The effect of perineural dexamethasone on rebound pain after ropivacaine single-injection nerve block: a randomized controlled trial

The Effects of Perineural Dexamethasone on Rebound Pain After Nerve Block in Patients With Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

A single nerve block provides excellent analgesia in a short time, but rebound pain after the nerve block dissipates has attracted researchers' attention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of perineural dexamethasone on rebound pain after sciatic nerve block and femoral nerve block in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

In a double-blinded fashion, we recruited 72 patients undergoing UKA, each of whom received sciatic and femoral nerve block. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups (n=36): X (ropivacaine only) and D (ropivacaine combined with dexamethasone). The primary outcome was the incidence of rebound pain. The secondary outcomes were rebound pain score, the duration of rebound pain, the duration of nerve block, pain score, sufentanil consumption and rescue analgesic, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, distance walked, sleep quality score, C-reactive protein levels, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Compared with group X, the incidence of rebound pain in group D was higher, the rebound pain score was higher and the duration of the nerve block was prolonged ( P <0.05). At 12, 16, and 20 hours postoperatively, the pain scores at rest in group D were lower. At 32 and 36 hours postoperatively, the pain scores at rest in group D were higher ( P <0.05). Furthermore, patients in group D had lower levels of C-reactive protein after surgery ( P <0.05).

DISCUSSION

The addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine for UKA effectively prolonged the duration of nerve block and decreased C-reactive protein levels, but increased the incidence of rebound pain and rebound pain score, and had no beneficial effects on the postoperative analgesia.

Reducing rebound pain severity after arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia and interscalene block: a two-centre randomized controlled trial of pre-emptive opioid treatment compared with placebo

PURPOSE

Although a single-injection interscalene block provides effective early postoperative analgesia following shoulder surgery, patients may experience "rebound pain" when the block resolves. Our objective was to determine if oral hydromorphone (2 mg) given six hours after a single-injection interscalene block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery leads to a clinically significant reduction in the severity of rebound pain.

METHODS

After approval from research ethics boards, we conducted a two-centre, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled superiority trial. Patients received preoperative interscalene block, general anesthesia, and either hydromorphone or placebo six hours after the block. The primary outcome was the worst pain score in the first 24 hr postoperatively, measured on an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale.

RESULTS

A total of 73 participants were randomly assigned to either the hydromorphone or placebo group. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean (standard deviation) worst pain score within 24 hr between the hydromorphone and placebo groups (6.5 [2.4] vs 5.9 [2.3]; mean difference, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, -0.5 to 1.8). Similarly, we did not find any significant difference in the pain trajectory, opioid use, or incidence of nausea and vomiting between the groups. The mean time to worst pain was 14.6 hr, and the mean time to first rescue analgesia was 11.3 hr after interscalene block.

CONCLUSION

Hydromorphone 2 mg given six hours after interscalene block did not reduce the severity of rebound pain postoperatively compared with placebo in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02939209); registered 19 October 2016.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone Intercostal Nerve Blocks for Robotic Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction For peripheral nerve blocks, using either the liposomal formulation of bupivacaine or plain bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone as an adjuvant has been shown to improve postoperative pain scores. In a single-blinded, randomized controlled study of patients undergoing robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, we determined if bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone was noninferior to liposomal bupivacaine mixed with plain bupivacaine when administered intraoperatively as an intercostal nerve block (INB). Methods A total of 34 patients undergoing robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were randomized to receive one of two injectate mixtures during their intraoperative INB. Group LB was administered 266 mg of 13.3 mg/mL liposomal bupivacaine with 24 mL of 0.5% plain bupivacaine, while Group BD was given 42 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine and 8 mg of dexamethasone. The primary outcomes were mean postoperative numerical pain ratings and mean postoperative opioid analgesic requirements. Secondary outcomes included adjuvant pain medication consumption, hospital length of stay, and total opioid use in oral morphine equivalents. Results Group LB exhibited no significant difference in pain scores (p = 0.437) and opioid analgesic requirement (p = 0.095) within the 72-hour postoperative period when compared to Group BD. The median total postoperative opioid requirement was 90 mg in Group LB, compared to 45 mg in Group BD. There were no significant differences in the use of postoperative adjuvant pain medications (gabapentin, p = 0.833; acetaminophen, p = 0.190; ketorolac, p = 0.699). Hospital length of stay did not differ between the groups. Conclusions INBs with the addition of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine provided noninferior postoperative analgesia compared to liposomal bupivacaine mixed with plain 0.5% bupivacaine.

Prophylactic dexamethasone for rebound pain after peripheral nerve block in adult surgical patients: systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Rebound pain occurs after the resolution of peripheral nerve block and hampers patient recovery in the postoperative period. We sought to synthesise available data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of prophylactic dexamethasone for rebound pain in adult patients undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, RCTs reporting rebound pain and use of dexamethasone in the context of a peripheral nerve block were searched in various databases and updated in May 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of rebound pain; secondary outcomes included the severity and time to onset of rebound pain, patient satisfaction with pain control, sleep disturbance because of pain, and adverse effects of dexamethasone. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the effect of route of administration (intravenous or perineural) on the incidence of rebound pain. Trial sequential analysis was performed to rule out the possibility of a false positive result.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs comprising 574 patients were included in this review. The dexamethasone group was associated with a reduction in the incidence of rebound pain with an odds ratio of 0.16 (95% confidence interval 0.10-0.27, P=0.00, I2=0%) compared with the control group. Trial sequential analysis confirmed the adequate information size for the beneficial effect of dexamethasone. Subgroup analysis showed that both intravenous and perineural administration were associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of rebound pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that both intravenous and perineural dexamethasone reduce the incidence of rebound pain after a peripheral nerve block provided for postoperative analgesia.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROSPERO CRD42023424031.

Advancing pain management for extremity trauma: the evolution of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks for patients in the supine position in trauma centers

PURPOSE

Trauma, particularly extremity trauma, poses a considerable challenge in healthcare, especially among young adults. Given the severity of patient pain and the risks associated with excessive opioid use, managing acute pain in trauma centers is inherently complex. This study aims to investigate the application and benefits of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks for early pain management in patients with extremity trauma positioned supine.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to assess the effectiveness and advantages of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks in the acute pain management of extremity trauma patients in the supine position. Special emphasis was placed on evaluating the selection criteria, indications, contraindications, adverse reactions, and potential complications associated with these nerve block techniques.

RESULTS

Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks represent a safer and more precise option for managing pain in extremity trauma patients placed in the supine position. These techniques offer significant advantages in terms of reducing healthcare expenses, diminishing reliance on opioid medications, and mitigating opioid-related complications. Nonetheless, challenges may arise due to the necessity for patient cooperation during specific nerve block procedures.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks present a promising avenue for early pain management in extremity trauma patients positioned supinely. Their implementation can lead to improved patient outcomes by alleviating pain severity, reducing opioid consumption, and cutting down healthcare costs. Further research and clinical integration of these techniques is imperative to enhance pain management protocols in trauma centers.

Intravenous injection of dexamethasone is non-inferior to perineural administration for popliteal sciatic nerve and saphenous nerve blocks: A randomized, controlled, triple-blind study

Background

The aim of this study was to assess whether intravenous dexamethasone was noninferior to perineural dexamethasone as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for a combination of saphenous and sciatic nerve blocks in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery.

Methods

This was a prospective, blinded, randomized noninferiority study. Seventy-five patients, aged 18-75 years, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III who underwent foot and ankle surgery were involved. Patients scheduled for ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block and saphenous nerve block were randomized to receive 0.375% ropivacaine with 7.5 mg of dexamethasone perineurally (Dex-PN), 10 mg of dexamethasone intravenously (Dex-IV) or neither (Placebo). The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. The major secondary outcomes were the composite pain intensity and opioid consumption score at 0-48 h intervals after anesthesia.

Results

The mean analgesic duration was 26.2 h in the Dex-IV group and 27.9 h in the Dex-PN group (duration difference, -1.7; 95% CI, -3.8 to 0.43; P = 0.117), and both durations were significantly longer than that in the placebo group (17.6 h, P < 0.001). Conditions for establishing non-inferiority were met.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that a single 10-mg intravenous dose of dexamethasone was noninferior to the combined dose of ropivacaine plus deaxmethasone in terms of duration of analgesia for foot and ankle surgery.

Continuous Superior Trunk Block versus Single-Shot Superior Trunk Block with Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Background/Objectives: Intravenous dexmedetomidine (DEX) can increase the analgesia duration of peripheral nerve block; however, its effect in combination with superior trunk block (STB) remains unclear. We examined whether combining single-shot STB (SSTB) with intravenous DEX would provide noninferior postoperative analgesia comparable to that provided by continuous STB (CSTB). Methods: Ninety-two patients scheduled for elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were enrolled in this prospective randomized trial. Patients were randomly assigned to the CSTB or SSTB + DEX group. Postoperatively, each CSTB group patient received 15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and a continuous 0.2% ropivacaine infusion. Each SSTB group patient received a 15 mL postoperative bolus injection of 0.5% ropivacaine. DEX was administered at 2 mcg/kg for 30 min post anesthesia, then maintained at 0.5 mcg/kg/h till surgery ended. Pain scores were investigated every 12 h for 48 h post operation, with evaluation of rebound pain incidence and opioid consumption. Results: The SSTB + DEX group had significantly higher median pain scores at 12 h post operation (resting pain, 8.0 vs. 3.0; movement pain, 8.0 vs. 5.0) and a higher incidence of rebound pain (56% vs. 20%) than the CSTB group. However, no significant between-group differences were observed in pain scores postoperatively at 24, 36, or 48 h. The CSTB group required less opioids and fewer rescue analgesics within 12-24 h post operation than the SSTB + DEX group. Conclusions: Compared with CSTB, SSTB + DEX required additional adjuvant or multimodal analgesics to reduce the risk and intensity of postoperative rebound pain in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Efficacy of Intravenous Administration of Esketamine in Preventing and Treating Rebound Pain After Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block: A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Purpose

Investigating the efficacy of intraoperative fractionated intravenous esketamine in the prevention of rebound pain after cessation of thoracic paravertebral nerve blockade.

Methods

One hundred and twenty patients who underwent elective thoracoscopic lobectomy were selected for the study and were randomly divided into two groups, the esketamine group was given 0.5 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine at the induction of anaesthesia and 30 minutes before the end of the operation, respectively, and the control group was given an equal amount of saline. The incidence of rebound pain (RP) 7 days after surgery and postoperative recovery were compared between the two groups.

Results

The NRS pain scores at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively in the esketamine group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative rebound pain was significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The consumption of sufentanil was less in the esketamine group in the postoperative 48 hours (P < 0.05). Postoperative recovery was compared between the two groups and the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Intravenous esketamine reduces postoperative pain scores, decreases the incidence of rebound pain after cessation of thoracic paravertebral block, and reduces opioid consumption.

Dexamethasone in anesthesia practice: A narrative review

Dexamethasone is routinely used in anesthesia practice and has been regarded as one of the ideal perioperative agents. It is a synthetic glucocorticoid with potent antiinflammatory action. It reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain, postoperative opioid requirements after general anaesthesia as well as spinal anaesthesia. It has been used via intravenous, epidural and perineural routes. It has been used successfully in fascial blocks. It significantly decreases fatigue, shivering and postoperative sore throat and improves quality of recovery.

Rebound pain and postoperative pain profile following brachial plexus block compared to general anaesthesia-An observational study

BACKGROUND

Regional anaesthesia has the benefit of reducing the need for systemic analgesia and therefore, potentially reducing undesired side effects. With the end of the sensory nerve block however, many patients report severe pain that requires therapy with opioids and often compromise the initial opioid sparing effect. This study aimed to characterise the postoperative pain profile and the phenomenon of rebound pain after axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia (RA) compared to general anaesthesia (GA).

DESIGN

Single-centre observational, stratified cohort study.

SETTING

The study was conducted at University Hospital Marburg from May 2020 until September 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred thirty-two patients receiving elective hand and forearm surgery were enrolled in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

Group RA received ultrasound-guided brachial plexus anaesthesia via the axillary approach with 30 mL of prilocaine 1% and 10 mL ropivacaine 0.2%. Group GA received balanced or total intravenous general anaesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary endpoint were integrated pain scores (IPS) within 24 h postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were pain scores (NRS 0-10), morphine equivalents, patient satisfaction, quality of recovery and opioid-related side effects.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-two patients were analysed of which 66 patients received brachial plexus block and 66 patients received general anaesthesia. Following RA significantly lower IPS were seen directly after surgery (p < .001) and during the post-anaesthesia care unit interval (p < .001) but equalised after 3 h at the ward. No overshoot in pain scores or increased opioid consumption could be detected. Patient satisfaction and postoperative recovery were comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSION

The IPS and NRS was initially lower in the RA group, increased with fading of the block until equal to the GA group and equal thereafter. Although various definitions of rebound pain were met during this phase, the opioid sparing effect of regional anaesthesia was not counteracted by it. The incidence of episodes with uncontrolled, severe pain did not differ between groups. We found no clinical implications of rebound pain in this setting, since the RA group did not show higher pain scores than the GA group at any time point.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00021764).

Rebound pain after interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery: a randomized clinical trial of the effect of different multimodal analgesia regimens

BACKGROUND

Rebound pain is characterized by sudden, significant acute postoperative pain occurring after the resolution of inter-scalene block (ISB); it affects the quality of recovery postoperatively. Dexamethasone increases ISB resolution time and decreases opioid consumption and the incidence of rebound pain.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate whether multimodal analgesia including intravenous dexamethasone administration with preoperative ISB reduces the incidence of rebound pain.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary university hospital.

SAMPLE SIZE

60 patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent shoulder surgery under general anesthesia were assigned randomly to two different multimodal analgesia protocols. Thirty patients received 5 mg IV dexamethasone with non-steroid, paracetamol, and ISB with 15 mL 0.5% bupivacaine, while the control patients received the same regimen and ISB with 15 mL 0.5% bupivacaine without dexamethasone. Postoperative opioids were given to any patient on demand.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Effect of IV dexamethasone on pain score and incidence of rebound pain after ISB resolution and postoperative opioid consumption at 0-48 hours, numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) scores, sleep scale scores, and quality of recovery-15 scores (QoR-15).

RESULTS

The incidence of rebound pain was lower in the dexamethasone group than in the control group (73.3% and 30%, respectively, P=.001). NPRS scores after ISB resolution were lower in the dexamethasone group (5 ([4-7]), 8 ([5.75-8]), P<.001, respectively). Those who received IV dexamethasone had less sleep disturbances (P<.001) and higher QoR-15 on day 1 (P<.001) and day 7 (P=.020) postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

IV dexamethasone added to the ISB block resulted in a lower incidence of rebound pain. In addition, better results were obtained in postoperative sleep quality and QoR-15.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study.

Postoperative analgesia after surgical repair of distal radius fracture: a randomized comparison between distal peripheral nerve blockade and surgical site infiltration

BACKGROUND

Pain following open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fracture (DRF) can be significant. This study compared the intensity of pain up to 48 hours after volar plating for DRF, associated to either an ultrasound guided distal nerve block (DNB) or surgical site infiltration (SSI).

METHODS

In this prospective single blind randomized study, 72 patients scheduled for DRF surgery under 1.5% lidocaine axillary block were allocated to receive, at the end of surgery, either an ultrasound-guided median and radial nerves block with ropivacaine 0.375% (DNB) performed by the anesthesiologist or a SSI with the same drug regimen, performed by the surgeon. Primary outcome was the duration between analgesic technique (H0) and pain reappearance (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 0-10)>3). Secondary outcomes were the quality of analgesia, the quality of sleep, the magnitude of motor blockade, and the patient satisfaction. The study was built on a statistical hypothesis of equivalence.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were included in the final per-protocol analysis (DNB=30, SSI=29). Time to reach NRS>3 was (in median [95%CI]) 267 min [155;727] and 164 min [120;181] respectively after DNB and SSI (difference=103 min [-22;594] - rejection of equivalence hypothesis). Pain intensity throughout the 48 hours, quality of sleep, opiate consumption, motor blockade and patient satisfaction was not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although DNB provides a longer analgesia than SSI, both techniques gave comparable level of pain control during the first 48 hours after surgery, without any difference in the incidence of side effects or patient satisfaction.

How Does the Addition of Dexamethasone to a Brachial Plexus Block Change Pain Patterns After Surgery for Distal Radius Fractures? A Randomized, Double-blind Study

BACKGROUND

Although brachial plexus block in volar plating surgery for distal radius fractures is reportedly associated with lower postoperative pain scores, rebound pain has been reported to occur after the initial block wears off. Dexamethasone can be used in multimodal strategies for antiemesis and to control pain postoperatively. Although prior studies have suggested that anesthesia can be prolonged by adding dexamethasone to regional blocks, no randomized trials we are aware of have ascertained whether doing so will make a clinically important difference in pain after surgery for distal radius fractures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Do patients who receive supplemental dexamethasone in a brachial plexus block for volar plating of unstable distal radius fractures have (1) better pain scores at 4, 8, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively than patients who have not received dexamethasone, and (2) lower fentanyl consumption and administration of antiemetic drugs without change in serum blood glucose, as well as a longer analgesic duration from the block after surgery than patients who have not received dexamethasone?

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind trial included 69 patients undergoing surgery for distal radius fractures under ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks who were randomly allocated into two groups: a nondexamethasone group receiving a brachial plexus block with 0.5% ropivacaine and a dexamethasone group receiving 0.5% ropivacaine and 5 mg of dexamethasone. Thirty-four patients were allocated to the dexamethasone group and 35 were allocated to the nondexamethasone group. Nine patients (four in the dexamethasone group and five in the nondexamethasone group) were excluded after randomization because local anesthetics were used during their surgical procedures owing to an incomplete block or they requested patient-controlled analgesia after surgery. The treatment groups did not differ in any important ways, including age, gender, BMI, hand dominance, and AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification. All patients received the same surgical procedure and perioperative care protocol, except for the injected agents during their brachial plexus block. The primary outcome was postoperative pain, evaluated using a 10-mm VAS at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. The minimum clinically important difference for the VAS score was 2 of 10 points. Secondary outcome variables included fentanyl administration as a rescue analgesic, the number of patients receiving antiemetic medications because of fentanyl administration, and the duration of brachial plexus block. Serum blood glucose was measured 1 day before, immediately after, and 24 hours after surgery. Patients, surgeons, and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation.

RESULTS

The only clinically important between-group difference in VAS pain scores was at 8 hours, favoring the group that received dexamethasone over the group that did not (1.9 ± 1.6 versus 4.7 ± 2.7; mean difference -2.8 [95% CI -3.9 to -1.6]; p < 0.001). After brachial plexus block, the most severe pain score in both groups was reported at 12 hours postoperatively and gradually diminished over time. There was no between-group difference in fentanyl use between those who received dexamethasone and those who did not (21 ± 38 mcg versus 31 ± 29 mcg; mean difference -10 [95% CI -27.4 to 7.4]; p = 0.26). Furthermore, the use of antiemetics did not differ between the groups (27% [eight of 30] versus 37% [11 of 30]; odds ratio 1.6 [95% CI 0.5 to 4.8]; p = 0.41). Baseline and 24-hour postoperative serum blood glucose level did not differ between the groups. However, the immediately postoperative serum blood glucose level was higher in the dexamethasone group than in the nondexamethasone group (121 ± 29 versus 104 ± 20; mean difference 16 [95% CI 3.3 to 28.8]; p = 0.02). The brachial plexus block duration was 3 hours longer (95% CI 0.8 to 5.2 hours) in the dexamethasone group than that in the nondexamethasone group (11 ± 5 hours versus 8 ± 3 hours; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The postoperative pain level in patients who received supplemental dexamethasone in a regional block was not clinically different from that of patients who received conventional brachial plexus block anesthesia when undergoing volar plating for distal radius fractures. However, patients who received a brachial plexus block with dexamethasone experienced slight prolongation of their block and decrease in pain 8 hours after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Optimal dose of perineural dexamethasone for the prolongation of analgesia for peripheral nerve blocks: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Perineural use of dexamethasone is demonstrated to extend the analgesia duration of peripheral nerve blocks (PNB), but its optimal dose remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the optimal dose of perineural dexamethasone in the prolongation of analgesia for PNB.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science will be searched from their inception to 1 March 2023. Language will be restricted to English. Randomised controlled trials that compared the efficacy and safety of different doses of perineural dexamethasone for PNB in adult patients will be included. Retrospective studies, reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, conference abstracts, comments and studies regarding paediatric surgeries will be excluded. The duration of analgesia will be defined as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes will include pain scores, the total analgesic requirement over 48 hours and the incidence of adverse effects. Two reviewers will independently perform the study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. RevMan V.5.3 software will be used for data analysis. The quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical approval is required. The results of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022385672.

Effect of Intravenous Dexamethasone Dose on the Occurrence of Rebound Pain after Axillary Plexus Block in Ambulatory Surgery

Rebound pain (RP) remains a challenge in ambulatory surgery, characterized by severe pain upon resolution of a peripheral nerve block (PNB). Intravenous (IV) administration of Dexamethasone (DEXA) potentiates PNB analgesic effect and reduces RP incidence although preventive effective dose remains undetermined. This retrospective analysis evaluates the preventive effect of IV DEXA on RP in outpatients undergoing upper limb surgery under axillary block. DEXA was divided into high (HD > 0.1 mg/kg) or low (LD < 0.1 mg/kg) doses. RP was defined as severe pain (NRS ≥ 7/10) within 24 h of PNB resolution. DEXA HD and LD patients were matched with control patients without DEXA (n = 55) from a previous randomized controlled study. Records of 118 DEXA patients were analyzed (DEXA dose ranged from 0.05 to 0.12 mg/kg). Intraoperative IV DEXA was associated with a significant reduction of the pain felt when PNB wore off as well as to a significant reduction of RP incidence (n = 27/118, 23% vs. 47% in controls, p = 0.002) with no effect related to the dose administered (p = 0.053). Our results support the administration of intraoperative DEXA as a preventive measure to reduce the occurrence of RP.

The Effects of Intravenous Dexamethasone on Rebound Pain After Nerve Block in Patients with Ankle Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

A single-injection nerve block provides excellent analgesia in a short time, but rebound pain after the nerve block disappears has attracted researchers' attention. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of intravenous dexamethasone on rebound pain after adductor canal block (ACB) and popliteal sciatic nerve block in patients with ankle fracture.

Methods

We recruited 130 patients with ankle fractures scheduled for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), each of whom received ACB and popliteal sciatic nerve block. Patients were divided into two groups: C (ropivacaine only) and IV (ropivacaine with intravenous dexamethasone). The primary outcome was the incidence of rebound pain. Secondary outcomes included the following: pain scores at 6 h (T₁), 12 h (T₂), 18 h (T₃), 24 h (T₄), and 48 h (T₅) after operation; duration of the nerve block; number of presses of the analgesia pump and rescue analgesic consumption in the three-day postoperative period; quality of recovery scale (QoR-15 score); postoperative sleep quality; satisfaction of patients; and levels of serum inflammatory markers (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) six hours after surgery.

Results

Compared with group C, the incidence of rebound pain in group IV was significantly reduced, and the duration of nerve block was extended by approximately nine hours (P<0.05). Moreover, patients in group IV had significantly lower pain scores at T₂-T₄, lower levels of serum inflammatory markers (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α), higher QoR-15 score two days after the operation, and satisfactory sleep quality the night after surgery (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Intravenous dexamethasone can reduce the rebound pain after adductor block and sciatic popliteal nerve block in patients with ankle fracture surgery, prolong the duration of nerve block, and improve the quality of early postoperative recovery.

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in Chinese patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Pain management after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a main concern for Chinese clinicians. This study aims to explore the effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on the postoperative analgesia of patients undergoing LC in China.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), 220 patients were randomized into the ESPB group and control group. Patients in the ESPB group received a bilateral ESPB, and patients in the control group were injected saline. Lornoxicam (0.08 mg/mL, 100 mL) was used as routine analgesia for both groups after the surgery. Visual analog scale (VAS) score at rest state at 12 h postoperative was the primary outcome and divided into no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, and severe pain.

RESULTS

Finally, 197 patients were included for analysis. At postoperative 12 h, ESPB group observed less patients with moderate pain (0% vs. 8.91%) and severe pain (0% vs. 0.99%) than the control group (P < 0.001). Moreover, ESPB group found less dose of additional sufentanil (5.55 ± 1.37 μg vs. 10.67 ± 5.05 μg), less requirement for rescue analgesia (13.54% vs. 31.68%), earlier first time to leave bed (10 h vs. 18 h), and earlier first exhaust time (17.5 h vs. 25 h), less adverse reactions (5.21% vs. 17.82%), and higher satisfaction degree (78.13% vs. 31.68%) (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ESPB was followed by better postoperative analgesia and less opioid consumption.

Role of adjuvants in regional anesthesia: A systematic review

The combination of drugs and routes of administration produces a synergistic effect, and one of the most important components of multimodal analgesic strategies are, therefore, nerve blocks for pain management. The effect of a local anaesthetic can be prolonged by administering an adjuvant. In this systematic review, we included studies on adjuvants associated with local anaesthetics in peripheral nerve blocks published in the last 5 years in order to evaluate their effectiveness. The results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. The 79 studies selected using our criteria showed a clear prevalence of dexamethasone (n=24) and dexmedetomidine (n=33) over other adjuvants. Different meta-analyses comparing adjuvants suggest that dexamethasone administered perineurally achieves superior blockade with fewer side effects than dexmedetomidine. Based on the studies reviewed, we found moderate evidence to recommend the use of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to peripheral regional anaesthesia in surgeries that can cause moderate to severe pain.

Sciatic Nerve Block Combined with Flurbiprofen Inhibits Spinal Cord Inflammation and Improves Postoperative Pain in Rats with Plantar Incision

Background and Purpose

Peripheral nerve block is often used to relieve postoperative pain. But the effect of nerve block on inflammatory response is not fully understood. Spinal cord is the primary center of pain processing. This study is to investigate the effect of single sciatic nerve block on the inflammatory response of the spinal cord in rats with plantar incision and the combined effect with flurbiprofen.

Methods

The plantar incision was used to establish a postoperative pain model. Single sciatic nerve block, intravenous flurbiprofen or the combination of both were used for intervention. The sensory and motor functions after nerve block and incision were evaluated. The changes of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, microglia and astrocytes in the spinal cord were examined by qPCR and immunofluorescence respectively.

Results

Sciatic nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine in rats induced sensory block for 2h and motor block for 1.5h. In the rats with plantar incision, the single sciatic nerve block did not alleviate postoperative pain or inhibit the activation of spinal microglia and astrocytes, but the levels of IL-1β and IL-6 in spinal cord were decreased when the nerve block wore off. The combined effect of a single sciatic nerve block and intravenous flurbiprofen not only decreased the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, but also relieved the pain and alleviated the activation of microglia and astrocytes.

Conclusion

The single sciatic nerve block cannot improve postoperative pain or inhibit the activation of spinal cord glial cells, but can reduce the expression of spinal inflammatory factors. Nerve block combined with flurbiprofen can inhibit spinal cord inflammation and improve postoperative pain. This study provides a reference for rational clinical application of nerve block.

Enhanced Recovery After Aesthetic Breast Surgery Under Sedation, Intercostal Block and Tumescent Anaesthesia: A Prospective Cohort Study of the Early Postoperative Phase

BACKGROUND

Comfort and recovery are major concerns of patients seeking aesthetic surgery. This study aimed to assess postoperative pain and recovery after outpatient breast surgery under sedation, intercostal block, and local anaesthesia.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included all consecutive patients who underwent aesthetic breast surgery between April 2021 and August 2022. Epidemiological data, anaesthesia, pain, and patients' satisfaction were systematically assessed with standardized self-assessment questionnaires.

RESULTS

Altogether, 48 patients [median (IQR) age: 30 (36-25)] were included. The most frequent surgery was mastopexy. 69% of surgeries involved additional procedures. The mean intercostal block and local anaesthesia time was 15 min. Patients received a median (IQR) of 19 (34-2) mg/kg lidocaine and 2.3 (2.5-2.0) mg/kg ropivacaine. The median (IQR) consumption of propofol and alfentanil was, respectively, 4.89 (5.48-4.26) mg/kg/h and 0.27 (0.39-0.19) µg/kg/min. No conversion to general anaesthesia or unplanned hospital admission occurred. Patients were discharged after a median (IQR) of 2:40 (3:43-1:58) hours. Within the first 24 postoperative hours, 17% required once an antiemetic medication and 38% an opioid. Patients were very satisfied with the anaesthesia and 90% of the patients had not wished more analgesia in the first 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Aesthetic breast surgery under sedation, intercostal block, and tumescent anaesthesia can safely be performed as an ambulatory procedure and is associated with minimal intra- and postoperative opioid consumption and high patient satisfaction. These data may be used to inform patients and clinicians and improve the overall quality of care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Rebound Pain After Peripheral Nerve Blockade-Bad Timing or Rude Awakening?

Patients who have perioperatively benefited from regional anesthesia frequently report moderate to severe pain when the nerve block effects fade away. Over the past years, the term "rebound pain" has been introduced, suggesting a specific pathologic process. It is debated whether significant pain on block resolution reflects a separate and distinct pathologic mechanism potentially involving proinflammatory and neurotoxic effects of local anesthetics, or is simply caused by the recovery of sensory function at a timepoint when nociceptive stimuli are still intense, and moderate to severe pain should be anticipated. In that latter case, the phenomenon referred to as rebound pain could be considered a failure of pain management providers to devise an adequate analgesia plan. Whatever the ultimate designation, management of rebound pain should be proactive, by implementing multimodal analgesia, or tailoring the blockade to the expected trajectory of postoperative pain and managing patient expectations accordingly. Until we know more about the etiology and impact of this phenomenon, the authors suggest a more neutral designation such as "pain on block resolution."

A Bioinformatics Study of Ropivacaine plus Dexamethasone Prolonging the Duration of Nerve Block

The study focuses on the potential function of dexamethasone on ropivacaine in sciatic nerve blocks. Nine Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into three groups: normal group (NG), control group (CG), and experimental group (EG), with three rats in each group. The CG was injected with diluted ropivacaine (0.5% concentration); the EG was injected with a diluted ropivacaine+dexamethasone mixture, and the NG was injected with an equal amount of saline. The sciatic nerve in the thigh was collected for sequencing two days after injection in each group. Differential analysis was performed for NG-vs-CG, NG-vs-EG, and CG-vs-EG based on the sequencing dataset. The modular genes associated with ropivacaine and ropivacaine+ dexamethasone were screened by weighted coexpression network analysis (WGCNA), differentially expressed modules among them were enriched for analysis, and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed to observe high and low expression among key genes in immune cells. Twenty-two and three differential genes associated with ropivacaine (green-yellow module) and ropivacaine+dexamethasone (palevioletred3 module) were acquired, respectively, which played important roles in biological processes such as erythrocyte homeostasis, erythroid differentiation, and hemoglobin metabolic processes. PPI revealed that AHSP, ALAS2, EPB42, HBB, and SLC4A1 were interacting and the expression of these five genes was upregulated in the CG compared with the NG, while the expression of them was downregulated in the EG compared with the CG. The immunological analysis also showed significant differences in the expression of various immune cells in the 3 groups. AHSP, ALAS2, EPB42, HBB, and SLC4A1 are genes associated with hemoglobin, and dexamethasone combined with ropivacaine may prolong anesthesia by affecting local vasoconstriction to some extent.

Effect of Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Rebound Pain After Ropivacaine Single Injection Femoral Nerve Block for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate whether transauricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) could reduce the incidence of rebound pain in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) under general anesthesia combined with preoperative femoral nerve block.

Methods

In total, 78 patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled study. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups (n=39): Group taVNS received taVNS (1h /1time, 6times) within the first 12 h after surgery; Group SS received sham stimulation (SS) in the same manner. Pain scores at 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 h after surgery were assessed with Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS). The incidence, duration and onset of rebound pain were recorded. In addition, additional analgesic requirements and side effects in the first 48 h postoperatively, as well as sleep disturbance on the night of surgery, were examined.

Results

The incidence and duration of rebound pain were lower in the taVNS group than in the SS group (P=0.025 and P=0.015, respectively). Pain scores at 8 h and 12 h postoperatively were significantly lower in the taVNS group compared with the SS group (P<0.05). The number of times to press the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump and the number of patients requiring additional analgesic were significantly lower in the taVNS group than in the SS group until 12 h after surgery (P=0.021 and P=0.004, respectively). The number of patients with sleep disturbance in the taVNS group was lower than that in the SS group (P=0.030).

Conclusion

The taVNS exerts beneficial effect on rebound pain after femoral nerve block in patients undergoing ACLR, which reduces the incidence and duration of rebound pain, the need for postoperative additional analgesic, and the number of complications.

[Rebound pain-From definition to treatment]

Hintergrund

Rebound pain als Nebenwirkung einer Regionalanästhesie ist ein übermäßiges Schmerzempfinden nach Abklingen der Wirkung der lokalen Betäubung, welches deutlich über den normalen Wundschmerz nach einer Operation hinausgeht. Dieses Phänomen rückt seit ca. 10 Jahren stärker in den Fokus der Forschung. Die konkreten Ursachen sind bisher unklar, und es existieren auch noch keine zielgerichteten Therapieempfehlungen.

Ziel der Arbeit

Dieser Übersichtsartikel soll der Leserschaft einen Überblick über den aktuellen Stand der Forschung geben. Es werden die Theorien zur Pathophysiologie vorgestellt und Prophylaxe- sowie Behandlungsstrategien erläutert.

Material und Methoden

Für diese Übersichtsarbeit wurden die von 2005 bis Mai 2021 auf PubMed erschienenen Publikationen zum Thema Rebound pain durchgesehen und die Definitionen der Autoren zu Rebound pain sowie die Annahmen zur Pathophysiologie und Therapieempfehlungen zusammengefasst.

Ergebnisse und Diskussion

Insgesamt wurden 22 Originalarbeiten im Hinblick auf die Definition von Rebound pain, die Annahme der Entstehung sowie Therapieoptionen ausgewertet. Dabei zeigt sich, dass keine einheitliche Definition existiert, die Pathophysiologie nicht eindeutig geklärt ist und zum aktuellen Zeitpunkt auch noch keine klaren Empfehlungen zu Prophylaxe sowie Therapie gegeben werden können.

Zusatzmaterial online

Die Online-Version dieses Beitrags (10.1007/s00101-022-01120-z) enthält eine tabellarische Zusammenstellung über Studiendesign sowie Kernaussagen der vorgestellten Studien.

Evaluation of intraoperative ketamine on the prevention of severe rebound pain upon cessation of peripheral nerve block: a prospective randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Pain after resolution of peripheral nerve block, known as 'rebound pain' (RP), is a major problem in outpatient surgery. The primary objective was to evaluate the benefit of intraoperative ketamine at an anti-hyperalgesic dose on the incidence of rebound pain after upper limb surgery under axillary plexus block in ambulatory patients. The secondary objective was to better understand the rebound pain phenomenon (individual risk factors).

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind study, patients were randomised to receive either a single dose of i.v. ketamine (0.3 mg kg^-1) or a placebo. Preoperative mechanical temporal summation and central sensitization inventory were applied to question underlying central sensitisation. Pain catastrophising and Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaires were used. Rebound pain was defined as pain intensity score >7 (numeric rating scale, 0-10) after block resolution. Postoperative pain was recorded at Days 1, 4, and 30 after discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 109 subjects completed the study, and 40.4% presented with rebound pain. Ketamine administration did not reduce rebound pain incidence or intensity. Temporal summation and central sensitisation inventory scores did not differ between subjects with and without rebound pain. The predictive risk factors were bone surgery (odds ratio [OR]=5.2; confidence interval [CI], 1.9-14.6), severe preoperative pain (OR=4.2; CI, 1.5-11.7), and high pain catastrophising (OR=4.8; CI, 1.0-22.3). At Day 30, the average daily pain was higher in the rebound pain group involving neuropathic characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Ketamine at an anti-hyperalgesic dose showed no benefit on rebound pain development. Although central sensitisation might not be involved, preoperative pain intensity, and catastrophising stand as risk factors. Because rebound pain remains frequent despite adequate procedure-specific postoperative analgesia, future studies should focus on patient-specific pain management.

Effect of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Ropivacaine on Cognitive Dysfunction and Inflammatory Response in Patients Undergoing Craniocerebral Surgery

Objective

To study the effects of dexmedetomidine in combination with ropivacaine in patients undergoing craniocerebral surgery and their efficiency on cognitive function and inflammatory response of patients.

Methods

100 patients undergoing craniocerebral surgery in our hospital from November 2018 to September 2020 were randomly selected and divided into a control group and an experimental group by drawing lots, with 50 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received routine anesthesia, while those in the experimental group received 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine combined with 0.5% of ropivacaine for anesthesia to compare the anesthesia onset time, analgesic time, postoperative awake time, Social Disability Screening Schedule (SDSS) cognitive function score after waking, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, Ramsay sedation score, incidence of adverse reactions, postoperative inflammatory factor expression levels, and changes in heart rate, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure at T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4 between the two groups.

Results

The anesthesia onset time, SDSS cognitive function score after waking, VAS pain score, Ramsay sedation score, incidence of adverse reactions, and postoperative inflammatory factor expression levels in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The analgesic time and postoperative awake time in the experimental group were significantly longer than those in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the changes of heart rate, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure at T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4 between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine has high application value in craniocerebral surgery.

Perineural dexamethasone reduces rebound pain after ropivacaine single injection interscalene block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A single injection interscalene block (ISB) is a common regional analgesic technique in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. However, rebound pain after ISB resolution may reduce its overall benefit. Our primary aim was to assess whether perineural dexamethasone reduces the intensity and incidence of rebound pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia combined with a preoperative single injection ISB.

METHODS

The patients were randomly assigned to receive single injection ISB using either 0.5% ropivacaine (control) or 0.5% ropivacaine containing 5 mg of dexamethasone. The primary outcomes were the pain score difference before and after ISB resolution, and the incidence of rebound pain. The secondary outcomes were the onset and duration of rebound pain, the presence of sleep disturbances due to postoperative pain, the first time when an analgesic was requested, and pain scores at various predefined time points.

RESULTS

Pain increase following ISB resolution was lower in the dexamethasone group compared with the control group (4.5±2.4 and 6.9±2.2, respectively, p<0.001). The incidence of rebound pain was significantly lower in the dexamethasone group compared with the control group (37.1% and 82.9%, respectively, p<0.001). The controls experienced greater sleep disturbance during the postoperative period compared with those who received ISB with perineural dexamethasone.

CONCLUSIONS

Perineural dexamethasone added to ISB using ropivacaine led to a much smoother resolution of ISB, reflected in a significantly smaller increase in pain after block resolution, a lower incidence of rebound pain and a lower sleep disturbance during the first postoperative week.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinical Trial Registry of Korea (KCT0004418).