1
|
Kozlowski P. Thirty Years with ERH: An mRNA Splicing and Mitosis Factor Only or Rather a Novel Genome Integrity Protector? Cells 2023; 12:2449. [PMID: 37887293 PMCID: PMC10605862 DOI: 10.3390/cells12202449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
ERH is a 100 to about 110 aa nuclear protein with unique primary and three-dimensional structures that are very conserved from simple eukaryotes to humans, albeit some species have lost its gene, with most higher fungi being a noteworthy example. Initially, studies on Drosophila melanogaster implied its function in pyrimidine metabolism. Subsequently, research on Xenopus laevis suggested that it acts as a transcriptional repressor. Finally, studies in humans pointed to a role in pre-mRNA splicing and in mitosis but further research, also in Caenorhabditis elegans and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, demonstrated its much broader activity, namely involvement in the biogenesis of mRNA, and miRNA, piRNA and some other ncRNAs, and in repressive heterochromatin formation. ERH interacts with numerous, mostly taxon-specific proteins, like Mmi1 and Mei2 in S. pombe, PID-3/PICS-1, TOST-1 and PID-1 in C. elegans, and DGCR8, CIZ1, PDIP46/SKAR and SAFB1/2 in humans. There are, however, some common themes in this wide range of processes and partners, such as: (a) ERH homodimerizes to form a scaffold for several complexes involved in the metabolism of nucleic acids, (b) all these RNAs are RNA polymerase II transcripts, (c) pre-mRNAs, whose splicing depends on ERH, are enriched in transcripts of DNA damage response and DNA metabolism genes, and (d) heterochromatin is formed to silence unwanted transcription, e.g., from repetitive elements. Thus, it seems that ERH has been adopted for various pathways that serve to maintain genome integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Kozlowski
- Department of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1, 02-096 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salas-Leiva DE, Tromer EC, Curtis BA, Jerlström-Hultqvist J, Kolisko M, Yi Z, Salas-Leiva JS, Gallot-Lavallée L, Williams SK, Kops GJPL, Archibald JM, Simpson AGB, Roger AJ. Genomic analysis finds no evidence of canonical eukaryotic DNA processing complexes in a free-living protist. Nat Commun 2021; 12:6003. [PMID: 34650064 PMCID: PMC8516963 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26077-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cells replicate and segregate their DNA with precision. Previous studies showed that these regulated cell-cycle processes were present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor and that their core molecular parts are conserved across eukaryotes. However, some metamonad parasites have secondarily lost components of the DNA processing and segregation apparatuses. To clarify the evolutionary history of these systems in these unusual eukaryotes, we generated a genome assembly for the free-living metamonad Carpediemonas membranifera and carried out a comparative genomics analysis. Here, we show that parasitic and free-living metamonads harbor an incomplete set of proteins for processing and segregating DNA. Unexpectedly, Carpediemonas species are further streamlined, lacking the origin recognition complex, Cdc6 and most structural kinetochore subunits. Carpediemonas species are thus the first known eukaryotes that appear to lack this suite of conserved complexes, suggesting that they likely rely on yet-to-be-discovered or alternative mechanisms to carry out these fundamental processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dayana E. Salas-Leiva
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Institute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2 Canada ,grid.5335.00000000121885934Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Eelco C. Tromer
- grid.5335.00000000121885934Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom ,grid.4830.f0000 0004 0407 1981Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Bruce A. Curtis
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Institute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2 Canada
| | - Jon Jerlström-Hultqvist
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Institute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2 Canada
| | - Martin Kolisko
- grid.418095.10000 0001 1015 3316Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Acad. Sci, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | - Zhenzhen Yi
- grid.263785.d0000 0004 0368 7397Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631 China
| | - Joan S. Salas-Leiva
- grid.466575.30000 0001 1835 194XCONACyT-Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados, Departamento de medio ambiente y energía, Miguel de Cervantes 120, Complejo Industrial Chihuahua, 31136 Chihuahua, Chih. México
| | - Lucie Gallot-Lavallée
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Institute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2 Canada
| | - Shelby K. Williams
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Institute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2 Canada
| | - Geert J. P. L. Kops
- grid.7692.a0000000090126352Oncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute – KNAW (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - John M. Archibald
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Institute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2 Canada
| | - Alastair G. B. Simpson
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Institute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2 Canada
| | - Andrew J. Roger
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Institute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hazeslip L, Zafar MK, Chauhan MZ, Byrd AK. Genome Maintenance by DNA Helicase B. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:E578. [PMID: 32455610 PMCID: PMC7290933 DOI: 10.3390/genes11050578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA Helicase B (HELB) is a conserved helicase in higher eukaryotes with roles in the initiation of DNA replication and in the DNA damage and replication stress responses. HELB is a predominately nuclear protein in G1 phase where it is involved in initiation of DNA replication through interactions with DNA topoisomerase 2-binding protein 1 (TOPBP1), cell division control protein 45 (CDC45), and DNA polymerase α-primase. HELB also inhibits homologous recombination by reducing long-range end resection. After phosphorylation by cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) at the G1 to S transition, HELB is predominately localized to the cytosol. However, this cytosolic localization in S phase is not exclusive. HELB has been reported to localize to chromatin in response to replication stress and to localize to the common fragile sites 16D (FRA16D) and 3B (FRA3B) and the rare fragile site XA (FRAXA) in S phase. In addition, HELB is phosphorylated in response to ionizing radiation and has been shown to localize to chromatin in response to various types of DNA damage, suggesting it has a role in the DNA damage response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Hazeslip
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA; (L.H.); (M.K.Z.); (M.Z.C.)
| | - Maroof Khan Zafar
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA; (L.H.); (M.K.Z.); (M.Z.C.)
| | - Muhammad Zain Chauhan
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA; (L.H.); (M.K.Z.); (M.Z.C.)
| | - Alicia K. Byrd
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA; (L.H.); (M.K.Z.); (M.Z.C.)
- Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The Replicative Consequences of Papillomavirus E2 Protein Binding to the Origin Replication Factor ORC2. PLoS Pathog 2016; 12:e1005934. [PMID: 27701460 PMCID: PMC5049798 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2016] [Accepted: 09/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The origin recognition complex (ORC) coordinates a series of events that lead to initiation of DNA strand duplication. As a nuclear double stranded DNA plasmid, the papillomavirus (PV) genome resembles a mini-chromosome in infected cells. To initiate its replication, the viral E2 protein binds to and recruits the E1 DNA helicase at the viral origin. PV genome replication program exhibits three stages: initial amplification from a single genome upon infection to a few copies per cell, a cell cycle linked maintenance phase, and a differentiation dependent late stage where the genome is amplified to thousands of copies. Involvement of ORC or other pre-replication complex (pre-RC) factors has not been described. We report that human PV (HPV) and bovine PV (BPV-1) E2 proteins bind to ORC2, however, ORC2 was not detected at the viral origin. Depletion of ORC2 enhanced PV replication in a transient replication model and in keratinocytes stably maintaining viral episomes, while there was no effect on copy number in a cell line with integrated HPV genomes. Consistent with this, occupancy of E1 and E2 at the viral origin increased following ORC2 silencing. These data imply that ORC2 is not necessary for activation of the PV origin by E1 and E2 but instead suppresses E2 replicative function. Furthermore, we observed that over-expression of HPV E2 decreased ORC2 occupation at two known mammalian origins of replication, suggesting that E2 restricts pre-ORC assembly that could otherwise compete for host replication complexes necessary for viral genome amplification. We infer that the ORC2 complex with E2 restricts viral replication in the maintenance phase of the viral replication program and that elevated levels of E2 that occur during the differentiation dependent amplification stage subvert ORC loading and hence DNA synthesis at cellular origins. Papillomavirus genome replication occurs during three distinct stages that are linked to the differentiation state of the infected epithelium. The viral proteins E1 and E2 recognize the viral origin and initiate a process that attracts host DNA replication factors. The origin recognition complex (ORC) coordinates initiation of chromosome duplication. While ORC2 binds to the E2 protein, its depletion does not impair PV genome replication. Instead, depletion of ORC2 stimulates viral replication, while over-expression of E2 protein decreases ORC2 occupancy at mammalian origins. We propose that the relative abundance of E2 and ORC2 in complex regulates viral and cellular origin licensing.
Collapse
|
5
|
Musiałek MW, Rybaczek D. Behavior of replication origins in Eukaryota - spatio-temporal dynamics of licensing and firing. Cell Cycle 2015; 14:2251-64. [PMID: 26030591 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1056421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Although every organism shares some common features of replication, this process varies greatly among eukaryotic species. Current data show that mathematical models of the organization of origins based on possibility theory may be applied (and remain accurate) in every model organism i.e. from yeast to humans. The major differences lie within the dynamics of origin firing and the regulation mechanisms that have evolved to meet new challenges throughout the evolution of the organism. This article elaborates on the relations between chromatin structure, organization of origins, their firing times and the impact that these features can have on genome stability, showing both differences and parallels inside the eukaryotic domain.
Collapse
Key Words
- APC, anaphase promoting complex
- ARS, autonomously replicating sequences
- ATR, ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related kinase
- C-Frag, chromosome fragmentation
- CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase
- CDT, C-terminus domain
- CEN, centromere
- CFSs, chromosome fragile sites
- CIN, chromosome instability
- CMG, Cdc45-MCM-GINS complex
- Cdc45, cell division control protein 45
- Cdc6, cell division control protein 6
- Cdt1, chromatin licensing and DNA replication factor 1
- Chk1, checkpoint kinase 1
- Clb2, G2/mitotic-specific cyclin Clb2
- DCR, Ddb1-Cu14a-Roc1 complex
- DDK, Dbf-4-dependent kinase
- DSBs, double strand breaks
- Dbf4, protein Dbf4 homolog A
- Dfp1, Hsk1-Dfp1 kinase complex regulatory subunit Dfp1
- Dpb11, DNA replication regulator Dpb11
- E2F, E2F transcription factor
- EL, early to late origins transition
- ETG1, E2F target gene 1/replisome factor
- Fkh, fork head domain protein
- GCN5, histone acetyltransferase GCN5
- GINS, go-ichi-ni-san
- LE, late to early origins transition
- MCM2–7, minichromosome maintenance helicase complex
- NDT, N-terminus domain
- ORC, origin recognition complex
- ORCA, origin recognition complex subunit A
- PCC, premature chromosome condensation
- PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen
- RO, replication origin
- RPD3, histone deacetylase 3
- RTC, replication timing control
- Rif1, replication timing regulatory factor 1
- SCF, Skp1-Cullin-F-Box ligase
- SIR, sulfite reductase
- Sld2, replication regulator Sld2
- Sld3, replication regulator Sld3
- Swi6, chromatin-associated protein swi6
- Taz1, telomere length regulator taz1
- YKU70, yeast Ku protein.
- dormant origins
- mathematical models of replication
- ori, origin
- origin competence
- origin efficiency
- origin firing
- origin licensing
- p53, tumor suppressor protein p53
- replication timing
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelina W Musiałek
- a Department of Cytophysiology ; Institute of Experimental Biology; Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection; University of Łódź ; Łódź , Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hyrien O. Peaks cloaked in the mist: the landscape of mammalian replication origins. J Cell Biol 2015; 208:147-60. [PMID: 25601401 PMCID: PMC4298691 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201407004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2014] [Accepted: 12/16/2014] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Replication of mammalian genomes starts at sites termed replication origins, which historically have been difficult to locate as a result of large genome sizes, limited power of genetic identification schemes, and rareness and fragility of initiation intermediates. However, origins are now mapped by the thousands using microarrays and sequencing techniques. Independent studies show modest concordance, suggesting that mammalian origins can form at any DNA sequence but are suppressed by read-through transcription or that they can overlap the 5' end or even the entire gene. These results require a critical reevaluation of whether origins form at specific DNA elements and/or epigenetic signals or require no such determinants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Hyrien
- Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR8197 and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1024, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith OK, Aladjem MI. Chromatin structure and replication origins: determinants of chromosome replication and nuclear organization. J Mol Biol 2014; 426:3330-41. [PMID: 24905010 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2014] [Revised: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 05/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The DNA replication program is, in part, determined by the epigenetic landscape that governs local chromosome architecture and directs chromosome duplication. Replication must coordinate with other biochemical processes occurring concomitantly on chromatin, such as transcription and remodeling, to insure accurate duplication of both genetic and epigenetic features and to preserve genomic stability. The importance of genome architecture and chromatin looping in coordinating cellular processes on chromatin is illustrated by two recent sets of discoveries. First, chromatin-associated proteins that are not part of the core replication machinery were shown to affect the timing of DNA replication. These chromatin-associated proteins could be working in concert, or perhaps in competition, with the transcriptional machinery and with chromatin modifiers to determine the spatial and temporal organization of replication initiation events. Second, epigenetic interactions are mediated by DNA sequences that determine chromosomal replication. In this review, we summarize recent findings and current models linking spatial and temporal regulation of the replication program with epigenetic signaling. We discuss these issues in the context of the genome's three-dimensional structure with an emphasis on events occurring during the initiation of DNA replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen K Smith
- DNA Replication Group, Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Mirit I Aladjem
- DNA Replication Group, Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
ORC (origin recognition complex) serves as the initiator for the assembly of the pre-RC (pre-replication complex) and the subsequent DNA replication. Together with many of its non-replication functions, ORC is a pivotal regulator of various cellular processes. Notably, a number of reports connect ORC to numerous human diseases, including MGS (Meier-Gorlin syndrome), EBV (Epstein-Barr virus)-infected diseases, American trypanosomiasis and African trypanosomiasis. However, much of the underlying molecular mechanism remains unclear. In those genetic diseases, mutations in ORC alter its function and lead to the dysregulated phenotypes; whereas in some pathogen-induced symptoms, host ORC and archaeal-like ORC are exploited by these organisms to maintain their own genomes. In this review, I provide detailed examples of ORC-related human diseases, and summarize the current findings on how ORC is involved and/or dysregulated. I further discuss how these discoveries can be generalized as model systems, which can then be applied to elucidating other related diseases and revealing potential targets for developing effective therapies.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ulrich HD. New insights into replication clamp unloading. J Mol Biol 2013; 425:4727-32. [PMID: 23688817 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2013] [Revised: 05/08/2013] [Accepted: 05/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The sliding clamp protein proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is situated at the core of the eukaryotic replisome, where it acts as an interaction scaffold for numerous replication and repair factors and coordinates DNA transactions ranging from Okazaki fragment maturation to chromatin assembly and mismatch repair. PCNA is loaded onto DNA by a dedicated complex, the replication factor C, whose mechanism has been studied in detail. Until recently, however, it was unclear how PCNA is removed from DNA upon completion of DNA synthesis. Two complementary studies now present data strongly implicating the replication factor C-like complex, Elg1/ATAD5-RLC, in the unloading of PCNA during replication in yeast and human cells. They indicate that an appropriate control over PCNA's residence on the chromatin is important for maintaining genome stability. At the same time, they suggest that the interaction of Elg1/ATAD5 with SUMO, which was also reported to contribute to its role in genome maintenance, affects aspects of its function distinct from its unloading activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helle D Ulrich
- Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, Clare Hall Laboratories, Blanche Lane, South Mimms EN6 3LD, United Kingdom; Institute of Molecular Biology, Ackermannweg 4, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|