1
|
Wen H, Huo G, Qin C, Wu H, Wang D, Dan M, Geng X, Liu S. Safety evaluation of PEGylated MNPs and p-PEGylated MNPs in SD rats. Sci Rep 2023; 13:21501. [PMID: 38057444 PMCID: PMC10700491 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48742-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Polyethylene glycol-coated magnetic nanoparticles (PEGylated MNPs) have demonstrated prominent advantages in cancer diagnosis and hyperthermia therapy. However, there is currently lack of standard mode and sufficient toxicity data for determining the delayed risk of PEGylated MNPs. Nevertheless, the toxicity potentials, especially those associated with the oxidative stress, were ubiquitously reported. In this study, PEGylated MNPs and p-PEGylated MNPs were administrated to SD (Sprague Dawley) rats by single intravenously injection, and various toxicity indicators were monitored till 56 days post-administration for a comprehensive toxicity evaluation. We revealed that both nanoparticles could be rapidly cleared from plasma and enter tissues, such as, liver, kidneys and spleen, and p-PEGylated MNP is less prone to be accumulated in the tissues, indicating a lower toxicity risk. PEGylated MNPs were more likely to up-regulate the expression levels of Th2 type cytokines and trigger inflammatory pathways, but no related pathological change was found. Both MNPs are not mutagenic, while recoverable mild DNA damage associated with the presence of nanoparticles might also be observed. This study demonstrated a research approach for the non-clinical safety evaluation of nanoparticles. It also provided comprehensive valuable safety data for PEGylated and p-PEGylated MNPs, for promoting the clinical application and bio-medical translation of such MNPs with PEG modifications in the cancer diagnosis and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hairuo Wen
- National Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, Key Laboratory of Beijing for Nonclinical Safety Evaluation Research of Drugs, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 100176, People's Republic of China
| | - Guitao Huo
- National Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, Key Laboratory of Beijing for Nonclinical Safety Evaluation Research of Drugs, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 100176, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao Qin
- National Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, Key Laboratory of Beijing for Nonclinical Safety Evaluation Research of Drugs, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 100176, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Wu
- National Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, Key Laboratory of Beijing for Nonclinical Safety Evaluation Research of Drugs, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 100176, People's Republic of China
- China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Dan Wang
- National Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, Key Laboratory of Beijing for Nonclinical Safety Evaluation Research of Drugs, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 100176, People's Republic of China
- China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Mo Dan
- National Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, Key Laboratory of Beijing for Nonclinical Safety Evaluation Research of Drugs, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 100176, People's Republic of China.
- State Key Laboratory of Novel Pharmaceutical Preparations and Excipients, CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang, 050035, Hebei, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xingchao Geng
- National Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, Key Laboratory of Beijing for Nonclinical Safety Evaluation Research of Drugs, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 100176, People's Republic of China.
| | - Shujie Liu
- National Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, Key Laboratory of Beijing for Nonclinical Safety Evaluation Research of Drugs, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 100176, People's Republic of China.
- Center for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, 100022, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wei T, Zhang T, Tang M. An overview of quantum dots-induced immunotoxicity and the underlying mechanisms. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2022; 311:119865. [PMID: 35944776 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Quantum dots (QDs) have bright luminescence and excellent photostability. New synthesis techniques and strategies also enhance QDs properties for specific applications. With the continuous expansion of the applications, QDs-mediated immunotoxicity has become a major concern. The immune system has been confirmed to be an important target organ of QDs and is sensitive to QDs. Herein, review immunotoxic effects caused by QDs and the underlying mechanisms. Firstly, QDs exposure-induced modulation in immune cell maturation and differentiation is summarized, especially pre-exposed dendritic cells (DCs) and their regulatory roles in adaptive immunity. Cytokines are usually recognized as biomarkers of immunotoxicity, therefore, variation of cytokines mediated by QDs is also highlighted. Moreover, the activation of the complement system induced by QDs is discussed. Accumulated results have suggested that QDs disrupt the immune response by regulating intracellular oxidative stress (reactive oxygen species) levels, autophagy formation, and expressions of pro-inflammatory mediators. Furthermore, several signalling pathways play a key role in the disruption. Finally, some difficulties worthy of further consideration are proposed. Because there are still challenges in biomedical and clinical applications, this review hopes to provide information that could be useful in exploring the mechanisms associated with QD-induced immunotoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Wei
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Department of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ting Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Department of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Meng Tang
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Department of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
In vitro review of nanoparticles attacking macrophages: Interaction and cell death. Life Sci 2022; 307:120840. [PMID: 35905812 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, the wide application of nanoparticles (NPs) inevitably leads to environmental pollution and human exposure, and its safety has attracted more and more attention. Since macrophages are the cells most directly exposed to multi-pathway invading NPs in the body, it is necessary to assess of toxic effects of NPs in macrophages, clarify the potential mechanisms of NPs toxicity to improve our understanding about the interaction of NPs with macrophages in vivo, and avoid body damage. Currently, studies on the toxicity of NPs to macrophages are rare and mainly focused on in vitro, so this paper integrated the toxic effect of macrophages exposed to NPs and the macrophages cellular changes following the interaction with NPs, including NPs internalization, ROS production, cytokines alterations, DNA damage and cell death, and further explored the involved mechanisms. This review aims to provide some insights into the further toxicological studies of NPs.
Collapse
|
4
|
Liang Y, Zhang T, Tang M. Toxicity of quantum dots on target organs and immune system. J Appl Toxicol 2021; 42:17-40. [PMID: 33973249 DOI: 10.1002/jat.4180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Quantum dots (QDs), due to their superior luminous properties, have been proven to be a very promising biological probe, which can be used as a candidate material for clinical applications. The toxicity of QDs in the environment and biological systems has caused widespread concern in the nanosphere, but their immune toxicity and their impact on the immune system are still relatively unknown. At present, the research on the toxicity of QDs is mainly focused on in vitro models, but few have systematically evaluated their adverse effects on target organs. Animal studies have shown that QDs can be accumulated in various organs due to their main exposure routes, thereby posing a potential threat to major organs. This review briefly describes general characteristics and the wide medical applications of QDs and focuses on the adverse effects of QDs on major target organs, such as liver, lung, kidney, brain, and spleen, after acute and chronic exposure. QDs mainly cause changes in the corresponding indicators of target organs, such as oxidative damage, and in severe cases cause hyperemia, tissue necrosis, and even death. In addition to causing direct damage to target organs, QDs can also cause a large number of immune cells to accumulate and cause inflammatory reactions when causing damage to other major organs. Whether it is to avoid the risk of people contacting QDs in production and life, or to realize the clinical applications of QDs, is very essential to conduct systematic in vivo toxicity assessment of QDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Liang
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine & Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Meng Tang
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine & Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu N, Tang M. Toxicity of different types of quantum dots to mammalian cells in vitro: An update review. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2020; 399:122606. [PMID: 32516645 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Currently, there are a great quantity type of quantum dots (QDs) that has been developed by researchers. Depending on the core material, they can be roughly divided into cadmium, silver, indium, carbon and silicon QDs. And studies on the toxicity of QDs are also increasing rapidly, but in vivo tests in model animals fail to reach a consistent conclusion. Therefore, we review the literatures dealing with the cytotoxicity of QDs in mammalian cells in vitro. After a short summary of the application characteristics of five types of QDs, the fate of QDs in cells will be discussed, ranging from the uptake, transportation, sublocation and excretion. A substantial part of the review will be focused on in vitro toxicity, in which the type of QDs is combined with their adverse effect and toxic mechanism. Because of their different luminescent properties, different subcellular fate, and different degree of cytotoxicity, we provide an overview on the balance of optical stability and biocompatibility of QDs and give a short outlook on future direction of cytotoxicology of QDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Liu
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine & Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao, Nanjing 210009, PR China.
| | - Meng Tang
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine & Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao, Nanjing 210009, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang Y, Tang M. Review of in vitro toxicological research of quantum dot and potentially involved mechanisms. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2018; 625:940-962. [PMID: 29996464 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2017] [Revised: 12/28/2017] [Accepted: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Quantum dots (QDs) are one of emerging engineering nanomaterials (NMs) with advantageous properties which can act as candidates for clinical imaging and diagnosis. Nevertheless, toxicological studies have proved that QDs for better or worse pose threats to diverse systems which are attributed to the release of metal ion and specific characteristics of nanoparticles (NPs), hampering the wide use of QDs to biomedical area. It has been postulated that mechanisms of toxicity evoked by QDs have implications in oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species (ROS), inflammation and release of metal ion. Meanwhile, DNA damage and disturbance of subcellular structures would occur during QDs treatment. This review is intended to conclude the cytotoxicity of QDs in multiple systems, as well as the potential mechanisms on the basis of recent literatures. Finally, toxicity-related factors are clarified, among which chirality seems to be a newly proposed influence factor that determines the destiny of cells in response to QDs. However, details of interaction between QDs and cells have not been well elucidated. Given that molecular mechanisms of QDs-induced toxicity are still not clearly elucidated, further research should be required for this meaningful topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Wang
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China
| | - Meng Tang
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang Y, Tang M. Dysfunction of various organelles provokes multiple cell death after quantum dot exposure. Int J Nanomedicine 2018; 13:2729-2742. [PMID: 29765216 PMCID: PMC5944465 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s157135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Quantum dots (QDs) are different from the materials with the micrometer scale. Owing to the superiority in fluorescence and optical stability, QDs act as possible diagnostic and therapeutic tools for application in biomedical field. However, potential threats of QDs to human health hamper their wide utilization in life sciences. It has been reported that oxidative stress and inflammation are involved in toxicity caused by QDs. Recently, accumulating research unveiled that disturbance of subcellular structures plays a magnificent role in cytotoxicity of QDs. Diverse organelles would collapse during QD treatment, including DNA damage, endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and lysosomal rupture. Different forms of cellular end points on the basis of recent research have been concluded. Apart from apoptosis and autophagy, a new form of cell death termed pyroptosis, which is finely orchestrated by inflammasome complex and gasdermin family with secretion of interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-18, was also summarized. Finally, several potential cellular signaling pathways were also listed. Activation of Toll-like receptor-4/myeloid differentiation primary response 88, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells and NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 inflammasome pathways by QD exposure is associated with regulation of cellular processes. With the development of QDs, toxicity evaluation is far behind its development, where specific mechanisms of toxic effects are not clearly defined. Further studies concerned with this promising area are urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Wang
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Meng Tang
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|