A phase I radiation dose-escalation study to determine the maximal dose of radiotherapy in combination with weekly gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (gemcitabine-based) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the Pisa University experience

INTRODUCTION

The role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) is controversial. In this study we aimed to assess the feasibility, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (gemcitabine based) in patients with resected PA and their correlation with prognostic factors.

METHODS

122 resected patients (stage ≥IIa) treated between February 1999 and December 2013 were analyzed. Two cycles of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days) were administered before concomitant radiotherapy (45 Gy/25 fractions) and chemotherapy (gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 weekly).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 22.7 months (range 4-109). Gastrointestinal toxicity (G3), neutropenia (G3-G4) and cardiac toxicity (G2-G3) were observed in 2.4%, 10.6% and 1.6% of patients, respectively. OS at 12, 24 and 60 months was 79%, 55% and 31%, respectively (median 25 months). Two-year OS in patients with postoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≤70 and ≥80 was 37.1% and 62.3%, respectively (p<0.0001). OS was better in the group of patients with a postoperative CA 19-9 level ≤100 U/mL (p = 0.014). Median DFS was 17 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of concomitant gemcitabine and radiotherapy in patients with radically resected PA was well tolerated and associated with a low incidence of local recurrences. Five-year OS was significantly influenced by postoperative KPS and CA 19-9 values.

Outcome impact and cost-effectiveness of quality assurance for radiotherapy planned for the EORTC 22071-24071 prospective study for head and neck cancer

INTRODUCTION

One of the goals of Quality Assurance in Radiotherapy (QART) is to reduce the variability and uncertainties related to treatment planning and beam delivery. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome impact and cost-effectiveness (CE) of various QART levels for a head and neck (H&N) cancer study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

QART levels were defined as: basic QART with a dummy run (level 2), level 2 plus prospective Individual Case Reviews (ICRs) for 15% of patients (level 3) and level 2 plus prospective ICRs for all patients (level 4). The follow-up of patients was modeled using a multi-state model with parameters derived from EORTC, TROG and RTOG prospective studies. Individual patient data, linking QART results with outcome, were retrieved from the TROG database. Results for each QART level were expressed as percentage of mortality and local failure at 5 years.

RESULTS

Quality-of-life-adjusted and recurrence-free survival increased with increasing QART levels. The increase of all these metrics was more sizeable with an increased QART level from 2 or 3 to 4. The estimated quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) for an increase of QART levels of 3-4 and 2-4 were 0.09 and 0.15, respectively. The incremental CE ratio was €5525 and €3659 Euros per QALY for these QART levels. Compared to QART level 2 or 3, level 4 was cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing QART levels resulted in better patient outcome in this simulated study. The increased complexity of the QART program was also cost-effective.

Gemcitabine in the chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis

AIMS

Whether gemcitabine based chemoradiotherapy (GEM-based CRT) is superior to 5-fluorouracil based chemoradiotherapy (5-FU-based CRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) remains uncertain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of GEM-based CRT compared with 5-FU-based CRT.

METHODS

Electronic database including Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials register, PubMed (update to December 2010) and manual bibliography searches were carried out. A meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or other comparative studies comparing GEM-based CRT and 5-FU-based CRT were performed.

RESULTS

Three RCTs and one retrospective comparative study including 229 patients were assessed. Meta-analysis showed survival advantage of GEM-based CRT compared with 5-FU-based CRT for 12-month (12-mo) survival rates (SRs) (RR=1.54, 95% CI 1.05-2.26, p=0.03). Moreover, there were also trends of benefit for SR after 6-months (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.98-1.30, p=0.09) and 24-months (24-mo: RR 2.41, 95% CI 0.90-6.48, p=0.08), though the trends did not reach statistical significance. More frequent severe acute hematologic toxicities were found in the GEM-based CRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis found that GEM-based CRT was better than 5-FU-based CRT in the treatment of LAPC, especially for 12-mo SRs. However, the acute toxicity should be carefully regarded.

Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis and remains a significant cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Most patients survive less than 1 year; chemotherapeutic options prolong life minimally. The best chance for long-term survival is complete resection, which offers a 3-year survival of only 15%. Most patients who do undergo resection will go on to die of their disease. Research in chemotherapy for metastatic disease has made only modest progress and the standard of care remains the purine analog gemcitabine. For resectable pancreatic cancer, presumed micrometastases provide the rationale for adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation (CRT) to supplement surgical management. Numerous randomized control trials, none definitive, of adjuvant chemotherapy and CRT have been conducted and are summarized in this review, along with recent developments in how unresectable disease can be subcategorized according to the potential for eventual curative resection. This review will also emphasize palliative care and discuss some avenues of research that show early promise.

The role of radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma

The prognosis for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma remains dismal despite advances in chemotherapy and radiotherapy over the past few decades. The use of radiotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma is often disputed because of the hypothesis that patients with pancreatic cancer die from distant metastases. It is well accepted that the greatest chance for cure of pancreatic cancer involves surgical resection of the primary tumor. However, there is much controversy about the role of radiotherapy in local disease control. The aim of this Review is to discuss data from the available studies, both prospective and retrospective, that evaluate treatment options for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. We focus on the benefits associated with local therapies, including radiotherapy and surgical resection, as they relate to improved local disease control, prolonged overall survival and improved symptom control.

Nicardipine reverses the resistance of human pancreatic carcinoma Patu8988 cell line to pemetrexed

AIM: To investigate whether safe doses of nicardipine, an antagonist of ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2), can reverse the resistance of human pancreatic carcinoma Patu8988 cell line to pemetrexed.

METHODS: The maximal safe dose of nicardipine for pemetrexed-resistant Patu8988 strain and its parent strain was determined by methyl thiazoly tetrazolium (MTT) assay. The half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀) of pemetrexed alone and in combination with nicardipine for the growth of the two cell strains were measured also by MTT assay. The apoptosis rates of the two cell strains were examined using DAPI nuclear staining and flow cytometry.

RESULTS: MTT analysis showed that the maximal safe dose of nicardipine for Patu8988 strains was 4.85 μmol/L (2.5 mg/L). Although there was no significant difference in the IC₅₀ value in parental Patu8988 cell strain between pemetrexed alone and pemetrexed in combination with safe doses of nicardipine, a significant difference was noted in the IC₅₀ value in drug-resistant Patu8988 strain (P < 0.05). Flow cytometry analysis showed that the apoptosis rate of drug-resistant cells treated with pemetrexed in combination with nicardipine was higher than that of cells treated with pemetrexed alone (32.27% ± 2.8% vs 50.5% ± 4.2%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Nicardipine at safe doses can increase the sensitivity of drug-resistant Patu8988 cell strain to pemetrexed, but has no significant effect in parental Patu8988 strain.