1
|
Zolfaghari Emameh R, Hosseini SN, Parkkila S. Application of beta and gamma carbonic anhydrase sequences as tools for identification of bacterial contamination in the whole genome sequence of inbred Wuzhishan minipig (Sus scrofa) annotated in databases. Database (Oxford) 2021; 2021:baab029. [PMID: 34003248 PMCID: PMC8130508 DOI: 10.1093/database/baab029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Sus scrofa or pig was domesticated thousands of years ago. Through various indigenous breeds, different phenotypes were produced such as Chinese inbred miniature minipig or Wuzhishan pig (WZSP), which is broadly used in the life and medical sciences. The whole genome of WZSP was sequenced in 2012. Through a bioinformatics study of pig carbonic anhydrase (CA) sequences, we detected some β- and γ-class CAs among the WZSP CAs annotated in databases, while β- or γ-CAs had not previously been described in vertebrates. This finding urged us to analyze the quality of whole genome sequence of WZSP for the possible bacterial contamination. In this study, we used bioinformatics methods and web tools such as UniProt, European Bioinformatics Institute, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Ensembl Genome Browser, Ensembl Bacteria, RSCB PDB and Pseudomonas Genome Database. Our analysis defined that pig has 12 classical α-CAs and 3 CA-related proteins. Meanwhile, it was approved that the detected CAs in WZSP are categorized in the β- and γ-CA families, which belong to Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. The protein structure study revealed that the identified β-CA sequence from WZSP belongs to Pseudomonas aeruginosa with PDB ID: 5JJ8, and the identified γ-CA sequence from WZSP belongs to P. aeruginosa with PDB ID: 3PMO. Bioinformatics and computational methods accompanied with bacterial-specific markers, such as 16S rRNA and β- and γ-class CA sequences, can be used to identify bacterial contamination in mammalian DNA samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Zolfaghari Emameh
- Department of Energy and Environmental Biotechnology, National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (NIGEB), 14965/161, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Nezamedin Hosseini
- Department of Recombinant Hepatitis B Vaccine, Production and Research Complex, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seppo Parkkila
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Fimlab Ltd, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang P, Meng F, Moore BM, Shiu SH. Impact of short-read sequencing on the misassembly of a plant genome. BMC Genomics 2021; 22:99. [PMID: 33530937 PMCID: PMC7852129 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07397-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Availability of plant genome sequences has led to significant advances. However, with few exceptions, the great majority of existing genome assemblies are derived from short read sequencing technologies with highly uneven read coverages indicative of sequencing and assembly issues that could significantly impact any downstream analysis of plant genomes. In tomato for example, 0.6% (5.1 Mb) and 9.7% (79.6 Mb) of short-read based assembly had significantly higher and lower coverage compared to background, respectively. Results To understand what the causes may be for such uneven coverage, we first established machine learning models capable of predicting genomic regions with variable coverages and found that high coverage regions tend to have higher simple sequence repeat and tandem gene densities compared to background regions. To determine if the high coverage regions were misassembled, we examined a recently available tomato long-read based assembly and found that 27.8% (1.41 Mb) of high coverage regions were potentially misassembled of duplicate sequences, compared to 1.4% in background regions. In addition, using a predictive model that can distinguish correctly and incorrectly assembled high coverage regions, we found that misassembled, high coverage regions tend to be flanked by simple sequence repeats, pseudogenes, and transposon elements. Conclusions Our study provides insights on the causes of variable coverage regions and a quantitative assessment of factors contributing to plant genome misassembly when using short reads and the generality of these causes and factors should be tested further in other species. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-021-07397-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peipei Wang
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.,DOE Great Lake Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Fanrui Meng
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.,DOE Great Lake Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Bethany M Moore
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.,The Ecology, Evolution, and Behavioral Biology Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Shin-Han Shiu
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. .,DOE Great Lake Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. .,The Ecology, Evolution, and Behavioral Biology Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. .,Department of Computational Mathematics, Science, and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kreplak J, Madoui MA, Cápal P, Novák P, Labadie K, Aubert G, Bayer PE, Gali KK, Syme RA, Main D, Klein A, Bérard A, Vrbová I, Fournier C, d'Agata L, Belser C, Berrabah W, Toegelová H, Milec Z, Vrána J, Lee H, Kougbeadjo A, Térézol M, Huneau C, Turo CJ, Mohellibi N, Neumann P, Falque M, Gallardo K, McGee R, Tar'an B, Bendahmane A, Aury JM, Batley J, Le Paslier MC, Ellis N, Warkentin TD, Coyne CJ, Salse J, Edwards D, Lichtenzveig J, Macas J, Doležel J, Wincker P, Burstin J. A reference genome for pea provides insight into legume genome evolution. Nat Genet 2019; 51:1411-1422. [PMID: 31477930 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-019-0480-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 238] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
We report the first annotated chromosome-level reference genome assembly for pea, Gregor Mendel's original genetic model. Phylogenetics and paleogenomics show genomic rearrangements across legumes and suggest a major role for repetitive elements in pea genome evolution. Compared to other sequenced Leguminosae genomes, the pea genome shows intense gene dynamics, most likely associated with genome size expansion when the Fabeae diverged from its sister tribes. During Pisum evolution, translocation and transposition differentially occurred across lineages. This reference sequence will accelerate our understanding of the molecular basis of agronomically important traits and support crop improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Kreplak
- Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté Bourgogne, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Mohammed-Amin Madoui
- Génomique Métabolique, Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, CNRS, Université Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Petr Cápal
- Institute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Novák
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | - Karine Labadie
- Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Grégoire Aubert
- Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté Bourgogne, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Philipp E Bayer
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Krishna K Gali
- Crop Development Centre/Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Robert A Syme
- Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Dorrie Main
- Department of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - Anthony Klein
- Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté Bourgogne, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Aurélie Bérard
- Etude du Polymorphisme des Génomes Végétaux, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Iva Vrbová
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | - Cyril Fournier
- Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté Bourgogne, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Leo d'Agata
- Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Caroline Belser
- Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Wahiba Berrabah
- Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Helena Toegelová
- Institute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Zbyněk Milec
- Institute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Vrána
- Institute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - HueyTyng Lee
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Plant Breeding, IFZ Research Centre for Biosystems, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Ayité Kougbeadjo
- Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté Bourgogne, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Morgane Térézol
- Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté Bourgogne, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Cécile Huneau
- UMR 1095 Génétique, Diversité, Ecophysiologie des Céréales, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Chala J Turo
- Centre for Crop and Disease Management, School of Molecular and Life Science, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Pavel Neumann
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | - Matthieu Falque
- GQE-Le Moulon, INRA, University of Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Karine Gallardo
- Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté Bourgogne, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Rebecca McGee
- USDA Agricultural Research Service, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - Bunyamin Tar'an
- Crop Development Centre/Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Abdelhafid Bendahmane
- Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay, INRA, CNRS, University of Paris-Sud, University of Evry, University Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cite, University of Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Jean-Marc Aury
- Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Jacqueline Batley
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Noel Ellis
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Thomas D Warkentin
- Crop Development Centre/Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | - Jérome Salse
- UMR 1095 Génétique, Diversité, Ecophysiologie des Céréales, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - David Edwards
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Judith Lichtenzveig
- School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jiří Macas
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | - Jaroslav Doležel
- Institute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Patrick Wincker
- Génomique Métabolique, Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, CNRS, Université Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Judith Burstin
- Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté Bourgogne, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Acuña-Amador L, Primot A, Cadieu E, Roulet A, Barloy-Hubler F. Genomic repeats, misassembly and reannotation: a case study with long-read resequencing of Porphyromonas gingivalis reference strains. BMC Genomics 2018; 19:54. [PMID: 29338683 PMCID: PMC5771137 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4429-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Without knowledge of their genomic sequences, it is impossible to make functional models of the bacteria that make up human and animal microbiota. Unfortunately, the vast majority of publicly available genomes are only working drafts, an incompleteness that causes numerous problems and constitutes a major obstacle to genotypic and phenotypic interpretation. In this work, we began with an example from the class Bacteroidia in the phylum Bacteroidetes, which is preponderant among human orodigestive microbiota. We successfully identify the genetic loci responsible for assembly breaks and misassemblies and demonstrate the importance and usefulness of long-read sequencing and curated reannotation. RESULTS We showed that the fragmentation in Bacteroidia draft genomes assembled from massively parallel sequencing linearly correlates with genomic repeats of the same or greater size than the reads. We also demonstrated that some of these repeats, especially the long ones, correspond to misassembled loci in three reference Porphyromonas gingivalis genomes marked as circularized (thus complete or finished). We prove that even at modest coverage (30X), long-read resequencing together with PCR contiguity verification (rrn operons and an integrative and conjugative element or ICE) can be used to identify and correct the wrongly combined or assembled regions. Finally, although time-consuming and labor-intensive, consistent manual biocuration of three P. gingivalis strains allowed us to compare and correct the existing genomic annotations, resulting in a more accurate interpretation of the genomic differences among these strains. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we demonstrate the usefulness and importance of long-read sequencing in verifying published genomes (even when complete) and generating assemblies for new bacterial strains/species with high genomic plasticity. We also show that when combined with biological validation processes and diligent biocurated annotation, this strategy helps reduce the propagation of errors in shared databases, thus limiting false conclusions based on incomplete or misleading information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Acuña-Amador
- Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, CNRS, UMR6290, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.,Laboratorio de Investigación en Bacteriología Anaerobia, Centro de Investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales, Facultad de Microbiología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica
| | - Aline Primot
- Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, CNRS, UMR6290, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Edouard Cadieu
- Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, CNRS, UMR6290, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Alain Roulet
- GenoToul Genome & Transcriptome (GeT-PlaGe), INRA, US1426, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - Frédérique Barloy-Hubler
- Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, CNRS, UMR6290, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
| |
Collapse
|