Use of activated recombinant factor VII for severe coagulopathy post ventricular assist device or orthotopic heart transplant

Trends in the Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII and Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Heart Transplant Patients in Virginia

OBJECTIVES

To explore trends in intraoperative procoagulant factor concentrate use in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) in Virginia. Secondarily, to evaluate their association with postoperative thrombosis.

DESIGN

Patients who underwent HTx were identified using a statewide database. Trends in off-label recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) use and on-label and off-label prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) use were tested using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for an association between procoagulant factor concentrate administration and thrombosis.

SETTING

Virginia hospitals performing HTx.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults undergoing HTx between 2012 and 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among 899 patients who required HTx, 100 (11.1%) received off-label rFVIIa, 69 (7.7%) received on-label PCC, and 80 (8.9%) received off-label PCC. There was a downward trend in the use of rFVIIa over the 10-year period (p = 0.04). There was no trend in on-label PCC use (p = 0.12); however, there was an increase in off-label PCC use (p < 0.001). Patients who received rFVIIa were transfused more and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001). Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with increased thrombotic risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.12-3.29; p = 0.02), whereas on-label and off-label PCC use had no association with thrombosis (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49-1.96, p = 0.96 for on-label use; and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.30, p = 0.20 for off-label use).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of rFVIIa in HTx decreased over the past decade, whereas off-label PCC use increased. Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with thrombosis; however, patients who received rFVIIa were more severely ill, and risk adjustment may have been incomplete.

Survival After Cardiac Transplantation in Adults With Single-Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Without large-scale analyses of adults with single-ventricle congenital heart disease (CHD) undergoing heart transplantation, little evidence exists to guide listing practices and patient counseling.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate survival after heart transplantation in adults with single and biventricular CHD and compare it to that of non-CHD transplant recipients.

METHODS

In this 15-year (2005-2020) retrospective analysis, outcome-blinded investigators used probability-linkage to merge the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data sets.

RESULTS

Of 382 adult (≥18 years of age) heart transplant recipients with CHD, 185 (48%) had single-ventricle physiology. Compared to biventricular CHD, single-ventricle patients showed significantly reduced survival at 1 (80% vs 91%; HR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.40-4.49; P = 0.002) and 10 years (54% vs 71%; HR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.38-3.18; P < 0.001). Among patients who survived the first post-transplantation year, biventricular CHD patients exhibited similar 10-year survival as single-ventricle patients, except for those with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (79% vs 71%; HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 0.85-2.92; P = 0.15). Additionally, biventricular CHD transplant recipients showed significantly better 10-year conditional survival compared to their non-CHD counterparts (79% vs 68%; HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59-0.90; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Among adult CHD transplant recipients, single-ventricle physiology correlated with higher short-term mortality. However, 10-year conditional survival was similar for biventricular and most single-ventricle CHD patients, and notably better for biventricular CHD patients compared to non-CHD heart transplant recipients. These findings have significant implications towards patient selection and listing strategies, easing concerns related to heart transplantation in adults with CHD and destigmatizing most subtypes of single-ventricle CHD.

Off-label Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII for Cardiac Surgical Bleeding

Recombinant activated factor VII has been widely used in an off-label manner for cardiac surgical bleeding. Recent reports have administered recombinant activated factor VII earlier in the course of bleeding and at lower doses than initially reported. This review will discuss the history, mechanism, current recommendations for use, and recent data on the use of recombinant activated factor VII in cardiac surgical bleeding.

Efficacy, Safety, and Strategies for Recombinant-Activated Factor VII in Cardiac Surgical Bleeding: A Narrative Review

As perioperative bleeding continues to be a major source of morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery, the search continues for an ideal hemostatic agent for use in this patient population. Transfusion of blood products has been associated both with increased costs and risks, such as infection, prolonged mechanical ventilation, increased length of stay, and decreased survival. Recombinant-activated factor VII (rFVIIa) first was approved for the US market in 1999 and since that time has been used in a variety of clinical settings. This review summarizes the existing literature pertaining to perioperative rFVIIa, in addition to society recommendations and current guidelines regarding its use in cardiac surgery.

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and LVAD: What are the chances? A case report and literature review

Left-ventricular-assist-device (LVAD) implantation in patients with antiphospholipid-syndrome (APS) is considered a high-risk procedure and its indication still represents an open challenge. Herein, we report a 63-year-old man with APS and end-stage heart failure, for whom a HeartMate3-LVAD and a continuous rheologic profile monitoring with a multiparametric assessment resulted the optimal therapeutic strategy.

Use of Factor VIIa and Anti-inhibitor Coagulant Complex in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patients

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative bleeding is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiac patients who undergo cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Pediatric patients are especially at risk for adverse effects of surgery and CPB on the coagulation system. This can result in bleeding, transfusions, and poor outcomes. Excessive bleeding unresponsive to blood products can warrant the off-label use of recombinant activated clotting factor VIIa (rFVIIa) and/or anti-inhibitor coagulant complex (FEIBA). Several studies have shown the utility in these agents off-label in patients who have undergone cardiac bypass surgery with acute bleeding episodes that are refractory to blood products. However, data regarding use of these agents in pediatrics are sparse. The purpose of this study is to report the use of rFVIIa and FEIBA in pediatric cardiac surgery patients in our institution.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of pediatric cardiothoracic surgery patients who received rFVIIa or FEIBA at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta during the study period.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients received rFVIIa and 9 patients received FEIBA either intraoperatively or postoperatively for bleeding related to the cardiac procedure. Approximately 13% of rFVIIa patients and 55% of FEIBA patients required repeat doses. There were decreases for all blood products administered after rFVIIa and FEIBA were given. However, the doses used did not correlate with either positive or negative outcomes. Seventeen percent (n = 7) of rFVIIa patients experienced a thrombus and 22% (n = 2) of FEIBA patients experienced a thrombus.

CONCLUSIONS

Both rFVIIa and FEIBA reduced blood product usage in pediatric patients following cardiac procedures.

Short-term mechanical circulatory support devices as bridge to heart transplantation: A prospective single-center experience in Argentina

BACKGROUND

Patients with cardiogenic shock may require hemodynamic stabilization with short-term mechanical circulatory support devices (ST-MCS) such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and centrifugal pump (CP) as bridge to transplantion (BTT). This study aimed to describe ECMO and CP during BTT and after heart transplant.

METHODS

A cohort of patients on ECMO or CP as BTT between April 2006 and April 2018 in a single hospital.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven consecutive patients with ECMO (n = 14) or CP (n = 23) were included. Acute kidney injury was more prevalent during CP (28.6% vs 69.6%, P = .02). There were no differences in stroke, thrombosis, sepsis, or vasoplegia. Bleeding (0% vs 56.5%, P = .0003) and reoperation (0% vs 47.8%, P = .002) were more frequent in CP group as well as mortality (0 vs 7 [30.4%], P = .03). The remaining 30 patients (81.1%) underwent heart transplantation, without differences in primary graft dysfunction, vasoplegia, reoperation for bleeding, or hospital stay. Mortality was 23.3% at 30 days, similar in both groups, with no further deaths at median follow-up of 44.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cardiogenic shock, ST-MCS with ECMO or CP as BTT are a lifesaving approach allowing successful transplantation in the majority of cases, with good short- and long-term survival.

2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support

Long-term mechanical circulatory support (LT-MCS) is an important treatment modality for patients with severe heart failure. Different devices are available, and many-sometimes contradictory-observations regarding patient selection, surgical techniques, perioperative management and follow-up have been published. With the growing expertise in this field, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) recognized a need for a structured multidisciplinary consensus about the approach to patients with LT-MCS. However, the evidence published so far is insufficient to allow for generation of meaningful guidelines complying with EACTS requirements. Instead, the EACTS presents an expert opinion in the LT-MCS field. This expert opinion addresses patient evaluation and preoperative optimization as well as management of cardiac and non-cardiac comorbidities. Further, extensive operative implantation techniques are summarized and evaluated by leading experts, depending on both patient characteristics and device selection. The faculty recognized that postoperative management is multidisciplinary and includes aspects of intensive care unit stay, rehabilitation, ambulatory care, myocardial recovery and end-of-life care and mirrored this fact in this paper. Additionally, the opinions of experts on diagnosis and management of adverse events including bleeding, cerebrovascular accidents and device malfunction are presented. In this expert consensus, the evidence for the complete management from patient selection to end-of-life care is carefully reviewed with the aim of guiding clinicians in optimizing management of patients considered for or supported by an LT-MCS device.

Factor VIIa administration in orthotopic heart transplant recipients and its impact on thromboembolic events and post-transplant outcomes

Recombinant, activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is used during cardiac surgeries to mitigate refractory coagulopathic bleeding. The purpose of this study was to examine whether rFVIIa use in orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients was associated with a higher incidence of thromboembolic (TE) events compared to patients who did not. A single-center, retrospective, cohort study was performed on OHT recipients who received rFVIIa for refractory coagulopathic bleeding from January 2013 to December 2015. Patients were evaluated for up to 6 months after transplantation and assessed for TE events, rejection, readmissions, graft survival, and patient survival. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi square test while student's t or ANOVA testing was utilized for continuous variables. Of the 62 patients who met inclusion criteria, 27 patients received rFVIIa, and 35 patients were selected for the control group. The overall incidence of TE events was not significantly different between patients who received rFVIIa compared to patients in the control group (14.8% vs 11.4%) (p = 0.69). Within 14 days, 14.81% of rFVIIa patients suffered a TE event compared to 5.7% of the control group (p = 0.23). Rejection, readmissions, graft survival, and patient survival were not significantly different at any time points. Use of rFVIIa in heart transplantation showed no difference in the overall rate of TE events, however, there was a nonsignificant trend toward higher risk of early TE development in the rFVIIa group compared to the control group.

Acquired coagulopathy in patients with left ventricular assist devices

Chronic heart failure (HF) is a major emerging healthcare problem, associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have emerged as a successful treatment option for patients with end-stage HF. Despite its great benefit, the use of LVAD is associated with a high risk of complications. Bleeding, pump thrombosis and thromboembolic events are frequently observed complications, with bleeding complications occurring in over a third of the patients. Although the design of the third-generation LVAD has improved greatly, these hemostatic complications still occur. The introduction of an LVAD into the circulatory system results in an altered hematological balance as a consequence of blood-pump interactions, changes in hemodynamics, the rheology, and the concomitant need for anticoagulation while implanted with an LVAD. The majority, if not all, LVAD patients experience a form of platelet dysfunction and impaired von Willebrand factor activity, leading to acquired coagulopathy disorders. Different diagnostic tools and treatment strategies have been reported; however, they require validation in LVAD patients. The present review focuses on acquired coagulopathies, describing the incidence, impact and underlying mechanism of acquired coagulopathy disorders in patients supported by LVADs. In addition, we will discuss diagnostic and management strategies for these acquired coagulopathies.

Impact on postoperative bleeding and cost of recombinant activated factor VII in patients undergoing heart transplantation

Background:

Cardiac transplantation can be complicated by refractory hemorrhage particularly in cases where explantation of a ventricular assist device is necessary. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been used to treat refractory bleeding in cardiac surgery patients, but little information is available on its efficacy or cost in heart transplant patients.

Methods:

Patients who had orthotopic heart transplantation between January 2009 and December 2014 at a single center were reviewed. Postoperative bleeding and the total costs of hemostatic therapies were compared between patients who received rFVIIa and those who did not. Propensity scores were created and used to control for the likelihood of receiving rFVIIa in order to reduce bias in our risk estimates.

Results:

Seventy-six patients underwent heart transplantation during the study period. Twenty-one patients (27.6%) received rFVIIa for refractory intraoperative bleeding. There was no difference in postoperative red blood cell transfusion, chest tube output, or surgical re-exploration between patients who received rFVIIa and those who did not, even after adjusting with the propensity score (P = 0.94, P = 0.60, and P = 0.10, respectively). The total cost for hemostatic therapies was significantly higher in the rFVIIa group (median $10,819 vs. $1,985; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis of patients who underwent redo-sternotomy with left ventricular assist device explantation did not show any benefit for rFVIIa either.

Conclusions:

In this relatively small cohort, rFVIIa use was not associated with decreased postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing heart transplantation; however, it led to significantly higher cost.

Impact of an innovative blood factor stewardship program on drug expense and patient care

PURPOSE

An innovative pharmacist-led program to improve prescribing, dosing, and monitoring of clotting factor therapy within a large health system is described.

SUMMARY

In an initiative to optimize patient outcomes and control costs associated with the use of clotting factor concentrates, the pharmacy department at University of North Carolina Medical Center (UNCMC) led the development of a "factor stewardship program" in collaboration with UNCMC hematologists. Key steps in program development and implementation included (1) selection of one formulary product within each clotting factor class, (2) establishment of guidelines on blood factor prescribing, order review, compounding, and administration, and (3) initial and ongoing education of pharmacy, nursing, and medical staff. As part of the program, a designated pharmacist rounds with hematologists daily, recommending treatment plan modifications and dosage adjustments as appropriate. Now in its fifth year, the stewardship program has enabled consistent pharmacist oversight of all aspects of clotting factor use and enhanced transitions-of-care coordination. Through optimization of product selection, dosing regimens, and infusion frequencies, the number of blood factor doses in fiscal year 2013 was reduced by 45% from the prior year despite a 22% increase in the volume of treated patients; in patients with hemophilia A, re-admissions due to bleeding episodes have declined. During the four-year period ending in July 2014, estimated cost savings attributable to the stewardship program exceeded $4 million annually.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the UNCMC stewardship program has led to improved outcomes in patients receiving clotting factor concentrates, with significant institutional cost savings.

Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Benefits and Risks of Thromboprophylaxis After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Optimal thromboprophylaxis after cardiac surgery is uncertain. This systematic review aimed to define the incidence and risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), fatal and nonfatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and assess whether venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis was effective in reducing VTE without complications after cardiac surgery.

Methods and Results

Two reviewers independently searched and assessed the quality and outcomes of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on VTE after cardiac surgery in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane controlled trial register (1966 to December 2014). Sixty‐eight studies provided data on VTE outcomes or complications related to thromboprophylaxis after cardiac surgery. The majority of the studies were observational studies (n=49), 16 studies were RCTs, and 3 were meta‐analyses. VTE prophylaxis was associated with a reduced risk of PE (relative risk [RR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–0.72; P=0.0008) or symptomatic VTE (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28–0.71; P=0.0006) compared to the control without significant heterogeneity. Median incidence (interquartile range) of symptomatic DVT, PE, and fatal PE were 3.2% (0.6–8.1), 0.6% (0.3–2.9), and 0.3% (0.08–1.7), respectively. Previous history of VTE, obesity, left or right ventricular failure, and prolonged bed rest, mechanical ventilation, or use of a central venous catheter were common risk factors for VTE. Bleeding or cardiac tamponade requiring reoperation owing to pharmacological VTE prophylaxis alone, without systemic anticoagulation, was not observed.

Conclusions

Unless proven otherwise by adequately powered RCTs, initiating pharmacological VTE prophylaxis as soon as possible after cardiac surgery for patients who have no active bleeding is highly recommended.

Early postoperative management of heart transplant recipients with current ventricular assist device support in Japan: experience from a single center

PURPOSE

This study reviews our experience with the perioperative management of heart transplant (HT) recipients and explores how prior ventricular assist device (VAD) support affects the requirements for postoperative mechanical ventilation and circulatory support.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective database review was performed from 2007 to 2014. Early postoperative outcomes were compared between VAD and non-VAD groups. Forty-four patients were studied. The mean age was 38 ± 13 years, 30% were female, and 88% experienced non-ischemic heart failure. Forty patients (91%) required VAD support at the time of HT, with a mean duration of 864 ± 351 days. The median postoperative mechanical ventilation times in the VAD and non-VAD groups were 54 [95% confidence interval (CI) 42.9-297.3] and 15 (95% CI 4.8-30.0; p = 0.0199) hours, respectively. The VAD group experienced increased bleeding during the first 48 h after HT (6.7 ± 3.5 vs. 1.8 ± 0.75 l, p = 0.004). Mechanical circulatory support with intra-aortic balloon pumping or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was required in 30% of VAD group patients. Increased bleeding and primary graft failure were the main causes of prolonged mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

HT recipients with VAD support required longer mechanical ventilation periods and mechanical circulatory support in the postoperative period.

Usefulness of laboratory values in predicting effectiveness of recombinant factor VIIa in surgical patients with bleeding

PURPOSE

The results of a study to determine whether certain laboratory values can predict the effectiveness of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) therapy to control postoperative bleeding in surgical patients are presented.

METHODS

In a retrospective observational study at a large university hospital, the records of all adult patients on the cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) and general or trauma surgery (GTS) units who received rFVIIa for treatment-refractory nonsurgical bleeding episodes (an off-label use) during a 17-month period were reviewed. Collected data included blood product requirements before and after administration of rFVIIa, selected periadministration laboratory values (e.g., International Normalized Ratio, platelet count, arterial pH, fibrinogen concentration), 24-hour and 30-day mortality, and documented adverse thrombotic events.

RESULTS

Among the 18 GTS and 32 CTS patients who received rFVIIa during the study period, hemostasis (as defined according to 12- and 24-hour transfusion requirements) was achieved in 50% of patients in both groups. Two of the evaluated laboratory values were found to be predictive of reduced rFVIIa effectiveness. Hemostasis was not achieved in any patient with an arterial pH of ≤7.1 or a fibrinogen concentration of <100 mg/dL. The study results did not support the hypothesis that a platelet count of <50,000 cells/L is associated with reduced effectiveness of rFVIIa therapy for the studied indication. Adverse thrombotic events occurred in 14 patients (28%) after rFVIIa administration.

CONCLUSION

CTS and GTS patients with bleeding episodes and an arterial pH of ≤7.1 or a fibrinogen concentration of <100 mg/dL were not likely to achieve hemostasis after rFVIIa therapy.

Coagulation management in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support

The incidence of bleeding and thrombo-embolic complications in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support therapy remains high and is associated with bad outcomes and increased costs. The need for anticoagulation and anti-platelet therapy varies widely between different pulsatile and non-pulsatile ventricular-assist devices (VADs) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) systems. Therefore, a unique anticoagulation protocol cannot be recommended. Notably, most thrombo-embolic complications occur despite values of conventional coagulation tests being within the targeted range. This is due to the fact that conventional coagulation tests such as international normalised ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and platelet count cannot detect hyper- or hypofibrinolysis, hypercoagulability due to tissue factor expression on circulating cells or increased clot firmness, and platelet aggregation as well as response to anti-platelet drugs. By contrast, point-of-care (POC) whole blood viscoelastic tests (thromboelastometry/-graphy) and platelet function tests (impedance or turbidimetric aggregometry) reflect in detail the haemostatic status of patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support therapy and the efficacy of their anticoagulation and antiaggregation therapy. Therefore, monitoring of haemostasis using POC thromboelastometry/-graphy and platelet function analysis is recommended during mechanical circulatory support therapy to reduce the risk of bleeding and thrombo-embolic complications. Notably, these haemostatic tests should be performed repeatedly during mechanical circulatory support therapy since thrombin generation, clot firmness and platelet response may change significantly over time with a high inter- and intra-individual variability. Furthermore, coagulation management can be hampered in non-pulsatile VADs by acquired von Willebrand syndrome, and in general by acquired factor XIII deficiency as well as by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. In addition, POC testing can be used in bleeding patients to guide calculated goal-directed therapy with allogeneic blood products, haemostatic drugs and coagulation factor concentrates to optimise the haemostasis and to minimise transfusion requirements, transfusion-associated adverse events and to avoid thrombo-embolic complications, as well. However, coagulation management in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support therapy is somehow like navigating between Scylla and Charybdis, and development of protocols based on POC testing seems to be beneficial.

Ventricular assist devices: pharmacological aspects of a mechanical therapy

Heart failure (HF) is a global epidemic that continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality despite advances in medical therapy. Ventricular assist device technology has emerged as a therapeutic option to bridge patients with end-stage HF to heart transplantation or as an alternative to transplantation in selected patients. In some patients, mechanical unloading induced by ventricular assist devices leads to improvement of myocardial function and a possibility of device removal. The implementation of this advanced technology requires multiple pharmacological interventions, both in the perioperative and long-term periods, in order to minimize potential complications and improve patient outcomes. We herein review the latest available evidence supporting the use of specific pharmacological interventions and current practices in the care of these patients: anticoagulation, bleeding management, pump thrombosis, infections, arrhythmias, right ventricular failure, hypertension, desensitization protocols, among others. Areas of uncertainty and ground for future research are also highlighted.

Systematic review: benefits and harms of in-hospital use of recombinant factor VIIa for off-label indications

BACKGROUND

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), a hemostatic agent approved for hemophilia, is increasingly used for off-label indications.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the benefits and harms of rFVIIa use for 5 off-label, in-hospital indications: intracranial hemorrhage, cardiac surgery, trauma, liver transplantation, and prostatectomy.

DATA SOURCES

Ten databases (including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) queried from inception through December 2010. Articles published in English were analyzed.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts to identify clinical use of rFVIIa for the selected indications and identified all randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies for full-text review.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed study characteristics and rated study quality and indication-wide strength of evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

16 RCTs, 26 comparative observational studies, and 22 noncomparative observational studies met inclusion criteria. Identified comparators were limited to placebo (RCTs) or usual care (observational studies). For intracranial hemorrhage, mortality was not improved with rFVIIa use across a range of doses. Arterial thromboembolism was increased with medium-dose rFVIIa use (risk difference [RD], 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.06]) and high-dose rFVIIa use (RD, 0.06 [CI, 0.01 to 0.11]). For adult cardiac surgery, there was no mortality difference, but there was an increased risk for thromboembolism (RD, 0.05 [CI, 0.01 to 0.10]) with rFVIIa. For body trauma, there were no differences in mortality or thromboembolism, but there was a reduced risk for the acute respiratory distress syndrome (RD, -0.05 [CI, -0.02 to -0.08]). Mortality was higher in observational studies than in RCTs.

LIMITATIONS

The amount and strength of evidence were low for most outcomes and indications. Publication bias could not be excluded.

CONCLUSION

Limited available evidence for 5 off-label indications suggests no mortality reduction with rFVIIa use. For some indications, it increases thromboembolism.

Off-label use of recombinant activated factor VII in intractable haemorrhage after cardiovascular surgery: an observational study of practices in 23 French cardiac centres (2005-7)

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to describe French off-label use of rFVIIa for intractable bleeding in major cardiovascular surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective observational analysis of data from 2005 to October 2007 (no formal guidelines were available) was employed. The collect request form was elaborated by a multidisciplinary committee.

RESULTS

Data on 109 patients--37 mechanical cardiac assist devices--were collected, with repeated injection for 24%. Bleeding stopped, decreased or continued in 43%, 37% and 20% of the cases, respectively. For patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU), hourly bleeding decreased from 365 ± 212 to 115 ± 106 ml h(-1) (p<0.001). The median number of transfused products was 25 (2-90) before and 6 (0-48) after rFVIIa (p<0.001). Most patients had been well compensated with fibrinogen (>1g.l(-1)) and platelets (>50 G.l(-1)) before rFVIIa. The bleeding outcome (cessation, decrease or no change) was associated with the infused dose (81 ± 31, 71 ± 24, 64 ± 23 μg.kg(-1); p = 0.044) and did not differ whether rFVIIa was administered in the operating room (49%) or ICU (51%). Thrombotic events occurred in 13% of patients without assist devices and in 27% of those with them (but without obvious intra-device clotting). The overall 28-day survival rate was 60% and associated with bleeding outcome (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

rFVIIa rescue therapy was followed by control of bleeding in a substantial number of the patients with seemingly acceptable safety; however, thrombotic risk remains a matter of concern. Our observational study suggests that the dose to be tested prospectively is at least 80 μg.kg(-1).

Systematic review: benefits and harms of in-hospital use of recombinant factor VIIa for off-label indications

BACKGROUND

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), a hemostatic agent approved for hemophilia, is increasingly used for off-label indications.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the benefits and harms of rFVIIa use for 5 off-label, in-hospital indications: intracranial hemorrhage, cardiac surgery, trauma, liver transplantation, and prostatectomy.

DATA SOURCES

Ten databases (including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) queried from inception through December 2010. Articles published in English were analyzed.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts to identify clinical use of rFVIIa for the selected indications and identified all randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies for full-text review.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed study characteristics and rated study quality and indication-wide strength of evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

16 RCTs, 26 comparative observational studies, and 22 noncomparative observational studies met inclusion criteria. Identified comparators were limited to placebo (RCTs) or usual care (observational studies). For intracranial hemorrhage, mortality was not improved with rFVIIa use across a range of doses. Arterial thromboembolism was increased with medium-dose rFVIIa use (risk difference [RD], 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.06]) and high-dose rFVIIa use (RD, 0.06 [CI, 0.01 to 0.11]). For adult cardiac surgery, there was no mortality difference, but there was an increased risk for thromboembolism (RD, 0.05 [CI, 0.01 to 0.10]) with rFVIIa. For body trauma, there were no differences in mortality or thromboembolism, but there was a reduced risk for the acute respiratory distress syndrome (RD, -0.05 [CI, -0.02 to -0.08]). Mortality was higher in observational studies than in RCTs.

LIMITATIONS

The amount and strength of evidence were low for most outcomes and indications. Publication bias could not be excluded.

CONCLUSION

Limited available evidence for 5 off-label indications suggests no mortality reduction with rFVIIa use. For some indications, it increases thromboembolism.

Pharmacotherapy for Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Comprehensive Review

Objective

To provide a comprehensive review of the pharmacotherapy associated with the provision of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to patients with end-stage heart failure and guidance regarding the selection, assessment, and optimization of drug therapy for this population.

Data Sources:

The MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1960 to July 2010 for articles published in English using the search terms mechanical circulatory support, ventricular assist system, ventricular assist device, left ventricular assist device, right ventricular assist device, biventricular assist device, total artificial heart, pulsatile, positive displacement, axial, centrifugal, hemostasis, bleeding, hemodynamic, blood pressure, thrombosis, antithrombotic therapy, anticoagulant, antiplatelet, right ventricular failure, ventricular arrhythmia, anemia, arteriovenous malformation, stroke, infection, and clinical pharmacist.

Study Selection And Data Extraction:

All relevant original studies, metaanalyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, and reviews were assessed for inclusion. References from pertinent articles were examined for content not found during the initial search.

Data Synthesis:

MCS has advanced significantly since the first left ventricular assist device was implanted in 1966. Further advancements in MCS technology that occurred in the tatter decade are changing the overall management of end-stage heart failure care and cardiac transplantation. These pumps allow for improved bridge-to-transplant rates, enhanced survival, and quality of life. Pharmacotherapy associated with MCS devices may optimize the performance of the pumps and improve patient outcomes, as well as minimize morbidity related to their adverse effects. This review highlights the knowledge needed to provide appropriate clinical pharmacy services for patients supported by MCS devices.

Conclusions:

The HeartMate II clinical investigators called for the involvement of pharmacists in MCS patient assessment and optimization. Pharmacotherapeutic management of patients supported with MCS devices requires individualized care, with pharmacists as part of the team, based on the characteristics of each pump and recipient.

High incidence of thromboembolic events in left ventricular assist device patients treated with recombinant activated factor VII

BACKGROUND

Dosing of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is controversial and unstandardized, and there is growing concern about thromboembolic complications, especially in left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-supported patients. We reviewed our experience with rFVIIa administration in patients with LVADs and examined its effectiveness and adverse effects, including the incidence of thromboembolic events and its correlation with increasing doses.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 62 patients who received an LVAD and rFVIIa at our center between January 2004 and November 2006. Patients who received a single dose of 10 to 20 microg/kg (n = 32; 52%) constituted the "low-dose" cohort, and patients who received 30 to 70 microg/kg (n = 30; 48%) constituted the "high-dose" cohort. Laboratory values obtained before and after rFVIIa administration, as well as patients' transfusion requirements, were compared to determine the effectiveness of rFVIIa in reversing coagulopathy and reducing blood loss. We also compared the incidence of thromboembolic events in the low- and high-dose groups.

RESULTS

Administration of rFVIIa was associated with significant decreases in prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and transfusion requirements. This association was seen in both the low- and high-dose groups. In addition, the incidence of thromboembolic events was significantly higher in the high-dose group (36.7%) than in the low-dose group (9.4%) (p < or = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although rFVIIa administration seemed helpful in controlling life-threatening hemorrhage, patients requiring higher doses (30 to 70 microg/kg) had a dramatically higher incidence of serious thromboembolic events.

Assisting the failing heart

Anesthesiologists increasingly encounter patients who have a spectrum of heart failure ranging from stable chronic heart failure to acute heart failure to cardiogenic shock. Improved medical therapy has increased the survival of patients who have chronic heart failure but not of patients who have acute heart failure. New surgical techniques and mechanical devices may offer alternatives to certain patients who have refractory heart failure This article provides an overview of established and newer pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies and surgical interventions to manage patients who have heart failure, including the perioperative management of heart transplantation and ventricular assist devices.