Technique for sparing previously irradiated critical normal structures in salvage proton craniospinal irradiation

Proton Beam Therapy in the Reirradiation Setting of Brain and Base of Skull Tumour Recurrences

The therapeutic management of local tumour recurrence after a first course of radical radiotherapy is always complex. Surgery and reirradiation carry increased morbidity due to radiation-induced tissue changes. Proton beam therapy (PBT) might be advantageous in the reirradiation setting, thanks to its distinct physical characteristics. Here we systematically reviewed the use of PBT in the management of recurrent central nervous system (CNS) and base of skull (BoS) tumours, as published in the literature. The research question was framed following the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) criteria: the population of the study was cancer patients with local disease recurrence in the CNS or BoS; the intervention was radiation treatment with PBT; the outcomes of the study focused on the clinical outcomes of PBT in the reirradiation setting of local tumour recurrences of the CNS or BoS. The identification stage resulted in 222 records in Embase and 79 in Medline as of March 2023. Sixty-eight duplicates were excluded at this stage and 56 were excluded after screening as not relevant, not in English or not full-text articles. Twelve full-text articles were included in the review and are presented according to the site of disease, namely BoS, brain or both brain and BoS. This review showed that reirradiation of brain/BoS tumour recurrences with PBT can provide good local control with acceptable toxicity rates. However, reirradiation of tumour recurrences in the CNS or BoS setting needs to consider several factors that can increase the risk of toxicities. Therefore, patient selection is crucial. Randomised evidence is needed to select the best radiation modality in this group of patients.

Differential and Common Signatures of miRNA Expression and Methylation in Childhood Central Nervous System Malignancies: An Experimental and Computational Approach

Epigenetic modifications are considered of utmost significance for tumor ontogenesis and progression. Especially, it has been found that miRNA expression, as well as DNA methylation plays a significant role in central nervous system tumors during childhood. A total of 49 resected brain tumors from children were used for further analysis. DNA methylation was identified with methylation-specific MLPA and, in particular, for the tumor suppressor genes CASP8, RASSF1, MGMT, MSH6, GATA5, ATM1, TP53, and CADM1. miRNAs were identified with microarray screening, as well as selected samples, were tested for their mRNA expression levels. CASP8, RASSF1 were the most frequently methylated genes in all tumor samples. Simultaneous methylation of genes manifested significant results with respect to tumor staging, tumor type, and the differentiation of tumor and control samples. There was no significant dependence observed with the methylation of one gene promoter, rather with the simultaneous presence of all detected methylated genes' promoters. miRNA expression was found to be correlated to gene methylation. Epigenetic regulation appears to be of major importance in tumor progression and pathophysiology, making it an imperative field of study.

Reirradiation of Recurrent Pediatric Brain Tumors after Initial Proton Therapy

PURPOSE

The use of reirradiation for recurrent pediatric brain tumors has been increasing, but the effect of repeat radiation on critical cranial structures is unknown.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between July 2009 and May 2013, the records of 12 pediatric patients initially treated with proton therapy and then with reirradiation for recurrent brain tumors were retrospectively reviewed for toxicity and outcomes. Initial and repeat radiation dose distributions were deformed and merged to determine the maximum dose to 0.03 cm3 of the optic chiasm, optic nerves, spinal cord, brainstem, cochleae, pituitary, and uninvolved brain, and to 1 cm3 of the brainstem and brain on individual and composite plans. These dosimetric results were compared with auditory, neurocognitive, ophthalmologic, and endocrine outcomes to identify radiation-associated toxicities.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 3.5 years from diagnosis. Median ages at initial and repeat radiation were 4.6 and 6.7 years, respectively. All patients initially received proton radiotherapy to a median tumor dose of 55.8 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) (range, 45 to 60 Gy [RBE]). At progression, patients completed a second course of radiation to local fields (n = 7) or the craniospinal axis (n = 5) with a median tumor dose of 40 Gy (RBE) (range, 20 to 54 Gy [RBE]). Median progression-free survival was 22.7 months from the last day of the second radiation course. No patient developed central nervous system necrosis requiring treatment. Of evaluable patients, none developed radiation-related high-grade hearing loss (n = 11), visual pathway deficit (n = 10), or significant change in pre- and post-reirradiation full-scale intelligence quotient (n = 4). Of 11 evaluable patients, 4 (36.4%) developed secondary hypothyroidism and 1 (9.1%) developed growth hormone deficiency.

CONCLUSION

Repeat radiation for recurrent brain tumors after proton therapy may be performed in the pediatric population with acceptable short- and long-term toxicity.

Rapid RBE-Weighted Proton Radiation Dosimetry Risk Assessment

Proton therapy dose is affected by relative biological effectiveness differently than X-ray therapies. The current clinically accepted weighting factor is 1.1 at all positions along the depth-dose profile. However, the relative biological effectiveness correlates with the linear energy transfer, cell or tissue type, and the dose per fraction causing variation of relative biological effectiveness along the depth-dose profile. In this article, we present a simple relative biological effectiveness-weighted treatment planning risk assessment algorithm in 2-dimensions and compare the results with those derived using the standard relative biological effectiveness of 1.1. The isodose distribution profiles for beams were accomplished using matrices that represent coplanar intersecting beams. These matrices were combined and contoured using MATLAB to achieve the distribution of dose. There are some important differences in dose distribution between the dose profiles resulting from the use of relative biological effectiveness = 1.1 and the empirically derived depth-dependent values of relative biological effectiveness. Significant hot spots of up to twice the intended dose are indicated in some beam configurations. This simple and rapid risk analysis could quickly evaluate the safety of various dose delivery schema.