Clinical trials update of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Group

Effect of Lavage with Gentamicin vs. Clindamycin vs. Physiologic Saline on Drainage Discharge of the Axillary Surgical Bed after Lymph Node Dissection

BACKGROUND

To date, without placement of a drain, seroma formation cannot be avoided after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect on drainage volume of pre-closure axillary lavage with physiologic saline, gentamicin solution, or clindamycin solution.

METHODS

A randomized study was performed between January 2013 and October 2014. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of breast neoplasm and plans to undergo an elective ALND because of axillary metastases. The patients were randomized into three groups: Two lavages with 500 mL of physiologic saline (Group 1), lavage with 500 mL of saline followed by lavage with 500 mL of a 240-mg gentamicin solution (Group 2), and lavage with 500 mL of saline followed by lavage with 500 mL of a 600-mg clindamycin solution (Group 3).

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients were included. The mean number of days with a drain in place was 7.1±3 in Group 1, 4.1±1.2 in Group 2, and 6.4±2.1 in Group 3 (p<0.001). Total drainage volume before tube removal was 435.3±220.1 mL in Group 1, 155.2±82.4 mL in Group 2, and 352.3±212.9 mL in Group 3 (p=0.03). In a pairwise analysis, irrigation with gentamicin solution achieved a lower drainage volume and a reduction in the number of days of drainage maintenance compared with the other two groups.

CONCLUSION

The post-operative output of the axillary drain is substantially lower in patients undergoing lavage of the surgical bed with a gentamicin solution than in patients undergoing lavage with physiologic saline or clindamycin solution.

Effect of gentamicin lavage of the axillary surgical bed after lymph node dissection on drainage discharge volume

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of axillary lavage with a gentamicin solution before wound closure on drainage volume.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized study was performed. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of breast neoplasms and plans to undergo an elective axillary lymph node dissection due to axillary metastasis. The patients were randomized into 2 groups: patients undergoing 2 lavages with 500 ml normal saline (Group 1) and patients first undergoing lavage with 500 ml normal saline followed by a second lavage with a 500 ml of a gentamicin (240 mg) solution (Group 2). Microbiological samples were obtained before any lavage, after each lavage and at the time of drain removal.

RESULTS

40 patients were included. Mean number of days maintaining the drain in place was 7.7 ± 3.2 days in Group 1 and 4.3 ± 1.4 days in Group 2 (p = 0.001). Total drainage volume before removal was 465 ± 250.9 ml in Group 1 and 169 ± 102.2 ml in Group 2 (p = 0.003). After a second lavage with normal saline in Group 1 and after a lavage with gentamicin solution in Group 2, microbiological culture was positive in 10 patients (50%) in Group 1 and 1 case (5%) in Group 2 (p = 0.016). Positive cultures were associated with higher drainage volumes.

CONCLUSION

The postoperative drainage volume of the axillary drain is significantly lower in the patients undergoing a lavage of the surgical bed with a gentamicin solution than in the control group undergoing a lavage with normal saline. A significant reduction in the contamination is only obtained after a lavage with gentamicin solution.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01700504.

Predictive factors of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Since the introduction of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with breast cancer, micrometastases and isolated tumor cells are detected frequently in the SLN. As such, they offer an opportunity to study the development of regional metastases in breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 1999 and November 2010 1418 patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer underwent SLNB. Primary tumor characteristics and information regarding regional lymph node involvement were collected prospectively. Patients were categorized into four levels of lymph node involvement: pN0, pN0(i+), pN1mi and pN ≥ 1a. An univariate analysis and a binary logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the relation between patient- and tumor characteristics and lymph node involvement.

RESULTS

Increasing tumor size and younger age were associated with a higher risk of pN1mi and pN ≥ 1a and a lower chance of pN0 and pN0(i+). Triple negative molecular subtype was associated with a decreased risk of pN1mi and pN ≥ 1a. Tumor size was positively related to overall occurrence of regional lymph node metastases in a linear manner.

CONCLUSION

Patients with larger tumors, no triple negative disease, and younger age showed a decreased chance of both pN0 and pN0(i+) and an increased risk of both pN1mi and pN ≥ 1a. There seems to be a gradual shift in risk pattern from pN0 to pN0(i+) to pN1mi and to pN ≥ 1a-disease. The presence of the smallest metastases remained fairly constant over time when compared to macrometastases. This constant presence suggests that the risk of seeding and outgrowth of metastases remains constant over time.

Breast cancer: from "maximum tolerable" to "minimum effective" treatment

Randomized trials have played a fundamental role in identifying better treatments for most type of diseases, especially in the oncological field. In breast cancer, the shift from “maximum tolerable” to “minimum effective” treatment has been evident since the 1970s and has been based on the results of international randomized trials. The progress of breast surgery represents an excellent model of the evolution of science and the aim of this article is to review the main randomized studies that changed everyday practice in breast surgery.

Evaluation of axillary lymph nodes by diffusion-weighted MRI using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide in patients with breast cancer: initial clinical experience

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic performance and clinical feasibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) in the evaluation of axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with known breast cancer underwent 1.5 T MRI. Axial diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) and conventional T1- and T2*-weighted images (CIs) were acquired before and 24-36 hours after intravenous administration of USPIO. Detection of ALNs was evaluated on DWIs in comparison with CIs. The apparent diffusion coefficient values (ADCvs) of the nonmetastatic and metastatic nodes in precontrast DWIs were determined. The diagnostic performance of DWI using USPIO was compared with that of CIs using USPIO with pathological correlation.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 286 ALNs, 216/286 (76%) nodes were detected on DWIs and 238/286 (83%) on CIs. The differences in the ADCvs between metastatic and nonmetastatic nodes were not significant (P = 0.06). Sensitivity of CIs and DWIs using USPIO were respectively 70% and 83%, specificity 98% and 98%, and overall accuracy 93% and 95%.

CONCLUSION

Although the detection on DWIs of ALNs in patients with breast cancer was inferior compared to CIs, the sensitivity and accuracy of DWIs using USPIO were superior in the diagnosis of ALNs metastasis.

[Prevalence of micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in the sentinel node at early stage breast cancer]

AIM

To analyze the prevalence of isolated tumor cells (ITC) and micrometastases in the sentinel node of early stage breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 234 patients diagnosed of breast cancer, stages T1 or T2, with no axillary involvement detected by palpation or ultrasound-FNA, were studied. The sentinel node (SN) was identified by lymphoscintigraphy and removed in the operating room. Serial sections and immunohistochemical staining were then performed, classifying them as negative (SN-), negative with ITC (SN-ITC), positive with micrometastases (SN+mic) and positive with macrometastases (SN+mac). A complete axillary lymphadenectomy (CAL) was carried out in those cases with micro- or macrometastases, the former being classified as negative (CAL-), positive with micrometatases (CAL+mic), and positive with macrometastases (CAL+mac). The follow-up ranged from 6-71 months.

RESULTS

ITC were found in 12 patients (5.1%) and micrometastases in 24 (10.3%). Thus, a total of 36 patients were affected by some of these conditions (15.4%). In the group with micrometastases, the result of CAL was CAL- in 19/24 (79.1%), CAL+mic in 2 (8.3%) and CAL+mac in 3 (12.5%). No axillary recurrences have occurred up to date.

CONCLUSIONS

ITC and micrometastases were found in the sentinel node in a significant percentage of patients in the early stages of breast cancer. The low percentage of further axillary invasion in the group of micrometastases may open up the possibility of avoiding CAL in favor of other adjuvant treatments (chemotherapy, radiotherapy).

Meta-analysis of predictive factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive SLN

AIMS

A meta-analysis was performed to identify the clinicopathological variables most predictive of non-sentinel node (NSN) metastases when the sentinel node is positive.

METHODS

A Medline search was conducted that ultimately identified 56 candidate studies. Original data were abstracted from each study and used to calculate odds ratios. The random-effects model was used to combine odds ratios to determine the strength of the associations.

FINDINGS

The 8 individual characteristics found to be significantly associated with the highest likelihood (odds ratio >2) of NSN metastases are SLN metastases >2mm in size, extracapsular extension in the SLN, >1 positive SLN, ≤1 negative SLN, tumour size >2cm, ratio of positive sentinel nodes >50% and lymphovascular invasion in the primary tumour. The histological method of detection, which is associated with the size of metastases, had a correspondingly high odds ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified 8 factors predictive of NSN metastases that should be recorded and evaluated routinely in SLN databases. These factors should be included in a predictive model that is generally applicable among different populations.

Randomised phase II trial of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients with chronic arm lymphoedema after radiotherapy for cancer

BACKGROUND

A non-randomised phase II study suggested a therapeutic effect of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy on arm lymphoedema following adjuvant radiotherapy for early breast cancer, justifying further investigation in a randomised trial.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with ≥ 15% increase in arm volume after supraclavicular ± axillary radiotherapy (axillary surgery in 52/58 patients) were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to HBO (n=38) or to best standard care (n=20). The HBO group breathed 100% oxygen at 2.4 atmospheres absolute for 100 min on 30 occasions over 6 weeks. Primary endpoint was ipsilateral limb volume expressed as a percentage of contralateral limb volume. Secondary endpoints included fractional removal rate of radioisotopic tracer from the arm, extracellular water content, patient self-assessments and UK SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire.

FINDINGS

Of 53/58 (91.4%) patients with baseline assessments, 46 had 12-month assessments (86.8%). Median volume of ipsilateral limb (relative to contralateral) at baseline was 133.5% (IQR 126.0-152.3%) in the control group, and 135.5% (IQR 126.5-146.0%) in the treatment group. Twelve months after baseline the median (IQR) volume of the ipsilateral limb was 131.2% (IQR 122.7-151.5%) in the control group and 133.5% (IQR 122.3-144.9%) in the treatment group. Results for the secondary endpoints were similar between randomised groups.

INTERPRETATION

No evidence has been found of a beneficial effect of HBO in the treatment of arm lymphoedema following primary surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for early breast cancer.

[Micrometastasis in the sentinel node and axillary lymph node macro-metastasis in breast cancer]

AIM

The study of the sentinel node has made it possible to obtain more comprehensive knowledge about the extent of axillary involvement in breast cancer. It has also decreased the surgical morbidity associated to the surgical examination of the axilla. The systematic use of immunohistochemical staining and molecular biology techniques improves the ability to detect the presence of micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells in a significant number of cases when this is the only sign of the lymph node extension of the disease. The possibility of avoiding complete axillary lymphadenectomy in those patients who are only affected by micrometastasis is proposed because of the low incidence of further involvement of the remaining lymph nodes.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

159 patients diagnosed of stage T1 or T2 breast cancer, in which the sentinel node had been identified by scintigraphy and intraoperative localization, were included in the study. Complete axillary lymphadenectomy was performed when micro- or macrometastases were found in the sentinel node, in order to determine the degree of axillary involvement.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients (25%) showed infiltration of the sentinel node. This infiltration was only by micrometastasis in 17 of them (10.7%). Of these 17 patients, only 2 (11.8%) showed macro-metastasis in the lymphadenectomy. In the remaining subjects, the final staging reached after the sentinel node study was not modified.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to speculate that, in the future, axillary dissection can be avoided in those patients diagnosed of micrometastasis in the sentinel node, pending the conclusions of the on-going multicenter studies.

Sentinel node identification rate and nodal involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial

Background

The randomized EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial investigates whether breast cancer patients with a tumor-positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) are best treated with an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy (ART). The aim of the current substudy was to evaluate the identification rate and the nodal involvement.

Methods

The first 2,000 patients participating in the AMAROS trial were evaluated. Associations between the identification rate and technical, patient-, and tumor-related factors were evaluated. The outcome of the SNB procedure and potential further nodal involvement was assessed.

Results

In 65 patients, the sentinel node could not be identified. As a result, the sentinel node identification rate was 97% (1,888 of 1,953). Variables affecting the success rate were age, pathological tumor size, histology, year of accrual, and method of detection. The SNB results of 65% of the patients (n = 1,220) were negative and the patients underwent no further axillary treatment. The SNB results were positive in 34% of the patients (n = 647), including macrometastases (n = 409, 63%), micrometastases (n = 161, 25%), and isolated tumor cells (n = 77, 12%). Further nodal involvement in patients with macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells undergoing an ALND was 41, 18, and 18%, respectively.

Conclusions

With a 97% detection rate in this prospective international multicenter study, the SNB procedure is highly effective, especially when the combined method is used. Further nodal involvement in patients with micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in the sentinel node was similar—both were 18%.

Role of axillary clearance after a tumor-positive sentinel node in the administration of adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer

PURPOSE The After Mapping of the Axilla: Radiotherapy or Surgery? (AMAROS) phase III study compares axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and axillary radiation therapy (ART) in early breast cancer patients with tumor-positive sentinel nodes. In the ART arm, the extent of nodal involvement remains unknown, which could have implications on the administration of adjuvant therapy. In this preliminary analysis, we studied the influence of random assignment to ALND or ART on the choice for adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the first 2,000 patients enrolled in the AMAROS trial, we analyzed the administration of adjuvant systemic therapy. Multivariate analysis was used to assess variables affecting the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant therapy was applied according to institutional guidelines. Results Of 2,000 patients, 566 patients had a positive sentinel node and were treated per random assignment. There was no significant difference in the administration of adjuvant systemic therapy. In the ALND and ART arms, 58% (175 of 300) and 61% (162 of 266) of the patients, respectively, received chemotherapy. Endocrine therapy was administered in 78% (235 of 300) of the patients in the ALND arm and in 76% (203 of 266) of the patients in the ART arm. Treatment arm was not a significant factor in the decision, and no interactions between treatment arm and other factors were observed. Multivariate analysis showed that age, tumor grade, multifocality, and size of the sentinel node metastasis significantly affected the administration of chemotherapy. Within the ALND arm, the extent of nodal involvement remained not significant in a sensitivity multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Absence of knowledge regarding the extent of nodal involvement in the ART arm appears to have no major impact on the administration of adjuvant therapy.

Analysis of predictive tools for further axillary involvement in patients with sentinel lymph node positive small (≤15 mm) invasive breast cancer

Small breast cancers often require different treatment than larger ones. The frequency and predictability of further nodal involvement was evaluated in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes and breast cancers ≤15 mm by means of 8 different predictive tools. Of 506 patients with such small tumors 138 with positive sentinel nodes underwent axillary dissection and 39 of these had non-sentinel node involvement too. The Stanford nomogram and the micrometastatic nomogram were the predictive tools identifying a small group of patients with low probability of further axillary involvement that might not require completion axillary lymph node dissection. Our data also suggest that the Tenon score can separate subsets of patients with a low and a higher risk of non-sentinel node metastasis. Predictive tools based on multivariate models can help in omitting completion axillary dissection in patients with low risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis based on their small tumor size.

Patterns of care in Dutch postmenopausal patients with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer participating in the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial

BACKGROUND

The Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial investigates the efficacy and safety of adjuvant exemestane alone and in sequence after tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer. As there was a nationwide participation in The Netherlands, we studied the variations in patterns of care in the Comprehensive Cancer Centre Regions (CCCRs) and compliance with national guidelines.

METHODS

Clinicopathological characteristics, carried out local treatment strategies and adjuvant chemotherapy data were collected.

RESULTS

From 2001 to January 2006, 2754 Dutch patients were randomised to the study. Mean age of patients was 65 years (standard deviation 9). Tumours were < or =2 cm in 46% (within CCCRs 39%-50%), node-negative disease varied from 25% to 45%, and PgR status was determined in 75%-100% of patients. Mastectomy was carried out in 55% (45%-70%), sentinel lymph node procedure in 68% (42%-79%) and axillary lymph node dissections in 77% (67%-83%) of patients, all different between CCCRs (P < 0.0001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 15%-70% of eligible patients (P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

In spite of national guidelines, breast cancer treatment on specific issues widely varied between the various Dutch regions. These data provide valuable information for breast cancer organisations indicating (lack of) guideline adherence and areas for breast cancer care improvement.

Positive sentinel lymph node biopsy predicts the number of metastatic axillary nodes of breast cancer

It remains to be clarified whether a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can predict the number of metastatic axillary nodes. This study examined a consecutive series of women with unilateral invasive breast cancer who underwent axillary lymph node dissection after an intra-operative positive SLNB. The numbers of positive and negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were analyzed for a likelihood of pN1a, pN2a, and pN3a diseases as per the UICC TNM classification. Of the 368 study patients, 165 (45%) had one positive SLN and one or more negative SLNs. This result represented the most common combination of positive and negative SLNs. It was also the most predictive indicator (93%) of pN1a disease and the least predictive indicator (7% or 0%) of pN2a or pN3a disease, respectively. The numbers of positive and negative SLNs can predict the number of metastatic axillary nodes in breast cancer patients.

The value of level III clearance in patients with axillary and sentinel node positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The value of level III axillary clearance is contentious, with great variance worldwide in the extent and levels of clearance performed.

OBJECTIVE

To determine rates of level III positivity in patients undergoing level I-III axillary clearance, and identify which patients are at highest risk of involved level III nodes.

METHODS

From a database of 2850 patients derived from symptomatic and population-based screening service, 1179 patients who underwent level I-III clearance between the years 1999-2007 were identified. The pathology, surgical details, and prior sentinel nodes biopsies of patients were recorded.

RESULTS

Eleven hundred seventy nine patients had level I-III axillary clearance. Of the patients, 63% (n = 747) were node positive. Of patients with node positive disease, 23% (n = 168) were level II positive and 19% (n = 141) were level III positive. Two hundred fifty patients had positive sentinel node biopsies prior to axillary clearance. Of these, 12% (n = 30) and 9% (n = 22) were level II and level III positive, respectively. On multivariate analysis, factors predictive of level III involvement in patients with node positive disease were tumor size (P < 0.001, OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.2-1.5), invasive lobular disease (P < 0.001, OR = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.9-6.95), extranodal extension (P < 0.001, OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.18-0.4), and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.04, OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35-1). Lobular invasive disease (P = 0.049, OR = 4.1; 95% CI: 1-16.8), extranodal spread (P = 0.003, OR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06-0.57), and having more than one positive sentinel node (P = 0.009, OR = 4.9; 95% CI: 1.5-16.1) were predictive of level III involvement in patients with sentinel node positive disease.

CONCLUSION

Level III clearance has a selective but definite role to play in patients who have node positive breast carcinoma. Pathological characteristics of the primary tumor are of particular use in identifying those who are at various risk of level III nodal involvement.

Management of the axilla after the finding of a positive sentinel lymph node: a proposal for an evidence-based risk-adapted algorithm

Axillary lymph node dissection after the finding of a positive sentinel lymph node is a common clinical practice. A review is performed for the efficacy and morbidity of axillary lymph node dissection, the rationale for nonsurgical management of the axilla, and the efficacy, technical limitations, and toxicity of axillary radiation therapy; a management algorithm is then proposed based upon currently available prediction tools.

Use of the Oncotype DX 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant decision making in early-stage breast cancer

The decision to use adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early stage breast cancer involves the consideration of many factors that traditionally rely heavily on tumor size and lymph node involvement and a limited set of biologic characteristics such as estrogen receptor and HER2 expression. Overtreatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy is a significant concern among patients and physicians. Using the currently accepted guidelines it has been estimated that a large percentage of patients receiving chemotherapy for low-risk breast cancers may be overtreated. Gene expression profiling is a new technology being developed to help improve risk stratification of patients and to predict outcomes. The Oncotype DXtrade mark assay is one example of a gene expression profile validated in women with lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-expressing breast cancer. This assay and others aim to help improve risk classification and recurrence prediction and, therefore, optimize selection of patients for adjuvant chemotherapy.

A model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastatic disease when the sentinel lymph node is positive

BACKGROUND

Women with axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive breast cancer usually undergo completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, not all patients with positive SLNs have further axillary nodal disease. Therefore, in the patients with low risk of further disease, completion ALND could be avoided. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) developed a nomogram to estimate the risk of non-SLN disease. This study critically appraised the nomogram and refined the model to improve predictive accuracy.

METHODS

The MSKCC nomogram was applied to 118 patients with a positive axillary SLN biopsy who subsequently had completion ALND. Predictive accuracy was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. A further predictive model was developed using more detailed pathological information. Backward stepwise multiple logistic regression was used to develop the predictive model for further axillary lymph node disease. This was then converted to a probability score. After k-fold cross-validation within the data, an inverse variance weighted mean ROC curve and area below the ROC curve was calculated.

RESULTS

The MSKCC nomogram had an area under the ROC curve of 68 per cent. The revised predictive model showed the weighted mean area under the ROC curve to be 84 per cent.

CONCLUSION

The modified predictive model, which incorporated size of SLN metastasis, improved predictive accuracy, although further testing on an independent data set is desirable.

Management of the axilla in women with breast cancer: current clinical practice and a new selective targeted approach

BACKGROUND

Axillary nodal status is the most important prognostic factor for patients with breast cancer. Clinical assessment and imaging modalities are not always reliable. Surgical removal and histopathological examination of axillary lymph nodes remain essential methods of staging the axilla. However, the optimal management of the axilla remains uncertain.

METHODS

We performed Medline searches to identify relevant systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and nonrandomized and randomized controlled trials for the past 5 years (up to December 2007), as well as important historical articles and clinical guidelines relating to management of the axilla in women with breast cancer.

RESULTS

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been the standard surgical approach for many years. It is, however, associated with marked morbidity; survival benefit remains uncertain. Axillary node sampling, widely practiced in the United Kingdom, is a reliable alternative procedure in staging the axilla, with less morbidity. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become an accurate method for staging the axilla in women with operable, clinically node-negative breast cancer. SLNB alone appears to be a safe and acceptable procedure for patients with uninvolved SLNs. Completion ALND or axillary radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for patients with tumor-involved SLNs. SLNB is associated with less morbidity than ALND. However, long-term follow-up and therapeutic outcomes are being awaited from randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Several procedures are available for staging and treating the axilla. A tailored surgical approach, with careful assessment of risk-benefit and patient preference, is guiding the evolving modern management of the axilla for women with breast cancer.

Sentinel node biopsy: interpretation and management of patients with immunohistochemistry-positive sentinel nodes and those with micrometastases

The sentinel node procedure is an adequate tool to identify lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. Sentinel nodes are generally examined with greater attention mainly to exclude, as reliably as possible, lymph node metastasis. To achieve this, many protocols are used, resulting in different rates of micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells encountered. Since the prognostic significance of isolated tumor cells or micrometastasis in the sentinel nodes, and the risk of further axillary lymph node involvement in patients with isolated tumor cells, is uncertain and at most limited, these findings may pose difficulties for clinicians in clinical decision making. Protocols that identify lymph node metastasis, from which the clinical relevance is known, are warranted. Unnecessary lymph node dissections should be avoided.

Avoidance of axillary lymph node dissection in selected patients with node-positive breast cancer

AIMS

Currently, it is standard practice to avoid ALND in patients with negative SLN, whereas this procedure is mandated for those with positive SLN. However, there has been some debate regarding the necessity of complete ALND in all patients with positive SLN. This review article discusses the issues related to eliminating the need for ALND in selected patients with positive nodes.

METHODS

A review of the English language medical literature was performed using the MEDLINE database and cross-referencing major articles on the subject, focusing on the last 10 years.

RESULTS

Currently, complete ALND is mandated in patients with SLN macrometastases as well as those with clinically positive nodes. It is not clear whether SLN biopsy is appropriate for axillary staging in patients with initially clinically positive nodes (N1) that become clinically node-negative (N0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although there is debate regarding whether ALND should be performed in patients with micrometastases in the SLN, it seems premature to abandon ALND in clinical practice. Moreover, it remains unclear whether it is appropriate to avoid complete ALND in patients with ITC-positive SLN alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of data from randomised trials, the long-term impact of SLN biopsy alone on axillary recurrence and survival rate in patients with SLN micrometastases as well as those with ITC-positive SLN remains uncertain. These important issues must be determined by careful analysis of the results of ongoing clinical trials.

Current technical overviews of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is based on the hypothesis that the sentinel lymph node (SLN) reflects the lymph-node status and a negative SLN might allow complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to be avoided. Although the survival outcome is still unknown, this technique has already become a standard of care for breast cancer patients. However, it is still important to discuss current techniques and some controversies. This article reviews these issues for a variety of SLNB techniques.

Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial

BACKGROUND

The goals of axillary-lymph-node dissection (ALND) are to maximise survival, provide regional control, and stage the patient. However, this technique has substantial side-effects. The purpose of the B-32 trial is to establish whether sentinel-lymph-node (SLN) resection can achieve the same therapeutic goals as conventional ALND but with decreased side-effects. The aim of this paper is to report the technical success and accuracy of SLN resection plus ALND versus SLN resection alone.

METHODS

5611 women with invasive breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either SLN resection followed by immediate conventional ALND (n=2807; group 1) or SLN resection without ALND if SLNs were negative on intraoperative cytology and histological examination (n=2804; group 2) in the B-32 trial. Patients in group 2 underwent ALND if no SLNs were identified or if one or more SLNs were positive on intraoperative cytology or subsequent histological examination. Primary endpoints, including survival, regional control, and morbidity, will be reported later. Secondary endpoints are accuracy and technical success and are reported here. This trial is registered with the Clinical Trial registry, number NCT00003830.

FINDINGS

Data for technical success were available for 5536 of 5611 patients; 75 declined protocol treatment, had no SLNs removed, or had no SLN resection done. SLNs were successfully removed in 97.2% of patients (5379 of 5536) in both groups combined. Identification of a preincision hot spot was associated with greater SLN removal (98.9% [5072 of 5128]). Only 1.4% (189 of 13171) of SLN specimens were outside of axillary levels I and II. 65.1% (8571 of 13 171) of SLN specimens were both radioactive and blue; a small percentage was identified by palpation only (3.9% [515 of 13 171]). The overall accuracy of SLN resection in patients in group 1 was 97.1% (2544 of 2619; 95% CI 96.4-97.7), with a false-negative rate of 9.8% (75 of 766; 95% CI 7.8-12.2). Differences in tumour location, type of biopsy, and number of SLNs removed significantly affected the false-negative rate. Allergic reactions related to blue dye occurred in 0.7% (37 of 5588) of patients with data on toxic effects.

INTERPRETATION

The findings reported here indicate excellent balance in clinical patient characteristics between the two randomised groups and that the success of SLN resection was high. These findings are important because the B-32 trial is the only trial of sufficient size to provide definitive information related to the primary outcome measures of survival and regional control. Removal of more than one SLN and avoidance of excisional biopsy are important variables in reducing the false-negative rate.

Blue Dye Injection in the Arm in Order to Conserve the Lymphatic Drainage of the Arm in Breast Cancer Patients Requiring an Axillary Dissection

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread use of the sentinel lymph node biopsy technique, many patients with invasive breast cancer still undergo an axillary lymph node dissection and are at risk of arm lymphedema. With the new awareness of lymphatic spread in the axillary nodes, it should be possible to define a new surgical approach between sentinel lymph node biopsy and complete axillary dissection, a procedure preserving specifically lymph nodes in relation to the arm.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with an operable breast cancer requiring an axillary dissection underwent surgery with an attempt to separate nodes related to the breast from specific nodes related to the arm. After an injection of blue dye in the arm, the surgeon performed the axillary dissection trying to identify blue nodes and ducts in order to preserve lymphatic arm drainage (LAD). If the blue nodes were located in the normal axillary dissection, they were removed separately.

RESULTS

In 15 of 21 patients (71%), blue nodes in relation with LAD were identified. In 10 (47%) patients, it was possible to dissect the LAD with the preservation lymphatic ducts. In 10 patients, the LAD nodes were removed: none of them contained metastases, despite the fact that the non-LAD axillary nodes contained metastases in 7 of 10 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying the LAD with blue dye injection in the arm is possible. A subsequent study can now begin to determine if this procedure is safe for patients and able to prevent lymphedema of the arm.

Clinical trials for sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer

Sentinel-node biopsy (SNB) has already been applied in clinical practice. However, there are no long-term data regarding sentinel node (SN). Three critical questions about SNB can be posed as follows: "Is the predictive power of the axillary status using SNB the same as using ALND?", "Does SNB reduce complications of breast surgery?", and "What is the effect of SNB on long-term survival and on the local control of the axilla?". This article introduces clinical trial update consisting of a review of six major prospective studies. Each trial was designed to attempt to address these questions. With limited data from the trials, we should consider the advantages and faults of SNB based on the answers to the questions.

Evaluation of lymph node metastases of breast cancer using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

We assessed the utility of enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) in the evaluation of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

MR examination of the axilla was performed before and 24-36 h after USPIO administration for patients with stage II or III breast cancer. Diagnostic performance was compared using size criteria (metastasis was defined when short axis diameter >5 or >10mm) or morphologic criteria on conventional MRI, the combined study of USPIO precontrast and postcontrast images, and USPIO postcontrast study alone.

RESULTS

A total of 622 nodes (503 metastatic and 119 nonmetastatic nodes) were dissected from 33 patients. The results of conventional MRI for nodes >5mm were 59.1% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, and 80.4% overall accuracy. Results for nodes >10mm were 15.7% sensitivity, 99.2% specificity, and 80.2% overall accuracy. Results based on morphology were 36.5% sensitivity, 94.1% specificity, and 81.0% overall accuracy. The results of the combined study of USPIO precontrast and postcontrast images were 86.4% sensitivity, 97.5% specificity, 91.1% positive predictive value, 96.1% negative predictive value, and 95.0% overall accuracy. The results of USPIO postcontrast images alone were 84.7% sensitivity, 96.8% specificity, and 94.0% overall accuracy. Patient-based results of postcontrast USPIO study alone were 100.0% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, and 93.9% overall accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

USPIO postcontrast study alone was useful in the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Sentinel Node Biopsy and Concomitant Probe-Guided Tumor Excision of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Preliminary data have shown encouraging results of a single intratumoral radiopharmaceutical injection that enables both sentinel node biopsy and probe-guided excision of the primary tumor in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate this approach in a large group of patients.

METHODS

Lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 368 patients with nonpalpable breast cancer after intratumoral injection of (99m)Tc-nanocolloid (.2 mL, 123 MBq, 3.3 mCi) guided by ultrasound or stereotaxis. The sentinel node was pursued with the aid of vital blue dye (1.0 mL, intratumoral) and a gamma ray detection probe. In case of breast-conserving surgery, the probe was used to guide the excision.

RESULTS

At least one sentinel node could be identified intraoperatively in 357 patients (97%), of whom 69 had involved nodes (19%). Age over 60 years was associated with less frequent nonaxillary lymphatic drainage and absence of internal mammary chain dissemination. Tumor-free margins were obtained in 262 (89%) of the 293 patients who underwent segmental excision. Re-excision of the primary tumor bed was performed in six patients (2%). During a median follow-up of 22 months, one breast recurrence and one axillary recurrence were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphatic mapping and probe-guided tumor excision of nonpalpable breast cancer by intralesional administration of a single dose of (99m)Tc-nanocolloid and blue dye resulted in 97% identification of the sentinel node and in tumor-free margins in 89% of the patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery. Longer follow-up is needed to substantiate the accuracy and safety of this technique.

Is axillary clearance the standard of care for breast cancer patients with sentinel node involvement?

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has become accepted for staging the axilla in early breast cancer with avoidance of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with negative SNB. For those with positive SNB, the standard surgical management is ALND; however, this approach is increasingly being challenged. The central problem is that it is not possible to preoperatively predict whether the SNB will be positive, and it is even more difficult to determine the likelihood of nonsentinel node positivity. Various histopathological features indicate increased risk of nonsentinel node metastasis, including size of SNB metastasis, presence of lymphovascular invasion, multifocality, number of involved sentinel nodes and, conversely, the number of negative sentinel nodes. These features have been combined to produce predictive nomograms but, understandably, these still lack precision. Presently, the decision to avoid ALND will depend upon both the clinician and the patient's impression of risk, but if either requires assurance that no residual axillary disease remains, a completion clearance will be required.

Tumour response to preoperative anthracycline-based chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: the predictive role of p53 expression

The aim of this retrospective study was to identify markers capable of predicting pathological complete (pCR) and overall clinical tumour response to preoperative anthracycline-based chemotherapy and clinical outcome in women with operable breast cancer. Therefore, we used the pre-treatment core biopsies from 107 patients who were enrolled in the EORTC trial 10902 to analyse tumour characteristics and the oncogenic markers Bcl-2, p53, ER, PgR, HER2, and p21. Median follow-up was 7 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.89-7.45). pCR was seen in seven patients (6.5%) and was associated with improved overall survival (hazards ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.05-2.56; P = 0.30). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, pCR was independently predicted by p53 overexpression estimated by immunohistochemistry (odds ratio [OR], 16.83; 95% CI, 1.78-159.33; P = 0.01). Fifty-eight patients showed clinical tumour response (>50% decrease in tumour size), however responders experienced no benefit in clinical outcome. Clinical tumour response was independently predicted by p53 overexpression (OR, 5.57; 95% CI, 1.58-19.65; P = 0.008) and small clinical tumour size (OR, 10.26; 95% CI, 2.01-52.48; P = 0.005). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, negative pathological lymph node status, low tumour grade and use of tamoxifen showed improved overall survival. In conclusion, our data suggest p53 expression is of predictive significance in anthracycline-containing chemotherapeutic regimens.

Additional axillary metastases and stage migration in breast cancer patients with micrometastases or submicrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

In patients with breast cancer, micrometastases and submicrometastases are increasingly found in sentinel nodes when step sectioning and/or immunohistochemical staining are applied. The aims of the current study were to investigate the incidence of micro- and submicrometastases in the sentinel node, to estimate the risk of additional metastases in the remaining axillary lymph nodes, and to consider implications for staging and treatment.

METHODS

A total of 2150 breast cancer patients who had undergone axillary sentinel node biopsy between 1999 and 2004 were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

In all, 649 patients (30%) had a tumor-positive axillary sentinel node. Of these 649 patients, 148 had (23%) micrometastases and 105 (16%) submicrometastases. Of the 148 patients with micrometastases, 106 underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and additional metastases were found in 20 patients (19%). Sixteen (15%) had macrometastases and were upstaged. The other 4 patients had additional micrometastases. Seven of the 106 patients (7%) received additional systemic treatment based on the findings in the axillary lymph nodes. Fifty-four of the 105 patients with submicrometastases underwent ALND. Two (4%) of them had additional macrometastases and were upstaged and 2 had additional micrometastases. None received additional treatment based on the ALND findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the involved sentinel nodes, 23% contained micrometastases and 16% submicrometastases. Additional macrometastases were found in 15% and 4%, respectively, and treatment was altered in 7%. Based on these findings, offering additional treatment of the axilla is suggested in patients with micrometastases, but refraining from ALND in patients with submicrometastases in their sentinel node.

Ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology can spare breast cancer patients unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy

BACKGROUND

Some 30% to 40% of the breast cancer patients scheduled for sentinel node biopsy have axillary metastasis. Pilot studies suggest that ultrasonography is useful in the preoperative detection of such nodes. The aims of this study were to evaluate the sensitivity of preoperative ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology for detecting axillary metastases and to assess how often sentinel node biopsy could be avoided.

METHODS

Between October 1999 and December 2003, 726 patients with clinically negative lymph nodes were eligible for sentinel node biopsy. A total of 732 axillae were examined. Preoperative ultrasonography with subsequent fine-needle aspiration cytology in case of suspicious lymph nodes was performed in all patients. The sentinel node procedure was omitted in patients with tumor-positive axillary lymph nodes in lieu of axillary lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

Ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration cytology established axillary metastases in 58 (8%) of the 726 patients. These 58 were 21% of the total of 271 patients who were proven to have axillary metastasis in the end. Of the patients with ultrasonographically suspicious lymph nodes and negative cytology, 31% had tumor-positive sentinel nodes. Patients with preoperatively established metastases by ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology had more tumor-positive lymph nodes (P < .001) than patients with metastases established later on.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology is 21%, and unnecessary sentinel node biopsy is avoided in 8% of the patients. This approach improves the selection of patients eligible for sentinel node biopsy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer—“one fits all”?

Adjuvant breast cancer therapy and early diagnosis will improve breast cancer outcome. The Eurocare studies have demonstrated large differences in breast cancer incidence and mortality in different regions and countries and underlined the importance of access and quality in the management of early disease. So far, the very important survival gains by adjuvant therapy have been obtained by "one fits all"--like strategies, resulting in therapy in vain for many patients and unnecessary therapy for large cohorts. Present adjuvant strategies have focused on group statistical risk analysis, mainly using tumour stage, histological grade and receptor status. Five retrospective studies have revealed a worse outcome for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy without toxicity. In one of these studies the breast cancer survival was improved by 10% for patients who received grade 2/3 neutropenia; this is equivalent to the described survival gains by the addition of anthracyclines and taxanes to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) combinations. Prospectively, this has been explored in the Scandinavian Breast Group (SBG) 9401-, SBG 2000-1- and presently in the SBG 2004-1 studies using tailored chemotherapy dosage strategies, aimed at avoiding under-dosage and diminishing acute side effects. For the future, we need several predictive factors for therapy, allowing better and more tailored therapy selections for individuals at risk. The present explorations of tumour RNA expression profiles are most likely to be useful in identifying therapy-predictive profiles for these individuals. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data reveal marked differences in effect and tolerance of used drugs. The development of single nucleotide polymorphism technology are also likely to be important for optimising dosing strategies, aiming and increasing the effect, as well as decreasing toxicity. Taken together these strategies will be very different from the present "one fits all" concept.

Gene expression profiling and breast cancer care: What are the potential benefits and policy implications?

PURPOSE

Gene expression profiling has been proposed as an alternative to clinical guidelines to identify high-risk patients for adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the outcomes associated with gene expression profiling are not clear, and guidelines for the appropriate use of genomic technologies have not been established.

METHODS

We developed a decision analytic model to evaluate the incremental cost and quality-adjusted life years of gene expression profiling versus NIH clinical guidelines in a hypothetical cohort of premenopausal early stage breast cancer patients 44 years of age. We conducted empirical analyses and identified literature-based data to inform the model, and performed probabilistic sensitivity analyses to evaluate uncertainty in the results. We interpreted the implications of our findings for treatment guidelines and policies.

RESULTS

Use of gene expression profiling resulted in an absolute 5% decrease in the proportion of cases of distant recurrence prevented, 0.21 fewer quality-adjusted life years, and a cost savings of USD 2882. The chosen test cutoff value to identify a tumor as poor prognosis and the cost of adjuvant chemotherapy were the most influential parameters in the analysis, but our findings did not change substantially in sensitivity analyses. Regardless of the test cutoff used to identify a poor prognosis tumor, the gene expression profiling assay studied in our analysis, at its current level of performance, did not attain the threshold sensitivity (95%) necessary to produce equal or greater quality-adjusted life years than NIH guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Although the use of gene expression profiling in breast cancer care holds great promise, our analysis suggests additional refinement and validation are needed before use in clinical practice.