1
|
Costa P, Vale J, Fonseca G, Costa A, Kos M. Use of rectal balloon spacer in patients with localized prostate cancer receiving external beam radiotherapy. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100237. [PMID: 38322778 PMCID: PMC10846399 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the balloon spacer when used to reduce the radiation dose delivered to the rectum in prostate cancer patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy. Method A single center retrospective analysis including 75 PC patients with localized T1-T3a disease who received balloon spacer followed by EBRT. Pre- and post-implantation computed tomography (CT) scans were utilized for treatment planning for standard EBRT (78-81 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy fractions). Rectal dosimetry was assessed using DVHs, and toxicities were graded with CTCAE v.4. Results A median (IQR) prostate-rectum separation resulted in 1.6 cm (1.4-2.0) post balloon spacer implantation. Overall, 90.6 % (68/75) of patients had a clinically significant 25 % relative reduction in the rectal with a median relative reduction of 91.8 % (71.2-98.6 %) at rV70. Three (4.0 %) patients reported mild procedural adverse events, anal discomfort and dysuria. Within 90 days post-implantation, five patients (6.67 %) and 1 patient (1.33 %) reported grade 1 and grade 2 rectal toxicities (anal pain, constipation, diarrhea and hemorrhoids). Genitourinary (GU) grade 1 toxicity was reported in 37 patients (49.33 %), with only one patient (1.33 %) experiencing grade 2 GU toxicity. No grade ≥ 3 toxicity was reported. Conclusion Balloon spacer implantation effectively increased prostate-rectum separation and associated with dosimetric gains EBRT for PC stage T1-T3a. Further controlled studies are required to ascertain whether this spacer allows for radiotherapy dose escalation and minimizes gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Costa
- CUF Porto Instituto, Rua Fonte das Sete Bicas, 170 - Piso -1 – 4460-188 SENHORA DA HORA, Porto Portugal
| | - Joana Vale
- CUF Porto Instituto, Rua Fonte das Sete Bicas, 170 - Piso -1 – 4460-188 SENHORA DA HORA, Porto Portugal
| | - Graça Fonseca
- CUF Porto Instituto, Rua Fonte das Sete Bicas, 170 - Piso -1 – 4460-188 SENHORA DA HORA, Porto Portugal
| | - Adelina Costa
- CUF Porto Instituto, Rua Fonte das Sete Bicas, 170 - Piso -1 – 4460-188 SENHORA DA HORA, Porto Portugal
| | - Michael Kos
- Brachytherapy Radiation Specialists Summit Cancer, 6506 Regal Ct., Reno, NV 99223, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Narukawa T, Aibe N, Tsujimoto M, Shiraishi T, Kimoto T, Suzuki G, Ueda T, Fujihara A, Yamazaki H, Ukimura O. Increasing rectum-prostate distance using a hydrogel spacer to reduce radiation exposure during proton beam therapy for prostate cancer. Sci Rep 2023; 13:18319. [PMID: 37884786 PMCID: PMC10603046 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45557-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
SpaceOAR, a polyethylene-glycol hydrogel, reduces rectal radiation exposure during radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Previously, our group reported the modified technique of hydrogel insertion, which achieves greater separated distance at prostate-apex. This study aimed to investigate the impact of separated distance at prostate-apex and our modifier technique, on radiation exposure reduction during proton beam therapy (PBT). We included 330 patients undergoing PBT with the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 63 Gray (Gy) for localized prostate cancer, and categorized them into groups 0 (no spacer, n = 141), 1 (separated distance of spacer at the prostate-apex level < 7.5 mm, n = 81), and 2 (distance ≥ 7.5 mm, n = 108). The rectal volumes to receive 30-60 Gy (RBE), was estimated and described as Rectal V30-60 (ml) in 10 Gy increments. The Rectal V30-60 (ml) was significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1, and in group 1 than in group 0. After propensity score matching, the multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the most significant factor to reduce radiation exposure was our modified technique of hydrogel insertion. Therefore, using a hydrogel spacer to expand the prostate-rectum distance not only at prostate-mid to prostate-base level but also at the prostate-apex level can reduce the radiation exposure in PBT for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsukasa Narukawa
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Masashi Tsujimoto
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Takumi Shiraishi
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Takuya Kimoto
- Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Gen Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Takashi Ueda
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Atsuko Fujihara
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Osamu Ukimura
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kos M, Nurani R, Costa P, Dabkowski M, da Silva JVF, Zimberg S, Keane J. Multicenter, dual fractionation scheme, single core lab comparison of rectal volume dose reduction following injection of two biodegradable perirectal spacers. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14086. [PMID: 37376868 PMCID: PMC10562021 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A multicenter, double-arm, central core lab, retrospective study was performed to compare the rectal dosimetry of patients implanted with two injectable, biodegradable perirectal spacers, in conventional fractionation (CF), as well as ultrahypofractionation (UH) treatment plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty-nine patients were enrolled into the study in five centers: two centers in Europe, which implanted a biodegradable balloon spacer in a total of 24 subjects and three centers in the US, which implanted the SpaceOAR in 35 subjects. Anonymized CTs (pre and post-implantation) were reviewed by the central core lab. For VMAT CF plans rectal V50, V60, V70, and V80 were calculated. For UH plans, a corresponding rectal V22.6, V27.1, V31.37, and V36.25 were established representing 62.5%, 75%, 87.5%, and 100% of the 36.25 Gy prescribed dose. RESULTS For CF VMAT, a comparison between the balloon spacer and the SpaceOAR revealed a significant difference of 33.4% decrease in mean rectal V50 (71.9% vs. 38.5%, p < 0.001), 27.7% in mean rectal V60 (79.6% vs. 51.9%, p < 0.001), 17.1% difference in mean rectal V70 (84.1% vs. 67.0%, p = 0.001), and a significant difference of 3.0% (p = 0.019) in mean rectal V80 (87.2% vs. 84.2%). With UH analysis, the mean rectal dose reduction for the balloon spacer compared to the SpaceOAR was 79.2% and 53.3% for V27.1 (p < 0.001), 84.1% and 68.1% for V31.71 (p = 0.001), and 89.7% and 84.8% for V36.25 (p = 0.012), respectively. CONCLUSION Rectal dosimetry is more favorable for treatment with the balloon spacer compared with SpaceOAR. Further research, particularly in the context of a prospective randomized clinical trial design, is needed to assess the acute and late toxicity experience as well as physician satisfaction with achieving symmetrical implantation, and ease of use in light of increasing clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kos
- Northern NV Radiation OncologySpokaneWashingtonUSA
| | | | - Paulo Costa
- CUF Porto InstitutoRua Fonte das Sete BicasPortoPortugal
| | | | | | - Shawn Zimberg
- Advanced Radiation Centers of New YorkLake SuccessNew YorkUSA
| | - John Keane
- Advanced Radiation Centers of New YorkLake SuccessNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu C, Jiang S, Xu W, Chen X, He R, Deng K, Su H, Yin X, Su S, Liang T, Zhu L, Hou G, Zhang Y, Shi Y, Lv W, Liu L, Guo Z, Xu Y, Xu T, Wang K. Poly-l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone (PLCL) and poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA)/gelatin electrospun subacromial spacer improves extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition for the potential treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Int J Biol Macromol 2023:125522. [PMID: 37353124 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
Biodegradable subacromial spacer implantation has become practicable for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCT). However, the relative high degradation rate and inferior tissue regeneration properties of current subacromial spacer may lead to failure regards to long-term survival. It is reported that satisfactory clinical results lie in the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition after implantation. This study aims to develop a biological subacromial spacer that would enhance tissue regeneration properties and results in better ECM deposition. Physicochemical properties were characterized on both poly-l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone (PLCL) dip-coating spacer (monolayer spacer, MS) and PLCL dip-coating + Poly-l-Lactic Acid (PLLA)/Gelatin electrospun spacer (Bilayer Spacer, BS). Cytocompatibility, angiogenesis, and collagen inducibility were evaluated with tendon fibroblasts and endothelial cells. Ultrasonography and histomorphology were used to analyze biodegradability and surrounding ECM deposition after the implantation in vivo. BS was successfully fabricated with the dip-coating and electrospinning technique, based on the human humeral head data. In vitro studies demonstrated that BS showed a greater cytocompatibility, and increased secretion of ECM proteins comparing to MS. In vivo studies indicated that BS promoted ECM deposition and angiogenesis in the surrounding tissue. Our research highlights that BS exhibits better ECM deposition and reveals a potential candidate for the treatment of IRCT in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Liu
- Department of Joint and Trauma Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Lingnan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Shihai Jiang
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany
| | - Wenbin Xu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Lingnan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Joint and Trauma Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Ronghan He
- Department of Joint and Trauma Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Kunxue Deng
- Medprin Regenerative Medical Technologies Co., Ltd, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Hengxian Su
- Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China
| | - XiaoPeng Yin
- Department of Joint and Trauma Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Shouwen Su
- Department of Joint and Trauma Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Tangzhao Liang
- Department of Joint and Trauma Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Lei Zhu
- Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Gang Hou
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Lingnan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Yuanyuan Zhang
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Jiaozuo, Jiaozuo 454000, China
| | - Yi Shi
- Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 230022, China
| | - Wenhao Lv
- Department of Joint Surgery, Jiaozuo Coal Industry (Group) Co. Ltd. Central Hospital, Jiaozuo 454000, China
| | - Libiao Liu
- Medprin Regenerative Medical Technologies Co., Ltd, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Zeyue Guo
- Medprin Regenerative Medical Technologies Co., Ltd, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Yichun Xu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Lingnan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; Center for Bio-intelligent Manufacturing and Living Matter Bioprinting, Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518057, China; East China Institute of Digital Medical Engineering, Shangrao 334000, China.
| | - Kun Wang
- Department of Joint and Trauma Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hadigal SR, Gupta AK. Application of Hydrogel Spacer SpaceOAR Vue for Prostate Radiotherapy. Tomography 2022; 8:2648-2661. [PMID: 36412680 PMCID: PMC9680261 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8060221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Damage in the surrounding structures, including the rectum, due to unintended exposure to radiation is a large burden to bear for patients who undergo radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The use of injectable rectal spacers to distance the anterior rectum from the prostate is a potential strategy to reduce the dose of unintended radiation to the rectum. Hydrogel spacers are gaining increasing popularity in the treatment regimen for prostate cancer. After FDA approval of SpaceOAR, specialists are receiving an increasing number of referrals for hydrogel placements. In this paper, we review hydrogel spacers, the supporting clinical data, the best practices for hydrogel placement, and the risk of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Atul K. Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Rochester General Hospital, 1425 Portland Ave, Rochester, NY 14621, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Expanding access to rectal spacers in the United Kingdom: an examination of current evidence and an early review of data from a single institution. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s146039692200022x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Prostate cancer is a common malignancy with rising incidence in Western countries such as the United Kingdom. In localised disease there are a variety of curative treatment modalities. Patients can be referred for surgery, or for a combination of hormonal therapies and radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy). Each treatment option comes with side effects and in the case of radiotherapy one potential complication is bowel toxicity from radiation exposure. New technologies are being developed to try and mitigate the side effects and long term morbidity of this treatment, and to expand access to radiotherapy for patients who may previously have been excluded (i.e those with inflammatory bowel disease). Rectal Spacers are absorbable polyethylene glycol hydrogels injected into the perirectal space. These position the anterior rectal wall away from the prostate, subsequently minimising radiation dose to the rectum. Rectal Spacers have been introduced to National Healthcare Service (NHS) practice as part of the Innovation and Technology Payment (ITP) programme, however, their use is now under review.
Methodology and Results:
In this editorial we conduct a narrative review of some of the available evidence for Rectal Spacers, discuss their utilization within the NHS and the barriers to their wider use. We also explore preliminary dosimetry and quality of life data for use of Rectal Spacers in our centre where we have been part of the NHS ITP programme. Dosimetry data and Quality of life questionnaires were gathered from 22 treated patients and 11 matched controls. This indicated lower radiation doses to the prostate in those treated with Rectal Spacers.
Conclusion:
Rectal Spacers are an effective method to reduce radiation dose to the prostate in men treated for localised prostate cancer, however, their use remains under review in the NHS and there are a variety of barriers to upscaling their use.
Collapse
|
7
|
See AW, Bowden P, Wells G, Appu S, Lawrentschuk N, Liodakis P, Pandeli C, Aarons Y, Smyth LML, McKenzie DP. Dose-escalated radiotherapy to 82 Gy for prostate cancer following insertion of a peri-rectal hydrogel spacer: 3-year outcomes from a phase II trial. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:131. [PMID: 35879722 PMCID: PMC9316359 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02103-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dose-escalation to above 80 Gy during external beam radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer leads to improved oncological outcomes but also substantially increased rectal toxicity. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of escalating the dose to 82 Gy following insertion of a peri-rectal hydrogel spacer (HS) prior to radiotherapy. Methods This was a single arm, open-label, prospective study of men with localised prostate cancer who were prescribed a course of intensity modulated radiotherapy escalated to 82 Gy in 2 Gy fractions following insertion of the SpaceOAR™ HS (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA). Patients were prescribed a standard course of 78 Gy in 2 Gy fractions where rectal dose constraints could not be met for the 82 Gy plan. The co-primary endpoints were the rate of grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) adverse events (CTCAE, v4), and patient-reported quality of life (QoL) (EORTC QLQ-C30 and PR25 modules), up to 37.5 months post-treatment. Results Seventy patients received treatment on the study, with 64 (91.4%) receiving an 82 Gy treatment course. The median follow-up time post-treatment was 37.4 months. The rate of radiotherapy-related grade 3 GI and GU adverse events was 0% and 2.9%, respectively. There were 2 (2.9%) grade 3 adverse events related to insertion of the HS. Only small and transient declines in QoL were observed; there was no clinically or statistically significant decline in QoL beyond 13.5 months and up to 37.5 months post-treatment, compared to baseline. No late RTOG-defined grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity was observed, with no GI toxicity observed in any patient at 37.5 months post-treatment. Nine (12.9%) patients met criteria for biochemical failure within the follow-up period. Conclusions Dose-escalation to 82 Gy, facilitated by use of a hydrogel spacer, is safe and feasible, with minimal toxicity up to 37.5 months post-treatment when compared to rates of rectal toxicity in previous dose-escalation trials up to 80 Gy. Trials with longer follow-up of oncological and functional outcomes are required to robustly demonstrate a sustained widening of the therapeutic window. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12621000056897, 22/01/2021. Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Geoffrey Wells
- Urology Department, Eastern Health, Box Hill Hospital, Box Hill, Australia
| | - Sree Appu
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Cabrini Health, Malvern, Australia.,Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,EJ Whitten Centre for Prostate Cancer Research, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter Liodakis
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.,North Eastern Urology, Heidelberg, Australia
| | | | | | - Lloyd M L Smyth
- Icon Institute of Innovation and Research, South Brisbane, Australia
| | - Dean P McKenzie
- Research Development and Governance Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, Australia.,Department of Health Sciences and Biostatistics, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kundu P, Lin EY, Yoon SM, Parikh NR, Ruan D, Kishan AU, Lee A, Steinberg ML, Chang AJ. Rectal Radiation Dose and Clinical Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With and Without Hydrogel. Front Oncol 2022; 12:853246. [PMID: 35350564 PMCID: PMC8957858 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.853246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may experience gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. The hydrogel may mitigate this toxicity by reducing the rectal radiation dose. The purpose of this study is to compare rectal radiation dose and GI toxicity in patients receiving prostate SBRT with and without hydrogel. Methods Consecutive patients treated with SBRT between February 2017 and January 2020 with and without hydrogel were retrospectively identified. Baseline characteristics including prostate volume, rectal diameter, body mass index (BMI), age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, T-stage, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) usage were compared. Dosimetric outcomes (V40Gy, V36Gy, V32Gy, V38Gy, and V20Gy), rates of acute (≤90 days) and late (>90 days) GI toxicity, and PSA outcomes were evaluated for patients with and without hydrogel. Results A total of 92 patients were identified (51 hydrogel and 41 non-hydrogel). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Rectal V38(cc) was significantly less in the hydrogel group (mean 0.44 vs. mean 1.41 cc, p = 0.0002), and the proportion of patients with V38(cc) < 2 cc was greater in the hydrogel group (92% vs. 72%, p = 0.01). Rectal dose was significantly lower for all institutional dose constraints in the hydrogel group (p < 0.001). The hydrogel group experienced significantly less acute overall GI toxicity (16% hydrogel vs. 28% non-hydrogel, p = 0.006), while the difference in late GI toxicity trended lower with hydrogel but was not statistically significant (4% hydrogel vs. 10% non-hydrogel, p = 0.219). At a median follow-up of 14.8 months, there were no biochemical recurrences in either group. Conclusion Hydrogel reduces rectal radiation dose in patients receiving prostate SBRT and is associated with a decreased rate of acute GI toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Palak Kundu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Eric Y Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Stephanie M Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Neil R Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Alan Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Albert J Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Barros S, Roseira J, Caldeira P, Vaz AM, Guerreiro H, Codon O. Rectal Perforation by a Balloon Spacer: A Rare Cause of Rectal Perforation Addressed Endoscopically. GE-PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021; 28:416-419. [PMID: 34901449 DOI: 10.1159/000511647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most frequent cancer in men worldwide. Dose escalation is currently the standard of care for the treatment of prostate cancer with radiation therapy. However, the rectum tends to be the dose-limiting structure when treating prostate cancer, given its proximity. The injection of biodegradable spacers between the prostate and the rectum may optimize radiotherapy treatment delivery for patients with localized disease. Nevertheless, although the overall complication rate of spacers is marginal, the benefits of spacer technologies need to be evaluated against the complication risks such as rectum perforation/necrosis. We report a case of a 59-year-old man with a diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma for whom hormonal treatment followed by intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was proposed. A biodegradable and expandable balloon (BioProtect®) was injected into the perirectal space without detectable immediate complications. One month later, the patient presented with a 3-day persistent rectal bleeding. The investigation confirmed a rectal perforation by the balloon spacer system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sónia Barros
- Gastroenterology Department, Algarve University Medical Center, Faro, Portugal
| | - Joana Roseira
- Gastroenterology Department, Algarve University Medical Center, Faro, Portugal
| | - Paulo Caldeira
- Gastroenterology Department, Algarve University Medical Center, Faro, Portugal
| | - Ana Margarida Vaz
- Gastroenterology Department, Algarve University Medical Center, Faro, Portugal
| | - Horácio Guerreiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Algarve University Medical Center, Faro, Portugal
| | - Oscar Codon
- Radiation Oncology Department, Algarve Radio-Oncology Clinic, Faro, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Latorzeff I, Bruguière E, Bogart E, Le Deley MC, Lartigau E, Marre D, Pasquier D. Use of a Biodegradable, Contrast-Filled Rectal Spacer Balloon in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Dosimetric Gains in the BioPro-RCMI-1505 Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:701998. [PMID: 34513681 PMCID: PMC8427159 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.701998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/purpose Dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (RT) is effective in the control of prostate cancer but is associated with a greater incidence of rectal adverse events. We assessed the dosimetric gain and safety profile associated with implantation of a new biodegradable rectal spacer balloon. Materials/methods Patients scheduled for image-guided, intensity-modulated RT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer were prospectively included in the French multicenter BioPro-RCMI-1505 study (NCT02478112). We evaluated the dosimetric gain, implantation feasibility, adverse events (AEs), and prostate-cancer-specific quality of life associated with use of the balloon spacer. Results After a scheduled review of the initial recruitment target of 50 patients by the study's independent data monitoring committee (IDMC), a total of 24 patients (including 22 with dosimetry data) were included by a single center between November 2016 and May 2018. The interventional radiologist who implanted the balloons considered that 86% of the procedures were easy. 20 of the 24 patients (83.3%) received IMRT and 4 (16.7%) received volumetric modulated arc therapy (78-80 Gy delivered in 39 fractions). The dosimetric gains associated with spacer implantation were highly significant (p<0.001) for most variables. For the rectum, the median (range) relative gain ranged from 15.4% (-9.2-47.5) for D20cc to 91.4% (36.8-100.0) for V70 Gy (%). 15 patients (62%) experienced an acute grade 1 AE, 8 (33%) experienced a late grade 1 AE, 1 (4.2%) experienced an acute grade 2 AE, and 3 experienced a late grade 2 AE. No grade 3 AEs were reported. Quality of life was good at baseline (except for sexual activity) and did not markedly worsen during RT and up to 24 months afterwards. Conclusion The use of a biodegradable rectal spacer balloon is safe, effective and associated with dosimetric gains in modern RT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiotherapy, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Eric Bruguière
- Department of Imaging, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Emilie Bogart
- Methodology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | | | - Eric Lartigau
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.,CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| | - Delphine Marre
- Department of Physics, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.,CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vaggers S, Rai BP, Chedgy ECP, de la Taille A, Somani BK. Polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel rectal spacers for prostate brachytherapy: a systematic review with a focus on technique. World J Urol 2021; 39:1769-1780. [PMID: 32840655 PMCID: PMC8217059 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03414-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation dose to the rectum in prostate brachytherapy (PBT) can be reduced by the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel spacers. This reduces the rate of rectal toxicity and allows dose escalation to the prostate. Our objectives were to provide an overview of technique for injection of a PEG hydrogel spacer, reduction in rectal dosimetry, gastrointestinal toxicity and potential complications. METHODS We systematically reviewed the role of PEG hydrogel spacers in PBT using the Cochrane and PRISMA methodology for all English-language articles from January 2013 to December 2019. Data was extracted for type of radiotherapy, number of patients, type of PEG-hydrogel used, mean prostate-rectum separation, rectal dosimetry, acute and late GI toxicity, procedure-related complications and the technique used for hydrogel insertion. RESULTS Nine studies (671 patients and 537 controls) met our inclusion criteria. Of these 4 used DuraSeal® and 5 used SpaceOAR®. The rectal spacing achieved varied between 7.7-16 mm. Failure of hydrogel insertion was seen only in 12 patients, mostly related to failure of hydrodissection in patients undergoing salvage PBT. Where reported, the rectal D2 cc was reduced by between 21.6 and 52.6% and the median rectal V75% cc was reduced by between 91.8-100%. Acute GI complications were mostly limited to grade 1 or 2 toxicity (n = 153, 33.7%) with low levels of grade 3 or 4 toxicity (n = 1, 0.22%). Procedure-related complications were limited to tenesmus (0.14%), rectal discomfort (1.19%), and bacterial prostatitis (0.44%). CONCLUSIONS PEG hydrogel spacers are safe to insert. Gel insertion is easy, fast and has a low rate of failure. These studies convincingly demonstrate a significant reduction in rectal dosimetry. Although the results of spacers in reducing rectal toxicity is promising, these need to be confirmed in prospective randomised trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Vaggers
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - A. de la Taille
- Department of Urology, Robotic and Miniinvasive Surgery, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - B. K. Somani
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
In reply to Afkhami Ardekani M et al. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:355-357. [PMID: 33296002 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01720-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
13
|
Maybody M, Soliman MM, Yamada Y, Tahour D, Hsu M, Moskowitz CS, Katsoulakis E, Solomon SB. Temporary Organ Displacement to Escalate Radiation Dose to Retroperitoneal Tumors and Decrease Toxicity to Organs at Risk. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31:1578-1586. [PMID: 32861570 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate that temporary organ displacement (TOD) by drainage catheter placement and hydrodissection is feasible and reproducible for simulation (SIM) and stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between February 2010 and December 2018, 31 consecutive patients (20 men and 11 women; median age, 59 years; range 20-80 years) received both SIM and SBRT with TOD. The minimum required displacement was 10 mm between the gross tumor volume (GTV) and the organ at risk (OAR). Complete displacement was defined as the ability to displace the OAR from the GTV a minimum of 10 mm across the entire boundary. SIM was performed with hydrodissection on the same day. On the day of SBRT, displacement was reproduced by hydrodissection. Displacement was measured on computed tomography images of TOD, SIM, and SBRT. The drain was removed after SBRT. RESULTS TOD (hydrodissection) was significantly associated with successful displacement of the OAR from a GTV greater than 10 mm (median, 20 mm vs 4.1 mm, P < .001) and maintained displacement at SIM and SBRT (SIM: 29.4 mm vs 4.1 mm, P < .001; SBRT: 32.4 mm vs 4.1 mm, P < .001). The OAR-GTV boundary showed a median reduction of 35 mm (95% confidence interval, 27.5-37.5 mm) after TOD. TOD achieved complete displacement in 22 of 31 (71%) patients, and 25 of 31 (81%) patients were able to undergo single-fraction ablative SBRT. No patients developed procedure-related complications within 30 days. SIM and SBRT were successful without OAR toxicities within a median of 33 months (range, 3-92 months). CONCLUSIONS TOD with placement of drain and hydrodissection is technically feasible and safe and maintains displacement for SIM and SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid Maybody
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Mohamed M Soliman
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David Tahour
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Meier Hsu
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chaya S Moskowitz
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Evangelia Katsoulakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Wijk Y, Vanneste BGL, Jochems A, Walsh S, Oberije CJ, Pinkawa M, Ramaekers BLT, Vega A, Lambin P. Development of an isotoxic decision support system integrating genetic markers of toxicity for the implantation of a rectum spacer. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1499-1505. [PMID: 29952681 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1484156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous studies revealed that dose escalated radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients leads to higher tumor control probabilities (TCP) but also to higher rectal toxicities. An isotoxic model was developed to maximize the given dose while controlling the toxicity level. This was applied to analyze the effect of an implantable rectum spacer (IRS) and extended with a genetic test of normal tissue radio-sensitivity. A virtual IRS (V-IRS) was tested using this method. We hypothesized that the patients with increased risk of toxicity would benefit more from an IRS. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixteen localized prostate cancer patients implanted with an IRS were included in the study. Treatment planning was performed on computed tomography (CT) images before and after the placement of the IRS and with a V-IRS. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was calculated using a QUANTEC reviewed model for Grade > =2 late rectal bleeding and the number of fractions of the plans were adjusted until the NTCP value was under 5%. The resulting treatment plans were used to calculate the TCP before and after placement of an IRS. This was extended by adding the effect of two published genetic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP's) for late rectal bleeding. RESULTS The median TCP resulting from the optimized plans in patients before the IRS was 75.1% [32.6-90.5%]. With IRS, the median TCP is significantly higher: 98.9% [80.8-99.9%] (p < .01). The difference in TCP between the V-IRS and the real IRS was 1.8% [0.0-18.0%]. Placing an IRS in the patients with SNP's improved the TCP from 49.0% [16.1-80.8%] and 48.9% [16.0-72.8%] to 96.3% [67.0-99.5%] and 90.1% [49.0-99.5%] (p < .01) respectively for either SNP. CONCLUSION This study was a proof-of-concept for an isotoxic model with genetic biomarkers with a V-IRS as a multifactorial decision support system for the decision of a placement of an IRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonka van Wijk
- The D‐Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ben G. L. Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur Jochems
- The D‐Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sean Walsh
- The D‐Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cary J. Oberije
- The D‐Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Bram L. T. Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenómica-USC, CIBERER, IDIS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Philippe Lambin
- The D‐Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Leiker AJ, Desai NB, Folkert MR. Rectal radiation dose-reduction techniques in prostate cancer: a focus on the rectal spacer. Future Oncol 2018; 14:2773-2788. [PMID: 29939069 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. External beam radiotherapy by a variety of methods is a standard treatment option with excellent disease control. However, acute and late rectal side effects remain a limiting concern in intensification of therapy in higher-risk patients and in efforts to reduce treatment burden in others. A number of techniques have emerged that allow for high-radiation dose delivery to the prostate with reduced risk of rectal toxicity, including image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy, endorectal balloons and various forms of rectal spacers. Image-guided radiation therapy, either intensity-modulated radiation therapy or stereotactic ablative radiation therapy, in conjunction with a rectal spacer, is an efficacious means to reduce acute and long-term rectal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Leiker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390-9303, USA
| | - Neil B Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390-9303, USA
| | - Michael R Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390-9303, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
BioPro-RCMI-1505 trial: multicenter study evaluating the use of a biodegradable balloon for the treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer by intensity modulated radiotherapy; study protocol. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:566. [PMID: 29769060 PMCID: PMC5956854 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4492-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Prospective trials have demonstrated the advantage of dose-escalated radiotherapy for the biochemical and clinical control of intermediate risk prostate cancer. Dose escalation improves outcomes but increases risks of urinary and bowel toxicity. Recently the contribution of “spacers” positioned in the septum between the rectum and the prostate could improve the functional results of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). To date most of the evaluated devices were polyethylen glycol (PEG) and hyaluronic acid (HA). Men on the Spacer arm had decreased bowel toxicity and less decline in both urinary and bowel quality of life as compared to Control men in a randomized trial. Methods This is an interventional, multi-center study to evaluate the use of biodegradable inflatable balloon for patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer treated by IMRT (74 to 80 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction) with daily image guided radiotherapy. Discussion This multicenter prospective study will yield new data regarding dosimetric gain and implantation stages of Bioprotect balloon. Acute and late toxicities and quality of life will be registered too. Trial registration NCT02478112, date of registration: 15/06/2015.
Collapse
|
17
|
Vanneste BGL, van De Beek K, Lutgens L, Lambin P. Implantation of a biodegradable rectum balloon implant: tips, Tricks and Pitfalls. Int Braz J Urol 2018; 43:1033-1042. [PMID: 28338306 PMCID: PMC5734065 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: A rectum balloon implant (RBI) is a new device to spare rectal structures during prostate cancer radiotherapy. The theoretical advantages of a RBI are to reduce the high radiation dose to the anterior rectum wall, the possibility of a post-implant correction, and their predetermined shape with consequent predictable position. Objective: To describe, step-by-step, our mini-invasive technique for hands-free transperineal implantation of a RBI before start of radiotherapy treatment. Materials and Methods: We provide step-by-step instructions for optimization of the transperineal implantation procedure performed by urologists and/or radiation oncologists experienced with prostate brachytherapy and the use of the real-time bi-plane transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) probe. A RBI was performed in 15 patients with localised prostate cancer. Perioperative side-effects were reported. Results: We provide ‘tips and tricks’ for optimizing the procedure and proper positioning of the RBI. Please watch the animation, see video in https://vimeo.com/205852376/789df4fae4. The side-effects included mild discomfort to slight pain at the perineal region in 8 out of 15 patients. Seven patients (47%) had no complaints at all. Two patients developed redness of the skin, where prompt antibiotic regimen was started with no further sequelae. One patient revealed a temporary urine retention, which resolved in a few hours following conservative treatment. Further no perioperative complications occurred. Conclusion: This paper describes in detail the implantation procedure for an RBI. It is a feasible, safe and very well-tolerated procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben G L Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Kees van De Beek
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ludy Lutgens
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Towards a Clinical Decision Support System for External Beam Radiation Oncology Prostate Cancer Patients: Proton vs. Photon Radiotherapy? A Radiobiological Study of Robustness and Stability. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:cancers10020055. [PMID: 29463018 PMCID: PMC5836087 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10020055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a methodology which can be utilized to select proton or photon radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients. Four state-of-the-art competing treatment modalities were compared (by way of an in silico trial) for a cohort of 25 prostate cancer patients, with and without correction strategies for prostate displacements. Metrics measured from clinical image guidance systems were used. Three correction strategies were investigated; no-correction, extended-no-action-limit, and online-correction. Clinical efficacy was estimated via radiobiological models incorporating robustness (how probable a given treatment plan was delivered) and stability (the consistency between the probable best and worst delivered treatments at the 95% confidence limit). The results obtained at the cohort level enabled the determination of a threshold for likely clinical benefit at the individual level. Depending on the imaging system and correction strategy; 24%, 32% and 44% of patients were identified as suitable candidates for proton therapy. For the constraints of this study: Intensity-modulated proton therapy with online-correction was on average the most effective modality. Irrespective of the imaging system, each treatment modality is similar in terms of robustness, with and without the correction strategies. Conversely, there is substantial variation in stability between the treatment modalities, which is greatly reduced by correction strategies. This study provides a ‘proof-of-concept’ methodology to enable the prospective identification of individual patients that will most likely (above a certain threshold) benefit from proton therapy.
Collapse
|
19
|
King RB, Osman SO, Fairmichael C, Irvine DM, Lyons CA, Ravi A, O'Sullivan JM, Hounsell AR, Mitchell DM, McGarry CK, Jain S. Efficacy of a rectal spacer with prostate SABR-first UK experience. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170672. [PMID: 29182384 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study assessed the use of implanted hydrogel rectal spacers for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy-volumetric modulated arc therapy (SABR-VMAT) patients, investigating practicality, dosimetric impact, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and early toxicity. METHODS Data from the first 6 patients treated within a prostate SABR and rectal spacer trial were examined to determine spacer insertion tolerability, resultant changes in treatment planning and dosimetry and early toxicity effects. CT scans acquired prior to spacer insertion were used to generate SABR plans which were compared to post-insertion plans. Plans were evaluated for target coverage, conformity, and organs at risk doses with NTCPs also determined from resultant dose fluences. Early toxicity data were also collected. RESULTS All patients had successful spacer insertion under local anaesthetic with maximal Grade 1 toxicity. All plans were highly conformal, with no significant differences in clinical target volume dose coverage between pre- and post-spacer plans. Substantial improvements in rectal dose metrics were observed in post-spacer plans, e.g. rectal volume receiving 36 Gy reduced by ≥42% for all patients. Median NTCP for Grade 2 + rectal bleeding significantly decreased from 4.9 to 0.8% with the use of a rectal spacer (p = 0.031). To date, two episodes of acute Grade 1 proctitis have been reported following treatment. CONCLUSION The spacer resulted in clinically and statistically significant reduction in rectal doses for all patients. Advances in knowledge: This is one of the first studies to investigate the efficacy of a hydrogel spacer in prostate SABR treatments. Observed dose sparing of the rectum is predicted to result in meaningful clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond B King
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,2 Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Sarah Os Osman
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,2 Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Ciaran Fairmichael
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,3 Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Denise M Irvine
- 2 Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Ciara A Lyons
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,3 Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland.,4 Department of Clinical Oncology, North West Cancer Centre, Altnagelvin Area Hospital , Londonderry , Northern Ireland
| | - Ananth Ravi
- 5 Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre , Toronto , Canada
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,3 Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Alan R Hounsell
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,2 Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Darren M Mitchell
- 3 Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Conor K McGarry
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,2 Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Suneil Jain
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,3 Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Development of a virtual spacer to support the decision for the placement of an implantable rectum spacer for prostate cancer radiotherapy: Comparison of dose, toxicity and cost-effectiveness. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:107-112. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Revised: 07/12/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
21
|
Hydrogel spacer distribution within the perirectal space in patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Impact of spacer symmetry on rectal dose reduction and the clinical consequences of hydrogel infiltration into the rectal wall. Pract Radiat Oncol 2017; 7:195-202. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2016] [Revised: 10/10/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
22
|
Zaorsky NG, Showalter TN, Ezzell GA, Nguyen PL, Assimos DG, D'Amico AV, Gottschalk AR, Gustafson GS, Keole SR, Liauw SL, Lloyd S, McLaughlin PW, Movsas B, Prestidge BR, Taira AV, Vapiwala N, Davis BJ. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer, part I of II. Adv Radiat Oncol 2016; 2:62-84. [PMID: 28740916 PMCID: PMC5514238 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2016.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Gary A Ezzell
- Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (research author, contributing)
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (panel vice-chair)
| | - Dean G Assimos
- University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama (American Urological Association)
| | - Anthony V D'Amico
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (American Society of Clinical Oncology)
| | | | | | | | | | - Shane Lloyd
- Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | | | | | - Al V Taira
- Mills Peninsula Hospital, San Mateo, California
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Whalley D, Hruby G, Alfieri F, Kneebone A, Eade T. SpaceOAR Hydrogel in Dose-escalated Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: Rectal Dosimetry and Late Toxicity. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2016; 28:e148-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2015] [Revised: 04/21/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
24
|
Basu A, Haim-Zada M, Domb AJ. Biodegradable inflatable balloons for tissue separation. Biomaterials 2016; 105:109-116. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Revised: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
25
|
Trifiletti DM, Garda AE, Showalter TN. Implanted spacer approaches for pelvic radiation therapy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2016; 13:633-40. [DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1195682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M. Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Allison E. Garda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Timothy N. Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Decision analysis model evaluating the cost of a temporary hydrogel rectal spacer before prostate radiation therapy to reduce the incidence of rectal complications. Urol Oncol 2016; 34:291.e19-26. [PMID: 27038698 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2015] [Revised: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 02/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We conducted a decision analysis to evaluate the cost effectiveness of a newly Food and Drug Administration approved rectal spacer gel (SpaceOAR, Augmenix) for the reduction of rectal toxicity of prostate radiation therapy (RT). METHODS A decision tree model (TreeAge Pro) was used to compare the strategy of pretherapy placement of a spacing hydrogel before RT to RT alone. The model compared costs associated with rectal complications because of rectal toxicity over a 10-year period across 3 different RT modalities. Rectal toxicity rates were estimated from studies on conformal RT dose escalation, high-dose stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and low-dose SBRT. Rectal toxicity reduction rates (baseline reduction 70%) were estimated from recently published 15 month data using a rectal spacer. Direct and indirect cost estimates for established grades of rectal toxicity were based on national and institutional costs. Reduction in short-term complications were assumed to carry forward to a reduction in long-term toxicity. One-way and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS The overall standard management cost for conformal RT was $3,428 vs. $3,946 with rectal spacer for an incremental cost of $518 over 10 years. A 1-way sensitivity analyses showed the breakeven cost of spacer at $2,332 or a breakeven overall risk reduction of 86% at a cost of $2,850. For high-dose SBRT, spacer was immediately cost effective with a savings of $2,640 and breakeven risk reduction at 36%. However, 2-way spacer cost to risk reduction sensitivity analyses were performed. CONCLUSION The use of a rectal spacer for conformal RT results in a marginal cost increase with a significant reduction in rectal toxicity assuming recently published 15 month rectal toxicity reduction is maintained over 10 years. For high-dose SBRT it was cost effective. Further studies would be necessary to validate the long-term benefits of rectal spacers.
Collapse
|
27
|
Mariados N, Sylvester J, Shah D, Karsh L, Hudes R, Beyer D, Kurtzman S, Bogart J, Hsi RA, Kos M, Ellis R, Logsdon M, Zimberg S, Forsythe K, Zhang H, Soffen E, Francke P, Mantz C, Rossi P, DeWeese T, Hamstra DA, Bosch W, Gay H, Michalski J. Hydrogel Spacer Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pivotal Trial: Dosimetric and Clinical Effects of Perirectal Spacer Application in Men Undergoing Prostate Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 92:971-977. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 195] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2015] [Revised: 04/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
28
|
Abstract
Definitive radiotherapy is a well-recognized treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Rectum toxicity is the dose-limiting toxicity. Dose-volume correlations have been reported in many studies. The application of a spacer to increase the distance between the prostate and anterior rectal wall is an innovative technique, considerably reducing the dose to the rectum. Hyaluronic acid, human collagen, an inflatable balloon or hydrogel are potential materials to create the desired effect. The number of clinical studies is rapidly increasing. Well-tolerated injection or implantation techniques and low rectal treatment-related toxicity have been demonstrated in prospective studies. Long-term clinical results and the results of randomized studies are needed to better define the beneficial effect for the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Pinkawa
- *Department of Radiation Oncology, Rheinisch-Westfaelische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52057 Aachen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mok G, Benz E, Vallee JP, Miralbell R, Zilli T. Optimization of radiation therapy techniques for prostate cancer with prostate-rectum spacers: a systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 90:278-88. [PMID: 25304788 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2014] [Revised: 05/12/2014] [Accepted: 06/18/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Dose-escalated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer improves disease control but is also associated with worse rectal toxicity. A spacer placed between the prostate and rectum can be used to displace the anterior rectal wall outside of the high-dose radiation regions and potentially minimize radiation-induced rectal toxicity. This systematic review focuses on the published data regarding the different types of commercially available prostate-rectum spacers. Dosimetric results and preliminary clinical data using prostate-rectum spacers in patients with localized prostate cancer treated by curative radiation therapy are compared and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Mok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Intégré de Cancérologie de Laval, Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada; Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology, and Nuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Eileen Benz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Paul Vallee
- Department of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Raymond Miralbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Eminowicz G, Dean C, Shoffren O, Macdougall N, Wells P, Muirhead R. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to prostate and pelvic nodes-is pelvic lymph node coverage adequate with fiducial-based image-guided radiotherapy? Br J Radiol 2014; 87:20130696. [PMID: 24646126 PMCID: PMC4075533 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2013] [Revised: 01/20/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There remains concern regarding the use of fiducial-based image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer also undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to pelvic nodes. By a retrospective study, we aim to ascertain the impact of the use of fiducial-based IGRT on lymph node planned target volume (PTV) coverage. METHODS 30 consecutive IMRT prostate and pelvic node plans were reviewed, and dose was recalculated with 1-mm increment movements in anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, right and left directions up to 10 mm. All patients were treated with a full bladder after drinking 450-750 ml of water and empty rectum with the use of sodium citrate enemas daily. Dose-volume histogram parameters were recorded at each position, specifically nodal PTV V95%, V99% and V100%. A local IGRT database was used to identify the likelihood of a particular bony to fiducial offset in all directions. The combined data were used to calculate the percentage risk of underdosing the lymph node PTV on any given fraction. RESULTS The likelihood of an offset in the left, right and anterior directions occurring and resulting in a failure to cover the PTV was <0.25%. The likelihood of a posterior offset occurring and resulting in inadequate coverage was slightly higher but remained <1%. CONCLUSION This study confirms the safety of fiducial-based image-guided IMRT (IG-IMRT) with a strict bowel and bladder protocol, allowing a reduction of the clinical target volume to PTV margin of the prostate volume and consequent reduction in rectal toxicity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This study strengthens the evidence supporting the safe implementation of fiducial-based IG-IMRT treating the prostate and pelvic nodes in high-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Eminowicz
- Department of Radiotherapy, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
[Prostate-rectum spacers: optimization of prostate cancer irradiation]. Cancer Radiother 2014; 18:215-21; quiz 243-4, 247. [PMID: 24746454 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2013] [Revised: 01/03/2014] [Accepted: 03/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
In the curative radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer, improvements in biochemical control observed with dose escalation have been counterbalanced by an increase in radiation-induced toxicity. The injection of biodegradable spacers between prostate and rectum represents a new frontier in the optimization of radiotherapy treatments for patients with localized disease. Transperineal injection of different types of spacers under transrectal ultrasound guidance allows creating a 7-to-20 mm additional space between the prostate and the anterior rectal wall lasting 3 to 12 months. Dosimetrically, a relative reduction in the rectal volume receiving at least 70 Gy (V70) in the order of 43% to 84% is observed with all types of spacers, regardless of the radiotherapy technique used. Preliminary clinical results show for all spacers a good tolerance and a possible reduction in the acute side effects rate. The aim of the present systematic review of the literature is to report on indications as well as dosimetric and clinical advantages of the different types of prostate-rectum spacers commercially available (hydrogel, hyaluronic acid, collagen, biodegradable balloon).
Collapse
|
32
|
Strom TJ, Wilder RB, Fernandez DC, Mellon EA, Saini AS, Hunt DC, Pow-Sang JM, Spiess PE, Sexton WJ, Poch MA, Biagioli MC. A dosimetric study of polyethylene glycol hydrogel in 200 prostate cancer patients treated with high-dose rate brachytherapy±intensity modulated radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2014; 111:126-31. [PMID: 24746567 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2013] [Revised: 02/08/2014] [Accepted: 02/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We sought to analyze the effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel on rectal doses in prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between July 2009 and April 2013, we treated 200 clinically localized prostate cancer patients with high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy±intensity modulated radiation therapy. Half of the patients received a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided transperineal injection of 10mL PEG hydrogel (DuraSeal™ Spinal Sealant System; Covidien, Mansfield, MA) in their anterior perirectal fat immediately prior to the first HDR brachytherapy treatment and 5mL PEG hydrogel prior to the second HDR brachytherapy treatment. Prostate, rectal, and bladder doses and prostate-rectal distances were calculated based upon treatment planning CT scans. RESULTS There was a success rate of 100% (100/100) with PEG hydrogel implantation. PEG hydrogel significantly increased the prostate-rectal separation (mean±SD, 12±4mm with gel vs. 4±2mm without gel, p<0.001) and significantly decreased the mean rectal D2 mL (47±9% with gel vs. 60±8% without gel, p<0.001). Gel decreased rectal doses regardless of body mass index (BMI). CONCLUSIONS PEG hydrogel temporarily displaced the rectum away from the prostate by an average of 12mm and led to a significant reduction in rectal radiation doses, regardless of BMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobin J Strom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Richard B Wilder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Daniel C Fernandez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Eric A Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Amarjit S Saini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Dylan C Hunt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Julio M Pow-Sang
- Department of Urology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Phillipe E Spiess
- Department of Urology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Wade J Sexton
- Department of Urology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Michael A Poch
- Department of Urology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Matthew C Biagioli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ng M, Brown E, Williams A, Chao M, Lawrentschuk N, Chee R. Fiducial markers and spacers in prostate radiotherapy: current applications. BJU Int 2014; 113 Suppl 2:13-20. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.12624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ng
- Radiation Oncology Victoria; Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Elizabeth Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Princess Alexandra Hospital; Brisbane QLD Australia
| | - Andrew Williams
- Department of Urology; Auckland City Hospital; Auckland New Zealand
| | - Michael Chao
- Radiation Oncology Victoria; Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Surgery and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research; Austin Hospital; University of Melbourne; Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Raphael Chee
- Genesis Cancer Care Western Australia; Joondalup WA Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Improved long-term outcomes with IMRT: is it better technology or better physics? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 87:867-8. [PMID: 24267964 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2013] [Revised: 09/05/2013] [Accepted: 09/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
35
|
de Castro Abreu AL, Ma Y, Shoji S, Marien A, Leslie S, Gill I, Ukimura O. Denonvilliers' space expansion by transperineal injection of hydrogel: implications for focal therapy of prostate cancer. Int J Urol 2013; 21:416-8. [PMID: 24118183 DOI: 10.1111/iju.12290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2013] [Accepted: 08/27/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
We developed and assessed a technique of: (i) expanding Denonvilliers' space by hydrogel (polyethylene glycol) during focal cryoabation; and (ii) temperature mapping to ensure protection of the rectal wall. In a fresh cadaver, 20 cc of hydrogel was injected transperineally into Denonvilliers' space under transrectal ultrasound guidance. Successful expansion of Denonvilliers' space was achieved with a range of 9-11 mm thickness covering the entire posterior prostate surface. Two freeze-thaw cycles were used to expand the iceball reaching the rectal wall as an end-point. Intraoperative transrectal ultrasound monitoring and temperature mapping in Denonvilliers' space by multiple thermocouples documented real-time iceball expansion up to 10 mm beyond the prostate, and safety in protecting the rectal wall from thermal injury. The lowest temperatures of the thermocouples with a distance of 0 mm, 5 mm and 10 mm from the prostate were: -35°C, -18°C and 0°C (P < 0.001), respectively. In gross and microscopic examination, the hydrogel mass measured 11 × 40 × 34 mm, which was identical to the intraoperative transrectal ultrasound measurements, there was no infiltration of the hydrogel into the rectal wall or prostate and no injury to the pelvic organs. In conclusion, the expansion of Denonvilliers' space by transperineal injection of hydrogel is feasible and a promising technique to facilitate energy-based focal therapy of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Luis de Castro Abreu
- USC Institute of Urology, Center for Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Katsoulakis E, Solomon SB, Maybody M, Housman D, Niyazov G, Riaz N, Lovelock M, Spratt DE, Erinjeri JP, Thornton RH, Yamada Y. Temporary organ displacement coupled with image-guided, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for paraspinal tumors. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8:150. [PMID: 23800073 PMCID: PMC3702493 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2012] [Accepted: 06/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the feasibility and dosimetric improvements of a novel technique to temporarily displace critical structures in the pelvis and abdomen from tumor during high-dose radiotherapy. Methods Between 2010 and 2012, 11 patients received high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy with temporary organ displacement (TOD) at our institution. In all cases, imaging revealed tumor abutting critical structures. An all-purpose drainage catheter was introduced between the gross tumor volume (GTV) and critical organs at risk (OAR) and infused with normal saline (NS) containing 5-10% iohexol. Radiation planning was performed with the displaced OARs and positional reproducibility was confirmed with cone-beam CT (CBCT). Patients were treated within 36 hours of catheter placement. Radiation plans were re-optimized using pre-TOD OARs to the same prescription and dosimetrically compared with post-TOD plans. A two-tailed permutation test was performed on each dosimetric measure. Results The bowel/rectum was displaced in six patients and kidney in four patients. One patient was excluded due to poor visualization of the OAR; thus 10 patients were analyzed. A mean of 229 ml (range, 80–1000) of NS 5-10% iohexol infusion resulted in OAR mean displacement of 17.5 mm (range, 7–32). The median dose prescribed was 2400 cGy in one fraction (range, 2100–3000 in 3 fractions). The mean GTV Dmin and PTV Dmin pre- and post-bowel TOD IG-IMRT dosimetry significantly increased from 1473 cGy to 2086 cGy (p=0.015) and 714 cGy to 1214 cGy (p=0.021), respectively. TOD increased mean PTV D95 by 27.14% of prescription (p=0.014) while the PTV D05 decreased by 9.2% (p=0.011). TOD of the bowel resulted in a 39% decrease in mean bowel Dmax (p=0.008) confirmed by CBCT. TOD of the kidney significantly decreased mean kidney dose and Dmax by 25% (0.022). Conclusions TOD was well tolerated, reproducible, and facilitated dose escalation to previously radioresistant tumors abutting critical structures while minimizing dose to OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelia Katsoulakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|