Effects of discontinuing or continuing ongoing statin therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study

Elevated free cholesterol levels due to impaired reverse cholesterol transport are a risk factor for polymicrobial sepsis in mice

Dysregulated lipid metabolism is commonly observed in septic patients, but how it contributes to sepsis remains largely unknown. Reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) is crucial for regulating cholesterol metabolism in circulation. During RCT, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) collects cholesterol from peripheral tissues and transports it to the liver's scavenger receptor BI (SR-BI), where SR-BI mediates the uptake of cholesteryl esters from HDL for excretion via bile. In this study, we utilized AlbCreSR-BIfl/fl mice, a model with impaired RCT, to investigate the impact of RCT on sepsis. We found that AlbCreSR-BIfl/fl mice were significantly more susceptible to cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-induced polymicrobial sepsis, with a survival rate of 14.3% compared to 80% in SR-BIfl/fl littermates. Mechanistically, sepsis disrupted cholesterol metabolism, causing a 4.8-fold increase in free cholesterol (FC) levels and a 4-fold increase in the FC/cholesteryl ester (CE) ratio in AlbCreSR-BIfl/fl mice compared to SR-BIfl/fl littermates. This disruption led to hemolysis and death. Notably, administering the cholesterol-lowering drug probucol normalized FC levels and the FC/CE ratio, and significantly improved survival in CLP-AlbCreSR-BIfl/fl mice. However, probucol treatment reduced survival in CLP-LDLR-/- mice, which had elevated CE levels with a low FC/CE ratio. These results highlight that elevated FC levels with high FC/CE ratio are a risk factor for sepsis. Therefore, selectively targeting elevated FC levels and FC/CE ratio could be a promising therapeutic strategy for managing sepsis.

Statin discontinuation and new antipsychotic use after an acute hospital stay vary by hospital

Introduction

Patients are at risk for medication problems after hospital admissions, particularly those with critical illness. Medication problems include continuation of acute medications and discontinuation of chronic medications after discharge. Little is known across a national integrated health care system about the extent of these two medication problems.

Objective

To examine the extent of statin medication discontinuation and new antipsychotic medication use after hospital discharge.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Veterans Affairs healthcare system.

Participants

Veterans with an inpatient hospitalization from January 1, 2014-December 31, 2016, survived at least 180 days post-discharge, and received at least one medication through the VA outpatient pharmacy within one year around admission were included. Hospitalizations were grouped into: 1) direct admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and a diagnosis of sepsis, 2) direct admission to the ICU without sepsis diagnosis, and 3) no ICU stay during the hospitalization.

Main outcome measures

Statin medication discontinuation and new antipsychotic use at six months post-hospital discharge.

Results

A total of 520,187 participants were included in the statin medication and 910,629 in the antipsychotic medication cohorts. Statin discontinuation ranged from 10–15% and new antipsychotic prescription fills from 2–4% across the three hospitalization groups, with highest rates in the ICU admission and sepsis diagnosis group. Statin discontinuation and new antipsychotic use after a hospitalization varied by hospital, with worse performing hospitals having 11% higher odds of discontinuing a statin (median odds ratio at hospital-level, adjusted for patient differences, aMOR: 1.11 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.13)) and 29% higher odds of new antipsychotic use (aMOR, 1.29 (95% CI: 1.24, 1.34)). Risk-adjusted hospital rates of these two medication changes were not correlated (p = 0.49).

Conclusions

Systemic variation in the rates of statin medication continuation and new antipsychotic use were found.

Optimal duration for continuation of statin therapy in bacteremic patients

Background

Evidence suggests statins may improve survival in patients with bloodstream infections. However, there is no consensus on optimal timing and duration of exposure.

Objectives

To quantify statin therapy duration associated with decreased mortality in bacteremic statin users.

Methods

We conducted a case-control study using OptumClinformatics™ with matched Premier hospital data (1 October 2009-31 March 2013). Cases who died during the hospitalization were matched 1:1 to survivors on disease risk scores (DRSs). Post-admission statin therapy duration was evaluated in patients with at least 90 days of pre-admission continuous statin use. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was conducted to identify the optimal duration of statin continuation which provided the lowest inpatient mortality. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds of mortality.

Results

We included 58 DRS matched pairs of cases and controls: 47 patients (41%) continued statin therapy during the hospital admission, 15 (32%) cases and 32 (68%) controls. The CART analysis partitioned the continuation of statin therapy at ⩾2 days, representing lower mortality for patients who continued statins for 2 days or more and higher mortality for patients who did not continue or remained on statins for only 1 day. Inpatient mortality was 76% lower among those with at least 2 days of continued statin use (odds ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.55).

Conclusion

Among matched cases and controls with at least 90 days of baseline statin use prior to the admission, the continuation of statins for at least 2 days after admission demonstrated a survival benefit among bacteremic patients.

Is There Potential for Repurposing Statins as Novel Antimicrobials?

Statins are members of a class of pharmaceutical widely used to reduce high levels of serum cholesterol. In addition, statins have so-called "pleiotropic effects," which include inflammation reduction, immunomodulation, and antimicrobial effects. An increasing number of studies are emerging which detail the attenuation of bacterial growth and in vitro and in vivo virulence by statin treatment. In this review, we describe the current information available concerning the effects of statins on bacterial infections and provide insight regarding the potential use of these compounds as antimicrobial therapeutic agents.

Mechanisms and treatment of post-traumatic liver injury

Multiple organ failure is the leading cause of death in patients with severe multiple trauma in the early stage after injury. Hepatic insufficiency is common in intensive care unit (ICU), and about 27% of the patients with severe trauma suffer hepatic failure. However, the pathogenesis of traumatic liver damage is complicated due to the following main reasons: liver trauma, ischemia-reperfusion injury, severe sepsis, danger associated molecular patterns and so on. Clinically, trauma-induced liver injury can be managed conservatively or surgically, therefore, clarifying the mechanisms of traumatic liver damage, finding a new therapeutic target and improving its diagnosis and treatment are very important. This paper reviews the mechanism of post-traumatic liver injury and its diagnosis and treatment.

Continuation of Statin Therapy and Vasopressor Use in Septic Shock

Background: Studies have evaluated the use of statins in sepsis; however, no human studies have explored their effect on vasopressor requirements in septic shock. Objective: The primary objective was to determine the effect of prehospital statin continuation on duration of vasopressor therapy in patients with septic shock. Secondary objectives included maximum and average vasopressor dose and in-hospital mortality. Methods: This was a retrospective, institutional board–approved, observational cohort study in a community teaching hospital; 119 adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with an ICD-9 code for septic shock and prehospital statin therapy were evaluated. Multivariate analyses were performed to address confounders. Results: Of the 1229 patients screened, 119 (10%) met inclusion criteria; 73 patients (61%) had a statin continued within 24 hours of ICU admission. Crude analysis demonstrated no difference in vasopressor duration in the statin versus no statin group (3.3 vs 4.8 days; P = 0.21). There was no difference in either maximum (17.9 ± 16.1 vs 23.8 ± 21.7 µg/min norepinephrine equivalents [NEQs]; P = 0.1) or average vasopressor dose (9.5 ± 8.4 vs 12.1 ± 11.5 µg/min NEQ; P = 0.17). There was a decrease in mortality in the statin patients (43% vs 67 %; P = 0.05). On adjustment for potential confounders, there was no difference in any outcome, with a persistent trend toward lower mortality in the statin group. Conclusion: Continuation of prehospital statin therapy decreased neither duration nor dose of vasopressors in patients with septic shock but yielded a trend toward decreased mortality.

Impact of statins in outcomes of septic patients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The pleiotropic effects of statins have prompted considerable research in fields other than cardiovascular disease. We reviewed the literature aiming to summarize and critically evaluate the current evidence about the potential use of statins in sepsis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the Pubmed, SciELO, and Cochrane electronic databases from inception through November 1, 2013, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that examined the association between statin use (upon hospital admission or previous users) and the risk or outcome of sepsis. Data on study characteristics, measurement of statin use, and outcomes (adjusted for potential confounders) were extracted. We structured our review according to the Principles of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis criteria. Quality assessment of cohort studies was performed using the Ottawa-Newcastle Scale.

RESULTS

Twenty-three cohort studies and 5 RCTs were eligible, comprising 42 549 statin users and 54 201 non-statin users, from 1995 to 2013. The populations included varied from patients admitted to general wards or intensive care units with bacterial infections, community-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, bacteremia, or sepsis, to outpatients with chronic kidney disease or established cardiovascular disease. Overall, 16 studies reported a benefit from statin use in morbidity or mortality outcomes (range of adjusted odds ratio, 0.06-0.62; α = 0.05). The remaining 12 studies found no protective effect associated with statin use upon hospital admission or previous users. Among the 5 RCTs, none demonstrated a reduction in mortality.

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient evidence to support the use of statins in patients with sepsis, as the existing studies failed to prove a consistent mortality benefit. More clinical trials are warranted to provide more conclusive knowledge and ultimately change clinical practice.

Preoperative statin administration does not protect against early postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Statins have been shown to possess antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. In this study, we sought to determine if preoperative statin therapy is associated with a reduced frequency of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in surgical populations at increased risk of developing ARDS.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort evaluation of the association between preoperative statin therapy and early postoperative ARDS in patients undergoing elective high-risk thoracic and aortic vascular surgery. The association between preoperative statin therapy and postoperative ARDS was assessed using propensity-adjusted analyses to control for indication bias and confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of 1845 patients, 722 were receiving preoperative statin therapy. One hundred twenty patients developed postoperative ARDS. Frequencies of ARDS among those receiving statin therapy versus those who were not was 7.2% and 6.1%, respectively (OR = 1.20; 95% CI, 0.83-1.75; P = 0.330). Neither the stratified propensity score analysis (pooled OR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.60-1.43) nor matched analysis (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.48-1.27) identified a statistically significant association between preoperative statin administration and postoperative ARDS. When compared to matched controls, patients who developed postoperative ARDS did not differ in mortality (7.7% vs 8.8%, P = 0.51), hospital length of stay (21 days vs 15 days, P = 0.21), or ventilator-free days (24 days vs 25 days, P = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing high-risk surgery, preoperative statin therapy was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in postoperative ARDS. These results do not support the use of statins as prophylaxis against ARDS in patients undergoing high-risk surgery.

Do the observational studies using propensity score analysis agree with randomized controlled trials in the area of sepsis?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the intensive care unit, and many studies have been conducted aiming to improve its outcome. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies using propensity score (PS) method are commonly used for this purpose. However, the agreement between these two major methodological designs has never been investigated in this specific area. The present study aimed to compare the effect sizes between RCTs and PS-based studies.

METHODS

Electronic databases including Pubmed, Scopus, and EBSCO were searched to obtain PS-based studies in the area of sepsis. The studies were matched to RCTs or systematic reviews and meta-analysis in terms of population, intervention, control, and outcome. When there were multiple PS-based studies or RCTs in one area, the effect sizes were pooled by using random-effects model and inverse variance method. The comparisons were performed by using differences in the effect size.

RESULTS

A total of 8 topics were identified fulfilling the criterion that at least 1 pair of RCT and PS-based study could be matched. The interventions included activated protein C, low-dose steroid, antithrombin III, combination antibiotic therapy, fish oil supplementation, statin, etomidate for intubation, and recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin. The effect sizes were statistically different between RCTs and PS-based studies in most circumstances (6/8). The pooled mean difference in effect sizes was -0.16 (95% confidence interval, -0.33 to 0.01), indicating a trend towards larger treatment effect in PS studies than in RCTs. The result remains unaltered by restricting to RCTs and PS studies with the largest sample sizes.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that PS studies tend to report larger treatment effect than RCTs in the field of sepsis, indicating the difference between efficacy trials and effectiveness studies.

Effect of Concomitant 3-Hydroxy-3-Methyl-Glutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitor Therapy on Creatine Phosphokinase Levels and Mortality Among Patients Receiving Daptomycin: Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction

The prescribing information for daptomycin recommends discontinuing statin therapy during receipt of daptomycin. The literature supporting this recommendation is sparse. The objectives of this study were to examine the impact of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) on creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevations and mortality among patients receiving daptomycin therapy.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed among daptomycin recipients in the Upstate New York Veterans’ Healthcare Administration from September 15, 2003 to July 1, 2013. Inclusion criteria were: (1) daptomycin for ≥48 h, (2) availability of baseline CPK value and (3) >1 CPK level measurement taken while on therapy. The following were extracted from medical records: demographics, comorbidities, laboratory data, medication history (daptomycin, statins and concomitant drugs known to increase CPK), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-II score and vital status at 30 days. The exposure of interest was use of statins. The primary outcome was CPK elevation defined as a CPK value ≥3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) if baseline CPK was normal, and ≥5 times ULN if baseline CPK was elevated. The secondary outcome was death within 30 days of commencing daptomycin.

Results

A total of 233 patients were included in this analysis. Among these patients, 53 received concomitant statin therapy. Most baseline clinical characteristics were similar between statin recipients and non-recipients. Five (2.1%) patients experienced a CPK elevation; 3/53 (5.7%) were statin recipients and 2/180 (1.1%) received daptomycin alone (p = 0.08). All patients with CPK elevations had normal baseline CPK values. No effect modification was observed by use of other concomitant medications known to increase CPK values. Death was observed more frequently among statin non-recipients (17.2%) than recipients (9.4%).

Conclusions

Among patients receiving daptomycin, no significant difference was observed in frequency of CPK elevation between statin recipients and non-recipients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40121-014-0041-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Are there any benefits from statin treatment for the septic patient?

Statins have become the most widely used drugs for lowering cholesterol levels worldwide. At least 20% of patients requiring admission to hospital are on established statin therapy, and this proportion is growing each year. Evidence from observational studies and basic science research suggests that statins might be associated with a reduced mortality in sepsis. Randomized trials are producing equivocal results but have not shown the marked improvement in outcome suggested by the observational studies. Continued use in current statin users appears a more fruitful area for future research than statin use de novo as an adjuvant therapy in sepsis. Statin use in patients with pneumonia, acute lung injury or early sepsis warrants further study. International practice of statin use in critically ill patients is variable, and potential toxicity mandates careful monitoring. Further studies are required to address fundamental issues such as efficacy, potential target patient populations, dose, class equivalence and safety.

Lovastatin dose-dependently potentiates the pro-inflammatory activity of lipopolysaccharide both in vitro and in vivo

Since contradictory findings have been reported on potential effects of statins in modulating the inflammatory response, we have analysed the biological activity of lovastatin both in vitro using the Raw 264.7 murine macrophagic cell line and in vivo using BALB/c mice. When added to Raw 264.7 cells in combination with lipopolysaccharide, lovastatin significantly potentiated the release of interleukin-1β, interleukin-6 and interleukin-12 with respect to lipopolysaccharide alone and showed an additive effect on the release of nitric oxide. Similarly, when lovastatin was intraperitoneally administrated to BALB/c mice, it did not induce any pro-inflammatory effect when used alone, but it significantly potentiated the pro-inflammatory activity of lipopolysaccharide, in terms of number of intraperitoneal cells and serum levels of serum amyloid A, interleukin-1β, interleukin-6 and interleukin-12. A potential clinical implication of our study is that lovastatin might exert a pro-inflammatory activity in subjects affected by inflammatory processes, with clinically evident or subclinical infections.

Statin therapy is associated with reduced incidence of hypoxic hepatitis in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hypoxic hepatitis (HH) is a frequent and life-threatening complication associated with states of oxygen depletion in critically ill patients. Ischemia and reperfusion contribute to liver injury in HH. Experimental data suggest beneficial effects of statins in hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. This study was conducted to investigate whether statin treatment prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission affects incidence rates and severity of HH.

METHODS

Eight hundred fifty-one patients admitted consecutively to three medical ICUs between December 2008 and December 2009 were prospectively screened for new occurrence of HH within 48 h following ICU admission. Statin treatment prior to ICU admission was assessed. 28-day-, 90-day-, and 1-year-survival as well as new-onset of complications in HH patients were prospectively documented.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients (10%) developed HH. Statin treatment prior to ICU admission was significantly associated with decreased incidence of HH within 48 h after ICU admission in the multivariate analysis (adjusted OR=0.42 (95% CI 0.19-0.95); p<0.05). Cardiogenic shock (p<0.001), septic shock (p<0.001) and active alcohol consumption (p<0.01) were identified as independent risk factors for development of HH. 28-day-, 90-day-, and 1-year-mortality rates in HH were 58%, 67%, and 74%, respectively. Statins were associated with improved 28-day-survival in the total study cohort (p<0.05), but did not affect 90-day- and 1-year-mortality, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiogenic shock, septic shock, and active alcohol consumption were independent factors predisposing patients to new onset of HH. Statin treatment prior to ICU admission was the only protective factor regarding the new occurrence of HH in critically ill patients.

Statins role in the prevention and treatment of sepsis

Sepsis is a complex disease with typically poor outcomes. While the onset of sepsis is typically infectious, the detrimental consequences follow pathogen toxin release that produces activation of numerous cytokines and a pro-inflammatory response. These same cytokines also stimulate activation of coagulation and inhibit natural fibrinolysis. Despite decades of research targeted against these pathways the development of sepsis and mortality in patients with sepsis remains high. While statins were developed for reducing cholesterol in patients with atherosclerotic disease, we now know they have a number of other properties which may be helpful in the prevention and treatment of sepsis. Statins have demonstrated the ability to reduce a number of pro-inflammatory cytokines known to be detrimental in the development and progression of sepsis. Statins have also demonstrated the ability to limit the coagulation response and promote fibrinolysis in the setting of sepsis. Based on these encouraging pharmacologic properties of statins a number of trials have been conducted evaluating the impact of statins on the prevention and treatment of sepsis. Most of the trials to date have been retrospective cohort trials, with very few prospective randomized trials. While some trials fail to demonstrate a benefit of statins, most trials suggest a reduction in the development of sepsis and/or other important sepsis related outcomes. While the laboratory and early clinical experience with statins are encouraging, randomized controlled trials will be need to fully define the role of statins in the prevention and treatment of sepsis.

HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors for Prevention and Treatment of Severe Sepsis

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, or statins, are among the most commonly prescribed pharmaceuticals in the world, especially among the elderly. The remarkable conjuncture of this fact with the rising incidence of severe sepsis among people over age 65 could prove to be of serendipitous benefit, because numerous actions of the statins make them of potential use in the prevention and treatment of severe sepsis. Severe sepsis continues to be a highly lethal condition, for which there are, as yet, no effective pharmacological treatments, save antibiotics. We explore the biological plausibility of statins as prophylaxis agents and as treatment for severe sepsis and thoroughly review the preclinical and clinical studies that have explored the effects of statins in infected and septic patients. Statins remain only promising treatments for severe sepsis, without convincing evidence that they reduce patient mortality. Ongoing randomized trials may provide conclusive evidence, whether positive or negative.

[Cardioprotection]

The demographic change is associated with an increasing number of elderly patients with serious comorbidities. The prevalence of coronary heart disease in particular increases with age and raises the risk of perioperative myocardial ischemia. In the last few years various interventions have been evaluated to lower the perioperative risk for serious cardiovascular events. This includes cardioprotective medical interventions, for example with β-receptor blockers and statins. Current guidelines recommend that patients who are on β-receptor blockers or statins for chronic treatment of cardiovascular diseases should continue this medication throughout the perioperative period. Myocardial conditioning has been assessed to be effective under numerous experimental conditions and clinical trials have also provided evidence for myocardial protection by conditioning. Besides ischemic and anesthetic-induced preconditioning the noninvasive technique of remote preconditioning offers interesting possibilities, especially for patients with serious comorbidities; however, large scale randomized clinical multicentre trials are still needed. Regarding cardioprotective effectiveness, the clinical data for regional anesthesia are very heterogeneous; nevertheless regional anesthesia is very effective in postoperative pain therapy. Therefore regional anesthesia should be used as a part of multimodal therapy concepts to lower the risk of perioperative cardiovascular events.