It was possible to prepare safe recommendations as guidance for incidental
gallbladder carcinoma, addressing the most frequent topics of everyday work
of digestive and general surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Orlando Jorge M Torres
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, Brazil
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anil Agarwal
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Nouvel Hopital Civil, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Eduardo de Souza M Fernandes
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - André Luis Godoy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabio Luis Waechter
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | | | - Gustavo Rego Coelho
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Hospital Walter Cantidio, Fortaleza, Brazil
| | | | | | - Marcos Belotto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Rinaldo Danesi Pinto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Santa Catarina, Blumenal, Brazil
| | - Tercio Genzini
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Hospital Beneficiência Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Agnaldo Soares Lima
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | - Eduardo José Ramos
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Hospital NS das Graças, Curitiba, Brazil
| | | | - Lucio Lucas Pereira
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasilia, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Enne
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Ipanema Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Adriano Sampaio
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Santo Amaro University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - André Luis Montagnini
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alessandro Diniz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Bhawna Sirohi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Oncology Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Oncology Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Antonio Nocchi Kalil
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Nicolas Jarufe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Universidade Católica, Santiago, Chile
| | - Martin Smith
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Paulo Herman
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhang R, Wu YH, Cai ZQ, Xue F, Zhang D, Chen C, Li Q, Fu JL, Tang ZH, Si SB, Geng ZM. Optimal number of harvested lymph nodes for curatively resected gallbladder adenocarcinoma based on a Bayesian network model. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:1409-1417. [PMID: 32820544 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To identify the optimal range and the minimum number of lymph nodes (LNs) to be examined to maximize survival time of patients with curatively resected gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC). METHODS Data were collected from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database on patients with GBAC who underwent curative resection between 2004 and 2015. A Bayesian network (BN) model was constructed to identify the optimal range of harvested LNs. Model accuracy was evaluated using the confusion matrix and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS A total of 1268 patients were enrolled in this study. Accuracy of the BN model was 72.82%, and the area under the curve of the ROC for the testing dataset was 78.49%. We found that at least seven LNs should be harvested to maximize survival time, and that the optimal count of harvested LNs was in the range of 7 to 10 overall, with an optimal range of 10 to 11 for N+ patients, 7 to 10 for stage T1-T2 patients, and 7 to 11 for stage T3-T4 patients. CONCLUSIONS According to a BN model, at least seven LNs should be retrieved for GBAC with curative resection, with an overall optimal range of 7 to 10 harvested LNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Yu-Han Wu
- Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhi-Qiang Cai
- Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Feng Xue
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Dong Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Chen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Qi Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jia-Lu Fu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhao-Hui Tang
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shu-Bin Si
- Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhi-Min Geng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Raj G, Singh B, Raj R, Singh R. Lymph Nodal Metastatic Pattern in Carcinoma Gallbladder with Multidetector Computed Tomography: An Institutional Experience. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective This work aimed to study the distribution of lymph nodal metastatic pattern in carcinoma gallbladder with multidetector computed tomography (CT).
Materials and Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted including 80 patients with carcinoma gallbladder who underwent triple-phase CT angiography or single-phase contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen between January 2019 and November 2019.
Results In our study, 75 (93.7%) out of 80 cases showed metastasis to lymph nodes, with distribution as follows: periportal (69), peripancreatic (62), and aortocaval (47). The most common involved combination included all three lymph nodal groups (periportal, peripancreatic, and aortocaval), involving 40 (50%) cases. The combination of only periportal and peripancreatic lymph nodes was seen in 17 (21%) cases. Isolated periportal lymph nodes were seen in eight cases (10%) cases. The combination of only periportal and aortocaval lymph nodes was seen in four (5%) cases. Isolated peripancreatic lymph nodes were seen in three (3.7%) cases. The combination of periportal and aortocaval was seen in four (5%) cases followed by peripancreatic and aortocaval lymph nodes that was seen in two (2.5%) cases. Isolated aortocaval lymph nodes were seen in one (1.2%) case.
Conclusion Periportal lymph nodes were the single most commonly involved station followed by peripancreatic and aortocaval lymph nodes. The combination of periportal, peripancreatic, and aortocaval lymph nodes was seen most commonly. The second most commonly involved combination was found to be periportal and peripancreatic lymph nodes followed by isolated periportal lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav Raj
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Bhanupriya Singh
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Richa Raj
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ragini Singh
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sheka AC, Altman A, Marmor S, Hui JYC, Denbo JW, Ankeny JS, Jensen EH. Failure to administer multimodality therapy leads to sub-optimal outcomes for patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers in the United States. Surg Oncol 2020; 34:298-303. [PMID: 32891346 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymph node-positive biliary tract cancers have poor overall survival. Surgical resection followed by systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. We sought to assess the delivery of multimodality therapy in the United States. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database was used to identify patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers without distant metastases from 2000 to 2014. Patients were stratified by disease subtype (gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic, extrahepatic, or hilar cholangiocarcinoma) and treatment received (surgery alone, chemotherapy alone, or surgery + chemotherapy). Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS A total of 3226 patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers were identified. Of 2837 patients who underwent surgical resection, 1386 (49%) received no systemic chemotherapy following surgery, while 1451 (51%) received surgery + chemotherapy. A total of 389 patients (12%) received chemotherapy alone. Median overall survival was longer for patients who underwent surgery + chemotherapy (19 months, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in survival for those who received surgery alone versus chemotherapy alone (10 months for both, p = NS). Receipt of surgery + chemotherapy was independently associated with survival on Cox proportional hazard ratio modeling compared to surgery alone (HR for mortality 1.71, 95% CI 1.56-1.87, p < 0.0001) or chemotherapy alone (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.46-1.92, p < 0.0001). These trends were consistent across all disease subtypes. DISCUSSION Optimal survival for node-positive biliary tract cancers depends on multimodality therapy. Following surgery, a substantial proportion of patients do not receive guideline recommended adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam C Sheka
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ariella Altman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Schelomo Marmor
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jane Y C Hui
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jason W Denbo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jacob S Ankeny
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Eric H Jensen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Xu L, Tan H, Liu X, Huang J, Liu L, Si S, Sun Y, Zhou W, Yang Z. Survival benefits of simple versus extended cholecystectomy and lymphadenectomy for patients with T1b gallbladder cancer: An analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database (2004 to 2013). Cancer Med 2020; 9:3668-3679. [PMID: 32233076 PMCID: PMC7286443 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Although guidelines recommend extended surgical resection, radical resection and lymphadenectomy for patients with tumor stage (T)1b gallbladder cancer, these procedures are substantially underutilized. This population‐based, retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes of 401 patients using the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2013. Results showed that median overall survival (OS) was 69 months for lymphadenectomy patients and 37 months for those without lymphadenectomy. Lymphadenectomy also tended to prolong cancer‐specific survival (CSS), although the differences were not statistically significant. OS and CSS were similar for patients who received simple cholecystectomy and extended surgical resection. Cox proportional hazards regression models revealed survival advantages in patients with stage T1bN0 gallbladder cancer compared to those with stage T1bN1, and patients who received simple cholecystectomy plus lymphadenectomy compared to those who did not receive lymph node dissection. In further analyses, patients undergoing simple cholecystectomy who had five or more lymph nodes excised had better OS and CSS than those without lymph node dissection. In conclusion, survival advantages are shown for patients with T1b gallbladder cancer undergoing surgeries with lymphadenectomy. Future studies with longer follow‐up and control of potential confounders are highly warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Haidong Tan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaolei Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jia Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Liguo Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shuang Si
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yongliang Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wenying Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiying Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Excision in T1 and T2 Gallbladder Cancer: a Population-Based and Propensity Score-Matched SEER Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:633-642. [PMID: 30887297 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04175-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to assess the effect of lymphadenectomy on survival in T1/T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC). METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing surgery for T1/T2 GBC from 2004 to 2014 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The effect of lymph node excision (LNE) on survival was assessed using Cox regression and propensity score methods. RESULTS A total of 2112 patients were identified: 11.4% had T1a, 18.5% T1b, and 70.1% had T2 tumors. Mean follow-up was 31.3 months. In 48.8% of patients, LNE was performed with a mean of 3.6 ± 4.3 nodes retrieved. Cancer-specific 5-year survival for T1 and T2 stages combined was 49.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 45.9-53.6%) without LNE compared to 56.2% (95% CI, 52.4-60.4%) if LNE was performed (hazard ratio (HR), 0.75; 95%CI, 0.64-0.86, P < 0.001). Propensity score analyses for both stages combined confirmed this survival benefit with an HR of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55-0.80) for the LNE group (P < 0.001). Stratified for tumor stages, LNE had no significant effect on cancer-specific survival in T1a (HR, 1.80 (95% CI, 0.76-4.26), P = 0.185) or T1b tumors (HR, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.57-1.58), P = 0.844), whereas it persistently revealed an advantage for patients with T2 tumors (HR 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55-0.83, P < 0.001). No correlation between the number of retrieved lymph nodes and the N+ rate was found (P = 0.134). CONCLUSIONS LNE is associated with improved survival in T2 GBC. No significant survival benefit was observed in T1a and T1b tumors. The retrieval of even a few lymph nodes reliably predicts the nodal status, which might assist in patient selection for re-resection in T1 GBC.
Collapse
|
33
|
Xiao Z, Shi Z, Hu L, Gao Y, Zhao J, Liu Y, Xu Q, Huang D. A new nomogram from the SEER database for predicting the prognosis of gallbladder cancer patients after surgery. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:738. [PMID: 32042754 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background To study the prognostic significance in gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients of the four N stage methods of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), lymph node ratio (LNR), and N stage in the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), and to establish a prognostic model of GBC based on LODDS. Methods Data of 1,321 patients with GBC who underwent surgical resection of lymph nodes from 2010 to 2014 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We then randomly divided these data into a training set (n=925) and a validation set (n=396). C-index, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the accuracy of LODDS, LNR, and N stage in the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC. Cox multivariate analysis was performed to determine whether LODDS was an independent prognostic factor, and a nomogram model was established. C-index was used to evaluate the accuracy of the nomogram. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn and the area under the AUC was calculated to evaluate the accuracy of the nomogram in predicting patients' 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS). Results Univariate analysis showed that the four methods were all correlated with OS. Through C-index, AIC and AUC, We found that LODDS had the best accuracy of the four methods. C-index and AUC analysis revealed that the nomogram based on LODDS had excellent prognostic ability. All the results were verified in the validation set. Conclusions LODDS is an independent prognostic factor for GBC patients, and it is the best N stage in the SEER database. This new nomogram-containing LODDS system is a great model to predict the prognosis of GBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zunqiang Xiao
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310014, China
| | - Zhan Shi
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310014, China
| | - Linjun Hu
- The Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
| | - Yuling Gao
- Department of Genetic Laboratory, Shaoxing Women and Children Hospital, Shaoxing 312030, China
| | - Junjun Zhao
- Graduate Department, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233030, China
| | - Yang Liu
- The Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
| | - Qiuran Xu
- The Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou 310014, China
| | - Dongsheng Huang
- The Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou 310014, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Leigh NL, Solomon D, Feingold D, Hiotis SP, Labow DM, Magge DR, Sarpel U, Golas BJ. Staging gallbladder cancer with lymphadenectomy: the practical application of new AHPBA and AJCC guidelines. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1563-1569. [PMID: 31010632 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend harvesting a total lymph node count (TLNC) ≥6 from portal lymphadenectomy in ≥pT1b gallbladder cancers (GBC) for accurate staging and prognostication. This study aimed to determine nodal yields from portal lymphadenectomy and identify measures to maximize TLNC. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all ≥pT1b GBC which underwent resection with curative intent including portal lymphadenectomy at our specialized HPB center from 2007 to 2017. We compared outcomes of TLNC < 6 and TLNC ≥ 6 cohorts and determined factors predictive of TLNC. RESULTS Of 92 patients, 20% had a TLNC ≥ 6 (IQR 7-11) and 9% had no nodes found on pathology. Malignant lymphadenopathy was twice as common in TLNC ≥ 6 as TLNC < 6 (p = 0.003) most frequently from portal, cystic and pericholedochal stations. On logistic regression analysis, concomitant liver resection was an independent predictor of higher TLNC [4b/5 wedge resection (OR 0.166, CI 0.057-0.486, p = 0.001) extended hepatectomy (OR 0.065, CI 0.012-0.340, p = 0.001)]; biliary resection and en bloc adjacent organ resection were not. CONCLUSION At our center, prior to current guidelines, a TLNC≥6 was not met in 80% undergoing portal lymphadenectomy for ≥ pT1b GBC. To increase nodal yield, future guidelines should consider including additional lymph node stations and incorporation of frozen section analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha L Leigh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, 425 West 59th Street, Suite 7B, New York, NY 10019, United States; Mount Sinai Hospital Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 19 East 98th Street, Suite 7A, New York, NY 10029, United States.
| | - Daniel Solomon
- Mount Sinai Hospital Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 19 East 98th Street, Suite 7A, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Daniela Feingold
- Mount Sinai Hospital Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 19 East 98th Street, Suite 7A, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Spiros P Hiotis
- Mount Sinai Hospital Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 19 East 98th Street, Suite 7A, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Daniel M Labow
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, 425 West 59th Street, Suite 7B, New York, NY 10019, United States; Mount Sinai Hospital Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 19 East 98th Street, Suite 7A, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Deepa R Magge
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, 425 West 59th Street, Suite 7B, New York, NY 10019, United States; Mount Sinai Hospital Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 19 East 98th Street, Suite 7A, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Umut Sarpel
- Mount Sinai Hospital Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 19 East 98th Street, Suite 7A, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Benjamin J Golas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, 425 West 59th Street, Suite 7B, New York, NY 10019, United States; Mount Sinai Hospital Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 19 East 98th Street, Suite 7A, New York, NY 10029, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Who benefits from R0 resection? A single-center analysis of patients with stage Ⅳ gallbladder cancer. Chronic Dis Transl Med 2019; 5:188-196. [PMID: 31891130 PMCID: PMC6926113 DOI: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2019.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Most patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) present with advanced-stage disease and have a poor prognosis. Radical resection remains the only therapeutic option to improve survival in patients with GBC. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic factors in patients with stage Ⅳ GBC and to identify a subgroup of patients who might benefit from R0 resection. Methods A total of 285 patients with stage Ⅳ GBC were retrospectively analyzed at our institution from January 2008 to December 2012. Factors potentially influencing the prognosis of GBC after surgery were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 6.6% (15/229), 0.9% (2/229), and 0 (0/229), respectively. Ascites (relative risk [RR] = 1.631, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.221-2.180, P = 0.001), pathological grade (RR = 1.337, 95% CI: 1.050-1.702, P = 0.018), T stage (RR = 1.421, 95% CI: 1.099-1.837, P = 0.000), M stage (RR = 1.896, 95% CI: 1.409-2.552, P = 0.000), and surgery (RR = 1.542, 95% CI: 1.022-2.327, P = 0.039) were identified as independent risk factors influencing prognosis. The median survival time (MST) was significantly higher in patients undergoing R0 resection than in those undergoing R1/R2 resection (6.0 vs. 2.7 months; P < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, stage ⅣA patients benefited from R0 resection (MST for R0 vs. R1/R2, 11.0 vs. 4.0 months; P = 0.003), while R0 resection had a significant survival benefit than R1/R2 resection in patient with stage ⅣB GBC without distant metastasis (MST for R0 vs. R1/R2, 6.0 vs. 3.0 months; P = 0.007). Conclusion Ascites, pathological grade, T stage, M stage, and surgery were independent risk factors influencing prognosis in patients with stage IV GBC. N2 lymph node metastasis did not preclude curative resection, and radical resection should be considered in patients with stage Ⅳ GBC without distant metastasis once R0 margin was achieved.
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gallbladder polyps (GBPs) are generally harmless, but the planning of diagnosis and treatment of the GBP is of clinical importance due to the high mortality risk of delays in the diagnosis of gallbladder carcinomas that show polypoid development. MATERIALS AND METHODS GBPs are usually incidentally detected during ultrasonographic (USG) examinations of the abdomen. The risk of carcinoma development from polypoid lesions in the literature is reported as 0-27%. There is no consensus about the management of the GBPs. Herein, we reviewed the contemporary data to update our knowledge about diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder polyps. RESULTS Polyps can be identified in five different groups, primarily as neoplastic and non-neoplastic. Cholesterol polyps account for 60% of all cases. The most common (25%) benign polypoid lesions after cholesterol polyps are adenomyomas. CONCLUSION Ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasonography seems to be the most important tool in differential diagnosis and treatment. Ultrasonography should be repeated in every 3-12 months in cases that are thought to be risky. Nowadays, the most common treatment approach is to perform cholecystectomy in patients with polyps larger than 10 mm in diameter. Radical cholecystectomy and/or segmental liver resections should be planned in cases of malignancy. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE Dilek ON, Karsu S, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Gallbladder Polyps: Current Perspectives. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2019;9(1):40-48.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Nuri Dilek
- Department of Surgery, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Sebnem Karasu
- Department of Radiology, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Fatma Hüsniye Dilek
- Department of Pathology, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Oweira H, Mehrabi A, Giryes A, Tekbas A, Abdel-Rahman O. External validation of the 8 th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gall bladder carcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:1084-1090. [PMID: 30603127 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.08.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To validate the changes within the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging system for gall bladder carcinoma compared to AJCC 7th staging system. Methods Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database [2004-2014] was queried. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Log-rank testing were assessed according to both AJCC 7th and 8th staging systems. Likewise, Cox cancer-specific hazard ratio was evaluated according to both staging systems. Results Overall survival was assessed according to the two staging systems; and P values for overall trend (log/rank test) were significant (P<0.001) for both scenarios. Cox regression cancer-specific hazard adjusted for age, gender, histology, gender and surgery was evaluated according to the two staging systems. According to AJCC 7th staging system, the following pair wise hazard ratio comparisons were significant (II vs. IIIA; IIIB vs. IVA; IVA vs. IVB). According to AJCC 8th staging system, the following pair wise hazard ratio comparisons were significant (II vs. IIIA; IVA vs. IVB). C-statistic was assessed using death from gall bladder carcinoma as the dependent variable; and the findings for the two staging systems were as follows: AJCC 7th staging system: 0.684 (SE: 0.008; 95% CI: 0.667-0.701); AJCC 8th staging system: 0.682 (SE: 0.009; 95% CI: 0.665-0.698). Conclusions There is a comparable discriminatory performance for AJCC 8th staging system compared to AJCC 7th staging system. Change form location-based to number-based N category assessment does not improve the overall prognostic performance of the staging system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hani Oweira
- Oncology Department, Swiss Cancer Institute, Cham, Switzerland.,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anwar Giryes
- Oncology Department, Swiss Cancer Institute, Cham, Switzerland
| | - Aysun Tekbas
- Surgery Department, University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Omar Abdel-Rahman
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.,Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI for the detection of lymph node metastases in gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2018; 110:156-162. [PMID: 30599854 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 11/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymph node metastases (LNM) are an ominous prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer (GBC) and, when present, should preclude surgery. However, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal imaging modality for pre-operative detection of LNM and international guidelines vary in their recommendations. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of LNM of GBC. METHODS A literature search of studies published until November 2017 concerning the diagnostic accuracy of CT or MRI regarding the detection of LNM in GBC was performed. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed independently by two reviewers. The sensitivity of CT and MRI in the detection of LNM was reviewed. Additionally, estimated summary sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of MRI were calculated in a patient based meta-analysis. RESULTS Nine studies including 292 patients were included for narrative synthesis and 5 studies including 158 patients were selected for meta-analysis. Sensitivity of CT ranged from 0.25 to 0.93. Estimated summary diagnostic accuracy parameters of MRI were as follows: sensitivity 0.75 (95% CI 0.6 - 0.85), specificity 0.83 (95% CI 0.74 - 0.90), LR + 4.52 (95% CI 2.55-6.48) and LR- 0.3 (95% CI 0.15 - 0.45). Small (<10 mm) LNM were most frequently undetected on pre-operative imaging. Due to a lack of data, no subgroup analysis comparing the diagnostic accuracy of CT versus MRI could be performed. CONCLUSION The value of current imaging strategies for the pre-operative assessment of nodal status in GBC remains unclear, especially regarding the detection of small LNM. Additional research is warranted in order to establish uniformity in international guidelines, improve pre-operative nodal staging and to prevent futile surgery.
Collapse
|
40
|
Castro CM, Santibañez SP, Rivas TC, Cassis NJ. Totally Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Gallbladder Cancer: Technical Aspects and Long-Term Results. World J Surg 2018. [PMID: 29520484 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4490-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare tumor in developed countries. Chile has one of the highest incidences worldwide. For patients affected by resectable T1b or more advanced GBC, radical cholecystectomy (RC) is considered the standard therapy. Our aim is to describe the surgical technique and clinical-pathological results of patients undergoing totally laparoscopic radical resection of GBC. METHODS Patients undergo laparoscopic radical resection for primary and incidental GBC, between the years 2009 and 2016 in two centers from Chile. Patients in whom suspected bile duct invasion, frozen biopsy did not confirm cancer and para-aortic lymph node sampling was positive were excluded. RESULTS Eighteen patients were operated, 77.8% were female with median age of 60.5 year, and 16 patients had previous cholecystectomy with incidental cancer finding. The median operative time was 490 min (400-550). No conversion to open surgery occurred. All patients achieved a R0 resection. Postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients (11.1%), and there was not mortality. After a median follow-up of 59 months, the 5-year survival was 80.7%. CONCLUSION This study shows the technical feasibility of the totally laparoscopic approach for radical resection of GBC with the same principles of classical open surgery. It appears that long-term oncological findings would also be similar at least in less advanced lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- César Muñoz Castro
- Digestive Surgery, Hospital Regional de Talca, 1 North #1951, Talca, Chile. .,Medicine School, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile.
| | | | - Tomás Contreras Rivas
- Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinico, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Nicolás Jarufe Cassis
- Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinico, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Laparoscopic Hilar Lymph Node Sampling in Patients With Biliary Tract Cancers That are Rarely Associated With Nodal Metastasis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2018; 28:90-95. [PMID: 29369964 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Among the various types of biliary tract cancer, patients with single, small (<5 cm), peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), or small (<2 cm) gallbladder tumors (GBTs) rarely develop lymph node (LN) metastasis. We investigated a laparoscopic approach for hilar LN sampling in such cases. METHODS Among the 176 patients with biliary tract cancer who were treated from January 2012 to March 2017, 21 (ICC, n=4; GBT, n=17) met the above indications. RESULTS All patients were treated by a laparoscopic approach with R0 resection. After determining the pathologic diagnosis, 9 patients with GBT and all 4 patients with ICC underwent laparoscopic LN sampling; the mean numbers of sampled LNs were 2.6 and 7.3, respectively; no patients had metastasis. The mean operating times for GBT and ICC were 223 and 379 minutes, respectively; the mean blood loss was 23 mL and 171 mL. With the exception of 1 patient who developed intrahepatic metastasis of ICC at the opposite liver lobe, all of the patients were recurrence free. CONCLUSIONS A laparoscopic approach could be safely applied under our indications.
Collapse
|
42
|
Lee AJ, Chiang YJ, Lee JE, Conrad C, Chun YS, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Tzeng CWD. Validation of American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth staging system for gallbladder cancer and its lymphadenectomy guidelines. J Surg Res 2018; 230:148-154. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 12/31/2017] [Revised: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
43
|
Yifan T, Zheyong L, Miaoqin C, Liang S, Xiujun C. A predictive model for survival of gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:365-372. [PMID: 30217289 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Revised: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a life-threatening disease with a poor prognosis worldwide. Although several risk factors for survival have been identified, an ideal model for predicting prognosis has still not been developed due to the low incidence of GBC. This study aims to solve this dilemma by attempting to develop an efficient survival prediction model for GBC. METHODS This is a retrospective study. From January 2009 to June 2016, 164 patients with a confirmed histological diagnosis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this study. The cohort was randomly divided into two cohorts, the development cohort (n = 110) and validation cohort (n = 54). On the basis of the risk factors identified in the development cohort, a nomogram-based predictive model (P-risk Plus), composed of carbohydrate antigen 199 and pathological characteristics, was established for prognosis. RESULTS In this model, the calibration curves for the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival probabilities were well-matched with the actual survival rates. In addition, the highest C-index and best decision curve analysis were able to be obviously determined. Meanwhile, the P-risk Plus model result yielded a better fit for survival between the development and validation groups. CONCLUSION Compared with conventional tumor stages, our nomogram-based P-risk Plus model for gallbladder adenocarcinoma has a better predictive capacity and thereby has a better potential to facilitate decision-making clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tong Yifan
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Li Zheyong
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chen Miaoqin
- Department of Biological Treatment Research Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shi Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Cai Xiujun
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pandey D, Garg PK, Jakhetiya A, Jain N, Rai S. Surgico-pathological Outcomes of 148 Radical Cholecystectomies Using Systematic Regional Lymphadenectomy Protocol: a Retrospective Study. J Gastrointest Cancer 2018; 49:221-224. [PMID: 29691709 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-018-0106-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Durgatosh Pandey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Artemis Hospitals, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Pankaj Kumar Garg
- Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, 110095, India.
| | - Ashish Jakhetiya
- Department of Cancer Surgery, Vardhaman Mahaveer Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Neelesh Jain
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Artemis Hospitals, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Shreyash Rai
- Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, 110095, India
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lee H, Kwon W, Han Y, Kim JR, Kim SW, Jang JY. Optimal extent of surgery for early gallbladder cancer with regard to long-term survival: a meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2017; 25:131-141. [DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hongeun Lee
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul National University College of Medicine; 101 Daehak-ro Chongno-gu, Seoul 03080 Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul National University College of Medicine; 101 Daehak-ro Chongno-gu, Seoul 03080 Korea
| | - Youngmin Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul National University College of Medicine; 101 Daehak-ro Chongno-gu, Seoul 03080 Korea
| | - Jae Ri Kim
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul National University College of Medicine; 101 Daehak-ro Chongno-gu, Seoul 03080 Korea
| | - Sun-Whe Kim
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul National University College of Medicine; 101 Daehak-ro Chongno-gu, Seoul 03080 Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul National University College of Medicine; 101 Daehak-ro Chongno-gu, Seoul 03080 Korea
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Patkar S, Ostwal V, Ramaswamy A, Engineer R, Chopra S, Shetty N, Dusane R, Shrikhande SV, Goel M. Emerging role of multimodality treatment in gall bladder cancer: Outcomes following 510 consecutive resections in a tertiary referral center. J Surg Oncol 2017; 117:372-379. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.24837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shraddha Patkar
- GI and HPB Service, Department of Surgical Oncology; Tata Memorial Hospital; Mumbai India
| | - Vikas Ostwal
- Department of Medical Oncology; Tata Memorial Hospital; Mumbai India
| | - Anant Ramaswamy
- Department of Medical Oncology; Tata Memorial Hospital; Mumbai India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Tata Memorial Hospital; Mumbai India
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Tata Memorial Hospital; Mumbai India
| | - Nitin Shetty
- Department of Interventional Radiology; Tata Memorial Hospital; Mumbai India
| | - Rohit Dusane
- Department of Biostatistics; Tata Memorial Hospital; Mumbai India
| | - Shailesh V. Shrikhande
- GI and HPB Service, Department of Surgical Oncology; Tata Memorial Hospital; Mumbai India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- GI and HPB Service, Department of Surgical Oncology; Tata Memorial Hospital; Mumbai India
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chen C, Wang L, Cong LL, Liu DC, Geng ZM. Lymphatic metastasis of gallbladder cancer: Present and future. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2016; 24:4634-4643. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v24.i35.4634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Lymphatic metastasis is the most common way of metastasis in gallbladder cancer (GBC), and it is also one of the important factors influencing prognosis. Therefore, it is important to elucidate the lymphatic drainage pathways, group the metastatic lymph nodes, assess the extent of lymphadenectomy, and identify relevant predictors of lymphatic metastasis. The development of lymph node tracer technique has greatly improved the surgical procedure, and exploration of the molecular mechanisms of lymphatic metastases may provide new therapeutic targets. In the current review, we discuss the lymphatic drainage pathways as well as the substation, predictors, tracers and mechanisms of lymphatic metastasis of GBC.
Collapse
|
48
|
Amini N, Kim Y, Wilson A, Margonis GA, Ethun CG, Poultsides G, Tran T, Idrees K, Isom CA, Fields RC, Krasnick B, Weber SM, Salem A, Martin RCG, Scoggins C, Shen P, Mogal HD, Schmidt C, Beal E, Hatzaras I, Shenoy R, Maithel SK, Pawlik TM. Prognostic Implications of Lymph Node Status for Patients With Gallbladder Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:3016-23. [PMID: 27150440 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5243-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 11/17/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification is the most accepted lymph node (LN) staging system for gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBA), other LN prognostic schemes have been proposed. This study sought to define the performance of the AJCC LN staging system relative to the number of metastatic LNs (NMLN), the log odds of metastatic LN (LODDS), and the LN ratio (LNR). METHODS Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for GBA between 2000 and 2015 were identified from a multi-institutional database. The prognostic performance of various LN staging systems was compared by Harrell's C and the Akaike information criterion (AIC). RESULTS Altogether, 214 patients with a median age of 66.7 years (interquartile range [IQR] 56.5-73.1) were identified. A total of 1334 LNs were retrieved, with a median of 4 (IQR 2-8) LNs per patient. Patients with LN metastasis had an increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.82; P = 0.003) and recurrence (HR 2.28; 95 % CI 1.37-3.80; P = 0.002). In the entire cohort, LNR, analyzed as either a continuous scale (C-index, 0.603; AIC, 803.5) or a discrete scale (C-index, 0.609; AIC, 802.2), provided better prognostic discrimination. Among the patients with four or more LNs examined, LODDS (C-index, 0.621; AIC, 363.8) had the best performance versus LNR (C-index, 0.615; AIC, 368.7), AJCC LN staging system (C-index, 0.601; AIC, 373.4), and NMLN (C-index, 0.613; AIC, 369.5). CONCLUSIONS Both LODDS and LNR performed better than the AJCC LN staging system. Among the patients who had four or more LNs examined, LODDS performed better than LNR. Both LODDS and LNR should be incorporated into the AJCC LN staging system for GBA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neda Amini
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yuhree Kim
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ana Wilson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Cecilia G Ethun
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - George Poultsides
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Thuy Tran
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kamran Idrees
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Chelsea A Isom
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Bradley Krasnick
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sharon M Weber
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ahmed Salem
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert C G Martin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Charles Scoggins
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Perry Shen
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Harveshp D Mogal
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Carl Schmidt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Eliza Beal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Rivfka Shenoy
- Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kim BH, Kim K, Chie EK, Kwon J, Jang JY, Kim SW, Han SW, Oh DY, Im SA, Kim TY, Bang YJ, Ha SW. The Prognostic Importance of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for Patients Undergoing Curative Resection Followed by Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19:1833-41. [PMID: 26239516 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2898-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 05/11/2015] [Accepted: 07/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current nodal staging system for extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer is controversial. The number of metastatic lymph nodes (mLN) and lymph node ratio (LNR) has been studied for the assessment of the nodal status in many other gastrointestinal cancers, but there are few studies on assessing the prognostic impact of these parameters in EHBD cancer. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 239 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of EHBD from 1995 to 2009 in our institution. The prognostic value of the number of mLN and LNR was evaluated by adjusting for other known factors. Optimal cutoff points were determined using maximally selected chi-square test. RESULTS Lymph node metastasis was found in 77 (32 %) patients. Univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) revealed both the number of mLN (0 vs. 1-3 vs. ≥4; p < 0.001) and LNR (<0.2 vs. ≥0.2; p < 0.001) as significant prognosticators. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the number of mLN was an independent prognostic factor, whereas LNR was not. The estimated 5-year OS was 48.7 % for patients with negative nodes, 33.4 % for patients with 1-3 mLN, and 9.1 % for patients with 4 or more mLN (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The number of mLN is a powerful parameter to predict survival in the EHBD cancer, which is more reliable than LNR. As for many other gastrointestinal cancers, further classification of node positive patients based on the number of mLN seems to be useful and may provide precise information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byoung Hyuck Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeanny Kwon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Whe Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Sae-Won Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Do-Youn Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae-You Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Yung-Jue Bang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung W Ha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Palanisamy S, Patel N, Sabnis S, Palanisamy N, Vijay A, Palanivelu P, Parthasarthi R, Chinnusamy P. Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy for suspected early gall bladder carcinoma: thinking beyond convention. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:2442-8. [PMID: 26416372 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4495-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 08/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gall bladder cancer (GBC) is the most common and aggressive malignancy of the biliary tract with extremely poor prognosis. Radical resection remains the only potential curative treatment for operable lesions. Although laparoscopic approach is now considered as standard of care for many gastrointestinal malignancies, surgical community is still reluctant to use this approach for GBC probably because of fear of tumor dissemination, inadequate lymphadenectomy and overall nihilistic approach. Aim of this study was to share our initial experience of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy (LRC) for suspected early GBC. METHODS From 2008 to 2013, 91 patients were evaluated for suspected GBC, of which, 14 patients had early disease and underwent LRC. RESULTS Mean age of the cohort was 61.14 ± 4.20 years with male/female ratio of 1:1.33. Mean operating time was 212.9 ± 26.73 min with mean blood loss of 196.4 ± 63.44 ml. Mean hospital stay was 5.14 ± 0.86 days without any 30-day mortality. Bile leak occurred in two patients. Out of 14 patients, 12 had adenocarcinoma, one had xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and another had adenomyomatosis of gall bladder as final pathology. Resected margins were free in all (>1 cm). Median number of lymph nodes resected was 8 (4-14). Pathological stage of disease was pT2N0 in eight, pT2N1 in three and pT3N0 in one patient. Median follow-up was 51 (14-70) months with 5-year survival 68.75 %. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with lymphadenectomy can be a viable alternative for management of early GBC in terms of technical feasibility and oncological clearance along with offering the conventional advantages of minimal access approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senthilnathan Palanisamy
- Department of HPB Surgery, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mills Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India.
| | - Nikunj Patel
- Department of HPB Surgery, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mills Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India
| | - Sandeep Sabnis
- Department of HPB Surgery, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mills Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India
| | - Nalankilli Palanisamy
- Department of HPB Surgery, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mills Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India
| | - Anand Vijay
- Department of HPB Surgery, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mills Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India
| | - Praveenraj Palanivelu
- Department of HPB Surgery, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mills Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India
| | - R Parthasarthi
- Department of HPB Surgery, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mills Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India
| | - Palanivelu Chinnusamy
- Department of HPB Surgery, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mills Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India
| |
Collapse
|