1
|
Mizuno Y, Yokoyama Y, Nakajima H, Inoue T, Tanaka S, Nagaya M, Inokawa Y, Ando M, Nishida Y, Ebata T. The impact of goal-directed prehabilitation therapy on functional capacity in patients undergoing hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Surgery 2024; 176:252-258. [PMID: 38755033 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emerging evidence has supported the idea that goal-directed prehabilitation is a promising approach to boost functional capacity in preoperative patients. However, its usefulness has not been tested in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic fields. The objective of this trial was to investigate the efficacy of goal-directed prehabilitation for improving functional capacity in patients who were planned to undergo major hepatobiliary and pancreatic operations. METHODS This assessor-blinded, parallel-arm, randomized clinical trial recruited patients who were scheduled for major hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeries for malignancy. Patients were randomly allocated into the step goal-directed prehabilitation group as the test group and into the conventional prehabilitation group as the control group. Patients in the goal-directed prehabilitation group participated in a walking prehabilitation program with an intergrading goal of the step count. Patients in the conventional prehabilitation group received standard physical and nutritional prehabilitation. The primary outcome was change in the 6-minute walking distance, which ranged from the time before starting prehabilitation (baseline) to the time after completing prehabilitation (immediately before surgery). RESULTS Among 180 randomized patients, 144 patients were included in the primary analysis (73 patients in the conventional prehabilitation group and 71 patients in the goal-directed prehabilitation group). The mean change in the 6-minute walking distance was 27 meters in the conventional prehabilitation group and 31 meters in the goal-directed prehabilitation group (P = .633). CONCLUSION In patients undergoing major hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeries for malignancies, a goal-directed prehabilitation program did not result in a significantly greater increase in functional capacity than did conventional prehabilitation. REGISTRATION NUMBER UMIN000038791 (https://www.umin.ac.jp/).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yota Mizuno
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Yokoyama
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
| | - Hiroki Nakajima
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takayuki Inoue
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shinya Tanaka
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Motoki Nagaya
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoshikuni Inokawa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masahiko Ando
- Data Coordinating Center, Department of Advanced Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Nishida
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tomoki Ebata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Najafi M, Gholipour K, Amerzadeh M, Kiaei MZ, Kalhor R. A framework for elderly participation in Primary Health Care in Tabriz Health complexes. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:499. [PMID: 37605154 PMCID: PMC10441748 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04217-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A framework for increasing elderly participation in Primary Health Care (PHC) is a vital issue considering the growing population. After examining the situation and elderly participation in the provision of PHC in the health complexes of Tabriz City, the present study presents the framework of elderly participation in PHC. METHODS This is a mixed-method study. First, we reviewed the models of elderly participation in PHC worldwide using a comprehensive search of literature. Then, we extracted the service providers' and the elderly's views regarding the obstacles and solutions for the elderly participation in PHC in Iran using the interviews and focus group discussions (FGD). We conducted three FGDs (8-10 people) and seven individual interviews. Data were analyzed using the content analysis method. We developed the proposed framework for the participation of the elderly in PHC using a panel of experts and checked and confirmed the framework's validity using the Delphi technique with 11 experts from the content validity index and modified kappa coefficient. RESULTS Based on the result of included studies in the systematic review, the characteristics of the participation models were classified into five areas: the characteristics of the service user, the main facilitator of the intervention, the type of ownership of the center, the subject and the method of participation. The solutions and obstacles, and problems presented by the service providers and users in different areas include 12 themes (elderly participation, home care, and self-care, respect for the elderly, cooperation of different organizations, service package for the elderly, referral system, planning for the elderly, considering insurance for the elderly, the role of informing the elderly, mental health of the elderly, physical space of centers and training of elderly caregivers) and 46 sub-themes. The final framework also includes five themes (approaches and strategies to attract participation, indicators, and consequences of participation of the elderly, implementation strategies of elderly care, implementation infrastructure and goals and areas of participation of the elderly) and sub-themes. CONCLUSION The results of the study indicate that the final framework obtained should be used based on a systematic model for elderly participation in PHC and should be implemented and followed up based on local strategies and specific indicators, considering all capacities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdieh Najafi
- Student Research Committee, School of Public Health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| | - Kamal Gholipour
- Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amerzadeh
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| | - Mohammad Zakaria Kiaei
- Health Services Management, School of Public Health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| | - Rohollah Kalhor
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A Pedometer-Based Physically Active Learning Intervention: The Importance of Using Preintervention Physical Activity Categories to Assess Effectiveness. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2019; 31:356-362. [PMID: 30612529 DOI: 10.1123/pes.2018-0128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess physical activity outcomes of a pedometer-based physically active learning (PAL) intervention in primary school children. METHODS Six paired schools were randomly allocated to either a 6-week teacher-led pedometer-based physically active learning intervention or a control (n = 154, female = 60%, age = 9.9 [0.3] y). Accelerometers assessed total daily sedentary time, light physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Preintervention mean daily MVPA minutes grouped participants as Low Active (<45 min/d) and High Active (≥45 min/d). RESULTS From the final sample size, the intervention (n = 52) significantly improved LPA versus control (n = 31, P = .04), by reducing sedentary time. More intervention (+10%) than control (+3%) pupils met the 60 minutes per day guidelines. In both intervention subgroups, pupils spent less time in LPA (P < .05) versus control. The greatest nonsignificant increase was found in the Low Active pupils MVPA levels. CONCLUSIONS Improvements in LPA were statistically significant in the intervention versus control group. In subgroup analysis, Low Active pupils in the intervention showed the greatest beneficial effects and the Most Active pupils may have replaced MVPA and sedentary time with LPA. The intervention group housed clusters of pupils showing variable responsiveness, justifying routine examination of subgroup variability in future studies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Harris T, Limb ES, Hosking F, Carey I, DeWilde S, Furness C, Wahlich C, Ahmad S, Kerry S, Whincup P, Victor C, Ussher M, Iliffe S, Ekelund U, Fox-Rushby J, Ibison J, Cook DG. Effect of pedometer-based walking interventions on long-term health outcomes: Prospective 4-year follow-up of two randomised controlled trials using routine primary care data. PLoS Med 2019; 16:e1002836. [PMID: 31237875 PMCID: PMC6592516 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data are lacking from physical activity (PA) trials with long-term follow-up of both objectively measured PA levels and robust health outcomes. Two primary care 12-week pedometer-based walking interventions in adults and older adults (PACE-UP and PACE-Lift) found sustained objectively measured PA increases at 3 and 4 years, respectively. We aimed to evaluate trial intervention effects on long-term health outcomes relevant to walking interventions, using routine primary care data. METHODS AND FINDINGS Randomisation was from October 2012 to November 2013 for PACE-UP participants from seven general (family) practices and October 2011 to October 2012 for PACE-Lift participants from three practices. We downloaded primary care data, masked to intervention or control status, for 1,001 PACE-UP participants aged 45-75 years, 36% (361) male, and 296 PACE-Lift participants, aged 60-75 years, 46% (138) male, who gave written informed consent, for 4-year periods following randomisation. The following new events were counted for all participants, including those with preexisting diseases (apart from diabetes, for which existing cases were excluded): nonfatal cardiovascular, total cardiovascular (including fatal), incident diabetes, depression, fractures, and falls. Intervention effects on time to first event post-randomisation were modelled using Cox regression for all outcomes, except for falls, which used negative binomial regression to allow for multiple events, adjusting for age, sex, and study. Absolute risk reductions (ARRs) and numbers needed to treat (NNTs) were estimated. Data were downloaded for 1,297 (98%) of 1,321 trial participants. Event rates were low (<20 per group) for outcomes, apart from fractures and falls. Cox hazard ratios for time to first event post-randomisation for interventions versus controls were nonfatal cardiovascular 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07-0.77, p = 0.02), total cardiovascular 0.34 (95% CI 0.12-0.91, p = 0.03), diabetes 0.75 (95% CI 0.42-1.36, p = 0.34), depression 0.98 (95% CI 0.46-2.07, p = 0.96), and fractures 0.56 (95% CI 0.35-0.90, p = 0.02). Negative binomial incident rate ratio for falls was 1.07 (95% CI 0.78-1.46, p = 0.67). ARR and NNT for cardiovascular events were nonfatal 1.7% (95% CI 0.5%-2.1%), NNT = 59 (95% CI 48-194); total 1.6% (95% CI 0.2%-2.2%), NNT = 61 (95% CI 46-472); and for fractures 3.6% (95% CI 0.8%-5.4%), NNT = 28 (95% CI 19-125). Main limitations were that event rates were low and only events recorded in primary care records were counted; however, any underrecording would not have differed by intervention status and so should not have led to bias. CONCLUSIONS Routine primary care data used to assess long-term trial outcomes demonstrated significantly fewer new cardiovascular events and fractures in intervention participants at 4 years. No statistically significant differences between intervention and control groups were demonstrated for other events. Short-term primary care pedometer-based walking interventions can produce long-term health benefits and should be more widely used to help address the public health inactivity challenge. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS PACE-UP isrctn.com ISRCTN98538934; PACE-Lift isrctn.com ISRCTN42122561.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess Harris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth S. Limb
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Fay Hosking
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Iain Carey
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steve DeWilde
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cheryl Furness
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Wahlich
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shaleen Ahmad
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sally Kerry
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Whincup
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina Victor
- Gerontology and Health Services Research Unit, Brunel University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
- Institute for Social Marketing and Public Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Steve Iliffe
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ulf Ekelund
- Department of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Julia Fox-Rushby
- Department of Population Science, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Ibison
- Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St George’s University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Derek G. Cook
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harris T, Kerry S, Victor C, Iliffe S, Ussher M, Fox-Rushby J, Whincup P, Ekelund U, Furness C, Limb E, Anokye N, Ibison J, DeWilde S, David L, Howard E, Dale R, Smith J, Normansell R, Beighton C, Morgan K, Wahlich C, Sanghera S, Cook D. A pedometer-based walking intervention in 45- to 75-year-olds, with and without practice nurse support: the PACE-UP three-arm cluster RCT. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-274. [PMID: 29961442 DOI: 10.3310/hta22370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines recommend walking to increase moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) for health benefits. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of a pedometer-based walking intervention in inactive adults, delivered postally or through dedicated practice nurse physical activity (PA) consultations. DESIGN Parallel three-arm trial, cluster randomised by household. SETTING Seven London-based general practices. PARTICIPANTS A total of 11,015 people without PA contraindications, aged 45-75 years, randomly selected from practices, were invited. A total of 6399 people were non-responders, and 548 people self-reporting achieving PA guidelines were excluded. A total of 1023 people from 922 households were randomised to usual care (n = 338), postal intervention (n = 339) or nurse support (n = 346). The recruitment rate was 10% (1023/10,467). A total of 956 participants (93%) provided outcome data. INTERVENTIONS Intervention groups received pedometers, 12-week walking programmes advising participants to gradually add '3000 steps in 30 minutes' most days weekly and PA diaries. The nurse group was offered three dedicated PA consultations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary and main secondary outcomes were changes from baseline to 12 months in average daily step counts and time in MVPA (in ≥ 10-minute bouts), respectively, from 7-day accelerometry. Individual resource-use data informed the within-trial economic evaluation and the Markov model for simulating long-term cost-effectiveness. Qualitative evaluations assessed nurse and participant views. A 3-year follow-up was conducted. RESULTS Baseline average daily step count was 7479 [standard deviation (SD) 2671], average minutes per week in MVPA bouts was 94 minutes (SD 102 minutes) for those randomised. PA increased significantly at 12 months in both intervention groups compared with the control group, with no difference between interventions; additional steps per day were 642 steps [95% confidence interval (CI) 329 to 955 steps] for the postal group and 677 steps (95% CI 365 to 989 steps) for nurse support, and additional MVPA in bouts (minutes per week) was 33 minutes per week (95% CI 17 to 49 minutes per week) for the postal group and 35 minutes per week (95% CI 19 to 51 minutes per week) for nurse support. Intervention groups showed no increase in adverse events. Incremental cost per step was 19p and £3.61 per minute in a ≥ 10-minute MVPA bout for nurse support, whereas the postal group took more steps and cost less than the control group. The postal group had a 50% chance of being cost-effective at a £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) threshold within 1 year and had both lower costs [-£11M (95% CI -£12M to -£10M) per 100,000 population] and more QALYs [759 QALYs gained (95% CI 400 to 1247 QALYs)] than the nurse support and control groups in the long term. Participants and nurses found the interventions acceptable and enjoyable. Three-year follow-up data showed persistent intervention effects (nurse support plus postal vs. control) on steps per day [648 steps (95% CI 272 to 1024 steps)] and MVPA bouts [26 minutes per week (95% CI 8 to 44 minutes per week)]. LIMITATIONS The 10% recruitment level, with lower levels in Asian and socioeconomically deprived participants, limits the generalisability of the findings. Assessors were unmasked to the group. CONCLUSIONS A primary care pedometer-based walking intervention in 45- to 75-year-olds increased 12-month step counts by around one-tenth, and time in MVPA bouts by around one-third, with similar effects for the nurse support and postal groups, and persistent 3-year effects. The postal intervention provides cost-effective, long-term quality-of-life benefits. A primary care pedometer intervention delivered by post could help address the public health physical inactivity challenge. FUTURE WORK Exploring different recruitment strategies to increase uptake. Integrating the Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation-UP (PACE-UP) trial with evolving PA monitoring technologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN98538934. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 37. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess Harris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Sally Kerry
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Christina Victor
- Gerontology and Health Services Research Unit, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Steve Iliffe
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Julia Fox-Rushby
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Peter Whincup
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Ulf Ekelund
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.,Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cheryl Furness
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Limb
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Nana Anokye
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Judith Ibison
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Stephen DeWilde
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Lee David
- 10 Minute CBT, Devonshire Business Centre, Letchworth Garden City, UK
| | - Emma Howard
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Dale
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Jaime Smith
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Normansell
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Carole Beighton
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Katy Morgan
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Wahlich
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Sabina Sanghera
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Derek Cook
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grindell C, Mawson S, Gerrish K, Parker S, Bissell P. Exploring the acceptability and usability of a novel social innovation to encourage physical activity: The iStep prototype. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2019; 27:383-391. [PMID: 30255638 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
This study explored the acceptability and usability of the iStep prototype a novel social innovation to encourage intergenerational physical activity (PA) to help reduce obesity levels in older age. Obesity is a major public health issue and physical inactivity is one of the many factors that influence this, especially in childhood and later life. iStep (a pedometer and interactive website) sought to increase PA levels across the life course through intergenerational partnerships participating in walking challenges together. This was a qualitative mixed methods study involving 130 participants from two different settings. Pupils and teachers from a local secondary school (n = 120) tested the iStep prototype over two separate 2-week periods. Pupil and teacher partnerships engaged in a walking challenge using pedometers and the website platform. In addition, 10 retirement age women were involved in a modified co-operative evaluation of the prototype. Two focus groups with pupils (n = 9 and 20), semistructured interviews with teachers (n = 5), and one dyadic interview (pupil/teacher) were undertaken. Data were analysed using an iterative thematic approach. Five themes were identified: perceptions of the technology, attitudes towards the walking challenge, attitudes to the intergenerational partnership, competition versus collaboration and promoting PA. The pedometer was a useful motivational tool which raised awareness of PA levels. The website was thought to be simple and easy to use. Walking was deemed inclusive and accessible to all age groups and setting a target goal was considered beneficial. Engaging in PA with a partner was regarded as a good way to provide support and encouragement. Overall, this early prototype evaluation showed that iStep has potential to be an innovative and engaging way to encourage increased PA across generations. It may positively contribute towards reducing obesity levels in older age but outcomes that effectively measure this need to be incorporated in any future iStep testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sue Mawson
- Section HSR, ScHARR, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kate Gerrish
- University of Sheffield/Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT, Sheffield, UK
| | - Stuart Parker
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paul Bissell
- Dean of the School of Human and Health Sciences, Huddersfield University, Huddersfield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Measuring change in trials of physical activity interventions: a comparison of self-report questionnaire and accelerometry within the PACE-UP trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2019; 16:10. [PMID: 30670036 PMCID: PMC6341662 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-018-0762-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Few trials have compared estimates of change in physical activity (PA) levels using self-reported and objective PA measures when evaluating trial outcomes. The PACE-UP trial offered the opportunity to assess this, using the self-administered International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and waist-worn accelerometry. Methods The PACE-UP trial (N = 1023) compared usual care (n = 338) with two pedometer-based walking interventions, by post (n = 339) or with nurse support (n = 346). Participants wore an accelerometer at baseline and 12 months and completed IPAQ for the same 7-day periods. Main outcomes were weekly minutes, all in ≥10 min bouts as per UK PA guidelines of: i) accelerometer moderate-to-vigorous PA (Acc-MVPA) ii) IPAQ moderate+vigorous PA (IPAQ-MVPA) and iii) IPAQ walking (IPAQ-Walk). For each outcome, 12 month values were regressed on baseline to estimate change. Results Analyses were restricted to 655 (64%) participants who provided data on all outcomes at baseline and 12 months. Both intervention groups significantly increased their accelerometry MVPA minutes/week compared with control: postal group 42 (95% CI 22, 61), nurse group 43 (95% CI 24, 63). IPAQ-Walk minutes/week also increased: postal 57 (95% CI 2, 112), nurse 43 (95% CI -11, 97) but IPAQ-MVPA minutes/week showed non-significant decreases: postal -11 (95% CI -65, 42), nurse -34 (95% CI -87, 19). Conclusions Our results demonstrate the necessity of using a questionnaire focussing on the activities being altered, as with IPAQ-Walk questions. Even then, the change in PA was estimated with far less precision than with accelerometry. Accelerometry is preferred to self-report measurement, minimising bias and improving precision when assessing effects of a walking intervention. Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN98538934. Registered 2 March 2012.
Collapse
|
8
|
Anokye N, Fox-Rushby J, Sanghera S, Cook DG, Limb E, Furness C, Kerry SM, Victor CR, Iliffe S, Ussher M, Whincup PH, Ekelund U, deWilde S, Harris T. Short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based exercise intervention in primary care: a within-trial analysis and beyond-trial modelling. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021978. [PMID: 30337309 PMCID: PMC6196874 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of two pedometer-based walking interventions compared with usual care. DESIGN (A) Short-term CEA: parallel three-arm cluster randomised trial randomised by household. (B) Long-term CEA: Markov decision model. SETTING Seven primary care practices in South London, UK. PARTICIPANTS (A) Short-term CEA: 1023 people (922 households) aged 45-75 years without physical activity (PA) contraindications. (b) Long-term CEA: a cohort of 100 000 people aged 59-88 years. INTERVENTIONS Pedometers, 12-week walking programmes and PA diaries delivered by post or through three PA consultations with practice nurses. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Accelerometer-measured change (baseline to 12 months) in average daily step count and time in 10 min bouts of moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA), and EQ-5D-5L quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). METHODS Resource use costs (£2013/2014) from a National Health Service perspective, presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for each outcome over a 1-year and lifetime horizon, with cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and willingness to pay per QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluate uncertainty. RESULTS (A) Short-term CEA: At 12 months, incremental cost was £3.61 (£109)/min in ≥10 min MVPA bouts for nurse support compared with control (postal group). At £20 000/QALY, the postal group had a 50% chance of being cost saving compared with control. (B) Long-term CEA: The postal group had more QALYs (+759 QALYs, 95% CI 400 to 1247) and lower costs (-£11 million, 95% CI -12 to -10) than control and nurse groups, resulting in an incremental net monetary benefit of £26 million per 100 000 population. Results were sensitive to reporting serious adverse events, excluding health service use, and including all participant costs. CONCLUSIONS Postal delivery of a pedometer intervention in primary care is cost-effective long term and has a 50% chance of being cost-effective, through resource savings, within 1 year. Further research should ascertain maintenance of the higher levels of PA, and its impact on quality of life and health service use. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN98538934; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nana Anokye
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, London, UK
| | - Julia Fox-Rushby
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Guy’s Campus, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sabina Sanghera
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Derek G Cook
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Limb
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Cheryl Furness
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Steve Iliffe
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Peter H Whincup
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Ulf Ekelund
- Department of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephen deWilde
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Tess Harris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Harris T, Kerry SM, Limb ES, Furness C, Wahlich C, Victor CR, Iliffe S, Whincup PH, Ussher M, Ekelund U, Fox-Rushby J, Ibison J, DeWilde S, McKay C, Cook DG. Physical activity levels in adults and older adults 3-4 years after pedometer-based walking interventions: Long-term follow-up of participants from two randomised controlled trials in UK primary care. PLoS Med 2018; 15:e1002526. [PMID: 29522529 PMCID: PMC5844512 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical inactivity is an important cause of noncommunicable diseases. Interventions can increase short-term physical activity (PA), but health benefits require maintenance. Few interventions have evaluated PA objectively beyond 12 months. We followed up two pedometer interventions with positive 12-month effects to examine objective PA levels at 3-4 years. METHODS AND FINDINGS Long-term follow-up of two completed trials: Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation-UP (PACE-UP) 3-arm (postal, nurse support, control) at 3 years and Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation-Lift (PACE-Lift) 2-arm (nurse support, control) at 4 years post-baseline. Randomly selected patients from 10 United Kingdom primary care practices were recruited (PACE-UP: 45-75 years, PACE-Lift: 60-75 years). Intervention arms received 12-week walking programmes (pedometer, handbooks, PA diaries) postally (PACE-UP) or with nurse support (PACE-UP, PACE-Lift). Main outcomes were changes in 7-day accelerometer average daily step counts and weekly time in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) in ≥10-minute bouts in intervention versus control groups, between baseline and 3 years (PACE-UP) and 4 years (PACE-Lift). PACE-UP 3-year follow-up was 67% (681/1,023) (mean age: 59, 64% female), and PACE-Lift 4-year follow-up was 76% (225/298) (mean age: 67, 53% female). PACE-UP 3-year intervention versus control comparisons were as follows: additional steps/day postal +627 (95% CI: 198-1,056), p = 0.004, nurse +670 (95% CI: 237-1,102), p = 0.002; total weekly MVPA in bouts (minutes/week) postal +28 (95% CI: 7-49), p = 0.009, nurse +24 (95% CI: 3-45), p = 0.03. PACE-Lift 4-year intervention versus control comparisons were: +407 (95% CI: -177-992), p = 0.17 steps/day, and +32 (95% CI: 5-60), p = 0.02 minutes/week MVPA in bouts. Neither trial showed sedentary or wear-time differences. Main study limitation was incomplete follow-up; however, results were robust to missing data sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Intervention participants followed up from both trials demonstrated higher levels of objectively measured PA at 3-4 years than controls, similar to previously reported 12-month trial effects. Pedometer interventions, delivered by post or with nurse support, can help address the public health physical inactivity challenge. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS PACE-UP isrctn.com ISRCTN98538934; PACE-Lift isrctn.com ISRCTN42122561.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess Harris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sally M. Kerry
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth S. Limb
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cheryl Furness
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Wahlich
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina R. Victor
- Gerontology and Health Services Research Unit, Brunel University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steve Iliffe
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter H. Whincup
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ulf Ekelund
- Department of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Fox-Rushby
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Ibison
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen DeWilde
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cathy McKay
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Derek G. Cook
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kerry SM, Morgan KE, Limb E, Cook DG, Furness C, Carey I, DeWilde S, Victor CR, Iliffe S, Whincup P, Ussher M, Ekelund U, Fox-Rushby J, Ibison J, Harris T. Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:170. [PMID: 29361929 PMCID: PMC5781315 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5034-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Failure to include socio-economically deprived or ethnic minority groups in physical activity (PA) trials may limit representativeness and could lead to implementation of interventions that then increase health inequalities. Randomised intervention trials often have low recruitment rates and rarely assess recruitment bias. A previous trial by the same team using similar methods recruited 30% of the eligible population but was in an affluent setting with few non-white residents and was limited to those over 60 years of age. Methods PACE-UP is a large, effective, population-based walking trial in inactive 45-75 year-olds that recruited through seven London general practices. Anonymised practice demographic data were available for all those invited, enabling investigation of inequalities in trial recruitment. Non-participants were invited to complete a questionnaire. Results From 10,927 postal invitations, 1150 (10.5%) completed baseline assessment. Participation rate ratios (95% CI), adjusted for age and gender as appropriate, were lower in men 0.59 (0.52, 0.67) than women, in those under 55 compared with those ≥65, 0.60 (0.51, 0.71), in the most deprived quintile compared with the least deprived 0.52 (0.39, 0.70) and in Asian individuals compared with whites 0.62 (0.50, 0.76). Black individuals were equally likely to participate as white individuals. Participation was also associated with having a co-morbidity or some degree of health limitation. The most common reasons for non-participation were considering themselves as being too active or lack of time. Conclusions Conducting the trial in this diverse setting reduced overall response, with lower response in socio-economically deprived and Asian sub-groups. Trials with greater reach are likely to be more expensive in terms of recruitment and gains in generalizability need to be balanced with greater costs. Differential uptake of successful trial interventions may increase inequalities in PA levels and should be monitored. Trial registration ISRCTN.com ISRCTN98538934. Registered 2nd March 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally M Kerry
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary's University of London, London, SE 1 2AT, UK.
| | - Katy E Morgan
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Elizabeth Limb
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Derek G Cook
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Cheryl Furness
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Iain Carey
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Steve DeWilde
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Christina R Victor
- Gerontology and Health Services Research Unit, Brunel University, London, UB8 3PH, UK
| | - Steve Iliffe
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Peter Whincup
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Ulf Ekelund
- Department of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PO Box 4014, 0806, Oslo, Norway.,MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 OQQ, UK
| | - Julia Fox-Rushby
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Kings College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK
| | - Judith Ibison
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Tess Harris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Relating process evaluation measures to complex intervention outcomes: findings from the PACE-UP primary care pedometer-based walking trial. Trials 2018; 19:58. [PMID: 29357921 PMCID: PMC5778651 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2428-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PACE-UP trial demonstrated positive effects of a pedometer-based walking intervention on objective physical activity (PA) outcomes at three and 12 months in 45-75-year-old primary care patients, in postal and nurse-supported trial arms compared with controls. We explored associations between process evaluation measures and change in PA outcomes. METHODS The MRC framework guided process evaluation. Three quantitative measures (nurse session attendance [dose delivered], PA diary completion [fidelity] and pedometer use [fidelity]) were selected as independent variables in multi-level models estimating intervention effectiveness on PA outcomes (changes in step-counts and time in moderate-to-vigorous PA [MVPA] levels in ≥ 10-min bouts). RESULTS Dose: attending all three nurse sessions compared with 0-2 sessions was associated with an increase in steps/day at three and 12 months of 1197 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 627-1766) and 605 (95% CI = 74-1137), respectively; and MVPA in bouts (min/week) at three and 12 months by 74 (95% CI = 45-103) and 30 (95% CI = 3-57), respectively. Fidelity: postal and nurse groups showed strong positive associations of diary return with steps/day at three months: postal 1458 (95% CI = 854-2061), nurse 873 (95% CI = 190-1555). MVPA in bouts (min/week): postal 64 (95% CI = 33-94), nurse 50 (95% CI = 15-85). At 12 months, only the postal group effects remained statistically significant: steps/day 1114 (95% CI = 538-1689), MVPA 47 (95% CI = 18-75). Regular pedometer use in the postal group only was associated with higher three-month and 12-month steps/day: 1029 (95% CI = 383-1675) and 606 (95% CI = 22-1190), respectively, and with MVPA in bouts at three months: 40 (95% CI = 6-73). CONCLUSION Process evaluation measures demonstrated significant associations with PA outcomes at three and 12 months. We cannot infer causality, but the associations between the process measures and PA outcomes suggest that they were important in enabling the trial changes observed and should be considered core components of the PACE-UP nurse and postal interventions. We have shown the MRC framework to be a useful tool for process evaluation of intervention implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN98538934 . Registered on 2 March 2012.
Collapse
|
12
|
Vílchez Barboza V, Klijn TP, Salazar Molina A, Sáez Carrillo KL. Effectiveness of personalized face-to-face and telephone nursing counseling interventions for cardiovascular risk factors: a controlled clinical trial. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2017; 24:e2747. [PMID: 27508917 PMCID: PMC4990044 DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.0626.2747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2015] [Accepted: 09/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the effect and gender differences of an innovative intervention
involving in-person and telephone nursing counseling to control cardiovascular
risk factors (arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, and overweight), improve
health-related quality of life and strengthen self-efficacy and social support in
persons using the municipal health centers' cardiovascular health program. Method: a randomized controlled clinical trial involving participants randomized into the
intervention group who received traditional consultation plus personalized and
telephone nursing counseling for 7 months (n = 53) and the control group (n = 56).
The study followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Statement. Results: women in the intervention group presented a significant increase in the physical
and mental health components compared to the control group, with decreases in
weight, abdominal circumference, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol, and the atherogenic index. The effects attributable to the
intervention in the men in the intervention group were increased physical and
emotional roles and decreased systolic and diastolic pressure, waist
circumference, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, atherogenic
index, cardiovascular risk factor, and 10-year coronary risk. Conclusion: this intervention is an effective strategy for the control of three
cardiovascular risk factors and the improvement of health-related quality of
life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Vílchez Barboza
- PhD, Professor, Escuela de Enfermería, Universidad de Costa Rica, Montes de Oca, San José
| | - Tatiana Paravic Klijn
- PhD, Full Professor, Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
| | - Alide Salazar Molina
- PhD, Associate Professor, Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
| | - Katia Lorena Sáez Carrillo
- PhD, Associate Professor, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Departamento de Estadística, Universidad de Concepción, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Harris T, Kerry SM, Limb ES, Victor CR, Iliffe S, Ussher M, Whincup PH, Ekelund U, Fox-Rushby J, Furness C, Anokye N, Ibison J, DeWilde S, David L, Howard E, Dale R, Smith J, Cook DG. Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial. PLoS Med 2017; 14:e1002210. [PMID: 28045890 PMCID: PMC5207642 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2016] [Accepted: 11/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pedometers can increase walking and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) levels, but their effectiveness with or without support has not been rigorously evaluated. We assessed the effectiveness of a pedometer-based walking intervention in predominantly inactive adults, delivered by post or through primary care nurse-supported physical activity (PA) consultations. METHODS AND FINDINGS A parallel three-arm cluster randomised trial was randomised by household, with 12-mo follow-up, in seven London, United Kingdom, primary care practices. Eleven thousand fifteen randomly selected patients aged 45-75 y without PA contraindications were invited. Five hundred forty-eight self-reporting achieving PA guidelines were excluded. One thousand twenty-three people from 922 households were randomised between 2012-2013 to one of the following groups: usual care (n = 338); postal pedometer intervention (n = 339); and nurse-supported pedometer intervention (n = 346). Of these, 956 participants (93%) provided outcome data (usual care n = 323, postal n = 312, nurse-supported n = 321). Both intervention groups received pedometers, 12-wk walking programmes, and PA diaries. The nurse group was offered three PA consultations. Primary and main secondary outcomes were changes from baseline to 12 mo in average daily step-counts and time in MVPA (in ≥10-min bouts), respectively, measured objectively by accelerometry. Only statisticians were masked to group. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Average baseline daily step-count was 7,479 (standard deviation [s.d.] 2,671), and average time in MVPA bouts was 94 (s.d. 102) min/wk. At 12 mo, mean steps/d, with s.d. in parentheses, were as follows: control 7,246 (2,671); postal 8,010 (2,922); and nurse support 8,131 (3,228). PA increased in both intervention groups compared with the control group; additional steps/d were 642 for postal (95% CI 329-955) and 677 for nurse support (95% CI 365-989); additional MVPA in bouts (min/wk) were 33 for postal (95% CI 17-49) and 35 for nurse support (95% CI 19-51). There were no significant differences between the two interventions at 12 mo. The 10% (1,023/10,467) recruitment rate was a study limitation. CONCLUSIONS A primary care pedometer-based walking intervention in predominantly inactive 45- to 75-y-olds increased step-counts by about one-tenth and time in MVPA in bouts by about one-third. Nurse and postal delivery achieved similar 12-mo PA outcomes. A primary care pedometer intervention delivered by post or with minimal support could help address the public health physical inactivity challenge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION isrctn.com ISRCTN98538934.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess Harris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sally M. Kerry
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth S. Limb
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina R. Victor
- Gerontology and Health Services Research Unit, Brunel University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steve Iliffe
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter H. Whincup
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ulf Ekelund
- Department of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Fox-Rushby
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cheryl Furness
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nana Anokye
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Ibison
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steve DeWilde
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lee David
- 10 Minute CBT, Devonshire Business Centre, Letchworth Garden City, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Howard
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Dale
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jaime Smith
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Derek G. Cook
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brooks J, Ahmad I, Easton G. Promoting physical activity: the general practice agenda. Br J Gen Pract 2016; 66:454-5. [PMID: 27563115 PMCID: PMC5198680 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16x686689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
|
15
|
Thomson CA, Crane TE, Miller A, Garcia DO, Basen-Engquist K, Alberts DS. A randomized trial of diet and physical activity in women treated for stage II-IV ovarian cancer: Rationale and design of the Lifestyle Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Enhanced Survival (LIVES): An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG-225) Study. Contemp Clin Trials 2016; 49:181-9. [PMID: 27394382 PMCID: PMC5108358 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2016] [Revised: 06/30/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most common cause of gynecological cancer death in United States women. Efforts to improve progression free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QoL) after treatment for ovarian cancer are necessary. Observational studies suggest that lifestyle behaviors, including diet and physical activity, are associated with lower mortality in this population. The Lifestyle Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Enhanced Survival (LIVES) NRG 0225 study is a randomized, controlled trial designed to test the hypothesis that a 24month lifestyle intervention will significantly increase PFS after oncological therapy for stage II-IV ovarian cancer. Women are randomized 1:1 to a high vegetable and fiber, low-fat diet with daily physical activity goals or an attention control group. Secondary outcomes to be evaluated include QoL and gastrointestinal health. Moreover an a priori lifestyle adherence score will be used to evaluate relationships between adoption of the diet and activity goals and PFS. Blood specimens are collected at baseline, 6, 12 and 24months for analysis of dietary adherence (carotenoids) in addition to mechanistic biomarkers (lipids, insulin, telomere length). Women are enrolled at NRG clinic sites nationally and the telephone based lifestyle intervention is delivered from The University of Arizona call center by trained health coaches. A study specific multi-modal telephone, email, and SMS behavior change software platform is utilized for information delivery, coaching and data capture. When completed, LIVES will be the largest behavior-based lifestyle intervention trial conducted among ovarian cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia A Thomson
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., PO Box 245209, Tucson, AZ 85724-5209, United States.
| | - Tracy E Crane
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., PO Box 245209, Tucson, AZ 85724-5209, United States.
| | - Austin Miller
- NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group, Statistics and Data Management Center, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States.
| | - David O Garcia
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., PO Box 245209, Tucson, AZ 85724-5209, United States.
| | - Karen Basen-Engquist
- Department of Behavioral Science, Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, United States.
| | - David S Alberts
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, 1515 N. Campbell Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wijndaele K, Westgate K, Stephens SK, Blair SN, Bull FC, Chastin SFM, Dunstan DW, Ekelund U, Esliger DW, Freedson PS, Granat MH, Matthews CE, Owen N, Rowlands AV, Sherar LB, Tremblay MS, Troiano RP, Brage S, Healy GN. Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016; 47:2129-39. [PMID: 25785929 PMCID: PMC4731236 DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000000661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to describe the scope of accelerometry data collected internationally in adults and to obtain a consensus from measurement experts regarding the optimal strategies to harmonize international accelerometry data. METHODS In March 2014, a comprehensive review was undertaken to identify studies that collected accelerometry data in adults (sample size, n ≥ 400). In addition, 20 physical activity experts were invited to participate in a two-phase Delphi process to obtain consensus on the following: unique research opportunities available with such data, additional data required to address these opportunities, strategies for enabling comparisons between studies/countries, requirements for implementing/progressing such strategies, and value of a global repository of accelerometry data. RESULTS The review identified accelerometry data from more than 275,000 adults from 76 studies across 36 countries. Consensus was achieved after two rounds of the Delphi process; 18 experts participated in one or both rounds. The key opportunities highlighted were the ability for cross-country/cross-population comparisons and the analytic options available with the larger heterogeneity and greater statistical power. Basic sociodemographic and anthropometric data were considered a prerequisite for this. Disclosure of monitor specifications and protocols for data collection and processing were deemed essential to enable comparison and data harmonization. There was strong consensus that standardization of data collection, processing, and analytical procedures was needed. To implement these strategies, communication and consensus among researchers, development of an online infrastructure, and methodological comparison work were required. There was consensus that a global accelerometry data repository would be beneficial and worthwhile. CONCLUSIONS This foundational resource can lead to implementation of key priority areas and identification of future directions in physical activity epidemiology, population monitoring, and burden of disease estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrien Wijndaele
- 1MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UNITED KINGDOM; 2School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Queensland, AUSTRALIA; 3Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC; 4Schools of Earth and Environment and Sports Science Exercise and Health, University of Western Australia, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA; 5School of Health and Life Science, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UNITED KINGDOM; 6Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, AUSTRALIA; 7Department of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, NORWAY; 8National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UNITED KINGDOM; 9School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, AUSTRALIA; 10Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA; 11School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM; 12Nutritional Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; 13The NIHR Leicester-Loughborough Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit, Leicestershire, UNITED KINGDOM; 14Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CANADA; and 15Risk Factor Assessment Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Normansell R, Holmes R, Victor C, Cook DG, Kerry S, Iliffe S, Ussher M, Fox-Rushby J, Whincup P, Harris T. Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings. Trials 2016; 17:178. [PMID: 27039181 PMCID: PMC4818945 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1299-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Trials in primary care to increase physical activity (PA) typically experience poor recruitment rates and may not recruit those with lower PA levels and who are most in need of the intervention. Despite the well-publicised benefits of physical activity, the majority of adults in the UK remain inactive and, therefore, at greater risk of many health problems. Our aim was to investigate the reasons for non-participation in the PACE-UP trial, which is a primary care pedometer-based walking intervention. This is important for successful recruitment and retention in future PA trials and programmes. Method We conducted semi-structured audio-recorded telephone interviews with 30 participants, aged 45–75 years, purposively sampled from those declining participation in the PACE-UP trial. Recruitment continued until data saturation and a demographically balanced sample was achieved. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded and subjected to thematic analysis. Results Interviewees supported walking as suitable exercise for most people in this age group, recognised the importance of this type of research and general practice as an appropriate setting. Key reasons for declining were: the perception of being already ‘too active’; existing medical conditions; work; travel and other commitments. Less frequently cited reasons included reluctance to be randomised, the intervention’s duration, wearing a pedometer, perceived inappropriateness of trial literature and a preference for a different kind of PA or for a group activity. Conclusions Whilst most interviewees perceived themselves to be sufficiently active, an important minority did not participate due to existing medical conditions and other commitments. Recruitment to future PA trials might be improved by tailoring activity to compensate for medical problems, and adapting PA interventions to fit around work and travel commitments. Ensuring that patient-targeted literature is succinct and inclusive and that equipment is user-friendly are also important. Primary care is seen as an appropriate setting for PA trials and programmes. Trial registration ISRCTN98538934.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Normansell
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
| | - Rebecca Holmes
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Christina Victor
- Gerontology and Health Services Research Unit, Brunel University, London, UB8 3PH, UK
| | - Derek G Cook
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Sally Kerry
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AT, UK
| | - Steve Iliffe
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Julia Fox-Rushby
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, London, UB8 3PH, UK
| | - Peter Whincup
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Tess Harris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Beighton C, Victor C, Normansell R, Cook D, Kerry S, Iliffe S, Ussher M, Whincup P, Fox-Rushby J, Woodcock A, Harris T. "It's not just about walking.....it's the practice nurse that makes it work": a qualitative exploration of the views of practice nurses delivering complex physical activity interventions in primary care. BMC Public Health 2015; 15:1236. [PMID: 26654223 PMCID: PMC4677041 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2568-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2015] [Accepted: 12/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Physical activity (PA) is important for physical and mental health in adults and older adults. Interventions incorporating theory-based behaviour change techniques (BCTs) can be useful in helping people to increase their PA levels and can be delivered by practice nurses in primary care. We undertook two primary care based complex walking interventions among adults and older adults. Both interventions were underpinned by BCTs and delivered by practice nurses and we sought their views and experiences of delivering over 1400 complex PA consultations. Methods Semi structured interviews with two practice nurse groups (n = 4 and n = 5) and two individual interviews (total n = 11) were conducted by independent facilitators; audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Results Five key themes emerged as enablers and/or barriers to delivering the intervention: preparation and training; initial and ongoing support; adherence to the protocol; the use of materials and equipment; and engagement of participants. The themes were organised into a framework of ‘pre-trial’ and ‘delivery of the intervention’. Two additional ‘post-trial’ themes were identified; changed practice and the future feasibility of the intervention. Nurses believed that taking part in the trial, especially the BCT training, enhanced the quality and delivery of advice and support they provided within routine consultations, although the lack of time available routinely makes this challenging. Conclusion Delivering an effective behaviour change intervention in primary care requires adequate training and support for practice nurses both initially and throughout the trial as well as adequate consultation time. Enhanced skills from participating in such trials can lead to long-term changes, including more patient-centred consulting. Trial registration PACE-Lift ISRCTN 42122561, PACE-UP ISRCTN 98538934.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Beighton
- Faculty of Health, Social Care & Education, Kingston & St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
| | - Christina Victor
- College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, UK.
| | - Rebecca Normansell
- Population Health Research Institute, St Georges University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
| | - Derek Cook
- Population Health Research Institute, St Georges University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
| | - Sally Kerry
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary's University of London, London, E1 2AT, UK.
| | - Steve Iliffe
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St Georges University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
| | - Peter Whincup
- Population Health Research Institute, St Georges University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
| | - Julia Fox-Rushby
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK.
| | - Alison Woodcock
- Independent Psychology Research Consultant, Southampton, UK.
| | - Tess Harris
- Population Health Research Institute, St Georges University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mansfield L, Anokye N, Fox-Rushby J, Kay T. The Health and Sport Engagement (HASE) Intervention and Evaluation Project: protocol for the design, outcome, process and economic evaluation of a complex community sport intervention to increase levels of physical activity. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e009276. [PMID: 26503393 PMCID: PMC4636674 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Revised: 09/16/2015] [Accepted: 10/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sport is being promoted to raise population levels of physical activity for health. National sport participation policy focuses on complex community provision tailored to diverse local users. Few quality research studies exist that examine the role of community sport interventions in raising physical activity levels and no research to date has examined the costs and cost-effectiveness of such provision. This study is a protocol for the design, outcome, process and economic evaluation of a complex community sport intervention to increase levels of physical activity, the Health and Sport Engagement (HASE) project part of the national Get Healthy Get Active programme led by Sport England. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The HASE study is a collaborative partnership between local community sport deliverers and sport and public health researchers. It involves designing, delivering and evaluating community sport interventions. The aim is to engage previously inactive people in sustained sporting activity for 1×30 min a week and to examine associated health and well-being outcomes. The study uses mixed methods. Outcomes (physical activity, health, well-being costs to individuals) will be measured by a series of self-report questionnaires and attendance data and evaluated using interrupted time series analysis controlling for a range of sociodemographic factors. Resource use will be identified and measured using diaries, interviews and records and presented alongside effectiveness data as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. A longitudinal process evaluation (focus groups, structured observations, in-depth interview methods) will examine the efficacy of the project for achieving its aim using the principles of thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, academic conference presentations, Sport England and national public health organisation policy conferences, and practice-based case studies. Ethical approval was obtained through Brunel University London's research ethics committee (reference number RE33-12).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Mansfield
- Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Nana Anokye
- Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Julia Fox-Rushby
- Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Tess Kay
- Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Garvey SM, Russ DW, Skelding MB, Dugle JE, Edens NK. Molecular and metabolomic effects of voluntary running wheel activity on skeletal muscle in late middle-aged rats. Physiol Rep 2015; 3:3/2/e12319. [PMID: 25716928 PMCID: PMC4393218 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We examined the molecular and metabolomic effects of voluntary running wheel activity in late middle-aged male Sprague Dawley rats (16–17 months). Rats were assigned either continuous voluntary running wheel access for 8 weeks (RW+) or cage-matched without running wheel access (RW−). The 9 RW+ rats averaged 83 m/day (range: 8–163 m), yet exhibited both 84% reduced individual body weight gain (4.3 g vs. 26.3 g, P = 0.02) and 6.5% reduced individual average daily food intake (20.6 g vs. 22.0 g, P = 0.09) over the 8 weeks. Hindlimb muscles were harvested following an overnight fast. Muscle weights and myofiber cross-sectional area showed no difference between groups. Western blots of gastrocnemius muscle lysates with a panel of antibodies suggest that running wheel activity improved oxidative metabolism (53% increase in PGC1α, P = 0.03), increased autophagy (36% increase in LC3B-II/-I ratio, P = 0.03), and modulated growth signaling (26% increase in myostatin, P = 0.04). RW+ muscle also showed 43% increased glycogen phosphorylase expression (P = 0.04) and 45% increased glycogen content (P = 0.04). Metabolomic profiling of plantaris and soleus muscles indicated that even low-volume voluntary running wheel activity is associated with decreases in many long-chain fatty acids (e.g., palmitoleate, myristoleate, and eicosatrienoate) relative to RW− rats. Relative increases in acylcarnitines and acyl glycerophospholipids were also observed in RW+ plantaris. These data establish that even modest amounts of physical activity during late middle-age promote extensive metabolic remodeling of skeletal muscle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David W Russ
- Division of Physical Therapy, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA Ohio Musculoskeletal & Neurological Institute (OMNI), Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Normansell R, Smith J, Victor C, Cook DG, Kerry S, Iliffe S, Ussher M, Fox-Rushby J, Whincup P, Harris T. Numbers are not the whole story: a qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators to increased physical activity in a primary care based walking intervention. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:1272. [PMID: 25511452 PMCID: PMC4320609 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2014] [Accepted: 12/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The majority of mid-life and older adults in the UK are not achieving recommended physical activity levels and inactivity is associated with many health problems. Walking is a safe, appropriate exercise. The PACE-UP trial sought to increase walking through the structured use of a pedometer and handbook, with and without support from a practice nurse trained in behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Understanding barriers and facilitators to engagement with a primary care based physical activity intervention is essential for future trials and programmes. Methods We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews using a topic guide with purposive samples of participants who did and did not increase their walking from both intervention groups. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and coded independently by researchers prior to performing a thematic analysis. Responsiveness to the specific BCTs used was also analysed. Results Forty-three trial participants were interviewed in early 2014. Almost all felt they had benefitted, irrespective of their change in step-count, and that primary care was an appropriate setting. Important facilitators included a desire for a healthy lifestyle, improved physical health, enjoyment of walking in the local environment, having a flexible routine allowing for an increase in walking, appropriate self and external monitoring and support from others. Important barriers included physical health problems, an inflexible routine, work and other commitments, the weather and a mistrust of the monitoring equipment. BCTs that were reported to have the most impact included: providing information about behaviour-health link; prompting self-monitoring and review of goals and outcomes; providing feedback; providing specific information about how to increase walking; planning social support/change; and relapse prevention. Rewards were unhelpful. Conclusions Despite our expectation that there would be a difference between the experiences of those who did and did not objectively increase their walking, we found that most participants considered themselves to have succeeded in the trial and benefitted from taking part. Barriers and facilitators were similar across demographic groups and trial outcomes. Findings indicated several BCTs on which PA trial and programme planners could focus efforts with the expectation of greatest impact as well as strong support for primary care as an appropriate venue. Trial registration ISRCTN98538934.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christina Victor
- Gerontology and Health Services Research Unit, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University, London UB8 3PH, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee H, Kane I, Brar J, Sereika S. Telephone-delivered physical activity intervention for individuals with serious mental illness: a feasibility study. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc 2014; 20:389-97. [PMID: 25421781 DOI: 10.1177/1078390314561497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is prevalent in individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of a telephone-delivered physical activity (PA) intervention for outpatients with serious mental illness to maintain PA and to explore the preliminary efficacy of the intervention on health status. DESIGN This study used a randomized experimental design. The treatment group received pedometers and eight weekly phone calls; the control group received written information regarding PA. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze data collected at baseline and 8 weeks. RESULTS Twenty-two subjects with SMI (mean age = 44.09 ± 7.6 years; 54.5% were male) were recruited and 16 subjects completed the study in 8 weeks. PA (z = -2.37, p = .02) increased in the treatment group (n = 8) whereas the control group (n = 8) maintained baseline PA level (z = -1.61, p = .11). Health outcomes were not changed (ps > .05). CONCLUSION Telephone-delivered intervention is feasible and has the potential to improve PA in individuals with SMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heeyoung Lee
- Heeyoung Lee, PhD, PMHNP-BC, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Irene Kane
- Irene Kane, PhD, RN, CNAA, HFI, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jaspreet Brar
- Jaspreet Brar, MD, PhD, MPH, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Western Psychiatric Institute & Clinic, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Susan Sereika
- Susan Sereika, PhD, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|