1
|
Mintz HP, Dosanjh A, Parsons HM, Hughes A, Jakeman A, Pope AM, Bryan RT, James ND, Patel P. Development and validation of a follow-up methodology for a randomised controlled trial, utilising routine clinical data as an alternative to traditional designs: a pilot study to assess the feasibility of use for the BladderPath trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020; 6:165. [PMID: 33292682 PMCID: PMC7599120 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00713-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Bladder cancer outcomes have not changed significantly in 30 years; the BladderPath trial (Image Directed Redesign of Bladder Cancer Treatment Pathway, ISRCTN35296862) proposes to evaluate a modified pathway for diagnosis and treatment ensuring appropriate pathways are undertaken earlier to improve outcomes. We are piloting a novel data collection technique based on routine National Health Service (NHS) data, with no traditional patient-Health Care Professional contact after recruitment, where trial data are traditionally collected on case report forms. Data will be collected from routine administrative sources and validated via data queries to sites. We report here the feasibility and pre-trial methodological development and validation of the schema proposed for BladderPath. Methods Locally treated patient cohorts were utilised for routine data validation (hospital interactions data (HID) and administrative radiotherapy department data (RTD)). Single site events of interest were algorithmically extracted from the 2008–2018 HID and validated against reference datasets to determine detection sensitivity. Survival analysis was performed using RTD and HID data. Hazard ratios and survival statistics were calculated estimating treatment effects and further validating and assessing the scope of routine data. Results Overall, 829/1042 (sensitivity 0.80) events of interest were identified in the HID, with varying levels of sensitivity; identifying, 202/206 (sensitivity 0.98; PPV 0.96) surgical events but only 391/568 (sensitivity 0.69; PPV 0.95) radiotherapy regimens. An overall temporal quality improvement trend was present: detecting 41/117 events (35%) in 2011 to 104/109 (95%) in 2017 (all event types). Using the RTD, 5-year survival rates were 43% (95% CI 25–59%) in the chemoradiotherapy group and 30% (95% CI 23–36%) in the radiotherapy group; using the HID, the 5-year radical cystectomy survival rate was 57% (95% CI 50–63%). Conclusions Routine data are a feasible method for trial data collection. As long as events of interest are pre-validated, very high sensitivities for trial conduct can be achieved and further improved with targeted data queries. Outcomes can also be produced comparable to clinical trial and national dataset results. Given the real-time, obligatory nature of the HID, which forms the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data, alongside other datasets, we believe routine data extraction and validation is a robust way of rapidly collecting datasets for trials. Supplementary Information Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s40814-020-00713-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet P Mintz
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.,University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
| | - Amandeep Dosanjh
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Helen M Parsons
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Ana Hughes
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Alicia Jakeman
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
| | - Ann M Pope
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Richard T Bryan
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | | | - Nicholas D James
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, UK.,The Royal Marsden NHS foundation Trust, Fulham Road, Chelsea, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Prashant Patel
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK. .,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santos E, Broussy S, Lesaine E, Saillour F, Rouanet F, Dehail P, Joseph PA, Aly F, Sibon I, Glize B. Post-stroke follow-up: Time to organize. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2019; 175:59-64. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.02.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Revised: 11/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
3
|
Bridgwood B, Lager KE, Mistri AK, Khunti K, Wilson AD, Modi P. Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 5:CD009103. [PMID: 29734470 PMCID: PMC6494626 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009103.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) are at increased risk of future stroke and other cardiovascular events. Stroke services need to be configured to maximise the adoption of evidence-based strategies for secondary stroke prevention. Smoking-related interventions were examined in a separate review so were not considered in this review. This is an update of our 2014 review. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of stroke service interventions for implementing secondary stroke prevention strategies on modifiable risk factor control, including patient adherence to prescribed medications, and the occurrence of secondary cardiovascular events. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (April 2017), the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group Trials Register (April 2017), CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library 2017, issue 3), MEDLINE (1950 to April 2017), Embase (1981 to April 2017) and 10 additional databases including clinical trials registers. We located further studies by searching reference lists of articles and contacting authors of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of organisational or educational and behavioural interventions (compared with usual care) on modifiable risk factor control for secondary stroke prevention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Four review authors selected studies for inclusion and independently extracted data. The quality of the evidence as 'high', 'moderate', 'low' or 'very low' according to the GRADE approach (GRADEpro GDT).Three review authors assessed the risk of bias for the included studies. We sought missing data from trialists.The results are presented in 'Summary of findings' tables. MAIN RESULTS The updated review included 16 new studies involving 25,819 participants, resulting in a total of 42 studies including 33,840 participants. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and assessed three studies at high risk of bias; the remainder were considered to have a low risk of bias. We included 26 studies that predominantly evaluated organisational interventions and 16 that evaluated educational and behavioural interventions for participants. We pooled results where appropriate, although some clinical and methodological heterogeneity was present.Educational and behavioural interventions showed no clear differences on any of the review outcomes, which include mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean body mass index, achievement of HbA1c target, lipid profile, mean HbA1c level, medication adherence, or recurrent cardiovascular events. There was moderate-quality evidence that organisational interventions resulted in improved blood pressure control, in particular an improvement in achieving target blood pressure (odds ratio (OR) 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09 to1.90; 13 studies; 23,631 participants). However, there were no significant changes in mean systolic blood pressure (mean difference (MD), -1.58 mmHg 95% CI -4.66 to 1.51; 16 studies; 17,490 participants) and mean diastolic blood pressure (MD -0.91 mmHg 95% CI -2.75 to 0.93; 14 studies; 17,178 participants). There were no significant changes in the remaining review outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found that organisational interventions may be associated with an improvement in achieving blood pressure target but we did not find any clear evidence that these interventions improve other modifiable risk factors (lipid profile, HbA1c, medication adherence) or reduce the incidence of recurrent cardiovascular events. Interventions, including patient education alone, did not lead to improvements in modifiable risk factor control or the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernadeta Bridgwood
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, UK, LE1 7RH
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hemingway H, Asselbergs FW, Danesh J, Dobson R, Maniadakis N, Maggioni A, van Thiel GJM, Cronin M, Brobert G, Vardas P, Anker SD, Grobbee DE, Denaxas S. Big data from electronic health records for early and late translational cardiovascular research: challenges and potential. Eur Heart J 2018; 39:1481-1495. [PMID: 29370377 PMCID: PMC6019015 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Revised: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 08/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Cohorts of millions of people's health records, whole genome sequencing, imaging, sensor, societal and publicly available data present a rapidly expanding digital trace of health. We aimed to critically review, for the first time, the challenges and potential of big data across early and late stages of translational cardiovascular disease research. Methods and results We sought exemplars based on literature reviews and expertise across the BigData@Heart Consortium. We identified formidable challenges including: data quality, knowing what data exist, the legal and ethical framework for their use, data sharing, building and maintaining public trust, developing standards for defining disease, developing tools for scalable, replicable science and equipping the clinical and scientific work force with new inter-disciplinary skills. Opportunities claimed for big health record data include: richer profiles of health and disease from birth to death and from the molecular to the societal scale; accelerated understanding of disease causation and progression, discovery of new mechanisms and treatment-relevant disease sub-phenotypes, understanding health and diseases in whole populations and whole health systems and returning actionable feedback loops to improve (and potentially disrupt) existing models of research and care, with greater efficiency. In early translational research we identified exemplars including: discovery of fundamental biological processes e.g. linking exome sequences to lifelong electronic health records (EHR) (e.g. human knockout experiments); drug development: genomic approaches to drug target validation; precision medicine: e.g. DNA integrated into hospital EHR for pre-emptive pharmacogenomics. In late translational research we identified exemplars including: learning health systems with outcome trials integrated into clinical care; citizen driven health with 24/7 multi-parameter patient monitoring to improve outcomes and population-based linkages of multiple EHR sources for higher resolution clinical epidemiology and public health. Conclusion High volumes of inherently diverse ('big') EHR data are beginning to disrupt the nature of cardiovascular research and care. Such big data have the potential to improve our understanding of disease causation and classification relevant for early translation and to contribute actionable analytics to improve health and healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Hemingway
- Research Department of Clinical Epidemiology, The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK
- The National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Folkert W Asselbergs
- Research Department of Clinical Epidemiology, The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK
- The National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - John Danesh
- MRC/BHF Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Richard Dobson
- Research Department of Clinical Epidemiology, The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK
- The National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health (IOP), King‘s College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Nikolaos Maniadakis
- European Society of Cardiology (ESC), 2035 Route des Colles, Les Templiers - CS 80179 Biot, 06903 Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Aldo Maggioni
- European Society of Cardiology (ESC), 2035 Route des Colles, Les Templiers - CS 80179 Biot, 06903 Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Ghislaine J M van Thiel
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen Cronin
- Vifor Pharma Ltd, lughofstrasse 61, 8152 Glattbrugg, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gunnar Brobert
- Department of Epidemiology, Bayer Pharma AG, Müllerstrasse 178, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Panos Vardas
- European Society of Cardiology (ESC), 2035 Route des Colles, Les Templiers - CS 80179 Biot, 06903 Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Stefan D Anker
- Division of Cardiology and Metabolism—Heart Failure, Cachexia & Sarcopenia; Department of Cardiology (CVK), Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité University Medicine, Charitépl. 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medicine Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Diederick E Grobbee
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Spiros Denaxas
- Research Department of Clinical Epidemiology, The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK
- The National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gentil ML, Cuggia M, Fiquet L, Hagenbourger C, Le Berre T, Banâtre A, Renault E, Bouzille G, Chapron A. Factors influencing the development of primary care data collection projects from electronic health records: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17:139. [PMID: 28946908 PMCID: PMC5613384 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0538-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary care data gathered from Electronic Health Records are of the utmost interest considering the essential role of general practitioners (GPs) as coordinators of patient care. These data represent the synthesis of the patient history and also give a comprehensive picture of the population health status. Nevertheless, discrepancies between countries exist concerning routine data collection projects. Therefore, we wanted to identify elements that influence the development and durability of such projects. METHODS A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed database to identify worldwide current primary care data collection projects. The gray literature was also searched via official project websites and their contact person was emailed to obtain information on the project managers. Data were retrieved from the included studies using a standardized form, screening four aspects: projects features, technological infrastructure, GPs' roles, data collection network organization. RESULTS The literature search allowed identifying 36 routine data collection networks, mostly in English-speaking countries: CPRD and THIN in the United Kingdom, the Veterans Health Administration project in the United States, EMRALD and CPCSSN in Canada. These projects had in common the use of technical facilities that range from extraction tools to comprehensive computing platforms. Moreover, GPs initiated the extraction process and benefited from incentives for their participation. Finally, analysis of the literature data highlighted that governmental services, academic institutions, including departments of general practice, and software companies, are pivotal for the promotion and durability of primary care data collection projects. CONCLUSION Solid technical facilities and strong academic and governmental support are required for promoting and supporting long-term and wide-range primary care data collection projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Line Gentil
- Department of General Practice, University of Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France.
- CIC (Clinical investigation center) INSERM 1414, F-35000, Rennes, France.
| | - Marc Cuggia
- INSERM, U1099, F-35000, Rennes, France
- University of Rennes 1, LTSI (Laboratory for signal and image processing), F-35000, Rennes, France
- CHU Rennes, CIC Inserm 1414, F-35000, Rennes, France
- CHU Rennes, Centre de Données Cliniques, F-35000, Rennes, France
| | - Laure Fiquet
- Department of General Practice, University of Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France
- CIC (Clinical investigation center) INSERM 1414, F-35000, Rennes, France
| | | | - Thomas Le Berre
- Department of General Practice, University of Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France
| | - Agnès Banâtre
- Department of General Practice, University of Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France
- CIC (Clinical investigation center) INSERM 1414, F-35000, Rennes, France
| | - Eric Renault
- University of Rennes 1, LTSI (Laboratory for signal and image processing), F-35000, Rennes, France
| | - Guillaume Bouzille
- INSERM, U1099, F-35000, Rennes, France
- University of Rennes 1, LTSI (Laboratory for signal and image processing), F-35000, Rennes, France
- CHU Rennes, CIC Inserm 1414, F-35000, Rennes, France
- CHU Rennes, Centre de Données Cliniques, F-35000, Rennes, France
| | - Anthony Chapron
- Department of General Practice, University of Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France
- CIC (Clinical investigation center) INSERM 1414, F-35000, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lauer MS, Gordon D, Wei G, Pearson G. Efficient design of clinical trials and epidemiological research: is it possible? Nat Rev Cardiol 2017; 14:493-501. [PMID: 28447664 DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Randomized clinical trials and large-scale, cohort studies continue to have a critical role in generating evidence in cardiovascular medicine; however, the increasing concern is that ballooning costs threaten the clinical trial enterprise. In this Perspectives article, we discuss the changing landscape of clinical research, and clinical trials in particular, focusing on reasons for the increasing costs and inefficiencies. These reasons include excessively complex design, overly restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria, burdensome regulations, excessive source-data verification, and concerns about the effect of clinical research conduct on workflow. Thought leaders have called on the clinical research community to consider alternative, transformative business models, including those models that focus on simplicity and leveraging of digital resources. We present some examples of innovative approaches by which some investigators have successfully conducted large-scale, clinical trials at relatively low cost. These examples include randomized registry trials, cluster-randomized trials, adaptive trials, and trials that are fully embedded within digital clinical care or administrative platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Lauer
- National Institutes of Health Office of Extramural Research, One Center Drive, Building 1, Room 144, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - David Gordon
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 8th Floor, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Gina Wei
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 8th Floor, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Gail Pearson
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 8th Floor, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gulliford MC, van Staa TP, McDermott L, McCann G, Charlton J, Dregan A. Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study). Trials 2014; 15:220. [PMID: 24919485 PMCID: PMC4062282 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2014] [Accepted: 05/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is growing interest in conducting clinical and cluster randomized trials through electronic health records. This paper reports on the methodological issues identified during the implementation of two cluster randomized trials using the electronic health records of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Methods Two trials were completed in primary care: one aimed to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infection; the other aimed to increase physician adherence with secondary prevention interventions after first stroke. The paper draws on documentary records and trial datasets to report on the methodological experience with respect to research ethics and research governance approval, general practice recruitment and allocation, sample size calculation and power, intervention implementation, and trial analysis. Results We obtained research governance approvals from more than 150 primary care organizations in England, Wales, and Scotland. There were 104 CPRD general practices recruited to the antibiotic trial and 106 to the stroke trial, with the target number of practices being recruited within six months. Interventions were installed into practice information systems remotely over the internet. The mean number of participants per practice was 5,588 in the antibiotic trial and 110 in the stroke trial, with the coefficient of variation of practice sizes being 0.53 and 0.56 respectively. Outcome measures showed substantial correlations between the 12 months before, and after intervention, with coefficients ranging from 0.42 for diastolic blood pressure to 0.91 for proportion of consultations with antibiotics prescribed, defining practice and participant eligibility for analysis requires careful consideration. Conclusions Cluster randomized trials may be performed efficiently in large samples from UK general practices using the electronic health records of a primary care database. The geographical dispersal of trial sites presents a difficulty for research governance approval and intervention implementation. Pretrial data analyses should inform trial design and analysis plans. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 47558792 and ISRCTN 35701810 (both registered on 17 March 2010).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin C Gulliford
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, Capital House, 42 Weston St, London SE1 3QD, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dregan A, van Staa TP, McDermott L, McCann G, Ashworth M, Charlton J, Wolfe CDA, Rudd A, Yardley L, Gulliford MC, Trial Steering Committee. Point-of-care cluster randomized trial in stroke secondary prevention using electronic health records. Stroke 2014; 45:2066-71. [PMID: 24903985 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.114.005713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the remote introduction of electronic decision support tools into family practices improves risk factor control after first stroke. This study also aimed to develop methods to implement cluster randomized trials in stroke using electronic health records. METHODS Family practices were recruited from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink and allocated to intervention and control trial arms by minimization. Remotely installed, electronic decision support tools promoted intensified secondary prevention for 12 months with last measure of systolic blood pressure as the primary outcome. Outcome data from electronic health records were analyzed using marginal models. RESULTS There were 106 Clinical Practice Research Datalink family practices allocated (intervention, 53; control, 53), with 11 391 (control, 5516; intervention, 5875) participants with acute stroke ever diagnosed. Participants at trial practices had similar characteristics as 47,887 patients with stroke at nontrial practices. During the intervention period, blood pressure values were recorded in the electronic health records for 90% and cholesterol values for 84% of participants. After intervention, the latest mean systolic blood pressure was 131.7 (SD, 16.8) mm Hg in the control trial arm and 131.4 (16.7) mm Hg in the intervention trial arm, and adjusted mean difference was -0.56 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -1.38 to 0.26; P=0.183). The financial cost of the trial was approximately US $22 per participant, or US $2400 per family practice allocated. CONCLUSIONS Large pragmatic intervention studies may be implemented at low cost by using electronic health records. The intervention used in this trial was not found to be effective, and further research is needed to develop more effective intervention strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL http://www.controlled-trials.com. Current Controlled Trials identifier: ISRCTN35701810.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Dregan
- From the Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., L.M., M.A., J.C., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S., G.M.); London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S.); and Division of Community Clinical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom (L.M., L.Y.)
| | - Tjeerd P van Staa
- From the Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., L.M., M.A., J.C., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S., G.M.); London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S.); and Division of Community Clinical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom (L.M., L.Y.)
| | - Lisa McDermott
- From the Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., L.M., M.A., J.C., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S., G.M.); London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S.); and Division of Community Clinical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom (L.M., L.Y.)
| | - Gerard McCann
- From the Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., L.M., M.A., J.C., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S., G.M.); London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S.); and Division of Community Clinical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom (L.M., L.Y.)
| | - Mark Ashworth
- From the Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., L.M., M.A., J.C., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S., G.M.); London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S.); and Division of Community Clinical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom (L.M., L.Y.)
| | - Judith Charlton
- From the Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., L.M., M.A., J.C., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S., G.M.); London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S.); and Division of Community Clinical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom (L.M., L.Y.)
| | - Charles D A Wolfe
- From the Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., L.M., M.A., J.C., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S., G.M.); London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S.); and Division of Community Clinical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom (L.M., L.Y.)
| | - Anthony Rudd
- From the Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., L.M., M.A., J.C., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S., G.M.); London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S.); and Division of Community Clinical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom (L.M., L.Y.)
| | - Lucy Yardley
- From the Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., L.M., M.A., J.C., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S., G.M.); London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S.); and Division of Community Clinical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom (L.M., L.Y.)
| | - Martin C Gulliford
- From the Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., L.M., M.A., J.C., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London, London, United Kingdom (A.D., C.D.A.W., A.R., M.C.G.); Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S., G.M.); London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (T.P.v.S.); and Division of Community Clinical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom (L.M., L.Y.).
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lager KE, Mistri AK, Khunti K, Haunton VJ, Sett AK, Wilson AD. Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD009103. [PMID: 24789063 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009103.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) are at increased risk of future stroke and other cardiovascular events. Evidence-based strategies for secondary stroke prevention have been established. However, the implementation of prevention strategies could be improved. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of stroke service interventions for implementing secondary stroke prevention strategies on modifiable risk factor control, including patient adherence to prescribed medications, and the occurrence of secondary cardiovascular events. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (April 2013), the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group Trials Register (April 2013), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, issue 3), MEDLINE (1950 to April 2013), EMBASE (1981 to April 2013) and 10 additional databases. We located further studies by searching reference lists of articles and contacting authors of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of organisational or educational and behavioural interventions (compared with usual care) on modifiable risk factor control for secondary stroke prevention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors selected studies for inclusion and independently extracted data. One review author assessed the risk of bias for the included studies. We sought missing data from trialists. MAIN RESULTS This review included 26 studies involving 8021 participants. Overall the studies were of reasonable quality, but one study was considered at high risk of bias. Fifteen studies evaluated predominantly organisational interventions and 11 studies evaluated educational and behavioural interventions for patients. Results were pooled where appropriate, although some clinical and methodological heterogeneity was present. The estimated effects of organisational interventions were compatible with improvements and no differences in the modifiable risk factors mean systolic blood pressure (mean difference (MD) -2.57 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.46 to 0.31), mean diastolic blood pressure (MD -0.90 mmHg; 95% CI -2.49 to 0.68), blood pressure target achievement (OR 1.24; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.64) and mean body mass index (MD -0.68 kg/m(2); 95% CI -1.46 to 0.11). There were no significant effects of organisational interventions on lipid profile, HbA1c, medication adherence or recurrent cardiovascular events. Educational and behavioural interventions were not generally associated with clear differences in any of the review outcomes, with only two exceptions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Pooled results indicated that educational interventions were not associated with clear differences in any of the review outcomes. The estimated effects of organisational interventions were compatible with improvements and no differences in several modifiable risk factors. We identified a large number of ongoing studies, suggesting that research in this area is increasing. The use of standardised outcome measures would facilitate the synthesis of future research findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate E Lager
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22-28 Princess Road West, Leicester, UK, LE1 6TP
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Development of predictive genetic tests for improving the safety of new medicines: the utilization of routinely collected electronic health records. Drug Discov Today 2013; 19:361-6. [PMID: 24239729 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2013] [Revised: 10/03/2013] [Accepted: 11/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Serious adverse drug reactions are an important cause of hospitalization and can result in the withdrawal of licensed drugs. Genetic variation has been shown to influence adverse drug reaction susceptibility, and predictive genetic tests have been developed for a limited number of adverse drug reactions. The identification of patients with adverse drug reactions, obtaining samples for genetic analysis and rigorous evaluation of clinical test effectiveness represent significant challenges to predictive genetic test development. Using the example of serious drug-induced liver injury, we illustrate how a database of routinely collected electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to overcome these barriers by facilitating rapid recruitment to genome-wide association studies and supporting efficient randomized controlled trials of predictive genetic test effectiveness.
Collapse
|
11
|
Holt TA, Fitzmaurice DA, Marshall T, Fay M, Qureshi N, Dalton ARH, Hobbs FDR, Lasserson DS, Kearley K, Hislop J, Jin J. Automated Risk Assessment for Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation (AURAS-AF)--an automated software system to promote anticoagulation and reduce stroke risk: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14:385. [PMID: 24220602 PMCID: PMC4225760 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2013] [Accepted: 10/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at significantly increased risk of stroke. Oral anticoagulants (OACs) substantially reduce this risk, with gains seen across the spectrum of baseline risk. Despite the benefit to patients, OAC prescribing remains suboptimal in the United Kingdom (UK). We will investigate whether an automated software system, operating within primary care electronic medical records, can improve the management of AF by identifying patients eligible for OAC therapy and increasing uptake of this treatment. Methods/Design We will conduct a cluster randomised controlled trial, involving general practices using the Egton Medical Information Systems (EMIS) Web clinical system. We will randomise practices to use an electronic software tool or to continue with usual care. The tool will a) produce (and continually refresh) a list of patients with AF who are eligible for OAC therapy - practices will invite these patients to discuss therapy at the start of the trial - and b) generate electronic screen reminders in the medical records of those eligible, appearing throughout the trial. The software will run for 6 months in 23 intervention practices. A total of 23 control practices will manage their AF register in line with the usual care offered. The primary outcome is change in proportion of eligible patients with AF who have been prescribed OAC therapy after six months. Secondary outcomes are incidence of stroke, transient ischaemic attack, other major thromboembolism, major haemorrhage and reports of inappropriate OAC prescribing in the data collection sample - those deemed eligible for OACs. We will conduct a process evaluation in parallel with the randomised trial. We will use qualitative methods to examine patient and practitioner views of the intervention and its impact on primary care practice, including its time implications. Discussion AURAS-AF will investigate whether a simple intervention, using electronic primary care records, can improve OAC uptake in a high risk group for stroke. Given previous concerns about safety, especially surrounding inappropriate prescribing, we will also examine whether electronic reminders safely impact care in this clinical area. Trial registration http://ISRCTN 55722437
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim A Holt
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, England.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|