1
|
Nelson AE. Multiple joint osteoarthritis (MJOA): What's in a name? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2024; 32:234-240. [PMID: 37984559 PMCID: PMC10922529 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the current state of the literature regarding multi-joint osteoarthritis (MJOA) and discuss important future directions. DESIGN A narrative review of the author's work and other key references on this topic with a focus on the Johnston County studies, definitions of MJOA and their impact, multi-site pain in osteoarthritis (OA), genetics and biomarkers in MJOA, and perspectives on future work. RESULTS MJOA is variably defined and lacks a clear consensus definition, making comprehensive study challenging. Involvement of both symptoms and structural changes of OA in multiple joints in an individual is common, but patterns vary by sex, race/ethnicity, and other factors. Outcomes (e.g., general health, function, falls, mortality) are negatively impacted by a greater whole-body OA burden. Recent genetic and biomarker studies including whole-body OA assessments have begun to shed some light on potentially unique factors in the MJOA population. CONCLUSIONS Consideration of MJOA is essential for ongoing study of OA phenotypes, epidemiology, risk factors, genetics, biomarkers, and outcomes, to fully understand and eventually limit the negative impact of OA burden on health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Nelson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sabbieti MG, Marchegiani A, Sufianov AA, Gabai VL, Shneider A, Agas D. P62/SQSTM1 beyond Autophagy: Physiological Role and Therapeutic Applications in Laboratory and Domestic Animals. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12040539. [PMID: 35455030 PMCID: PMC9025487 DOI: 10.3390/life12040539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Inflammation is the preceding condition for the development of mild and severe pathological conditions, including various forms of osteopenia, cancer, metabolic syndromes, neurological disorders, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular, lung diseases, etc., in human and animals. The inflammatory status is induced by multifarious intracellular signaling cascades, where cytokines, chemokines, arachidonic acid metabolites, adhesion molecules, immune cells and other components foster a “slow burn” at a local or systemic level. Assuming that countering inflammation limits the development of inflammation-based diseases, a series of new side-effects-free therapies was assessed in experimental and domestic animals. Within the targets of the drug candidates for quenching inflammation, an archetypal autophagic gear, the p62/sqstm1 protein, has currently earned attention from researchers. Intracellular p62 has been recently coined as a multi-task tool associated with autophagy, bone remodeling, bone marrow integrity, cancer progression, and the maintenance of systemic homeostasis. Accordingly, p62 can act as an effective suppressor of inflamm-aging, reducing oxidative stress and proinflammatory signals. Such an operational schedule renders this protein an effective watchdog for degenerative diseases and cancer development in laboratory and pet animals. This review summarizes the current findings concerning p62 activities as a molecular hub for cell and tissues metabolism and in a variety of inflammatory diseases and other pathological conditions. It also specifically addresses the applications of exogenous p62 (DNA plasmid) as an anti-inflammatory and homeostatic regulator in the treatment of osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, age-related macular degeneration and cancer in animals, and the possible application of p62 plasmid in other inflammation-associated diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Giovanna Sabbieti
- School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy; (M.G.S.); (A.M.)
| | - Andrea Marchegiani
- School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy; (M.G.S.); (A.M.)
| | - Albert A. Sufianov
- Federal Center of Neurosurgery, 625032 Tyumen, Russia;
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Alexander Shneider
- CureLab Oncology Inc., Dedham, MA 02026, USA; (V.L.G.); (A.S.)
- Department of Molecular Biology, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel
- Institute of Biomedical Systems and Biotechnology, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Dimitrios Agas
- School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy; (M.G.S.); (A.M.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
den Hollander W, Boer CG, Hart DJ, Yau MS, Ramos YFM, Metrustry S, Broer L, Deelen J, Cupples LA, Rivadeneira F, Kloppenburg M, Peters M, Spector TD, Hofman A, Slagboom PE, Nelissen RGHH, Uitterlinden AG, Felson DT, Valdes AM, Meulenbelt I, van Meurs JJB. Genome-wide association and functional studies identify a role for matrix Gla protein in osteoarthritis of the hand. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76:2046-2053. [PMID: 28855172 PMCID: PMC5788019 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Revised: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and the leading cause of disability in the elderly. Of all the joints, genetic predisposition is strongest for OA of the hand; however, only few genetic risk loci for hand OA have been identified. Our aim was to identify novel genes associated with hand OA and examine the underlying mechanism. METHODS We performed a genome-wide association study of a quantitative measure of hand OA in 12 784 individuals (discovery: 8743, replication: 4011). Genome-wide significant signals were followed up by analysing gene and allele-specific expression in a RNA sequencing dataset (n=96) of human articular cartilage. RESULTS We found two significantly associated loci in the discovery set: at chr12 (p=3.5 × 10-10) near the matrix Gla protein (MGP) gene and at chr12 (p=6.1×10-9) near the CCDC91 gene. The DNA variant near the MGP gene was validated in three additional studies, which resulted in a highly significant association between the MGP variant and hand OA (rs4764133, Betameta=0.83, Pmeta=1.8*10-15). This variant is high linkage disequilibrium with a coding variant in MGP, a vitamin K-dependent inhibitor of cartilage calcification. Using RNA sequencing data from human primary cartilage tissue (n=96), we observed that the MGP RNA expression of the hand OA risk allele was significantly lowercompared with the MGP RNA expression of the reference allele (40.7%, p<5*10-16). CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that the association between the MGP variant and increased risk for hand OA is caused by a lower expression of MGP, which may increase the burden of hand OA by decreased inhibition of cartilage calcification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter den Hollander
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Section Molecular Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cindy G Boer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Genetic Laboratory, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Deborah J Hart
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Michelle S Yau
- Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yolande F M Ramos
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Section Molecular Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Metrustry
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Linda Broer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Genetic Laboratory, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joris Deelen
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Section Molecular Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Cologne, Germany
| | - L Adrienne Cupples
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Fernando Rivadeneira
- Department of Internal Medicine, Genetic Laboratory, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet Kloppenburg
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Peters
- Department of Internal Medicine, Genetic Laboratory, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim D Spector
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Albert Hofman
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - P Eline Slagboom
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Section Molecular Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rob G H H Nelissen
- Department of Orthopedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - André G Uitterlinden
- Department of Internal Medicine, Genetic Laboratory, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David T Felson
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ana M Valdes
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ingrid Meulenbelt
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Section Molecular Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce J B van Meurs
- Department of Internal Medicine, Genetic Laboratory, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kraus VB, Hargrove DE, Hunter DJ, Renner JB, Jordan JM. Establishment of reference intervals for osteoarthritis-related soluble biomarkers: the FNIH/OARSI OA Biomarkers Consortium. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 76:179-185. [PMID: 27343253 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2016] [Revised: 05/04/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish reference intervals for osteoarthritis (OA)-related biomarkers used in the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) OA Biomarkers Consortium Project. METHODS A total of 129 'multijoint controls' were selected from 2722 African-American and Caucasian men and women in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. The majority (79%) of those eligible (with biospecimens and baseline data) also had one or more follow-up evaluations 5-15 years later. Multijoint controls were selected to be free of radiographic hand, hip, knee and lumbar spine osteoarthritis (OA), to have no knee or hip symptoms, and minimal hand and spine symptoms at all available time points. Eighteen biomarkers were evaluated in serum (s) and/or urine (u) by ELISA. Reference intervals and partitioning by gender and race were performed with EP Evaluator software. RESULTS Controls were 64% women, 33% African-Americans, mean age 59 years and mean body mass index 29 kg/m2. Three biomarkers were associated with age: sHyaluronan (positively), sN-terminal propeptide of collagen IIA (positively) and sCol2-3/4 C-terminal cleavage product of types I and II collagen (negatively). Exploratory analyses suggested that separate reference intervals may be warranted on the basis of gender for uC-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type II collagen (uCTXII), sMatrix metalloproteinase-3, uNitrated type II collagen degradation fragment (uCol2-1 NO2) and sHyaluronan, and on the basis of race for uCTXII, sCartilage oligomeric matrix protein, sC-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen and uCol2-1 NO2. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this represents the best and most stringent control group ever assayed for OA-related biomarkers. These well-phenotyped controls, representing a similar age demographic to that of the OA Initiative-FNIH main study sample, provide a context for interpretation of OA subject biomarker data. The freely available data set also provides a reference for future human studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia B Kraus
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - David J Hunter
- Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital and Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jordan B Renner
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joanne M Jordan
- Department of Medicine, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nelson AE, Elstad E, DeVellis RF, Schwartz TA, Golightly YM, Renner JB, Conaghan PG, Kraus VB, Jordan JM. Composite measures of multi-joint symptoms, but not of radiographic osteoarthritis, are associated with functional outcomes: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 36:300-6. [PMID: 23639066 DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.790490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine associations between multiple joint symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis (rOA) and functional outcomes. METHOD Complete cross-sectional data for multi-joint symptoms and radiographs, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores, and gait speed were available for 1307 Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project participants (34% men, 32% African American, mean age 66 years). Factor analysis of symptom scores and radiographic grades for the lumbosacral spine, bilateral hands, knees, and hips provided composite scores. Regression models were used to determine associations between composite scores, HAQ, and gait speed, adjusting for age, body mass index, gender, and race. RESULTS Five rOA factors were identified: (1) IP/CMC factor (carpometacarpal [CMC] and all interphalangeal [IP] joints); (2) MCP factor (metacarpophalangeal joints 2-5); (3) Knee factor (tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints); (4) Spine factor (L1/2 to L5/S1); and (5) Symptom factor. After adjustment, only the Symptom composite was significantly associated with HAQ and gait speed; a 1-standard deviation increase in Symptom score was associated with 9 times higher odds of having poorer function on the HAQ (odds ratio 9.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.80, 12.77), and a clinically significant decline in gait speed (0.06 m/s, 95% CI -0.07, -0.05). CONCLUSIONS A novel Symptom composite score was associated with poorer functional outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Osteoarthritis (OA) commonly affects multiple joints and is the most common form of arthritis. Symptomatic assessments, which can be easily executed by rehabilitation practitioners, are more closely related to self-reported and performance-based functional status than are less accessible and more costly radiographs. Symptomatic assessments are likely to be more informative for understanding, treating, and potentially preventing functional limitations than radiographic assessments.
Collapse
|
6
|
Goode AP, Marshall SW, Renner JB, Carey TS, Kraus VB, Irwin DE, Stürmer T, Jordan JM. Lumbar spine radiographic features and demographic, clinical, and radiographic knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64:1536-44. [PMID: 22556059 PMCID: PMC3427717 DOI: 10.1002/acr.21720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of lumbar spine individual radiographic features (IRFs) of disc space narrowing (DSN), osteophytes (OST), and facet joint osteoarthritis (FOA); to describe the frequencies of demographic, clinical, and radiographic knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis (OA) across lumbar spine IRFs; and to determine factors associated with lumbar spine IRFs. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study of 840 participants enrolled in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project (2003-2004). Sample-based prevalence estimates were generated for each lumbar spine IRF. The associations between lumbar spine IRFs and demographic, clinical, and peripheral joint OA were determined with logistic regression models. RESULTS Sample-based prevalence estimates were similar for DSN (57.6%) and FOA (57.9%) but higher for OST (88.1%), with significant differences across race and sex. Hand and knee OA frequencies increased across IRFs, whereas the effect was absent for hip OA. African Americans had lower odds of FOA (adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj) ] 0.45 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.32-0.62]), while there was no racial association with DSN and OST. Low back symptoms were associated with DSN (OR(adj) 1.37 [95% CI 1.04-1.80]) but not OST or FOA. Knee OA was associated with OST (OR(adj) 1.62 [95% CI 1.16-2.27]) and FOA (OR(adj) 1.69 [95% CI 1.15-2.49]) but not DSN. Hand OA was associated with FOA (OR(adj) 1.67 [95% CI 1.20-2.28]) but not with DSN or OST. No associations were found with hip OA. CONCLUSION These findings underscore the importance of analyzing lumbar spine IRFs separately as the associations with demographic, clinical, and radiographic knee, hip, and hand OA differ widely.
Collapse
|