Strength and weakness of phase I to IV trials, with an emphasis on translational aspects

Adjunctive PD-1 inhibitor versus standard chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective:

To investigate whether Adjunctive PD-1 inhibitors have improved clinical outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone in platinum-pretreated and platinum-naive recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPCA).

Methods:

The study involved a literature search from PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on the use of PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with R/M NPCA. Bias was assessed using Cochrane collaboration’s risk of bias tool. Overall Survival (OS) was examined as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate, Disease Control Rate (DCR), Duration of Response, and Serious/Grade ⩾3 Adverse Events. Outcomes were measured with either Mean Difference, Risk ratio (RR), or Hazard ratios (HRs) at 95% confidence interval.

Results:

Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis and systematic review. OS for the monotherapy subgroup was a HR of 0.87 [0.67, 1.13] ( p = 0.30) while the combination subgroup had 0.64 [0.45, 0.90] ( p = 0.01). The monotherapy subgroup exhibited significantly worse outcomes in PFS (HR 1.31 [1.01, 1.68]) ( p = 0.04) and DCR (RR 1.52 [1.12, 2.05]) ( p = 0.007) but no significant difference in other outcomes. For combination therapy, a statistically significant benefit can be seen in all outcomes except DCR (RR 0.62 [0.38, 1.01]) ( p = 0.06) which was a non-significant benefit favoring PD-1 inhibitors.

Conclusion:

Combination PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy followed by maintenance PD-1 inhibitor therapy is superior to chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of R/M NPCA, implying a potential benefit with the use of PD-1 inhibitors + chemotherapy with maintenance PD-1 inhibitors as first-line in R/M NPCA compared to standard chemotherapy alone.

Use of functional imaging across clinical phases in CNS drug development

The use of novel brain biomarkers using nuclear magnetic resonance imaging holds potential of making central nervous system (CNS) drug development more efficient. By evaluating changes in brain function in the disease state or drug effects on brain function, the technology opens up the possibility of obtaining objective data on drug effects in the living awake brain. By providing objective data, imaging may improve the probability of success of identifying useful drugs to treat CNS diseases across all clinical phases (I-IV) of drug development. The evolution of functional imaging and the promise it holds to contribute to drug development will require the development of standards (including good imaging practice), but, if well integrated into drug development, functional imaging can define markers of CNS penetration, drug dosing and target engagement (even for drugs that are not amenable to positron emission tomography imaging) in phase I; differentiate objective measures of efficacy and side effects and responders vs non-responders in phase II, evaluate differences between placebo and drug in phase III trials and provide insights into disease modification in phase IV trials.