Single course of high dose dexamethasone is more effective than conventional prednisolone therapy in the treatment of primary newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia

Treatment outcomes and adherence to treatment in patients with immune thrombocytopenia in two Ethiopian teaching hospitals: a retrospective cohort study

The treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is challenging and treatment outcomes depend on numerous unknown and patient-specific factors. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone of ITP treatment, but they are associated with many side effects. In this retrospective cohort study, treatment outcomes and treatment adherence in patients with ITP were investigated in 214 ITP patients from November 15, 2022 to March 15, 2023. Multinomial regression analysis models were used to identify predictive factors for treatment outcomes. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Most study participants were female 161 (75.5%), and the majority 172 (80.4%) of them were taking prednisolone only. In terms of treatment adherence, 178 (83.2%) of the study participants adhered well to their ITP medications. The complete response rate at 3 months was 139 (65.0%). Predictive factors for partial response were increased negative impact of ITP on health-related quality of life (AOR = 1.221, 95% CI 1.096-1.360), being treated at Tikur Abessa Sepcialazed Hospital (AOR = 0.431, 95% CI 0.197-0.941) and the presence of heavy menstrual bleeding (AOR = 2.255, 95% CI 0.925-5.497) compared to patients with complete response. Hepatitis B virus-infected ITP patients (AOR = 0.052, 95% CI 0.004-0.621) were also a predictive factor for no response compared to complete response.

Prednisone vs high-dose dexamethasone in newly diagnosed adult primary immune thrombocytopenia: a randomized trial

ABSTRACT

A debate exists regarding which type of corticosteroids (standard-dose prednisone [PDN] or high-dose dexamethasone [HD-DXM]) is the best first-line treatment for adult patients with newly diagnosed untreated primary immune thrombocytopenia (pITP). An ad hoc study compared PDN with HD-DXM in newly diagnosed untreated patients with pITP (aged ≥18 but ≤80 years, platelet count of ≤20 or >20 but <50 × 109/L, and bleeding score of ≥8). Patients were randomised to receive PDN 1 mg/kg per day from days 0 to 28 (Arm A) or HD-DXM 40 mg per day for 4 days, every 14 days, for 3 consecutive courses (Arm B). Fifty-nine of 113 patients (52.2%) were randomized to Arm A and 54 of 113 (47.8%) to Arm B. In evaluable patients, total initial responses (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], minimal response [MR]) were 44 of 56 (78.57%) in Arm A and 46 of 49 (93.88%) in Arm B at days 42 and 46, respectively (P = 0.0284). Total final responses (at day 180 from initial response) were 26 of 43 (60.47%) in Arm A and 23 of 39 (58.97%) in Arm B (P = 0.8907). Total persistent responses (at 12 months from initial response) were 25 of 31 (80.65%) in Arm A and 20 of 36 (55.56%) in Arm B (P = 0.0292). Seven relapses occurred. Median follow-up was 44.4 months. Overall survival was 100% at 48 months, overall disease-free survival was 81.11% at 48 months from day 180. PDN and pulsed HD-DXM were well tolerated; HD-DXM allows effective initial responses but less long lasting than PDN. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00657410.

İmmün trombositopenili erişkin hastalarda birinci basamak tedavide yüksek doz metilprednizolonun etkinliği

Purpose: We aimed to compare the efficacy of high-dose methylprednisolone (HDP) with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and conventional prednisolone (CDP) as a first-line therapy in adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 140 adult patients with either previously untreated newly diagnosed ITP (n=51) or persistent or chronic ITP (n=22/n=67)) with episodes. Patients with a platelet count

Management of immune thrombocytopenia: 2022 update of Korean experts recommendations

Despite the availability of therapies to treat patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), there is currently little data from randomized trials to assist clinicians in managing patients. The evidence-based guidelines of the Korean Society of Hematology Aplastic Anemia Working Party (KSHAAWP) are intended to support patients and physicians in the management of ITP. Experts from the KSHAAWP discussed and described this guideline according to the current treatment situation for ITP in Korea and finalized the guidelines. The expert panel recommended the management of ITP in adult and pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, persistent, and chronic disease refractory to first-line therapy with minor bleeding. Management approaches include observation and administration of corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, anti-D immunoglobulin, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists. Currently, evidence supporting strong recommendations for various management approaches is lacking. Therefore, a large focus was placed on shared decision-making, especially regarding second-line treatment.

Very Early Increased Platelet Count within a Week after Initiation of High-Dose Dexamethasone Treatment Is Associated with Long-Term Response in Newly Diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenia Patients

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of high-dose dexamethasone (HD-DXM) treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), we retrospectively analysed 36 newly diagnosed ITP patients treated with HD-DXM as a first-line treatment. An initial response was obtained in 23 (63.9%) patients, including 11 with a complete response (CR) and 12 with a partial response (PR). Six months after HD-DXM treatment, 26 of 33 (78.8%) evaluable patients achieved objective responses, including 18 CR and 8 PR. Among 13 patients without initial response, very early increased platelet count within a week (VEIP) was observed in 7 patients, 5 (71.4%) of whom achieved a response at 6 months. In 29 patients who had available platelet count within a week, patients showing VEIP revealed longer survival than those who did not (p = 0.026). HD-DXM was an effective treatment for newly diagnosed ITP patients. VEIP after HD-DXM treatment initiation was associated with a long-term objective response in newly diagnosed ITP patients.

Corticosteroid overuse in adults with immune thrombocytopenia: Cause for concern

Corticosteroids remain a crucial component of first-line therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) due to low cost, high initial response rates, and acceptable short-term tolerability. However, extended and recurrent use of corticosteroids is associated with substantial toxicity. Survey studies indicate that >95% of patients with ITP treated with corticosteroids report adverse effects, more than one-third of whom require reduction or discontinuation of treatment. In light of the heavy treatment burden of prolonged corticosteroid exposure, clinical practice guidelines recommend limiting corticosteroid treatment to no more than 6 weeks in adults with ITP receiving initial therapy. For patients who require subsequent therapy, clinical practice guidelines recommend treatments more suitable for long-term disease control such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists, rituximab, other immune-modulating medications, or splenectomy, rather than repeated courses of corticosteroids. Despite these recommendations, real-world evidence suggests that corticosteroids remain the most frequently used treatment for adults with ITP, not only in the first line, but also in the second and third line. In this review, we summarize evidence on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of corticosteroids; discuss the problem of overuse; and suggest strategies for curtailing the excessive use of corticosteroids in adults with ITP.

The Efficacy of High-Dose Dexamethasone vs. Other Treatments for Newly Diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Meta-Analysis

Objective: To compare the therapeutic efficacies of high dose dexamethasone, prednisone and rituximab in combination with dexamethasone for newly diagnosed ITP (Immune Thrombocytopenia, ITP) patients. Methods and results: Relevant publications for this study were obtained by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CNKI (National Knowledge Infrastructure, CNKI) databases following the PRISMA guidelines. A total of, 15 publications were retrieved that contained sufficient data from 1,362 patients for high quality analysis of this study endpoints. Data analysis was carried out using Stata 11.0 software. The primary outcomes were OR (Overall Response, OR) at 1 month after intervention and SR at 6 and 12 months. The secondary outcomes were AEs and relapse. There were no differences in the OR, while the SR was higher at 6 months (p = 0.001) as well as 12 months (p < 0.001) in the rituximab + dexamethasone group. In addition, the incidences of AEs (p = 0.008) were also higher in the rituximab + dexamethasone group. Dexamethasone was superior to prednisone based on OR (p = 0.006). We found no differences in SR at 6 months between dexamethasone and prednisone but SR at 12 months was higher in the dexamethasone group (p = 0.014). The relapse rate was higher in the high dose dexamethasone group compared to the rituximab + dexamethasone group (p = 0.042). Conclusion: This demonstrated that new treatment options such as Rituximab + dexamethasone, could be a good alternative to traditional therapy in improving long-term response and reducing the rate of relapse. However, further studies are required on the increased risk of AEs associated with Rituximab + dexamethasone.

Clinical overview and practical considerations for optimizing romiplostim therapy in patients with immune thrombocytopenia

The fundamental treatment goal for patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is reduced or ameliorated bleeding. Although various treatment options exist for the management of ITP, recent advances have led to the approval of three thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs; romiplostim, eltrombopag, and avatrombopag) in the United States and European Union. Current treatment guidelines for ITP indicate that medical therapy is preferred over surgical therapy and support the use of TPO-RAs as early as 3 months after disease onset. More recent data are available on the use of romiplostim in patients who have had ITP for <1 year, and romiplostim is now indicated for the treatment of adults who have not responded adequately to initial treatment, as well as children aged ≥1 year who have had ITP for ≥6 months. Here we review the role of romiplostim in the management of ITP, with a focus on efficacy and safety data, emerging data on early use (beginning within 3 months of disease onset) and treatment-free remission, and practical considerations for optimal management of ITP.

High-dose dexamethasone plus recombinant human thrombopoietin vs high-dose dexamethasone alone as frontline treatment for newly diagnosed adult primary immune thrombocytopenia: A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose dexamethasone (HD-DXM) plus recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), vs HD-DXM alone in newly diagnosed adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive DXM plus rhTPO or DXM monotherapy. Another 4-day course of DXM was repeated if response was not achieved by day 10 in both arms. One hundred patients in the HD-DXM plus rhTPO arm and 96 patients in the HD-DXM monotherapy arm were included in the full analysis set. So, HD-DXM plus rhTPO resulted in a higher incidence of initial response (89.0% vs 66.7%, P < .001) and complete response (CR, 75.0% vs 42.7%, P < .001) compared with HD-DXM monotherapy. Response rate at 6 months was also higher in the HD-DXM plus rhTPO arm than that in the HD-DXM monotherapy arm (51.0% vs 36.5%, P = .02; sustained CR: 46.0% vs 32.3%, P = .043). Throughout the follow-up period, the overall duration of response was greater in the HD-DXM plus rhTPO arm compared to the HD-DXM monotherapy arm (P = .04), as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The study drugs were generally well tolerated. In conclusion, the combination of HD-DXM with rhTPO significantly improved the initial response and yielded favorable SR in newly diagnosed ITP patients, thus could be further validated as a frontline treatment for ITP. This study is registered as clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01734044.

Evaluation of treatment plan by three-period pulses of high-dose dexamethasone among patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia on platelet count response and adverse events: A randomized Clinical trial

Background

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) decreases platelet count as well as increases the risk of bleeding due to platelet destruction in an autoimmune disorder. For many years, prednisone (PDN) has been the standard first-line treatment in ITP practical guidelines. The current randomized clinical trial compared the efficacy of treatments between three-pulse high-dose dexamethasone (HD-DXM) and the traditional PDN regimen among untreated patients with ITP in accordance with platelet count responses and adverse events.

Materials and Methods

We randomly assigned eligible patients with ITP to receive PDN or a three-pulse regimen of HD-DXM. In the HD-DXM group, 40 mg of DXM was administered intravenously for 4 consecutive days and was repeated in 14-day intervals for three pulses of treatment. Patients in the PDN group received 1.0 mg/kg of PDN orally per day for 4 consecutive weeks. The Mann-Whitney test was used for comparing the median of platelet count between the two groups, and logistic regression was used to evaluate odds ratio (OR) in the response rate of platelet count between the two groups. Blindness was not applied for both patients and physicians.

Results

The initial response rate of platelet count in the HD-DXM group was significantly higher than the PDN group (P < 0.05). According to the results of logistic regression, the initial and sustained response (SR) rate of platelet count in the HD-DXM group was significantly higher than the PDN group (OR: 5.68 and 4.17, respectively, P < 0.05). In fact, in the HD-DXM group, more patients reached SR after the 8-month follow-up (88.9% vs. 66.6%, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In patients with ITP disease who have not received any kind of treatment, HD-DXM was more effective than conventional PDN therapy.

American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Despite an increase in the number of therapies available to treat patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), there are minimal data from randomized trials to assist physicians with the management of patients.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about the management of ITP.

METHODS

In 2015, ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 8 adult clinical experts, 5 pediatric clinical experts, 2 methodologists with expertise in ITP, and 2 patient representatives. The panel was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The panel reviewed the ASH 2011 guideline recommendations and prioritized questions. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including evidence-to-decision frameworks, to appraise evidence (up to May 2017) and formulate recommendations.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 21 recommendations covering management of ITP in adults and children with newly diagnosed, persistent, and chronic disease refractory to first-line therapy who have non-life-threatening bleeding. Management approaches included: observation, corticosteroids, IV immunoglobulin, anti-D immunoglobulin, rituximab, splenectomy, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a lack of evidence to support strong recommendations for various management approaches. In general, strategies that avoided medication side effects were favored. A large focus was placed on shared decision-making, especially with regard to second-line therapy. Future research should apply standard corticosteroid-dosing regimens, report patient-reported outcomes, and include cost-analysis evaluations.

Blood Cell Disorders and the Nervous System

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of neurologic complications of common and rare blood cell disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

A growing number of preventive treatment options are available for stroke in sickle cell disease. Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and immune thrombocytopenia can lead to stroke. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura frequently causes neurologic symptoms and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a patient with neurologic symptoms, thrombocytopenia, and hemolytic anemia. Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia are rare causes of stroke.

SUMMARY

This article discusses sickle cell disease and the most recent advances in stroke preventive therapy as well as neurologic complications of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, immune thrombocytopenia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia.

High-dose dexamethasone therapy as the initial treatment for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura

There is a controversy which short term high dose dexamethasone therapy (HDD) or standard dose prednisolone therapy as the initial treatment leads to long term efficacy in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) patients. We conducted a multicenter, prospective trial to determine the efficacy and safety of short-term HDD in ITP patients aged 18-80 years with platelet counts of < 20 × 10⁹/l, or < 50 × 10⁹/l and bleeding symptoms. The primary endpoints are the proportion of complete response (CR) plus partial response (R) on day 180 after the completion of the 46-day HDD. Twenty-three patients were enrolled. Test for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) was positive for 6 patients and negative for 17 patients. In positive patients, 5 were received successful H. pylori eradication therapy. The proportion of CR + R was 60.9% (14/23) with 90% confidence interval of 41.7-77.8%. For patients with positive H. pylori and successful eradication, the proportion of CR + R was 80.0% (4/5). There was one grade 4 adverse event. Although we have enrolled relatively old, severe ITP patients with a median age of 63 years in this study, the efficacy was comparable to the reported clinical trials with HDD therapy.

Evidence-based management of immune thrombocytopenia: ASH guideline update

In 1996 and 2011, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) supported efforts to create guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). These guidelines used different approaches to arrive at recommendations for testing and treatment. Despite differences in methodology, in both cases there was a paucity of randomized trials to inform recommendations. As data on the diagnosis and management of ITP expands, the ASH Committee on Quality is dedicated to maintaining updated guidelines representing recent evidence and guideline methodology. Here, we will review the updated ASH guidelines on ITP with a focus on recommendations with new understanding and future research to close knowledge gaps.

Management of newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia: can we change outcomes?

Immune thrombocytopenia resulting from antibody-mediated platelet destruction combined with impaired platelet production is a common cause of thrombocytopenia. The decision to treat newly diagnosed patients is based on several factors including ceasing hemorrhagic manifestations, increasing the platelet count, prevention of bleeding, and inducing remission. Current standard first-line therapy is a course of corticosteroids. Although this treatment paradigm increases the platelet count in the majority of patients, a high percentage relapse after discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy. For this reason, intensification of first-line therapy that results in superior long-term remission rates would be desirable. This manuscript focuses primarily on adults with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), highlighting pediatric data and practice when applicable. The primary aim is to outline upfront strategies for treatment-naive patients with ITP to enhance remission rates, taking into account assessment of the risks and benefits of these approaches.

Management of newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia: can we change outcomes?

Immune thrombocytopenia resulting from antibody-mediated platelet destruction combined with impaired platelet production is a common cause of thrombocytopenia. The decision to treat newly diagnosed patients is based on several factors including ceasing hemorrhagic manifestations, increasing the platelet count, prevention of bleeding, and inducing remission. Current standard first-line therapy is a course of corticosteroids. Although this treatment paradigm increases the platelet count in the majority of patients, a high percentage relapse after discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy. For this reason, intensification of first-line therapy that results in superior long-term remission rates would be desirable. This manuscript focuses primarily on adults with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), highlighting pediatric data and practice when applicable. The primary aim is to outline upfront strategies for treatment-naive patients with ITP to enhance remission rates, taking into account assessment of the risks and benefits of these approaches.

Comparison of up-front treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia -a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Corticosteroids such as prednisolone and dexamethasone have been established as up-front therapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia. Recent studies have indicated that other treatments such as rituximab or thrombopoietin receptor agonist can also be effective choices. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to establish a clinically meaningful hierarchy of efficacy and safety of treatments for newly diagnosed primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults. Randomized controlled trials evaluating medical treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia were included. Reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The main outcome was the sustained response (platelet count >30×10⁹/L for 3–6 months after completion of treatments), while overall response (platelet count >30×10⁹/L for 2–4 weeks after initiation of the up-front treatment) and therapy-related adverse events were the secondary endpoints. A total of 21 randomized controlled trials (1898 patients) were included in this study. Our main findings were a significantly better sustained response in the recombinant human thrombopoietin+dexamethasone and rituximab+dexamethasone arms compared to those of conventional therapies (prednisolone and dexamethasone monotherapy). Moreover, recombinant human thrombopoietin+dexamethasone and +prednisolone improved early overall response compared to prednisolone, dexamethasone, and rituximab-containing regimens. Therapy-related adverse events showed similar profiles and were tolerable in all treatment arms. Regimens containing recombinant human thrombopoietin agonist may be beneficial up-front therapies in addition to the conventional corticosteroid monotherapies. Future head-to-head trials including these regimens and rituximab-containing treatments are necessary in order to overcome the limitations of the small number in our study and determine the most suitable initial therapies for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia.

Efficacy of Dexamethasone for Acute Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia Compared to Prednisolone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Corticosteroids have been established as first-line therapy in acute primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and the clinical guidelines recommend either dexamethasone (Dex) or prednisolone (PSL). The types and dosages of corticosteroids, however, have not yet been determined, because previous randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing Dex and PSL showed controversial results in terms of efficacy. To understand and interpret all available evidence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. The main outcome measure was the incidence of sustained response (SR; platelet count >30 × 10 ⁹ /L for 6 months without concomitant treatments after the completion of the final therapies). Eight RCTs (totaling 704 patients) were included in this study. The incidence of SR showed no significant difference, while it was significantly higher in the Dex arm when used with posttherapy (more than one course of Dex or tapering corticosteroids added; risk ratio [RR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-2.41; p  < 0.01). A single course of Dex showed no significant difference. The overall response (platelet >30 × 10 ⁹ /L) at day 28 was significantly improved in the Dex arm (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.22; p  = 0.03) and Dex with posttherapy suppressed long-term relapse (RR of nonevent, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59; p  < 0.01). There were significantly fewer adverse events in the Dex arm (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.37-0.55; p  < 0.01). Use of Dex with posttherapy instead of PSL may be more beneficial as the initial therapy. Studies comparing Dex with other new strategies are essential to determine the most suitable therapeutic regimens for acute ITP.

High-dose dexamethasone compared with prednisone for previously untreated primary immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether high-dose dexamethasone has long-term efficacy and safety in previously untreated patients with immune thrombocytopenia is unclear. We did a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomised trials to establish the effect of high-dose dexamethasone compared with prednisone for long-term platelet count response.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library Database for papers published from 1970 to July, 2016, and abstracts from American Society of Hematology annual meetings published from 2004 to 2015 for randomised trials comparing different corticosteroid regimens for patients with previously untreated immune thrombocytopenia who achieved a platelet count response. Trials that compared corticosteroids exclusively with other interventions were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall (platelets >30 × 10⁹/L) and complete (platelets >100 × 10⁹/L) platelet count response at 6 months with high-dose dexamethasone compared with standard-dose prednisone. Children and adults were analysed separately. Estimates of effect were pooled with a random-effects model.

FINDINGS

Nine randomised trials (n=1138) were included. Of those, five (n=533) compared one to three cycles of dexamethasone (40 mg per day for 4 days) with prednisone (1 mg per kg) for 14-28 days followed by dose tapering in adults. We found no difference in overall platelet count response at 6 months (pooled proportions 54% vs 43%, relative risk [RR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·79-1·71; p=0·44). At 14 days, overall platelet count response was higher with dexamethasone (79% vs 59%, RR 1·22, 95% CI 1·00-1·49; p=0·048). The dexamethasone group had fewer reported toxicities. Long-term response rates were similar when the data were analysed by cumulative corticosteroid dose over the course of treatment. No difference in initial platelet count response was observed with different high-dose corticosteroid regimens in children.

INTERPRETATION

In adults with previously untreated immune thrombocytopenia, high-dose dexamethasone did not improve durable platelet count responses compared with standard-dose prednisone. High-dose dexamethasone might be preferred over prednisone for patients with severe immune thrombocytopenia who require a rapid rise in platelet count.

FUNDING

Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and Canadian Blood Services, and Health Canada.

Have splenectomy rate and main outcomes of ITP changed after the introduction of new treatments? A monocentric study in the outpatient setting during 35 years

In the last years, rituximab (RTX) and agonists of the thrombopoietin receptor (TPO-R) eltrombopag and romiplostim have provided new treatment options in persistent and chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Here, we analyzed the changes in therapeutic choices over time and their impact on clinical outcomes in a cohort of 557 ITP outpatients followed at the "L. and A. Seràgnoli" Institute of Hematology, Bologna, Italy, from 1980 to 2015. Overall 397 patients (71%) required front-line corticosteroids, mainly prednisone. Over the decades, splenectomy was delayed from second to third-line, but was steadily used in around 15-25% of patients refractory or relapsing after first-line treatment. Consensually, RTX and TPO-R agonists emerged as second and third-line therapy of choice, respectively. Splenectomy was associated with the best response rates and the lower incidences of relapse, while the relapse rate after RTX was comparable to that observed with corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents. The introduction of TPO-R agonists gave an alternative to the administration of immunosuppressive drugs and probably contributed to moderate the incidence of infectious complications that remained stable over the decades, despite an increasing use of RTX from the 2000s onwards. Overall responses were similar over time, with over 97% achieving a response in all time-periods. However, the cumulative risk of bleeding significantly decreased [14.3% (1980-89) vs. 7% (1990-99) vs. 5.6% (2000-09) vs. 0.2% (2010-15)] (P < 0.001), mainly thanks to the optimization of front-line corticosteroids therapy and to the wider availability of second and third-line therapies.

[Efficacy and safety of high-dose dexamethasone combined with rhTPO for newly diagnosed adults with severe immune thrombocytopenia]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high dose dexamethasone combined with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in adults with severe newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

METHODS

Forty-eight adult patients with severe ITP were randomized into two groups, experimental group and control group. The patients in experimental group were given high-dose dexamethasone combined with rhTPO treatment, the patients in control group were given single high-dose dexamethasone treatment. Platelet count, platelet increase, as well as the overall response rate were strictly observed in the process. At the same time, the patient's drug tolerance and any adverse drug reactions were observed.

RESULTS

The platelet counts and platelet increase of the patients in experimental group were significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05) at day 3, 7, 14, 30. There was no significant difference in overall response rates between the two groups (34.8% vs 36.0%, 56.5% vs 48.0%, P>0.05) at day 3, 7. The overall response rates of experimental group at day 14, 30 were significantly higher than that of control group (91.3% vs 68.0%, 82.6% vs 52.0%, P<0.05). The muscle aches occurred in one patient in experimental group which was self-recovery without special treatment.

CONCLUSION

rhTPO combined with high-dose dexamethasone could rapidly increase the platelet count, reduce the risk of bleeding, and prolonge the effect with a low incidence of tolerable adverse events compared to single high-dose dexamethasone. rhTPO combined with high-dose dexamethasone could be a new therapeutic choice for severe primary ITP.

[Efficacy and safety of high-dose dexamethasone combined with rhTPO for newly diagnosed adults with severe immune thrombocytopenia]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high dose dexamethasone combined with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in adults with severe newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

METHODS

Forty-eight adult patients with severe ITP were randomized into two groups, experimental group and control group. The patients in experimental group were given high-dose dexamethasone combined with rhTPO treatment, the patients in control group were given single high-dose dexamethasone treatment. Platelet count, platelet increase, as well as the overall response rate were strictly observed in the process. At the same time, the patient's drug tolerance and any adverse drug reactions were observed.

RESULTS

The platelet counts and platelet increase of the patients in experimental group were significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05) at day 3, 7, 14, 30. There was no significant difference in overall response rates between the two groups (34.8% vs 36.0%, 56.5% vs 48.0%, P>0.05) at day 3, 7. The overall response rates of experimental group at day 14, 30 were significantly higher than that of control group (91.3% vs 68.0%, 82.6% vs 52.0%, P<0.05). The muscle aches occurred in one patient in experimental group which was self-recovery without special treatment.

CONCLUSION

rhTPO combined with high-dose dexamethasone could rapidly increase the platelet count, reduce the risk of bleeding, and prolonge the effect with a low incidence of tolerable adverse events compared to single high-dose dexamethasone. rhTPO combined with high-dose dexamethasone could be a new therapeutic choice for severe primary ITP.

Bleeding complications in immune thrombocytopenia

Bleeding manifestations in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) range from mild skin bruises to life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Severe bleeding is distinctly uncommon when the platelet count is >30 × 109/L and usually only occurs when the platelet count falls <10 × 109/L. Based on estimates from clinical studies, ITP registries and administrative databases, the frequency of ICH in patients with ITP is ∼0.5% in children and 1.5% in adults. Estimates of severe (non-ICH) bleeding are difficult to obtain because of the lack of standardized case definitions; the lack of a universally accepted, ITP-specific bleeding assessment tool; and the omission of reporting bleeding outcomes in many clinical studies. In practice, the presence of bleeding should dictate whether or not treatment is needed because many patients, especially children, can be safely managed with observation alone. Guiding principles for the management of ITP, based on the bleeding risk are: (1) Decide when treatment is needed and when it can safely be withheld; (2) for patients with chronic ITP, use the least toxic treatment at the lowest dose; (3) emergency treatment of severe thrombocytopenia-associated bleeding requires combination therapy; and (4) early aggressive therapy may result in durable platelet count responses.

Remission and platelet responses with romiplostim in primary immune thrombocytopenia: final results from a phase 2 study

In anecdotal reports, some patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) maintained platelet counts after discontinuing romiplostim. Here, we examined rates of platelet response (≥50 × 10(9) /l), remission, splenectomy and adverse events in patients with primary ITP duration ≤6 months who were treated with romiplostim for ≤12 months. The starting dose of romiplostim was 1 μg/kg; concomitant and rescue treatments were permitted to maintain platelet counts. Patients with platelet counts ≥50 × 10(9) /l at the end of 12 months entered a dose taper in which the romiplostim dose was decreased as long as platelet counts were maintained. Remission (platelet count ≥50 × 10(9) /l for 24 consecutive weeks with no ITP treatments) was evaluated in patients once romiplostim was discontinued. Over the 12 months, a high response rate (>90%) was observed. Platelet response occurred quickly (median, ~2 weeks) and was observed for a cumulative median of 11 months. Remission was observed in 24 patients (32%); there were no significantly predictors of remission. Most (20/24) patients had remission start before the forced taper. No new safety signals were identified. Thus, in patients with early-stage ITP, romiplostim was well tolerated and induced rapid responses, with remission occurring in approximately one-third of patients (NCT01143038, Amgen 20080435).

Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIg) Utilization in Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): A Multi-Center, Retrospective Review

Introduction

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is an immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) therapy, which is associated with toxicities, limited availability, increasing utilization, and high cost. This study aimed to assess short- and long-term IVIg utilization in patients with ITP at two tertiary care centers in Ontario, Canada, to determine the proportion of IVIg used in ITP compared with all usage, and to forecast IVIg demand in ITP.

Methods

Records from all adult ITP patients who received IVIg between January 1, 2003, and September 30, 2012, at Hamilton Health Sciences and London Health Sciences Centre were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

During the study period, 383 adult ITP patients (mean age 51.3 years) received a total of 2,098 IVIg infusions (London 547 infusions in 150 patients; Hamilton 1,551 infusions in 233 patients). ITP accounted for 5.6 and 9.1 % of all IVIg usage in London and Hamilton, respectively. The treatments included 264 (53.7 %) acute, 172 (35.0 %) short-term, and 56 (11.4 %) long-term treatments. The amounts of IVIg used for short- and long-term treatment of ITP are forecasted to be approximately 5,000 and 11,000 g per year, respectively, up to 2018. Together, these two centers represent 19.9 % of the provincial IVIg utilization. Assuming similar patient populations and practice patterns in Ontario, the overall provincial cost of IVIg use in ITP may be as high as $5 million annually.

Conclusion

Short- and long-term IVIg utilization for ITP will remain an expensive resource within the Ontario provincial health care system. Physicians and policy makers should reflect on the impact of treating ITP with IVIg and should consider alternatives, where appropriate, to improve patient quality of life and decrease economic costs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40801-015-0009-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.