Anaesthetic management of cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy perfusion

The Role of Hyperthermic Intrathoracic Chemotherapy (HITHOC) in Thoracic Tumors

Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a rare but aggressive thoracic tumor with a poor prognosis. Multimodal treatment-including induction chemotherapy, aggressive surgical resection, radiotherapy and immunotherapy in selected cases-currently represents the best therapeutic option. Single-center studies advocate hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) during surgical resection as an additional therapeutic option, although its impact on post-operative morbidity and survival has not yet been evaluated on a larger scale. HITHOC can be applied not only in the case of mesothelioma, but also in the case of thymoma with pleural involvement or-in very selected cases-in patients with secondary pleural metastases. Despite favorable outcomes and reduced clinical risks, there is no uniform approach to HITHOC, and a wide variety of indications and technical applications are still reported. Based on available data, HITHOC seems to offer a clear benefit in regard to overall survival of all mesothelioma patients; however, multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to validate and standardize this approach. The aim of this review is to focus on the present role of HITHOC in thoracic tumors with pleural involvement as well as on future challenges, particularly in the light of possible combined therapy of thoracic tumors still presenting poor prognoses.

Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy for the treatment of thymic epithelial malignancies with pleural spread or recurrence (CHOICE): a study protocol for a prospective, open, single-arm study

Background

Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (S-HITHOC) may be effective in treating thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) with pleural spread or recurrence. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of S-HITHOC in the treatment of TETs with pleural spread or recurrence.

Methods

This study is an open, single-arm, prospective trial. Approximately 37 patients diagnosed with TETs with pleural spread or recurrence at the Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University will be recruited and treated with S-HITHOC. The co-primary outcomes of the study are the length of postoperative hospital stay, complications, and overall quality of life (QoL). The secondary outcomes include drainage duration, volume, and cumulative pain scores.

Discussion

This trial was approved by the Zhongshan Hospital Research Ethics Committee. The study findings will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations. Information sheets will be provided to each participant, and informed written consent will be obtained for each evaluation. This prospective study will evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical resection combined with the HITHOC procedure in treating TETs with pleural spread or recurrence in China and will support the standardization of the procedure.

Registration

This trial was registered on Clinialtrial.gov (No. NCT05446935).

Hyperthermic intrapleural chemotherapy: an update

The safety and efficacy of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) as an adjunct to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in pleural malignancies has been well demonstrated. This is most often described in cases of mesothelioma, thymoma, or other secondary pleural metastases. The utilization of a direct cytotoxic agent with increased penetration secondary to a hyperthermic environment is especially beneficial in pleural malignancy as a microscopic resection remains immensely challenging. Despite favorable outcomes with a limited associated risk profile, there persists a variety in utilization and technique of HITHOC described in current literature. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines state that though intraoperative adjuvant therapies such as HITHOC have been studied, they remain of unclear benefit and definitive recommendations do not currently exist. This ambiguity limits the standardization of HITHOC, thus hindering its further application in a patient population with exceedingly poor outcomes within current guideline-based therapy. As the prevalence of pleural malignancies necessitating CRS with adjuvant HITHOC remains quite low, we believe a task force initiative to further investigate the role of HITHOC in surgical management of pleural malignancies would enable wider utility of this promising technique. Additionally, we propose that the creation of a pleural cancer index could aid in standardization of HITHOC in those with pleural malignancy.

The impact on postoperative outcomes of intraoperative fluid management strategies during cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The impact of intraoperative fluid management during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on postoperative outcomes has been poorly investigated. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of intraoperative fluid management strategy on postoperative outcomes and survival.

METHODS

509 patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC at Uppsala University Hospital/Sweden 2004-2017 were categorized into two groups according to the intraoperative fluid management strategy: pre-goal directed therapy (pre-GDT) and goal directed therapy (GDT), where a hemodynamic monitor (CardioQ or FloTrac/Vigileo) was used to optimize fluid management. Impact on morbidity, postoperative hemorrhage, length-of-stay and survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

The pre-GDT group received higher fluid volume compared to the GDT group (mean 19.9 vs. 16.2 ml/kg/h, p < 0.001). Overall postoperative morbidity Grade III-V was higher in the GDT group (30% vs. 22%, p = 0.03). Multivariable adjusted odds ratio (OR) for Grade III-V morbidity was 1.80 (95%CI 1.10-3.10, p = 0.02) in the GDT group. Numerically, more cases of postoperative hemorrhage were found in the GDT group (9% vs. 5%, p = 0.09), but no correlation was observed in the multivariable analysis 1.37 (95%CI 0.64-2.95, p = 0.40). An oxaliplatin regimen was a significant risk factor for postoperative hemorrhage (p = 0.03). Mean length of stay was shorter in the GDT group (17 vs. 26 days, p < 0.0001). Survival did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

While GDT increased the risk for postoperative morbidity, it was associated with shortened hospital stay. Intraoperative fluid management during CRS and HIPEC did not affect the postoperative risk for hemorrhage, while the use of an oxaliplatin regimen did.

Narrative review of theoretical considerations regarding HITHOC between past and future

Hyppocrates constructed the medicines-surgery-energy triangle which includes all therapeutical modalities. Hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy (HITHOC) is a synergy-based single stage multimodality treatment encompassing the locoregional manifestation of the systemic malignant process. Pleural space, thermal effect, lavage/irrigation and chemotherapy represent the basic science ports of the network hub: HITHOC. The malignant transformation and process of the pleural surface (and underlying lung) challenges space management and tissue control. Thermotherapy without local chemotherapy is insufficient, similar to the normothermic local irrigation aligned with anticancer agents. The local administration of combined heat-transfer fluid and chemotherapy with or without subsequent surgical removal offers reasonable outcome in extensive primary pleural neoplasms (malignant mesothelioma), advanced (> Stage IIIA) NSCLC, functionally inoperable lung cancer and pleural carcinosis from extrathoracic malignancies. Measured by symptom-free survival and the quality of life, HITHOC in its present form, offers a modest yet fully substantiated solution. HITHOC in combination with the local application of targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy administered in the pleural space are currently under investigation. Additional development including new acting substances, their solvents and the means regarding surgical delivery and anesthesiology techniques are sign posts up ahead. Level 2 evidence are required in order to stepping up the recommendation levels, rewriting protocols and guidelines, in which HITHOC earns its revered position in the decision making process it deserves.

A narrative review of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer

The traditional treatment of stage IV lung cancer is predominantly supportive or palliative. No current standardized guidelines promote the use of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) in the treatment of advanced lung cancer with pleural involvement. Several small studies have examined the safety and utilization of HITHOC for this population, though the data is extremely limited. A review of the literature is presented in accordance with the Narrative Review checklist. The MEDLINE electronic database was searched for articles published in English from January 1999 - August 2020 using relevant keywords such as "hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy", "hyperthermic intrapleural chemotherapy" and "HITHOC". This was supplemented by review and hand search of the reference lists. While data suggest a potential though controversial role for HITHOC for certain intrathoracic tumors such as malignant pleural mesothelioma and thymoma, there is insufficient evidence to confidently promote a role for hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced lung cancers. Existing studies are small, nonrandomized, and prone to bias. Hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy is not a standardized treatment for advanced lung cancer, and is characterized by potentially serious side effects with little clinical benefit. Recent developments in targeted therapy and immunotherapy are unlikely to leave room for the development of large randomized controlled trials.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations - Part I: Preoperative and intraoperative management

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to considerably reduce complications, length of stay and costs after most of surgical procedures by standardised application of best evidence-based perioperative care. The aim was to elaborate dedicated recommendations for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a two-part series of guidelines based on expert consensus. The present part I of the guidelines highlights preoperative and intraoperative management.

METHODS

The core group assembled a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts involved in peritoneal surface malignancy surgery representing the fields of general surgery (n = 12), gynaecological surgery (n = 6), and anaesthesia (n = 6). Experts systematically reviewed and summarized the available evidence on 72 identified perioperative care items, following the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, evaluation) system. Final consensus (defined as ≥50%, or ≥70% of weak/strong recommendations combined) was reached by a standardised 2-round Delphi process, regarding the strength of recommendations.

RESULTS

Response rates were 100% for both Delphi rounds. Quality of evidence was evaluated high, moderate low and very low, for 15 (21%), 26 (36%), 29 (40%) and 2 items, respectively. Consensus was reached for 71/72(98.6%) items. Strong recommendations were defined for 37 items, No consensus could be reached regarding the preemptive use of fresh frozen plasma.

CONCLUSION

The present ERAS recommendations for CRS±HIPEC are based on a standardised expert consensus process providing clinicians with valuable guidance. There is an urgent need to produce high quality studies for CRS±HIPEC and to prospectively evaluate recommendations in clinical practice.

Protocol of a retrospective, multicentre observational study on hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy in Germany

INTRODUCTION

Objective of the 'German hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITOC) study' is to evaluate the HITOC as additional treatment after surgical cytoreduction for malignant pleural tumours. Even though HITOC is applied with increasing frequency, there is no standardised therapy protocol concerning the technique of HITOC, the selection as well as dosage of chemotherapeutic agents and perioperative management in order to provide a safe and comparable, standardised treatment regime.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This trial is a retrospective, multicentre observational study, which is funded by the German Research Foundation. Approximately 300 patients will be included. Four departments of thoracic surgery, which are performing the most HITOC procedures in Germany, are contributing to this study: Center for Thoracic Surgery at the University Hospital Regensburg, Thoracic Clinic Heidelberg of the University of Heidelberg, Center for Thoracic Surgery of the Hospital University of Munich and the Department of Thoracic Surgery at the University Hospital Freiburg. All patients who underwent surgical cytoreduction and subsequent HITOC at one of the four centres between starting the HITOC programme in 2008 and December 2019 will be included. Information on the performed HITOC will be obtained, focusing on the technique as well as the applied perfusion solution including the chemotherapeutic agent. Furthermore, parameters of the patient's postoperative recovery will be analysed to determine 30-day morbidity and mortality.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The approvals by the local ethics committee of the respective clinic and the three participating clinics have been obtained. The results will be presented in conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00015012; Pre-results).

Postoperative pain pathophysiology and treatment strategies after CRS + HIPEC for peritoneal cancer

Background

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a treatment choice for peritoneal cancer. However, patients commonly suffer from severe postoperative pain. The pathophysiology of postoperative pain is considered to be from both nociceptive and neuropathic origins.

Main body

The recent advances on the etiology of postoperative pain after CRS + HIPEC treatment were described, and the treatment strategy and outcomes were summarized.

Conclusion

Conventional analgesics could provide short-term symptomatic relief. Thoracic epidural analgesia combined with opioids administration could be an effective treatment choice. In addition, a transversus abdominis plane block could also be an alternative option, although further studies should be performed.

[Perioperative management for CRS and HIPEC : Anesthesiological aspects]

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are therapeutic options for the treatment of intra-abdominal neoplasms. Following the resection of all visible tumor areas by CRS, microscopic tumor areas are treated with HIPEC. This procedure increases the quality of life and survival. The CRS with HIPEC is a complex surgical procedure in which the mainly younger and often otherwise healthy patients undergo several pathophysiological changes during the operation. The main concern of the anesthesiologist is the massive volume loss, volume shift and metabolic alterations. Patients with a high comorbidity should undergo preoperative optimization to reduce the perioperative morbidity and mortality especially by protracted interventions.

Adequate nephroprotection reduces renal complications after hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITOC) is used for the treatment of malignant pleural tumors. Although HITOC proved to be safe, postoperative renal failure due to nephrotoxicity of intrapleural cisplatin remains a concern.

METHODS

This single-center study was performed retrospectively in patients who underwent pleural tumor resection and HITOC between September 2008 and December 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients (female n = 33; 39.3%) with malignant pleural tumors underwent surgical cytoreduction with subsequent HITOC (60 minutes; 42°C). During the study period, we gradually increased the dosage of cisplatin (100-150 mg/m² BSA n = 36; 175 mg/m² BSA n = 2) and finally added doxorubicin (cisplatin 175 mg/m² BSA/doxorubicin 65 mg; n = 46). All patients had perioperative fluid balancing. The last 54 (64.3%) patients also received perioperative cytoprotection. Overall 29 patients (34.5%) experienced renal insufficiency. Despite higher cisplatin concentrations, patients with cytoprotection showed significantly lower postoperative serum creatinine levels after 1 week (P = .006) and at discharge (P = .020). Also, they showed less intermediate and severe renal insufficiencies (5.6% vs 13.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate perioperative fluid management and cytoprotection seem to be effective in protecting renal function. This allows the administration of higher intracavitary cisplatin doses without raising the rate of renal insufficiencies.

Prophylactic HIPEC with radical D2 gastrectomy improves survival and peritoneal recurrence rates for locally advanced gastric cancer: personal experience from a randomized case control study

Background

To investigate the implications of prophylactic intraoperative Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with D2 radical gastrectomy for locally advanced Gastric Cancer (AGC) in a randomized case control study.

Method

Eighty consecutive patients with locally AGC were randomly separated into 2 groups: HIPEC group (Curative Resection + intraoperative HIPEC with cisplatin 50 mg/m² at 42.0 ± 1.0 °C for 60 min) and Control group (Curative Resection only). Intraoperative and post-operative events, clinical recovery, morbidity and the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were closely monitored.

Results

Faster recovery of bowel function (43 ± 5 h vs 68 ± 7, P < 0.05) and shorter postoperative stay (8d vs 14d, P < 0.05) were noted in the HIPEC group. Among the 40 HIPEC group patients, the highest intracranial temperature recorded during the procedure was 38.2 °C but the patient made an eventless recovery. Mild renal dysfunction, hyperbilirubinemia and mild liver dysfunction were recorded in the HIPEC group but their incidences were found to be statistically insignificant when compared with the control group (P > 0.05). The 3 year DFS rate analysis showed that the prophylactic HIPEC group had a higher DFS rate (93% vs 65%, P = 0.0054). The peritoneal recurrence rate was lower in the HIPEC group (3% vs 23%, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Prophylactic HIPEC with radical D2 Gastrectomy improves survival and peritoneal recurrence rates for AGC with favorable post-operative recovery at low and acceptable morbidity.

Perioperative anesthetic management of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma undergoing cytoreductive surgery and intraoperative chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy (HITHOC) is a therapeutic option for treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Anesthetic management might be challenging.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A descriptive analysis of a case series is presented. Seven patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnostic undergoing HITHOC surgery were studied. Combined general and epidural anesthesia were administered. An intensive hemodynamic monitorization was implemented. Data regarding perioperative course was analyzed.

RESULTS

Between May 2015 and October 2018 7patients underwent HITHOC procedure. Blood transfusions were administered in all patients, and 5of the 7patients required vasoactive drug administration. Extubation at the end of the procedure was able in 6of the 7patients. The median length of stay in ICU was 4 days, and 29 days for the whole hospitalary stay. No significant postoperative pain was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

HITHOC surgery is a complex procedure in which several hemodynamic changes occur. An intensive intraoperative monitorization was useful for controlling complications.

[Perioperative management for CRS and HIPEC : Anesthesiological aspects]

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are therapeutic options for the treatment of intra-abdominal neoplasms. Following the resection of all visible tumor areas by CRS, microscopic tumor areas are treated with HIPEC. This procedure increases the quality of life and survival. The CRS with HIPEC is a complex surgical procedure in which the mainly younger and often otherwise healthy patients undergo several pathophysiological changes during the operation. The main concern of the anesthesiologist is the massive volume loss, volume shift and metabolic alterations. Patients with a high comorbidity should undergo preoperative optimization to reduce the perioperative morbidity and mortality especially by protracted interventions.

Abrupt hemodynamic changes accompanying intrapleural hyperthermic chemotherapy: Case series

RATIONALE

Intrapleural hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC) is the preferred method to locally treat lung cancer with pleural seeding. Anesthetic management during IPHC is a very challenging task for the anesthesiologist because of the hemodynamic instability associated with the procedure; however, there is no report on anesthetic considerations during the IPHC procedure.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Three patients who diagnosed lung cancer with pleural invasion scheduled for IPHC were reported in this case series.

DIAGNOSIS

Case 1, a 48-year-old woman, suffered from lung cancer (adenocarcinoma, T2NxM1a) with diffuse pleural seeding. Case 2, a 58-year-old female, diagnosed with lung cancer (adenocarcinoma, T3N0M1a) with pleural dissemination. Case 3, a 47-year-old male, diagnosed as sarcoma on the left lung with right pericardial invasion and right hemidiaphragm invasion (stage, T3N0M1a).

INTERVENTION

All three patients underwent IPHC with cisplatin diluted in normal saline (2000 ml) at a rate of 600 ml/min. Inflow temperature of 42°C was using a heart-lung machine over 90 minutes. Hemodynamic changes were monitored through the procedure.

OUTCOMES

The patient did not require supplemental oxygenation anymore after he recovered from lung transplantation.

LESSONS

There was sudden drop in the cardiac output and an increase in the pulmonary vascular resistance, which were caused by the volume and temperature of the hyperthermic chemotherapeutic drugs in the pleura during the early stage of IPHC; these changes can be a major problem during the procedure, and supportive hemodynamic management may be needed.

Hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy after extended pleurectomy and decortication for malignant pleura mesothelioma: an observational study on outcome and microcirculatory changes

Background

In the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma the Hyperthermic Intra THOracic Chemotherapy (HITHOC) can improve the efficacy of pleurectomy and decortication with a local cytotoxic effect. However its biological impact in patient's hemodynamic and microcirculatory changes were rarely investigated. Aim of this study is to describe our experience with HITHOC after pleurectomy and decortication evaluating the role of sublingual video-microscopy in assessing the microcirculatory changes in the perioperative period.

Methods

This is a prospective and observational study concerning 10 consecutive patients undergoing extended P/D followed by HITHOC. These patients underwent sublingual microcirculatory monitoring, which was adopted as a routine procedure since 2012. Haemodynamic parameters were collected at eight consecutive times: the day before surgery (T1), induction of anaesthesia (T2), surgical phase before HITHOC beginning (T3), 5 and 30 minutes after HITHOC start (T4 and T5, respectively), 5 minutes from HITHOC end (T6), after the admission in ICU (T7), at discharge from the ICU (T8). Cardiac output (CO) was calculated with MostCare. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR), oxygen delivery (DO₂), and oxygen extraction rate (O₂ER) were calculated using standard formulas. Arterial blood pressure and central venous pressure (CVP) were obtained with standard arterial and venous catheters. At the same times we assessed the sublingual microcirculation with Sidestream Dark Field technique.

Results

Hemodynamic and microcirculatory data were collected in 10 patients, 8 male and 2 females (mean age 68.6±9.0, and body surface area of 1.9±0.1 m²). All patients had arterial hypertension, and one patient had diabetes. The mean arterial pressure significantly decreased at T2, with respect to T1 (P=0.05). CO, CVP, DO₂, O₂ER, and ScvO₂, did not change significantly over the time. All patients needed infusion of noradrenalin from T4 to T6. TVD significantly decreased from T1 to T3, T5, and T8. Similarly, PVD significantly decreased from T1 to T3 and T8, and MFI from T1 to T6 and T8. PPV and HI did not change over the study period. No correlation was found between hemodynamic parameters (MAP, CO, CVP, DO₂, O₂ER, ScvO₂) and microcirculatory data (TVD, PVD, PPV, MFI, HI), at any time of the study.

Conclusions

In patients who receive HITHOC the fluid load can reduce the microvascular impairment restoring the normal tissue perfusion. This process takes days but is most evident in the first 72 h. The use of colloid and blood transfusion is much more effective in restoring microcirculation and reducing tissue damaging.

Effect of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy on the malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgery-based multimodality therapies have been used to control the malignant effusion and its recurrence in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) has been used in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma, but the results were controversial. The aim of the current study was, therefore, to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of HITHOC on MPM therapy. After thorough searching of online databases, total 21 articles were included into qualitative systematic review and 5 of them were used to conduct qualitative meta-analysis. It was found that most of HITHOC was used in combination of surgical resection including extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication. Patients who received HITHOC had significantly longer median survival length compared to the patients without HITHOC (Hedges's g = 0.384 ± 0.105, 95% CI: 0.178∼0.591, P < 0.001). In addition, HITHOC as palliative therapy was favored (Hedges's g = 0.591 ± 0.201, 95% CI: 0.196∼0.967, P < 0.001) in terms of recurrence free interval. The findings of the current study suggested that HITHOC is one of the safe and effective therapies in prolonging patients' median survival time and extending recurrence free interval.

Effect of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) on the malignant pleural effusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been widely used to treat malignant ascites or as a preventive strategy for microscopic carcinomatosis following surgical resection of abdominal tumors, application of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion is limited. The objective of the current study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the application of HITHOC in the palliative treatment of malignant pleural effusion.

METHODS

After thorough searching of online databases, total 27 articles were included into qualitative systematic review and 5 of them were used to conduct qualitative meta-analysis.

RESULTS

It was found that most of HITHOC was used in combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) including pleurectomy/decortication or after surgical resection of primary tumors, which mainly were lung cancer, thymoma or thymic carcinoma, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer. Patients who received HITHOC had significantly longer median survival length compared to the patients without HITHOC (Hedges g = 0.763, P < 0.001). In addition, HITHOC therapy was favored (Hedges g = 0.848, P < 0.001) in terms of median survival length, tumor-free survival rate, with tumor survival rate or Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scale.

CONCLUSION

HITHOC is a safe and effective therapy in controlling pleural effusion and increasing patient's survival rate.

Best practice for perioperative management of patients with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC

Due to the significantly improved outcome and quality of life of patients with different tumor entities after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC, there is an increasing number of centers performing CRS and HIPEC procedures. As this procedure is technically challenging with potential high morbidity and mortality, respectively, institutional experience also in the anesthetic and intensive care departments is essential for optimal treatment and prevention of adverse events. Clinical pathways have to be developed to achieve also good results in more comorbid patients with border line indications and extensive surgical procedures. The anesthesiologist has deal with relevant fluid, blood and protein losses, increased intraabdominal pressure, systemic hypo-/hyperthermia, and increased metabolic rate in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. It is of utmost importance to maintain or restore an adequate volume by aggressive substitution of intravenous fluids, which counteracts the increased fluid loss and venous capacitance during this procedure. Supplementary thoracic epidural analgesia, non-invasive ventilation, and physiotherapy are recommended to guarantee adequate pain therapy and postoperative extubation as well as fast-track concepts. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring is essential to help the anesthesiologist picking up information about the real-time fluid status of the patient. Preoperative preconditioning is mandatory in patients scheduled for HIPEC surgery and will result in improved outcome. Postoperatively, volume status optimization, early nutritional support, sufficient anticoagulation, and point of care coagulation management are essential. This is an extensive update on all relevant topics for anesthetists and intensivists dealing with CRS and HIPEC.

Anaesthetic management of extra-pleural pneumonectomy and hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy procedure

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare tumour with survival of 9-17 months after diagnosis. Radical surgical resection by extra-pleural pneumonectomy combined with hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy has shown to improve patient survival and better microscopic tumour control. Anaesthetic management of this procedure is challenging due to the complex pathophysiological changes associated with prolonged duration of surgery, one- lung ventilation, haemodynamic instability due to major blood loss, temperature variations including heat loss during pneumonectomy and rapid rise in temperature during hyperthermic chemotherapy, cardiac arrhythmias due to exposure to heated chemotherapeutics, cisplatin toxicity and acid-base changes. Intra-operative management involves protective ventilation, regulation of temperature and haemodynamics along with prevention of complications associated with 'heated chemotherapeutics'. Thorough pre-operative assessment and preparation, advanced intra-operative monitoring with prompt corrective interventions, will help in improved patient outcome in the immediate post-operative period. We present one such case done for the 1(st) time in India.