Analgesic efficacy of postoperative bilateral, ultrasound-guided, posterior transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized, prospective, controlled study

Perioperative pain management with regional analgesia techniques for visceral cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Regional analgesia following visceral cancer surgery might provide an advantage but evidence for best treatment options related to risk-benefit is unclear.

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) with meta-analysis and GRADE assessment.

SETTING

Postoperative pain treatment.

PATIENTS

Adult patients undergoing visceral cancer surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Any kind of peripheral (PRA) or epidural analgesia (EA) with/without systemic analgesia (SA) was compared to SA with or without placebo treatment or any other regional anaesthetic techniques.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcome measures were postoperative acute pain intensity at rest and during activity 24 h after surgery, the number of patients with block-related adverse events and postoperative paralytic ileus.

MAIN RESULTS

59 RCTs (4345 participants) were included. EA may reduce pain intensity at rest (mean difference (MD) -1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.35 to -0.75, low certainty evidence) and during activity 24 h after surgery (MD -1.83; 95% CI: -2.34 to -1.33, very low certainty evidence). PRA likely results in little difference in pain intensity at rest (MD -0.75; 95% CI: -1.20 to -0.31, moderate certainty evidence) and pain during activity (MD -0.93; 95% CI: -1.34 to -0.53, moderate certainty evidence) 24 h after surgery compared to SA. There may be no difference in block-related adverse events (very low certainty evidence) and development of paralytic ileus (very low certainty of evidence) between EA, respectively PRA and SA.

CONCLUSIONS

Following visceral cancer surgery EA may reduce pain intensity. In contrast, PRA had only limited effects on pain intensity at rest and during activity. However, we are uncertain regarding the effect of both techniques on block-related adverse events and paralytic ileus. Further research is required focusing on regional analgesia techniques especially following laparoscopic visceral cancer surgery.

Postoperative Multimodal Analgesia Strategy for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have substantially proven their merit in diminishing recuperation durations and mitigating postoperative adverse events in geriatric populations undergoing colorectal cancer procedures. Despite this, the pivotal aspect of postoperative pain control has not garnered the commensurate attention it deserves. Typically, employing a multimodal analgesia regimen that weaves together nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, local anesthetics, and nerve blocks stands paramount in curtailing surgical complications and facilitating reduced convalescence within hospital confines. Nevertheless, this integrative pain strategy is not devoid of pitfalls; the specter of organ dysfunction looms over the geriatric cohort, rooted in the abuse of analgesics or the complex interplay of polypharmacy. Revolutionary research is delving into alternative delivery and release modalities, seeking to allay the inadvertent consequences of analgesia and thereby potentially elevating postoperative outcomes for the elderly post-colorectal cancer surgery populace. This review examines the dual aspects of multimodal analgesia regimens by comparing their established benefits with potential limitations and offers insight into the evolving strategies of drug administration and release.

PROcedure-SPECific postoperative pain management guideline for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A systematic review with recommendations for postoperative pain management

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed in women and third most common in men. Laparoscopic resection has become the standard surgical technique worldwide given its notable benefits, mainly the shorter length of stay and less postoperative pain. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature on postoperative pain management following laparoscopic colorectal surgery and update previous procedure-specific pain management recommendations. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements. We also considered study quality, clinical relevance of trial design, and a comprehensive risk-benefit assessment of the analgesic intervention. We performed a literature search to identify randomised controlled studies (RCTs) published before January 2022. Seventy-two studies were included in the present analysis. Through the established PROSPECT process, we recommend basic analgesia (paracetamol for rectal surgery, and paracetamol with either a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitor for colonic surgery) and wound infiltration as first-line interventions. No consensus could be achieved either for the use of intrathecal morphine or intravenous lidocaine; no recommendation can be made for these interventions. However, intravenous lidocaine may be considered when basic analgesia cannot be provided.

Postoperative Ileus after Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Summary of Current Strategies for Prevention and Management

BACKGROUND

Postoperative ileus (POI) is one of the most common postoperative complications after colorectal surgery and prolongs hospital stays. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has reduced POI, but it remains common. This review explores the current methods for preventing and managing POI after MIS.

SUMMARY

Preoperative interventions, including optimising nutrition, preoperative medicationn, and mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics, may have a role in preventing POI. Transversus abdominis plane blocks and lidocaine could replace epidural analgesia in MIS. Fluid overload should be avoided; in some cases, goal-directed fluid therapy may aid in achieving this. Pharmacological agents, such as prucalopride and dexmedetomidine, could target mechanisms underlying POI. New strategies to stimulate vagal nerve activity may promote postoperative gastrointestinal motility. Preoperative bowel stimulation could potentially reduce POI following loop ileostomy closure. However, the evidence base for several interventions remains weak and requires further corroboration with robust studies.

KEY MESSAGES

Despite the increasing use of MIS, POI remains a major issue following colorectal surgery. Further strategies to prevent POI are rapidly emerging. Studies using standardised definitions and perioperative care will help validate these interventions and remove barriers to accurate meta-analysis. Future studies should focus on establishing the impact of these interventions on POI after MIS specifically.

Comparison of analgesic effects between erector spinae and transversus abdominis plane blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Objective

To compare the analgesic effects and incidence of postoperative adverse events after the erector spine plane (ESP) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

In this retrospective observational study, clinical data of 103 patients undergoing LC in Changxing County People's Hospital from October 2020 to October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed, and the patients were divided into ESP-group (n=56) and TAP-group (n=57) based on the block method. The operation time, the change of visual analogue scale (VAS) score of static (sVAS) and dynamic (dVAS) pain after operation, the patient-controlled dose, and the remedial analgesic dose at 24 hours after the operation were compared between the two groups. The occurrence of postoperative adverse reactions in both groups was recorded.

Results

The dVAS scores of the ESP-group at one hour, three hours, six hours, and 12 hours after the operation were lower than those of the TAP-group (P<0.05). The patient-controlled dose and remedial analgesia dose of the ESP-group were significantly lower than those of the TAP-group (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

ESP block and TAP block in LC patients have similar operation time and incidence of postoperative adverse events such as nausea and vomiting. However, short-term postoperative analgesic effect of ESP block is superior to TAP and requires a lower dose of analgesia.

A prospective randomized study of multimodal analgesia combined with single injection transversus abdominis plane block versus epidural analgesia against postoperative pain after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery

PURPOSE

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a safe, effective, and promising analgesic procedure, but TAP block only cannot overcome postoperative pain. We conducted a prospective randomized study to evaluate postoperative pain control using multimodal analgesia (MA) combined with a single injection TAP block compared with epidural analgesia (EA) after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colon cancer surgery were enrolled in this study and randomized into EA and MA groups. The primary endpoint was the frequency of additional analgesic use until postoperative day (POD) 2. The VAS score, blood pressure, time to bowel movement, time to mobilization, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients (EA group, n = 33; MA group, n = 31) were analyzed. The patient characteristics did not differ markedly between the two groups. The frequency of additional analgesic use was significantly lower in the MA group than in the EA group (P < 0.001), whereas the VAS score did not differ markedly between the two groups. The postoperative blood pressure on the day of surgery was significantly lower in the MA group than in the EA group (P = 0.016), whereas urinary retention was significantly higher in the EA group than in the MA group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MA combined with a single injection TAP block after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery may be comparable to EA in terms of analgesia and superior to EA in terms of urinary retention.

The effects of ultrasound-guided QLB and TAPB combined with opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) on clinical efficacy of the patients undergoing abdominal surgery

Background

Although opioids provide effective analgesia for abdominal surgery, they also present serious unwanted side effects. Ultrasound-guild quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) have been proven to offer long-lasting and efficient analgesia during abdominal surgery. However, the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided QLB and TAPB combined with opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) in abdominal surgery remains unclear.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the impact of ultrasound-guided QLB and TAPB combined with opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) on the clinical efficacy of abdominal surgery.

Methods

A total of 122 patients scheduled for abdominal surgery at People's Hospital of Wanning between March 2021 and April 2022 were enrolled in this study. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group (QLB/TAPB + OFA, 62 patients) and the control group (opioid anesthesia, 60 patients). The clinical efficacy of the QLB/TAPB combined with OFA technique was evaluated by analyzing patients' vital signs, postoperative consciousness recovery time, numeric rating scale (NRS) score, and immune function in both groups.

Results

We observed that systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in experimental group were significantly higher than those in control group after induction (p < 0.05). Heart rate (HR) in experimental group was significantly lower than in the control group at intraoperative 1h (p < 0.05). Additionally, bispectral index (BIS), state entropy (SE), and response entropy (RE) levels in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, extubation and awakening time were significantly shorter in the experimental group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The NRS scores in the experimental group were markedly lower than those in the control group. Moreover, IL-6 and CRP levels in the experimental group were obviously lower than in the control group after postoperative 1d (p < 0.05). Interestingly, IL-6 (p < 0.001), CRP (p < 0.001), and PCT (p = 0.037) levels in female patients of the experimental group were all significantly lower than those in the control group after postoperative 1d.

Conclusions

Ultrasound-guided QLB and TAPB combined with OFA technique can reduce pain intensity and enhance the patients' immune function in abdominal surgery.

Addition of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block to Conventional Pain Regimens in Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Procedures-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (SACROTAP)

IMPORTANCE

There have been no randomized trials assessing the benefits of integration of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks in sacrocolpopexy procedure postoperative pain management.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the variation in pain perception upon adding TAP blocks to conventional oral pain medications in patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy. The primary outcome was the reduction in pain reported using the numeric rating scale (NRS) among patient groups. The secondary outcome was the change in narcotic analgesic use postoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective double-blind, pilot randomized controlled trial of women undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy, with and without supracervical hysterectomy, with 20 patients enrolled in each arm. Randomization included receiving a TAP block in addition to the conventional analgesic regimen.

RESULTS

A total of 48 women were approached to participate in the study; 40 women provided consent (20 per study arm) and completed the 7-day follow-up. Patients receiving a TAP block had lower NRS pain scores at 4 hours postoperatively (4.95 ± 0.76 vs 5.50 ± 0.61, P = 0.02), 7 days postoperatively (2.20 ± 1.11 vs 3.15 ± 1.04, P = 0.008), and lower cumulative NRS pain scores at 48 hours postoperatively (14.90 ± 2.2 vs 16.60 ± 2.04, P = 0.02) and 7 days postoperatively (17.10 ± 2.63 vs 19.75 ± 2.65, P = 0.003) than patients not receiving a block. Patients in the intervention group also had lower cumulative morphine milliequivalents at 7 days postoperatively (17.25 ± 10.7 vs 29.25 ± 14.53, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Use of TAP blocks in robotic sacrocolpopexy cases, with or without concurrent hysterectomy, may reduce postoperative pain and narcotic medication needs.

Bilateral 4-quadrant laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block reduces early postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, single-blind, randomized study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of bilateral 4-quadrant laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane (BLTAP) block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

This study was carried out at Private Medicabil Hospital, Bursa, Turkey, between September 2021 and March 2022. Patients were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=40, each): i) the standard analgesia (SA) group received the block and port-site infiltration with normal saline (NS); ii) the local anesthetic group received the block with NS and port-site infiltration of bupivacaine; iii) the unilateral laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane (ULTAP) block group received 2-quadrant block with bupivacaine on the right and NS on the left and port-site NS infiltration; and iv) the BLTAP block group received bilateral bupivacaine and port-site NS infiltration. Postoperative 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-hours visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and during cough, opioid requirement, presence of nausea and vomiting, and satisfaction scores were recorded.

RESULTS

The one-hour VAS score at rest was lower in the BLTAP block group than in the SA and ULTAP block groups. The change in VAS score was higher in the SA group than in the BLTAP block group. During cough, the one-hour VAS score was lower in the BLTAP block group than in the SA group. There were no differences among groups in other parameters.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral 4-quadrant laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block technique is more effective than SA, local anesthetic infiltration, and ULTAP block in preventing early postoperative pain after LC.Clinicaltrials.gov No.: NCT04641403.

Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Combined with Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

This study assessed the influence of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) combined with transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) on the recovery of elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.

METHODS

Ninety patients (age ≥ 60 years) undergoing laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery were randomly divided into general anesthesia group (group G), TAPB group (group NG), and TEAS combined with TAPB group (group NTG). Patients in the NTG group received TEAS at PC6, LI4, and ST36 acupoints and TAPB. Patients in the NG group received TAPB. The quality of recovery (QoR) was assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire. The percentages of T lymphocyte subsets were determined. Consumption of anesthetics, extubation time, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, time of first postoperative ambulation and flatus, and postoperative adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

QoR-15 scores on postoperative day (POD) 3 and POD 7 were higher in the NTG group than in the G and NG groups (P < 0.05). On POD 1 and POD 3, the percentages of CD3⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells and the CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio were higher and the percentage of CD8⁺ T cells was lower in the NTG group than in the G and NG groups (P < 0.05). Remifentanil consumption, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were lower and extubation time and time of first postoperative flatus were shorter in the NTG group than in the G and NG groups (P < 0.05). Compared with the G group, the VAS scores on POD 1 were lower in the NG group and those on POD 2 were lower in the NTG group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of TEAS and TAPB ameliorated postoperative pain, improved immune and gastrointestinal function, reduced the incidence of PONV, and effectively promoted postoperative recovery in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100042119).

Transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) on pain management after laparoscopic colorectal surgery (CRS) remains unclear since the only relevant meta-analysis on this topic did not separate laparoscopic CRS from open CRS. The aim of the study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of TAP with non-TAP in patients undergoing laparoscopic CRS.

METHODS

Four databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic using relevant keywords. Two authors independently completed evidence selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal. Available data were pooled in the random-effects model, and point estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported for postoperative pain at rest and on coughing, opioid consumption, length of hospital stay, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 14 RCTs (n = 1216) contributed to the present synthesis. Pooled result showed that patients in the TAP group had lower pain at rest than those in the non-TAP group at postoperative 2-h (mean difference [MD] = -1.42; P < 0.05), 4-h (MD = -0.97; P < 0.05), 12-h (MD = -0.75; P < 0.05), and 24-h (MD = -0.61; P < 0.05). Patients in the TAP group also had lower postoperative pain on coughing than those in the non-TAP group on the first day (MD = -1.02; P < 0.05). Moreover, TAP had lesser postoperative opioid consumption than non-TAP (standardized mean difference, -0.26; P < 0.05; I-square = 20%), and there were non-significant differences in hospital stay and adverse event between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative TAP is a safe and feasible pain management for laparoscopic CRS, particularly it is recommended when patient-controlled analgesia is not delivered. Therefore, laparoscopic TAP block might be a favorable administered strategy.

Analysis of Interventional Application Effect of Ultrasound-Guided QLB and TAPB in the Treatment and Analgesia of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Colorectal cancer is a common malignant tumor of the digestive system. In order to study the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided QLB and TAPB in the treatment and postoperative analgesia of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A total of 96 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery from January 2021 to January 2022 are selected as the study subjects. The results show that ultrasound-guided QLB and TAPB therapy have good analgesic effects in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery, and QLB treatment and postoperative analgesic effect are better than TAPB.

The Use of Peripheral Nerve Blockade in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery: Is There a Benefit?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to synthesize recent literature investigating the use of regional anesthesia for minimally invasive surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies investigating the use of newer peripheral nerve blocks such as erector spinae plane (ESP) and quadratus lumborum (QL) block are very limited. Evidence supporting the use of peripheral nerve blockade in laparoscopic or robotic surgery is very limited and of low-moderate quality. While transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block may decrease opioid and pain scores after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bariatric surgery, and colorectal surgery, the benefit of the block in the presence of multimodal analgesia remains to be clarified. Unilateral paravertebral block may be beneficial for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. ESP and rectus sheath blockade may enhance analgesia in laparoscopic surgery, but the magnitude of this benefit may not be clinically relevant. Limited evidence supports the use of QL block in laparoscopic urologic surgery. There is insufficient recent evidence to support the use of TAP or QL block for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.

Evaluation of Analgesia Effect after Ultrasound-Guided Laparoscopic Renal Surgery

Kidney surgery involves placing the kidney in the iliac fossa of the lower abdomen on the right or left side. Studies have found that most kidney patients experience moderate to severe pain after surgery. The stress response caused by postoperative pain, especially visceral pain, not only aggravates the patient's pain and irritability and aggravates the original complications but may also harm the early recovery of renal function and affect the survival of the kidney. Therefore, adequate postoperative analgesia for renal patients is essential. This paper combines ultrasound-guided laparoscopic technology to improve the postoperative analgesia effect of renal surgery and compares the data with experimental research methods. Through experimental research, it can be seen that the method proposed in this article has a certain effect, and ultrasound-guided laparoscopic technology can be used in follow-up clinical research to improve the analgesic effect of renal surgery.

Purely ropivacaine-based TEA vs single TAP block in pain management after elective laparoscopic colon surgery within an upgraded institutional ERAS program

Background

The aim of this study was to compare thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in post-operative pain management after laparoscopic colon surgery.

Methods

One hundred thirty-six patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection randomly received either TEA or TAP with ropivacaine only. The primary endpoint was opioid requirement up to 48 h postoperatively. Intensity of pain, time to onset of bowel function, time to mobilization, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and patients’ satisfaction with pain management were also assessed.

Results

We observed a significant decrease in opioid consumption on the day of surgery with TEA compared with TAP block (30 mg vs 14 mg, p < 0.001). On the first two postoperative days (POD), the balance shifted to opioid consumption being smaller in the TAP group: on POD 1 (15.2 mg vs 10.6 mg; p = 0.086) and on POD 2 (9.2 mg vs 4.6 mg; p = 0.021). There were no differences in postoperative nausea/vomiting or time to first postoperative bowel movement between the groups. No direct blockade-related complications were observed and the length of stay was similar between TEA and TAP groups.

Conclusion

TEA is more efficient for acute postoperative pain than TAP block on day of surgery, but not on the first two PODs. No differences in pain management-related complications were detected.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08647-z.