Outcomes of rapid response team implementation in tertiary private hospitals: a prospective cohort study

Characteristics and outcomes of patients screened by the rapid response team and transferred to intensive care unit in South Korea

The rapid response system (RRS) is associated with a reduction in in-hospital mortality. This study aimed to determine the characteristics and outcomes of patients transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) by a rapid response team (RRT). This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included patients from nine hospitals in South Korea. Adult patients who were admitted to the general ward (GW) and required RRS activation were included. Patients with do-not-resuscitate orders and without lactate level or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were excluded. A total of 8228 patients were enrolled, 3379 were transferred to the ICU. The most common reasons for RRT activation were respiratory distress, sepsis and septic shock. The number of patients who underwent interventions, the length of hospital stays, 28-day mortality, and in-hospital mortality were higher in the ICU group than in the GW group. Factors that could affect both 28-day and in-hospital mortality included the severity score, low PaO2/FiO2 ratio, higher lactate and C-reactive protein levels, and hospitalization time prior to RRT activation. Patients admitted to the ICU after RRT activation generally face more challenging clinical situations, which may affect their survival outcomes.

Effectiveness of Rapid Response Team implementation in a tertiary hospital in Egypt: an interventional study

BACKGROUND

Rapid response teams (RRTs) help in the early recognition of deteriorating patients in hospital wards and provide the needed management at the bedside by a qualified team. RRT implementation is still questionable because there is insufficient evidence regarding its effects. To date, according to our knowledge, no published studies have addressed the effectiveness of RRT implementation on inpatient care outcomes in Egypt.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the impact of an RRT on the rates of inpatient mortality, cardiopulmonary arrest calls and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in an Egyptian tertiary hospital.

METHODS

An interventional study was conducted at a university hospital. Data was evaluated for 24 months before the intervention (January 2018 till December 2019, which included 4242 admissions). The intervention was implemented for 12 months (January 2021 till December 2021), ending with postintervention evaluation of 2338 admissions.

RESULTS

RRT implementation was associated with a significant reduction in inpatient mortality rate from 88.93 to 46.44 deaths per 1000 discharges (relative risk reduction (RRR)=0.48; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.58). Inpatient cardiopulmonary arrest rate decreased from 7.41 to 1.77 calls per 1000 discharges (RRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.92), while unplanned ICU admissions decreased from 5.98 to 4.87 per 1000 discharges (RRR, 0.19; 95% CI, -0.65 to 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

RRT implementation was associated with a significantly reduced hospital inpatient mortality rate, cardiopulmonary arrest call rate as well as reduced unplanned ICU admission rate. Our results reveal that RRT can contribute to improving the quality of care in similar settings in developing countries.

Rapid Response Systems

The hospital rapid response system (RRS) is a patient safety and quality intervention that responds quickly to clinical deteriorations on general wards with the goal of preventing cardiopulmonary arrests, reducing hospital mortality, and facilitating triage and level of care escalations. The RRS is one of the first organized, and systematic, elements of the "ICU without walls" model. RRSs have been shown to be effective in preventing deterioration to cardiopulmonary arrest on general hospital wards and reducing total and unexpected hospital mortality. Recent studies have demonstrated that this benefit can be enhanced through targeted improvements and modifications of existing RRSs.

Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Recognizing and Responding to Clinical Deterioration Outside the ICU: 2023

RATIONALE

Clinical deterioration of patients hospitalized outside the ICU is a source of potentially reversible morbidity and mortality. To address this, some acute care hospitals have implemented systems aimed at detecting and responding to such patients.

OBJECTIVES

To provide evidence-based recommendations for hospital clinicians and administrators to optimize recognition and response to clinical deterioration in non-ICU patients.

PANEL DESIGN

The 25-member panel included representatives from medicine, nursing, respiratory therapy, pharmacy, patient/family partners, and clinician-methodologists with expertise in developing evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

METHODS

We generated actionable questions using the Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes (PICO) format and performed a systematic review of the literature to identify and synthesize the best available evidence. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach to determine certainty in the evidence and to formulate recommendations and good practice statements (GPSs).

RESULTS

The panel issued 10 statements on recognizing and responding to non-ICU patients with critical illness. Healthcare personnel and institutions should ensure that all vital sign acquisition is timely and accurate (GPS). We make no recommendation on the use of continuous vital sign monitoring among unselected patients. We suggest focused education for bedside clinicians in signs of clinical deterioration, and we also suggest that patient/family/care partners' concerns be included in decisions to obtain additional opinions and help (both conditional recommendations). We recommend hospital-wide deployment of a rapid response team or medical emergency team (RRT/MET) with explicit activation criteria (strong recommendation). We make no recommendation about RRT/MET professional composition or inclusion of palliative care members on the responding team but suggest that the skill set of responders should include eliciting patients' goals of care (conditional recommendation). Finally, quality improvement processes should be part of a rapid response system.

CONCLUSIONS

The panel provided guidance to inform clinicians and administrators on effective processes to improve the care of patients at-risk for developing critical illness outside the ICU.

Effects of a Rapid Response Team on Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread adoption of the rapid response team (RRT) by many hospitals, questions remain regarding their effectiveness in improving several aspects of patient outcomes, such as hospital mortality, cardiopulmonary arrests, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and length of stay (LOS).

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review to understand the rapid response team's (RRT) effect on patient outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and two trial registers. The studies published up to May 6, 2022, from the inception date of the databases were included. Two researchers filtered the title, abstract and full text. The Version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool were used separately for randomized and non-randomized controlled trials for quality appraisal.

RESULTS

Sixty-one eligible studies were identified, four randomized controlled trials(RCTs), four non-randomized controlled trials, six interrupted time-series(ITS) design , and 47 pretest-posttest studies. A total of 52 studies reported hospital mortality, 51 studies reported cardiopulmonary arrests, 18 studies reported unplanned ICU admissions and ten studies reported LOS.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review found the variation in context and the type of RRT interventions restricts direct comparisons. The evidence for improving several aspects of patient outcomes was inconsistent, with most studies demonstrating that RRT positively impacts patient outcomes.

Improving Situational Awareness to Decrease Emergency ICU Transfers for Hospitalized Pediatric Cardiology Patients

Introduction

Failure to recognize and mitigate critical patient deterioration remains a source of serious preventable harm to hospitalized pediatric cardiac patients. Emergency transfers (ETs) occur 10-20 times more often than code events outside the intensive care unit (ICU) and are associated with morbidity and mortality. This quality improvement project aimed to increase days between ETs and code events on an acute care cardiology unit (ACCU) from a baseline median of 17 and 32 days to ≥70 and 90 days within 12 months.

Methods

Institutional leaders, cardiology-trained physicians and nurses, and trainees convened, utilizing the Institution for Healthcare Improvement model to achieve the project aims. Interventions implemented focused on improving situational awareness (SA), including a "Must Call List," evening rounds, a visual management board, and daily huddles. Outcome measures included calendar days between ETs and code events in the ACCU. Process measures tracked the utilization of interventions, and cardiac ICU length of stay was a balancing measure. Statistical process control chart methodology was utilized to analyze the impact of interventions.

Results

Within the study period, we observed a centerline shift in primary outcome measures with an increase from 17 to 56 days between ETs and 32 to 62 days between code events in the ACCU, with sustained improvement. Intervention utilization ranged from 87% to 100%, and there was no observed special cause variation in our balancing measure.

Conclusions

Interventions focused on improving SA in a particularly vulnerable patient population led to sustained improvement with reduced ETs and code events outside the ICU.

Implementing a Rapid Response Team: A Quality Improvement Project in a Low- to Middle-Income Country

BACKGROUND

The benefits of rapid response teams (RRTs) have been controversial with few studies conducted in low- to middle-income countries.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of implementing an RRT on 4 patient outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a quality improvement pre-and-post design using the Plan-Do-Study-Act model in a tertiary hospital in a low- to middle-income country. We collected data before and after implementing the RRT in 4 phases and over 4 years.

RESULTS

Survival to discharge after cardiac arrest was 25.0% per 1000 discharges in 2016 and increased to 50% in 2019, a 50% increase. The rate of activations per 1000 discharges was 20.45% for the code team in 2016 and 33.6% for the RRT team in 2019. Thirty-one patients who arrested were transferred to a critical care unit before implementing the RRT, and 33% of such patients were transferred after. The time it took the code team to arrive at the bedside was 3.1 minutes in 2016 and decreased to 1.7 minutes for the RRT team to arrive in 2019, a 46% decrease.

DISCUSSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Implementing an RTT led by nurses in a low- to middle-income country increased the survival rate of patients who had a cardiac arrest by 50%. The role of nurses in improving patient outcomes and saving lives is substantial and empowers nurses to call for assistance to save patient lives who show early signs of a cardiac arrest. Hospital administrators should continue to use strategies to improve nurses' timely response to the clinical deterioration of patients and to continue to collect data to assess the effect of the RRT over time.

Qualitative Study on Safe and Effective Handover Information during a Rapid Response Team Encounter

Introduction

A rapid response team (RRT) evaluates and manages patients at risk of clinical deterioration. There is limited literature on the structure of the rapid response encounter from the floor to the intensive care unit team. We aimed to define this encounter and examine provider experiences to elucidate what information healthcare staff need to safely manage patients during an RRT evaluation.

Methods

This phenomenological qualitative study included 6 focus groups (3 in-person and 3 virtually) organized by provider type (nurses, residents, fellows, attendings), which took place until thematic saturation was reached. Two authors inductively coded transcripts and used a quota sampling strategy to ensure that the focus groups represented key stakeholders. Transcripts were then analyzed to identify themes that providers believe influence the RRT's quality, efficacy, and efficiency and their ability to manage and treat the acutely decompensating pediatric patient on the floor.

Results

Transcript coding yielded 38 factors organized into 8 themes. These themes are a summary statement or recap, closed-loop communication, interpersonal communication, preparation, duration, emotional validation, contingency planning, and role definition.

Conclusions

The principal themes of utmost importance at our institution during an RRT encounter are preparation, a brief and concise handoff from the floor team, and a summary statement from the intensive care unit team with contingency planning at the end of the encounter. Our data suggest that some standardization may be beneficial during the handoff.

Mortality of patients with hospital-onset sepsis in hospitals with all-day and non-all-day rapid response teams: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study

Background

Hospital-onset sepsis is associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate than community-onset sepsis. Many hospitals have implemented rapid response teams (RRTs) for early detection and timely management of at-risk hospitalized patients. However, the effectiveness of an all-day RRT over a non-all-day RRT in reducing the risk of in-hospital mortality in patient with hospital-onset sepsis is unclear. We aimed to determine the effect of the RRT’s operating hours on in-hospital mortality in inpatient patients with sepsis.

Methods

We conducted a nationwide cohort study of adult patients with hospital-onset sepsis prospectively collected from the Korean Sepsis Alliance (KSA) Database from 16 tertiary referral or university-affiliated hospitals in South Korea between September of 2019 and February of 2020. RRT was implemented in 11 hospitals, of which 5 (45.5%) operated 24-h RRT (all-day RRT) and the remaining 6 (54.5%) had part-day RRT (non-all-day RRT). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality between the two groups.

Results

Of the 405 patients with hospital-onset sepsis, 206 (50.9%) were admitted to hospitals operating all-day RRT, whereas 199 (49.1%) were hospitalized in hospitals with non-all-day RRT. A total of 73 of the 206 patients in the all-day group (35.4%) and 85 of the 199 patients in the non-all-day group (42.7%) died in the hospital (P = 0.133). After adjustments for co-variables, the implementation of all-day RRT was associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.35–0.93; P = 0.024).

Conclusions

In comparison with non-all-day RRTs, the availability of all-day RRTs was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality among patients with hospital-onset sepsis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04149-z.

A physician-led medical emergency team increases the rate of medical interventions: A multicenter study in Korea

BACKGROUND

According to the rapid response system's team composition, responding teams were named as rapid response team (RRT), medical emergency team (MET), and critical care outreach. A RRT is often a nurse-led team, whereas a MET is a physician-led team that mainly plays the role of an efferent limb. As few multicenter studies have focused on physician-led METs, we comprehensively analyzed cases for which physician-led METs were activated.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed cases for which METs were activated. The study population consisted of subjects over 18 years of age who were admitted in the general ward from January 2016 to December 2017 in 9 tertiary teaching hospitals in Korea. The data on subjects' characteristics, activation causes, activation methods, performed interventions, in-hospital mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) transfer after MET activation were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

In this study, 12,767 cases were analyzed, excluding those without in-hospital mortality data. The subjects' median age was 67 years, and 70.4% of them were admitted to the medical department. The most common cause of MET activation was respiratory distress (35.1%), followed by shock (11.8%), and the most common underlying disease was solid cancer (39%). In 7,561 subjects (59.2%), the MET was activated using the screening system. The commonly performed procedures were arterial line insertion (17.9%), intubation (13.3%), and portable ultrasonography (13.0%). Subsequently, 29.4% of the subjects were transferred to the ICU, and 27.2% died during hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

This physician-led MET cohort showed relatively high rates of intervention, including arterial line insertion and portable ultrasonography, and low ICU transfer rates. We presume that MET detects deteriorating patients earlier using a screening system and begins ICU-level management at the patient's bedside without delay, eventually preventing the patient's condition from worsening and transfer to the ICU.

The comparative ability of commonly used disease severity scores to predict death or a requirement for ICU care in patients hospitalised with possible sepsis in Yangon, Myanmar

OBJECTIVES

To determine the comparative prognostic utility of commonly used disease prediction scores in adults with presumed community-acquired sepsis in a resource-limited tropical setting.

METHODS

This prospective, observational study was performed on the medical ward of a tertiary-referral hospital in Yangon, Myanmar. The ability of the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2), quick NEWS (qNEWS), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, Universal Vital Assessment (UVA) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores to predict a complicated inpatient course (death or requirement for intensive care unit (ICU) support) in patients with two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria was determined.

RESULTS

Among the 509 patients, 30 (6%) were HIV-seropositive. The most commonly confirmed diagnoses were tuberculosis (30/509, 5.9%) and measles (26/509, 5.1%). Overall, 75/509 (14.7%) died or required ICU support. All the scores except the qSOFA score, which was inferior, had a similar ability to predict a complicated inpatient course.

CONCLUSIONS

In this resource-limited tropical setting, disease severity scores calculated at presentation using only vital signs-such as the NEWS2 score-identified high-risk sepsis patient as well as the SOFA score, which is calculated at 24 h and which also requires laboratory data. Use of these simple clinical scores can be used to facilitate recognition of the high-risk patient and to optimise the use of finite resources.

Association between intensive care unit occupancy at discharge, afterhours discharges, and clinical outcomes: a historical cohort study

PURPOSE

There is a paucity of evidence evaluating whether intensive care unit (ICU) discharge occupancy is associated with clinical outcomes. It is unknown whether increased discharge occupancy leads to greater afterhours discharges and downstream consequences. We explore the association between ICU discharge occupancy and afterhours discharges, 72-hr readmission, and 30-day mortality.

METHODS

This single-centre, historical cohort study included all patients discharged from the Vancouver General Hospital ICU between 5 April 2010 and 13 September 2017. Data were obtained from the British Columbia Critical Care Database. Occupancy was defined as the number of ICU bed hours utilized divided by the available bed hours for that day. Any discharge between 22:00 and 6:59 was considered afterhours. Logistic regression models adjusting for important covariates were constructed.

RESULTS

We included 8,862 ICU discharges representing 7,288 individual patients. There were 1,180 (13.3%) afterhours discharges, 408 (4.6%) 72-hr readmissions, and 574 (6.5%) 30-day post-discharge deaths. Greater discharge occupancy was associated with afterhours discharges (per 10% increase: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.20; P = 0.005). Discharge occupancy was not associated with 72-hr readmission (per 10% increase: aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.09; P = 0.62) or 30-day mortality (per 10% increase: aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.16; P = 0.32). Afterhours discharge was not associated with 72-hr readmission (aOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.54; P = 0.34) or 30-day mortality (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.36; P = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater ICU discharge occupancy was associated with a significant increase in afterhours discharges. Nevertheless, neither discharge occupancy nor afterhours discharge were associated with 72-hr readmission or 30-day mortality.