On the utility of the trail making test in migraine with and without aura: a meta-analysis

Efficacy of a dual task protocol on neurophysiological and clinical outcomes in migraine: a randomized control trial

The main aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a dual task protocol in people with episodic migraine with respect to both active exercises only and cognitive task only treatments, concerning some neurophysiological and clinical outcomes. A randomized control trial was adopted in people with episodic migraine without aura. Some neurophysiological and clinical outcomes were collected (t0): resting motor threshold (rMT), short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (ICF), pressure pain threshold (PPT), trail making test (TMT), frontal assessment battery (FAB), headache-related disability (MIDAS) and headache parameters. Then, participants were randomized into three groups: active exercise only (n = 10), cognitive task only (n = 10) and dual task protocol (n = 10). After 3 months of each treatment and after 1-month follow-up the same neurophysiological and clinical outcomes were revaluated. A significant time x group effect was only found for the trapezius muscle (p = 0.012, pη2 = 0.210), suggesting that PPT increased significantly only in active exercise and dual task protocol groups. A significant time effect was found for rMT (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.473), MIDAS (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.426), TMT (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.338) and FAB (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.462). A repeated measures ANOVA for SICI at 3 ms highlighted a statistically significant time effect for the dual task group (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.629), but not for the active exercises group (p = 0.565, pη2 = 0.061), and for the cognitive training (p = 0.357, pη2 = 0.108). The dual task protocol seems to have a more evident effect on both habituation and sensitization outcomes than the two monotherapies taken alone in people with migraine.

Neurophysiological and Clinical Outcomes in Episodic Migraine Without Aura: A Cross-Sectional Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess differences between people with episodic migraine and healthy controls in some neurophysiological and clinical outcomes, which, in turn, may highlight the differences in sensory processing, especially in cortical excitability, pain processing, and executive function.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed, including the following outcomes: pressure pain thresholds with algometry; resting motor threshold, short-interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation with transcranial magnetic stimulation; and executive functions with the trail making test and the frontal assessment battery.

RESULTS

Thirty adults with migraine (36 ± 10 years) and 30 healthy controls (29 ± 14 years) were included in this study. Compared with the healthy controls, participants with migraine presented lower pressure pain thresholds values in all the assessed muscles ( P < 0.001), lower resting motor threshold (-10.5% of the stimulator output, 95% CI: -16.8 to -4.2, P = 0.001, Cohen d = 0.869) and higher short-interval intracortical inhibition motor-evoked potential's amplitude at 3 ms (0.25, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.46, P = 0.015, Cohen d = 0.662), and worse performances both in trail making test (7.1, 95% CI: 0.9 to 13.4, P = 0.027, Cohen d = 0.594) and frontal assessment battery (-1.1, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.5, P = 0.001, Cohen d = 0.915).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with migraine presented significant differences in cortical excitability, executive functions, and pressure pain thresholds, compared with healthy controls.

Neuropsychological Function in Migraine Headaches: An Expanded Comprehensive Multidomain Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A sizable literature has studied neuropsychologic function in persons with migraine (PwM), but despite this, few quantitative syntheses exist. These focused on circumscribed areas of the literature. In this study, we conducted an expanded comprehensive meta-analysis comparing performance on clinical measures of neuropsychological function both within and across domains, between samples of PwM and healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

For this Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-compliant meta-analysis, a unified search strategy was applied to OneSearch (a comprehensive collection of electronic databases) to identify peer-reviewed original research published across all years up until August 1, 2023. Using random-effects modeling, we examined aggregated effect sizes (Hedges' g), between-study heterogeneity (Cochran Q and I2), moderating variables (meta-regression and subgroup analyses), and publication bias (Egger regression intercept and Duval and Tweedie Trim-and-Fill procedure). Study bias was also coded using the NIH Study Quality Assessment Tools.

RESULTS

Omnibus meta-analysis from the 58 studies included (PwM n = 5,452, HC n = 16,647; 612 effect sizes extracted) indicated lower overall cognitive performance in PwM vs HCs (g = -0.37; 95% CI -0.47 to -0.28; p < 0.001), and high between-study heterogeneity (Q = 311.25, I2 = 81.69). Significant domain-specific negative effects were observed in global cognition (g = -0.46, p < 0.001), executive function (g = -0.45, p < 0.001), processing speed (g = -0.42, p < 0.001), visuospatial/construction (g = -0.39, p = 0.006), simple/complex attention (g = -0.38, p < 0.001), learning/memory (g = -0.25, p < 0.001), and language (g = -0.24, p < 0.001). Orientation (p = 0.146), motor (p = 0.102), and intelligence (p = 0.899) were not significant. Moderator analyses indicated that age (particularly younger HCs), samples drawn from health care facility settings (e.g., tertiary headache centers) vs community-based populations, and higher attack duration were associated with larger (negative) effects and accounted for a significant proportion of between-study heterogeneity in effects. Notably, PwM without aura yielded stronger (negative) effects (omnibus g = -0.37) vs those with aura (omnibus g = -0.10), though aura status did not account for heterogeneity observed between studies.

DISCUSSION

Relative to HCs, PwM demonstrate worse neurocognition, as detected by neuropsychological tests, especially on cognitive screeners and tests within executive functioning and processing speed domains. Effects were generally small to moderate in magnitude and evident only in clinic (vs community) samples. Aura was not meaningfully associated with neurocognitive impairment.

Visual Processing During the Interictal Period Between Migraines: A Meta-Analysis

Migraine is a poorly understood neurological disorder and a leading cause of disability in young adults, particularly women. Migraines are characterized by recurring episodes of severe pulsating unilateral headache and usually visual symptoms. Currently there is some disagreement in the electrophysiological literature regarding the universality of all migraineurs exhibiting physiological visual impairments also during interictal periods (i.e., the symptom free period between migraines). Thus, this meta-analysis investigated the evidence for altered visual function as measured electrophysiologically via pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitudes and habituation in adult migraineurs with or without visual aura and controls in the interictal period. Twenty-three studies were selected for random effects meta-analysis which demonstrated slightly diminished VEP amplitudes in the early fast conducting P100 component but not in N135, and substantially reduced habituation in the P100 and the N135 in migraineurs with and without visual aura symptoms compared to controls. No statistical differences were found between migraineurs with and without aura, possibly due to inadequate studies. Overall, insufficient published data and substantial heterogeneity between studies was observed for all latency components of pattern-reversal VEP, highlighting the need for further electrophysiological experimentation and more targeted temporal analysis of visual function, in episodic migraineurs.

Assessing attentional task-related electroencephalogram signal variations by using mobile electroencephalogram technology: An experimental study

BACKGROUND

A better understanding of the network responses of cortical activities during rest and cognitive tasks is necessary. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate cerebral activities during attentional tasks by using mobile electroencephalography, identifying the types of attentional components and brain waves.

METHODS

In this experimental study, we enrolled 12 healthy young adults. The attentional tasks comprised parts A and B of the Trail-Making Test (TMT). Nineteen electroencephalography electrodes were placed over various brain regions. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to examine the differences in power levels between the rest and TMT conditions.

RESULTS

During TMT part A, the electroencephalography power level of the delta waves was significantly higher in the right frontal, left central, left occipital, left inferior frontal, right mid-temporal, right posterior temporal, and middle parietal areas (P < .05) than those during the resting state; that of the alpha waves was significantly lower in the left posterior temporal area (P = .006); and that of the high gamma waves was significantly lower in the left parietal (P = .05) and left occipital (P = .002) areas. During TMT part B, the electroencephalography power level of the beta waves was significantly higher in the right frontal area (P = .041) than that during the resting state, and that of the low gamma waves was significantly higher in the left frontal pole, right frontal, and right inferior frontal areas (P < .05). During the focused attentional task, the power level of the delta waves increased and that of the alpha waves decreased, and during the alternating attentional task, those of both the beta and gamma waves increased. The delta waves were related to the whole brain, the alpha and high gamma waves to the left posterior lobe, and the beta and low gamma waves to both frontal lobes.

CONCLUSION

These findings contribute to the basic knowledge necessary to develop new attentional assessment methods for clinical situations.

Comparing conventional treatment, single-target rTMS, or dual-target rTMS for the treatment of post-stroke cognitive impairment - clinical effects and neuroscientific insights: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although increasing evidence suggests that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may help improve cognitive impairment after stroke, its clinical efficacy is still limited. This limitation may be due to the fact that the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is only one of several brain areas involved in post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). The aim of the present study is to reveal whether dual-target stimulation is superior to single-target stimulation and usual care in the treatment of PSCI.

METHODS

A single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial will be conducted, and fifty-seven PSCI patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of three groups based on the stimulating site. The primary outcome is cognitive function, measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Beijing Version (MoCA-BJ) and Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE). The secondary outcomes are the modified Barthel Index (MBI), Trail-Making Test (TMT), and digital span test (DST). Furthermore, changes in brain activity are assessed using transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) examination and serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) closely related to nerve and vascular repair after brain injury. All outcomes will be measured at baseline and 4 weeks after treatment.

DISCUSSION

If dual-target rTMS in significant improvements in cognitive function, this method could be considered as a first-line clinical treatment for PSCI. This proposed study has the potential to identify a new, evidence-based intervention that can enhance cognition and independent living in patients with cognitive impairment after stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200066184 . It was registered on 26 November 2022.

Burnout is related to executive dysfunction in primary healthcare professionals working in rural areas

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare professionals are especially vulnerable to burnout, which implies a hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal dysregulation that could impact the integrity of brain structures needed for cognitive processing. However, a scarce number of studies have analyzed the relationship between burnout and executive functions in this population, and possible modulator factors have not been clarified. This study aims to characterize the burnout level of primary healthcare professionals working in rural areas, and to analyze its relationship with executive functioning, considering the possible modulating role of optimism.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 32 primary healthcare professionals were recruited from the Carcastillo Health Center (Spain) and underwent an assessment in which burnout was assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey. Optimism and executive functions were also evaluated.

RESULTS

43.8%, 59.4%, and 56.3% of participants experienced high levels of burnout via emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. The path analysis showed that emotional exhaustion was associated with poorer Trail Making Test scores (ß = -0.37, SE = 0.17, p = 0.024, Cohen's f2 = 0.15), but optimism was not a significant moderator of this relationship (p = 0.24). The proposed model yielded excellent fit (CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.0001, SRMR = 0.0001, and ?2(3) = 6.07, p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that burnout in healthcare professionals could have a detrimental effect on the efficiency of health systems. This has relevant implications, especially for professionals characterized by both work pressure and high cognitive demands, and highlights a need to implement occupation-specific approaches for prevention.

The optimum parameters and neuroimaging mechanism of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to post-stroke cognitive impairment, a protocol of an orthogonally-designed randomized controlled trial

Objective

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) has been used in cognition impairment due to various neuropsychiatric disorders. However, its optimum parameters and the neuroimaging mechanism are still of uncertainty. In order to simulate a study setting as close to real world as possible, the present study introduces a new orthogonally-designed protocol, consisting of the rTMS intervention with four key parameters (stimulating site, frequency, intensity and pulse number) and three different levels in each one, and aims to investigate the optimum parameters and the brain activity and connectivity in default mode network (DMN), dorsal attention network (DAN), central executive network (CEN) following rTMS intervention to post-stroke cognition impairment (PSCI).

Methods

A single-center, orthogonally-designed, triple-blind randomized controlled trial will be conducted and forty-five PSCI patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of nine active rTMS groups based on four rTMS paraments: stimulating site, frequency, intensity and pulse number. Neuropsychological, activities of daily living, quality of life and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) evaluations were be performed pre-, post- and 3 months after rTMS.

Discussion

This study evaluates the optimum parameters of rTMS for patients with post-stroke cognition impairment and explores the alteration of neural function in DMN, DAN, CEN brain network. These results would facilitate the standardized application of rTMS in cognition impairment rehabilitation.

Attention Impairment During the Interictal State in Migraineurs without Aura: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background and Purpose

Migraine suffering is more than the onset of head pain. The broad non-painful clinical symptoms associated with migraine are not well recognized. Recent researches support that migraineurs suffer attention deficits, but these findings are not conclusive. The purpose of our study was to assess whether patients with migraine without aura (MwoA) during the interictal period have attention impairment and to identify the migraine characteristics related to attention deficits.

Methods

We enrolled subjects with MwoA during the interictal period and healthy controls matched for age, gender, and education level in this cross-sectional study. The attention network test (ANT) and a battery of neuropsychological tests, including the trail-making test (TMT), the digit span test (DST), and the Stroop test, were administered to the participants during the headache-free period.

Results

Forty-four subjects with MwoA (4 males, 40 females) and 20 controls matched for age, gender, and literacy education were included. Patients in MwoA were more anxious (P = 0.007) and depressed (P = 0.001) than healthy subjects. Significant differences between the two groups were detected in the executive network (P = 0.006) but not in the alerting and orienting networks of ANT. Mean reaction time of ANT in the MwoA group was significantly longer than that in the control group (P = 0.028). Patients showed worse performance on DST-forward (P < 0.001), DST-backward (P < 0.001), DS Total (P < 0.001), TMT-A (P < 0.001), TMT-B (P < 0.001) and TMT-d (P = 0.002). Differences found in executive functions between the two groups were unrelated to gender, age, literacy, anxiety, and depression. Multiple regression analysis revealed no relation between clinical characteristics of headache and scores on the executive function with MwoA.

Conclusion

Our study suggested that patients in MwoA present worse performances on the executive control of attention networks during the headache-free period, which appear not be associated with measures of migraine severity. Although more studies are needed in this area, our results could be useful to find specific neuropsychological biomarker for migraine pathophysiology.

Association between Childhood Allergic Diseases and Headache

Allergic disorders and headache are both common in pediatric populations. Chronic allergic disorders may affect sleep leading to chronic daily headaches. Poor controlled allergies may cause neurogenic inflammation that may be a predisposing factor to migraine headaches. We hypothesized that a higher prevalence of headaches may be found in children with allergy compared with those without allergy. Patients with either multiple allergic disorders or with poorly controlled allergic symptoms may be associated with headaches, especially migraine headaches. This study aimed to examine (1) the prevalence of headache in allergic children and (2) the association between allergic diseases and headache. Patients with allergic diseases and nonallergic children as control were recruited in the pediatric outpatient clinic of Naresuan University Hospital between January 2017 and January 2018. A neurological examination was performed by a pediatric neurologist. The questionnaire consisted of the pediatric headache symptom checklist and the items for evaluation of allergy control status. The diagnosis and classification of headache were based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 criteria. The results were analyzed using the Student's t-test, chi-squared tests, odds ratios, and 95% confidence interval. One hundred fifty-five subjects were enrolled in our study, of which 85 subjects (54.8%) were diagnosed with allergic diseases. The allergic group had a significantly higher prevalence of headache than the control group (37 [43.5%] vs. 19 [27.1%], p = 0.035). The allergic group also had a significantly higher prevalence of migraine and probable migraine headache than the control group (23 [27.06%] vs. 7 [10%], p = 0.007). The prevalence of headache did not increase in subjects who had more than one allergic disease. There was no association between the control of allergy and headache. The present study showed that allergic diseases were associated with increased prevalence of headache and migraine in children. However, the control of allergic symptoms and the number of allergic diseases were not associated with headache. The physicians should be aware of headache in allergic patients and give appropriate treatment. Further study would be to identify specific biomarkers for the development of better treatment in these comorbid diseases.