Proposing and developing a National Institute for Forensic Toxicology in Ireland - transformation through education

The spectrum of expert reports on clinical biochemical toxicology and medicine from an Irish practice

The compounds which generated an expert opinion report in the area of medical toxicology in the period 1999 to 2015 are presented from the toxicological case files of a specialist in chemical pathology and general internal medicine. There were 132 different compounds from 86 cases. Alcohol was involved in 43%, drugs of abuse in 18.6%, volatile carbon compounds in 17.4%, metals in 9.3%, and carbon monoxide in 4.6%. Many compounds appeared once. The duty of the medical expert witness to provide an objective report for the court irrespective of the payer is stated. The addition of references from peer reviewed literature to substantiate the pros and cons of each case is recommended as a standard operating procedure in completing each report.

Fault lines in forensic medical toxicology in Ireland exposed through replies of pathologists and coroners to anonymous questionnaires

The attitudes and experiences of pathologists and coroners to the provision of biochemical forensic toxicology in the Republic of Ireland were determined using separate questionnaires to each group anonymously. Replies were received from 36/88 (41%) of pathologists and 19/71 (27%) of coroners. 37% of coroners considered that histopathologists give an adequate opinion in forensic toxicology yet 58% of pathologists reported that they did not have adequate access to expert medical interpretative toxicological opinion. For drug-drug interactions and metabolic diseases, 69% of pathologists were unhappy with the processes and 68% of coroner replies did not know if vitreous samples were used appropriately. There is a clear requirement for retraining of coroners and for the appointment of medical toxicology expertise to improve the quality of service for coroners.