Rituximab for non-infectious Uveitis and Scleritis

Ophthalmic Use of Targeted Biologics in the Management of Intraocular Diseases: Current and Emerging Therapies

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have demonstrated substantial potential in the treatment of intraocular diseases. This review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the applications, efficacy, and safety of mAbs in the management of intraocular conditions.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in major medical databases through July 2024. Relevant studies on monoclonal antibodies for intraocular diseases were included. Two independent researchers screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed study quality. Cost-effectiveness analyses were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies, such as bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept, showed significant therapeutic effects in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors demonstrated promising results in treating noninfectious uveitis. Complement system-targeted therapies like pegcetacoplan offered new options for geographic atrophy. Anti-VEGF antibodies showed potential in managing retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). However, challenges persist, including high costs, potential drug resistance, and limited long-term safety data in certain scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

Monoclonal antibodies are vital for treating intraocular diseases, but continuous innovation and rigorous clinical evaluation are essential. Future research should focus on developing novel delivery systems, exploring combination therapies, conducting long-term follow-up studies, and investigating personalized treatment strategies to provide safer, more effective, and cost-effective therapeutic solutions.

Rituximab in the Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Review

Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) is an immune-mediated disorder manifesting as ocular pain, redness, floaters, and photophobia, and is a leading cause of preventable blindness. Managing NIU presents considerable challenges due to the condition's resistance to high-dose corticosteroids and various immunotherapies. This review assesses the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in the treatment of NIU, based on individual case reports and small-scale studies. A cohort of 78 patients (20 males, 58 females), with a mean onset age of 32.3 years (range 8-72), was analyzed. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) was the most frequently associated comorbidity, affecting 28 patients, while anterior uveitis was the predominant subtype, observed in 26 of 47 cases. Prior to RTX therapy, patients had been treated with an average of 1.7 conventional immunosuppressive agents (range 0-5) and 1.1 biologics (range 0-4). RTX was introduced following the failure of high-dose corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs, and biologics to control the uveitis. The median time from diagnosis to RTX initiation was 7.7 years (range 0.25-21). Post-RTX, 44.2% of patients experienced improvement in visual acuity, 79.5% achieved resolution of ocular inflammation, and 8.9% showed partial improvement. Additionally, 81.1% were able to reduce their corticosteroid dosage. Overall, 88.6% (69 out of 78) demonstrated a positive response to RTX treatment. These findings indicate that RTX may serve as an effective therapeutic option for NIU unresponsive to steroids and multiple immunotherapies. It may also warrant consideration as a potential first-line treatment in certain cases.

Decoding Behcet's Uveitis: an In-depth review of pathogenesis and therapeutic advances

Behcet's disease (BD) is a rare but globally distributed vasculitis that primarily affects populations in the Mediterranean and Asian regions. Behcet's uveitis (BU) is a common manifestation of BD, occurring in over two-thirds of the patients. BU is characterized by bilateral, chronic, recurrent, non-granulomatous uveitis in association with complications such as retinal ischemia and atrophy, optic atrophy, macular ischemia, macular edema, and further neovascular complications (vitreous hemorrhage, neovascular glaucoma). Although the etiology and pathogenesis of BU remain unclear, numerous studies reveal that genetic factors (such as HLA-B51), dysregulated immune responses of both the innate and adaptive immune systems, infections (such as streptococcus), and environmental factors (such as GDP) are all involved in its development. Innate immunity, including hyperactivity of neutrophils and γδT cells and elevated NK1/NK2 ratios, has been shown to play an essential role in this disease. Adaptive immune system disturbance, including homeostatic perturbations, Th1, Th17 overaction, and Treg cell dysfunction, is thought to be involved in BU pathogenesis. Treatment of BU requires a tailored approach based on the location, severity of inflammation, and systemic manifestations. The therapy aims to achieve rapid inflammation suppression, preservation of vision, and prevention of recurrence. Systemic corticosteroids combined with other immunosuppressive agents have been widely used to treat BU, and beneficial effects are observed in most patients. Recently, biologics have been shown to be effective in treating refractory BU cases. Novel therapeutic targets for treating BU include the LCK gene, Th17/Treg balance, JAK pathway inhibition, and cytokines such as IL-17 and RORγt. This article summarizes the recent studies on BU, especially in terms of pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria and classification, auxiliary examination, and treatment options. A better understanding of the significance of microbiome composition, genetic basis, and persistent immune mechanisms, as well as advancements in identifying new biomarkers and implementing objective quantitative detection of BU, may greatly contribute to improving the adequate management of BU patients.

The enigma of sclera-specific autoimmunity in scleritis

Scleritis is a severe and painful ophthalmic disorder, in which a pathogenic role for collagen-directed autoimmunity was repeatedly suggested. We evaluated the presence of sclera-specific antibodies in a large cohort of patients with non-infectious scleritis. Therefore, we prospectively collected serum samples from 121 patients with non-infectious scleritis in a multicenter cohort study in the Netherlands. In addition, healthy (n = 39) and uveitis controls (n = 48) were included. Serum samples were tested for anti-native human type II collagen antibodies using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Further, sclera-specific antibodies were determined using indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on primate retinal/scleral cryosections. Lastly, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing was performed in 111 patients with scleritis. Anti-type II collagen antibodies were found in 13% of scleritis patients, in 10% of healthy controls and in 11% of uveitis controls (p = 0.91). A specific reaction to scleral nerve tissue on IIF was observed in 33% of patients with scleritis, which was higher than in healthy controls (11%; p = 0.01), but similar to uveitis controls (25%; p = 0.36). Reactivity to the scleral nerve tissue was significantly associated with earlier onset of scleritis (48 versus 56 years; p < 0.001), bilateral involvement (65% versus 42%; p = 0.01), and less frequent development of scleral necrosis (5% versus 22%; p = 0.02). HLA-B27 was found to be twice as prevalent in patients with scleritis (15.3%) compared to a healthy population (7.2%). In conclusion, scleral nerve autoantibody reactivity was more common in scleritis and uveitis patients in contrast to healthy controls. Further research is needed to characterize these scleral-nerve directed antibodies and assess their clinical value.

Repurposing of rituximab biosimilars to treat B cell mediated autoimmune diseases

Rituximab, the first monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of lymphoma, eventually became one of the most popular and versatile drugs ever in terms of clinical application and revenue. Since its patent expiration, and consequently, the loss of exclusivity of the original biologic, its repurposing as an off-label drug has increased dramatically, propelled by the development and commercialization of its many biosimilars. Currently, rituximab is prescribed worldwide to treat a vast range of autoimmune diseases mediated by B cells. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of rituximab repurposing in 115 autoimmune diseases across 17 medical specialties, sourced from over 1530 publications. Our work highlights the extent of its off-label use and clinical benefits, underlining the success of rituximab repurposing for both common and orphan immune-related diseases. We discuss the scientific mechanism associated with its clinical efficacy and provide additional indications for which rituximab could be investigated. Our study presents rituximab as a flagship example of drug repurposing owing to its central role in targeting cluster of differentiate 20 positive (CD20) B cells in 115 autoimmune diseases.

Intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy for patients with severe ocular inflammatory diseases who failed other immunomodulatory therapies

BACKGROUND

Ocular inflammatory diseases, including scleritis and uveitis, have been widely treated with immunomodulatory therapies (IMTs) as a steroid-sparing approach. Such strategy includes conventional therapies (antimetabolites, alkylating agents, and calcineurin inhibitors) as well as biologic agents like adalimumab, infliximab, rituximab, and tocilizumab. Cyclophosphamide (CP) is an alkylating agent and mainly inhibits the functioning of both T and B cells. Though known to have potential adverse events, including bone marrow suppression, hemorrhagic cystitis, and sterility, CP has been shown to be efficacious, especially in recalcitrant cases and when used intravenous (IV) for a limited period.

MAIN FINDINGS

We conducted a retrospective case-series to assess the safety and efficacy of CP therapy for patients with severe ocular inflammatory diseases who failed other IMTs. Medical records of 1295 patients who presented to the Uveitis Clinic at the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford between 2017 and 2022 were reviewed. Seven patients (10 eyes) who received CP therapy for ocular inflammatory diseases with at least one year of follow-up were included. The mean age of the patients (4 males, 3 females) was 61.6 ± 14.9 (43.0-89.0) years. Clinical diagnoses included necrotizing scleritis (5 eyes), peripheral ulcerative keratitis (2 eyes), orbital pseudotumor (1 eye), HLA-B27 associated panuveitis and retinal vasculitis (2 eyes). Ocular disease was idiopathic in 3 patients, and was associated with rheumatoid arthritis, IgG-4 sclerosing disease, dermatomyositis, and ankylosing spondylitis in 1 patient each. All the patients had history of previous IMT use including methotrexate (5), mycophenolate mofetil (3), azathioprine (1), tacrolimus (1), adalimumab (2), infliximab (4), and rituximab (1). The mean follow-up time was 34.4 ± 11.0 (13-45) months, and mean duration of CP therapy was 11.9 ± 8.8 (5-28) months. Remission was achieved in 5 patients (71.4%). Four patients (57.1%) experienced transient leukopenia (white blood cell count < 4000/mL).

SHORT CONCLUSION

CP therapy can be considered a potentially effective and relatively safe therapeutic option for patients with severe ocular inflammatory diseases who failed other IMTs including biologics (TNFa and CD20 inhibitors).

[Scleritis and episcleritis]

Scleritis and episcleritis are rare ocular inflammatory diseases but deserve to be known by internists because of their frequent association with systemic autoimmune diseases. It is important to distinguish them between because their prognosis, therapeutic management and potential complications are very different. Episcleritis represents a superficial ocular inflammation with usually benign visual prognosis, no complication with local treatment, and is associated with a systemic autoimmune disease in rare cases. In contrast, scleritis is a potentially serious ophthalmological condition that can threaten the visual prognosis in the absence of appropriate systemic treatment. It is associated with an underlying disease in 40-50% of cases, in particular a systemic autoimmune disease (25-35% of cases) or an infectious cause (5-10% of cases). Rheumatoid arthritis and systemic vasculitides, particularly antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides, are the main autoimmune causes of scleritis and episcleritis. Scleritis can reveal the underlying autoimmune disease and requires systematic etiological investigations. Aggressive, complicated, refractory forms or those associated with a systemic autoimmune disease require glucocorticoids or even immunosuppressants, and close collaboration between ophthalmologists and internists is required. The development of biologic agents offers new effective therapeutic tools in the management of these difficult cases.

Inflammatory eye disease for rheumatologists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides a framework for understanding inflammatory eye disease diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and management for rheumatologists. Uveitis, scleritis, episcleritis, peripheral ulcerative keratitis, and orbital inflammation are all discussed. The goal is to facilitate the development of approaches to inflammatory eye diseases that will help rheumatologists co-manage these patients with eye care providers specializing in ocular inflammation.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, studies have aimed to advance biologic treatments and define standard-of-care therapy. Inflammatory eye diseases are highly heterogeneous and often rare, which poses significant challenges to their research and the interpretation of existing data. To date, glucocorticoids, mycophenolate, methotrexate, and TNF inhibitors remain the mainstay of treatment options for many of these diseases.

SUMMARY

Patients with inflammatory eye diseases require multidisciplinary care for best outcomes, frequently including rheumatologists. Understanding the differentials, diagnostics, and treatment are essential to preserving vision in these patients. The diverse nature of the disease processes within this field requires focusing on specific disease phenotypes and endotypes in research and clinical practice.

Non-anti TNFα biologic agents for non-infectious uveitis associated with systemic inflammatory diseases: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Non-infectious uveitis related to systemic inflammatory diseases represents a leading cause of blindness. Anti-TNFα agents are the first-line biologic therapy after traditional immunosuppressants, both for the control of ocular and systemic involvement. However, a subgroup of patients fails anti-TNFα agents, due to primary inefficacy, loss of efficacy or adverse events.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review summarizes current evidence on the efficacy and safety of non-anti-TNFα biologics in adult patients with non-infectious uveitis associated with systemic inflammatory diseases. The systematic review of PubMed and Embase yielded 3663 records, from which 16 studies were included (13 non-controlled, 3 controlled trials). Most studies focused on Behçet's syndrome (BS) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and assessed the efficacy of tocilizumab (n=11), rituximab (n=3), secukinumab (n=1), or anakinra/canakinumab (n=1). A body of evidence supports the use of tocilizumab BS and JIA-associated uveitis, for improving visual acuity, reducing central macular thickness, inducing ocular remission, and sparing corticosteroids. Preliminary data suggest that rituximab may represent a valid alternative, particularly in JIA, while anakinra/canakinumab might play a role in BS-associated uveitis. Conversely, the role of secukinumab appears limited.

EXPERT OPINION

Current evidence encourages further investigations on the efficacy and safety of non-anti-TNFα agents in non-infectious non-idiopathic uveitis.

Perspectives of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biological Agents in Non-Infectious Uveitis Treatment: A Review

Biological drugs, especially those targeting anti-tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) molecule, have revolutionized the treatment of patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU), a sight-threatening condition characterized by ocular inflammation that can lead to severe vision threatening and blindness. Adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX), the most widely used anti-TNFα drugs, have led to greater clinical benefits, but a significant fraction of patients with NIU do not respond to these drugs. The therapeutic outcome is closely related to systemic drug levels, which are influenced by several factors such as immunogenicity, concomitant treatment with immunomodulators, and genetic factors. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug and anti-drug antibody (ADAbs) levels is emerging as a resource to optimise biologic therapy by personalising treatment to bring and maintain drug concentration within the therapeutic range, especially in those patients where a clinical response is less than expected. Furthermore, some studies have described different genetic polymorphisms that may act as predictors of response to treatment with anti-TNFα agents in immune-mediated diseases and could be useful in personalising biologic treatment selection. This review is a compilation of the published evidence in NIU and in other immune-mediated diseases that support the usefulness of TDM and pharmacogenetics as a tool to guide clinicians’ treatment decisions leading to better clinical outcomes. In addition, findings from preclinical and clinical studies, assessing the safety and efficacy of intravitreal administration of anti-TNFα agents in NIU are discussed.

Pediatric Scleritis: An Update

Posterior idiopathic scleritis is the most common type of scleritis observed in childhood. Nevertheless, anterior and even necrotizing inflammatory scleritis may occur as well. Although less frequently than in the adult population, scleral inflammation can be associated with systemic disorders, which should be promptly recognized and treated to avoid both ocular and systemic complications. Hence, a multidisciplinary diagnostic work-up should be performed to rule out primarily infectious and autoimmune causes, such as viral and bacterial infections, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, pediatric sarcoidosis, Behçet's disease and HLA-B27-associated diseases. Treatment of scleritis should aim to control ocular inflammation, relieve symptoms and prevent relapses, to avoid complications, preserve visual acuity and improve the child's quality of life. It should be tailored to the patient, considering the type and severity of scleritis, the possible identification of an infectious cause or the presence of an associated rheumatologic condition.

Local versus Systemic Therapy for Noninfectious Uveitis (NIU)

The mainstay of treatment for noninfectious uveitis (NIU) is immunosuppressant therapy. This may come in a localized form that is administered specifically to the eye or a systemic form that penetrates ocular tissues. Over the last twenty years, both local and systemic treatments have undergone advancements in pharmaceutical development. In this review, we will discuss new therapies and analyze the risks and benefits for all existing NIU therapies. Some of these therapies include topical, intravitreal, periocular, and systemic steroids, as well as systemic antimetabolites, tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, T-cell inhibitors, anti-CD 20 agents, interleukin-6 inhibitors, alkylating agents, and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Alternative Biologic Therapy in Children Failing Conventional TNFα Inhibitors for Refractory, Noninfectious, Chronic Anterior Uveitis

PURPOSE

A significant number of children with noninfectious, chronic anterior uveitis (CAU) fail to respond to conventional therapy; however, successful alternative biologic treatments (ABT) have not been well described. This study aims to review the clinical and treatment characteristics of children with CAU who require ABT.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized clinical study.

METHODS

Setting: Tertiary center.

STUDY POPULATION

Children with noninfectious CAU.

OBSERVATION PROCEDURES

Clinical characteristics, uveitis course, complications, and treatment were compared among patients treated with methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy, conventional TNFα inhibitors (cTNFi), and ABT for >3 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Success of ABT (abatacept, tocilizumab, and/or golimumab) in children failing conventional treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 52 children with CAU, 75% had juvenile idiopathic arthritis. CAU was controlled in 15 children receiving MTX monotherapy, 28 receiving cTNFi, and 9 receiving ABT (n = 1, abatacept; n = 3, tocilizumab; n = 5, golimumab). Patients in the ABT group had a greater number of total ocular complications per person before ABT than those in the control groups (3.4 vs 0.7 [MTX], P < .001, and 1.5 [cTNFi], P < .001, respectively). In all 9 children on ABT, treatment led to control of CAU and topical glucocorticoids tapered to ≤2 drops/d with no new ocular complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, alternative biologics (abatacept, golimumab, and tocilizumab) were useful for treating CAU in children who fail MTX and cTNFi therapy. Patients who were controlled on ABT had more disease activity, ocular complications, and anti-cTNFi neutralizing antibodies (before ABT) than those managed with conventional therapy. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings.

Rituximab Attenuated Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Oxidative Cytotoxicity, Apoptosis, and Inflammation in the Human Retina Cells via Modulating the TRPM2 Signaling Pathways

PURPOSE

We investigated the possible protective effects of rituximab (RTX) on LPS-induced oxidant, inflammatory, and apoptotic adverse actions via the inhibition of TRPM2 channel in the adult retinal pigment epithelial-19 (ARPE-19) cells.

METHODS

In the cultured ARPE-19 cells, we induced five main groups as control, RTX (10 μg/ml), LPS (1 μg/ml), LPS+RTX, and LPS+TRPM2 blockers (ACA or 2/APB).

RESULTS

The levels of apoptosis, cell death, mitochondrial free reactive oxygen radicals (mitROS), cytosolic ROS, lipid peroxidation, caspase -3, caspase -8, caspase -9, ADP-ribose-induced TRPM2 current density, TNF-α, IL-1β, cytosolic free Zn2+, and Ca2+ were increased by LPS, although their levels were diminished by the treatments of RTX and TRPM2 blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

The LPS-induced mitROS, inflammatory cytokine, and apoptosis levels were modulated via TRPM2 inhibition in the human retinal epithelial cells by the RTX treatment. The RTX may be considered as a new therapeutic approach to LPS-induced human retinal epithelial cell injury.

Subconjunctival Rituximab Administration for the Treatment of Scleritis

PURPOSE

Scleritis is a sight-threatening inflammation, which is commonly accompanied by severe complications. Aggressive systemic immunosuppressive treatment, which is frequently needed, can be associated with serious complications, and might therefore be (temporarily) contraindicated.

METHODS

We report on the outcomes of three patients with severe, active, non-infectious scleritis, refractory or intolerant to systemic treatment, who received subconjunctival rituximab (RTX) injections. A dose of 2.5 to 7.5 mg was administered after topical anesthesia, and follow-up varied from 8 to 10 months.

RESULTS

Subconjunctival RTX showed minimal to no effect on subjective symptoms, clinical features and/or ultrasound images. No serious adverse effects occurred.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are needed to assess the effect of local administration of RTX in scleritis, but our limited observation is not promising.

[New possibilities in therapy of ocular inflammation in rheumatic diseases]

This review is devoted to the potential application of genetically engineered biological drugs of different classes in the treatment of main forms of uveitis and other types of non-infectious ocular inflammation in immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases. The article presents the results of studies demonstrating the influence of interleukin-17 inhibitor secukinumab on the course of uveitis in spondylarthritis, shows the possibilities of treating uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis with inhibitors of interleukin-6, co-stimulation of T-lymphocytes. Inhibition of interleukin-1 is considered an effective method of influencing the ocular inflammation in monogenic autoinflammatory syndromes and Behcet's disease. Rituximab is considered as an option for immunosuppressive therapy of non-infectious uveitis and scleritis.

Immunopathological Analysis of a Mouse Model of Arthritis-Associated Scleritis and Implications for Molecular Targeted Therapy for Severe Scleritis

Scleritis involves inflammation of the sclera, which constitutes 75% of the wall of the eye. This pathology is often seen as an ocular lesion associated with systemic inflammatory diseases. Severe types of scleritis such as posterior scleritis require urgent immunosuppressive treatments, including molecularly targeted therapies to avoid permanent visual impairment. Which molecules should be selected as targets has remained unclear. To clarify the pathogenesis of scleritis and propose appropriate target molecules for therapy, we have established novel animal model of scleritis by modifying the Collagen-II Induced Arthritis (CIA) model. Immunization twice with collagen II emulsified with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) caused arthritis and scleritis. The clinical appearance resembled human diffuse scleritis. Histopathological analysis suggested that macrophages, plasma cells, deposition of immune complexes, and growth of blood and lymphatic vessels are involved in the pathogenesis of CIA-associated scleritis. In addition, we analysed the background diseases of posterior scleritis and responses to molecularly targeted therapies as a case series study. We inferred from both the animal model and case series study that targets should not be T cells, but factors inhibiting macrophage activity such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-6, and molecules suppressing antibody-producing cells such as CD20 on B cells should be targeted by molecularly targeted therapies.

Risk Mitigation of Immunogenicity: A Key to Personalized Retinal Gene Therapy

Gene therapy (GT) for ocular disorders has advanced the most among adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated therapies, with one product already approved in the market. The bank of retinal gene mutations carefully compiled over 30 years, the small retinal surface that does not require high clinical vector stocks, and the relatively immune-privileged environment of the eye explain such success. However, adverse effects due to AAV-delivery, though rare in the retina have led to the interruption of clinical trials. Risk mitigation, as the key to safe and efficient GT, has become the focus of 'bedside-back-to-bench' studies. Herein, we overview the inflammatory adverse events described in retinal GT trials and analyze which components of the retinal immunological environment might be the most involved in these immune responses, with a focus on the innate immune system composed of microglial surveillance. We consider the factors that can influence inflammation in the retina after GT such as viral sensors in the retinal tissue and CpG content in promoters or transgene sequences. Finally, we consider options to reduce the immunological risk, including dose, modified capsids or exclusion criteria for clinical trials. A better understanding and mitigation of immune risk factors inducing host immunity in AAV-mediated retinal GT is the key to achieving safe and efficient GT.

Rituximab for treatment of non-infectious and non-malignant orbital inflammatory disease

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive review of rituximab use for the treatment of non-infectious/non-malignant orbital inflammation.

METHODS

Review of literature through January 2021.

RESULTS

Individual data was available for 167 patients with refractory non-infectious/non-malignant orbital inflammation who received treatment with rituximab (RTX). Rituximab was generally utilized as third-line or later treatment (108/149, 72.5%) at a mean of 44.6 months following the diagnosis of orbital inflammation (range = 0 to 360 months; median = 13.7 months). Patients with non-infectious/non-malignant orbital inflammation either received prior treatment with corticosteroids only (27/122, 22.1%), or with one (31/122, 25.4%), two (25/122, 20.5%), or three or more (25/122, 20.5%) corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents with or without corticosteroids before initiation of RTX treatment. The rheumatologic protocol (two infusions of 1 gram of RTX separated by 14 days) was utilized most frequently (80/144, 55.6%), followed by the oncologic protocol (four weekly infusions of 375 mg/m2 RTX; 51/144, 35.4%). Various other off-label regimens were used infrequently (13/144, 9.0%). Rituximab treatments resulted in a positive therapeutic response for the majority of patients with orbital inflammation (146/166, 88.0%). Commonly treated diagnoses included granulomatosis with polyangiitis (99/167, 59.3%), IgG-4 related disease (36/167, 21.6%), and orbital inflammation of indeterminate cause (25/167, 15.0%). No side effects were reported in 83.3% (55/66) of cases. The most common RTX-induced adverse event was an infusion-related temporary exacerbation of orbital disease (4/66, 6.1%), which occurred prior to the routine use of systemic corticosteroids as pre-conditioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, RTX appears to be both efficacious and well-tolerated as second- or third-line therapy for patients with non-infectious/non-malignant orbital inflammation.