Single and double pain responses to individually titrated ultra-short laser stimulation in humans

Painful Cutaneous Laser Stimulation for Temporal Summation of Pain Assessment

Variability in pain sensitivity arises not only from the differences in peripheral sensory receptors but also from the differences in central nervous system (CNS) pain inhibition and facilitation mechanisms. Temporal summation of pain (TSP) is an experimental protocol commonly used in human studies of pain facilitation but is susceptible to confounding when elicited with the skin-contact thermode, which adds the responses of touch-related Aβ low-threshold mechanoreceptors to nociceptive receptors. In the present study, we evaluate an alternative method involving the use of a contactless cutaneous laser for TSP assessment. We show that repetitive laser stimulations with a one second inter-stimulus interval evoked reliable TSP responses in a significant proportion of healthy subjects (N = 36). Female subjects (N = 18) reported greater TSP responses than male subjects confirming earlier studies of sex differences in central nociceptive excitability. Furthermore, repetitive laser stimulations during TSP induction elicited increased time-frequency electroencephalography (EEG) responses. The present study demonstrates that repetitive laser stimulation may be an alternative to skin-contact methods for TSP assessment in patients and healthy controls. PERSPECTIVE: Temporal summation of pain (TSP) is an experimental protocol commonly used in human studies of pain facilitation. We show that contactless cutaneous laser stimulation is a reliable alternative to the skin contact approaches during TSP assessment.

Randomized cross-over evaluation of investigator gender on pain thresholds in healthy volunteers

Background and aims: This randomized cross-over study in healthy volunteers was designed primarily to evaluate the potential impact of investigator gender on electrical pain threshold (EPT) and corresponding pain intensity levels, and secondly to evaluate potential differences in those interventions between female and male study participants. Methods: Forty adult volunteers (22 females) were included. An electrical stimulation device was used to determine EPT levels (in pain magnitude scores) in series of three in each study participant - once by a female, and once by a male investigator - according to a predefined cross-over design schedule. Corresponding levels of pain intensity were scored on a visual analog scale (VAS) slide ruler. Results: Study data was obtained and analysed in all participants. Significantly higher EPT levels were determined by the female investigator compared with the male investigator (median 22 (IQR 12-31) vs. 8 (6-10) pain magnitude scores; p<0.0001), despite similar levels of reported pain intensity (1.9 (1.2-3.0) vs. 2.0 (1.1-3.4) VAS units; p>0.300). There were no differences in EPT levels between female and male subjects evaluated by female (p>0.300) and male (p=0.125) investigators, or between the first and second series of stimulation (p>0.300). Conclusions: Our finding of significantly higher EPT levels when study participants of both genders - despite no difference in reported pain intensity - were evaluated by a female than by a male investigator, indicates a potential impact of investigator gender on the individual perception of pain. Implications: By contributing to a better understanding of how individual pain threshold levels are potentially influenced by investigator gender, this study might facilitate future evaluation of pain conditions in both preclinical and clinical settings.

Small nerve fiber selectivity of laser and intraepidermal electrical stimulation: A comparative study between glabrous and hairy skin

OBJECTIVES

In clinical neurophysiology practice, various methods of stimulation can be used to activate small-diameter nociceptive cutaneous afferents located in the epidermis. These methods include different types of laser and intraepidermal electrical stimulation techniques. The diffusion of the stimulation in the skin, inside or under the epidermis, depends on laser wavelength and electrode design, in particular. The aim of this study was to compare several of these techniques in their ability to selectively stimulate small nerve fibers.

METHODS

In 8 healthy subjects, laser stimulation (using a CO₂ or Nd:YAP laser) and intraepidermal electrical stimulation (using a micropatterned, concentric planar, or concentric needle electrode), were applied at increasing energy or intensity on the dorsal or volar aspect of the right hand or foot. The subjects were asked to define the perceived sensation (warm, pinprick, or electric shock sensation, corresponding to the activation of C fibers, Aδ fibers, or Aβ fibers, respectively) after each stimulation. Depending on the difference in the sensations perceived between dorsal (hairy skin with thin stratum corneum) and volar (glabrous skin with thick stratum corneum) stimulations, the diffusion of the stimulation inside or under the epidermis and the nature of the activated afferents were determined.

RESULTS

Regarding laser stimulation, the perceived sensations turned from warm to pinprick with increasing energies of stimulation, in particular with the Nd:YAP laser, of which pulse could penetrate deep in the skin according to its short wavelength. In contrast, CO₂ laser stimulation produced only warm sensations and no pricking sensation when applied to the glabrous skin, perhaps due to a thicker stratum corneum and the shallow penetration of the CO₂ laser pulse. Regarding intraepidermal electrical stimulation using concentric electrodes, the perceived sensations turned from pinprick to a combination of pinprick and electrical shocks with increasing intensities. Using the concentric planar electrode, the sensations perceived at high stimulation intensity even consisted of electric shocks without concomitant pinprick. In contrast, using the micropatterned electrode, only pinprick sensations were produced by the stimulation of the hairy skin, while the stimulation of the glabrous skin produced no sensation at all within the limits of stimulation intensities used in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the CO₂ laser or the micropatterned electrode, pinprick sensations were selectively produced by the stimulation of hairy skin, while only warm sensation or no sensation at all were produced by the stimulation of glabrous skin. These two techniques appear to be more selective with a limited diffusion of the stimulation into the skin, restricting the activation of sensory afferents to the most superficial and smallest intraepidermal nerve fibers.