Patients on subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy are at risk of intramuscular injections

Modification of allergen subcutaneous immunotherapy safety precautions and systemic allergic reaction rate reduction

Background: Despite their life-threatening potential, medical team mistakes during subcutaneous immunotherapy are rarely discussed. Real data are missing, and a survey study estimated that dosing errors are responsible for 25% of systemic reactions during immunotherapy. To minimize errors, we modified our safety precautions and compared the rates of systemic allergic reactions before and after the change. Methods: Our retrospective comparative cohort study compared systemic allergic reaction rates during 2012-2015 and 2016-2019, after a second check of the injected allergen/s by another nurse/physician was added to the treatment protocol. Results: The rate of systemic allergic reaction per injection was reduced from 0.93 to 0.71%; p = 0.023. Conclusion: A second check prior to injection is beneficial and can reduce the allergic reaction rate during immunotherapy.

Chinese Guideline on Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: The 2022 Update

In the last few decades, there has been a progressive increase in the prevalence of allergic rhinitis (AR) in China, where it now affects approximately 250 million people. AR prevention and treatment include allergen avoidance, pharmacotherapy, allergen immunotherapy (AIT), and patient education, among which AIT is the only curative intervention. AIT targets the disease etiology and may potentially modify the immune system as well as induce allergen-specific immune tolerance in patients with AR. In 2017, a team of experts from the Chinese Society of Allergy (CSA) and the Chinese Allergic Rhinitis Collaborative Research Group (C2AR2G) produced the first English version of Chinese AIT guidelines for AR. Since then, there has been considerable progress in basic research of and clinical practice for AIT, especially regarding the role of follicular regulatory T (TFR) cells in the pathogenesis of AR and the use of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) in nasal secretions for the diagnosis of AR. Additionally, potential biomarkers, including TFR cells, sIgG4, and sIgE, have been used to monitor the incidence and progression of AR. Moreover, there has been a novel understanding of AIT during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Hence, there was an urgent need to update the AIT guideline for AR by a team of experts from CSA and C2AR2G. This document aims to serve as professional reference material on AIT for AR treatment in China, thus improving the development of AIT across the world.

Systemic reactions to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy: real-world cause and effect modelling

Background

Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is an effective treatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. However, adverse events, including life-threatening systemic reactions, may occur. The purpose of this project is to identify risk factors for systemic reactions to SCIT and to provide practice-based solutions using a quality improvement (QI) framework.

Methods

A QI initiative was performed in a hospital-based, Canadian Allergy clinic administering SCIT in a 12-month period.

Results

A total of 4242 injections of SCIT were performed over a period of 12 months. Of these, 10 injections resulted in a systemic reaction requiring epinephrine administration (i.e., an incidence of 1 in 424 injections, or 0.24%). Eight patients had at least one documented risk factor for a systemic reaction, and six had multiple risk factors. Major risk factors included seasonal exacerbation of allergic rhinitis, uncontrolled asthma, and an error in route of administration. All reactions occurred with the highest allergen extract concentration.

Conclusion

This QI initiative highlights the need for improved patient and health care practitioner education and pre-administration screening. We suggest several considerations for SCIT administration: provide patients with written information on safety; screen patients before injections, including a review of treatment plan adherence and asthma control; adjust dosing to slow down buildup of the most concentrated immunotherapy extract, particularly in high risk patients; and apply additional safety measures in patients with multiple risk factors.

It is no skin off my nose: The relationship between the skin and allergic rhinitis

OBJECTIVE

Evidence supports the relationship between the skin barrier and allergic conditions. This narrative review evaluates what role the cutaneous barrier may play in the pathogenesis, disease course, and management of allergic rhinitis (AR).

DATA SOURCES

A literature review of the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane, and SCOPUS Sciverse databases was conducted to identify available evidence. Reference lists of pertinent papers were searched using a snowball technique.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Papers published in English from all years until December 2020 were included. Papers that did not address the relationship between AR and the skin and hypothesis papers were excluded.

RESULTS

The cutaneous barrier shares histologic characteristics with the sinonasal epithelial barrier, which may explain commonalities between AR and atopic dermatitis. A disruption in the epithelial barrier could be a common pathway in the development of multiple allergic conditions. The skin is a common target for the treatment of AR. Available data that look at the relationship between the skin and AR often include other topics such as other atopic disorders and the role of the epithelial barrier. Increased understanding of how the cutaneous barrier affects AR may lead to new innovations in its management.

CONCLUSION

The connection between the cutaneous barrier and AR holds possibilities for further investigation, and these may lead to a better understanding and future innovations for all atopic diseases.

User experience for manual injection of 2 mL viscous solutions is enhanced by a new prefillable syringe with a staked 8 mm ultra-thin wall needle

OBJECTIVES

User experience was compared between a new pre-fillable 2.25 mL glass syringe equipped with an ultra-thin-wall (UTW) 8 mm staked needle and a marketed BD Neopak™ syringe equipped with a special-thin-wall (STW) 12.7 mm staked needle.

METHODS

Participants simulated subcutaneous injections with both syringes alone (formative Human Factors study) and in combination with a needlestick-prevention device (validation Human Factors study).

RESULTS

Usability results of both studies showed higher success rates for delivering the full dose of 2 mL viscous solution (30 cP) with the 8mmUTW syringe than with the 12.7mmSTW one (63% vs. 42% in the formative study). The use of the 8mmUTW syringe demonstrated also better ease of use and acceptance results and 72% of formative study participants preferred this new syringe over the current one when delivering the viscous solution. Using a shorter needle also showed a benefit in decreasing the injection-related anxiety. Besides, in the case of a non-recommended injection technique, the calculated risk of accidental intramuscular injection is reduced by 2 to 13 times with the 8mmUTW syringe.

CONCLUSION

Altogether, the results obtained demonstrated an improvement of the user experience with this new syringe compared to the current one in the manual delivery of 2 mL viscous solutions.

Allergy…No more fear of needles!

Needleless injection systems are nowadays widespread and are mainly used to overcome the common problems of needle injection systems, such as pain, hematoma, scar tissue formation, infection or abscess, possibility of accidentally injecting into a venous vessel, and transmission of infectious diseases. All these problems are independent of the type of drug injected and are exclusively related to the needle devices. Current needleless injection systems are a valuable tool, which is especially available for the administration of vaccines to large numbers of patients. Our experience focused in particular on the so-called "jet injectors," of which one of the most valid representatives is Injex®. Our patent essentially concerns a medical needleless device, suitable to inject a subcutaneous AIT (allergy immunotherapy). The mechanism at the base of our device works with compressed air by means of a spring: It is very simple and similar to that of compressed air guns. Once the syringe has been filled, it is placed perpendicular to the skin, and then, the device is activated. The pressure vaporizes the drug, without changing or altering its chemical structure; it makes it pass through the epidermis, until it quickly reaches the subcutaneous layer, at a depth between 3.2 and 9.1 mm, without the patient feeling any pain. The entrance hole made by the needleless device in the epidermis is 0.17 mm rather than 0.39 mm of a normal needle. This type of administration also allows a uniform and spray diffusion of the drug, without causing localized inflammation, as it sometimes happens with normal syringe.

Point-of-care ultrasonography in the allergy and immunology clinic

OBJECTIVE

To summarize evidence supporting the use of point-of-care ultrasonography as a clinical tool for allergists and immunologists.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched for articles published before December 18, 2018.

STUDY SELECTIONS

We included any retrospective or prospective study that evaluated ultrasonography in allergy and immunology and epinephrine autoinjector (EAI) needle length.

RESULTS

The standard EAI needle length may be inadequate for intramuscular delivery of epinephrine, particularly for women, at risk of anaphylaxis. In patients who weigh less than 15 kg, the lengths of commercially available EAIs may be too long, risking inadvertent intraosseous injection and resultant complications. Ultrasonography can be routinely used in the allergy clinic to guide needle length and angle for subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy injections to minimize systemic adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Point-of-care ultrasonography can be a useful tool to enhance patient care and safety in an allergy clinic. Ideally, all patients prescribed EAIs should have ultrasonographic measurement of the skin to muscle distance and skin to bone distance to assist in identifying patients at risk of subcutaneous or intraosseous injection in anaphylaxis and those at risk of intramuscular injection during subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy injections.

Chinese Guideline on allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis

The present document is based on a consensus reached by a panel of experts from Chinese Society of Allergy (CSA) and Chinese Allergic Rhinitis Collaborative Research Group (C2AR2G). Allergen immunotherapy (AIT), has increasingly been used as a treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) globally, as it has been shown to provide a long-term effect in improving nasal and ocular symptoms, reducing medication need, and improving quality of life. AIT is currently the only curative intervention that can potentially modify the immune system in individuals suffering from AR and prevent the development of new sensitization and the progression of disease from AR to asthma. Although the use of AIT is becoming more acceptable in China, to date no AR immunotherapy guideline from China is available for use by the international community. This document has thus been produced and covers the main aspects of AIT undertaken in China; including selection of patients for AIT, the allergen extracts available on the Chinese market, schedules and doses of allergen employed in different routes of AIT, assessment of effect and safety, patients' administration and follow-up, and management of adverse reactions. The Chinese guideline for AR immunotherapy will thus serve as a reference point by doctors, healthcare professionals and organizations involved in the AIT of AR in China. Moreover, this guideline will serve as a source of information for the international community on AIT treatment strategies employed in China.

Risk of systemic allergic reactions to allergen immunotherapy in a pediatric allergy clinic in Turkey

OBJECTIVES

Even though allergen immunotherapy is an effective treatment method that has been used on rhinitis, asthma and venom anaphylaxis for over 100 years, systemic reactions (SRs) limit the use of this treatment method. We classified SRs associated with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) according to the World Allergy Organization Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Systemic Reaction Grading System. Risk factors for the SRs were assessed.

METHODS

In this study 67,758 injections to 1350 children with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma were analyzed throughout January 1999-December 2014.

RESULTS

A total of 51 systemic reactions were observed in 39 patients (0.075% per injection, %3 per patient). Mean age of SRs observed patients was 13±2.6 years (range 9.5-16 years) and 64.1% were male, 35.9% were female. 51.3% of SRs were grade 1, 38.5% grade 2, 7.7% grade 3 and 2.6% grade 4. SRs were early onset in 41% of the patients and delayed onset in 59%. 76.9% of SRs were seen during maintenance therapy and 56.4% during peak pollen season. In 28.2% of cases previous local reactions and in 30.8% previous grade 1 reactions were determined. There was no fatal outcome from any of the SRs.

CONCLUSION

SCIT related SRs are generally of mild severity. Although only 10% of the SRs were grade 3 or 4, there is a still a small risk of severe reactions. 76.9% of SRs were observed during maintenance therapy. Delayed-onset SRs rate in our study is 59%. So both clinicians and parents should be alert about the delayed reactions after SCIT.

Incidence and risk factors for subcutaneous immunotherapy anaphylaxis: the optimization of safety

Fatal reactions related to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy are rare: one event in 2.5 million injections has been reported in the USA and none in Europe. The prevalence of very severe systemic reactions (systemic adverse events [SAEs]) is one in 1 million injections. Though the serious events rate is decreasing and the majority of SAEs (∼0.2% per injection) are moderate and reversible, they still represent a major concern. Uncontrolled asthma, long-term therapy with β-blockers and high degree of allergen sensitivity are generally considered risk factors. The relevance of other conditions, like previous local reactions, the use of extracts conjugated with adjuvants and accelerated build-up schedules is controversial, as well as the role of preventative strategies. A careful risk assessment of patients and optimal administration procedures may significantly decrease the risk of SAEs. However, more uniform safety data are required and an accurate safety profile should be provided for every allergen product.