1
|
Stanborough T, Given FM, Koch B, Sheen CR, Stowers-Hull AB, Waterland MR, Crittenden DL. Optical Detection of CoV-SARS-2 Viral Proteins to Sub-Picomolar Concentrations. ACS OMEGA 2021; 6:6404-6413. [PMID: 33718731 PMCID: PMC7927290 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c00008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
The emergence of a new strain of coronavirus in late 2019, SARS-CoV-2, led to a global pandemic in 2020. This may have been preventable if large scale, rapid diagnosis of active cases had been possible, and this has highlighted the need for more effective and efficient ways of detecting and managing viral infections. In this work, we investigate three different optical techniques for quantifying the binding of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to surface-immobilized oligonucleotide aptamers. Biolayer interferometry is a relatively cheap, robust, and rapid method that only requires very small sample volumes. However, its detection limit of 250 nM means that it is not sensitive enough to detect antigen proteins at physiologically relevant levels (sub-pM). Surface plasmon resonance is a more sensitive technique but requires larger sample volumes, takes longer, requires more expensive instrumentation, and only reduces the detection limit to 5 nM. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy is far more sensitive, enabling detection of spike protein to sub-picomolar concentrations. Control experiments performed using scrambled aptamers and using bovine serum albumin as an analyte show that this apta-sensing approach is both sensitive and selective, with no appreciable response observed for any controls. Overall, these proof-of-principle results demonstrate that SERS-based aptasensors hold great promise for development into rapid, point-of-use antigen detection systems, enabling mass testing without any need for reagents or laboratory expertise and equipment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamsyn Stanborough
- Biomolecular
Interaction Centre and School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
| | - Fiona M. Given
- Biomolecular
Interaction Centre and School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
| | - Barbara Koch
- Protein
Science and Engineering, Callaghan Innovation, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
| | - Campbell R. Sheen
- Protein
Science and Engineering, Callaghan Innovation, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
| | - André Buzas Stowers-Hull
- MacDiarmid
Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Massey University, Palmerston
North 4442, New Zealand
| | - Mark R. Waterland
- MacDiarmid
Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Massey University, Palmerston
North 4442, New Zealand
| | - Deborah L. Crittenden
- Biomolecular
Interaction Centre and School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gimpel AL, Katsikis G, Sha S, Maloney AJ, Hong MS, Nguyen TNT, Wolfrum J, Springs SL, Sinskey AJ, Manalis SR, Barone PW, Braatz RD. Analytical methods for process and product characterization of recombinant adeno-associated virus-based gene therapies. MOLECULAR THERAPY-METHODS & CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT 2021; 20:740-754. [PMID: 33738328 PMCID: PMC7940698 DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2021.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The optimization of upstream and downstream processes for production of recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) with consistent quality depends on the ability to rapidly characterize critical quality attributes (CQAs). In the context of rAAV production, the virus titer, capsid content, and aggregation are identified as potential CQAs, affecting the potency, purity, and safety of rAAV-mediated gene therapy products. Analytical methods to measure these attributes commonly suffer from long turnaround times or low throughput for process development, although rapid, high-throughput methods are beginning to be developed and commercialized. These methods are not yet well established in academic or industrial practice, and supportive data are scarce. Here, we review both established and upcoming analytical methods for the quantification of rAAV quality attributes. In assessing each method, we highlight the progress toward rapid, at-line characterization of rAAV. Furthermore, we identify that a key challenge for transitioning from traditional to newer methods is the scarcity of academic and industrial experience with the latter. This literature review serves as a guide for the selection of analytical methods targeting quality attributes for rapid, high-throughput process characterization during process development of rAAV-mediated gene therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas L Gimpel
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.,Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Georgios Katsikis
- Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Sha Sha
- Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Center for Biomedical Innovation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Andrew John Maloney
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Moo Sun Hong
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Tam N T Nguyen
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Jacqueline Wolfrum
- Center for Biomedical Innovation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Stacy L Springs
- Center for Biomedical Innovation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Anthony J Sinskey
- Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Center for Biomedical Innovation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Scott R Manalis
- Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Paul W Barone
- Center for Biomedical Innovation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Richard D Braatz
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.,Center for Biomedical Innovation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|