Temporary ICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic first wave: description of the cohort at a French centre

Incidence and Predictors of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Patients Admitted to a Temporary Intensive Care Unit during the COVID-19 Pandemic Waves: A Two-Year (2021-2023) Retrospective Cohort Study in Rome, Italy

To manage the number of critical COVID-19 patients, Umberto I Teaching Hospital in Rome established a temporary ICU on March 1, 2021. This study investigated the incidence and risk factors of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) among these patients during various COVID-19 waves. Patients were grouped by admission date according to the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant prevalent at the time (Alpha, Delta, Omicron BA.1, Omicron BA.2, Omicron BA.5, and Omicron XBB). First-HAI and mortality rates were calculated per 1000 patient-days. Predictors of first-HAI occurrence were investigated using a multivariable Fine-Gray regression model considering death as a competing event. Among 355 admitted patients, 27.3% experienced at least one HAI, and 49.6% died. Patient characteristics varied over time, with older and more complex cases in the later phases, while HAI and mortality rates were higher in the first year. Pathogens responsible for HAIs varied over time, with first Acinetobacter baumannii and then Klebsiella pneumoniae being progressively predominant. Multivariable analysis confirmed that, compared to Alpha, admission during the Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.5, and XBB periods was associated with lower hazards of HAI. Despite worsening COVID-19 patient conditions, late-phase HAI rates decreased, likely due to evolving pathogen characteristics, improved immunity, but also better clinical management, and adherence to infection prevention practices. Enhanced HAI prevention in emergency situations is crucial.

Implementing a provisional overarching intervention for COVID-19 monitoring and control in the Brazil-Colombia-Peru frontier

Introduction

he challenge was to provide comprehensive health resources to a remote and underserved population living in the Brazil-Colombia-Peru border, amid the most disruptive global crisis of the century.

Methods

In August 2021, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Amazonia (FIOCRUZ Amazônia) and partner collaborators implemented an overarching provisional program for SARS-CoV-2 detection and lineages characterization, training of laboratory personnel and healthcare providers, donation of diagnostic supplies and personal protective equipment, and COVID-19 vaccination. The expedition was conducted at the Port of Tabatinga, a busy terminal with an intense flux of people arriving and departing in boats of all sizes, located in the Amazon River basin. Local government, non-profit organizations, private companies, and other stakeholders supported the intervention.

Results

The expedition was accomplished in a convergence point, where migrant workers, traders, army personnel, people living in urban areas, and people from small villages living in riversides and indigenous territories are in close and frequent contact, with widespread cross-border movement. Using a boat as a provisional lab and storage facility, the intervention provided clinical and laboratory monitoring for 891 participants; vaccination for 536 individuals; personal protective equipment for 200 healthcare providers; diagnostic supplies for 1,000 COVID-19 rapid tests; training for 42 community health agents on personal protection, rapid test execution, and pulse oximeter management; and hands-on training for four lab technicians on molecular diagnosis.

Discussion

Our experience demonstrates that multilateral initiatives can counterweigh the scarcity of health resources in underserved regions. Moreover, provisional programs can have a long-lasting effect if investments are also provided for local capacity building.

1-year survival rate of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome based on ventilator types: a multi-center study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between types of ventilator and the one-year survival rate of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to SARS‑CoV-2 infection. This multi-center, retrospective observational study was conducted on 1078 adult patients admitted to five university-affiliated hospitals in Iran who underwent mechanical ventilator (MV) due to ARDS. Of the 1078 patients, 781 (72.4%) were managed with ICU ventilators and 297 (27.6%) with transport ventilators. Overall mortality was significantly higher in patients supported with transport ventilator compared to patients supported with ICU ventilator (16.5% vs. 9.3% P = 0.001). Regression analysis revealed that the expected hazard overall increased with age (HR: 1.525, 95% CI 1.112-1.938, P = 0.001), opacity score (HR: 1.448, 95% CI 1.122-2.074, P = 0.001) and transport ventilator versus ICU ventilator (HR: 1.511, 95% CI 1.143-2.187, P = 0.029). The Kaplan-Meier curves of survival analysis showed that patients supported with ICU ventilator had a significantly higher 1-year survival rate (P = 0.001). In MV patients with ARDS due to COVID-19, management with non-ICU sophisticated ventilators was associated with a higher mortality rate compared to standard ICU ventilators. However, more studies are needed to determine the exact effect of ventilator types on the outcome of critically ill patients.