Feasibility of single breath-hold left ventricular function with 3 Tesla TSENSE acquisition and 3D modeling analysis

Breath-hold and free-breathing quantitative assessment of biventricular volume and function using compressed SENSE: a clinical validation in children and young adults

BACKGROUND

Although the breath-hold cine balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) imaging is well established for assessment of biventricular volumes and function, shorter breath-hold times or no breath-holds are beneficial in children and severely ill or sedated patients.

METHODS

Clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations from September 2019 to October 2019 that included breath-hold (BH) and free-breathing (FB) cine bSSFP imaging accelerated using compressed sensitivity encoding (C-SENSE) factor of 3 in addition to the clinical standard BH cine bSSFP imaging using SENSE factor of 2 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with structurally normal hearts who could perform consistent BHs were included. Aortic flow measured by phase contrast acquisition was used as a reference for the left ventricular (LV) stroke volume. Comparative analysis was performed for evaluation of biventricular volumes and function, imaging times, quantitative image quality, and qualitative image scoring.

RESULTS

There were 26 patients who underwent all three cine scans during the study period (16.7 ± 6.4 years, body surface area (BSA) 1.6 ± 0.4 m2, heart rate 83 ± 7 beats/min). BH durations of 8 ± 1 s with C-SENSE = 3 were significantly shorter (p < 0.001) by 33% compared to 12 ± 1 s with SENSE = 2. Actual scan time for BH SENSE (4.9 ± 1.2 min) was comparable to that with FB C-SENSE (5.2 ± 1.5 min; p= NS). Biventricular stroke volume and ejection fraction, and LV mass computed using all three sequences were comparable. There was a small but statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference in LV end-diastolic volume (- 3.0 ± 6.8 ml) between BH SENSE and FB C-SENSE. There was a small but statistically significant (p < 0.005) difference in end-diastolic LV (- 5.0 ± 7.7 ml) and RV (- 6.0 ± 8.5 ml) volume and end-systolic LV (- 3.2 ± 4.3 ml) and RV(- 4.2 ± 6.8 ml) volumes between BH C-SENSE and FB C-SENSE. The LV stroke volumes from all three sequences had excellent correlations (r = 0.96, slope = 0.98-1.02) with aortic flow, with overestimation by 2.7 (5%) to 4.6 (8%) ml/beat. The image quality score was Excellent (16 of 26) to Good (10 of 26) with BH SENSE, Excellent (13 of 26) to Good (13 of 26) with BH C-SENSE, and Excellent (3 of 26) to Good (21 of 26) to Adequate (2 of 26) with FB C-SENSE.

CONCLUSIONS

Image quality and ventricular volumetric and functional indices using either BH or FB C-SENSE cine bSSFP imaging were comparable to standard BH SENSE cine bSSFP imaging while maintaining nominally identical spatio-temporal resolution. This accelerated image acquisition provides an alternative to accommodate patients with impaired BH capacity.

Clinical evaluation of left ventricular function and morphology using an accelerated k-t sensitivity encoding method in cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Objectives

To provide clinical validation of a recent 2D SENSE-based accelerated cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) sequence (accelerated k-t SENSE), investigating whether this technique accurately quantifies left ventricle (LV) volumes, function, and mass as compared to 2D cine steady-state free precession (2D-SSFP).

Methods

Healthy volunteers (n = 16) and consecutive heart failure patients (n = 26) were scanned using a 1.5 T MRI system. Two LV short axis (SA) stacks were acquired: (1) accelerated k-t SENSE (5–6 breath-holds; temporal/spatial resolution: 37 ms/1.82 × 1.87 mm; acceleration factor = 4) and (2) standard 2D-SSFP (10–12 breath-holds; temporal/spatial resolution: 49 ms/1.67 × 1.87 mm, parallel imaging). Ascending aorta phase-contrast was performed on all volunteers as a reference to compare LV stroke volumes (LVSV) and validate the sequences. An image quality score for SA images was used, with lower scores indicating better quality (from 0 to 18).

Results

There was a high agreement between accelerated k-t SENSE and 2D-SSFP for LV measurements: bias (limits of agreement) of 2.4% (− 5.4% to 10.1%), 6.9 mL/m² (− 4.7 to 18.6 mL/m²), − 1.5 (− 8.3 to 5.2 mL/m²), and − 0.2 g/m² (− 11.9 to 12.3 g/m²) for LV ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume index, end-systolic volume index, and mass index, respectively. LVSV by accelerated k-t SENSE presented good agreement with aortic flow. Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities for all LV parameters were also high.

Conclusion

The accelerated k-t SENSE CMR sequence is clinically feasible and accurately quantifies LV volumes, function, and mass, with short acquisition time and good image quality.

Estimation of myocardial strain from non-rigid registration and highly accelerated cine CMR

Sparsely sampled cardiac cine accelerated acquisitions show promise for faster evaluation of left-ventricular function. Myocardial strain estimation using image feature tracking methods is also becoming widespread. However, it is not known whether highly accelerated acquisitions also provide reliable feature tracking strain estimates. Twenty patients and twenty healthy volunteers were imaged with conventional 14-beat/slice cine acquisition (STD), 4× accelerated 4-beat/slice acquisition with iterative reconstruction (R4), and a 9.2× accelerated 2-beat/slice real-time acquisition with sparse sampling and iterative reconstruction (R9.2). Radial and circumferential strains were calculated using non-rigid registration in the mid-ventricle short-axis slice and inter-observer errors were evaluated. Consistency was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and bias with Bland-Altman analysis. Peak circumferential strain magnitude was highly consistent between STD and R4 and R9.2 (ICC = 0.876 and 0.884, respectively). Average bias was -1.7 ± 2.0 %, p < 0.001, for R4 and -2.7 ± 1.9 %, p < 0.001 for R9.2. Peak radial strain was also highly consistent (ICC = 0.829 and 0.785, respectively), with average bias -11.2 ± 18.4 %, p < 0.001, for R4 and -15.0 ± 21.2 %, p < 0.001 for R9.2. STD circumferential strain could be predicted by linear regression from R9.2 with an R² of 0.82 and a root mean squared error of 1.8 %. Similarly, radial strain could be predicted with an R² of 0.67 and a root mean squared error of 21.3 %. Inter-observer errors were not significantly different between methods, except for peak circumferential strain R9.2 (1.1 ± 1.9 %) versus STD (0.3 ± 1.0 %), p = 0.011. Although small systematic differences were observed in strain, these were highly consistent with standard acquisitions, suggesting that accelerated myocardial strain is feasible and reliable in patients who require short acquisition durations.

Real-time SPARSE-SENSE cardiac cine MR imaging: optimization of image reconstruction and sequence validation

OBJECTIVES

Improved real-time cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) sequences have currently been introduced, but so far only limited practical experience exists. This study aimed at image reconstruction optimization and clinical validation of a new highly accelerated real-time cine SPARSE-SENSE sequence.

METHODS

Left ventricular (LV) short-axis stacks of a real-time free-breathing SPARSE-SENSE sequence with high spatiotemporal resolution and of a standard segmented cine SSFP sequence were acquired at 1.5 T in 11 volunteers and 15 patients. To determine the optimal iterations, all volunteers' SPARSE-SENSE images were reconstructed using 10-200 iterations, and contrast ratios, image entropies, and reconstruction times were assessed. Subsequently, the patients' SPARSE-SENSE images were reconstructed with the clinically optimal iterations. LV volumetric values were evaluated and compared between both sequences.

RESULTS

Sufficient image quality and acceptable reconstruction times were achieved when using 80 iterations. Bland-Altman plots and Passing-Bablok regression showed good agreement for all volumetric parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

80 iterations are recommended for iterative SPARSE-SENSE image reconstruction in clinical routine. Real-time cine SPARSE-SENSE yielded comparable volumetric results as the current standard SSFP sequence. Due to its intrinsic low image acquisition times, real-time cine SPARSE-SENSE imaging with iterative image reconstruction seems to be an attractive alternative for LV function analysis.

KEY POINTS

• A highly accelerated real-time CMR sequence using SPARSE-SENSE was evaluated. • SPARSE-SENSE allows free breathing in real-time cardiac cine imaging. • For clinically optimal SPARSE-SENSE image reconstruction, 80 iterations are recommended. • Real-time SPARSE-SENSE imaging yielded comparable volumetric results as the reference SSFP sequence. • The fast SPARSE-SENSE sequence is an attractive alternative to standard SSFP sequences.

Real-time aortic pulse wave velocity measurement during exercise stress testing

BACKGROUND

Pulse wave velocity (PWV), a measure of arterial stiffness, has been demonstrated to be an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This can be derived non-invasively using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Changes in PWV during exercise may reveal further information on vascular pathology. However, most known CMR methods for quantifying PWV are currently unsuitable for exercise stress testing.

METHODS

A velocity-sensitive real-time acquisition and evaluation (RACE) pulse sequence was adapted to provide interleaved acquisition of two locations in the descending aorta (at the level of the pulmonary artery bifurcation and above the renal arteries) at 7.8 ms temporal resolution. An automated method was used to calculate the foot-to-foot transit time of the velocity pulse wave. The RACE method was validated against a standard gated phase contrast (STD) method in flexible tube phantoms using a pulsatile flow pump. The method was applied in 50 healthy volunteers (28 males) aged 22-75 years using a MR-compatible cycle ergometer to achieve moderate work rate (38 ± 22 W, with a 31 ± 12 bpm increase in heart rate) in the supine position. Central pulse pressures were estimated using a MR-compatible brachial device. Scan-rescan reproducibility was evaluated in nine volunteers.

RESULTS

Phantom PWV was 22 m/s (STD) vs. 26 ± 5 m/s (RACE) for a butyl rubber tube, and 5.5 vs. 6.1 ± 0.3 m/s for a latex rubber tube. In healthy volunteers PWV increased with age at both rest (R(2) = 0.31 p < 0.001) and exercise (R(2) = 0.40, p < 0.001). PWV was significantly increased at exercise relative to rest (0.71 ± 2.2 m/s, p = 0.04). Scan-rescan reproducibility at rest was -0.21 ± 0.68 m/s (n = 9).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the validity of CMR in the evaluation of PWV during exercise in healthy subjects. The results support the feasibility of using this method in evaluating of patients with systemic aortic disease.

[Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: from imaging to diagnosis]

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has evolved over the past 20 years from a research-based imaging modality to an indispensable routine procedure in cardiac diagnostics. In addition to the morphological representation of cardiac anatomy, whereby only noninvasive multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is superior, another strength of CMR is the assessment of cardiac function and tissue differentiation. This requires that the radiologist performing the examination and analyzing the results has good knowledge of cardiac and thoracic anatomy and a detailed knowledge of the various cardiovascular diseases, hemodynamics, and pathophysiology. CMR reliably allows determination of a range of easy to determine quantitative parameters such as ventricular ejection fraction and also the valvular regurgitation fraction, which allows objective assessment of cardiac function. Especially the possibility to differentiate inflamed, viable, and ischemic tissue using adenosine stress MRI in the last 10 years has led to routine use of CMR. Even compared to competing nuclear medicine procedures, CMR is important for treatment decision-making and for prognosis estimation, thus, making it an indispensable component of cardiovascular diagnostics.

Accelerating global left-ventricular function assessment in mice using reduced slice acquisition and three-dimensional guide-point modelling

BACKGROUND

To investigate the utility of three-dimensional guide-point modeling (GPM) to reduce the time required for CMR evaluation of global cardiac function in mice, by reducing the number of image slices required for accurate quantification of left-ventricular (LV) mass and volumes.

METHODS

Five female C57Bl/6 mice 8 weeks post myocardial infarction induced by permanent occlusion of the left coronary artery, and six male control (un-operated) C57Bl/6 mice, were subject to CMR examination under isoflurane anaesthesia. Contiguous short axis (SAX) slices (1 mm thick 7-9 slices) were obtained together with two long axis (LAX) slices in two chamber and four chamber orientations. Using a mathematical model of the heart to interpolate information between the available slices, GPM LV mass and volumes were determined using full slice (all SAX and two LAX), six slice (four SAX and two LAX) and four slice (two SAX and two LAX) analysis protocols. All results were compared with standard manual volumetric analysis using all SAX slices.

RESULTS

Infarct size was 39.1±5.1% of LV myocardium. No significant differences were found in left ventricular mass and volumes between the standard and GPM full and six slice protocols in infarcted mice (113±10, 116±11, and 117±11 mg respectively for mass), or between the standard and GPM full, six and four slice protocols in control mice, (105±14, 106±10, 104±12, and 105±7 mg respectively for mass). Significant differences were found in LV mass (135±18 mg) and EF using the GPM four slice protocol in infarcted mice (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

GPM enables accurate analysis of LV function in mice with relatively large infarcts using a reduced six slice acquisition protocol, and in mice with normal/symmetrical left-ventricular topology using a four slice protocol.

[Cardiac functional analysis with MRI]

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are among the leading causes of death worldwide. Even in the 21(st) century CVD will still be the most frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. Precise evaluation of cardiac function is therefore mandatory for therapy planning and monitoring. In this article the contribution of MRI-based analysis of cardiac function will be addressed. Nowadays cine-MRI is considered as the standard of reference (SOR) in cardiac functional analysis. ECG-triggered steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequences are mainly used as they stand out due to short acquisition times and excellent contrast between the myocardium and the ventricular cavity. An indispensible requirement for cardiac functional analysis is an exact planning of the examination and based on that the coverage of the whole ventricle in short axial slices. By means of dedicated post-processing software, manual or semi-automatic segmentation of the endocardial and epicardial contours is necessary for functional analysis. In this way end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and the ejection fraction (EF) are defined and regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) can be detected.

Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2009

There were 56 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in 2009. The editors were impressed with the high quality of the submissions, of which our acceptance rate was about 40%. In accordance with open-access publishing, the articles go on-line as they are accepted with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. We have therefore chosen to briefly summarise the papers in this article for quick reference for our readers in broad areas of interest, which we feel will be useful to practitioners of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). In some cases where it is considered useful, the articles are also put into the wider context with a short narrative and recent CMR references. It has been a privilege to serve as the Editor of the JCMR this past year. I hope that you find the open-access system increases wider reading and citation of your papers, and that you will continue to send your quality manuscripts to JCMR for publication.