Preliminary results of phase I trial of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT), leucovorin plus irinotecan and radiation therapy for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

A phase I study of oral UFT/leucovorin and irinotecan, plus radiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer

Objectives: The aim of this phase I study is to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of CPT-11 in combination with UFT/LV and radiation in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. Methods: Patients with histologically proven rectal cancer with local recurrence were eligible for this study. Escalating doses of CPT-11 (30-60 mg/m²) were administered on days 3, 10, 24, and 31. UFT (300 mg/m²) and LV (75 mg/body) were given on days 1-5, 8-12, 22-26, and 29-33. Radiotherapy doses consisted of 50 Gy in daily fractions of 2.0 Gy each, 5 times per week, for total 5 weeks. Results: We recruited 27 patients, and the MTD of CPT-11 was 60 mg/m² due to the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 diarrhea. Major grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (5/27; 18.5%) and diarrhea (6/27; 22.2%). No grade 4 adverse event was observed throughout this treatment. Conclusions: The combined chemoradiotherapy with oral UFT/LV plus CPT-11 is feasible and promising. The recommended dose for further phase II trials is determined to be 50 mg/m² of CPT-11.

UFT (tegafur-uracil) in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Major achievements in the treatment of localised rectal cancer include the development of total mesorectal excision and the perioperative administration of radiotherapy in combination with continuous infusion (CI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). This multimodal approach has resulted in extended survival and lower local relapse rates, with the potential for sphincter-preserving procedures. However, CI 5-FU is inconvenient for patients and is costly. Oral fluoropyrimidines like UFT (tegafur-uracil) offer a number of advantages over 5-FU.

METHODS

We undertook a review of published articles and abstracts relating to clinical studies of UFT in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Pre- and postoperative studies carried out in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent disease were included.

RESULTS

The combination of UFT and radiotherapy was effective and well tolerated in the preoperative setting, while adjuvant UFT improved survival and reduced distant relapse compared with surgery alone. The efficacy of UFT appears comparable with that of 5-FU and capecitabine and its side-effect profile is favourable.

CONCLUSION

Clinical experience to date suggests that UFT is a valuable treatment option for the perioperative treatment of LARC. Further improvements in patient outcomes may result from the combination of UFT with targeted agents.