1
|
Roth GS, Verlingue L, Sarabi M, Blanc JF, Boleslawski E, Boudjema K, Bretagne-Bignon AL, Camus-Duboc M, Coriat R, Créhange G, De Baere T, de la Fouchardière C, Dromain C, Edeline J, Gelli M, Guiu B, Horn S, Laurent-Croise V, Lepage C, Lièvre A, Lopez A, Manfredi S, Meilleroux J, Neuzillet C, Paradis V, Prat F, Ronot M, Rosmorduc O, Cunha AS, Soubrane O, Turpin A, Louvet C, Bouché O, Malka D. Biliary tract cancers: French national clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, UNICANCER, GERCOR, SFCD, SFED, AFEF, SFRO, SFP, SFR, ACABi, ACHBPT). Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:114000. [PMID: 38493667 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines of the management of biliary tract cancers (BTC) (intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas) published in September 2023, available on the website of the French Society of Gastroenterology (SNFGE) (www.tncd.org). METHODS This collaborative work was conducted under the auspices of French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of BTC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B and C) according to the level of scientific evidence until August 2023. RESULTS BTC diagnosis and staging is mainly based on enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and (endoscopic) ultrasound-guided biopsy. Treatment strategy depends on BTC subtype and disease stage. Surgery followed by adjuvant capecitabine is recommended for localised disease. No neoadjuvant treatment is validated to date. Cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy combined to the anti-PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is the first-line standard of care for advanced disease. Early systematic tumour molecular profiling is recommended to screen for actionable alterations (IDH1 mutations, FGFR2 rearrangements, HER2 amplification, BRAFV600E mutation, MSI/dMMR status, etc.) and guide subsequent lines of treatment. In the absence of actionable alterations, FOLFOX chemotherapy is the only second-line standard-of-care. No third-line chemotherapy standard is validated to date. CONCLUSION These guidelines are intended to provide a personalised therapeutic strategy for daily clinical practice. Each individual BTC case should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gael S Roth
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes / Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, CHU Grenoble Alpes / Institute for Advanced Biosciences, CNRS UMR 5309-INSERM U1209, Grenoble, France
| | - Loic Verlingue
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon, France
| | - Matthieu Sarabi
- Gastroenterology Department, Hopital privé Jean Mermoz, 69008 Lyon, France
| | | | - Emmanuel Boleslawski
- Univ. Lille, INSERM U1189, CHU Lille, Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Transplantations, Lille, France
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Département de chirurgie viscérale hépatobiliaire, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | - Marine Camus-Duboc
- Endoscopie digestive, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Service de gastroentérologie, d'endoscopie et d'oncologie digestive, Hôpital Cochin, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Radiation Oncology Department. Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, Institut Curie. PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Thierry De Baere
- Département de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | | | - Clarisse Dromain
- Service de radiodiagnostic et radiologie interventionnelle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Switzerland
| | | | - Maximiliano Gelli
- Département de Chirurgie Viscérale, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Boris Guiu
- Department of Radiology, St-Eloi University Hospital - Montpellier School of Medicine, Montpellier, France
| | - Samy Horn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Valérie Laurent-Croise
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Hôpital de Brabois, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Côme Lepage
- Université de Bourgogne, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, INSERM U1231. BP 87 900, 14 rue Paul Gaffarel, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - Astrid Lièvre
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rennes University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, INSERM Unité 1242, Rennes, France
| | - Anthony Lopez
- INSERM U1256, NGERE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, NGERE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Sylvain Manfredi
- Université de Bourgogne, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, INSERM U1231. BP 87 900, 14 rue Paul Gaffarel, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - Julie Meilleroux
- Pathology and Cytology Department, CHU Toulouse, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - Cindy Neuzillet
- GI Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie - Site Saint Cloud, Versailles Saint-Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Valérie Paradis
- Université Paris Cité, APHP.Nord Sce d'Anatomie Pathologique Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, INSERM UMR 1149, France
| | - Frédéric Prat
- Endoscopie digestive, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Department of Medical Imaging, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Olivier Rosmorduc
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, INSERM U1193, Université Paris-Saclay, FHU Hépatinov, France
| | - Antonio Sa Cunha
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, INSERM U1193, Université Paris-Saclay, FHU Hépatinov, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Anthony Turpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, CNRS UMR9020, Inserm UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille; GERCOR, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Louvet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Robert-Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - David Malka
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Groß S, Bitzer M, Albert J, Blödt S, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Caspari R, De Toni E, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Follmann M, Freudenberger P, Gani C, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Krug D, La Fougère C, Lang H, Langer T, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Nothacker M, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Steubesand N, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Tholen R, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome“ – Langversion 4.0. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:e213-e282. [PMID: 38364849 DOI: 10.1055/a-2189-8567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | - Susanne Blödt
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF), Berlin
| | | | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein, Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | | | - Markus Follmann
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | | | - Cihan Gani
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF), Berlin
| | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | | | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
| | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Bundesverband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Arndt Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bitzer M, Groß S, Albert J, Blödt S, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Caspari R, De Toni E, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Follmann M, Freudenberger P, Gani C, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Krug D, Fougère CL, Lang H, Langer T, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Nothacker M, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Steubesand N, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Tholen R, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Hepatozellulären Karzinoms“ – Langversion 4.0. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:e67-e161. [PMID: 38195102 DOI: 10.1055/a-2189-6353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | - Susanne Blödt
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V.(AWMF), Berlin
| | | | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | | | - Markus Follmann
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | | | - Cihan Gani
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V.(AWMF), Berlin
| | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | | | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | | | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Bundesverband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Arndt Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Owen M, Makary MS, Beal EW. Locoregional Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2384. [PMID: 37190311 PMCID: PMC10137284 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has a poor prognosis, and surgical resection (SR) offers the only potential for cure. Unfortunately, only a small proportion of patients are eligible for resection due to locally advanced or metastatic disease. Locoregional therapies (LRT) are often used in unresectable liver-only or liver-dominant ICC. This review explores the role of these therapies in the treatment of ICC, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy, irreversible electroporation (IE), and brachytherapy. A search of the current literature was performed to examine types of LRT currently used in the treatment of ICC. We examined patient selection, technique, and outcomes of each type. Overall, LRTs are well-tolerated in the treatment of ICC and are effective in improving overall survival (OS) in this patient population. Further studies are needed to reduce bias from heterogenous patient populations and small sample sizes, as well as to determine whether certain LRTs are superior to others and to examine optimal treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzie Owen
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Mina S. Makary
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Eliza W. Beal
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bitzer M, Groß S, Albert J, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Caspari R, De Toni E, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Kautz A, Krug D, Fougère CL, Lang H, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Tholen R, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome – Langversion. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:e92-e156. [PMID: 37040776 DOI: 10.1055/a-2026-1240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | | | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | | | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | | | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschrirugie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | | | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | | | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Bundesverband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Arndt Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paronetto C, den Toom W, Milder MTW, van Norden Y, Baak R, Heijmen BJM, Méndez Romero A. Inter- and intrafraction dose variations in robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in the prospective phase I STRONG trial. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1114737. [PMID: 36969072 PMCID: PMC10032458 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1114737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Using fiducial-marker-based robotic respiratory tumor tracking, we treated perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients in the STRONG trial with 15 daily fractions of 4 Gy. For each of the included patients, in-room diagnostic-quality repeat CTs (rCT) were acquired pre- and post-dose delivery in 6 treatment fractions to analyze inter- and intrafraction dose variations. Planning CTs (pCTs) and rCTs were acquired in expiration breath-hold. Analogous to treatment, spine and fiducials were used to register rCTs with pCTs. In each rCT, all OARs were contoured, and the target was rigidly copied from the pCT based on grey values. The rCTs acquired were used to calculate the doses to be delivered through the treatment-unit settings. On average, target doses in rCTs and pCTs were similar. However, due to target displacements relative to the fiducials in rCTs, 10% of the rCTs showed PTV coverage losses of >10%. Although target coverages had been planned below desired values in order to protect OARs, many pre-rCTs contained OAR constraint violations: 44.4% for the 6 major constraints. Most OAR dose differences between pre- and post-rCTs were not statistically significant. The dose deviations observed in repeat CTs represent opportunities for more advanced adaptive approaches to enhancing SBRT treatment quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Paronetto
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV), Padova, Italy
- *Correspondence: Chiara Paronetto, ,
| | - Wilhelm den Toom
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maaike T. W. Milder
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yvette van Norden
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rogier Baak
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ben J. M. Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alejandra Méndez Romero
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization followed by moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:293-303. [PMID: 36441171 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02022-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the gold standard treatment in intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but long-term disease control rates remain low. Herein, we compared results of TACE followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy (TACE-hRT) to surgical resection (SR) in early single or paucinodular intrahepatic HCC. METHODS Between June 2004 and November 2016, data on 160 consecutive patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A Child-Pugh A HCC treated with SR or TACE-hRT in our expert center were retrospectively reviewed. Time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were compared using the stabilized-weights inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score. RESULTS Ninety-eight patients underwent SR and 62 were treated by TACE-hRT. Median total dose of RT was 54 Gy (interquartile range [IQR] 54-54) in 3‑Gy fractions. Median OS follow-up was 93 months. TTP did not significantly differ between patients following SR and TACE-hRT, with 1‑year rates of 68.2% and 82.6% (p = 0.17), respectively. In contrast, PFS and OS were lower in the TACE-hRT group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.006), with a median OS of 37 vs. 63 months for patients with surgery and TACE-hRT, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a significant negative impact on PFS and OS was seen for age at diagnosis, on TTP for alcohol-related liver disease, and on OS for total number of HCC nodules. Symptomatic grade ≥ 3 adverse events were presented by 42 (42.9%) SR and 19 (30.6%) TACE-hRT patients (p = 0.17). CONCLUSION In patients presenting Child-Pugh A BCLC‑A HCC with high risk for surgical complications, TACE-hRT can be an effective and safe treatment. However, surgical management remains the standard of care whenever possible.
Collapse
|
8
|
Actual over 3-year survival after stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:731-738. [PMID: 36401766 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02979-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE As a non-invasive treatment, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been an emerging and effective option for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The Cyber Knife has an SBRT system, which can realize real-time tracking of tumors during treatment. It can protect the surrounding normal liver tissue while the tumor gets the therapeutic dose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting the local control rate for patients after SBRT treatment, and to predict the factors affecting survival rates, then to report the 3-year actual survival rates after treatment and identify the influencing factors of 3-year survival rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a long-term follow-up of 43 patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent Cyber Knife in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2018. Regular medical check-ups were performed every 2-3 months after SBRT to evaluated the effect of treatment. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 15 months (4-78 months), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months (95% CI, 2.788-9.212) and the median overall survival (OS) was 12 months (95% CI, 3.434-20.566), respectively. Based on modified Response Evaluation and Criteria in Solid Tumor (mRECIST), response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) of SBRT in unresectable ICC were 55.2% and 86%. The 1-, 2- and 3-years OS rate were 51.2%, 32.6% and 23.3%. Multivariate analysis based on competing risk survival analysis identified that patients with multiple nodules, large diameter, high level of CA199 and CEA, poor ECOG performance status had worse overall survival (p < 0.05). Patients who survived ≥3 years had significantly lower levels of CEA, CA199, smaller tumor diameters and lower number of lesions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION The SBRT might be a candidate option for patients who unable to perform surgery. The rate of 3-year survival after SBRT for unresectable ICC can be expected with 23.3%.
Collapse
|
9
|
Elias C, Zeidan YH, Bouferraa Y, Mukherji D, Temraz S, Charafeddine M, Al Darazi M, Shamseddine A. A phase II single arm study of Nivolumab with stereotactic Ablative radiation Therapy after induction chemotherapy in CHOlangiocarcinoma (NATCHO). BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1296. [PMID: 36503610 PMCID: PMC9743639 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10373-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is amongst the most common primary liver tumors worldwide. CCA carries a bad prognosis prompting research to establish new treatment modalities other than surgery and the current chemotherapeutic regimens adopted. Hence, this trial explores a new therapeutic approach, to combine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and immunotherapy (Nivolumab), and asses its clinical benefit and safety profile after induction chemotherapy in CCA. METHODOLOGY This is a Phase II open-label, single-arm, multicenter study that investigates Nivolumab (PD-1 inhibitor) treatment at Day 1 followed by SBRT (30 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions) at Day 8, then monthly Nivolumab in 40 patients with non-resectable locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent intrahepatic or extrahepatic CCA. Eligible patients were those above 18 years of age with a pathologically and radiologically confirmed diagnosis of non-resectable locally advanced or metastatic or recurrent intrahepatic or extrahepatic CCA, following 4 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy with an estimated life expectancy of more than 3 months, among other criteria. The primary endpoint is the progression free survival (PFS) rate at 8 months and disease control rate (DCR). The secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), tumor response rate (TRR), duration of response, evaluation of biomarkers: CD3 + , CD4 + and CD8 + T cell infiltration, as well as any change in the PD-L1 expression through percutaneous core biopsy when compared with the baseline biopsy following 1 cycle of Nivolumab and SBRT. DISCUSSION SRBT alone showed promising results in the literature by both inducing the immune system locally and having abscopal effects on distant metastases. Moreover, given the prevalence of PD-L1 in solid tumors, targeting it or its receptor has become the mainstay of novel immunotherapeutic drugs use. A combination of both has never been explored in the scope of CCA and that is the aim of this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04648319 , April 20, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charbel Elias
- grid.411654.30000 0004 0581 3406Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute- NKBCI, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Youssef H. Zeidan
- grid.411654.30000 0004 0581 3406Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Youssef Bouferraa
- grid.411654.30000 0004 0581 3406Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute- NKBCI, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- grid.411654.30000 0004 0581 3406Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute- NKBCI, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Sally Temraz
- grid.411654.30000 0004 0581 3406Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute- NKBCI, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Maya Charafeddine
- grid.411654.30000 0004 0581 3406Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute- NKBCI, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Monita Al Darazi
- grid.411654.30000 0004 0581 3406Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute- NKBCI, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ali Shamseddine
- grid.411654.30000 0004 0581 3406Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute- NKBCI, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tran A, Konstantinidis M, Moon J, El Sehemawi N, Ferreira K, Habibollahi P, Odisio BC, Nourouzpour S, Bassir A, Nezami N. Interventions for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a network meta‐analysis. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2022; 2022:CD015159. [PMCID: PMC9730740 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To establish the existence of differences in effectiveness and safety of intra‐arterial therapies (IATs) such as bland embolisation, conventional transarterial chemoembolisation (cTACE), drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolisation (DEBTACE), yttrium‐90 (Y90), hepatic artery infusion (HAI), external beam radiotherapies (EBRTs), and immunotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma through pairwise meta‐analysis and network meta‐analysis with subsequent treatment ranking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Tran
- UT Health McGovern Medical SchoolHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Menelaos Konstantinidis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of TorontoTorontoCanada,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - John Moon
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging SciencesEmory University School of MedicineAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | | | | - Peiman Habibollahi
- Department of Interventional RadiologyDivision of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional RadiologyDivision of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | | | - Ali Bassir
- Department of Radiological SciencesDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Nariman Nezami
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear MedicineUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA,Experimental Therapeutics Program, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim TH, Woo SM, Lee WJ, Chun JW, Cho YR, Kim BH, Koh YH, Kim SS, Oh ES, Lee DY, Lee SU, Suh YG, Moon SH, Park JW. Clinical Efficacy of Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225561. [PMID: 36428654 PMCID: PMC9688899 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Forty-seven patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) who received proton beam therapy (PBT) were analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of hypofractionated PBT in patients with inoperable or recurrent IHCC. The median prescribed dose of PBT was 63.3 GyE (range: 45-80 GyE) in 10 fractions, and the median duration of follow-up in all the patients was 18.3 months (range: 2.4-89.9 months). Disease progression occurred in 35 of the 47 (74.5%) patients; local, intrahepatic, and extrahepatic progression occurred in 5 (10.6%), 20 (42.6%), and 29 (61.7%) patients, respectively. The 2-year freedom from local progression (FFLP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) rates, and median time of OS were 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.4-99.4%), 16.8% (95% CI, 4.3-29.3%), 42.7% (95% CI, 28.0-57.4%), and 21.9 months (95% CI, 16.2-28.3 months), respectively; grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in four (8.5%) patients. In selected patients with localized disease (no viable tumors outside of the PBT sites), the median time of OS was 33.8 months (95% CI, 5.4-62.3). These findings suggest that hypofractionated PBT is safe and could offer a high rate of FFLP and promising OS in patients with inoperable or recurrent IHCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Hyun Kim
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-31-920-1725; Fax: +82-31-920-0149
| | - Sang Myung Woo
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Woo Jin Lee
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Jung Won Chun
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Yu Ri Cho
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Bo Hyun Kim
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Young-Hwan Koh
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Sang Soo Kim
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Eun Sang Oh
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Do Yeul Lee
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Sung Uk Lee
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Yang-Gun Suh
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Sung Ho Moon
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Joong-Won Park
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Borakati A, Froghi F, Bhogal RH, Mavroeidis VK. Stereotactic radiotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14:1478-1489. [PMID: 36160742 PMCID: PMC9412934 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i8.1478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is an aggressive malignancy with an increasing incidence worldwide and poor prognosis, despite several advances and continuous efforts to develop effective treatments. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment and offers a potentially curative option, but is only possible in less than a third of patients, owing to advanced disease. Chemotherapy is a well-established treatment in the adjuvant and palliative setting, however, confers limited benefit. Conventional radiotherapy is challenging due to local toxicity. With recent advances in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), it is now possible to focus ablative beams of radiotherapy precisely aimed at tumours to minimise damage to surrounding viscera. This review details the history, technical background and application of SABR to iCCA, with directions for future research suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Borakati
- Department of Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Farid Froghi
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
| | - Ricky H Bhogal
- Department of Academic Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
| | - Vasileios K Mavroeidis
- Department of Academic Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bitzer M, Voesch S, Albert J, Bartenstein P, Bechstein W, Blödt S, Brunner T, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Follmann M, La Fougère C, Freudenberger P, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Hammes E, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Hofmann WP, Huppert P, Kautz A, Knötgen G, Körber J, Krug D, Lammert F, Lang H, Langer T, Lenz P, Mahnken A, Meining A, Micke O, Nadalin S, Nguyen HP, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Paradies K, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plauth M, Plentz R, Pohl J, Riemer J, Reimer P, Ringwald J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schmid I, Schuler A, von Schweinitz D, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stein A, Stengel A, Steubesand N, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Tholen R, Vogel A, Vogl T, Vorwerk H, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wittekind C, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie – Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:e186-e227. [PMID: 35148560 DOI: 10.1055/a-1589-7854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M Bitzer
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - S Voesch
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - J Albert
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart
| | - P Bartenstein
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, LMU Klinikum, München
| | - W Bechstein
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
| | - S Blödt
- AWMF-Geschäftsstelle, Berlin
| | - T Brunner
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg
| | - F Dombrowski
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
| | - M Evert
- Institut für Pathologie, Regensburg
| | - M Follmann
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, c/o Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V., Berlin
| | - C La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Tübingen
| | | | - A Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - E Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | | | - E Hammes
- Lebertransplantierte Deutschland e. V., Ansbach
| | - T Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal-invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen, München
| | - R T Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Dresden
| | - W P Hofmann
- Gastroenterologie am Bayerischen Platz, medizinisches Versorgungszentrum, Berlin
| | - P Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühl
| | - A Kautz
- Deutsche Leberhilfe e.V., Köln
| | - G Knötgen
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg
| | - J Körber
- Klinik Nahetal, Fachklinik für onkologische Rehabilitation und Anschlussrehabilitation, Bad Kreuznach
| | - D Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel
| | | | - H Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
| | - T Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, c/o Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V., Berlin
| | - P Lenz
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Münster
| | - A Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Marburg
| | - A Meining
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II des Universitätsklinikums Würzburg
| | - O Micke
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld
| | - S Nadalin
- Universitätsklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | | | - J Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen
| | - K Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Semmelweis Universität, Asklepios Campus Hamburg
| | - P Paprottka
- Abteilung für interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
| | - K Paradies
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg
| | - P Pereira
- Abteilung für interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
| | - T Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | | | - R Plentz
- Klinikum Bremen-Nord, Innere Medizin, Bremen
| | - J Pohl
- Interventionelles Endoskopiezentrum und Schwerpunkt Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg
| | - J Riemer
- Lebertransplantierte Deutschland e. V., Bretzfeld
| | - P Reimer
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH, Karlsruhe
| | - J Ringwald
- Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | | | - E Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Gießen
| | - B Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - P Schirmacher
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - I Schmid
- Zentrum Pädiatrische Hämatologie und Onkologie, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, Klinikum der Universität München
| | - A Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Alb Fils Kliniken GmbH, Göppingen
| | | | - D Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - M Sinn
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - A Stein
- Hämatologisch-Onkologischen Praxis Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - A Stengel
- Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | | | - C Stoll
- Klinik Herzoghöhe Bayreuth, Bayreuth
| | - A Tannapfel
- Institut für Pathologie der Ruhr-Universität Bochum am Berufsgenossenschaftlichen Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Bochum
| | - A Taubert
- Kliniksozialdienst, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Bochum
| | - J Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
| | | | - R Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie e. V., Köln
| | - A Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Endokrinologie der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
| | - T Vogl
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Frankfurt
| | - H Vorwerk
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Marburg
| | - F Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
| | - O Waidmann
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
| | - H Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
| | - H Wege
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - D Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Lauf an der Pegnitz
| | - C Wittekind
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig
| | - M A Wörns
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Mainz, Mainz
| | - P Galle
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Mainz, Mainz
| | - N Malek
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Thuehøj AU, Andersen NC, Worm ES, Høyer M, Tabaksblat EM, Weber B, Mortensen HR. Clinical outcomes after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:197-201. [PMID: 34726565 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1995893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Esben Schjødt Worm
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Centre of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Britta Weber
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Centre of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hanna Rahbek Mortensen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Centre of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Inchingolo R, Acquafredda F, Ferraro V, Laera L, Surico G, Surgo A, Fiorentino A, Marini S, de'Angelis N, Memeo R, Spiliopoulos S. Non-surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:1696-1708. [PMID: 34853644 PMCID: PMC8603446 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i11.1696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer of the biliary confluence also known as hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) or Klatskin tumor, is a rare type of neoplastic disease constituting approximately 40%-60% of intrahepatic malignancies, and 2% of all cancers. The prognosis is extremely poor and the majority of Klatskin tumors are deemed unresectable upon diagnosis. Most patients with unresectable bile duct cancer die within the first year after diagnosis, due to hepatic failure, and/or infectious complications secondary to biliary obstruction. Curative treatments include surgical resection and liver transplantation in highly selected patients. Nevertheless, very few patients are eligible for surgery or transplant at the time of diagnosis. For patients with unresectable HC, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and liver-directed minimally invasive procedures such as percutaneous image-guided ablation and intra-arterial chemoembolization are recommended treatment options. This review focuses on currently available treatment options for unresectable HC and discusses future perspectives that could optimize outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Inchingolo
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70124, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Acquafredda
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70124, Italy
| | - Valentina Ferraro
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Letizia Laera
- Department of Oncology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Surico
- Department of Oncology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Stefania Marini
- Department of Radiology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Stavros Spiliopoulos
- 2nd Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 12461, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Baak R, Willemssen FEJA, van Norden Y, Eskens FALM, Milder MTW, Heijmen BJM, Koerkamp BG, Sprengers D, van Driel LMJW, Klümpen HJ, den Toom W, Koedijk MS, IJzermans JNM, Méndez Romero A. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy after Chemotherapy for Unresectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: The STRONG Trial, a Phase I Safety and Feasibility Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13163991. [PMID: 34439146 PMCID: PMC8394718 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13163991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The role of radiotherapy in the treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma has not yet been properly defined. In this prospective study, we therefore explored the addition to first-line chemotherapy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered in 15 fractions. Patients eligible for the study had been diagnosed with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and then had no progressive disease after completing treatment with 6–8 cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine. Primary endpoints were feasibility and safety. Secondary endpoints were local control, progression-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life. As each patient completed the SBRT successfully and no dose-limiting toxicity was found, we consider this treatment to be both feasible and safe. The local control rate and overall survival were promising. However, due to the small sample size of this study, we urge the analysis of this treatment in a larger series of patients. Abstract Background: In unresectable pCCA, the standard of care is palliative chemotherapy. We investigated the feasibility and safety of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) after chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with unresectable pCCA, stage T1-T4N0-N1M0, ECOG 0-1, having finished 6–8 cycles of cisplatin and gemcitabine without disease progression were eligible. SBRT was planned in 15 fractions of 3.0–4.5 Gy. The primary endpoints were feasibility (defined as completing SBRT as planned) and toxicity, evaluated within 3 months after SBRT (CTCAE v4.03). A conventional “3 + 3” design was used, corresponding to a sample size of 6 patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade ≥ 4 hepatobiliary or grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. The secondary endpoints, measured from the start of radiotherapy, were local control, progression-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life (QoL). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03307538. Results: Six patients were enrolled between November 2017 and March 2020. SBRT was delivered as planned. All patients were treated with 60Gy (15 × 4.0Gy). No SBRT-related DLT was observed. The most common grade ≥ 3 toxicity was cholangitis (n = 5). The median follow-up was 14 months. The 12-month local control rate was 80%. We observed no substantial changes in QoL. Conclusion: In patients with unresectable pCCA with stable disease after palliative chemotherapy, adding SBRT is feasible and safe. The observed local control merits an additional evaluation of effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogier Baak
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (Y.v.N.); (M.T.W.M.); (B.J.M.H.); (W.d.T.); (A.M.R.)
- Correspondence:
| | - François E. J. A. Willemssen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Yvette van Norden
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (Y.v.N.); (M.T.W.M.); (B.J.M.H.); (W.d.T.); (A.M.R.)
| | - Ferry A. L. M. Eskens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Maaike T. W. Milder
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (Y.v.N.); (M.T.W.M.); (B.J.M.H.); (W.d.T.); (A.M.R.)
| | - Ben J. M. Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (Y.v.N.); (M.T.W.M.); (B.J.M.H.); (W.d.T.); (A.M.R.)
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (B.G.K.); (J.N.M.I.)
| | - Dave Sprengers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (D.S.); (L.M.J.W.v.D.)
| | - Lydi M. J. W. van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (D.S.); (L.M.J.W.v.D.)
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Wilhelm den Toom
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (Y.v.N.); (M.T.W.M.); (B.J.M.H.); (W.d.T.); (A.M.R.)
| | - Merel S. Koedijk
- Radiotherapeutisch Instituut Friesland, 8934 AD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands;
| | - Jan N. M. IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (B.G.K.); (J.N.M.I.)
| | - Alejandra Méndez Romero
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (Y.v.N.); (M.T.W.M.); (B.J.M.H.); (W.d.T.); (A.M.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yacoub JH, Mauro D, Moon A, He AR, Bashir MR, Hsu CC, Fishbein TM, Burke LMB. Therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: overview, clinical indications, and comparative outcome evaluation. Part two: noncurative intention. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3540-3548. [PMID: 33864107 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03074-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Locoregional therapies can be offered to hepatocellular carcinoma patients as a bridge to transplant, to downstage disease burden for transplant eligibility, or for disease control to prolong survival. Systemic therapies also play a large role in HCC treatment, occasionally in conjunction with other methods. This manuscript reviews the various treatment options for HCC with a historically noncurative intent.
Collapse
|
18
|
Gkika E, Hawkins MA, Grosu AL, Brunner TB. The Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 10:604387. [PMID: 33381458 PMCID: PMC7768034 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.604387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a disease entity comprising diverse epithelial tumors, which are categorized according to their anatomical location as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), distal (dCCA) cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas (GBC), with distinct epidemiology, biology, and prognosis. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay in operable BTC as it is the only potentially curative treatment option. Nevertheless, even after curative (R0) resection, the 5-year survival rate ranges between 20 and 40% and the disease free survival rates (DFS) is approximately 48–65% after one year and 23–35% after three years without adjuvant treatment. Improvements in adjuvant chemotherapy have improved the DFS, but the role of adjuvant radiotherapy is unclear. On the other hand, more than 50% of the patients present with unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis, which limits the prognosis to a few months without treatment. Herein, we review the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in the curative and palliative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria A Hawkins
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang M, Chen Z, Guo P, Wang Y, Chen G. Therapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma: Current knowledge and future potential. J Cell Mol Med 2020; 25:618-628. [PMID: 33277810 PMCID: PMC7812297 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a biliary epithelial tumour that can emerge at any point in the biliary tree. It is commonly classified based on its anatomical site of development into intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PCC) and distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC), each of which is associated with varying patient demographics, molecular characteristics and treatment options. CCA patients have poor overall prognoses and 5‐year survival rates. Additionally, CCA is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, with surgical treatment restricted to early‐stage disease. Owing to an increase in the incidence of ICC, that of CCA is also on the rise, with a corresponding increase in the associated mortality, particularly in South America and Asia. Therefore, the development of an effective treatment is crucial to improve the survival of CCA patients. We aimed to systematically review the current understanding of advanced CCA treatment and discuss potential effective strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingxun Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Ziyan Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Pengyi Guo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ningbo Yinzhou NO.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Public Health and Management School, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines on Cholangiocarcinoma - Part II: Treatment. Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:1430-1442. [PMID: 32952071 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Currently, the only curative treatment for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is surgical resection, though this treatment is possible in less than 40% of patients. However, recent improvements in preoperative management have led to a higher number of patients who are candidates for this procedure. For unresectable patients, progress is ongoing in terms of locoregional and chemoradiation treatments and target therapies, especially in the definition of patient selection criteria. This is the second part of the Italian CCA guidelines, dealing with CCA treatment, that have been formulated in accordance with Italian National Institute of Health indications and developed according to the GRADE method and related advancements.
Collapse
|
21
|
Stereotactic body radiotherapy in the management of oligometastatic and recurrent biliary tract cancer: single-institution analysis of outcome and toxicity. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 146:2289-2297. [PMID: 32524292 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03285-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare malignancies arising from biliary system. Systemic therapy is the cornerstone for stage IV disease, with poor overall survival (OS). Evidence is lacking about safety and efficacy of local ablative treatments, such as surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the context of metastatic BTC (mBTC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes for a cohort of mBTC patients treated with SBRT for oligometastatic disease. Inclusion criteria were 1-5 distant metastases; SBRT with a dose/fraction of a least 5 Gy to a biological effective dose (BED) of at least 40 Gy considering an α/β of 10 Gy. Analyzed outcomes included local control (LC), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), PFS, and OS. RESULTS 51 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Primary tumor sites were intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (35%), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (31%), ampullary adenocarcinoma (20%), gallbladder adenocarcinoma (14%). 21 patients were treated on liver lesions, 17 on nodal metastasis, 5 patients on lung lesions, 4 patients on recurrence along the extrahepatic bile duct. After a median follow-up of 14 months median OS was 13.7 months, 1- and 2-year OS were 58% and 41%, respectively. Node and lung as metastatic sites were associated with a longer OS (p < 0.001). Median LC was 26.8 months, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was associated with longer LC (p = 0.036). Median DPFS was 11 months, with 1- and 2-year DPFS of 48% and 27.8%, respectively. Ten patients reported grade 1-2 toxicity and 2 cases of acute G3 biliary obstruction. CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is feasible in the context of mBTC. OS and PFS results are promising, considering that our patients were heavily pre-treated with systemic therapy. Patients with nodal or lung relapse have better prognosis. Distant relapses remain the main pattern of failure, but treatment of all metastatic sites seems to improve DMFS.
Collapse
|
22
|
Multimodality treatment in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:131-138. [PMID: 32395137 PMCID: PMC7207240 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.94582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Cholangiocarcinomas (CCs) are rare and highly malignant cancers. Although there are different treatment protocols for treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, we aimed to investigate a survival rate of patients with unresectable extrahepatic CCs (ECCs) receiving multimodality therapeutic protocol (MTP) (biliary drainage + external beam radiotherapy [EBRT] + brachytherapy and systemic chemotherapy). Similarly, we aimed to identify a relationship between survival time and associated factors in treatment outcome. Material and methods This retrospective study was performed on patients with ECC, who were referred to our university hospital between 2012 and 2015, and their imaging were diagnosed as unresectable. Patients underwent MTP including internal-external drainage catheter (F10-12) with insertion under fluoroscopy guidance, EBRT with 25-28 fractions and concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (Xeloda) 825 mg/m2 at the days of radiotherapy, followed by brachytherapy (BT) with iridium-192 (192Ir) or cobalt-60 (60Co) sources for 21 Gy in 3 consecutive days. Demographic variables, complications, laboratory tests, imaging findings, and survival time (OS - overall survival after diagnosis; CS - survival after catheter placement) were recorded. Results A total of 38 patients, with mean SD age = 58.08 (9.80) years, male = 22 (57.9%), were evaluated. According to Bismuth-Corlette classification, 15 (39.5%) were in stage IIIA, 5 (13.2%) were in stage IIIB, 10 (26.3%) were in stage IV, and 8 (21.2%) were undefined. Of those, 21 (55.3%), 15 (39.5%), and 17 (44.7%) were involved with liver parenchyma, great vessels, and regional lymph nodes, respectively. Mean SD of OS was 15.11 (8.10) months (median = 15; 95% CI: 13.25-16.69), and CS was 2-29 months (mean SD = 11.71 (7.29); median = 10; 95% CI: 10.05-13.37). Further analysis revealed a considerable decrease in OS and CS in those with an involvement of liver parenchyma, great vessels, regional lymph nodes, and Bismuth type IV. Conclusions Multimodality therapeutic approach in patients with inoperable ECCs could definitely improve their survival time and decrease complications. Survival time is significantly depending on tumor staging, gender, and involvement of liver parenchyma, great vessels, and regional lymph nodes.
Collapse
|
23
|
Mejia JC, Pasko J. Primary Liver Cancers: Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Surg Clin North Am 2020; 100:535-549. [PMID: 32402299 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2020.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of liver cancers has continued to increase over the past few decades and mortality related to liver cancer has increased by more than 2% annually since 2007. This article reviews the essential workup and treatment options necessary for general surgeons as they treat patients with primary liver cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C Mejia
- Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center, 101 West 8th Avenue, Suite 7050, Spokane, WA 99204, USA.
| | - Jennifer Pasko
- Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center, 101 West 8th Avenue, Suite 7050, Spokane, WA 99204, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Luterstein E, Cao M, Lamb JM, Raldow A, Low D, Steinberg ML, Lee P. Clinical Outcomes Using Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 5:189-195. [PMID: 32280818 PMCID: PMC7136637 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Previous studies have shown that stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) increases local control for cholangiocarcinoma, but gastrointestinal toxicity resulting from this treatment approach remains a concern. SABR using magnetic resonance–guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) may improve the therapeutic ratio of treatment for cholangiocarcinoma patients given the radiosensitivity of neighboring gastrointestinal organs. Methods Seventeen consecutive patients with unresectable locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma were treated with SABR using MRgRT between May 2015 and August 2017, subsequent to our previously reported series of patients treated using a standard Linac with cone beam computed tomography. Twelve patients presented with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and 5 patients with intrahepatic tumors. MRgRT-based SABR was administered at a median dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions. Results The median overall survival (OS) was 18.5 months, with a 1-year OS of 76% and 2-year OS of 46.1%. Three of the 17 patients progressed locally, yielding a 1-year local control of 85.6% and a 2-year local control of 73.3%. Although 12 of 17 patients experienced an acute grade 1 toxicity, none experienced acute grade 2 toxicities. One patient had an acute grade 3 duodenal ulcer with perforation (6%), and one patient had a late radiation-related toxicity grade 2 gastritis/colitis. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate diminished toxicity and excellent overall survival and local control. The clinical outcomes and safety profile of SABR delivered with MRgRT suggest that MRgRT is a promising treatment approach for treating cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Luterstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - James M Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ann Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sun J, Zhang T, Wang J, Li W, Zhang A, He W, Zhang D, Li D, Ding J, Duan X. Biologically effective dose (BED) of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was an important factor of therapeutic efficacy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (≤5 cm). BMC Cancer 2019; 19:846. [PMID: 31455251 PMCID: PMC6712687 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6063-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To explore the association between biologically effective dose (BED) and survival rates in Child-Pugh A classification (CP-A) small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS This retrospective study included 108 small HCC patients who were treated with SBRT between 2011 and 2014. The prescribed dose delivered to the tumor were 48Gy/8f, 49Gy/7f, 50Gy/5f and 54Gy/6f. The median biologically effective dose (BED10) of the total prescribed dose was 100Gy (76.8-102.6Gy). Factors associated with the survival rate were examined using the Cox proportion hazards model, and the factors associated with radiation-induced liver injury (RILD) were examined by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS For these patients, the median follow-up time was 42 months (6-77 months), and the 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.3, 89.8 and 80.6%, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 85.2, 70.1 and 60.6%, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year local control (LC) rates were 98.1, 96.2 and 95.1%, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year distant metastasis- free survival (DMFS) rates were 86.1, 72.8 and 61.2%. The OS, PFS and DMFS were significantly higher in the BED10 ≥ 100Gy group than in the BED10 < 100Gy group (OS: p = 0.020; PFS: p = 0.017; DMFS: p = 0.012). The PLT count was a predictive factor of RILD. CONCLUSIONS SBRT is a safe and effective option for CP-A HCC patients. A BED10 value greater than 100Gy and lower CP score are associated with improved OS and PFS. Additionally, the peripheral PLT count are predictive factors of RILD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Sun
- Radiation Oncology Center, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Beijing 302 Hospital), No. 100 Xi Si Huan Middle Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100039 China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Radiation Oncology Center, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Beijing 302 Hospital), No. 100 Xi Si Huan Middle Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100039 China
| | - Jia Wang
- Radiation Oncology Center, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Beijing 302 Hospital), No. 100 Xi Si Huan Middle Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100039 China
| | - Wengang Li
- Radiation Oncology Center, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Beijing 302 Hospital), No. 100 Xi Si Huan Middle Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100039 China
| | - Aimin Zhang
- Radiation Oncology Center, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Beijing 302 Hospital), No. 100 Xi Si Huan Middle Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100039 China
| | - Weiping He
- Radiation Oncology Center, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Beijing 302 Hospital), No. 100 Xi Si Huan Middle Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100039 China
| | - Dan Zhang
- Radiation Oncology Center, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Beijing 302 Hospital), No. 100 Xi Si Huan Middle Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100039 China
| | - Dong Li
- Radiation Oncology Center, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Beijing 302 Hospital), No. 100 Xi Si Huan Middle Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100039 China
| | - Junqiang Ding
- Radiation Oncology Center, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Beijing 302 Hospital), No. 100 Xi Si Huan Middle Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100039 China
| | - Xuezhang Duan
- Radiation Oncology Center, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Beijing 302 Hospital), No. 100 Xi Si Huan Middle Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100039 China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Cholangiocarcinoma: Optimizing Locoregional Control With Elective Nodal Irradiation. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 5:77-84. [PMID: 32051893 PMCID: PMC7004929 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To review our institutional experience of treating cholangiocarcinoma using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods and Materials A total of 40 patients with intrahepatic (n = 25) or perihilar (n = 15) cholangiocarcinoma treated with SBRT were retrospectively reviewed. SBRT was delivered in 1 to 5 fractions with median dose of 40 Gy. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate cumulative incidence of local in-field, local out-of-field, regional, and distant failure. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to calculate overall survival (OS). Toxicity was scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Results The median follow-up time was 18 months. The 1-year incidence of local in-field, local out-of-field, regional, and distant failure was 8%, 23%, 13%, and 22%, respectively. Median OS was 23 months and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 69% and 39%, respectively. Patients with perihilar tumors had a 1-year incidence of regional failure of 24% and worse OS (P = .013). Patients with regional failure were more likely to develop distant metastases, 32% versus 19% at 1 year (P = .11). Acute grade 3 + hepatobiliary toxicity developed in 15 patients (36%). Conclusions In this series of cholangiocarcinoma patients treated with definitive SBRT, patterns of failure reveal that regional failures are not insignificant, particularly for perihilar tumors. Elective nodal irradiation of regional lymphatics should be considered when using SBRT. A prospective study of elective nodal irradiation in patients with perihilar tumors would further clarify whether this approach improves outcomes without increasing hepatobiliary toxicity.
Collapse
|
27
|
Le Bon M, Lapeyre M, Moreau J, Bellière-Calandry A, Pezet D, Abergel A, Bellini R, Kwiatkowski F, Verrelle P, Martin F, Benoît C. [Tolerance of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for hepatic tumours]. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:385-394. [PMID: 31300328 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of stereotactic radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver tumours in Jean-Perrin cancer centre (Clermont-Ferrand, France) in terms of efficacy and safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between December 2013 and June 2016, 25 patients were included. Treatment was performed on a linear accelerator Novalis TX®. The prescription dose was 42 to 60Gy in three to five fractions. Local control at 1 year was evaluated with modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) and RECIST criteria. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 criteria. RESULTS Median follow-up was 10.5 months. Treatment tolerance was good with few side effects grade 3 or above, no acute toxicity and only one late toxicity. We have highlighted that hepatic artery haemorrhage was associated with the presence of a biliary prosthesis in contact with the artery (P=0.006) and in the irradiation field. There was no correlation with the dose delivered to the artery and hepatic artery haemorrhage. CONCLUSION Stereotactic radiation therapy for liver tumours allows a good local control with few secondary effects. Caution should be exercised when treating patients with biliary prostheses in the vicinity of the target volume because there is a risk of haemorrhage of the hepatic artery in contact with the prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Le Bon
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; Département de radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, promenade Léa-et-Napoléon-Bullukian, 69008 Lyon, France.
| | - M Lapeyre
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - J Moreau
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - A Bellière-Calandry
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - D Pezet
- Département de chirurgie digestive et hépatobiliaire, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, 1, rue Lucie-Aubrac, 63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - A Abergel
- Département d'hépato-gastroentérologie, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, 1, rue Lucie-Aubrac, 63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - R Bellini
- Département de radiologie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - F Kwiatkowski
- Département de physique médicale, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - P Verrelle
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - F Martin
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - C Benoît
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
The Combination of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy in Primary Liver Tumors. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2019; 2019:4304817. [PMID: 31182960 PMCID: PMC6512065 DOI: 10.1155/2019/4304817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Treatment recommendations for primary liver malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), are complex and require a multidisciplinary approach. Despite surgical options that are potentially curative, options for nonsurgical candidates include systemic therapy, radiotherapy (RT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is now in routine use for the treatment of lung cancer, and there is growing evidence supporting its use in liver tumors. SBRT has the advantage of delivering ablative radiation doses in a limited number of fractions while minimizing the risk of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) through highly conformal treatment plans. It should be considered in a multidisciplinary setting for the management of patients with unresectable, locally advanced primary liver malignancies and limited treatment options. Recently, the combination of immunotherapy with SBRT has been proposed to improve antitumor effects through engaging the immune system. This review aims at shedding light on the novel concept of the combination strategy of immune-radiotherapy in liver tumors by exploring the evidence surrounding the use of SBRT and immunotherapy for the treatment of HCC and CCA.
Collapse
|
29
|
Frakulli R, Buwenge M, Macchia G, Cammelli S, Deodato F, Cilla S, Cellini F, Mattiucci GC, Bisello S, Brandi G, Parisi S, Morganti AG. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180688. [PMID: 30673295 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been used in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CC) but toxicity and clinical results of SBRT in CC are still limited and sparse. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to analyze the results of SBRT in the setting of advanced CC. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library using the PRISMA methodology. Studies including at least 10 patients with diagnosis of advanced CC regardless of tumor site and other treatments were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were local control (LC) and toxicity rates. The ROBINS-I risk of bias tool was used. RESULTS 10 studies (231 patients) fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in this review. All but one study showed moderate to serious risk of bias. Median follow up was 15 months (range: 7.8-64.0 months). Pooled 1 year OS was 58.3% (95% CI: 50.2-66.1%) and pooled 2 year OS was 35.5% (95% CI: 22.1-50.1%). Pooled 1 year LC was 83.4%, (95% CI: 76.5-89.4%). The reported toxicities were acceptable and manageable with only one treatment-related death. CONCLUSION The role of SBRT in CC is not yet supported by robust evidence in literature. However, within this limit, preliminary results seem almost comparable to the ones of standard chemotherapy or chemoradiation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE SBRT seems effective in terms of LC with acceptable treatment-related toxicities. Therefore, SBRT can be considered a therapeutic option at least in selected patients with CC, possibly combined with adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rezarta Frakulli
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- 2 Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II", Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- 2 Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II", Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- 3 Medical Physic Unit, Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II", Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- 4 Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Gian C Mattiucci
- 4 Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Silvia Bisello
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Giovanni Brandi
- 5 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Cancer Research, University of Bologna , Bologna , Italy
| | - Salvatore Parisi
- 6 Unit of Radiotherapy, IRCCS"Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" San Giovanni Rotondo , Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lee J, Yoon WS, Koom WS, Rim CH. Efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy for unresectable or recurrent cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 195:93-102. [PMID: 30206644 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1367-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Non-surgical treatment including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have been used practically as alternative modalities for unresectable or recurrent cholangiocarcinoma (CC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of SBRT for such patients. METHODS Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library databases were searched systematically until October 2017. Primary endpoint was 1‑year local control (LC) rate; 1‑year overall survival (OS), response rates, and grade ≥3 toxicities were assessed as secondary endpoints. RESULTS Eleven studies (226 patients) were included. The prescribed median SBRT dose was 45 (range 30-55) Gy in 3-5 fractions. The pooled 1‑year LC rate was 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69.4-89.9%) in the studies using an equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2) ≥71.3 Gy2 and 74.7% (95% CI 57.1-86.7%) in the studies using an EQD2 <71.3 Gy2. The median OS was 13.6 (range 10-35.5) months. The pooled 1‑year OS rate was 53.8% (95% CI 44.9-62.5%) and the pooled 1‑year LC rate was 78.6% (95% CI 69.0-85.8%). Most common toxicity was duodenal ulcer and gastric ulcer in available studies, with the acute incidence of grade ≥3 of less than 10% and the late incidence of 10-20%. CONCLUSIONS SBRT was a feasible treatment option with respect to achieving a high LC for unresectable or recurrent CC. Gastrointestinal toxicity is acceptable, but remains an obstacle related to dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeongshim Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea (Republic of)
| | - Won Sup Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123 Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, 15355, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea (Republic of)
| | - Woong Sub Koom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)
| | - Chai Hong Rim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123 Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, 15355, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea (Republic of).
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nguyen NTA, Timotin E, Hunter R, Sur RK. High-dose rate intraluminal brachytherapy: An effective palliation for cholangiocarcinoma causing bile duct obstruction. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:625-629. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2017] [Revised: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
32
|
Koedijk MS, Heijmen BJM, Groot Koerkamp B, Eskens FALM, Sprengers D, Poley JW, van Gent DC, van der Laan LJW, van der Holt B, Willemssen FEJA, Méndez Romero A. Protocol for the STRONG trial: stereotactic body radiation therapy following chemotherapy for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, a phase I feasibility study. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020731. [PMID: 30327398 PMCID: PMC6196820 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), surgery is the only treatment modality that can result in cure. Unfortunately, in the majority of these patients, the tumours are found to be unresectable at presentation due to either local invasive tumour growth or the presence of distant metastases. For patients with unresectable CCA, palliative chemotherapy is the standard treatment yielding an estimated median overall survival (OS) of 12-15.2 months. There is no evidence from randomised trials to support the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for CCA. However, small and most often retrospective studies combining chemotherapy with SBRT have shown promising results with OS reaching up to 33-35 months. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study has been designed as a single-centre phase I feasibility trial and will investigate the addition of SBRT after standard chemotherapy in patients with unresectable perihilar CCA (T1-4 N0-1 M0). A total of six patients will be included. SBRT will be delivered in 15 fractions of 3-4.5 Gy (risk adapted). The primary objective of this study is to determine feasibility and toxicity. Secondary outcomes include local tumour control, progression-free survival (PFS), OS and quality of life. Length of follow-up will be 2 years. As an ancillary study, the personalised effects of radiotherapy will be measured in vitro, in patient-derived tumour and bile duct organoid cultures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval for the STRONG trial has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee of Erasmus MC Rotterdam, the Netherlands. It is estimated that all patients will be included between October 2017 and October 2018. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03307538; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel S Koedijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben J M Heijmen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ferry A L M Eskens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dave Sprengers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dik C van Gent
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luc J W van der Laan
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bronno van der Holt
- Department of Haematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - François E J A Willemssen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Shao F, Qi W, Meng FT, Qiu L, Huang Q. Role of palliative radiotherapy in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: population-based analysis with propensity score matching. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:1497-1506. [PMID: 29942151 PMCID: PMC6005320 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s160680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This population-based study evaluated the overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) benefit from palliative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods We queried The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for the patients with unresectable ICC diagnosed from 1973 to 2013. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to reduce the impact of the selection bias between the palliative RT group and the nonpalliative RT group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate the survival outcome before and after propensity score matching. OS and CSS were compared between patients with and without palliative RT using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Results A total of 4,027 of 15,803 patients diagnosed with ICC were included in this study. Of those, 847 (21%) patients underwent palliative RT, whereas 3,180 (79%) did not. In the unmatched population, patients treated with palliative RT had improved OS and CSS relative to those treated without palliative RT (adjusted HR =0.9065, 95% CI =0.8360-0.982, P=0.01735) and CSS (adjusted HR =0.8874, 95% CI =0.8160-0.9652, P=0.00532). After propensity score matching, palliative RT was associated with a significantly improved OS (adjusted HR =0.8544, 95% CI =0.7722-0.9453, P=0.00228) and CSS (adjusted HR =0.8563, 95% CI =0.7711-0.9509, P=0.0037). Conclusion Palliative RT seems to improve the prognosis of patients with unresectable ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Shao
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Qi
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Fu Tao Meng
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Lujun Qiu
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Huang
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Verma V, Kusi Appiah A, Lautenschlaeger T, Adeberg S, Simone CB, Lin C. Chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for unresected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: practice patterns and outcomes from the national cancer data base. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:527-535. [PMID: 29998018 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.01.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current guidelines recommend chemotherapy (CT) with or without radiotherapy (RT) for unresected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IC). Although there is currently lack of consensus, previous smaller studies have illustrated the efficacy of local therapy for this population. This investigation evaluated outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus CT alone in unresected IC using a large, contemporary national database. Methods The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for primary IC cases (2004-2013) receiving CT alone or CRT. Patients undergoing resection or not receiving CT were excluded, as were those with M1 disease or unknown M classification. Logistic regression analysis ascertained factors associated with CRT administration. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between both groups. Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed variables associated with OS. Results In total, 2,842 patients were analyzed [n=666 (23%) CRT, n=2,176 (77%) CT]. CRT was less likely delivered at community centers, in more recent time periods (2009-2013), to older patients, and in certain geographic locations. Median OS in the CRT and CT groups were 13.6 vs. 10.5 months, respectively (P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, poorer OS was associated with age, male gender, increased comorbidities, treatment at a community center, and treatment at earlier time periods (2004-2008) (P<0.05 for all). Notably, receipt of CRT independently predicted for improved OS (P<0.001). Conclusions As compared to CT alone, CRT was independently associated with improved survival in unresected IC. These findings support a randomized trial evaluating this question that is currently accruing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adams Kusi Appiah
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Tim Lautenschlaeger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Chi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Miften M, Vinogradskiy Y, Moiseenko V, Grimm J, Yorke E, Jackson A, Tomé WA, Ten Haken RK, Ohri N, Méndez Romero A, Goodman KA, Marks LB, Kavanagh B, Dawson LA. Radiation Dose-Volume Effects for Liver SBRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 110:196-205. [PMID: 29482870 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as an effective, noninvasive treatment option for primary liver cancer and metastatic disease occurring in the liver. Although SBRT can be highly effective for establishing local control in hepatic malignancies, a tradeoff exists between tumor control and normal tissue complications. The objective of the present study was to review the normal tissue dose-volume effects for SBRT-induced liver and gastrointestinal toxicities and derive normal tissue complication probability models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moyed Miften
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado.
| | | | - Vitali Moiseenko
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Jimm Grimm
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiology Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Wolfgang A Tomé
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Randall K Ten Haken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Nitin Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Alejandra Méndez Romero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Brian Kavanagh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Local Control After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 110:188-195. [PMID: 29395629 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantitatively evaluate published experiences with hepatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), to determine local control rates after treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumors and to examine whether outcomes are affected by SBRT dosing regimen. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified published articles that reported local control rates after SBRT for primary or metastatic liver tumors. Biologically effective doses (BEDs) were calculated for each dosing regimen using the linear-quadratic equation. We excluded series in which a wide range of BEDs was used. Individual lesion data for local control were extracted from actuarial survival curves, and data were aggregated to form a single dataset. Actuarial local control curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method after grouping lesions by disease type and BED (<100 Gy10 vs >100 Gy10). Comparisons were made using log-rank testing. RESULTS Thirteen articles met all inclusion criteria and formed the dataset for this analysis. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial local control rates after SBRT for primary liver tumors (n = 431) were 93%, 89%, and 86%, respectively. Lower 1- (90%), 2- (79%), and 3-year (76%) actuarial local control rates were observed for liver metastases (n = 290, log-rank P = .011). Among patients treated with SBRT for primary liver tumors, there was no evidence that local control is influenced by BED within the range of schedules used. For liver metastases, on the other hand, outcomes were significantly better for lesions treated with BEDs exceeding 100 Gy10 (3-year local control 93%) than for those treated with BEDs of ≤100 Gy10 (3-year local control 65%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary liver tumors provides high rates of durable local control, with no clear evidence for a dose-response relationship among commonly utilized schedules. Excellent local control rates are also seen after SBRT for liver metastases when BEDs of >100 Gy10 are utilized.
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinomas (CC) are rare tumors which usually present late and are often difficult to diagnose and treat. CCs are categorized as intrahepatic, hilar, or extrahepatic. Epidemiologic studies suggest that the incidence of intrahepatic CCs may be increasing worldwide. In this chapter, we review the risk factors, clinical presentation, and management of cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
39
|
Gkika E, Hallauer L, Kirste S, Adebahr S, Bartl N, Neeff HP, Fritsch R, Brass V, Nestle U, Grosu AL, Brunner TB. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for locally advanced intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:781. [PMID: 29162055 PMCID: PMC5699184 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3788-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the role of ablative radiotherapy doses in the treatment of hilar or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS Consecutive patients treated from 2007 to 2016 with CCC were evaluated. Local control and toxicities were assessed every 3 months according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0, respectively. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and progression free survival were calculated from SBRT. RESULTS Thirty seven patients with 43 lesions were retrospectively evaluated. The median dose delivered was 45 Gy (range 25-66 Gy) in 3-12 fractions, corresponding to a median equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD210) of 56 (range 25-85) Gy. The median follow up was 24 months. The OS at 1 year was 56% with a median OS of 14 (95% CI: 7.8-20.2) months from start of SBRT and 22 (95% CI: 17.5-26.5) months from diagnosis. Eight lesions progressed locally. The local control rate (LC) at 1 year was 78%. The median progression free survival was 9 months (95% CI 2.8-15.2) 21 patients progressed in the liver but out of field and 15 progressed distantly. SBRT was well tolerated. Three patients (9%) developed a Grade III bleeding. Seven patients developed a cholangitis, one due to progression and the other because of a stent dysfunction 2-21(median 8) months from SBRT. CONCLUSION In patients with locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma, SBRT is a local treatment option with an acceptable toxicity profile which warrants further investigation in prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
| | - Lukas Hallauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Sonja Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Nico Bartl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Hannes Philipp Neeff
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Ralph Fritsch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haematology, Oncology and Stem-Cell Transplantation, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Volker Brass
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Freiburg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Anca Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Freiburg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Thomas Baptist Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Freiburg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sangro B, Martínez-Urbistondo D, Bester L, Bilbao JI, Coldwell DM, Flamen P, Kennedy A, Ricke J, Sharma RA. Prevention and treatment of complications of selective internal radiation therapy: Expert guidance and systematic review. Hepatology 2017; 66:969-982. [PMID: 28407278 DOI: 10.1002/hep.29207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Selective internal radiation therapy (or radioembolization) by intra-arterial injection of radioactive yttrium-90-loaded microspheres is increasingly used for the treatment of patients with liver metastases or primary liver cancer. The high-dose beta-radiation penetrates an average of only 2.5 mm from the source, thus limiting its effects to the site of delivery. However, the off-target diversion of yttrium-90 microspheres to tissues other than the tumor may lead to complications. The most prominent of these complications include radiation gastritis and gastrointestinal ulcers, cholecystitis, radiation pneumonitis, and radioembolization-induced liver disease, which may occur despite careful pretreatment planning. Thus, selective internal radiation therapy demands an expert multidisciplinary team approach in order to provide comprehensive care for patients. This review provides recommendations to multidisciplinary teams on the optimal medical processes in order to ensure the safe delivery of selective internal radiation therapy. Based on the best available published evidence and expert opinion, we recommend the most appropriate strategies for the prevention, early diagnosis, and management of potential radiation injury to the liver and to other organs. (Hepatology 2017;66:969-982).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Diego Martínez-Urbistondo
- Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Lourens Bester
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of New South Wales St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | - Jose I Bilbao
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Douglas M Coldwell
- James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | - Patrick Flamen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrew Kennedy
- Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ricky A Sharma
- University College London, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gallbladder toxicity and high-dose ablative-intent radiation for liver tumors: Should we constrain the dose? Pract Radiat Oncol 2017; 7:e323-e329. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2017] [Revised: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 02/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
42
|
Treatment Selection and Survival Outcomes With and Without Radiation for Unresectable, Localized Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer J 2017; 22:237-42. [PMID: 27441741 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Most patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma present with locally advanced disease not amenable to surgical resection. For these inoperable patients, chemotherapy alone is generally considered the standard of care, with limited data regarding the role of radiotherapy. We used the National Cancer Database to investigate care patterns and the impact of radiation as a component of combined modality therapy on overall survival. METHODS We queried the National Cancer Database for patients with nonmetastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed from 2001 to 2011. Those undergoing surgery were excluded. All included patients were coded as having received chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimates and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to account for indication bias and mitigate heterogeneity between treatment groups. RESULTS One thousand six hundred thirty-six patients were identified with a median follow-up of 11.3 months. Median age was 63 years; 23% received combined modality therapy with radiation. Two-year overall survival for the entire cohort was 21%, and for the chemotherapy-alone and combined modality therapy groups, it was 20% versus 26%, respectively. On univariate analysis, overall survival was improved with combined modality therapy. On multivariate analysis, combined modality therapy remained significantly associated with improved overall survival, as did younger age, female sex, higher median income, lower comorbidity score, and earlier stage. Propensity score matched analysis confirmed the overall survival benefit associated with combined modality therapy. DISCUSSION In this largest reported analysis of combined modality therapy for localized, inoperable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, the addition of radiation to chemotherapy was associated with an improvement in overall survival. Three quarters of inoperable patients in the United States do not receive radiation. Survival remains relatively poor for all patients, and we enthusiastically support ongoing randomized trials seeking to incorporate radiotherapy as a possible means to improve outcomes.
Collapse
|
43
|
Shen ZT, Zhou H, Li AM, Li B, Shen JS, Zhu XX. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of stereotactic body radiation therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2017; 8:93541-93550. [PMID: 29212171 PMCID: PMC5706817 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been an emerging non-invasive treatment modality for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) when surgical treatment cannot be applied. The CyberKnife® is a SBRT system that allows for real-time tracking of the tumor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for ICC patients receiving this treatment. Twenty-eight patients with ICC were enrolled in the present study. The median prescription dose was 45 Gy (range, 36-54 Gy), fractionated 3 to 5 times with a 70% to 92% isodose line. Local control, overall survival, progression-free survival and toxicity were studied. The median follow-up time was 16 months (3-42 months). Based on modified Response Evaluation and Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), response rate and disease control rate of SBRT in ICC were 46.4% (13/28) and 89.3% (25/28), respectively. Median overall survival was 15 months (95% CI, 7.22-22.78). 1- and 2-years survival rates were 57.1% and 32.1%, and 1- and 2- years Progression-free Survival rates were 50.0 % and 21.4 %. Multivariate analysis revealed that number of lesions (solitary vs. multiple nodules), CA19-9 levels (≤37 U/mL vs. 37-600/>600) and TNM stage (AJCC stage) were independent prognostic factors for ICC patients treated with SBRT. Toxicity was mostly transient and tolerable. No greater than grade 3 toxicity was observed. These results suggested that CyberKnife SBRT might be a good alternative treatment for unresectable ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ze-Tian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Han Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ao-Mei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Bing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun-Shu Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xi-Xu Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Papafragkakis C, Lee J. Comprehensive management of cholangiocarcinoma: Part II. Treatment. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2017. [DOI: 10.18528/gii1500342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Charilaos Papafragkakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Keane FK, Hong TS. Role and Future Directions of External Beam Radiotherapy for Primary Liver Cancer. Cancer Control 2017; 24:1073274817729242. [PMID: 28975835 PMCID: PMC5937246 DOI: 10.1177/1073274817729242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of primary liver cancers continues to increase in the United States and worldwide. The majority of patients with primary liver cancer are not candidates for curative therapies such as surgical resection or orthotopic liver transplantation due to tumor size, vascular invasion, or underlying comorbidities. Therefore, while primary liver cancer is the sixth-most common cancer diagnosis worldwide, it represents the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Radiotherapy traditionally played a limited role in the treatment of primary liver cancer due to concerns over hepatic tolerance and the inability to deliver a tumoricidal dose of radiotherapy while still sparing normal hepatic parenchyma. However, the development of modern radiotherapy techniques has made liver-directed radiotherapy a safe and effective treatment option for both hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. An increasing body of literature has demonstrated the excellent local control and survival rates associated with liver-directed radiotherapy. These data include multiple radiotherapy techniques and modalities, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and charged particle therapy, including proton therapy. In this review, we discuss the development of liver-directed radiotherapy and evidence in support of its use, particularly in patients who are not candidates for resection or orthotopic liver transplantation. We also discuss future directions for its role in the management of primary liver cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence K. Keane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital,
Boston, MA, USA
| | - Theodore S. Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital,
Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sahai P, Kumar S. External radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the management of extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: available evidence. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20170061. [PMID: 28466653 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This review aims to summarize the currently available evidence for the role of external radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the management of cholangiocarcinoma. High locoregional disease recurrence rates after surgical resection alone for both the extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) provide a rationale for using adjuvant radiotherapy with chemotherapy. We performed a literature search related to radiotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma published between 2000 and 2016. The role of radiation is discussed in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, definitive and the palliative setting. Evidence from Phase II trials have demonstrated efficacy of adjuvant chemoradiation in combination with chemotherapy in EHCC. Locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma may be treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In the case of downsizing, assessment for resection may be considered. Brachytherapy offers dose escalation after external radiotherapy. Selected unresectable cases of cholangiocarcinoma may be considered for stereotactic body radiation therapy with neoadjuvant and/or concurrent chemotherapy. Liver transplantation is a treatment option in selected patients with EHCC and IHCC after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Stenting in combination with palliative external radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy provides improved stent patency and survival. Newer advanced radiation techniques provide a scope for achieving better disease control with reduced morbidity. Effective multimodality treatment incorporating radiotherapy is the way forward for improving survival in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puja Sahai
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Senthil Kumar
- 2 Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Patients with Unresectable or Medically Inoperable Cholangiocarcinoma. TUMORI JOURNAL 2017; 103:236-241. [DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The role of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with unresectable or medically inoperable cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear. We examined the efficacy and safety of SABR in this group of patients. Methods From January 2008 to December 2014, 15 patients with 17 lesions were included in this study. The lesions included 14 intrahepatic, 1 hilar, and 2 distal bile duct tumors. Three patients were classified as medically inoperable because of old age or multiple comorbidities. Tumors measured 0.8-13 cm (median, 3.6 cm). The median prescribed dose was 45 Gy delivered in 5 fractions over 5 consecutive days. Results The median follow-up period for surviving patients was 29.9 months. Objective responses were observed for 10 of 17 tumors (58.8%), including 3 complete responses (17.6%). The median survival duration was 12.6 months, and the 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 50.3% and 14.4%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year in-field failure-free rates were 61.5% and 30.8%, respectively. For patients with biologically effective doses (BEDs) exceeding 75 Gy10, the 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 58.3% and 33.3%, respectively, compared to 20.0% and 0%, respectively for those with BEDs lower than 75 Gy10. Radiation-induced liver disease did not develop in any patient. Acute toxicities were generally mild and tolerable. Conclusions Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy could be an alternative treatment for unresectable or medically inoperable cholangiocarcinoma. Further dose escalation may be considered to optimize local control.
Collapse
|
48
|
Michel R, Françoise I, Laure P, Anouchka M, Guillaume P, Sylvain K. Dose to organ at risk and dose prescription in liver SBRT. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2017; 22:96-102. [PMID: 28490979 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2016] [Revised: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is delivered in a curative intent to many primary and secondary tumors. Concerning liver metastasis, SBRT can be safely delivered using one to five fractions. An excellent local control is obtained with doses from 20 to 60 Gy. For primary hepatic tumors, results are also good, but the risk of hepatic toxicity related to liver pre-existent pathology must be taken into account. Radiation induced liver disease (RILD) is not frequent in its classical presentation, but modifications of liver enzymes are often observed. Other toxicities of SBRT on the duodenum, small bowel and biliary tract are also described. With respect to contraindications and dose limitations on surrounding structures, SBRT is well tolerated and takes place among curative treatment of liver tumors, as surgery, radiofrequency and embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rives Michel
- Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex, France
| | - Izar Françoise
- Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex, France
| | - Parent Laure
- Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex, France
| | - Modesto Anouchka
- Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex, France
| | - Portier Guillaume
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Kirzin Sylvain
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Hepatobiliary malignancies represent a heterogeneous group of diseases, which often arise in a background of underlying hepatic dysfunction complicating their local management. Surgical resection continues to be the standard of care for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC); unfortunately the majority of patients are inoperable at presentation. The aggressiveness of these lesions makes locoregional control of particular importance. Historical experience with less sophisticated radiotherapy resulted in underwhelming efficacy and oftentimes prohibitive liver toxicity. However, with the advent of extremely conformal and precise radiotherapy delivery, dose escalation to the tumor with sparing of surrounding normal tissue has yielded notable improvements in efficacy for this modality of treatment. Dose escalation has come in a variety of forms most notably as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and hypofractionated proton therapy. As radiation techniques continue to improve, their proper incorporation into the local management of hepatobiliary malignancies will be paramount in improving the prognosis of what is a grave diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Michael C Repka
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Keith Unger
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nantajit D, Trirussapanich P, Rojwatkarnjana S, Soonklang K, Pattaranutraporn P, Laebua K, Chamchod S. Clinical analysis of cholangiocarcinoma patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. Mol Clin Oncol 2017; 5:797-802. [PMID: 28105359 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2016.1072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or bile duct cancer is a rare cancer type in developed countries, while its prevalence is increased in southeast Asia, affecting ~33.4 men and ~12.3 women per 100,000 individuals. CCA is one of the most lethal types of cancer. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapies have been shown to have limited efficacy in improving the overall prognosis of patients. Radiotherapy has been reported to prolong the survival times of patients with certain characteristics. The present study retrospectively evaluated the medical records and follow-up data from 27 CCA patients who received radiotherapy at Chulabhorn Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) between 2008 and 2014. A total of 14 patients underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Of the 27 CCA patients, 14 had intrahepatic CCA, 2 had extrahepatic CCA and 11 had hilar CCA. The 2-year survival rate was 40.7%. Tumor resectability, clinical symptoms and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score were found to be indicative of patient prognosis. In addition, the planning target volume and biologically effective radiotherapy dose were of prognostic value; however, initial treatment response was ambiguous in predicting survival time. The findings of the present study suggested that the currently used radiotherapy protocols for CCA may require modification to improve their efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danupon Nantajit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | | | | | | | | | - Kanyanee Laebua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | - Sasikarn Chamchod
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|