1
|
van Rens MF, Hugill K, Francia AL, Mahmah MA, Al Shadad ABJ, Chiuco IC, Garcia KL. Closed intravenous systems for central vascular access: A difference maker for CLABSI rates in neonates? J Vasc Access 2023; 24:1390-1397. [PMID: 35435032 PMCID: PMC10714695 DOI: 10.1177/11297298221085480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infants in neonatal units are susceptible to numerous potential iatrogenic risks. One key concern is central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI). To ensure patient safety and reduce the incidence of CLABSI toward zero, numerous evidence-based clinical interventions and product innovations have been implemented. Nevertheless, sustaining zero CLABSI for sustained periods remains challenging. AIM The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact on CLABSI rates of introducing a preassembled closed intravenous (IV) administration set in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS This was a retrospective observational analysis of routinely collected anonymized IV therapy infection data in a NICU. The study period was from January 2019 through June 2020. RESULTS Nine-hundred eighty five patients with a Epicutaneo-Caval Catheter (ECC) were included (456 legacy IV set, 529 closed IV set). Patient demographics were comparable between the two groups. ECC dwell time was the only IV characteristic associated (p = 0.04) with CLABSI. Mann-Whitney U-test demonstrated significant differences between the two sets for CLABSI complication events (p = 0.031). Prior to using the closed IV administration sets (January 2019-September 2019) the mean monthly CLABSI rate was 2.87 (/1000 device days). This figure declined to 0.22 (/1000 device days) afterwards (October 2019-June 2020). Zero CLABSIs were observed during January to June 2020. CONCLUSIONS Utilization of a pre-assembled closed IV administration set was associated with a reduction in CLABSI rates. The study results suggest that using a pre-assembled closed IV set concurrently with evidence-based central line infection control interventions can help attain extended periods of zero CLABSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matheus F.P.T. van Rens
- Director of Nursing and Neonatal Vascular Access Lead, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Women’s Wellness and Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Kevin Hugill
- Director of Nursing Education, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Airene L.V. Francia
- Vascular Access and Neonatal Transport Team Coordinator, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Women’s Wellness and Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Mohamad Adnan Mahmah
- Senior Consultant Critical Care, QI lead, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Women’s Wellness and Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Afaf Boulous J Al Shadad
- Senior Consultant Critical Care, Infection Control Lead, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Women’s Wellness and Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | | | - Krisha L.P. Garcia
- Nurse Educator, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Women’s Wellness and Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blot S, Ruppé E, Harbarth S, Asehnoune K, Poulakou G, Luyt CE, Rello J, Klompas M, Depuydt P, Eckmann C, Martin-Loeches I, Povoa P, Bouadma L, Timsit JF, Zahar JR. Healthcare-associated infections in adult intensive care unit patients: Changes in epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and contributions of new technologies. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2022; 70:103227. [PMID: 35249794 PMCID: PMC8892223 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk for healthcare-acquired infections (HAI) due to the high prevalence of invasive procedures and devices, induced immunosuppression, comorbidity, frailty and increased age. Over the past decade we have seen a successful reduction in the incidence of HAI related to invasive procedures and devices. However, the rate of ICU-acquired infections remains high. Within this context, the ongoing emergence of new pathogens, further complicates treatment and threatens patient outcomes. Additionally, the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic highlighted the challenge that an emerging pathogen provides in adapting prevention measures regarding both the risk of exposure to caregivers and the need to maintain quality of care. ICU nurses hold a special place in the prevention and management of HAI as they are involved in basic hygienic care, steering and implementing quality improvement initiatives, correct microbiological sampling, and aspects antibiotic stewardship. The emergence of more sensitive microbiological techniques and our increased knowledge about interactions between critically ill patients and their microbiota are leading us to rethink how we define HAIs and best strategies to diagnose, treat and prevent these infections in the ICU. This multidisciplinary expert review, focused on the ICU setting, will summarise the recent epidemiology of ICU-HAI, discuss the place of modern microbiological techniques in their diagnosis, review operational and epidemiological definitions and redefine the place of several controversial preventive measures including antimicrobial-impregnated medical devices, chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths, catheter dressings and chlorhexidine-based mouthwashes. Finally, general guidance is suggested that may reduce HAI incidence and especially outbreaks in ICUs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn Blot
- Dept. of Internal Medicine & Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Etienne Ruppé
- INSERM, IAME UMR 1137, University of Paris, France; Department of Bacteriology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Stephan Harbarth
- Infection Control Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Karim Asehnoune
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôtel-Dieu, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Garyphalia Poulakou
- 3(rd) Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Sotiria General Hospital of Athens, Greece
| | - Charles-Edouard Luyt
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France; INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Jordi Rello
- Vall d'Hebron Institut of Research (VHIR) and Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enferemedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael Klompas
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, United States; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - Pieter Depuydt
- Intensive Care Department, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Christian Eckmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Peine, Medical University Hannover, Germany
| | - Ignacio Martin-Loeches
- Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Hospital Clinic, Universidad de Barcelona, CIBERes, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Povoa
- Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, São Francisco Xavier Hospital, CHLO, Lisbon, Portugal; NOVA Medical School, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon Portugal; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Research Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, OUH Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lila Bouadma
- INSERM, IAME UMR 1137, University of Paris, France; Medical and Infectious Diseases ICU, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Francois Timsit
- INSERM, IAME UMR 1137, University of Paris, France; Medical and Infectious Diseases ICU, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Ralph Zahar
- INSERM, IAME UMR 1137, University of Paris, France; Microbiology, Infection Control Unit, GH Paris Seine Saint-Denis, APHP, Bobigny, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Verberk JD, van der Kooi TI, Derde LP, Bonten MJ, de Greeff SC, van Mourik MS. Do we need to change catheter-related bloodstream infection surveillance in the Netherlands? A qualitative study among infection prevention professionals. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046366. [PMID: 34408033 PMCID: PMC8375748 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are a common healthcare-associated infection and therefore targeted by surveillance programmes in many countries. Concerns, however, have been voiced regarding the reliability and construct validity of CRBSI surveillance and the connection with the current diagnostic procedures. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of infection control practitioners (ICPs) and medical professionals with the current CRBSI surveillance in the Netherlands and their suggestions for improvement. DESIGN Qualitative study using focus group discussions (FGDs) with ICPs and medical professionals separately, followed by semistructured interviews to investigate whether the points raised in the FGDs were recognised and confirmed by the interviewees. Analyses were performed using thematic analyses. SETTING Basic, teaching and academic hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS 24 ICPs and 9 medical professionals. RESULTS Main themes derived from experiences with current surveillance were (1) ICPs' doubt regarding the yield of surveillance given the low incidence of CRBSI, the high workload and IT problems; (2) the experienced lack of leadership and responsibility for recording information needed for surveillance and (3) difficulties with applying and interpreting the CRBSI definition. Suggestions were made to simplify the surveillance protocol, expand the follow-up and surveillance to homecare settings, simplify the definition and customise it for specific patient groups. Participants reported hoping for and counting on automatisation solutions to support future surveillance. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals several problems with the feasibility and acceptance of the current CRBSI surveillance and proposes several suggestions for improvement. This provides valuable input for future surveillance activities, thereby taking into account automation possibilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janneke Dm Verberk
- Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Tjallie Ii van der Kooi
- Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Lennie Pg Derde
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Jm Bonten
- Department of Medical Microbiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine C de Greeff
- Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike Sm van Mourik
- Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Heijting IE, Antonius TAJ, Tostmann A, de Boode WP, Hogeveen M, Hopman J. Sustainable neonatal CLABSI surveillance: consensus towards new criteria in the Netherlands. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2021; 10:31. [PMID: 33546759 PMCID: PMC7866773 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-021-00900-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are a main focus of infection prevention and control initiatives in neonatal care. Standardised surveillance of neonatal CLABSI enables intra- and interfacility comparisons which can contribute to quality improvement. To date, there is no national registration system for CLABSI in neonatal care in the Netherlands and several criteria are used for local monitoring of CLABSI incidence rates. To achieve standardised CLABSI surveillance we conducted a consensus procedure with regard to nationwide neonatal CLABSI surveillance criteria (SC). METHODS A modified Delphi consensus procedure for the development of nationwide neonatal CLABSI SC was performed between January 2016 and January 2017 in the Netherlands. An expert panel was formed by members of the Working Group on Neonatal Infectious Diseases of the Section of Neonatology of the Dutch Paediatric Society. The consensus procedure consisted of three expert panel rounds. RESULTS The expert panel achieved consensus on Dutch neonatal CLABSI SC. Neonatal CLABSI is defined as a bloodstream infection occurring more than 72 h after birth, associated with an indwelling central venous or arterial line and laboratory confirmed by one or more blood cultures. In addition, the blood culture finding should not be related to an infection at another site and one of the following criteria can be applied: 1. a bacterial or fungal pathogen is identified from one or more blood cultures; 2. the patient has clinical symptoms of sepsis and 2A) a common commensal is identified in two separate blood cultures or 2B) a common commensal is identified by one blood culture and C-reactive protein level is above 10 mg/L in the first 36 h following blood culture collection. CONCLUSIONS The newly developed Dutch neonatal CLABSI SC are concise, specified to the neonatal population and comply with a single blood culture policy in actual neonatal clinical practice. International agreement upon neonatal CLABSI SC is needed to identify best practices for infection prevention and control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I E Heijting
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Internal Postal Code 804, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - T A J Antonius
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Internal Postal Code 804, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Tostmann
- Unit of Hygiene and Infection Control, Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - W P de Boode
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Internal Postal Code 804, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M Hogeveen
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Internal Postal Code 804, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Hopman
- Department of Quality and Safety, Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Do Experts Understand Performance Measures? A Mixed-Methods Study of Infection Preventionists. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017; 39:71-76. [PMID: 29202884 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite a nationwide decline in CLABSI rates, individual hospital success in preventing CLABSI is variable. Difficulty in interpreting and applying complex CLABSI metrics may explain this problem. Therefore, we assessed expert interpretation of CLABSI quality data. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey PARTICIPANTS. Members of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Research Network (SRN) METHODS. We administered a 10-item test of CLABSI data comprehension. The primary outcome was percent correct of attempted questions pertaining to the CLABSI data. We also assessed expert perceptions of CLABSI reporting. RESULTS The response rate was 51% (n=67).Among experts, the average proportion of correct responses was 73% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69%-77%). Expert performance on unadjusted data was significantly better than risk-adjusted data (86% [95% CI, 81%-90%] vs 65% [95% CI, 60%-70%]; P<.001). Using a scale of 1 to 100 (0, never reliable; 100, always reliable), experts rated the reliability of CLABSI data as 61. Perceived reliability showed a significant inverse relationship with performance (r=-0.28; P=.03), and as interpretation of data improved, perceptions regarding reliability of those data decreased. Experts identified concerns regarding understanding and applying CLABSI definitions as barriers to care. CONCLUSIONS Significant variability in the interpretation of CLABSI data exists among experts. This finding is likely related to data complexity, particularly with respect to risk-adjusted data. Improvements appear necessary in data sharing and public policy efforts to account for this complexity. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:71-76.
Collapse
|
6
|
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Hugill
- Director of Nursing, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Strasheim W, Kock MM, Ueckermann V, Hoosien E, Dreyer AW, Ehlers MM. Surveillance of catheter-related infections: the supplementary role of the microbiology laboratory. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15:5. [PMID: 25566999 PMCID: PMC4297450 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-014-0743-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2014] [Accepted: 12/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden of catheter-related infections (CRIs) in developing countries is severe. In South Africa, a standardised surveillance definition does not exist and the collection of catheter days is challenging. The aim of the study was to provide baseline data on the prevalence of CRIs and to describe the epidemiology of CRI events within a tertiary academic hospital. METHODS Surveillance was laboratory-based and conducted for a six month period. A microbiologically confirmed CRBSI (MC-CRBSI) event was defined as the isolation of the same microorganism from the catheter and concomitant blood cultures (BCs), within 48 h of catheter removal, which were not related to an infection at another site. RESULTS A total of 508 catheters, removed from 332 patients, were processed by the laboratory, of which only 50% (253/508 removed from 143/332 patients) of the catheters were accompanied by BCs within 48 h. Sixty-five episodes of MC-CRBSI in 57 patients were detected, involving 71 catheters and 195 microbial isolates. The institutional prevalence rate was 3.7 episodes per 1 000 admissions and 5.8 episodes per 10 000 in-patient days. Catheter day data was collected in only six wards of the hospital. The pooled laboratory incidence was 10.1 MC-CRBSI episodes per 1 000 catheter days, whereas the hospital-based central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate was pooled at 5.7 episodes per 1 000 catheter days. The majority of patients had an underlying gastro-intestinal condition (33%; 19/56) with a non-tunnelled, triple-lumen central venous catheter, placed in the subclavian vein (38%; 27/71). The most predominant pathogen was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (28%; 55/195), followed by extensively-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (18%; 35/195). CONCLUSIONS Catheter-related infection prevention and control efforts require urgent attention, not only to keep patients safe from preventable harm, but to prevent the spread of multidrug resistant microorganisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilhelmina Strasheim
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
| | - Martha M Kock
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
- National Health Laboratory Service, Tshwane Academic Division, Pretoria, South Africa.
| | - Veronica Ueckermann
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
| | - Ebrahim Hoosien
- National Health Laboratory Service, Tshwane Academic Division, Pretoria, South Africa.
| | - Andries W Dreyer
- Centre for Tuberculosis, National Institute of Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - Marthie M Ehlers
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
- National Health Laboratory Service, Tshwane Academic Division, Pretoria, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|