Relationship of patients' age to histopathological features of breast tumours in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and mutation-negative breast cancer families

Can contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy increase survival in BRCA-related breast cancer? Results from the Italian MUTina study

INTRODUCTION

In the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy, a unique Hub and Spoke model was adopted to recognize BRCA-related breast cancer (BC) patients. Characteristics and outcomes of tumors identified by this model will be presented.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study involved patients diagnosed with BRCA-related BC identified in the Emilia-Romagna region between January 2000 and December 2013. Seven provinces collected data on patient and tumor characteristics; clinical and gene testing information were also registered. Comparisons between BRCA1 and BRCA2 BC were performed. To balance different variants to identify significant predictors of survival, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis on Cox regression was conducted.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2013, 284 BRCA-related BC were registered (171 BRCA1, 110 BRCA2, and 3 BRCA1 and BRCA2). BRCA1 were diagnosed at an earlier stage compared to BRCA2 (50.1 % vs 30 %, respectively, in stage I, P = 0.0015). BRCA2 patients underwent more up-front surgery (85 % vs. 74.9 %, P = 0.049) and less chemotherapy (69.1 % vs 88.9 %, P = 0.004) than BRCA1 patients. At 11.8 years median follow-up, BRCA1 patients developed more second contralateral BC (P = 0.09), while BRCA2 had more visceral relapses (P = 0.013). No differences in overall survival (OS) between BRCA1 and BRCA2 patients (P = 0.07) were found. An advantage in OS was independently seen for patients who underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (P = 0.0001) and oophorectomy (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, adopting a homogeneous regional framework provides important information about prevention and treatment strategies of BRCA-related BC and suggests using maximal surgery to improve OS.

PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF TOPOISOMERASE 2-ALPHA AND B-MYB IN EARLY BREAST CANCER TREATED WITH ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in females. Despite its well-established prognostic factors, our prognostic ability at an individual patient level remains limited. In this study, the immunohistochemical expression of B-Myb and DNA topoisomerase 2-alpha (Topo2a) was analyzed in primary tumors to identify patients with a higher risk of disease recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy for early invasive breast cancer. We analyzed a cohort of 215 early invasive breast cancer patients having undergone surgery from 2002 to 2003 at the Zagreb University Hospital Centre, including 153 patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. All of them were followed-up prospectively for at least ten years according to routine institutional practice. Statistically significant correlations were found between B-Myb and Topo2a expression levels and particular well-established prognostic factors. B-Myb expression was lower in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors (p=0.0773), whereas larger tumors and those with positive lymphovascular invasion displayed a statistically significantly higher B-Myb expression (p=0.0409 and p=0.0196). Higher tumor grade indicated higher Topo2a values (p=0.0102 and p=0.0069). The subgroup with the expression of both proteins above the median value had an almost statistically significantly (p=0.0613) inferior prognosis compared to the rest of the cohort. Study results showed the B-Myb and Topo2a expression to have a prognostic value in breast cancer patients after adjuvant chemotherapy, which should be additionally explored in future studies in a larger patient cohort.

Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer and recommended approaches to genetic testing/counseling and management strategies in individuals with these pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. This manuscript focuses on cancer risk and risk management for BRCA-related breast/ovarian cancer syndrome and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Carriers of a BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant have an excessive risk for both breast and ovarian cancer that warrants consideration of more intensive screening and preventive strategies. There is also evidence that risks of prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer are elevated in these carriers. Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a highly penetrant cancer syndrome associated with a high lifetime risk for cancer, including soft tissue sarcomas, osteosarcomas, premenopausal breast cancer, colon cancer, gastric cancer, adrenocortical carcinoma, and brain tumors.

Association of germline variation with the survival of women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and breast cancer

Germline genetic variation has been suggested to influence the survival of breast cancer patients independently of tumor pathology. We have studied survival associations of genetic variants in two etiologically unique groups of breast cancer patients, the carriers of germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. We found that rs57025206 was significantly associated with the overall survival, predicting higher mortality of BRCA1 carrier patients with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer, with a hazard ratio 4.37 (95% confidence interval 3.03-6.30, P = 3.1 × 10-9). Multivariable analysis adjusted for tumor characteristics suggested that rs57025206 was an independent survival marker. In addition, our exploratory analyses suggest that the associations between genetic variants and breast cancer patient survival may depend on tumor biological subgroup and clinical patient characteristics.

Investigating the effects of additional truncating variants in DNA-repair genes on breast cancer risk in BRCA1-positive women

Background

Inherited pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most common causes of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). The risk of developing breast cancer by age 80 in women carrying a BRCA1 pathogenic variant is 72%. The lifetime risk varies between families and even within affected individuals of the same family. The cause of this variability is largely unknown, but it is hypothesized that additional genetic factors contribute to differences in age at onset (AAO). Here we investigated whether truncating and rare missense variants in genes of different DNA-repair pathways contribute to this phenomenon.

Methods

We used extreme phenotype sampling to recruit 133 BRCA1-positive patients with either early breast cancer onset, below 35 (early AAO cohort) or cancer-free by age 60 (controls). Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) was used to screen for variants in 311 genes involved in different DNA-repair pathways.

Results

Patients with an early AAO (73 women) had developed breast cancer at a median age of 27 years (interquartile range (IQR); 25.00–27.00 years). A total of 3703 variants were detected in all patients and 43 of those (1.2%) were truncating variants. The truncating variants were found in 26 women of the early AAO group (35.6%; 95%-CI 24.7 - 47.7%) compared to 16 women of controls (26.7%; 95%-CI 16.1 to 39.7%). When adjusted for environmental factors and family history, the odds ratio indicated an increased breast cancer risk for those carrying an additional truncating DNA-repair variant to BRCA1 mutation (OR: 3.1; 95%-CI 0.92 to 11.5; p-value = 0.07), although it did not reach the conventionally acceptable significance level of 0.05.

Conclusions

To our knowledge this is the first time that the combined effect of truncating variants in DNA-repair genes on AAO in patients with hereditary breast cancer is investigated. Our results indicate that co-occurring truncating variants might be associated with an earlier onset of breast cancer in BRCA1-positive patients. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5946-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BRCA Mutation Carriers: Breast and Ovarian Cancer Screening Guidelines and Imaging Considerations

Patients who carry the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations have an underlying genetic predisposition for breast and ovarian cancers. These deleterious genetic mutations are the most common genes implicated in hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. This monograph summarizes the evidence behind current screening recommendations, reviews imaging protocols specific to this patient population, and illustrates some of the imaging nuances of breast and ovarian cancers in this clinical setting.

[Hereditary predisposition to breast cancer (1): genetics]

The main objective of oncogenetics is to characterize a subpopulation of patients at high risk of cancer development at an early age in order to provide specific recommendations for an optimized follow-up and care path. Oncogenetic counselling helps to assess individual risk from a family history. By a family approach of formal genetics, the key issue is to identify families with a strong aggregation of cancers, and, in particular, suggesting a specific syndrome of inherited predisposition to cancer. This approach can lead to the proposal of germline genetic testing in search of causal mutations. As up to know, the search for a constitutional mutation in the BRCA genes has led to the identification of a causal deleterious mutation in less than 10% of index-cases analyzed. It is therefore important to evaluate the impact of new genes in the current panorama of inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer.

Molecular Diagnostics in Clinical Oncology

There are multiple applications of molecular tests in clinical oncology. Mutation analysis is now routinely utilized for the diagnosis of hereditary cancer syndromes. Healthy carriers of cancer-predisposing mutations benefit from tight medical surveillance and various preventive interventions. Cancers caused by germ-line mutations often require significant modification of the treatment strategy. Personalized selection of cancer drugs based on the presence of actionable mutations has become an integral part of cancer therapy. Molecular tests underlie the administration of EGFR, BRAF, ALK, ROS1, PARP inhibitors as well as the use of some other cytotoxic and targeted drugs. Tumors almost always shed their fragments (single cells or their clusters, DNA, RNA, proteins) into various body fluids. So-called liquid biopsy, i.e., the analysis of circulating DNA or some other tumor-derived molecules, holds a great promise for non-invasive monitoring of cancer disease, analysis of drug-sensitizing mutations and early cancer detection. Some tumor- or tissue-specific mutations and expression markers can be efficiently utilized for the diagnosis of cancers of unknown primary origin (CUPs). Systematic cataloging of tumor molecular portraits is likely to uncover a multitude of novel medically relevant DNA- and RNA-based markers.

Clinicopathologic characterization of breast carcinomas in patients with non-BRCA germline mutations: results from a single institution's high-risk population

As multigene panel testing for hereditary cancer syndromes becomes commonplace, germline mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2 are increasingly identified in breast cancer patients. While histopathologic features of BRCA-mutated breast cancers have been well-characterized, less is known about non-BRCA-related hereditary cancers. We herein investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics of breast cancers in women with non-BRCA germline mutations. Out of 612 women who underwent germline testing, 16 (2.6%) women with 18 cancers had mutations in non-BRCA genes: ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, TP53, BMPR1A, BRIP1, MUTYH, and RAD50. An additional 2 cancers were identified in a woman with a diagnosis of Bloom syndrome (BLM mutation) who was not germline tested. Average age at diagnosis was 50 (range: 27-77), and 65% had no personal cancer history. The majority (79%) of tumors were grade 1 to 2; 35% were either lobular or ductal with lobular features. Stromal responses varied from absent to desmoplastic to sclerotic; 69% of cases had an in situ component. With the exception of a brisk lymphocytic response in BLM- and TP53-mutated cancers, lymphocytic infiltration was mild or absent. In summary, the majority of non-BRCA-related hereditary breast cancers represent the patient's sentinel malignancy. Lobular features were seen in a subset, and high-grade, immunogenic carcinomas were uncommon except in the setting of BLM and TP53 mutations. Overall, these findings demonstrate a range of involved genes in non-BRCA mutation carriers with breast cancer and histopathologic heterogeneity in the associated cancers, arguing against use of histomorphology to inform panel testing algorithms.

Association Between BRCA Status and P53 Status in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Research on BRCA mutation has meaningful clinical implications, such as identifying risk of second primary cancers and risk of hereditary cancers. This study seeks to summarize available data to investigate the association between BRCA status and P53 status by meta-analysis.

Material/Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases for relevant studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA software. We summarized odds ratios by fixed-effects or random-effects models.

Results

This study included a total of 4288 cases from 16 articles, which including 681 BRCA1 mutation carriers (BRCA1^Mut), 366 carriers of BRCA2 mutation (BRCA2^Mut), and 3241 carriers of normal versions of these genes. BRCA1^Mut was significantly associated with P53 over-expression compared with BRCA2^Mut (OR 1.851, 95% CI=1.393–2.458) or non-carriers (OR=2.503, 95% CI=1.493–4.198). No difference was found between p53 protein expression in BRCA2 ^Mut carriers and non-carriers (OR=0.881, 95% CI=0.670–1.158).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis suggests that BRCA1^Mut breast cancer patients are more likely to have P53 overexpression compared with BRCA2^Mut and non-carriers. This information provides valuable information for clinicians who perform related studies in the future.

Prognostic value of ki-67 in breast carcinoma: tissue microarray method versus whole section analysis- potentials and pitfalls

In our study we have compared the prognostic value of two distinct methods of immunohistochemical Ki-67 determination, tissue microarray (TMA) and classical whole section analysis. "Cut-off" values were used according to the 2009 St. Gallen Consensus. Tissue specimens were obtained from a consecutive retrospective series of 215 female patients with primary invasive tumours. Two hundred and thirteen patients were included in the study. Data on Ki-67 was collected by both tissue microarray (TMA) and whole section analysis. Follow up data on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were collected. Median follow-up was 95 months (range from 7.8 through 107 months). Mutual correlation of two Ki-67 determination methods was non-significant (Person's r = 0.13417; p = 0.0528). There was statistically significant association of whole section Ki-67 expression with histological and nuclear grade, progesterone receptor and HER2/neu status. The expression of Ki-67 protein in TMAs correlated only with histological and nuclear grade, but not with other traditional clinicopathological factors. Statistically significant differences in DFS (p = 0.0156) and OS (p = 0.0028) were confirmed between subgroups with low and high whole section Ki-67 expression. When subgroups with high and intermediate expression were compared, significant difference was found in DFS (p = 0.0272), but not in OS (p = 0.0624). On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference either in DFS, or in OS, according to the expression of Ki-67 in TMAs (p = 0.6529; p = 0.7883; p = 0.7966 for DFS, and p = 0.8917; p = 0.6448; p = 0.4323 for OS, respectively). In our study, classical whole section was superior to TMA analysis in terms of prognosis and clinicopathological correlation. Our results indicate that the method used may have impact on prognostic significance of Ki-67. Further studies are needed, covering a greater number of patients and including a precisely defined stage and treatment patient cohorts, in order to solve controversies in Ki-67 assessment methodology.

Novel tools for prostate cancer prognosis, diagnosis, and follow-up

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the main diagnostic tool when it comes to prostate cancer but it possesses serious limitations. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more sensitive and specific biomarkers for prostate cancer prognosis and patient follow-up. Recent advances led to the discovery of many novel diagnostic/prognostic techniques and provided us with many worthwhile candidates. This paper briefly reviews the most promising biomarkers with respect to their implementation in screening, early detection, diagnostic confirmation, prognosis, and prediction of therapeutic response or monitoring disease and recurrence; and their use as possible therapeutic targets. This review also examines the possible future directions in the field of prostate cancer marker research.

Lower mitotic activity in BRCA1/2-associated primary breast cancers occurring after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is associated with 50% reduction of BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer (BC) risk, possibly through decreased growth activity. In this pilot study, tumor characteristics and growth rates of BRCA1/2-associated primary BCs (PBCs) detected after RRSO were compared with those of PBCs originating without RRSO. From a cohort of 271 women with BRCA1/2-associated screen detected BC, we selected 20 patients with PBC detected ≥12 months after RRSO (RRSO group). Controls were 36 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with PBC detected without RRSO (non-RRSO group) matched for age at diagnosis (± 2.5 y) and for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Pathology samples were revised for histological subtype, tumor differentiation grade, mitotic activity index (MAI), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status. Tumor growth rates, expressed as tumor volume doubling times (DT), were calculated from revised magnetic resonance and mammographic images. Median age at PBC diagnosis was 52 y (range 35-67). PBCs after RRSO had lower MAIs (12 vs. 22 mitotic counts/2 mm, P = 0.02), were smaller (11 vs. 17 mm, P = 0.01), and tend to be PR-positive more often than PBCs without RRSO (38% vs. 13%, P = 0.07). Differentiation grade, ER, and HER2 status were not different. Median DT was 124 d (range 89-193) in the RRSO group and 93 days (range 54-253) in the non-RRSO group (P = 0.47). BC occurring after RRSO in BRCA mutation carriers features a lower MAI, suggesting a less aggressive biological phenotype. When confirmed in larger series, this may have consequences for BC screening protocols after RRSO.

Tumour morphology predicts PALB2 germline mutation status

Background:

Population-based studies of breast cancer have estimated that at least some PALB2 mutations are associated with high breast cancer risk. For women carrying PALB2 mutations, knowing their carrier status could be useful in directing them towards effective cancer risk management and therapeutic strategies. We sought to determine whether morphological features of breast tumours can predict PALB2 germline mutation status.

Methods:

Systematic pathology review was conducted on breast tumours from 28 female carriers of PALB2 mutations (non-carriers of other known high-risk mutations, recruited through various resources with varying ascertainment) and on breast tumours from a population-based sample of 828 Australian women diagnosed before the age of 60 years (which included 40 BRCA1 and 18 BRCA2 mutation carriers). Tumour morphological features of the 28 PALB2 mutation carriers were compared with those of 770 women without high-risk mutations.

Results:

Tumours arising in PALB2 mutation carriers were associated with minimal sclerosis (odds ratio (OR)=19.7; 95% confidence interval (CI)=6.0–64.6; P=5 × 10⁻⁷). Minimal sclerosis was also a feature that distinguished PALB2 mutation carriers from BRCA1 (P=0.05) and BRCA2 (P=0.04) mutation carriers.

Conclusion:

This study identified minimal sclerosis to be a predictor of germline PALB2 mutation status. Morphological review can therefore facilitate the identification of women most likely to carry mutations in PALB2.

Prognostic value of proliferation markers expression in breast cancer

In this study, immunohistochemical expression of five proliferation markers: Ki-67, aurora-A kinase, survivin, B-Myb and cyclin B1, was analyzed. Consecutive 215 tumor samples from breast cancer patients operated from 2002 to 2003 were analyzed using the TMA ("tissue microarray") method. The median follow-up was 95 months (from 7.8 to 107 months). Statistically significant correlations between expression levels in five proliferation markers, and correlations between some of the proliferation markers and traditional prognostic factors were found. Statistically significant prognostic influence of aurora-A kinase, survivin and B-Myb expression levels on overall and disease-free survival was found, and cyclin B1 expression level on disease-free survival. A multivariate analysis confirmed survivin and B-Myb expression as independent prognostic factors of overall (p = 0.0195; p = 0.0004) and disease-free survival (p = 0.0107 and p = 0.0205) in breast cancer patients.

IGF-1 and BRCA1 signalling pathways in familial cancer

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system has a direct effect on cellular proliferation and survival, and interacts with genetic and environmental factors implicated in causing cancer. Experimental, clinical, and epidemiological evidence show that the IGF signalling pathways are important mediators in the biochemical and molecular chain of events that lead from a phenotypically normal cell to one harbouring neoplastic traits. BRCA1 and BRCA2 have an important role in the development of hereditary and sporadic breast and ovarian cancer. Recent evidence suggests that risk of cancer conferred by BRCA mutations can be modified by genetic and environmental factors, including ambient concentrations of IGF-1 and polymorphisms in IGF system components. This Review addresses interactions between the IGF and BRCA1 signalling pathways, and emphasises the convergence of IGF-1-mediated cell survival, proliferative pathways, and BRCA1-mediated tumour protective pathways. Understanding the complex interactions between these signalling pathways might improve our understanding of basic molecular oncology processes and help to identify new molecular targets, predictive biomarkers, and approaches for optimising cancer therapies.

Age of 40 years or younger is an independent risk factor for locoregional failure in early breast cancer: a single-institutional analysis in saudi arabia

Background. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of prognostic factors on the locoregional failure-free survival of early breast cancer patients. Methods. In this single-institutional study, 213 breast cancer patients were retrospectively analysed. Fifty-five of 213 patients were ≤40 years of age at diagnosis. The impact of patient- or treatment-related factors on the locoregional failure-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The simultaneous impact of factors on the locoregional failure-free survival was assessed using the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results. The median follow-up time of the censored patients was 22 months (mean 28 months, range 3-92 months). On univariate analysis, statistically significant factors for the locoregional failure-free survival were the age (≤40 versus >40 years), T stage (Tis, T0-2 versus T3-4), molecular tumor type (luminal A versus luminal B, Her2neu overexpression, or triple negative), and lymphovascular status (LV0 versus LV1). On multivariate analysis, age and T stage remained statistically significant. Conclusions. Being 40 years or younger has a statistically significant independent adverse impact on the locoregional failure-free survival of patients with early breast cancer.

Therapeutic potential of PARP inhibitors for metastatic breast cancer

Increasing understanding of the cellular aberrations inherent to cancer cells has allowed the development of therapies to target biological pathways, an important step towards individualization of breast cancer therapy. The clinical development of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, with their novel and selective mechanism of action, are an example of this strategy. PARP plays a key role in DNA repair mechanisms, particularly the base excision repair pathway. Initially developed as inhibitors able to enhance the cytotoxicity of radiation and certain DNA-damaging agents, they have more recently been shown to have single-agent activity in certain tumors. Inhibition of PARP in a DNA repair-defective tumor can lead to gross genomic instability and cell death by exploiting the paradigm of synthetic lethality. Several studies have evaluated the role of PARP inhibitors for treatment of breast cancer, particularly in the context of BRCA-mutated and triple-negative breast cancers. In addition, inhibition of PARPs repair functions for chemotherapy-induced DNA lesions has been shown to potentiate the effect of some chemotherapy regimens. This article discusses the current understanding of PARP inhibition as a treatment for metastatic breast cancer, evidence from clinical trials and addresses its future implications.

Pathology of breast and ovarian cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA)

BACKGROUND

Previously, small studies have found that BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast tumors differ in their pathology. Analysis of larger datasets of mutation carriers should allow further tumor characterization.

METHODS

We used data from 4,325 BRCA1 and 2,568 BRCA2 mutation carriers to analyze the pathology of invasive breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancers.

RESULTS

There was strong evidence that the proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast tumors decreased with age at diagnosis among BRCA1 (P-trend = 1.2 × 10(-5)), but increased with age at diagnosis among BRCA2, carriers (P-trend = 6.8 × 10(-6)). The proportion of triple-negative tumors decreased with age at diagnosis in BRCA1 carriers but increased with age at diagnosis of BRCA2 carriers. In both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, ER-negative tumors were of higher histologic grade than ER-positive tumors (grade 3 vs. grade 1; P = 1.2 × 10(-13) for BRCA1 and P = 0.001 for BRCA2). ER and progesterone receptor (PR) expression were independently associated with mutation carrier status [ER-positive odds ratio (OR) for BRCA2 = 9.4, 95% CI: 7.0-12.6 and PR-positive OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.3-2.3, under joint analysis]. Lobular tumors were more likely to be BRCA2-related (OR for BRCA2 = 3.3, 95% CI: 2.4-4.4; P = 4.4 × 10(-14)), and medullary tumors BRCA1-related (OR for BRCA2 = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.18-0.35; P = 2.3 × 10(-15)). ER-status of the first breast cancer was predictive of ER-status of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer (P = 0.0004 for BRCA1; P = 0.002 for BRCA2). There were no significant differences in ovarian cancer morphology between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (serous: 67%; mucinous: 1%; endometrioid: 12%; clear-cell: 2%). CONCLUSIONS/IMPACT: Pathologic characteristics of BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors may be useful for improving risk-prediction algorithms and informing clinical strategies for screening and prophylaxis.

Pathology of hereditary breast cancer

Background

Hereditary breast cancer runs in families where several members in different generations are affected. Most of these breast cancers are caused by mutations in the high penetrance genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 accounting for about 5% of all breast cancers. Other genes that include CHEK2, PTEN, TP53, ATM, STK11/LKB1, CDH1, NBS1, RAD50, BRIP1 and PALB2 have been described to be high or moderate penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes, all contributing to the hereditary breast cancer spectrum. However, in still a part of familial hereditary breast cancers no relationship to any of these breast cancer susceptibility genes can be found. Research on new susceptibility genes is therefore ongoing.

Design

In this review we will describe the function of the today known high or moderate penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes and the consequences of their mutated status. Furthermore, we will focus on the histology, the immunophenotype and genotype of breast cancers caused by mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and the other high or moderate penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes. Finally, an overview of the clinical implications of hereditary breast cancer patients will be provided.

Conclusion

This information leads to a better understanding of the morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics of different types of hereditary breast cancers. Further, these characteristics offer clues for diagnosis and new therapeutic approaches.

Glycodelin expression associates with differential tumour phenotype and outcome in sporadic and familial non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer patients

Glycodelin (encoded by PAEP gene) is a secreted lipocalin protein mainly expressed in reproductive tissues, but also in several tumour types. In the breast, glycodelin is expressed both in normal epithelial and cancerous tissue. To investigate the association of glycodelin with clinicopathological features of breast cancer and outcome of patients we evaluated the protein expression of glycodelin in a large series of breast tumours. Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue microarrays was used to study glycodelin expression on 399 sporadic and 436 familial non-BRCA1/2 tumours with strong family history. Gene expression analysis was used to define genes co-expressed with PAEP in sporadic and familial non-BRCA1/2 breast tumours. In the sporadic series, the glycodelin expression associated with low proliferation rate (P < 0.001), with a tendency towards well-differentiated tumours (grades 1 and 2, P = 0.012) and high cyclin D1 (P = 0.034) expression. However, in familial non-BRCA1/2 cases with strong family history glycodelin expression associated with a less favourable phenotype, i.e. positive lymph node status (P = 0.003) and HER2-positive tumours (P = 0.009). Moreover, the patients with glycodelin-positive tumours had an increased risk for distant metastases (P = 0.001) and in multivariate analysis glycodelin expression was an independent predictor of metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.22, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.22-4.03, P = 0.009) in familial non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer. Gene expression analysis further revealed different gene expression profiles correlating with the PAEP expression in the sporadic and familial non-BRCA1/2 breast cancers. Our findings suggest differential progression pathways in the sporadic and familial non-BRCA1/2 breast tumours expressing glycodelin.

Familial and sporadic breast cancers: differences in clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical features

In the present study, the authors investigated the clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical features in familial breast cancer (FBC) patients and compared them with findings in sporadic breast cancers (SBCs); hormone receptor status was stratified by age. A total of 849 patients treated for breast cancer were included in the study. The patients were stratified into 2 groups: FBC, 160 patients (19%), and SBC, 689 patients (81%). FBC tumors differed from SBC tumors by earlier age of diagnosis and low content of progesterone receptor (PR). These characteristics should be of value in evaluating the possibility of mutation and in targeting mutation screening in such families. PR gene polymorphism leads to an increased risk of breast cancer because it determines inadequate control of estrogen receptor (ER)-driven proliferative function. ER+/PR- tumors more frequently showed HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor) overexpression and represent a distinct subset in FBC patients. The authors suggest that late-onset FBCs need more intensive therapy and a more careful follow-up.

The breast cancer susceptibility mutation PALB2 1592delT is associated with an aggressive tumor phenotype

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of the breast cancer susceptibility mutation PALB2 1592delT on tumor phenotype and patient survival.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We defined the PALB2 mutation status in 947 familial and 1,274 sporadic breast cancer patients and 1,079 population controls, and compared tumor characteristics and survival in mutation carriers relative to other familial and sporadic cases and to 79 BRCA1 and 104 BRCA2 mutation carrier cases.

RESULTS

The PALB2 1592delT mutation was found in 19 familial [2.0%; odds ratio, 11.03; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.65-97.78; P < 0.0001] and eight sporadic patients (0.6%; odds ratio, 3.40; 95% CI, 0.68-32.95; P = 0.1207) compared with two (0.2%) control individuals. Tumors of the PALB2 mutation carriers presented triple negative (estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor negative/HER negative) phenotype more often (54.5%; P < 0.0001) than those of other familial (12.2%) or sporadic (9.4%) breast cancer patients. They were also more often of higher grade (P = 0.0027 and P = 0.0017, respectively) and had higher expression of Ki67 (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.0490, respectively). Carrying a PALB2 mutation was also associated with reduced survival, especially in familial cases (hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.01-5.24; P = 0.0466) and among familial patients with HER2-negative tumors (hazard ratio, 4.57; 95% CI, 1.96-10.64; P = 0.0004). Carrying a BRCA2 mutation was also found to be an independent predictor of poor survival at 10-year follow-up (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The PALB2 1592delT mutation has a strong effect on familial breast cancer risk. The tumors rising in patients carrying this mutation manifest a phenotype associated with aggressive disease. Our results also suggest a significant impact of carrying a BRCA2 mutation on long-term breast cancer survival.

Possible Relationship between Basal-Like Breast Carcinoma and Age

SUMMARY: INTRODUCTION: Estrogen receptor expression is lower in breast carcinoma of women ≤45 years compared to women ≥65 years of age, which may imply a higher frequency of basal-like breast carcinomas in younger women. This study evaluated whether there is any difference in the frequency of basal-like phenotype and estrogen receptor (ER)-/HER2- invasive breast carcinomas between women of these 2 different age groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 151 women aged ≤45 years or ≥65 years with invasive breast carcinomas were evaluated using tissue microarray, and classified into the following phenotypes: luminal A (ER+/HER2-), luminal B (ER+/HER2+), HER2 overexpression (ER-/HER2+), and basal-like (ER-/HER2- and expressing at least 1 of the basal markers p63, CK5 and/or P-cadherin). RESULTS: ER-/HER2- carcinomas were twice as frequent in women aged ≤45 years (p = 0.0247). However, when the basal-like phenotype was compared with all the other phenotypes grouped together, no statistically significant difference was found (p = 0.0854). CONCLUSIONS: ER-/HER2- carcinomas were more frequent in younger women compared to all the other phenotypes grouped together. An international consensus will be necessary to establish which markers should be used to define basal-like phenotype.

How age affects the biology of breast cancer

Breast cancer incidence increases with age, but there are important age-related differences with respect to the frequency of different tumour subtypes with respect to hormone receptor status and pathological grade. In general, younger patients show a higher frequency of oestrogen receptor-negative, higher-grade tumours, whereas in older patients there is a higher frequency of oestrogen receptor-positive, low-grade tumours. This accounts for the fact that, in general, elderly patients are thought to have a less aggressive form of the disease. However, this does not mean that all elderly patients with breast cancer necessarily have a good prognosis. An increased understanding of the mechanisms of tissue ageing and how these affect the molecular biological phenotype of breast cancers in cohorts of different ages will aid the oncologist's confidence in tailoring treatment more appropriately to the likely prognosis, and the development of novel, hopefully less toxic, treatments for specific subtypes of breast cancer in the elderly population.

Aberrations of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 DNA damage sensor complex in human breast cancer: MRE11 as a candidate familial cancer-predisposing gene

The MRE11, RAD50, and NBS1 genes encode proteins of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex critical for proper maintenance of genomic integrity and tumour suppression; however, the extent and impact of their cancer-predisposing defects, and potential clinical value remain to be determined. Here, we report that among a large series of approximately 1000 breast carcinomas, around 3%, 7% and 10% tumours showed aberrantly reduced protein expression for RAD50, MRE11 and NBS1, respectively. Such defects were more frequent among the ER/PR/ERBB2 triple-negative and higher-grade tumours, among familial (especially BRCA1/BRCA2-associated) rather than sporadic cases, and the NBS1 defects correlated with shorter patients' survival. The BRCA1-associated and ER/PR/ERBB2 triple-negative tumours also showed high incidence of constitutively active DNA damage signalling (gammaH2AX) and p53 aberrations. Sequencing the RAD50, MRE11 and NBS1 genes of 8 patients from non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families whose tumours showed concomitant reduction/loss of all three MRN-complex proteins revealed two germline mutations in MRE11: a missense mutation R202G and a truncating mutation R633STOP (R633X). Gene transfer and protein analysis of cell culture models with mutant MRE11 implicated various destabilization patterns among the MRN complex proteins including NBS1, the abundance of which was restored by re-expression of wild-type MRE11. We propose that germline mutations qualify MRE11 as a novel candidate breast cancer susceptibility gene in a subset of non-BRCA1/2 families. Our data have implications for the concept of the DNA damage response as an intrinsic anti-cancer barrier, various components of which become inactivated during cancer progression and also represent the bulk of breast cancer susceptibility genes discovered to date.

Aberrations of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 DNA damage sensor complex in human breast cancer: MRE11 as a candidate familial cancer-predisposing gene

The MRE11, RAD50, and NBS1 genes encode proteins of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex critical for proper maintenance of genomic integrity and tumour suppression; however, the extent and impact of their cancer-predisposing defects, and potential clinical value remain to be determined. Here, we report that among a large series of approximately 1000 breast carcinomas, around 3%, 7% and 10% tumours showed aberrantly reduced protein expression for RAD50, MRE11 and NBS1, respectively. Such defects were more frequent among the ER/PR/ERBB2 triple-negative and higher-grade tumours, among familial (especially BRCA1/BRCA2-associated) rather than sporadic cases, and the NBS1 defects correlated with shorter patients' survival. The BRCA1-associated and ER/PR/ERBB2 triple-negative tumours also showed high incidence of constitutively active DNA damage signalling (gammaH2AX) and p53 aberrations. Sequencing the RAD50, MRE11 and NBS1 genes of 8 patients from non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families whose tumours showed concomitant reduction/loss of all three MRN-complex proteins revealed two germline mutations in MRE11: a missense mutation R202G and a truncating mutation R633STOP (R633X). Gene transfer and protein analysis of cell culture models with mutant MRE11 implicated various destabilization patterns among the MRN complex proteins including NBS1, the abundance of which was restored by re-expression of wild-type MRE11. We propose that germline mutations qualify MRE11 as a novel candidate breast cancer susceptibility gene in a subset of non-BRCA1/2 families. Our data have implications for the concept of the DNA damage response as an intrinsic anti-cancer barrier, various components of which become inactivated during cancer progression and also represent the bulk of breast cancer susceptibility genes discovered to date.

Cyclin D1 expression analysis in familial breast cancers may discriminate BRCAX from BRCA2-linked cases

Most familial breast cancers arise in patients who tested negative for germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (also referred to as BRCAX cases). Several studies aimed to define histopathological and molecular profiles characteristic of BRCA1, BRCA2 and BRCAX tumors have been performed. Major pathological and immunohistochemical differences have been reported in BRCA1 cancers compared to the other two groups, whereas less difference has been observed between BRCA2 and BRCAX cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of selected tumor markers to discriminate BRCAX breast cancers from cancers arising in carriers of mutations in BRCA genes, and their usefulness in selecting familial cases in whom testing for such mutations is more likely to result uninformative. We carried out a morphological and immunohistochemical analysis on 22 BRCA1, 16 BRCA2 and 33 BRCAX familial breast cancers. Age at first diagnosis, histological type and grade, and immunostaining for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), p53, HER2/Neu, E-cadherin and cyclin D1 were investigated. The occurrence of somatic mutations of the TP53 gene was also verified. BRCA1 tumors resulted clearly distinguishable from BRCAX cases, occurring at a younger age, being more frequently of higher grade, negative for ER, PR and cyclin D1 expression and positive for p53 alterations. The predictive value of age at diagnosis, histological grade and PR expression was confirmed in a multivariable analysis. When comparing BRCA2 with BRCAX tumors, the only parameter that differed was cyclin D1, which was significantly overexpressed in BRCA2 cases both in the univariable and the multivariable analyses. If confirmed by further studies, our observations indicate that the investigation of cyclin D1 expression in familial breast cancer cases could be used, in conjunction with the analysis of other tumor markers preferentially associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 tumors, to prioritize hereditary cases for mutation testing in BRCA genes.

Histopathological features of 'BRCAX' familial breast cancers in the kConFab resource

AIMS

In recent years histopathology has made an important contribution to the study of familial breast cancer, largely on the basis of the distinctive cancer phenotype commonly identified in BRCA1-mutation carriers. The aim of this study was to identify this phenotype amongst index cases from families in the kConFab familial breast cancer resource with no known pathogenic mutation ('BRCAX' families).

METHODS

The histopathology of breast cancer from 180 individuals was reviewed: 132 members of individual BRCAX families, 26 BRCA1 and 15 BRCA2 mutation carriers and seven mutation negative individuals from families with a known pathogenic mutation.

RESULTS

BRCAX breast cancers were a heterogeneous group with 25.8% grade 1, 37.9% grade 2 and 36.4% grade 3. Overall, 45/180 (25%) cases were designated 'BRCA1-phenotype' including 22/132 (16.7%) BRCAX cases, 18/26 (69.2%) BRCA1 and 5/15 (33.3%) BRCA2 mutation carriers. For BRCAX cases, a BRCA1 phenotype designation was negatively correlated with age.

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristic breast cancer pathology is not diagnostic of a germline BRCA1 mutation, but it does indicate a pathogenic mechanism that occurs with increased frequency in BRCA1 mutation carriers. In BRCAX families, BRCA1 tumour phenotype may signal the presence of an unidentified BRCA1 mutation. However, this finding must be interpreted with regard to limits of the association between histopathology and genotype, and the importance of clinical context.

Hereditary breast cancer: from molecular pathology to tailored therapies

Hereditary breast cancer accounts for up to 5-10% of all breast carcinomas. Recent studies have demonstrated that mutations in two high-penetrance genes, namely BRCA1 and BRCA2, are responsible for about 16% of the familial risk of breast cancer. Even though subsequent studies have failed to find another high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility gene, several genes that confer a moderate to low risk of breast cancer development have been identified; moreover, hereditary breast cancer can be part of multiple cancer syndromes. In this review we will focus on the hereditary breast carcinomas caused by mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, Fanconi anaemia (FANC) genes, CHK2 and ATM tumour suppressor genes. We describe the hallmark histological features of these carcinomas compared with non-hereditary breast cancers and show how an accurate histopathological diagnosis may help improve the identification of patients to be screened for mutations. Finally, novel therapeutic approaches to treat patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ line mutations, including cross-linking agents and PARP inhibitors, are discussed.

Familial breast cancers without mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have low cyclin E and high cyclin D1 in contrast to cancers in BRCA mutation carriers

PURPOSE

We analyzed the expression of critical cell cycle regulators cyclin E and cyclin D1 in familial breast cancer, focusing on BRCA mutation-negative tumors. Cyclin E expression in tumors of BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers is higher, and cyclin D1 expression lower, than in sporadic tumors. In familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors, cyclin E and cyclin D1 expression has not been studied.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Cyclin E and cyclin D1 immunohistochemical expression was studied in tissue microarrays consisting of 53 BRCA1, 58 BRCA2, 798 familial non-BRCA1/2, and 439 sporadic breast tumors.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, BRCA1 tumors had significantly more frequently high cyclin E (88%) and low cyclin D1 (84%) expression than sporadic (54% and 49%, respectively) or familial non-BRCA1/2 (38% and 45%, respectively) tumors. BRCA2 tumors had significantly more frequently low cyclin D1 expression (68%) than sporadic or familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors and significantly more frequently high cyclin E expression than familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors. In a logistic regression model, cyclin expression, early age of onset, and estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status were the independent factors most clearly distinguishing tumors of BRCA1 mutation carriers from other familial breast cancers. High cyclin E and low cyclin D1 expression were also independent predictors of BRCA2 mutation when compared with familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors. Most interestingly, lower frequency of high cyclin E expression independently distinguished familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors also from sporadic ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclin E and cyclin D1 expression distinguishes non-BRCA1/2 tumors from both sporadic and BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated tumors and may reflect different predisposition and pathogenesis in these groups.

Models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Han Chinese familial breast and/or ovarian cancer patients

PURPOSE

Our aim was to find an appropriate method to estimate the likelihood that a family history of cancer was a result of a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. We also compared the performance of the established method with three different methods (Couch, Sh-E and BRCApro) to identify an alternative strategy for genetic council targeted to the specified population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The family history as well as individual information of two hundred unrelated probands who had completed BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation screening was analyzed to assess the likelihood of a pathogenic mutation. A model was developed by empirical method. The performance of this model was validated in a separate patient cohort compared with BRCApro.

RESULTS

Several factors were associated with mutations in univariate analysis and a logistic model was devised to estimate the probability for a proband of harboring a mutation in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2. Using a greater than 10% probability threshold, the highest accuracy was achieved by the established model when compared to other three models, presenting the highest sensitivity, PPV, NPV and area under ROC curve. The empirical model showed a better ROC curve compared to BRCApro in the verification cohort.

CONCLUSION

A probability model targeted to Han Chinese population should be a useful tool in the genetic counseling for the specified ethnic. Its ability to predict BRCA2 mutation carriers needs to be improved.

Basal cytokeratins in breast tumours among BRCA1, BRCA2 and mutation-negative breast cancer families

INTRODUCTION

Finding new immunohistochemical markers that are specific to hereditary breast cancer could help us to select candidates for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing and to understand the biological pathways of tumour development.

METHODS

Using breast cancer tumour microarrays, immunohistochemical expression of cytokeratin (CK)-5/6, CK-14 and CK-17 was evaluated in breast tumours from BRCA1 families (n = 46), BRCA2 families (n = 40), non-BRCA1/BRCA2 families (n = 358) and familial breast cancer patients with one first-degree relative affected by breast or ovarian cancer (n = 270), as well as from patients with sporadic breast cancer (n = 364). Staining for CK-5/6, CK-14 and CK-17 was compared between these groups and correlated with other clinical and histological factors.

RESULTS

CK-5/6, CK-14 and CK-17 were detected mostly among oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative and high-grade tumours. We found the highest percentages of samples positive for these CKs among ER-negative/HER2-negative tumours. In univariate analysis, CK-14 was significantly associated with tumours from BRCA1 (39%; P < 0.0005), BRCA2 (27%; P = 0.011), and non-BRCA1/BRCA2 (21%; P < 0.005) families, as compared with sporadic tumours (10%). However, in multivariate analysis, CKs were not found to be independently associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation status, and the most effective predictors of BRCA1 mutations were age at onset, HER2 status, and either ER or PR status.

CONCLUSION

Although our study confirms that basal CKs can help to identify BRCA1 mutation carriers, this effect was weaker than previously suggested and CKs did not independently predict BRCA1 mutation either from sporadic or familial breast cancer cases. The most effective, independent predictors of BRCA1 mutations were age at onset, HER2 status, and either ER or PR status, as compared with sporadic or non-BRCA1/BRCA2 cancers.

Being 40 or younger is an independent risk factor for relapse in operable breast cancer patients: the Saudi Arabia experience

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer in young Saudi women is a crucial problem. According to the 2002 annual report of Saudi National Cancer Registry, breast cancers that developed before the age of 40 comprise 26.4% of all female breast cancers comparing to 6.5% in the USA. Breast cancer in young patients is often associated with a poorer prognosis, but there has been a scarcity of published data in the Middle East population.

METHODS

Total of 867 breast cancer patients seen at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (KFSH&RC) between 1986 and 2002 were reviewed. Patients were divided in two age groups: < or = 40 years and above 40 years. The clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between younger and older age groups.

RESULTS

Median age at presentation was 45 years. A total of 288 (33.2%) patients were aged < or = 40 years. Hormone receptors were positive in 69% of patients 40 and 78.2% of patients above 40 (p = 0.009). There was a significantly higher incidence of grade III tumor in younger patients compared to older patients (p = 0.0006). Stage, tumor size, lymphatic/vascular invasion, number of nodes and axillary lymph node status, did not differ significantly between the two age groups. Younger patients had a greater probability of recurrence at all time periods (p = 0.035). Young age had a negative impact on survival of patients with positive axillary lymph nodes (p = 0.030) but not on survival of patients with negative lymph nodes (p = 0.695). Stage, tumor size, nodal status and hormonal receptors had negative impact on survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 87.9% of younger and 65.6% of older patients (p < 0.0001). In terms of hormone therapy, the proportion of tamoxifen treated patients was significantly lower in young age group (p < 0.0001). No significant difference in radiation therapy between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Young age (< or = 40) is an independent risk factor for relapse in operable Saudi breast cancer patients. The fundamental biology of young age breast cancer patients needs to be elucidated.

The DNA damage signalling kinase ATM is aberrantly reduced or lost in BRCA1/BRCA2-deficient and ER/PR/ERBB2-triple-negative breast cancer

The ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) kinase is a key transducer of DNA damage signals within the genome maintenance machinery and a tumour suppressor whose germline mutations predispose to familial breast cancer. ATM signalling is constitutively activated in early stages of diverse types of human malignancies and cell culture models in response to oncogene-induced DNA damage providing a barrier against tumour progression. As BRCA1 and BRCA2 are also components of the genome maintenance network and their mutations predispose to breast cancer, we have examined the ATM expression in human breast carcinomas of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, sporadic cases and familial non-BRCA1/2 patients. Our results show that ATM protein expression is aberrantly reduced more frequently among BRCA1 (33%; P=0.0003) and BRCA2 (30%; P=0.0009) tumours than in non-BRCA1/2 tumours (10.7%). Furthermore, the non-BRCA1/2 tumours with reduced ATM expression were more often estrogen receptor (ER) negative (P=0.0002), progesterone receptor (PR) negative (P=0.004) and were of higher grade (P=0.0004). In our series of 1013 non-BRCA1/2 cases, ATM was more commonly deficient (20%; P=0.0006) and p53 was overabundant (47%; P<0.0000000001) among the difficult-to-treat ER/PR/ERBB2-triple-negative subset of tumours compared with cases that expressed at least one of these receptors (10 and 16% of aberrant ATM and p53, respectively). We propose a model of 'conditional haploinsufficiency' for BRCA1/2 under conditions of enhanced DNA damage in precancerous lesions resulting in more robust activation and hence increased selection for inactivation or loss of ATM in tumours of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, with implications for genomic instability and curability of diverse subsets of human breast cancer.

Elevated insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) levels in primary breast tumors associated with BRCA1 mutations

The insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) play a pivotal role in breast cancer. Inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer is associated with germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. To evaluate the impact of BRCA1 mutations on IGF-IR gene expression, we performed an immunohistochemical analysis of IGF-IR in primary breast tumors from BRCA1 mutation carriers and non-carriers. Results obtained revealed a significant elevation in IGF-IR levels in tumors from BRCA1 mutation carriers compared with non-carriers. To assess the potential inhibitory role of BRCA1 on IGF-IR levels, we infected the BRCA1-deficient HCC1937 cell line with a BRCA1-encoding adenoviral vector. Results of Western blots showed that BRCA1 induced a large reduction in endogenous IGF-IR levels. Furthermore, results of chromatin immunoprecipitation assays indicated that the mechanism of action of BRCA1 involves interaction with Sp1, a potent transactivator of the IGF-IR gene. In conclusion, our data suggests that the IGF-IR gene is a physiologically relevant downstream target for BRCA1 action.

Tumour characteristics, survival and prognostic factors of hereditary breast cancer from BRCA2-, BRCA1- and non-BRCA1/2 families as compared to sporadic breast cancer cases

AIM OF THE STUDY

Results on tumour characteristics and survival of hereditary breast cancer (BC), especially on BRCA2-associated BC, are inconclusive. The prognostic impact of the classical tumour and treatment factors in hereditary BC is insufficiently known.

METHODS

We selected 103 BRCA2-, 223 BRCA1- and 311 non-BRCA1/2 BC patients (diagnosis 1980-2004) from the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic. To correct for longevity bias, analyses were also performed while excluding index patients undergoing DNA testing 2 years after BC diagnosis. As a comparison group, 759 sporadic BC patients of comparable age at and year of diagnosis were selected. We compared tumour characteristics, the occurrence of ipsilateral recurrence (LRR) and contralateral BC (CBC) as well as distant disease-free (DDFS), BC-specific (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) between these groups. By multivariate modelling, the prognostic impact of tumour and treatment factors was investigated separately in hereditary BC.

RESULTS

We confirmed the presence of the particular BRCA1-phenotype. In contrast, tumour characteristics of BRCA2-associated BC were similar to those of non-BRCA1/2 and sporadic BC, with the exception of a high risk of CBC (3.1% per year) and oestrogen-receptor (ER)-positivity (83%). No significant differences between BRCA2-associated BC and other BC subgroups were found with respect to LRR, DDFS, BCSS and OS. Independent prognostic factors for BC-specific survival in hereditary BC (combining the three subgroups) were tumour stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, histologic grade, ER status and a prophylactic (salpingo-)oophorectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from the frequent occurrence of contralateral BC and a positive ER-status, BRCA2-associated BC did not markedly differ from other hereditary or sporadic BC. Our observation that tumour size and nodal status are prognostic factors also in hereditary BC implies that the strategy to use these factors as a proxy for ultimate mortality appears to be valid also in this specific group of patients.

Characterization of familial non-BRCA1/2 breast tumors by loss of heterozygosity and immunophenotyping

PURPOSE

Since the identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2, there has been no major breast cancer susceptibility gene discovered by linkage analysis in breast cancer families. This has been attributed to the heterogeneous genetic basis for the families under study. Recent studies have indicated that breast tumors arising in women carrying a BRCA1 mutation have distinct histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features. To a lesser extent, this is also true for breast tumors from BRCA2 carriers. This indicates that it might be possible to decrease the genetic heterogeneity among families in which BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been excluded with high certainty (BRCAx families) if distinct subgroups of BRCAx-related breast tumors could be identified.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis with at least one marker per chromosomal arm (65 markers) was used to characterize 100 breast tumors derived from 92 patients from 42 selected BRCAx families. In addition, the immunophenotype of 10 markers was compared with that of 31 BRCA1- and 21 BRCA2-related breast tumors.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The BRCAx-related tumors were characterized by more frequent LOH at 22q relative to sporadic breast cancer (P < 0.02), and differed significantly from BRCA1- and BRCA2-related tumors in their positivity for Bcl2. However, cluster analyses of the combined data (LOH and immunohistochemistry) did not result in subgroups that would allow meaningful subclassification of the families. On chromosomes 2, 3, 6, 12, 13, 21, and 22, we found markers at which LOH occurred significantly more frequent among the tumors from patients belonging to a single family than expected on the basis of overall LOH frequencies. Nonetheless, linkage analysis with markers for the corresponding regions on chromosomes 12, 21, and 22 did not reveal significant logarithm of the odds.

Basal-like breast cancer and the BRCA1 phenotype

Breast cancers arising in germline carriers of BRCA1 mutations have a characteristic phenotype that has been shown in many studies to differentiate BRCA1 tumours from sporadic tumours. Recently, it has become clear that the characteristic phenotype of BRCA1 tumours is due to expression of the basal-like phenotype. We review these phenotypes, the evidence for BRCA1 pathway dysfunction in sporadic basal-like cancers, and discuss the clinical significance of the basal-like phenotype for cancer genetics and treatment.

Pathology and gene expression of hereditary breast tumors associated with BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 gene mutations

Tumors arising in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers appear to have specific pathological and gene expression profiles, which show a high level of concordance. BRCA1 tumors are high-grade, negative for hormone receptors, have a high proliferation rate, and are positive for some cell cycle promoter genes. BRCA2 tumors present a phenotype opposite to BRCA1 tumors but very similar to sporadic tumors, except that BRCA2 overexpress some DNA repair markers such as CHEK2, show high cytoplasmic expression of RAD51, and are negative for HER-2 amplification and expression. Some of these characteristics have also been found in cDNA expression studies, although more analysis are necessary in order to obtain new markers that can be associated with a germ line mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. In this way, some studies in normal tissues of BRCA1/2 carriers suggest that differences exist in the level of expression of some genes when compared with noncarriers. Finally, IHC studies in tumors carrying a mutation in CHEK2 are rare and show contradictory results, probably due to the low number of these cases. However, they represent an example showing how different mutations of the same gene may be associated with specific histological subtypes of cancer.

Distinction between hereditary and sporadic breast cancer on the basis of clinicopathological data

BACKGROUND

About 5% of all breast cancer cases are attributable to germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. BRCA mutations in suspected carriers, however, may be missed, which hampers genetic counselling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Different clinicopathological features were compared between 22 breast cancers from carriers of proved BRCA1 mutations and 604 cancers from sporadic controls. In addition, 5 BRCA2-related breast cancers and 66 breast cancers of untested patients at intermediate risk and 19 breast cancers of untested patients at high risk of hereditary disease on the basis of family history were evaluated.

RESULTS

A "probably sporadic" class (age >or=54 years and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) negative; 68% of cases) with a 0% chance of BRCA1-related breast cancer containing 79% of the sporadic cases was yielded by using a decision tree with age, Ki67 and EGFR. A 75% chance of BRCA1-related breast cancer was shown by the "probably BRCA1-related" class (age <54 years and Ki67 >or=25%; 8% of cases) with 82% of the BRCA1-related cases but only 1.4% of the sporadic cases. Most cases at intermediate or high risk of hereditary disease on the basis of family history could be classified with high probability as either probably BRCA1 related or probably sporadic.

CONCLUSION

Breast carcinomas can be classified with a high level of certainty as sporadic or related to BRCA1 germline mutations by using a decision tree with age, Ki67 and EGFR. This can be clinically useful in mutation analysis in families with a borderline risk of hereditary disease.

Histopathology of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancer

Hereditary breast carcinomas that are attributable to BRCA1/2 mutations have their own morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics. BRCA1-associated carcinomas are poorly differentiated infiltrating ductal carcinomas that frequently show morphological features of typical or atypical medullary carcinoma. BRCA2-associated breast carcinomas tend to be of higher grade than sporadic age-matched controls. BRCA1tumors have been found to be more frequently estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-negative, and p53-positive than are age-matched controls, whereas these differences are not usually found in BRCA2-associated tumors. In addition, BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast carcinomas show a low frequency of HER2 expression. Most BRCA1 breast carcinomas are characterized by the expression of basal (myoepithelial) markers, such as cytokeratin 5/6 and or P-cadherin. These features could be used to distinguish patients who are likely to carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation, thus indicating which gene should be screened for first in families with a high incidence of breast and ovarian cancer.

Gene Expression Profiling in Hereditary, BRCA1-linked Breast Cancer: Preliminary Report

Global analysis of gene expression by DNA microarrays is nowadays a widely used tool, especially relevant for cancer research. It helps the understanding of complex biology of cancer tissue, allows identification of novel molecular markers, reveals previously unknown molecular subtypes of cancer that differ by clinical features like drug susceptibility or general prognosis. Our aim was to compare gene expression profiles in breast cancer that develop against a background of inherited predisposing mutations versus sporadic breast cancer. In this preliminary study we analysed seven hereditary, BRCA1 mutation-linked breast cancer tissues and seven sporadic cases that were carefully matched by histopathology and ER status. Additionally, we analysed 6 samples of normal breast tissue. We found that while the difference in gene expression profiles between tumour tissue and normal breast can be easily recognized by unsupervised algorithms, the difference between those two types of tumours is more discrete. However, by supervised methods of data analysis, we were able to select a set of genes that may differentiate between hereditary and sporadic tumours. The most significant difference concerns genes that code for proteins engaged in regulation of transcription, cellular metabolism, signalling, proliferation and cell death. Microarray results for chosen genes (TOB1, SEPHS2) were validated by real-time RT-PCR.