Intraoperative glycemic control in patients undergoing Orthotopic liver transplant: a single center prospective randomized study

Evidence-based guideline for the prevention and management of perioperative infection

BACKGROUND

We have updated the guideline for preventing and managing perioperative infection in China, given the global issues with antimicrobial resistance and the need to optimize antimicrobial usage and improve hospital infection control levels.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence for prevention and management of perioperative infection, based on the concepts of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The strength of recommendations was graded and voted using the Delphi method and the nominal group technique. Revisions were made to the guidelines in response to feedback from the experts.

RESULTS

There were 17 questions prepared, for which 37 recommendations were made. According to the GRADE system, we evaluated the body of evidence for each clinical question. Based on the meta-analysis results, recommendations were graded using the Delphi method to generate useful information.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline provides evidence to perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis that increased the rational use of prophylactic antimicrobial use, with substantial improvement in the risk-benefit trade-off.

Effects of Intensive Blood Glucose Control on Surgical Site Infection for Liver Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The evidence supporting intensive blood glucose control to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs) among liver transplant recipients is insufficient. We aimed to assess the effects of postoperative intensive blood glucose control (IBGC) against standard blood glucose control (SBGC) on the incidence of SSIs among adult liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

We performed a randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03474666). The IBGC target was 80 to 130 mg/dL, and the SBGC target was below 180 mg/dL. Analyses were made on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

Of the 41 recipients enrolled onto the trial, 20 were randomly allocated to the IBGC group and 21 to the SBGC group. There were no significant differences in SSIs among recipients allocated to either group (relative risk [RR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.88; P = .69). Mean (SD) blood glucose levels were significantly lower in the IBGC group in the 24-hour period after surgery (145.0 [20.7] mg/dL and 230.2 [51.6] mg/dL; P = .001). While there were fewer episodes of hypoglycemia in the IBGC group, this was not statistically significant. There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia in either group. Hyperglycemia and severe hyperglycemia were significantly more frequent in the SBGC group (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.93; P = .001 and RR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.48; P = .001, respectively). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for recipients in the IBGC group (13.1 [5.5] days vs 19.3 [12.1] days; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this small trial did not find intensive control reduced SSI, it was associated with lower blood glucose levels, fewer episodes of hyperglycemia and severe hyperglycemia, and shorter length of hospital stay.

2020 Clinical Update in Liver Transplantation

The gold standard treatment of end-stage liver disease continues to be liver transplantation (LT). The challenges of LT require skilled anesthesiologists to anticipate physiologic changes associated with end-stage liver disease and surgical considerations that affect multiple organ systems. While on the waiting list, patients may be placed on new anticoagulation medications that can confound already complex coagulopathy in LT patients. Pain management often is an afterthought for such a complex procedure, but appropriate medications can help control pain while limiting opioid medications. Surgical stress and medications for immunosuppression can affect perioperative glucose management in ways that have implications for patient and graft survival. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in 2020 provided a new challenge for anesthesiologists. The uncertainty of the novel respiratory virus challenged providers beyond just LT patients.

Perioperative intensive glycemic control for liver transplant recipients to prevent surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) are common among liver transplant recipients and result in adverse patient outcomes. Standard glycemic control is effective in reducing SSIs. Some studies suggest intensive glycemic control reduces the risk of SSI further.

METHODS

For this systematic review, were searched for studies comparing perioperative intensive and standard glycemic control in liver transplant recipients. Clinical trials registries and reference lists of included studies were also searched. No date or language restrictions were applied. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE method. Cohort studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Two RCTs and three cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Low-quality evidence from the two RCTs in a meta-analysis with 264 recipients found it was uncertain whether the risk of SSI was reduced by having intensive glycemic control (Risk Ratio [RR] 1.52, 95% CI 0.66-3.51). However, there was an increased risk of hypoglycemia among recipients having intensive glycemic control (RR 2.34, 95% CI 1.40-3.92) n = 264. Meta-analyses found it uncertain whether secondary outcomes, allograft rejection and death, were reduced among recipients having intensive glycemic control; (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.48-1.50) and (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.44-1.95), respectively. The two cohort studies were poor quality and presented conflicting outcomes on the effects of intensive blood glucose control on SSI.

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of intensive glycemic control among liver transplant recipients to reduce SSIs.